Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu on Islamophobia at OIC-CFM 39

Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu on Islamophobia at OIC-CFM 39

An excerpt from a statement
by Prof. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu Secretary General of the Organization of
Islamic Cooperation
at the Thirty-Ninth Session of the Council of
Foreign Ministers of OIC Member States Date: 15/11/2012 –

[All emphasis and links added.]

remains a source of great concern for us. We have, at the
OIC, exerted considerable and dedicated efforts to combat this
phenomenon whose pace has increased recently as shown in the reports of
the OIC Islamophobia Observatory, the last of which is the fifth report
submitted to you. We have raised this issue with political and
religious elites we have met in different parts of the world,
underscoring its dangerous impacts on the prevalence of international
peace and security.

Thanks to these efforts, we managed to convince the UN Human Rights
Council, consistent with the eight points I proposed, to adopt the
consensual resolution 16/18 which
includes a genuine condemnation of
the defamation of religions
and discrimination against people on
religious grounds. Paragraph 6 of the resolution provides for the
adoption of measures to criminalize incitement to violence based on
religion or belief. The UN General Assembly adopted the resolution by
consensus under number 66/167.

To enhance the chances of these two resolutions being implemented on
the ground, I put forward ‘the Istanbul process’ initiative in July
2011 which reaffirms the two resolutions, followed by a similar
initiative in Washington in December of the same year. A third
initiative will follow in England in the name of the European Union in
December this year. Meanwhile, we are still struggling to overcome the
obstacles preventing the actual implementation of these initiatives.
The adoption of these two consensual resolutions by the UN Human Rights
Council and the General Assembly respectively is indeed a positive
development that gives us the opportunity to concentrate on important
issues away from politicization and polarization. It also gives us the
opportunity to introduce the ‘Istanbul Process’. I am convinced that
the confidence-building efforts exerted in the ‘Istanbul Process’
meeting and approved by international and regional stakeholders will
pave the way for increased confidence and cooperation between all

After the launch of the defamatory film ‘Innocence of Muslims’ which
insults Islam and Prophet Mohammad (PBUH), and the subsequent disorders
which caused many deaths including the killing of the US Ambassador in
Libya, I condemned in the strongest terms the film, the killing of US
officials and the attack on the US Embassy in Cairo, insisting that the
expression of anger and condemnation should not be through killing or
the destruction of property. Moreover, we issued a joint statement with
the European Union, the League of Arab States and the African Union
denouncing strongly the perpetrators of these crimes.



Phobia implies an irrational fear or loathing.
Exactly what is irrational about fearing a war cult which has sent an estimated 270*106  people to
early graves
?  Exactly what is irrational about loathing
a war cult whose doctrine declares
perpetual war against us
, denies the sanctity of our lives & property,
denies our human rights
and imposes the death penalty on us because we do
not join it

peace and security

International peace & security are not
threatened by fear & loathing of Islam. Peace and security are not
negatively impacted by factual exposure of the damnable doctrines &
practices of Islam. Peace and security  are threatened by the damnable doctrines of Islam and the
efforts of Muslims to implement those doctrines.

Muslims riot and raise Hell because of their
arrogance, supremacism & triumphalism; roused by the rabid rants of
their Imams at Jumah Salat, not because of anything we utter and
publish.  Take a fresh, close look at FITNA
and what Ban Ki-moon said about it.  The movie is not hate speech
neither is it incitement, it is an exposure of hate speech and

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,”
Ban said in a statement. “The right of free
expression is not at stake here.


of religions

Elimination of the defamation meme from the most
recent UN resolutions was the critical selling point that facilitated
their passage by acclamation.  If the defamation provisions had
remained in the resolutions, tere would have been votes, many of them
against the resolutions.

Take a fresh, close look at how human rights NGOs
praised and celebrated the new resolutions and how I condemned
them.  My analysis is confirmed, Article 19 & Human Rights
First are shown to be willing victims of al-Taqiyya.

Previous resolutions complained bitterly about
associating Islam with terrorism:

L.32/Rev.1 Elimination of all
forms of intolerance and of discrimination based on religion or
belief  Oral
revision not reflected in this version.

Also emphasizes that no religion should be equated with terrorism, as

may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom
of religion

or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned;


7. Expresses deep concern, in this respect, that Islam is frequently
and wrongly

associated with human rights violations and terrorism; [combating
 / vilification
of Islam

Who created the association? Moe did it! The proof
is outlined below the horizontal line with citations to the Qur’an,
hadith, tafsir & Sira.  This
is what they are bitching about; what they seek to outlaw. They want to
persecute me, fine, imprison and decapitate me for revealing these
fatal facts to you.

Web definitions:
a false
of an offense or a malicious misrepresentation of
someone’s words or actions.

Falsity is a critical element of defamation.
If it ain’t false, it ain’t defamatory.  Exactly what is false in FITNA?
Exactly what is false in the outline of fatal facts below?

defamatory film ‘Innocence of

Exactly what part of The Innocence of Muslims
is false?   Here is my documentation of the video:

Is terrorism intrinsic to Islam or is it not?
Was Moe a bastard? Neither hadith nor Sira indicate that, is it really
important? His paternity has been a subject of scholarly
speculation.  He did claim, in one hadith, to be Christ’s paternal
half brother.

Did Moe hide under his wife’s skirt? Yes, he did,
its in the Sira.  Did her cousin fake the Qur’an? I doubt it, I
find no evidence for it, but the bit about the gap in revelations is in
the Sira.

Did Moe converse with a donkey? It is in an obscure
book by Ibn kathir and it is found in the Encyclopedia of
Canonical Hadith

Was Moe a lecher? Did he put words in the idol’s
mouth to sanction it? Yes, its in the hadith.   Was Moe an
extortioner? Yes, his extortion letters are on record.  Did he
marry a six year old girl?  Yes, its in the hadith and Sira.

Did he have an old lady murdered? Yes, its in the
Sira.  Did he have Kinnana tortured to death? Yes, but not exactly
as depicted.  Its in the Sira.

Did he do it with Miriam in Hafsa’s bed?  Yes,
its in the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.  Was Moe queer?
Did he jigger his camels? I don’t know, I did not see it in the movie
and I did not find it in the books.  I bring that up because I
found another analysis of the trailer to which I have added links. It
is included  immediately below.   I find that, on the
whole, the trailer is not false and defamatory, its major conceptual
content is true.

[Note: the file linked here is 141MB. It will be easier to obtain hard
copy from Amazon.  The alternative is to load it once and use the
page numbers in subsequent links to navigate through the pdf.]

Thanks to Louis Palme for sending us the following references:

Was the “Innocence of Muslims” video trailer accurate?

Most of us have seen “Innocence of the Muslims” the film trailer that
sparked rioting which resulted in over 50 dead and millions of dollars
of damage.  …

Listed below are the scenes (by time-stamp and theme) along with the
references to Islamic sacred texts that provide support for the

3:02 – Muhammad’s father is unknown. (His father died before he was
born, and his mother never raised him.) Ishaq, The Life of Muhammad,
para. 105

Page 68 on pdf 58 mentions marriage & conception of Moe through
death of Abdullah.  I found no
uncertainty about . Moe’s parentage.

3:45 – Young Muhammad taking orders from and married to older Khadija –
Ishaq, para. 120

4:43 -Muhammad buries his face in Khadija’s garments to determine if
visions are divine or satanic – Ishaq, para. 154

5:24 – Khadija’s cousin Waraqa is a Christian scholar who helped
Muhammad – Ishaq, para. 121

pg.  83 on pdf 65

5:43 – Muhammad’s revelations stopped when Waraqa died, prompting him
to consider suicide – Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 6, No. 478

6:27 – Muslims used booty for their income – Quran Surah 48:20
48&l=eng&nAya= 20# 48_ 20

See also Book 53 of Sahih Bukhari:

6:35 – “Muhammad is our messenger and the Quran is our constitution.”
— taken from the Muslim Brotherhood oath

: The Slogan of the Hamas

Allah is its goal, the Prophet its model, the Qur’an its
Constitution, Jihad its path and death for the case of Allah its most
sublime belief.”

7:19 – Muhammad given special privileges regarding women and marriage –
Quran Surah 33:37-38
33&l=eng&nAya= 37# 33_ 37

8:37 – Muhammad is linked to Allah in authority and worship – Quran
Surahs 3:32, 4:80, 8:20, 9:71, 24:47, 24:54, 47:33, 61:11, 64:8. 64:12,
and many others

Use link above, then navigation tools at the top of the page to select
other Surahs and ayat.

9:11 – Abu Bakr gives his nine-year-old Aisha in marriage to
fifty-five-year-old Muhammad — Sahih al-Bukhari Vol. 5, No. 234

9:27 – Muhammad and Omar are “gay.” (With nineteen wives and
concubines, Muhammad had very few children and no male heirs.)
References to bizarre sexual behavior can be found in Sahih al-Bukhari,
Book 4, No. 143, Sahih al-Bukhari, No. 2393, and Sahih Muslim, Nos.
3663 and 3674. The story about Omar apparently comes from this Shiite
cleric’s speech:

I do not find No.2393 in Khan’s translation, there is nothing sexual in
Aisha’ Bewley’s 2393. Sahih Muslim 2393 is also innocent. Muslim
10.3663 is innocent, likewise 10.3674.

11:15 – An elderly woman, Umm Qirfa, is torn in two by two camels –
Ishaq, para. 980

11:32 – “Whoever refuses to follow Islam has only two choices – pay
extortion or die.” – Quran Surah 9:29
9&l=eng&nAya= 29# 9_ 29

12:38 – Torture of Kinana bin al-Rabi (a Jew) in front of his wife,
Safiya, who Muhammad later raped – Ishaq, paras. 764 – 767

13:10 – Fight between Muhammad and two of his wives – Hafsa and Aisha –
when he is caught in bed with Hafsa’s Coptic slave Maryah after he had
promised not to sleep with her. This is the subject of Quran Surah 66.
66&l=eng&nAya= 1# 66_ 1

13:43 – “Every non-Muslim is an infidel; their land, women and children
are our spoils.” – Ishaq, para. 484
8&l=eng&nAya= 67# 8_ 67
33&l=eng&nAya= 26# 33_ 26


The Innocent Prophet

Imran Firasat’s upcoming video is sure to outrage
Muslims. Here is the trailer. Note: Firasat has juxtaposed Chapter
& Verse. [Big deal.] The military intelligence offices of the U.S.
& Canadian governments have been seeking information about this
video, presumably because they expect it to influence enemy activity
against our forces in the field.

They should learn tha fatal facts of Islam herein
referenced and wise up to the fact that Islamic violence is doctrine
driven, not grievance driven.

Did the Almighty Creator select as his final Prophet
and Messenger an unrepentant pederast, lecher, false prophet, murderer
and genocidal warlord?  Or is Islam the world’s most successful
con game?

If Moe was a false prophet and Islam is a con game;
a continuing criminal enterprise guilty of war crimes against humanity,
then why in Hell should warning the world about it be a criminal

If Moe was a true Prophet, Allah is the Almighty
Creator and Islam is true, a perfect religion innocent of offensive,
genocidal & terrorist conquest then post proof in a comment: refute
each and every fatal fact presented and documented below the horizontal
line.  Good luck with that.

November 25, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Innocence of Muslims Update: Hisham Kandil: Go to Hell!

Egypt’s Prime Minister Hisham Kandil

 “We ask the American government
to take a firm position1
toward this film’s producers2 within the framework of
international charters3 that criminalise acts that stir
on the basis of race, colour or religion5.”

This is what the Minister is bitching about:

I believe that the primary source is Martin Ling’s Sira, which is considerably shorter
than Guillaume’s. Much of the story can be verified in Ibn Sa’d’s Sira
including the  hallucinations, suicidal tendency  and
offensive violence.  The murders commissioned by Moe are
documented here:  List
of Killings Ordered or Supported by Muhammad
.  Moe really did
marry the six year old daughter of his bosom buddy; for the details, go
to:  Aisha’s
Age of Consummation

Attention Lazy
doubters & deniers
the most significant quotes from Hishham’s Rescension of Ibn Ishaq’s
Sira & Tabari’s Tahrik are to be found in the topical quotes
appendix of The Prophet of Doom. You can save a great deal of time by
perusing these listings in the right sidebar.:

  1. This is a demand for censorship: prohibition
    and punishment of publishing facts unflattering to Islam.
  2. The writer, director, producer and
    distributors are acting within their rights guaranteed by the Bill of
    Rights cited below.
  3. ICCPR
    [Emphasis added.]

    • Article 19
    • 1.
      Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.

      Everyone shall have the right to freedom of

      this right shall include freedom to seek, receive
      and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers,
      either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through
      any other media of his choice.

      The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article
      carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore
      be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are
      provided by law and are necessary:

      For respect of the rights2 or reputations3 of

      For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre
      public), or of public health or morals.

    • Article 20

      Any propaganda for
      shall be prohibited by law

      Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to
      discrimination, hostility or violence
      5 shall be prohibited by law.

    • Amendment I Congress shall
      make no law
      respecting an establishment of religion5, or
      prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom
      of speech, or of the press6
      ; or the right of the
      people peaceably
      to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
  4. Publishing a video clip of a documentary
    film is not an act stirring strife.  Nowhere in the video is the
    audience exhorted to perform any violent act.  Muslims rioted in
    Egypt and Libya because they are Muslims: rabble roused by the media,
    Imams and militia leaders, not because of the video clip.

    Islamic law declares that “Infidels may be attacked without provocation“.
    Five of the 9/11 conspirators signed a statement which included this
    sentence:  “Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest
    religious duty to fight you over your infidelity

  5. Siraj Wahhaj is Black, Ibrahim Hooper is
    White; both are Muslims: what race is Islam?  Islam is not a race!  What
    legitimate religion is mercenary: created for the personal emolument of
    its founder through the accrual of spoils of war?  What legitimate
    religion is violent: commanding and mandating perpetual war?  What
    legitimate religion mandates the execution of anyone who apostatizesIslam is not a legitimate religion!


  1. The video imparts information: by
    means of the video, people unable or unwilling to read can discover
    that Moe was an impious fraud who falsely attributed his own words to
    his god.   They can discover his pederasty & lechery and
    his barbarism.  The audience has a right to know, even though
    Muslims desperately need to conceal those facts, which, if widely
    known, will be fatal to Islam.
  2. There is no right to be shielded from all
    criticism. Islam is not a living person and has no human rights in any
  3. Moe died in 632, he can not be injured
    by revelation of his evil character.  Islam is not a living person
    and has no  right  to be shielded from criticism.
  4. When any Imam shouts “Jihad”,
    he violates this provision.  The Qur’an violates this provision in
    the following ayat [and others]:  2:216, 8:39, 9:29, 9:123. The authentic hadith collection of Imam
    Bukhari violates this provision in these ahadith [and others]: 1.8.387, 4.52.177. Shari’ah violates this provision in the Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.
    It is therefore necessary that Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition,
    jurisprudence & exegesis be proscribed by law and Islam be outlawed
    because it inculcates hatred and incites violence.
  5. Congress is prohibited from enforcing
  6. Congress is prohibited from censoring
    truthful and passive expression; the movie can not be censored because
    it is truthful and does not exhort viewers to violent acts.

September 13, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment


%d bloggers like this: