Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Measures To Eliminate International Terrorism


Measures to eliminate international terrorism

A/RES/68/119, passed by the United Nations General
Assembly  December 16, 2013 without a vote.

After reaffirming a slew of prior resolutions and
insincere
condemnations of terrorism, the last paragraph on page 2 offers an
obtuse and opaque hint at the root of the problem, conflicting with
those previous resolutions.. [Emphasis added.]

A/RES/60/288

Reaffirming also that terrorism
cannot and should not be associated with
any

religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group,

A/RES/66/282

Reaffirming that terrorismcannot and
should not be associated with
any

religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group,
Emphasizing that tolerance and
dialogue among
civilizations and the

enhancement of interfaith and intercultural understanding are among the most

important elements in
promoting cooperation and success in combating terrorism,


and welcoming the various
initiatives to this end,

 

Terrorism can not be associated with Islam

That declaration is a prime example of Political
Correctness: “A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority,
and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds
forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by
the clean end.”[Wikiquote]

Turds do not have clean ends and terrorism
is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam.

    • religion
    • civilization
  • Dialogue among civilizations and understanding:
    • interfaith
    • intercultural
  • Most important elements in combating terrorism.

When we put the critical elements of the two
paragraphs together for comparison, cognitive dissonance is clearly
recognizable. If there is no causal relationship between religion and
terrorism, how can interfaith understanding combat terrorism?

terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam

Allah said that he would “cast terror“. Allah cast terror, plundering Jewish
settlements.  Allah told Moe that he terrified
the Jews more than Allah did.  Moe said that he was made victorious by terror.

Allah commanded Muslims to treat defeated victims
harshly to
terrorize
those to be attacked next.  Allah commanded Muslims
to maximize their military strength to terrify prospective victims.

Terror in modern Islamic strategy

Brig. S.K. Malik wrote The Qur’anic Concept of War
as a training manual for the army of Pakistan.  His analysis will
help
you to comprehend their strategy. Terror is both a means and an
end.
This paragraph comes from the bottom of page 59. [Emphasis added.]

Terror
struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only


a means, it is the end in
itself.
Once
a condition of terror into


the
opponent’s heart is obtained, hardly anything is left to be


achieved. It is the point where the means and
the end meet


and merge. Terror is not a
means of imposing decision upon


the enemy; it is me decision we
wish to impose upon him.

Allah hu Akbar!

That is what they say when they sacrifice hadi at
Eid. It is also what they said when they slit the throats of the flight
crews.  Yes, they sacrificed the flight crews to Satan, but there
is more, as Mohammed Atta commanded the hijackers in his final
instructions.

Shout,
‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear
in
the hearts of the non-believers. God said: ‘Strike above the neck, and
strike at all of their extremities.’ Know that the gardens of paradise
are waiting for you in all their beauty, and the women of paradise are
waiting, calling out, ‘Come hither, friend of God.’ They have dressed
in their most beautiful clothing.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/sep/30/terrorism.september113

He told them to shout the Takbir because it strikes fear. He cited 8.12
in which Allah promised to cast terror. He alluded to the whores of
Allah’s celestial bordello which are promised
to those who fight in his cause
, killing and being killed and the
upgrade available to those who take
any step to enrage or injure disbelievers
. .

terrorize you

Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and his four co-conspirators
had a few things to say about terrorism in their Response To The Nine Accusations.

So, if our
act of Jihad
and our
fighting with you caused
fear
and terror
, then many thanks

to God, because it is him that has thrown
fear into your hearts
,
which resulted in your infidelity,


paganism, and your statement
that God had a son and your trinity beliefs.

Why are those vermin still alive and eating on our dime?

So, our
religion is a religion of fear and terror
to the enemies of God: the Jews,
Christians, and pagans.


With God’s wiling, we
are terrorists to the bone
. So, many thanks to
God
.

The Arab poet, Abu-Ubaydah
AI-Hadrami, has stated: ((
We
will terrorize you, as long as we live
with

swords, fire, and airplanes.))

Why are those vermin not burning in Hell?

We ask to be near to God, we
fight you and destroy you and terrorize you
. The Jihad in god’s
cause is a


great duty
in our religion
. We
have news for you, the news is: You will be greatly defeated in


Afghanistan and Iraq and that
America will fall, politically, militarily, and economically. Your end
is very


near and your fall will be
just as the fall of the towers on the blessed 9/11 day. We will raise
from the


ruins, God willing. We will
leave this imprisonment with our noses raised high in dignity, as the
lion


emerges from his den. We
shall pass over the blades of the sword into the gates of heaven.


So we
ask from God to accept our contributions to the great attack
, the great attack on America, and
to


place our nineteen martyred
brethren among the highest peaks in paradise.


God is great and pride for
God, the prophet, and the believers

Why are Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan & Saudi Arabia still
polluting the face of the earth and infesting the world with vermin?

Why did Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton,
Shrub & Obama mislead the nation, lie to us about the identity and
character of the enemy and obfuscate the breadth, depth and intensity
of the existential threat it poses to Liberty?

Why does the United Nations commit treason against
the human race by obfuscating the source of genocidal, terrorist
Jihad?  If they sincerely wanted to combat international
terrorism, they would take measures to eradicate Islam from the face of
the earth. They would seek means of causing mass apostasy

among the Ummah al-Islamiyya.  Instead they seek to shield Islam
from exposure; to shield it  by criminalizing all questioning and
criticism of its damnable doctrines and practices.

This video illustrates the basics of Jihad, it is a
clue for you.

This longer video demonstrates the deceptions
of  Blair, Cameron, Obamination & Shrub.

While it conflates
hadith with Qur’an, it is conceptually accurate.

Citizens of the USA can use this on line petition to
inform their Congressmen and Senators of Islam’s egregious violations
of international human rights conventions and demand their enforcement
which requires that Islam be proscribed by law for promoting war and
genocide. When you sign it, it will email itself to Congress.

Europeans can not sign the petition, they should
email a link to their MP & MEP instead.


Advertisements

December 22, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Petitions, Political Correctness, Qur'an, Religion of Peace, Traitors, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Innocence of Islam Update: Heinous Defamation of Islam Petition


 

A growing number of Muslims has been searching the web for a petition
demanding the banning of the video: Innocence of Muslims. Their
searches have taken them to my blog posts about the video.  Now a
petition has been uttered and published and I am taking it apart bit by
bit because I take every instance of bitching about Islamophobia as an
opportunity to redouble exposure of Islam’s rotten core.

I am aware of the possibility that this blog post
will increase the petition’s publicity and signatures. So be it.
I have no doubt that it will receive far more signatures than the counter petition for preservation of free speech
because Muslims are organized and highly motivated.

Heinous Defamation of Islam and slandering of Prophet Muhammad must be
stopped from being labeled as Freedom of Expression and Action

http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/heinous-defamation-of-islam-and-slandering-of-prophet-m.html

Preamble

In the light of the movie “Innocence of
Muslims” the International Defamation Laws regarding religions must be
revised.

An act of freedom is committed for liberation not for causing violence.
Defamation of Religions must be barred. FREEdom of expression and
action does not mean letting all hell lose if that be the case then
there should never have been any laws made or enforced.

Any statement or act that causes social, political and mental unrest to
any section, sector, social group of society must have a law against it

Petition

The
movie “Innocence of Muslims” must be internationally banned and
International Defamation Laws must be revised to ensure that no more
intolerable religious slandering and defamation is carried out by any
individual or group of individuals against any Religious groups.

Innocence of Muslims

Islamic doctrine holds that only Muslims are
innocent: all others are rebelling against Allah and his Messenger.
Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:33
lists the punishments  applicable to rebels against Allah and his
Messenger including crucifixion, amputations and expulsion.  It is
only when we turn to Tafsir Ibn Kathir
that we learn the meaning of “wage war” in this context.  A list
of alternative elements is included, and it “includes disbelief.”

Anyone who does not believe in Allah and
embrace Islam is guilty of “waging war against Allah and his
Messenger”;
subject to execution.  The Hanifi school’s code of Shari’ah rules
that infidelity is to be punished by “destruction” .  In the case
of Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians, payment of Jizya may be substituted for destruction.  It
also states that Infidels may be attacked without provocation.
For the details on Jizya, click the link above and scroll up to page
213.

Are Muslims innocent?

Muslims are commanded to obey Allah and his Messenger.  They are
commanded to emulate Muhammad.  Allah’s imperatives which must be obeyed include: offensive conquest
against Pagans and People of the Book, terrorism [See also 8:57
& 8:60]
and genocide. Moe’s exemplary conduct to be emulated
includes: offensive conquest, genocide. rape of captured women and extortion.

To the extent that Muslims obey Allah and emulate Moe as they are commanded to do, they are
not innocent.  To the extent that they disobey, they are hypocrites, whose Islam goes no deper than their throats, who are to be killed.

International Defamation Laws

There are no international laws prohibiting
defamation of religion.  The HRC & GA resolutions passed each
year for the last decade do not have the force of law, they serve only
to give immoral authority to national blasphemy laws, which are used to
persecute indigenous minorities. An Ad Hoc Cmte. of the HRC has been
established to elaborate complementary standards to be injected
into ICERD through a binding protocol which would impose Islamic blasphemy law on the signatories to ICERD.

Under Shari’ah, any contradiction of Islam is
punishable. Simply saying “Jesus is Lord” can cost you your head.
Reviling Allah, Moe or Islam can cost you your head.  It is
labeled as mentioning “anything impermissible“.  Simple denial of
Allah’s deity  or Moe’s prophethood is sufficient.

Under the numerous resolutions, associating Islam
with terrorism is condemned.  If the Ad Hoc Cmte. is successful,
this listing of evidence of the association will be a criminal
offense.  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
33:26,27,
47:4,49:15,
59:2,13,
61:10-13;
Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

act of freedom

Our founders revolted against King George in 1776.
Ten years later, J.Q. Adams and T. Jefferson were asking Tripoli’s
Ambassador to England by what right the Barbary Pirates sacked our
shipping.  They were told that it was written in their laws that
Infidels should be attacked.  You would make Jefferson’s report to
Congress a criminal act.

free speech

Free speech is essential to a representative
republic so that the citizens can discuss political issues and matters
of state without fear of persecution.  The First Amendment
guarantees that we can criticize President Obama and his policies
without fear of arrest and detention.

Obamination

  • “Islam is a great religion of peace”
  • “We are not at war with Islam.”
  • “Our Muslim allies.”

Each and every one of those statements is a
God damned lie. Our liberties would be denied and our lives endangered
by criminalizing uttering & publishing refutations of those
lies.  For example: this list of relevant ayat is proof of the
falsehood of the third listed lie. You would make this a criminal
offense.


3:28
[http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//3.8052.html],
3:1184:89, 4:139, 4:1445:51, 9:23, 9:33, 60:1, 60:13

Our lives and liberties are already endangered by
prohibiting instructors at West Point and the War College from telling
the truth about Islamic doctrine and practice.

causing violence

Violence is caused by the damnable doctrines of
Islam, not by exposing them in videos.  The Innocence of Muslims
was on line for more than a month with no violence until it was
exploited by Egyptians as a pretext for violence required by their
damnable doctrines.

Defamation

To be defamatory, speech must be false and malicious
under Western legal standards. Islam’s slander law is different; it
prohibits any speech the subject does not like.

R2.2: Slander

Slander (ghiba) means to mention anything concerning a
person that he would dislike
, whether about his body, religion, everyday life,
self, disposition, property, son, father, wife, servant, turban,
garment, gait, movements, smiling, dissoluteness, frowning,
cheerfulness, or anything else connected with him.

defamation of Islam

Islam is already infamous because Moe deliberately
built a reputation for barbarian rapine so as to terrorize future
victims, rendering them incapable of mounting an effective
defense.  I refer doubters, dissenters and deniers to  8:57 & 59:13. See, for example, the reaction of one
Jewish settlement:

When they saw the Prophet; they said, “Muhammad and his army!
The
Prophet said, Allahu–Akbar!
(Allah is Greater) and Khaibar is ruined,
for whenever we approach a nation (i.e. enemy to fight) then it will be
a miserable morning for those who have been warned.”  Sahih Bukhari 4.52.195

The video does not defame Moe or Islam because its
conceptual content is true.  I disrespectfully direct doubters,
dissenters & deniers to another blog post which documents the fatal
facts:  http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the
.

Religion

By tradition, it is assumed that anything wearing
the mantle of religion is one, and is an equally valid pathway to
deity, on a par with Judaism and Christianity.  Assumptions make
asses of you.  Islam is perpetual war, far from being benign,
beneficent and anodyne, it is mercenary, martial and malignant.  For those damned
fools who know
that “Islam is not war”, I have a surprise: Moe told the truth
once.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction,
hold the tails
of oxen, are
pleased with agriculture, and
give up conducting jihad
(struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over
you,
and will not withdraw it until you return to your original
religion.

Jihad is the original religion
of Islam, which must not be abandoned on pain of execration.
Jihad is preferred  over agriculture and trade as an economic
model.

banned

If defamation of religions were banned, and the
proscriptions on genocide and propaganda for war were enforced, the
Shari’ah, along with Qur’an,  hadith  & tafsir would be
outlawed and their publication & reading prohibited. I
disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to 1:6, 5:60, 9:34 & 98:6.

September 22, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Petitions, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Innocence of Muslims Update: Obamination


http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/09/12/remarks-president-deaths-us-embassy-staff-libya

Since our founding, the United States
has been a nation that respects all faiths.  We reject all efforts
to denigrate the religious beliefs of others.  But there is
absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence.
None.  The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these
brutal acts.

 

respects all faiths

Respect is given where respect is due.  Do we
respect the Mafia?  Then why should we respect Islam, which began
as an Arab crime syndicate?  I direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers to another blog post which details with full documentation
Moe’s mission & motivation: Islam’s Mercenary Mission.

Is a belief system whose deity demands “great slaughter” as its Profit’s price of
admission to Paradise worthy of respect?  Does any sane
person respect a predatory way of life whose “original religion” is Jihad?

Does any believing Christian respect a faith that
denies the deity, crucifixion, death & resurrection of Jesus
Christ, depicts him as inferior to its Profit and reveres him as a genocidal warlord who will complete their genocide of the Jews?

denigrate beliefs

How is it possible to blacken that which is already
black?  What pious person who believes in the Almighty Creator
would follow a “Prophet” who, after the commencement of his ministry, married
the six year old daughter
of his bosom buddy, raped a prisoner of war and commissioned the murders of his critics?

In Shari’ah,
slander is anything the listener does not like.  In our legal
system, truth is an absolute defense against slander and
defamation.  “Innocence of Muslims” depicts Moe as a megalomaniac.
Was he a megalomaniac, or does the video defame him? To discover the
answer, turn to this appendix of quotes in The Prophet of Doom and read
relevant quotes from Ishaq, Tabari, the Qur’an & Sahih Bukhari: http://prophetofdoom.net/Islamic_Quotes_Megalomania.Islam

The video depicts Moe as a lustful lecher; is it
true or does it defame him? http://prophetofdoom.net/Islamic_Quotes_Lust.Islam
The video depicts Moe as a warmonger; is it true or does it defame
him?  http://prophetofdoom.net/Islamic_Quotes_Jihad.Islam

The video depicts Moe as insane or demon possessed;
is it true or does it defame him?  http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.45.5

The video depicts Moe as suicidal; was he suicidal or does it defame
him?  http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.46.3

The video depicts Moe as faking the Qur’an; did he
fake it or does it defame him?  Why don’t you consult his child
bride for the real answer? Her answer is in Sahih Bukhari 3.30.311. ” I feel that your Lord
hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires.”

Watch the trailer; the casting, acting and
production values leave something to be desired, but the content is
accurate.  I have provided links to the Noble Qur’an, Sahih
Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, Sunan Abu Dawud, Tafsir Ibn Kathir and The
Prophet of Doom
  so that you can determine the truth for
yourself.

In a just and rational world, documenting the
absolute evil of Islam’s founder and the continuing war crime he
founded would not be left up to amateurs, it would be done by our
government, to the highest professional standards and distributed world
wide as our best weapon in the “war on terrorism”.  Defeating Islam requires breaking their faith.
Exposing their profit and demon is the first step in that process. Our
government should be doing it, not bitterly bitching about it!

September 13, 2012 Posted by | free speech, Islam, Islam Distorted?, Political Correctness | , , , | Leave a comment

Obamination:Misrepresenting Islam–Iftar 2012


Obamination
presided over an Iftar August 10, 2012.  As is his habit,
Obanination spewed snake excrement.  I will footnote the
interesting chunks of crap with my comments which follow the
transcript.  Click the superscripts to view the comments, use your
Back Space key to return to your place in the spew.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/08/10/remarks-president-iftar-dinner

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you,
everybody.  (Applause.)  Please, please have a seat.
Good evening, everyone.  And welcome to the White House.

Of all the freedoms we cherish as Americans, of all the rights that we
hold sacred, foremost among them is freedom of religion, the right to
worship as we choose..1
It’s enshrined in the First Amendment of our Constitution — the law of
the land, always and forever.  It beats in our heart — in the
soul of the people who know that our liberty and our equality is
endowed by our Creator.  And it runs through the history of this
house, a place where Americans of many faiths can come together and
celebrate their holiest of days — and that includes Ramadan.2

As I’ve noted before, Thomas Jefferson once held a sunset dinner here
with an envoy from Tunisia — perhaps the first Iftar at the White
House, more than 200 years ago.  And some of you, as you arrived
tonight, may have seen our special display, courtesy of our friends at
the Library of Congress — the Koran that belonged to Thomas
Jefferson.  And that’s a reminder, along with the generations of
patriotic Muslims in America, that Islam — like so many faiths — is
part of our national story3.

This evening, we’re honored to be joined by members of our diplomatic
corps, members of Congress — including Muslim American members of
Congress, Keith Ellison and Andre Carson — as well as leaders from
across my administration.  And to you, the millions of Muslim
Americans across our country, and to the more than one billion Muslims
around the world — Ramadan Kareem.

Now, every faith is unique.  And yet, during Ramadan, we see the
traditions that are shared by many faiths:  Believers engaged in
prayer and fasting, in humble devotion to God.  Families gathering
together with love for each other.  Neighbors reaching out in
compassion and charity, to serve the less fortunate.  People of
different faiths coming together, mindful of our obligations to one
another — to peace4,
justice5
and dignity6
for all people — men and women.  Indeed, you know that the Koran
teaches, “Be it man or woman, each of you is equal to the other.7

And by the way, we’ve seen this in recent days.  In fact, the
Olympics is being called “The Year of the Woman.”
(Laughter.)  Here in America, we’re incredibly proud of Team USA
— all of them — but we should notice that a majority of the members
are women.  Also, for the very first time in Olympic history,
every team now includes a woman athlete.  And one of the reasons
is that every team from a Muslim-majority country now includes women as
well.  And more broadly — that’s worth applauding.
(Applause.)  Absolutely.

More broadly, we’ve seen the extraordinary courage of Muslim women
during the Arab Spring — women, right alongside men, taking to the
streets to claim their universal rights, marching for their freedom8,
blogging and tweeting and posting videos, determined to be heard.
In some cases, facing down tanks, and braving bullets, enduring
detentions and unspeakable treatment, and at times, giving their very
lives for the freedom that they seek — the liberty that we are lucky
enough to enjoy here tonight.9

These women have inspired their sisters and daughters, but also their
brothers and their sons.  And they’ve inspired us all. Even as we
see women casting their ballots and seeking — standing for office in
historic elections, we understand that their work is not done.
They understand that any true democracy must uphold the freedom and
rights of all people and all faiths. We know this, too, for here in
America we’re enriched by so many faiths10, by men and women — including
Muslim American women.

They’re young people, like the student who wrote me a letter about what
it’s like to grow up Muslim in America.  She’s in college.
She dreams of a career in international affairs to help deepen
understanding between the United States and Muslim countries around the
world.  So if any of the diplomatic corps have tips for her —
(laughter.)  She says that “America has always been the land of
opportunity for me, and I love this country with all my heart.”
And so we’re glad to have Hala Baig here today.  (Applause.)

They are faith leaders like Sanaa Nadim, one of the first Muslim
chaplains at an American college — a voice for interfaith dialogue
who’s had the opportunity to meet with the Pope to discuss these
issues.  We’re very proud to have you here.
(Applause.)

They are educators like Auysha Muhayya, born in Afghanistan, who fled
with her family as refugees to America, and now, as a language teacher,
helps open her students to new cultures.  So we’re very pleased to
have her here.  (Applause.)

They are entrepreneurs and lawyers, community leaders, members of our
military, and Muslim American women serving with distinction in
government.  And that includes a good friend, Huma Abedin, who has
worked tirelessly — (applause) — worked tirelessly in the White
House, in the U.S. Senate, and most exhaustingly, at the State
Department, where she has been nothing less than extraordinary in
representing our country and the democratic values that we hold dear11.
Senator Clinton has relied on her expertise, and so have I.

The American people owe her a debt of gratitude — because Huma is an
American patriot, and an example of what we need in this country —
more public servants with her sense of decency, her grace and her
generosity of spirit.  So, on behalf of all Americans, we thank
you so much.  (Applause.)

These are the faces of Islam in America12.  These are just a few
of the Muslim Americans who strengthen our country every single
day.  This is the diversity13 that makes us Americans; the
pluralism that we will never lose.

And at times, we have to admit that this spirit is threatened.
We’ve seen instances of mosques and synagogues, churches and temples
being targeted.  Tonight, our prayers, in particular, are with our
friends and fellow Americans in the Sikh community.  We mourn
those who were senselessly murdered and injured in their place of
worship.  And while we may never fully understand what motivates
such hatred, such violence, the perpetrators of such despicable acts
must know that your twisted thinking is no match for the compassion and
the goodness and the strength of our united American family.

So tonight, we declare with one voice that such violence has no place
in the United States of America14.
The attack on Americans of any faith is an attack on the freedom of all
Americans.  (Applause.)  No American should ever have to fear
for their safety in their place of worship.  And every American
has the right to practice their faith both openly and freely, and as
they choose15.

That is not just an American right; it is a universal human
right.  And we will defend the freedom of religion, here at home
and around the world.  And as we do, we’ll draw on the strength
and example of our interfaith community, including the leaders who are
here tonight.

So I want to thank all of you for honoring us with your presence, for
the example of your lives, and for your commitment to the values that
make us “one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice
for all.”  (Applause.)

God bless you.  God bless the United States of America.
(Applause.)

END
8:48 P.M. EDT

 


  1. Freedom of religion is an
    individual right, declared in the Declaration of Independence and
    enshrined in the Bill of Rights so that the federal government is
    prohibited from establishing a national church and dictating religious
    doctrines.  Freedom of religion can not be extended to Islam
    because  jihad, “holy fighting in Allah’s cause“, is “the apex of its hump” (the highest peak of Islam).
    It is not possible that the Bill of Rights can empower Islam to deny our freedom to manifest Christianity.
    It is not possible that the Bill of Rights can empower Muslims to wage war against us.
  2. Ramadan is not a holy day, it is a holy
    month: a celebration of the commencement of Moe’s revelations.
    Obamination is celebrating Moe’s insanity.
  3. This nation was founded by
    Christians, not Muslims.  Islam’s role consisted of attacking our
    shipping, seizing ships, cargoes and crews, enslaving the men and
    holding them for ransom.  Paying tribute to the Barbary
    Pirates
    nearly bankrupted the new nation.
  4. Ramadan celebrates the revelation of the
    Qur’an. It is impossible to link the Qur’an & Ramadan to
    peace.  The Qur’an ordains jihad for Muslims. It commands Muslims to wage perpetual war against Christians. Islamic law
    requires the caliph to mount a minimum of one military
    expedition against kuffar in every year
    and declares that infidels may be attacked without provocation.
  5. The indemnity for loss of one finger is ten camels. At
    that rate, the indemnity for loss of a hand would be fifty camels. Estimating the value of a camel at $1000, that
    makes a hand worth $50,000.00. Islamic law prescribes the penalty of hand amputation for stealing an item
    worth more than $58.00.  Justice?  Yeah, right.
  6. Moe declared that our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims until
    we become Muslims.  Dignity? Yeah, right.
  7. The indemnity for killing a male Muslim is
    100 camels. The indemnity for killing a Muslima is 50 camels. The indemnity for killing a Christian  is one
    third that for killing a Muslim
    . Equality?  Yeah, right.
  8. Muslim Spring has nothing to do with
    freedom. It is a contest over who is going to sit on the dictator’s
    throne.  They are revolting for power, not for freedom.  The
    result diminishes freedom, it does not augment freedom.
  9. If they sought freedom and liberty, their
    first act would be to abjure Islam and cast off Allah’s yoke of
    slavery.  Muslims have sold their souls to Allah
    for admission to his celestial bordello, so that they fight in his
    cause, killing others and being killed.  Unless and until they
    abjure that contract, they are not seeking liberty, they are seeking
    domination.
  10. Faith is more than form, it is
    content.  The doctrines Muslims believe in do not enrich
    America.  Only Allah has the right to be worshiped. Only Allah has the right to ruleMoe wants loot, Allah wants genocide. Allah rewards Muslims for acts of terrorism. Allah will damn you for shirking jihad.  Allah will bless you for going to jihad.
  11. Legislation by mutual consent,
    arrived at by an elected legislature is a democratic value.
    Imposition of Allah’s Shari’ah by force is an Islamic value. The two
    can not be squared; they are polar opposites.
  12. Huma Abedin’s face is that of an
    exotic beauty, belonging to her; it is not the true face of
    Islam.  Obamination seeks to personify Islam; to ascribe, without
    evidence, virtues to a physically attractive person and extend them to
    her belief system.  The true face of Islam is worn by Maj. Nidal
    Malik Hasan, S.O.A.

    Obamination is alluding to the letters sent
    by five members of the House Intelligence Cmte. about granting security
    clearances to Muslims having links to the Muslim Brotherhood.  He
    is, by innuendo, calumniating the committee members. Huma is so
    beautiful, and the exemplar of every virtue according to Obamination;
    it must be impossible that she could be a security  risk.
    The committee members put their focus on the wrong  association
    because they lack the courage to make a full frontal assault on the
    problem.  It is fashionable to attribute evil doctrines and
    practices to the Muslim Brotherhood but anathema to criticize
    Islam.  In reality, the brotherhood is nothing more or less than
    Islam.  Allah is their goal. That should be your first clue. The
    Qur’an is their constitution. That is your second clue.  Imposing
    Shari’ah on a global scale is their objective.  Death in Allah’s
    cause is their highest aspiration.  Those are clues for you but
    you can not perceive them because you have not read the Qur’an and
    hadith.  The brotherhood adds nothing to Islam doctrinally; it is
    only a reflection of heightened zealotry as described in Surah
    At-Taubah 9:111.

    Huma is not a security threat because
    her father was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood and her mother,
    brother and sister are active members. She is a security threat because
    she is a Muslim, a believer in Allah’s imperatives, threat and
    promise.  Huma is married to a Jew, a relationship strictly
    prohibited in Islamic law because their children will not be raised as
    Muslims and Kuffar are not permitted to have authority over
    Muslims.  But Islamic clerics are not condemning her marriage
    because it gave her a step up to a position of influence where she has
    the ability to advance the short term objective of “destroying their
    miserable house”. The necessity of engaging in subversion outweighs the
    law against Muslimas marrying Kuffar.

  13. Diversity does not make us Americans!
    Being born here makes us Americans. A mix of Christians, Jews and
    atheists is diversity enough, we do not need to add our sworn enemies
    in order to have diversity.
  14. Murder and arson are criminal
    offenses, regardless of the identity of the victims. The intrinsic evil
    of those crimes is not increased because the victims are Sikhs or
    Muslims.  Churches are burned and Christians are assaulted and
    murdered damn near every day in Africa and Egypt but we do not hear
    Obamination objecting to it or proposing aid to the victims.  He
    admits Muslims as refugees but  excludes persecuted
    Christians.  As Islamic demographics increase here, the incidence
    of attacks on Christians and churches will increase
    disproportionately.
  15. Rights are reciprocal.  In
    the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Christians are arrested, jailed and
    deported for having prayer meetings in their apartments.  In
    Egypt, Indonesia and Pakistan, they are not allowed to build new
    churches or maintain existing churches. Islamic law specifically
    forbids building churches, displaying crosses, ringing bells and public
    prayer & processions.

    Islam is inseverable, an all or nothing package deal
    which includes genocidal conquest
    and licenses Muslims to rape captive women.  The practice of Islam is
    not complete without jihad!  It is therefore impossible that
    Muslims can have a right to practice Islam because it contravenes our
    right to live in peace free of threat and assault.  9/11  was
    an Islamic act of worship;
    read the second page of the confession.

August 12, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Open Letter to the Students and Faculty of West Point


Ladies and gentlemen:

Greetings from a citizen 4F & 1Y both unable and disinclined to serve as you are doing or preparing to do.  I am no more than a web warrior, and satisfied with this status.  Thank you for your service to our country. May Almighty God hold you in his protective grip and keep you out of harms way, shield you and make you victorious.

Last week, one of your number searched Google for information relating to Muslims lying to non-Muslims.  My guess is that the searcher wanted information about the Islamic doctrine of Al-Taqiyya, but due to the vagaries of the search engine algorithms, was served up my post about a video debate between Pamela Geller and a lying Muslim.  I doubt that my blog post met the searcher’s need.

Al-taqiyya literally means to protect; to prevent harm to the individual Muslim and to Islam. It is derived from Surah Al-Imran 3:28.

3:28. Let not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters, helpers, etc.) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allâh in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them. And Allâh warns you against Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.

Tafsir Ibn Kathir has a fairly loquacious explanation of that verse; I will quote a relevant fragment.

(unless you indeed fear a danger from them) meaning, except those believers who in some areas or times fear for their safety from the disbelievers. In this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship to the disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly. For instance, Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda’ said, “We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.” Al-Bukhari said that Al-Hasan said, “The Tuqyah is allowed until the Day of Resurrection.” [The Prohibition of Supporting the Disbelievers]

Obamination does not want you to have access to that information because it illuminates their treason as well as Shrub’s.  We do not have Muslim partners or allies; we have Muslim enemies.  That fact may be fatal to those of you who will be sent to Afghanistan; Obamination does not want you to know it.

Training programs for the military, intelligence & security services are being purged of factual information about the enemy.  This means that you must either obtain and read the writings of Robert Spencer & Raymond Ibrahim or delve into the source texts on your own, if you have sufficient time.

You should, at minimum read Surahs Al-Anfal & At-Taubah of the Qur’an.  To discover how Muhammad interpreted what he revealed, turn to the authentic hadith collection of Bukhari and read the books of jihad, khumus & expedition.  If you have difficulty understanding the Qur’an or can’t take the time to wade through all those sayings, reading Tafsir Ibn Kathir is a good alternative. I will give you the starting points, skip over the Arabic script and use the navigation buttons at the top of each page.

Shari’ah or Islamic law is a deep and complex subject and controversial.  Fortunately for you, the laws of jihad which you need to know about are a relatively small part of it.  I want you to read, at a minimum, Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9 from O9.0 through O9.14.  That is the code of the Shafi’i school, the Hanifi school has some differences and also adds some clarity though the type face is antique and the vocabulary is arcane & archaic. Read at minimum the first two pages of Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1. Read as much more as you have time for and can tolerate. {Update07/08/12: Original link to Reliance was broken. Alternative source:

http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=617

For those who are swamped and need the “Cliff Notes” version: my blog post entitled “What You Need to Know About Islam” contains the two most vital parts of Reliance and an outline containing links to the ayat and ahadith you really need to read.    My post entitled “What’s Wrong With Islam & Muslims ?” hits the high points with a bit more detail.

The experts will tell you to read the Sira & Tahrik. It is possible that “The Life of Muhammad” and Volumes 6-9 of Tabari’s History may be in your library, I would bet against it.  I have a secret for you: The “In His Own Words” appendix of “The Prophet of Doom” has the most important quotes from those books along with related ayat & ahadith.

June 19, 2012 Posted by | Ahadith, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Obamination: Resign! Resign!! Resign!!!


A rapidly growing segment of the American electorate is outraged by the malfeasance of Obamination and misfeasance of those who should have resisted his suicidal policies in Congress.

We who are outraged need a means of collective and individual expression that will let us know that we are not alone in our suffering and outrage.  We need a way to testify to our fellow citizens that we are outraged and want the ship of state set aright on a course away from the maelstrom of destruction which is Obamination.

We need a way to tell our contemptible demagogues that we recognize what they are and are finished with them; that we disrespectfully demand their resignations, expressing our lack of confidence in and contempt for them.

Resign! Resign!! Resign!!!  is a new Facebook group that can give us the voice we need.

  • If you are fed up with the lies, racism, class warfare propaganda and malignant malarkey flowing from Obamination, please join this group and add your friends.
  • If you are fed up with rules of engagement that cost precious American lives in Afghanistan, join this group and add your friends.
  • If you are fed up with a President who anal osculates the enemy, join this group and add your friends.
  • If you are fed up with losing your job and being unable to replace it, join this group and add your friends.
  • If you are fed up with the high price of fuel & food, join this group and add your friends.
  • If you are fed up with losing the equity in your home, join this group and add your friends.
  • If you are fed up with the threat of impending forclosure, join this group and add your friends.
  • If you are fed up with the escalating erosion of your investments, join this group and add your friends.

The group’s statement is reproduced below with one minor change. One word has been bowdlerized, it is indicated by bold italic type face.  Most readers will easily guess the real word.

This group is an open demand directed to President Obama, his appointees & assigns, the timid Republican leadership in the House of Representatives and every Congressman & Senator who voted for or failed to stand firm against Stimulus, Son of Stimulus,  TARP and Obama Don’t Care.

We have no confidence in your ability, skill, will or desire to lead this nation. We have no faith in your fidelity or trustworthiness. We consider you part of the problem, not part of the solution. We disrespectfully demand your immediate resignations.

You are feces. Many of you can and will be flushed in November of next year. Why wait?  Flush yourselves now; limit the stink.

Resign! Resign!! Resign!!!  http://www.facebook.com/groups/144597398957614/

August 8, 2011 Posted by | Political Correctness, Politics | , , , | Leave a comment

Free Speech Has No Future


Cass Sunstein: The Future of free Speech, serialized in Little Mag, should serve as a warning of things to come if Obamination remains in power or is succeeded by another Socialist.

Sunstein discusses the concept of public forums, finding them crucial to our form of government. He hints at considering the means of communication as a public good.  Its a long way from Hyde Park to the internet, but Sunstein wants to conflate them. Examine his central concern.

“In a system with public forums and general interest intermediaries, people will frequently come across materials that they would not have chosen in advance – and for diverse citizens, this provides something like a common framework for social experience.”

In a small village, a single newspaper may serve as the local news source. One church, one fraternity, one school, one theatre  and one coffee shop may give the villagers shared experiences. But the USA is a great nation, not a small village.  There are many different institutions and services.  There are numerous newspapers, radio and television broadcasters, with divergent points of view and market niches.

Consumers can and do choose, and “birds of a feather flock together”, that is the way nature works.  Once the nation stared at Chronkite or Brinkley, and soaked up the same lies together.  Now we soak up lies from many different sources.

“All too many people are now exposed to louder echoes of their own voices, resulting, on occasion, in social fragmentation, misunderstanding, and sometimes even enmity. Perhaps it is better for people to hear fewer controversial views than for them to hear a single such view, stated over and over again. I now turn to this issue.”

Does Sunstein want to force Liberals to listen to Rush Limbaugh and watch Fox News?  Yeah, right.  I have sampled Randy Rhodes, John Hightower, Larry King and others. They raise my blood pressure too much. Keith Olbermann would make my bladder burst. I’ll continue to listen to Rush, Sean & Mark; if Cass disapproves, he can go to Hell.

“If greater communications choices produce greater extremism, society may, in many cases, be better off as a result. But when group discussion tends to lead people to more strongly held versions of the same view with which they began, and if social influences and limited argument pools are responsible, there is legitimate reason for concern.”

“Extremism in the defense of liberty…” What is the value in arbitrarily decreasing the intensity or changing the direction of our views? This is all about cementing Scialists in power.

“Consider discussions among hate groups on the Internet and elsewhere. If the underlying views are unreasonable, it makes sense to fear that these discussions may fuel increasing hatred and a socially corrosive form of extremism.”

Who is to judge what ‘views’ are ‘unreasonable’?  Here come the thought police!

This does not mean that the discussions can or should be regulated in a system dedicated to freedom of speech. But it does raise questions about the idea that “more speech” is necessarily an adequate remedy – especially if people are increasingly able to wall themselves off from competing views.

What is the remedy?

The basic issue here is whether something like a “public sphere,” with a wide range of voices, might not have significant advantages over a system in which isolated consumer choices produce a highly fragmented speech market.

Should we be like a doctatorship with state run media feeding us a steady diet of propaganda?

“The most reasonable conclusion is that it is extremely important to ensure that people are exposed to views other than those with which they currently agree, in order to protect against the harmful effects of group polarisation on individual thinking and on social cohesion.”

Yeah, that’s the solution: remote controlled idiot boxes blasting opinions inimical to our own, holding us as a captive audience!

For those who believe that the free speech principle has democratic foundations, and is not about consumer sovereignty, government regulation of television, radio, and the Internet need not be objectionable, at least so long as it is reasonably taken as an effort to promote democratic goals.

The free speech principle is crucial to our form of government. Voters must be allowed to communicate relevant facts and opinion and debate them openly in order to make wise decisions on candidates and related issues.

In deprecating ‘consumer sovereignty’, Sunstein deprecates popular sovereignty as well.  The people are sovereign, we give limited power to the government for limited  amd well defined purposes.  The popular sovereignty and consumer sovereignty are inseverable; if either is lost, both are lost. We can not be free if artificially & arbitrarily deprived of choices.

Sunstein advocaztes mandates & disclosure reports for broadcasters including: educational programming, closed captioning, free airtime for office seakers, coverage of local issues and allowing opposition views to be heard.

He does not stop there. he advocates requiring web sites to provide links to web sites with opposing views and “allow competing voices to be heard”.

Adding insult to injury, Sunstein advocates ‘voluntary self-regulation’.  The variety of competing viewpoints might be reduced by “a ‘code’ of appropriate conduct”.   The code would include, allowing opposing views, avoiding ‘unnecessary’ sensationalism and offering arguments rather than quick ‘sound-bytes’.

The ‘code ‘ would be “encouraged but not imposed by government”.  If the ‘code’ is not ‘voluntarily’ implemented, the government “might impose “must carry” rules on highly partisan Websites”. So much for ‘voluntary self-regulation’.  When you urinate on my shoes and tell me “its raining”, you insult my intelligence.

The Unfairness Doctrine is rising from the dead, in a disguised and expanded form.  It is all about squelching dissent under color of improving social intercourse.  They might as well limit us to one political party for the purpose of promoting ‘common experience’m unity & social cohesion.

LibTards kvetch about ‘balkanization’ while practicing the politics of division: pandering to Mexicans, Queers, abortion fanatics & Islam and engaging in class warfare.  There is something rotten in Washington: Obamination. Wise up, rise up, speak out and turn them out in the next election cycle!

December 3, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , | 2 Comments

   

%d bloggers like this: