Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

The need for renewed attention to the Islamophobia phenomenon


The need for renewed attention to the Islamophobia

A/HRC/24/NGO/122

Written statement* submitted by the Organization for

Defending Victims of Violence, a non-governmental

organization in special consultative status

The need for renewed attention to the Islamophobia phenomenon

    Twelve years ago, more than 3,000 innocent people

were victimized by violent terrorists. Our government failed to protect

them.  Those who died in the abominable attacks can not be

defended. Those maimed and terrorized can only be defended by

eliminating the the ideology which motivated the attackers.

    This is a case of self-described defenders of

victims defending the attacker instead of the victims. It is an

inversion of morality and denial of objective factual reality.  I

am making an H1 heading out of each pertinent point in the first

paragraph, and revealing the truth with evidence from Islam’s canonical

texts including the Qur’an, hadith and Islamic law. [All emphasis added

for clarity.]

“Islamophobia can be described a enmity

and hatred towards them or illogical fear from

Muslims. This definition includes discrimination against Muslims in the

form of rejecting

them from political, economic, social and public life, believing in the

subjugation of Islam

and Muslims towards the West and the assumption of Islam being a

political and violent

ideology and not a religion.”

enmity & hatred

5:14.

And from those who call themselves Christians, We took their covenant,

but they have abandoned a good part of the Message that was sent to

them. So We planted amongst them enmity and hatred

till the Day of Resurrection (when they discarded Allâh’s Book,

disobeyed Allâh’s Messengers and His Orders and transgressed beyond

bounds in Allâh’s disobedience), and Allâh will inform them of what

they used to do.  

illogical fear

    Terrorism is infliction of fear.  What is

illogical about that reaction to vicious attacks and continued

threats? 

rejecting

    Is it possible for a rational and informed person to

avoid rejecting Islam and its adherents?  How can a rational and

informed person fail to demand the expulsion and exclusion of potential

terrorists from our soil? 

subjugation

    Follow this

link to Surah At-Taubah 9:29 and and read each of the thirty odd

parallel translations.  Do

expressions such as  “brought low”, “humbled”,”state of

subjection” mean anything to you? 

    Follow this link to The Reliance of the Traveller,  Book O11.5

and read about the social restrictions imposed upon conquered

Christians by Shari’ah. We are not allowed to ring church bells,

display crosses, hold public processions, pray aloud in public or build

new churches.

political

    Islam does not separate the temporal and spiritual

realms, it conflates them. Mosque and state are one entity. Muhammad

ran both as autocratic dictator. Islam must replace all unislamic

governments as unjust and tyrannical. Muslims are obligated to

conquer and convert the entire world.

13:41. See they not that We gradually reduce the land (of

disbelievers, by giving it to the believers,

in war victories) from its outlying borders. And Allâh judges, there is

none to put back His Judgement and He is Swift at reckoning.

14:15. But they (the Messengers) sought victory

and help [from their Lord (Allâh)], and every obstinate, arrogant dictator

(who refuses to believe in the Oneness of Allâh) was brought to a complete loss and

destruction.

“Islam wishes to destroy all

states and governments

anywhere on

the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and

programme of

Islam regardless of the country or the Nation which rules it. The

purpose of Islam is to set up a state on the basis of its own ideology

and

programme, regardless of which nation assumes the role of the

standard-bearer of

Islam or the rule of which nation is undermined in the process of the

establishment of an ideological Islamic State. Islam requires the

earth—not just a

portion, but the whole planet—not because the sovereignty over the

earth should

be wrested from one nation or several nations and vested in one

particular nation,

but because the entire mankind should benefit from the ideology and

welfare programme or what would be truer to say from ‘Islam’ which is

the

programme of well-being for all humanity.” [Jihad in Islam–Maududi pg. 10]

“In

the Muslim community, the holy war is a

religious duty, because of the

universalism of the (Muslim) mission and (the obligation

to) convert

everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force. Therefore,

caliphate and royal authority are united in (Islam), so that the person

in charge can devote the available strength to both of them 408at the same time.” [Ibn Khaldun–Muquaddimah Ch. 3.]

violent

    Allah said something about violence: he issued

commands to engage in it, threatening Muslims who shirk with Hell fire and promising those who fight admission

to his celestial bordello

2:216. Jihâd (holy

fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is ordained for you

(Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing

which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you.

Allâh knows but you do not know.

8:39.

And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism:

i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will

all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease

(worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer

of what they do.  

8:59. And let not those

who disbelieve think that they can outstrip (escape from the

punishment). Verily, they will

never be able to save themselves (from Allâh’s Punishment).

8:60. And make ready

against them all you can of power, including steeds of war

(tanks, planes, missiles, artillery, etc.) to threaten the

enemy of Allâh and your enemy, and others besides whom, you may not

know but whom Allâh does know. And whatever you shall spend in

the Cause of Allâh shall be repaid unto you, and you shall not be

treated unjustly.

9:29. Fight against

those who

(1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that

which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who

acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people

of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay

the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with

you, that when

you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you

cling heavily to the earth?

Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter?

But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with

the Hereafter.

9:39. If you march not

forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will

replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and

Allâh is Able to do all things.

9:111.

Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their

properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in

Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed.

It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah)

and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his

covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have

concluded. That is the supreme success .

9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of

the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find

harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the

Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).

61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that

will save you from a painful torment.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ),

and that

you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and

your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If

you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens

under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of

‘Adn ­ Eternity [‘Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great

success.

    The founder of Islam, damnation be upon him,

confirmed the obvious and let us know what he thinks of us. Our blood

and property are not sacred to Muslims, its open season and we have no

human rights.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered

to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped

but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla

and slaughter as we slaughter,

then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will

not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with

Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik,

“O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He

replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but

Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our

slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and

obligations as other Muslims have.”

    Islamic law codifies those damnable imperatives. The

Shafi’i school’s  “The Reliance of The Traveller”, Book I, Chapter

9 codifies the law of Jihad.

O9.0 defines Jihad as “war against non-Muslims”,

deprecating Jihad an-Nafs, which CAIR and other liars swear by.  O9.1

discusses the communal obligation to attack passive infidels in every

year, declaring all who know of the obligation to be in sin if it is

not performed when possible.  O9.8 

declares that “The caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians and

Zoroastrians until…”, citing 9:29 as its scriptural basis.  The

next section declares that “The caliph fights all other peoples until

they become Muslim.”.  O25.9, item 8 declares it a duty of subordinate

rulers bordering on infidel lands to wage war and distribute the

plunder.

    The Hanifi school’s Hedaya, Volume II, pg. 140,

declares that “War must be carried out by some party of the Muslims at

all times.” and “Destruction of the sword is incurred by Infidels

although they be not the first aggressors. “. 

not a religion

    The “original religion” of Islam is Jihad: waging

war against the rest of the world. Jihad is preferred as a way of life

over trade, commerce and agriculture. If Muslims abandon Jihad, Allah

will curse them. 

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number

3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction,

hold the tails of oxen, are

pleased with agriculture, and give up

conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over

you, and will not withdraw it until you

return to your original religion.

    Obtain a clue, for Chrissake!!! The mission of Islam

is mercenary, not spiritual.  All we need to prove that fatal fact

is a few ayat & ahadith.  How many camels can a stone idol

ride and eat? How much money can it spend?  Who gets the

spoils?  What is Allah’s prime motivating factor? What was Moe’s

prime motivator?  Those are clues for all whose brains are not

between their buttocks.

8:1. They ask you (O Muhammad ) about the spoils of war.

Say: “The

spoils are for Allâh and the Messenger.”

So fear Allâh and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey

Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), if you are believers.

8:41. And know that whatever of

war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned

to Allâh, and to the Messenger,

and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad )], (and also)

the orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have

believed in Allâh and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad

) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the

two forces met (the battle of Badr) – And Allâh is Able to do all

things.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet

that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with

ransom) until he had made a

great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the

good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the

captives), but

Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty,

All-Wise.

    Moe wanted ransom money, Allah wants genocide. Got a

clue yet?   Allah saw Moe’s weakness & humility and made

spoils lawful for him.  Yeah, right.  Allah, what a great

idol: he gave Moe the keys to the treasures of the world, enriched him

through conquests and made him victorious with terror!

Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4327:

The spoils of war were not made

lawful for any people before us, This is because Allah saw our weakness and humility

and made them lawful for us.


Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 37, Number 495:

    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Whenever a dead man in debt was brought to Allah’s

Apostle he would ask, “Has he left anything to repay his debt?” If he

was informed that he had left something to repay his debts, he would

offer his funeral prayer, otherwise he would tell the Muslims to offer

their friend’s funeral prayer. When Allah made the Prophet wealthy

through conquests, he said, “I am more rightful than

other believers to be the guardian of the believers, so if a Muslim

dies while in debt, I am responsible for the repayment of his debt, and

whoever leaves wealth (after his death) it will belong to his heirs. “

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:

Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:

The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given

to any one else before me.

1. Allah

made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a

distance of one month’s journey.

2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for

praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my

followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.

3. The booty has been made Halal

(lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.

4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of

Resurrection).

5. Every Prophet used to be sent to

his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:

 Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the

shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made

victorious with terror (cast

in the hearts of the enemy), and while

I was sleeping, the keys of the

treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.“

Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you,

people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not

benefit by them).

    I am selecting the most important paragraphs for

criticism. use the title link to read the entire report in

context. 

“For example according to a poll in

2010, only 37 percent of Americans had positive views

of Islam,1 and according to another poll in the same year

around one third of American

voters believed that Muslims should not be allowed to run for president.2

This trend is on

the rise in America, to an extent that in 2011 Americans’ positive

views towards Islam has

dropped to 30 percent.3

    More than one third of Amrericans suffer from

analencephalopathy, which is why Obama was elected our first Muslim

Traitor.  Public opinion is trending against Islam because more

people are becoming informed, learning about the damnable doctrines and

practices of the war cult.

“The ODVV believes that if

international human rights bodies had timely intervened and taken

proper measures against religious extremism, the roots of most of these

problems would

have been dried both in the Middle East and the West. The United

Nations failure in timely

and genuine concentration on the subject of dialogue among

civilizations and religions, and

also failure in serious confrontation with any form of insulting

individuals religions, and

failing to clarify the boundaries between freedom of expression and

defamation have all

resulted in most of these dormant processes to rejuvenate again.”

extremism

    Terrorizing and subjugating minorities is not

extremism; it is standard operating procedure in Islam.  If the

Security Council had wanted to suppress terrorism including hijacking

and fraggings, the Soviet Union would have vetoed any such move because

the PLO was their client and cat’s paw. Suppressing terrorism requires

eliminating Islam entirely. Nobody in power is willing to propose that,

much less to take effective action.

    Believers have sold their souls to Satan for

admission to his celestial bordello. They fight in his cause: world

domination, killing and being killed.  Allah promises admission to

his bordello for participation in Jihad. He promises extra credit

toward an upgrade for any act to injure or enrage disbelievers.

He threatens shirkers with eternal damnation.  Terrorists are

believers, trying to earn brownie points, not extremists. While there

are believers there will bn genocidal conquest and terrorism.

dialogue

    There is nothing to say to Islam except “Go to

Hell!”.  Anything else is submission, and we who love life &

liberty will not submit. There is no common ground between us and those

who have sworn enmity and eternal warfare.

insulting Islam

    In Islamic law, slander is “anything the hearer

might not like”. Truth is not a defense. Any negative expression about

Islam, Allah or Moe gets a dhimmi killed. I disrespectfully direct

doubters, deniers & dissenters to The Reliance of The

Traveller:  R2.2, O8.01, O8.7O11.10.and O9.14.

freedom of expression & defamation

    Bitching bitterly about insulting or defaming Islam

is part of the campaign to outlaw all criticism of the war cult so that

we will not be able to name and shame the enemy.  Describing the

damnable doctrines and practices of Islam as I have done in this blog

post, with reference to its canon of scripture, tradition and

jurisprudence, would be punishable by death under Shari’ah.  We

who are aware and alert are not willing to submit to that.  We

have a First Amendment right to share our knowledge and our resolve

with our fellow citizens. We will not yield that right!

    By exploiting “Islamophobia”, Muslims hope to erect

a legal shield to prevent all questioning and criticism of their war

cult. The character, sayings and actions of the cult’s founder

discredit it, so we must be prevented from uttering & publishing

the fact that Moe married a six year old girl and consummated the

marriage when she was nine years old.  We must be prevented from

revealing his having sex with prisoners of war. We can’t mention the

fact that he suborned murder and assassination.  Allah forfend our

mentioning his racism. 

    A good offense is the best offense. 

Disrespectfully demand that Islam be defrocked, stripped of  first

amendment protection and expelled from America. 

September 15, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu on Islamophobia at OIC-CFM 39


Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu on Islamophobia at OIC-CFM 39

An excerpt from a statement
by Prof. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu Secretary General of the Organization of
Islamic Cooperation
at the Thirty-Ninth Session of the Council of
Foreign Ministers of OIC Member States Date: 15/11/2012 –

[All emphasis and links added.]





Islamophobia
remains a source of great concern for us. We have, at the
OIC, exerted considerable and dedicated efforts to combat this
phenomenon whose pace has increased recently as shown in the reports of
the OIC Islamophobia Observatory, the last of which is the fifth report
submitted to you. We have raised this issue with political and
religious elites we have met in different parts of the world,
underscoring its dangerous impacts on the prevalence of international
peace and security.
 




Thanks to these efforts, we managed to convince the UN Human Rights
Council, consistent with the eight points I proposed, to adopt the
consensual resolution 16/18 which
includes a genuine condemnation of
the defamation of religions
and discrimination against people on
religious grounds. Paragraph 6 of the resolution provides for the
adoption of measures to criminalize incitement to violence based on
religion or belief. The UN General Assembly adopted the resolution by
consensus under number 66/167.
 




To enhance the chances of these two resolutions being implemented on
the ground, I put forward ‘the Istanbul process’ initiative in July
2011 which reaffirms the two resolutions, followed by a similar
initiative in Washington in December of the same year. A third
initiative will follow in England in the name of the European Union in
December this year. Meanwhile, we are still struggling to overcome the
obstacles preventing the actual implementation of these initiatives.
The adoption of these two consensual resolutions by the UN Human Rights
Council and the General Assembly respectively is indeed a positive
development that gives us the opportunity to concentrate on important
issues away from politicization and polarization. It also gives us the
opportunity to introduce the ‘Istanbul Process’. I am convinced that
the confidence-building efforts exerted in the ‘Istanbul Process’
meeting and approved by international and regional stakeholders will
pave the way for increased confidence and cooperation between all
parties.
 




After the launch of the defamatory film ‘Innocence of Muslims’ which
insults Islam and Prophet Mohammad (PBUH), and the subsequent disorders
which caused many deaths including the killing of the US Ambassador in
Libya, I condemned in the strongest terms the film, the killing of US
officials and the attack on the US Embassy in Cairo, insisting that the
expression of anger and condemnation should not be through killing or
the destruction of property. Moreover, we issued a joint statement with
the European Union, the League of Arab States and the African Union
denouncing strongly the perpetrators of these crimes.

 


Islamophobia

Phobia implies an irrational fear or loathing.
Exactly what is irrational about fearing a war cult which has sent an estimated 270*106  people to
early graves
?  Exactly what is irrational about loathing
a war cult whose doctrine declares
perpetual war against us
, denies the sanctity of our lives & property,
denies our human rights
and imposes the death penalty on us because we do
not join it
?

peace and security

International peace & security are not
threatened by fear & loathing of Islam. Peace and security are not
negatively impacted by factual exposure of the damnable doctrines &
practices of Islam. Peace and security  are threatened by the damnable doctrines of Islam and the
efforts of Muslims to implement those doctrines.

Muslims riot and raise Hell because of their
arrogance, supremacism & triumphalism; roused by the rabid rants of
their Imams at Jumah Salat, not because of anything we utter and
publish.  Take a fresh, close look at FITNA
and what Ban Ki-moon said about it.  The movie is not hate speech
neither is it incitement, it is an exposure of hate speech and
incitement.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,”
Ban said in a statement. “The right of free
expression is not at stake here.

 

defamation
of religions

Elimination of the defamation meme from the most
recent UN resolutions was the critical selling point that facilitated
their passage by acclamation.  If the defamation provisions had
remained in the resolutions, tere would have been votes, many of them
against the resolutions.

Take a fresh, close look at how human rights NGOs
praised and celebrated the new resolutions and how I condemned
them.  My analysis is confirmed, Article 19 & Human Rights
First are shown to be willing victims of al-Taqiyya.

Previous resolutions complained bitterly about
associating Islam with terrorism:

L.32/Rev.1 Elimination of all
forms of intolerance and of discrimination based on religion or
belief  Oral
revision not reflected in this version.

10.
Also emphasizes that no religion should be equated with terrorism, as
this

may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom
of religion

or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned;

————————————————————————————–

7. Expresses deep concern, in this respect, that Islam is frequently
and wrongly

associated with human rights violations and terrorism; [combating
defamation
 / vilification
of Islam
]

Who created the association? Moe did it! The proof
is outlined below the horizontal line with citations to the Qur’an,
hadith, tafsir & Sira.  This
is what they are bitching about; what they seek to outlaw. They want to
persecute me, fine, imprison and decapitate me for revealing these
fatal facts to you.

Web definitions:
a false
accusation
of an offense or a malicious misrepresentation of
someone’s words or actions.

wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

Falsity is a critical element of defamation.
If it ain’t false, it ain’t defamatory.  Exactly what is false in FITNA?
Exactly what is false in the outline of fatal facts below?

defamatory film ‘Innocence of
Muslims

Exactly what part of The Innocence of Muslims
is false?   Here is my documentation of the video:  http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the

Is terrorism intrinsic to Islam or is it not?
Was Moe a bastard? Neither hadith nor Sira indicate that, is it really
important? His paternity has been a subject of scholarly
speculation.  He did claim, in one hadith, to be Christ’s paternal
half brother.

Did Moe hide under his wife’s skirt? Yes, he did,
its in the Sira.  Did her cousin fake the Qur’an? I doubt it, I
find no evidence for it, but the bit about the gap in revelations is in
the Sira.

Did Moe converse with a donkey? It is in an obscure
book by Ibn kathir and it is found in the Encyclopedia of
Canonical Hadith
.

Was Moe a lecher? Did he put words in the idol’s
mouth to sanction it? Yes, its in the hadith.   Was Moe an
extortioner? Yes, his extortion letters are on record.  Did he
marry a six year old girl?  Yes, its in the hadith and Sira.

Did he have an old lady murdered? Yes, its in the
Sira.  Did he have Kinnana tortured to death? Yes, but not exactly
as depicted.  Its in the Sira.

Did he do it with Miriam in Hafsa’s bed?  Yes,
its in the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.  Was Moe queer?
Did he jigger his camels? I don’t know, I did not see it in the movie
and I did not find it in the books.  I bring that up because I
found another analysis of the trailer to which I have added links. It
is included  immediately below.   I find that, on the
whole, the trailer is not false and defamatory, its major conceptual
content is true.

[Note: the file linked here is 141MB. It will be easier to obtain hard
copy from Amazon.  The alternative is to load it once and use the
page numbers in subsequent links to navigate through the pdf.]

http://www.islam-watch.org/authors/139-louis-palme/1166-muslim-rage-over-innocence-of-muslims-film-should-deference-or-factuality-cover-for-defense.html

Thanks to Louis Palme for sending us the following references:

Was the “Innocence of Muslims” video trailer accurate?

Most of us have seen “Innocence of the Muslims” the film trailer that
sparked rioting which resulted in over 50 dead and millions of dollars
of damage.  …

Listed below are the scenes (by time-stamp and theme) along with the
references to Islamic sacred texts that provide support for the
assertions:

3:02 – Muhammad’s father is unknown. (His father died before he was
born, and his mother never raised him.) Ishaq, The Life of Muhammad,
para. 105

Page 68 on pdf 58 mentions marriage & conception of Moe through
death of Abdullah.  I found no
uncertainty about . Moe’s parentage.

http://archive.org/download/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah.pdf#page=58

3:45 – Young Muhammad taking orders from and married to older Khadija –
Ishaq, para. 120


http://archive.org/download/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah.pdf#page=65

4:43 -Muhammad buries his face in Khadija’s garments to determine if
visions are divine or satanic – Ishaq, para. 154


http://archive.org/download/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah.pdf#page=77

5:24 – Khadija’s cousin Waraqa is a Christian scholar who helped
Muhammad – Ishaq, para. 121

pg.  83 on pdf 65


http://archive.org/download/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah.pdf#page=65

5:43 – Muhammad’s revelations stopped when Waraqa died, prompting him
to consider suicide – Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 6, No. 478

http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/060.html#006.060.478

6:27 – Muslims used booty for their income – Quran Surah 48:20


http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=
48&l=eng&nAya= 20# 48_ 20

See also Book 53 of Sahih Bukhari:  http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/053.html#004.053.324

6:35 – “Muhammad is our messenger and the Quran is our constitution.”
— taken from the Muslim Brotherhood oath

Article
Eight
: The Slogan of the Hamas

Allah is its goal, the Prophet its model, the Qur’an its
Constitution, Jihad its path and death for the case of Allah its most
sublime belief.”

http://www.thejerusalemfund.org/www.thejerusalemfund.org/carryover/documents/charter.html

7:19 – Muhammad given special privileges regarding women and marriage –
Quran Surah 33:37-38

http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=
33&l=eng&nAya= 37# 33_ 37

8:37 – Muhammad is linked to Allah in authority and worship – Quran
Surahs 3:32, 4:80, 8:20, 9:71, 24:47, 24:54, 47:33, 61:11, 64:8. 64:12,
and many others

Use link above, then navigation tools at the top of the page to select
other Surahs and ayat.

9:11 – Abu Bakr gives his nine-year-old Aisha in marriage to
fifty-five-year-old Muhammad — Sahih al-Bukhari Vol. 5, No. 234

http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/058.html#005.058.234

9:27 – Muhammad and Omar are “gay.” (With nineteen wives and
concubines, Muhammad had very few children and no male heirs.)
References to bizarre sexual behavior can be found in Sahih al-Bukhari,
Book 4, No. 143, Sahih al-Bukhari, No. 2393, and Sahih Muslim, Nos.
3663 and 3674. The story about Omar apparently comes from this Shiite
cleric’s speech: http://ibloga.blogspot.com/2012/06/london-based-shiite-cleric-yasser-al.html

http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/004.html#001.004.143

I do not find No.2393 in Khan’s translation, there is nothing sexual in
Aisha’ Bewley’s 2393. Sahih Muslim 2393 is also innocent. Muslim
10.3663 is innocent, likewise 10.3674.

11:15 – An elderly woman, Umm Qirfa, is torn in two by two camels –
Ishaq, para. 980


http://archive.org/download/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah.pdf#page=357

11:32 – “Whoever refuses to follow Islam has only two choices – pay
extortion or die.” – Quran Surah 9:29

http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=
9&l=eng&nAya= 29# 9_ 29

12:38 – Torture of Kinana bin al-Rabi (a Jew) in front of his wife,
Safiya, who Muhammad later raped – Ishaq, paras. 764 – 767


http://archive.org/download/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah.pdf#page=282

13:10 – Fight between Muhammad and two of his wives – Hafsa and Aisha –
when he is caught in bed with Hafsa’s Coptic slave Maryah after he had
promised not to sleep with her. This is the subject of Quran Surah 66.

http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=
66&l=eng&nAya= 1# 66_ 1

13:43 – “Every non-Muslim is an infidel; their land, women and children
are our spoils.” – Ishaq, para. 484


http://archive.org/download/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah.pdf#page=188

http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=
8&l=eng&nAya= 67# 8_ 67

http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=
33&l=eng&nAya= 26# 33_ 26

http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/muslim/019.html#019.4327

 

The Innocent Prophet

Imran Firasat’s upcoming video is sure to outrage
Muslims. Here is the trailer. Note: Firasat has juxtaposed Chapter
& Verse. [Big deal.] The military intelligence offices of the U.S.
& Canadian governments have been seeking information about this
video, presumably because they expect it to influence enemy activity
against our forces in the field.

They should learn tha fatal facts of Islam herein
referenced and wise up to the fact that Islamic violence is doctrine
driven, not grievance driven.

Did the Almighty Creator select as his final Prophet
and Messenger an unrepentant pederast, lecher, false prophet, murderer
and genocidal warlord?  Or is Islam the world’s most successful
con game?

If Moe was a false prophet and Islam is a con game;
a continuing criminal enterprise guilty of war crimes against humanity,
then why in Hell should warning the world about it be a criminal
offense?

If Moe was a true Prophet, Allah is the Almighty
Creator and Islam is true, a perfect religion innocent of offensive,
genocidal & terrorist conquest then post proof in a comment: refute
each and every fatal fact presented and documented below the horizontal
line.  Good luck with that.


November 25, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

All In The Family: Shaima Alawadis: Not Victim of Islamophobia!


All In The Family: Shaima Alawadis: Not Victim of Islamophobia!

Thanks and a tip of the hat to Bare Naked Islam! A few readers with elephantine
memories will recall the mysterious battery of Shaima Alawadis which
precipitated her death.  An obviously forged note was produced,
casting suspicion on an unknown “Islamophobe”. The usual line up of
self-righteous AssWholes proceeded to do their ritual
song & dance blaming “Islamophobia” & ‘hate speech” implying
that “right wing extremist” bloggers caused her death.

Months after the echo of the song reverberated their
last notes, an arrest has been made in the infamous case. The person
arrested is not an Islamophobe inspired to  murder by “extremist”
blog posts.  He is Shaima’s husband.  Her death has the
hallmarks of honoricide.

How convenient to blame her  death on
those who  sound a warning about the damnable doctrines &
practices of Islam including  genocidal conquest, slavery,
barbarian rapine & terrorism.   If the  government
would only silence us, Shaima would still be alive.  Yeah,
right.  I will not hold my breath waiting for an apology
from the LibTards & AssWholes.



View more videos at: http://nbcsandiego.com.

More related stories with numerous
polemical images linked at Bare Naked Islam, linked above.

 

We are all Shaima!

Shame on you: AssWholes! If married to a Muslim, you
very well could join her in the hospital if not the cemetery.  You
exploited a brutal murder for political gain, unjustly accusing the
innocent of  inspiring & inciting murder.  [Emphasis
added.]

4:34. Men are the protectors
and maintainers of
women
, because Allâh has made one of them to
excel the othe
r, and
because they spend (to support them) from their means. Therefore
the righteous women are devoutly obedient (to Allâh and to their
husbands), and guard in the husband’s absence what Allâh orders them to
guard (e.g. their chastity, their husband’s property,
etc.). As to those women on whose part you see ill­conduct,
admonish them (first), (next), refuse to share their beds, (and last) beat them
(lightly, if it is useful), but if they return to obedience, seek not
against them means (of annoyance). Surely, Allâh is Ever Most
High, Most Great.

The parenthetical “lightly, if it is useful”  is not in the
original Arabic text.  Source:  Corpus Quran

(4:34:28)

l-maḍājiʿi

the bed

N – genitive masculine plural
noun

اسم
مجرور
(4:34:29)

wa-iḍ’ribūhunna

and [finally] strike them.

CONJ – prefixed conjunction wa (and)

V – 2nd person masculine
plural imperative verb

PRON – subject pronoun

PRON – 3rd person feminine
plural object pronoun

الواو
عاطفة

فعل أمر والواو ضمير متصل في محل رفع فاعل و«هن» ضمير متصل في محل نصب
مفعول به

(4:34:30)

fa-in

Then if

REM – prefixed resumption
particle

COND – conditional particle

الفاء
استئنافية

حرف شرط

Alternative translations:  http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/4/34/
Tafsir Ibn Kathir teaches against severe beating.

Indeed Moe told his followers not to beat their
wives severely, but in doing so, he let the cat out of the bag. This
text is found on page 651of The Life of Muhammad.

You have rights over your wives and
they have rights over you. You

have the right that they should not defile your bed and that they should

not behave with open unseemliness. If they do, God allows you to put

them in separate rooms and to beat them but not
with severity
. If they

refrain from these things they have the right to their food and clothing

with kindness. Lay injunctions on women kindly, for they are prisoners

with you
having no control- of their persons
. You have taken them only

as a trust from God,3 and you have the enjoyment of their
persons by the


words of God, so
understand (T. and listen to) my words, 0 men, for

I have told you.

———————————-

3. *bi amanati ilah* This is a difficult phrase. It is probably to be
understood in the sense

of Sura 8. 27 and more particularly 33. 72 where the Quranic
commentators differ widely.

See Lane, 102a.

The oral traditions of Moe’s companions amplify the
concept for us.  Moe first told his companions not to beat their
wives, then he revised his order. And don’t beat your wife as you would
your slave girl.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 11, Number 2139:

Narrated Mu’awiyah al-Qushayri:

I went to the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) and asked him:
What do you say (command) about our wives? He replied: Give them food
what you have for yourself, and clothe them by which you clothe
yourself, and do not beat
them, and do not revile them
.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 11, Number 2141:

Narrated Abdullah ibn AbuDhubab:

Iyas ibn Abdullah ibn AbuDhubab reported the Apostle of Allah
(peace_be_upon_him) as saying: Do not beat Allah’s
handmaidens,
but when Umar came to the Apostle of Allah
(peace_be_upon_him) and said: Women have become
emboldened towards their husbands
, he (the Prophet) gave permission to beat
them
. Then many women came round the family of the Apostle of
Allah (peace_be_upon_him) complaining against their husbands. So the
Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) said: Many women have gone round
Muhammad’s family complaining against their husbands. They are not the
best among you.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 1, Number 0142:

Narrated Laqit ibn Sabirah:

I was the leader of the delegation of Banu al-Muntafiq or (the
narrator doubted) I was among the delegation of Banu al-Muntafiq that
came to the Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him). When we reached the
Prophet, we did not find him in his house. We found there Aisha, the
Mother of the Believers. She ordered that a dish called Khazirah should
be prepared for us. It was then prepared. A tray containing dates was
then presented to us. (The narrator Qutaybah did not mention the word
qina’, tray).

Then the Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) came. He asked:
Has anything been served to you or ordered for you? We replied: Yes,
Messenger of Allah. While we were sitting in the company of the
Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) we suddenly saw that a shepherd
was driving a herd of sheep to their fold. He had with him a newly-born
lamb that was crying.

He (the Prophet) asked him: What did it bear, O so and so? He
replied: A ewe. He then said: Slaughter for us in its place a sheep. Do
not think that we are slaughtering it for you. We have one hundred
sheep and we do not want their number to increase. Whenever a ewe is
born, we slaughter a sheep in its place.

(The narrator says that the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) used the
word la tahsabanna, do not think).

I (the narrator Laqit) then said: Messenger of Allah, I have a
wife who has something (wrong) in her tongue, i.e. she is insolent. He
said: Then divorce her. I said: Messenger of Allah, she had company
with me and I have children from her. He said: Then ask her (to obey
you). If there is something good in her, she will do so (obey); and do not beat your
wife as you beat your slave-girl.

I said: Messenger of Allah, tell me about ablution. He said:
Perform ablution in full and make the fingers go through the beard and
snuff with water well except when you are fasting.

Honoricide

The Qur’an depicts the killing of a boy who was
expected to dishonor his parents by taking the wrong path.  The
murder was in anticipation of the birth of a better child who would be
obedient and not sinful.

18:74. Then they both proceeded, till they met a boy, he (Khidr) killed him.
Mûsa (Moses) said: “Have you killed an innocent person who had
killed none? Verily, you have committed a thing “Nukra” (a great
Munkar – prohibited, evil, dreadful thing)!”

18:80. “And as for the boy, his parents were
believers, and we feared lest
he should oppress them by rebellion and disbelief.

18:81. “So we intended that their Lord should
change him for them for one better in righteousnes
s and near to
mercy.

Shari’ah provides no retaliation for killing one’s
offspring or grandchildren.  This is from page 584 of Reliance of
the Traveller.

O1.2 The following are not subject to retaliation:…

(4)  a father or mother (or their fathers or

mothers) for killing their
offspring, or offspring’s


offspring;

Muslims & LibTards: kindly kiss my big, smelly,
deformed & ulcerated foot!

November 9, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , | 1 Comment

Innocence of Muslims Update: OIC Demands Blasphemy Law


Pakistan
addressed the General Assembly on behalf of the OIC.  They demand
international  imposition of Islamic blasphemy law. It is
necessary to highlight their AssWholliness
& hypocrisy; that is the mission of this blog post.  They are
bitching about Innocence of Musalims, Charlie Hebdo’s outrageous
cartoons and Qur’an burning.  Carefully examine the video and
answer these questions:

  1. What does the video say about Muhammad and the cult he founded?
  2. Is it true or false?
  3. Where is the hate they are bitching about?
  4. Where is the incitement they are bitching about?

http://www.eyeontheun.org/assets/attachments/documents/10570item_9_Pakistan_on_behalf_of_OIC.pdf

STATEMENT BY PAKISTAN ON BEHALF OF THE
OIC IN THE GENERAL

DEBATE UNDER AGENDA ITEM 9

Madam President,

I have the honour to make this statement on behalf of the OIC,

The OIC Group unequivocally condemns the recent production of a film in
the

United States called “The Innocence of Muslims” which tries to defame Islam and the

personality of the Holy Prophet Muhammad
(peace be upon Him). This film is a blatant

attempt to provoke religious
hatred
, discrimination
and intolerance
that has led to unfortunate

loss of life and damage to property. In this context, we also strongly
condemn the violence

that resulted in the deaths of a number of people including a US
diplomat.

We note that the Secretary
General of the United Nations, The High


Commissioner for Human Rights
and the President of the United States
have also expressed

their opposition to the film.

Incidents like this clearly demonstrate the urgent
need on the part of States to

introduce adequate protection against acts of hate crimes, hate speech,
discrimination,


intimidation and coercion
resulting from defamation and negative stereotyping of religions,


and incitement to religious
hatred, as well denigration of venerated personalities.

Over the past months, there have been a number of
examples of acts of

incitement to hatred.
These include despicable incidents involving the burning of the Holy

Quran, and the publication of
defamatory cartoons
. OIC countries have repeatedly called on

the Governments concerned to take action to avert these offensive actions but nothing
has

been done on the excuse that such action would be a violation of the freedom of expression.

The OIC underlines that the situation created by the malicious act affirms once
more the

urgency for all States to fully uphold their obligations under
international law”, in particular

articles 19 and 20 olf ICCPR and article 4 of the International

Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination

We disagree. These are not exercises in freedom of expression but deliberate  attempts


to discriminate, defame,
denigrate and vilify Muslims and their beliefs.
Such acts

constitute flagrant incitement
to violence and are therefore in contravention of ICCPR


Articles 19 and 20. It
is therefore abundantly clear that there exists an urgent need to
establish

an internationally acceptable
threshold between freedom of expression and incitement to


violence and hatred.

The OIC has
never advocated any prohibitions on freedom of expression
.
Our

emphasis has been on the need to examine the consequences of unchecked,
unbridled and

irresponsible statements and
actions
made by certain groups and individuals that deliberately

instigate and incite violence
on the basis of religion or belief.
This can include situations

involving religious minorities
or situations in which minorities react violently
either in their

home societies or in societies where their co-religionists are in a
majority.

None of.this is completely uncharted territory. For
instance, we are all aware of

the fact that laws exist in Europe and other countries which impose curbs on anti-Semetic

speech, holocaust denial or
racial slurs
. We need to acknowledge, once and for all, that

Islamophobia in
particular and discrimination on the basis of religion and belief are

contemporary forms of racism
and must be dealt with as such. Not to do so would be a
clear

example of double standards. Islamophobia has to be
treated in law and practice equal to the


treatment given to
anti-Semitism, especially in the legislations. –

We recall the general comment 11 of the Human Rights
Committee and

general comment of the Committee on Elimination of Racial
Discrimination which confirm.

that restricting the freedom of expression on issues relating to racial
discrimination applies

. also for incitement to religious hatred.

The OIC’s resolution on “Combating Intolerance,
Negative Stereotyping And

Stigmatization of; and Discrimination, Incitement to Violence, and
Violence against Persons

based on Religion or Belief” adopted by consensus at the 16th
session of the Human Rights

Council on 24 March 2011, was a concrete attempt: to address this very.
concern by bringing

all the key players on board. The consensus resolution was the -result
of a long and often,

difficult negotiation process.

The OIC welcomes the joint statement by the OIC
Secretary general, Arab

League Secretary general, African Union Commissioner for Peace and
Security and European

Union High Representative for foreign and Security policy in which they
shared the profound

respect for all religion and refuse to, allow religion to be used to
fuel provocation,

confrontation and extremism. They reiterated their strong commitment to
take further

measures and to work for an international consensus on tolerance and full respect of
religion
,       <<<

including on the basis of UN Human rights Council resolution 16/18.

At the heart of the resolution are a series of
practical steps to be taken by states

to combat the ever increasing instances of intolerance, negative stereo-typing,
stigmatization


and discrimination and violence
all over the world. This core issue has been approached in a

manner that is acceptable to
all
so that all stake-holders are bound by the commitments

contained in the text. The OIC believes that there is an urgent need to
take concrete steps

towards the implementation of the plan action contained in the
resolution to avoid the

occurrence of such condemnable
incidents in the future
. If this is not done, there is a very real

chance of a
breakdown of the delicate consensus on this issue as reflected in the
resolution


which would be
unfortunate for all of us.

The OIC remains ready to work with its international
partners at the Human

Rights Council in Geneva, the UN General Assembly in New York to
address and resolve

these critical issues in order to better protect and promote
human rights as well as peace and .


security within our
respective societies.

We also call upon the High Commissioner and her
Office to assist this . important effort.

I thank you.

 

tries to defame

If you were trying to defame someone with a video,
would you derive its dialogue from his original hagiographic biography
and the most authentic oral traditions from his companions?  In
Western legal tradition, defamation involves malicious falsehood.
Exactly what is false about the video’s depiction of Moe?

deliberate provocation

What does the video have to do with religious
hatred, discrimination and intolerance?  It illustrated the hatred
of Muslims who, when they can do it with impunity, murder Christians
and destroy their property.  What is provocative about that? Must
the news media be prevented from reporting on religiously motivated
violence in Africa. Arabia and Asia because it might be
provocative?  What was Moe’s attitude toward infidels? Was it
accurately depicted in the video? What is provocative about that?

unfortunate loss of life

How did the video lead to loss of life? How many of
the rioters saw the video? The riots were deliberately stirred up by
mass media and rabid rants in the mosques. Fortune had nothing to do
with murder and destruction, they are intended effects of the damnable
doctrines of Islam.

What did Christians destroy and whom did they kill
over “Piss Christ” and “The Holy Virgin Mary”?  What is the
difference between Christians and Muslims or their respective doctrines
that explains the widely divergent reactions to disturbing
images?  What did Jesus do?  What did Moe do?  Whom do
Muslims emulate?  Do the murders of Kab Ashraf, Asma Bint Marwan
and Um Qirfa ring a bell?

appeal to authority

The listed authority figures are full of fecal
matter so that it comes out their mouths, which I pointed out in
several blog posts. It ain’t who you know, it is what you know. I know
that the conceptual content of the video is true according to Islam’s
canon.  I know that there is no rational basis for condemning the
video.  I know that the listed authority figures are scared
witless of Islam and seek to appease Muslims.  I do not accept
them as an argument for censorship.

hate crimes, hate speech…

Hate crimes and hate speech do not flow from
defamation or negative stereotyping, they flow from hate. The riots in
Egypt and murders in Bengazi are the fruit of wala wal bara:
“love and hate for the sake of Allah”. Those are hate crimes, for which
the criminals constantly seek pretexts. That is low intensity warfare,
a doctrine borrowed from the Soviets and their ‘non aligned’ clients.

Moe hated Jews and Christians because they perceived
the fraudulent nature of the cult he contrived to ensnare them with
perverted and distorted stories from their scriptures and apocryphal
books. The first surah of the Qur’an reminds Allah why he should want
to burn us. Muslims recite it 17 times each day.  The second surah
says that we are cursed by Allah, angels and men.  The third tells
Muslims that they are the best of peoples raised up for mankind as they
drag us to Islam in chains.  It also tells Muslims that if they
attack us, we will do them no harm.

defamation

It ain’t defamatory unless it is false and
malicious.  Did the video defame Moe when it reported that he
thought he was demon possessed and tried to kill himself?  Before
answering, perhaps you should refer to the first book in Sahih Bukhari
and Ibn Sa’d’s  hadith collection.  Did the video defame Moe
when it depicted him as a pedophile?  Perhaps you should go to
your favorite hadith search engine and look up “six years old” before
answering that. Muttawir ahadith testify to Aisha’s age at marriage and
consummation, with one hadith giving her age as seven.

Did the video defame Moe when it depicted him as a
lecher?  Did he really divert Hafsa from the bedroom on her night
in order to tryst with her slave girl?  Dig into Volume 9 of the
Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, page 88 if memory
serves.   And the murder of Kinana & rape of his widow,
Safiya? True or false?  Look it up in Guillaume’s The Life of
Muhammad and Tabari’, if memory serves, its in Vol. 8.  And the
talking donkey?  Ishaq reveals that it was paid in tribute by an
Egyptian ruler, along with the slave girl and her sister.  The
part about the interview with the donkey is in the Encyclopedia of
Canonical Hadith.

And the command to wage war, killing the men and
enslaving their widows and orphans, is that true? If you read the
Qur’an, surahs 8, 9 & 33, you know the answer.

stereotyping

The video does not say anything about Muslims other
than Moe and his companions who are long since dead.  How does it
stereotype Muslims?  Moe defined and exemplified Islam.  33:21 tells Muslims if they want to meet Allah in
a positive way, they had better emulate Moe.  3:32
tells them to Obey Allah & Moe.  What Moe was, pious believers
are to the extent that they know his sunnah and are able to emulate
it.

If Moe channeled Satan instead of God, which he did,
then in stead of worshiping God, Muslims worship his adversary.
If Moe revealed situational scripture, which he did, then Muslims
follow a fraud: a false prophet.    When we expose the
truth about Allah & Moe, we expose Muslims as demon’s slaves and
members of a crime syndicate.

incitement to religious hatred

How does the video incite religious hatred?
And what is the foul if it did?  Should not an impious fraud which
has murdered millions and enslaves billions be hated?  Exposing
evil is not incitement.  Doing evil is incitement. The terrorism,
riots & murders,. not cartoons, books & videos cause us to hate
Islam.

denigration

Moe was venal, not venerable, Guillaume’s The
Life of Muhammad
and The Sealed Nectar
display the true character and works of Moe; should they be banned for
denigration of a venerable personality?

acts of incitement

Uttering & publishing Innocence of Muslims
is not an act of incitement, it is an act of education:: showing
viewers a fair sample what Moe was and what he did.  The Qur’an is
an insulting incitement; Allah told Moe to recite it in a low voice to
avoid stirring up the pagans.

(And offer your Salah neither aloud nor in a low voice,) Ibn `Abbas
said: “When he prayed with his Companions, he would recite Qur’an
loudly, and when the idolators heard that, they insulted the Qur’an,
and the One Who had revealed it and the one who had brought it. So
Allah said to His Prophet

What was Moe doing when he recited these ayat? How
does recitation of these verses and the rest of the 164
violent verses
comport with ICCPR
19 & 20 CPPCG
3 and ICERD
4?

1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way

1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned
Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as
the Christians). 

3:85. And whoever
seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never
be accepted
of
him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.

3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism,
and real followers of Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal
ways, etc.)] are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind;
you enjoin
Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and
forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has
forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the
Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for
them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are
Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s
Command).

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.” means, the best of
peoples for the people, as you bring them
with chains on their necks
till they embrace Islam
.

3:111. They will do you no
harm, barring a trifling annoyance
; and if they fight against
you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped.

3:112. Indignity is put over
them wherever they may be
, except when under a covenant (of
protection) from Allâh, and from men; they have drawn on themselves the
Wrath of Allâh, and destruction
is put over them
. This is because they disbelieved in
the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.)
of Allâh and killed the Prophets without right. This is because they
disobeyed (Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh’s
disobedience, crimes and sins).

8:39. And fight them until
there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping
others besides Allâh) and the religion
(worship) will all be for Allâh Alone
[in the whole of the world
]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then
certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet
that he should have prisoners of war
(and free them with ransom)
until he had
made a great slaughter
(among his
enemies) in the land. You
desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the
captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is
All-Mighty, All-Wise.

9:29. Fight
against
those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among the people of the Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until
they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves
subdued.

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that
when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd)
you cling heavily to the earth?
Are you pleased with the life of
this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of
the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.

9:39. If
you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment

and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all,
and Allâh is Able to do all things.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the
believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs
shall be the Paradise. They fight in
Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed
. It is a
promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the
Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than
Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is
the supreme success .

9:120. It was not
becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins
of the
neighbourhood to remain behind
Allâh’s Messenger
(Muhammad  when fighting in Allâh’s Cause)
and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer their own lives to his
life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor
hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any
step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an
enemy
but is written to their
credit as a deed of righteousness
. Surely, Allâh wastes not the
reward of the Muhsinûn

9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who
are close to you,
and let them find harshness in you, and know
that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see
V.2:2).

61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that
will save you from a painful torment.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ),
and that
you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and
your lives
, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive
you your sins, and admit you into Gardens
under which rivers
flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn ­ Eternity [‘Adn (Edn)
Paradise], that is indeed the great success.

offensive actions

Publishing videos, cartoons and books along with
burning the Qur’an are symbolic actions which do no objective
harm.  Burning churches, murdering Christians, bombing mass
transit and flying hijacked aircraft into office buildings are
offensive actions which incite us to utter and publish the truth about
Islam.

freedom of expression.

Amendment I

Congress
shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging
the freedom of speech, or of the press
; or the right of
the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a
redress of grievances.

 

George Washington:

If the freedom of speech is taken away
then dumb and silent we may be
led, like sheep to the slaughter.

Since Islam declared and is prosecuting war upon us
it is necessary that we be able to discuss it with honesty, accuracy
and clarity.  The War College and West Point need to be free to
give full and honest instruction in the doctrines and laws of Islam in
the training of our officer corps.  Censorship and political
correctness must be rolled back and stamped out!

Imposition of Islamic blasphemy law would make
Thomas Jefferson a criminal for uttering & publishing his report to
Congress.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

The
ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the
Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all
nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that
it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could
be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and
that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure
to go to heaven.

malicious act

Publishing Innocence of Muslims
is not a malicious act, it simply makes available, for those who wish
to view it, an accurate depiction of a segment of the Life of
Moe.  Rousing the rabble to attack our Embassy & Consulate and
murder our Ambassador and staff were malicious acts.

Enforcement of human rights covenants

is indeed an urgent matter.  The International
Criminal Court must open a case condemning Islam for incitement to war,
racial supremacism and incitement to genocide.  Because Islam
perpetrated the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides and seeks to
commit genocide against Jews, it must be condemned and proscribed by
law.

OIC never advocated

prohibition of free expression; never?  You demanded that Holland
block release of Fitna and
Wilders’ book. You demanded that Denmark prosecute the publisher of the
Motoons.
You promoted the passage of UN resolutions condemning and demanding the
criminalization of criticism of Islam and you demand persecution of the
creator of Innocence
of Muslims
. But you never advocated abridgment of the right of
free speech: Camelshit!

consequences

Cartoons, videos, books and statements do not have
consequences. The barbarian behavior of Muslim mobs is a consequence of
the rabid ranting of Imams at Jumah Salat, not anything we do.
Muslims exploit anything we say or do as a pretext for barbarism but
pretext is not causation, it is rationalization. Ladies and
gentlemen:  Get a God blessed clue for Chrissake!!! I present for
your edification a sentence of Shari’ah from Hedaya, the code of the
Hanifi school of fiqh.

The destruction of the sword  is
incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as
appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
generally received this effect. [
http://www.archive.org/stream/hedaysorguide00hamigoog#page/n154/mode/1up]

minorities react violently

Did Copts burn mosques when Piss Christ and The Holy Virgin Mary
were put on display as ‘art’?  When  Muslims ‘react
violently’, they exemplify the damnable doctrines of Islam and their
own AssWholliness, which alone are the
causes of their violence.

Curbs

on antisemitism & holocaust denial exemplify European stateism, the
USA does not emulate them because of our First Amendment. We allow free
and open debate, secure in the belief that truth will triumph in a
level venue.  Those restrictions on European free speech  do
not serve as a positive model for imposition of Islam’s blaspemy
law.  Islam seeks to prohibit all criticism of Allah, Moe and
their damned war cult because they are indefensible; our factual
evidence and logic can not be refuted. Islam can not prevail in free
debate, so it must silence all critics by force just as Moe
commissioned the assassinations of his critics.

racism

What race is Islam?  Its founder and first
adherents were Arabs but it has conquered and forcibly converted
Africans, Asians and Caucasians.  The existence of both Black and
White Muslims  and the ability to become Muslim without changing
one’s skin pigment or physiognomy serve to devastate the accusation of
racism in thinking minds.  Hurling that epithet is the  last
refuge of  scurrilous politicians and AssWholes.

Islamophobia

Phobia is an irrational fear. After the Accursed
Abomination 11 years ago, we are fully aware of the fact that Islam is
a worthy object of fear, loathing and execration, death & damnation
be upon it! Islam inculcates hatred and incites genocidal
violence.  Hatred of Islam is well founded and rational, not
irrational.

legislation

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/defamation-of-religions-background-info/
contains links to the documents you should read to get a good grip on
the issue of the legislation demanded by the OIC.

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2011/12/21/big-lie-un-drops-call-to-outlaw-defamation-of-religions/
tackles the issue of Res 16/18 in detail.

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2012/09/20/ad-hoc-cmte-war-on-free-speech/

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2010/03/20/ad-hoc-committee-new-resolutions/
This pair of blog posts will acquaint you with a parallel process
running below the radar of mass media.  The Ad Hoc Committee on
Elaboration of Complementary Standards meets for ten days each spring
and fall for the purpose of coding Islam’s blasphemy laws into a
binding protocol to ICERD.  If they succeed and the President
signs the damn thing, kiss the First Amendment  goodbye
forever.  The Iranian proposal and the non paper paper are
essential to understanding what they propose to do.

tolerance & respect

Tolerance is a two way street. Islam is intolerant.
Go back and re-read 3:85 and the context of 3:110. That is
intolerance, not tolerance.  How in Hell can anyone who declares
perpetual war against Jews & Christians
lecture us about
tolerance?  Only by supreme AssWholliness!

Respect must be earned; Islam has not earned it and
is no more respectable than it is tolerable.  I can not tolerate
propagation of the idea that my blood and property are not sacred; that I have
no human rights and its open season.  I can not tolerate that
which declares and war against me.

I can not respect a G’d’d demon who demands genocide
as the price of admission to his Celestial Bordello. I can not respect a pederast
who claimed divine sanction for his marriage to his
best friend’s six year old daughter.  I can not respect a
false prophet who attributed to his idol what his idol did not say, asserting divine sanction for his sexual proclivities.

promote peace and security

The highlighted clause in this sentence fragment is
a thinly veiled threat:  threatening violence if we do not submit
to censorship. By God, I will never submit!!!

…to
address and resolve these critical issues in order to better protect and promote
human rights as well as peace and .


security within our
respective societies.

Peace and
security can only be promoted by making Islam extinct.

September 28, 2012 Posted by | Ahadith, GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Islamophobia: Projected Bigotry


When Muslims and LibTards accuse critics of Islam of “Islamophobia” bigotry and racism, they are projecting their own attitudes onto us.  They suffer from an irrational fear of criticizing Islam, that is the phobia.   They stubbornly ignore or reject  factual evidence of the evil nature of the war cult, that is the bigotry.  They harbor a secret white guilt, assuming that only members racial minorities can have virtue, that is the racism.   But Islam is a predatory way of life, neither a race nor a religion.

Mayor Peter Swiderski and his city board published a screed against AFDI’s informational bill board.  Links to the story follow.
http://www.westernjournalism.com/ny-mayor-free-speech-must-not-violate-political-correctness/
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/08/destroyers-vandalize-islamorealism-ads.html

“While the Board respects everyone’s right to free speech,” they wrote, “we categorically condemn the bigotry and innuendo expressed by this billboard message. To tar a faith and its followers because of the actions of a few is deplorable, hateful and morally repugnant.”

The Billboard:  “19,250 Islamic attacks since 9/11: It’s not Islamophobia, it’s Islamorealism.

Where does that number come from: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/  has charts listing the attacks year by year.

projection

bigotry and innuendo

Bigotry as defined by  http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bigotry

1.

stubborn and complete intolerance of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one’s own.
2.

the actions, beliefs, prejudices, etc., of a bigot.

 

Bigotry is the extreme hatred of one group resulting from severe prejudicial attitudes.

The Mayor and Council presented no evidence of bigotry on the part of AFDI, they assumed it, that is bigotry and innuendo.  They are projecting their own attitudes onto AFDI.

the message

Opposition to Islam is not irrational, it is well founded based on the number of terror attacks in the last eleven years.

the omission

The Islamic doctrines which make Islam inimical to the peace and security of the human race in general and America in particular will not fit conveniently on a billboard.  A list of the doctrines, with the evidence of their meaning and application will not fit conveniently in a blog post either, so I will outline a selection of the most important doctrines with links to relevant Qur’an verses, hadith and Shari’ah. .

 

To tar a faith

The billboard does not tar Islam based on the actions of a few.  It simply refutes the bigoted accusation of  “Islamophobia”. Islam must be judged on its doctrines; its canon of scripture, exegesis, tradition & jurisprudence as well as its fruits: 270,000,000 early deaths since 622.

tarring the watchmen

AFDI and others are sounding a crucial warning about an advancing enemy which will never rest until we are conquered because they believe their eternal destiny: fire or paradise, to be a function of  “fighting in Allah’s cause”.  LibTards will not learn from history because they ignore it.  The territories of the Byzantine and Persian Empires were mainly Christian, now they are dominated by Islam.  India was Hindu and Buddhist.  How did they come under Islamic domination?  What caused the Crusades?  What caused the Barbary Wars?

LibTards are incapable of answering those crucial questions.  They can only emote, using the calumnious buzz words of the day to tar critics of Islam. No bigoted LibTard will click through the links provided above to read the Qur’an, Sahih Bukhari , Sunan Abu Dawud, Tafsir Ibn Kathir and Reliance of the Traveller, bigots can’t be bothered with relevant, verifiable factual evidence, they are prisoners of raw emotion.

Notice to Muslims & LibTards:

Keep on bitching about “Islamophobia”; we will exploit your corrupt, idiotic complaints as  opportunities to drive home the fatal facts of Islamic doctrine and practice which must not be ignored.  Islam is not a religion, it is a predatory way of life founded for the purpose of the personal emolument of its founder.  The relevant quotes from Islam’s canon are included in this blog post:  “Islam’s Mercenary Mission“.  Islam is not peaceful; it is genocidally violent, by design.  The documentation of this fatal fact is contained in this blog post:  “What’s Wrong With Islam & Muslims?“.

Notice to Pastors, Priests & Rabbis:

Muslims assert that Jesus and the Old Testament Prophets were Muslims.  Yeah, right, Jesus Christ is a genocidal warlord who will lead the Muslims in their final genocide.  Doubt this?  Can you absorb relevant factual evidence?  Will you? It is contained in this blog post:  “The Defamation of Jesus Christ“; do you have the courage to learn the truth?

August 31, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Elimination of Racism and ‘Related Intolerance’


While fools and liars continue singing the praises of the Human Rights Council & OIC for abandoning the ‘Defamation of Religions [Islam]’ meme, the UN published one of the resolutions that went through the General Assembly like grease through a goose December 19  ’12: A/RES/66/144

Take note of the innocuous title; who can oppose the worthy cause of eliminating racism?

Global efforts for the total elimination of racism, racial
discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and
the comprehensive implementation of and follow-up to
the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action

The devil is in the details.  I highlighted a key phrase and clauses in the title; the evils they conceal while including by reference  make the resolution unacceptable.   The bureaucrats redefined racism: it no longer simply denotes irrational and invidious hatred of dark shinned people; it now connotes rational and well founded opposition to Islam.

Racism is explicitly redefined to include ‘Islamophobia’ in a preliminary report created in the preparatory stages of the second Durban Conference.

4.  Emphasizes the urgent need to address the scourges of anti-Semitism, Christianophobia, and Islamophobia as contemporaryforms of racism as well as racial and violent movements based on racism and discriminatory ideas directed at African, Arab, Christian, Jewish, Muslim and other communities;[Preliminary document of the African Regional Conference Preparatory to the Durban Review Conference]

Re-read that quotation with special attention to the highlighted words and phrases.  There is nothing racial about opposition to Islam. There are Black, White and Asian Muslims; Islam is not a race.  Islam is an ideology, system of laws  and military force to spread and establish it.

‘Related intolerance’, included in the boiler plate of numerous resolutions, translates to ‘Islamophobia’. The global effort is to eliminate ‘Islamophobia’. Its intent is to criminalize and punish rejection of and opposition to Islam.

The phrase “comprehensive implementation of” in the third line of the title applies to the Durban Declaration. Who is familiar with its contents?  Here  is a clear demand for the enactment & enforcement of legislation to criminalize  the formation of anti-Islamic political parties.

150. Calls upon States, in opposing all forms of racism, to recognize the need to
counter anti-Semitism, anti-Arabism and Islamophobia world-wide, and urges all States to take
effective measures to prevent the emergence of movements based on racism and discriminatory
ideas concerning these communities;

The Durban Declaration also demands that we not scrutinize those most likely to engage in terrorism. The perpetrators of the Accursed Abomination were young Muslim males, not little old ladies.

72. Urges States to design, implement and enforce effective measures to eliminate the
phenomenon popularly known as “racial profiling” and comprising the practice of police and
other law enforcement officers relying, to any degree, on race, colour, descent or national or
ethnic origin as the basis for subjecting persons to investigatory activities or for determining
whether an individual is engaged in criminal activity;

The Durban Declaration also demands censorship, including of the internet.

89. We note with regret that certain media, by promoting false images and negative
stereotypes of vulnerable individuals or groups of individuals, particularly of migrants and
refugees, have contributed to the spread of xenophobic and racist sentiments among the public
and in some cases have encouraged violence by racist individuals and groups;
90. We recognize the positive contribution that the exercise of the right to freedom of
expression, particularly by the media and new technologies, including the Internet, and full
respect for the freedom to seek, receive and impart information can make to the fight against
racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance; we reiterate the need to respect
the editorial independence and autonomy of the media in this regard;
91. We express deep concern about the use of new information technologies, such as
the Internet, for purposes contrary to respect for human values, equality, non-discrimination,
respect for others and tolerance, including to propagate racism, racial hatred, xenophobia, racial
discrimination and related intolerance, and that, in particular, children and youth having access
to this material could be negatively influenced by it;

145. Urges States to implement legal sanctions, in accordance with relevant
international human rights law, in respect of incitement to racial hatred through new information
and communications technologies, including the Internet, and further urges them to apply all
relevant human rights instruments to which they are parties, in particular the International
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, to racism on the Internet;
146. Urges States to encourage the media to avoid stereotyping based on racism, racial
discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance;
147. Calls upon States to consider the following, taking fully into account existing
international and regional standards on freedom of expression, while taking all necessary
measures to guarantee the right to freedom of opinion and expression:
(a) Encouraging Internet service providers to establish and disseminate specific
voluntary codes of conduct and self-regulatory measures against the dissemination of racist
messages and those that result in racial discrimination, xenophobia or any form of intolerance
and discrimination; to that end, Internet providers are encouraged to set up mediating bodies at
national and international levels, involving relevant civil society institutions;
(b) Adopting and applying, to the extent possible, appropriate legislation for
prosecuting those responsible for incitement to racial hatred or violence through the new
information and communications technologies, including the Internet;

What is the meaning of incitement to racial hatred or violence?  How are those terms evaluated in the real world?  According to Ban Ki-moon, they include exposing the nexus between Islamic doctrines expressed in Islamic scripture & tradition and Islamic violence in terrorism & rioting.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

The Secretary General explicitly said that Geert Wilders had no right to utter & publish Fitna, which displayed Islamic doctrines of jihad beside video of rabble rousing sermons and pictures of the resulting havoc.  The texts cited by Wilders are documented in this blog post: https://snooper.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/fitna-supporting-documentation/

A/RES/66/144 ‘s threat to free expression is not limited to its inclusion by reference of the Durban Declaration.

6. Expresses deep concern at inadequate responses to emerging and
resurgent forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance,
and urges States to adopt measures to address those scourges vigorously with a view
to preventing their practice and protecting victims;
7. Underlines the imperative need to address all the contemporary forms
and manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related
intolerance, which include, inter alia, incitement to such hatred, racial profiling and
the propagation of racist and xenophobic acts through cyberspace, with a view to
maximizing protection for victims, providing legal remedies and combating
impunity;
8. Stresses that States and international organizations have a responsibility
to ensure that measures taken in the struggle against terrorism do not discriminate in
purpose or effect on grounds of race, colour, descent or national or ethnic origin,
and urges all States to rescind or refrain from all forms of racial profiling;
9. Recognizes that States should implement and enforce appropriate and
effective legislative, judicial, regulatory and administrative measures to prevent and
protect against acts of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related
intolerance, thereby contributing to the prevention of human rights violations;

¶ 11 on page 4 is very clear.

11. Reaffirms that any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that
constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by
law, and also reaffirms that the dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority or
hatred, or incitement to racial discrimination, as well as all acts of violence or
incitement to such acts, shall be declared offences punishable by law, in accordance
with the international obligations of States, and that those prohibitions are
consistent with freedom of opinion and expression;

The Secy’. Gen’l. labeled Fitna hate speech & incitement not protected by the right of freedom of expression.  Take a clear eyed look at the last sentence in ¶ 11 above.  It says that prohibitions on advocacy of religious hatred are consistent with freedom of expression.  Fitna is an exposure of religious hatred, it is not advocacy of hatred!  The enemies of liberty invert facts, law and morality. There is no truth or virtue in them.

14. Calls upon all States, in accordance with the commitments undertaken in
paragraph 147 of the Durban Programme of Action, to take all measures necessary
to combat incitement to violence motivated by racial hatred, including through the
misuse of print, audiovisual and electronic media and new communications
technologies, and, in collaboration with service providers, to promote the use of
such technologies, including the Internet, to contribute to the fight against racism, in
conformity with international standards of freedom of expression and taking all
measures necessary to guarantee that right;

¶ 15 demands that we convert our schools into Islamic indoctrination centers; inculcating tolerance of intolerable evil. .

15. Encourages all States to include in their educational curricula and social
programmes at all levels, as appropriate, knowledge of and tolerance and respect for
all cultures, civilizations, religions, peoples and countries, as well as information on
the follow-up to and implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of
Action;

The resolution also alludes to an ad hoc committee of the HRC, without revealing its mandate.

Taking note of Human Rights Council decision 3/103 of 8 December 2006,2 by
which, heeding the decision and instruction of the World Conference, the Council
established the Ad Hoc Committee of the Human Rights Council on the Elaboration
of Complementary Standards,
Noting also the progress made during the third session of the Ad Hoc
Committee on the Elaboration of Complementary Standards, held in Geneva on 22
and 23 November 2010 and from 11 to 21 April 2011, and noting further the
convening of the fourth session, to be held in Geneva during 2012,

64. Requests the Secretary-General to provide the resources necessary for the
effective fulfilment of the mandates of […] the Ad Hoc Committee on the Elaboration of Complementary Standards

The committee’s mandate is to code a binding protocol to ICERD which will incorporate therein criminalization of everything the OIC is kvetching about: Fitna, the Motoons, International Burn the Koran Day, International Judge the Koran Day and every negative statement about Allah, Moe and their damnable war cult.   Their next meeting begins April 10.  Unlike these resolutions, the protocol will be binding and enforcible.  If you would like to know more about it, make good use of these resources:

March 29, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Islamophobia: I Slam Islam!


Today’s UN email listed a document from The Organization for Defending
Victims of Violence whose about us page states that they were founded in
Tehran.

Regular readers of my posts know that I consider
every instance of kvetching & caterwauling about Islamophobia as a
teachable moment: an opportunity to redouble my condemnation of the
world’s most evil institution.

A/HRC/19/NGO/130
appears to have been composed in another language and translated into
English.  I am dipping a few choice floaters from the septic tank
for detailed refutation.  Use the link at the beginning of this
paragraph if you desire to immerse yourself in the sewage.

incorrect and
nonsense interpretation

Only one man was fully qualified to interpret Islam:
the man who “revealed” it.  Moe exemplified
Islam in his speech & conduct while not “revealing” the
Qur’an.  Exegetes use parallel ayat & relevant hadith
to determine what each ayeh means.

Tafsir Ibn Kathir is detailed & loquacious but
looking up ayat is not an easy task. I suggest using the search engine
at http://www.qtafsir.com/Tafsir al-Jalalayn & Tafsir Ibn Abbas are older, less detailed and have
pick lists for selecting the surah & ayeh numbers.

Moe’s “revelations” & sunnah are codified in
Shari’ah. Reliance of the Traveller, a 1251 page tome which
can be purchased from Amazon, is widely accepted and certified as
authentic & accurate by sheikhs at Al-Azhar.  Turn to Book O, Chapter 9 for the damnable details of
offensive warfare: its definition, communal obligation, practical
application and regulations.

Risala is the code of the Maliki school of Islamic
jurisprudence. It is less wordy and more legible than Reliance. Chapter 30 covers jihad.  Hedaya is the code
of the Hanifi school, arcane, dense and printed in an archaic type
face.  Volume II, Book IX, Chapter I confirms the
offensive & perpetual nature of jihad in stark terms.  The second chapter fills in some gaps concerning
jizya: its punitive purpose, substitution for execution &
humiliating
collection procedure.

associate “Islam” to “terrorism”

Why would we think of Islam when terrorism is
mentioned?  In the ’70s, hijacking airliners & fragging
airline terminals were popular activities in various parts of the
world.  Who perfected those arts?  Who has been waging a war
of terror against Israel for more than sixty years?  Who
perpetrated the attacks on New York, London. Madrid, Beslan &
Mumbai?

Muslims do not want us to learn of the terror nexus
in Islam’s scripture & tradition but, so long as the First
Amendment is in force, I will reveal that connection. Allah said
something about the subject. Of course the terror of the day of
judgment is irrelevant.  Note the highlighted phrases in the
quotes below.

  • 7:4.
    How many a township have We destroyed! As a raid by night, or while
    they slept at noon, Our
    terror
    came unto them.

    • (How
      many a township) people of townships (have We destroyed) We tormented!
      (As a raid by night) or day, (or while they slept at noon, Our terror)
      Our punishment (came unto them). [Tafsir Ibn Abbas]
  • 3:151.
    We shall cast
    terror

    into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in
    worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode
    will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists
    and wrong­doers).

    • Allah then mentioned the defeat of the unbelievers on
      the Day of Uhud, saying: (We shall cast terror) fear of you such that
      they run from you
      (into
      the hearts of those who disbelieve) the unbelievers of Mecca (because
      they ascribe unto Allah partners, for which no warrant hath been
      revealed) either in a Scripture nor taught by a messenger. (Their
      habitation) their dwelling-place (is the Fire, and hapless the abode of
      the wrong-doers) the dwelling-place of the unbelievers is the Fire.

      [Tafsir Ibn Abbas]
  • 8:12.
    (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you,
    so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror
    into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the
    necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes
    .”

    • (When
      your Lord inspired the angels) it is also said that this means: when
      your Lord commanded the angels, ((saying:) I am with you) I will help
      you. (So make those who believe stand firm) in war; it is also said
      that this means: give those who believe the good news of victory. (I
      will throw) cast (fear into the hearts of those who disbelieve) the fear of Muhammad
      (pbuh) and his Companions
      . (Then smite the necks) their heads
      (and smite of them each finger) each shaped finger.
      [Tafsir Ibn Abbas]
  • 8:57.
    Therefore, if you overcome them on the battlefield, deal with them very
    sternly, so as to
    strike terror among them
    , and to serve as a lesson for their
    successors. Perhaps, they would remember! [Dr.
    Munir Munshey &
    Dr.
    Kamal Omar

    • (If thou comest on them) if you imprison them (in the
      war, deal with them so
      as to strike fear

      in those who are behind them) such that they serve as a lesson to those
      who are behind them, (that haply they may remember) i.e. take
      admonition and avoid breaking their treaties.
      [Tafsir Ibn Abbas]
  • 8:60.
    Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power,
    including steeds of war, to strike terror
    into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies, and others
    besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know. Whatever ye
    shall spend in the cause of Allah, shall be repaid unto you, and ye
    shall not be treated unjustly.[Abdullah Yusuf Ali]

    • Make
      ready for them, for fighting them, whatever force you can, the Prophet
      (s) said that this refers to ‘archers’, as reported by Muslim, and of
      horses tethered (ribāt is a verbal noun, meaning, ‘restraining them
      [for use] in the way of God’) that thereby you may dismay,
      terrify
      ,
      the enemy of God and your enemy, namely, the disbelievers of Mecca, and
      others besides them, that is, other than those — namely, the hypocrites
      or the Jews, whom you know not: God knows them. And whatever thing you
      expend in the way of God, its requital, shall be repaid to you in full,
      and you will not be wronged, [you will not] be diminished anything
      thereof. [Tafsir al-Jalalayn]
  • 33:26.
    And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the
    disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into
    their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of
    them) you made captives.

    33:27.
    And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their
    riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is
    Able to do all things. 

    • And
      He brought down those of the People of the Scripture, namely, the
      [Banū] Qurayza, who had supported them from their strongholds (sayāsī
      is the plural of sīsa, and is that in which one fortifies himself
      [against an enemy]) and He cast terror
      into their hearts, [so that] some, of them, you slew,
      and these were
      the combatants, and some, of them, you took captive
      , namely,
      their
      children. [Tafsir al-Jalalayn]
  • 59:2.
    He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the
    Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their
    homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get
    out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from
    Allâh! But Allâh’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they
    expected it not, and He cast terror
    into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with
    their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you
    with eyes
    (to see). 

    • It
      is He Who expelled those who disbelieved of the People of the
      Scripture, namely, the Jews of the Banū al-Nadīr, from their homelands,
      [from] their dwellings at Medina, at the first exile, that is, their
      exile to Syria, the last [exile] being their banishment to Khaybar by
      ‘Umar during his caliphate. You did not think, O believers, that they
      would go forth, and they thought that they would be protected
      (māni‘atuhum is the predicate of an, ‘that’) by their fortresses
      (husūnuhum, the agent of the verb [māni‘atuhum], with which the
      predication is completed) from God, from His chastisement. But God, His
      command and His chastisement, came at them from whence they had not
      reckoned, [from whence] had never occurred to them, from the part of
      the believers, and He
      cast terror (ru‘b or ru‘ub) into their hearts
      , by having their
      chief Ka‘b b. al-Ashraf slain, destroying [as they did] (read
      yukharribūna; or yukhribūna, [derived] from [4th form] akhraba) their
      houses, in order to take away with them what they valued of wood and so
      on, with their own hands and the hands of the believers. So take heed, O you who
      have eyes!
      [Tafsir al-Jalalayn]
  • 59:13.
    Verily, you
    (believers in the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear
    in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh. That is because
    they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of Allâh).

Go back and re-read 8:57 in the light of the last
highlighted clause in 59:2. Muslms are to treat victims harshly so as
to strike terror in those behind them, their next anticipated victims.
In 59:2, we are told to take warning from the example of the Bani
An-Nadir. Intelligent readers will get a clue.

Allah’s Messenger also had words concerning terror,
fewer than Allah’s but so stark as to settle the matter beyond any
shadow of doubt.

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:

    Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:

    The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given
    to any one else before me.

    1. Allah
    made me victorious by awe
    , (by His frightening my enemies) for a
    distance of one month’s journey.

    2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for
    praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my
    followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.

    3. The booty
    has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone
    else before me.

    4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of
    Resurrection).

    5. Every Prophet used to be sent to
    his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:

    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the
    shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I
    have been made victorious with terror
    (cast in the hearts of the
    enemy), and while I was sleeping, the
    keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my
    hand.
    ” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and
    now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did
    not benefit by them).

Allah said that he would cast terror and that he
cast terror resulting in death, enslavement, destruction &
dispossession.  Moe said that he was made victorious with terror.
Can you get a clue?  Muslims, politicians, educators, clerics
& the media are liars when they deny the obvious connection between
Islam and terrorism: terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of
Islam.

Islamophobia

monolithic & static

There are many sects; which of the mainstream
schools of Islamic jurisprudence rejects the communal object of
offensive jihad?  How has Islam changed in the last 14
centuries?  How do you improve upon perfection?
How do you change that which is immutable?

  • None can
    change His Words.
    [6:115]
  • No change can
    there be in the Words of Allâh
    , this is indeed the supreme
    success. [10:64]
  • None can
    change His Words
    , [18:27]
  • No change let
    there be in Khalq­illâh
    (i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic
    Monotheism), that is the straight religion, but most of men know not.
    [Tafsir At­Tabarî, Vol 21, Page 41] [30:30}

separate

Where do Muslims assimilate? Where do they blend in,
drop their religious garb and language; where do they participate in
the labor economy?

no common values

“We love death more than you love life.” Their
highest aspiration is stated clearly in the motto of al-Ikhwan: “God
is our objective; the Quran is our constitution, the Prophet is our
leader; 
Jihad is our way; and death for
the sake of God is the highest of our aspirations
.”
[14][15]

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood]

Moe declared that he would love serial martyrdom as
reported in Sahih Bukhari 4.52.54.

Inferior

Could it be possible that there is good reason for
us to view Islam as inferior? What Muslim satrapy was not a primitive,
backwards, undeveloped pit of misery prior to the discovery of massive
oil reserves under the sand?

barbaric

Why would we associate Islam with barbarism? Perhaps
because of the Barbary Pirates? Or could it be because of chopping off
heads and hands? Could Allah’s bloodlust
for genocide
have some bearing on this?

violent

Why would Islam be viewed as violent and supportive
of terrorism? Could it be because of the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian
genocides? Could Allah’s jihad imperatives in 8:39
& 9:29,.
which are codified in Reliance of the Traveller, O9.8  & 9.9
have something to do with this perception?

political ideology

Perhaps Islam is perceived as political because it
conflates mosque and state. Could it be because Islamic law is derived
from the Qur’an?

criticism of the west is rejected

Islamic criticism is rejected because Islam
sees  the speck in our eye, while ignoring the beam in its
own.  With all its flaws, Western Civilization is far superior to
Islam.

discrimination

Islamic hostility should be used to justify
expulsion & exclusion of Muslims from Dar ul-Harb. Unfortunately,
our elected traitors lack the spinal fortitude to do what must be done
to preserve Western Civilization.

hostility

If we were not hostile to a war cult which seeks to
subjugate the entire world, we would be  suicidally insane.

divine religions

There is no good reason why the followers of divine
religions can not live together in peace.  Christianity &
Judaism are not in conflict.  Islam, the source of conflict, is
not a divine religion: it is demonic.  Only a demon would
deliberately create one group of people for the fire and another for
Paradise.  I refer to Moe’s creation myth contained in Malik’s Muwatta 46.1.2. Only a demon would set “great
slaughter
” as his Prophet’s admission to Paradise.

March 22, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, Reforming Islam, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

HRC19: Islamophobia; Censorship; on the March


A/HRC/19/NGO/130 
comes from the Organization for Defending Victims of Violence.
Such a nice name, surely it must represent the highest ideals of
morality, right?  Examine their About Us statement; They were
founded In Iran. The scope of their associations indicates that they
have the regime’s approval.

The Organization for Defending
Victims of Violence (ODVV) is a non-governmental, non-profit,
non-political organzation in Special Consultative Status to the
Economic and Social council of the United Nations (ECOSOC). The ODVV
was stablished in 1988 in Tehran and has been active in the field of
human rights and humanitarian activities.The ODVV is also associated to
the United Nations Department of Public Information (UNDPI), a
participatory of the NGOs Coalition for an International Court (based
in New York), and national coordinator of the Global March Against
Child Labour (based in New Delhi) which cooperated in a variety of
issues with international organizations and has working relations with
many NGOs in Iran and around the globe. The ODVV is also member of the
International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA), conference of Non
Governmental Organization (CONGO), and the International Movement for a
Just World.

Far from defending victims of violence, the document
which inspired this blog post shows that ODVV defends the damnable
institution which inculcates hatred & incites violence:
Islam.

The document is not easy reading; it was probably
written in Arabic or Farsi and translated. I will therefore pick out
the most interesting kernels from the spew of feces. Remember that this
crap flows from an enemy organ which pretends to be neutral,
apolitical; standing on moral & ethical high ground.

Islamophobia

Attempts to associate “Islam” to
“terrorism” which was amplified by some heads of state either
intentionally or unintentionally, caused the rise of a phenomenon
called “Islamophobia”; …

 

association

Islam = terrorism

The well founded
equation is one of the fatal facts Muslims bitch most bitterly about;
frequently cited in UN resolutions.

10.
Also 
emphasizes
that no religion should be equated with terrorism
,
[
A/C.3/66/L.48/Rev.1]

10.
Also emphasizes
that no religion should be equated with terrorism
,[
L.32/Rev.1]

5. expresses its deep concern that Islam is frequently and wrongly
associated with human rights violations and terrorism
,[U.N.
Resolution 62/154
,]

 

who associated Islam & terrorism?

Allah

[Hilali/Khan Noble Qur’an
unless otherwise noted.]

  • 3:151.
    We shall cast
    terror
    into the hearts of those who disbelieve
  • 8:12.
    I will cast terror
    into the hearts of those who have disbelieved,
  • 8:57.
    …to strike terror
    among…[Dr. Munir Munshey] … strike terror
    in…[Dr. Kamal Omar]
  • 8:60.
    …to strike terror…[Yusuf
    Ali] …you terrorize/terrify
    with it…[Ahmed Ali] … to terrify
    thereby…[Arthur John Arberry]
  • 33:26.
    …and cast terror,
    (so that) a group (of them) you
    killed
    , and a group (of them) you made captives.
  • 59:2.
    He cast terror
    into their hearts …
  • 59:13.
    Of a truth ye are stronger (than they) because of the terror in their hearts, (sent) by
    Allah
    ….[Yusuf Ali]

    • …Indeed, you
      strike more terror
      in their hearts than their fear of
      GOD….[Rashad Khalifa]

Muhammad

  • Sahih Bukhari
    • 1.7.331 ….Allah made me victorious
      by awe
      , (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one
      month’s journey.

    • 4.52.220I have been made
      victorious with terror

What did Allah say he would do?  What did Allah
say he did?  How did the Muslims prevail over and  kill the
men of one local Jewish settlement and enslave their widows and
orphans?  Why was Muhammad stronger than the Jews?  How was
Muhammad made victorious?  If you can not or will not answer those
easy questions, having read the previous paragraph, get a rope and
remove yourself from the gene pool; you are too stupid or evil to be
allowed to reproduce.

monolithic

Islam is seen as a monolithic
bloc, static and unresponsive to change.

Islam has a standard, set by the Qur’an and
exemplified by Muhammad’s sunnah.  Islam is what Allah said and
Muhammad
did; nothing else is Islam.

static

  • 5:3.
    …This day, I have perfected
    your religion for you
    , completed My Favour upon you, and have
    chosen for you Islâm as your religion….
  • 6:115.
    None can change
    His Words
    . …
  • 18:21.
    None can change
    His Words
    ,…
  • 10:64.
    No change can
    there be in the Words of Allâh,
    this is indeed the supreme
    success.
  • 30:30.
    No change let
    there be in Khalq­illâh
    (i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic
    Monotheism), …
  • 35:43.
    …So no change
    will you find in Allâh’s Sunnah
    (way of dealing)…
  • Sahih Bukhari 9.88.174 …Then I will say, ‘Far removed (from
    mercy), far removed (from mercy), those who changed (the religion)
    after
    me! “

Islam is perfected for Muslims; how do you improve
on perfection?  Allah’s words can not be changed; his way of
dealing with people will not change; how can you abrogate his command
to engage in terrorism & genocidal conquest?

alienation

Islam is seen as separate and
‘other’.
It does not have values in common with other cultures, is not affected
by them and does not influence them.

Allah explicitly forbids subordinate and equal
relationships between Muslims and others.  Muslims must be
dominant.

  • 4:144.
    O you who believe! Take
    not for Auliyâ’ (protectors or helpers or friends) disbelievers instead
    of believers
    . Do you wish to offer Allâh a manifest proof
    against yourselves?
  • 9:33.
    It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth
    (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions
    even though the
    Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness
    of Allâh) hate (it).

common values

Assuming that the hierarchy of needs you learned
about in Psychology class applies to Muslims is a critical error.
Islam deprecates this world in favor of Allah’s Celestial Bordello.

  • 6:32.
    And the life of this world is nothing but play and amusement. But far
    better is the house in the Hereafter for those who are Al­Muttaqûn (the
    pious – see V.2:2). Will you not then understand?
  • 6:70.
    And leave alone those
    who take their religion as play and amusement
    , and are deceived by the life
    of this world
    .
    But remind (them) with it (the Qur’ân) lest a person be given up to
    destruction for that which he has earned, when he will find for himself
    no protector or intercessor besides Allâh, and even if he offers every
    ransom, it will not be accepted from him. Such are they who are
    given up to destruction
    because of that which they have earned.
    For them will be a drink
    of boiling water and a painful torment
    because they used to
    disbelieve.

To Muslims, this world is of no worth; the Celestial
Bordello is everything, and Muslims in name only will go to Hell with
the disbelievers.  Bunkum you say?  No application in the
real world?  Then your brain is between your buttocks; be careful
when sitting or expelling gas.  I will quote two ahadith which
will clarify the issue for those with sufficient intellectual capacity.

  • Sahih Bukhari 4.52.54 …By Him in Whose Hands my
    life is! I
    would love to be martyred in Al1ah’s Cause and then get resurrected and
    then get martyred, and then get resurrected again and then get martyred
    and then get resurrected again and then get martyred. 
  • Sahih Muslim 20.4678 It has been reported on the
    authority of Jabir that a man said: Messenger of Allah, where shall I be if I am
    killed?
    He replied: In Paradise. The man threw away the
    dates he had in his hand and fought until he was killed
    (i. e.
    he did not wait until he could finish the dates).

Muhammad swore that he would love to be repeatedly
martyred & resurrected to be killed in battle again.  Some of
his companions threw away dates and fought to the death on being
promised admission to the Celestial Bordello.  Muslims do not
share our values.

inferiority

Islam is seen as inferior to the
West. It is seen as barbaric, irrational, primitive and sexist.

What has Islam created and perfected other than
terrorism? Most of the scientific & cultural benefits it lays claim
to were created or preserved by people subsequently conquered and
enslaved by Muslims.

Barbaric

Lapidation, amputation  & lashing; corporal
punishment, conquest & slavery mark Islam as barbaric.

irrational & primitive

The prescription of perianal hygiene with  three stones is modern and rational, yeah, right.

sexist

Allah told Muslims that their wives are chattel
property, literally
fields to be plowed
. Muslimas are deemed deficient in religion and intelligence.

Islam is seen as violent,
aggressive, threatening, supportive of terrorism and engaged in a
‘clash of civilizations’.

violent

Whatever gave us that notion? Was it the conquests
of Arabia, North Africa, India & South-East Europe? Was it the
Barbary Pirates? Was it the Bosnian SS divisions raised by Hajj Amin
Al-Husseini? Was it the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides?
Was it the many pogroms & wars against Israel?  Was it the
hijackings of airliners and a cruise ship?  Was it two bombings of
the World Trade Center?  Was it the bombings in London &
Madrid?  Or was it the Beslan & Mumbai Massacres?

Subsequent to the Accursed Abomination, a few of us
began delving into Islam’s cannon of scripture, tradition, exegesis
& jurisprudence.  What we discovered there confirmed the
obvious fatal fact.  I direct doubters & dissenters to the
following citations in Islam’s cannon:

aggressive

Almost all of Muhammad’s battles were offensive, not
defensive. Hedaya, the Hanifi school’s codification of Shari’ah, spills
the beans.

  • Text [Vol. II, Bk. IX, Ch.1, pg. 141]
    •     The destruction of the
      sword  is
      incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors
      ,
      as
      appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
      generally received this effect.
  • Marginal Note
    • Infidels
      may be attacked without provocation
      .

 

threatening

Allah commands Muslims, in Surah Al-Anfal 60, to maximize military strength
with which to threaten or terrify immediate and potential
enemies.

supportive of terrorism

As previously substantiated, terrorism is an
intrinsic sacrament of Islam.  This ayat is not included in the
list above.

  • 9:120.
    …That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger
    in the Cause of Allâh, nor
    they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any
    injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of
    righteousness
    ….

Any step taken to enrage or injure us earns a Muslim
credits toward an upgrade in Allah’s Celestial Bordello.  Jihad is
also carried out with the purse. Muslims are required to pay Zakat of
2% on accumulated wealth and financial transactions. One eighth of
Zakat must be paid to those “fighting in Allah’s cause.
Transactions in Shari’ah compliant finance, mortgages, insurance &
purchases of halal food all entail payment of Zakat.

  • h8.17: Those Fighting for Allah

    The seventh category is
    those fighting for Allah, meaning people engaged in Islamic military
    operations
    for whom no salary has been allotted in the army
    roster (O: but who are volunteers for jihad without remuneration).
    They are given enough to suffice them for the operation,
    even if affluent; of weapons, mounts, clothing, and expenses (O: for
    the duration of the journey, round trip, and the time they spend there,
    even if prolonged. Though nothing has been mentioned here of the
    expense involved in supporting such people’s families during this
    period, it seems clear that they should also be given it).

Islam is seen as a political
ideology and is used for political or military advantage.

 

political ideology

Muhammad consolidated political and military power
along
with religious power.  Since what Muhammad did is sunnah, Islam is
theocratic.  The fact is that Islam was contrived for Muhammad’s
personal emolument.  I direct doubters & dissenters to the
following evidence.:

 

military advantage

As evidenced above, Muhammad got his income by his
spear:  plunder & extortion.  By disguising his mafia as
a religion, he gained two advantages. First, he motivated his army with
threats of eternal damnation and promises of eternal carnality. Second,
he camouflaged his mafia so that many victims fail to recognze
approaching danger.

Criticisms made of the West by
Islam are rejected out of hand.

 

criticism rejected

We engage in plenty of self-criticism, we do not
need your input. Your criticism serves as a pretext for conquest.

Hostility
towards Islam is used to justify discriminatory practices towards
Muslims and exclusion of Muslims from mainstream society.

 

hostility

Islam has only itself to blame: it initiated
hostilities when we declared independence from England.  Visit
Wikipedia and look up the Barbary Wars.  There is nothing abnormal
about hostility toward sworn existential enemies.

discrimination

Muslims, because of Allah’s imperatives, threats
& promises, are inimical to the west.  Only fools fail to
discriminate friend from foe. Because our leaders are treacherous
fools, we frisk little old ladies when we should exclude Muslims from
all mass transit.

exclusion

Our survival depends on wising up and expelling
& excluding Islam’s fifth column invaders from our borders.

elections

We select our leaders through the electoral process,
not by heredity or violence.  They must gain our confidence and
exhibit agreement with our concerns in order to be elected.  The
electorate is rapidly wising up to Islam, and a few courageous
candidates are beginning to speak the truth about Islam. That is a good
thing, a vital sign of life in Western Civilization.

Recent UN resolutions and OIC Islamophobia reports
have raised the issue of anti-Islamic campaign rhetoric. They can go to
Hell.  Our leaders and our policies are ours, not yours. We will
not submit to any demand that our candidates for office lift Satan’s
tail; and insert their tongues.

deep roots

Islamic conquest of Spain, Greece,Turkey, Albania,
etc. and invasions of Italy have not been entirely forgotten.
Where history is still taught accurately and effectively, the seeds of
recognition of approaching danger take root and sprout.

deep roots

Islam is not a race; it is an Arab mafia which has
enslaved people of all races.  The Race Card is used to demonize
and discredit critics; it is a form of the argumentum ad homimem
logical fallacy.

religious hatred

Islam is not a religion, it is a continuing criminal
enterprise disguised as a religion; Islam is a crime against humanity:
a war crime. There is nothing immoral or illegal about hating
Islam.  Any law that makes hatred and exposure of
approaching,  present or persistent enemy forces must be repealed
or result in rebellion.

Muslims forget that much of their cannon has been
translated and published to the web. We can read about “Love and Hate
for the Sake of Allah”.  We have read your curses which recur in
the Qur’an.

We are aware of your attitude & intentions.  We will continue
to expose them.  We will not be silenced.

divine religions

Divine religions can live in peace and harmony once
the demonic ‘religion”: Islam, is removed from the world.  Lest
any damned fool dream that Islam partakes of divinity, I remind you of
Surah Al-Anfal 67 linked above which exposes Allah’s blood lust for
genocide and provide a link to Islam’s creation myth
which confirms the fact that Islam is demonic.  Allah rubbed one
of Adam’s shoulders to produce people for the fire and the other to
produce people destined for Paradise.

March 7, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Islamophobia: UN Censorship Agenda 2012


Call it Islamophobia, defamation of Islam, defamation of religions,
vilification or negative stereotyping, it still implies and entails
criminalizing the questioning, criticism and exposure of the damnable
doctrines & practices of Islam.  The name and the rhetoric
change; the intention does not.  The OIC & UN seek to codify
the following into international & national law:

At the opening of the 19th session of the
Human Rights Council February 28, 2012, Ekmeleddin_Insanoglu, Secretary
General of the OIC, made revealing remarks which expose the true agenda
of Islam and the UN.  At the time of this writing, no new draft
resolutions on this subject have been uploaded to the HRC extranet, but
I presume that one will be shortly before March 20.  I have
excerpted the relevant paragraphs, adding links to two previous
resolutions mentioned in the speech.

Islamophobia
is a contemporary manifestation of racism. Combating Islamophobia as
well as

vilification of all religions and denigration of symbols and
personalities sacred to all religions

is a matter of priority at the OIC. We regret that events representing
constitutionalization and

institutionalization of Islamophobia continue to unfold. Most
disconcerting is Islamophobia

being used as an instrument of electoral politics. This is a dangerous
trend that needs to be

arrested. It threatens the multicultural fabric of societies. It could
seriously undermine

international community’s efforts aimed at interfaith harmony that
could underwrite peace

and security- particularly so in a world faced with the menace of
terrorism. There is an urgent

need to initiate and sustain ‘preventive cultural diplomacy.

It is in this context that OIC took the initiative embodied in the
resolution 16/1 8. This session

marks the first anniversary of the consensual passage of this
resolution. It was based on the

eight points that I mentioned during my address to the 15th session of
the Council in

September 201 0. I am glad that these points found resonance with all
the negotiating partners

and resulted in a process of consensus building. We must now build on
the consensus. It is

with this. in mind that I initiated – with the presence and
participation of US Secretary of

State Hillary Clinton, Baroness Ashton and other Ministers – the
Istanbul Process for a

consensual implementation of this resolution. The process seems to be
going forward with

the last meeting held in Washington and the next to be scheduled in the
EU region. OIC will

also be hosting an event this year to further the Process. We believe
it is important to have a

structured engagement. We must address the grey areas and the whole
package of interrelated

issues by accommodating all concerns of all parties. The alternative
approach in resolutions ‘

16/18
at HRC and 66/167 at UNGA has put the decade of polarization
and politicization

behind us. This enables us to address the real issues and chart out a
sustainable and result-oriented

course of action at the national and the international levels. Recent
events

characterized by loss of lives in Norway and Afghanistan underscored
the importance of

concerted and consensual international action. OIC has demonstrated
ability to build consensus

on the most sensitive of international issues. We look forward to being
reciprocated in the same spirit.

Islamophobia

Phobia implies irrationality.  There is nothing
irrational about fear & loathing of Islam because terrorism is an
intrinsic sacrament1
of Islam.

racism

What race is Islam? It originated in Arabia, but it
enslaved millions of Africans & Asians through conquest. Ideology
& religion are dynamic, but race is static and immutable.  We
do not hate Muslims because of their skin color, we hate their belief2 that they
have a divine
mission to convert or enslave
us through conquest.

Muslims use false accusations of racism to denigrate
& calumniate its critics because they can not refute the facts we
present.

vilification of all religions

In the Qur’an, Jews are those who “earned your anger” &
Christians are those who “went astray”
. We are described as the worst of living creatures”. They recite Surah Al-Fatiha
seventeen times each day, reminding Allah why he should burn us.

denigration of personalities

Truthfully describing Muhammad as a lecherous
pedophile who married a six year old girl, arranged
the divorce
of his daughter in law so he could add her to his
harem and ordered the murder of critics is denigration of a
sacred person but denial of Christ’s
paternity
, divinity, crucifixion,
death & resurrection
and depicting him as a  warlord who will return to lead the Muslims in the
final genocide 3 is perfectly
ok.

constitutionalization

It is nearly certain that this is a reference to the
anti-Shari’ah movement to pass legislation and constitutional
amendments to exclude foreign law, including Shari’ah from our court system.

instrument of electoral politics

That is an obvious reference to campaign
advertisements and ‘debate’ statements critical of Islam.  They
want to criminalize criticism of Islam by candidates for office.

interfaith harmony

Translation: submission to Islam.  The sentence
including that phrase is a thinly veiled threat of war.

polarization

The sentence containing that word is a reference to
the dispute over the ‘defamation of religions’ meme. The position of
Western Civilization is that defamation and legal protection from its
effects belong to individuals, not to religions. Our side views the
defamation meme as an existential threat to freedom of
expression.  Islam views freedom of expression as subordinate to
their sensitivities. Muslims are sensitive because they know that Islam
is an impious fraud but are so heavily invested in it that they can not
acknowledge the fact.

defamation

The claim that Res16/18 eliminated the defamation
meme and associated conflict is malignant malarkey.  There is no
significant difference between defamation and negative
stereotyping.  A/C.3/66/L.48/Rev.1, passed Dec. 19, ’12 along
with A/66/167, emphasizes that “that no religion should be
equated with
terrorism,
as this may have adverse consequences on the
enjoyment of
the right to freedom of religion or belief of all members of the
religious communities concerned;”.

At the opening of Session 19, Qatar’s Minister of State for Foreign Affairs had this
to say
:

The international community still
faces a major challenge


due to the worsening impact
of racist practices, racial


discrimination, acts of
violence and related conflicts. These


practices have become evident
in the

defamation
and negative

stereotyping
of religions
, as well
as in the incitement to violence


against people on the basis
of their religion or belief.

  1. 3:151, 7:4, 8:12, 8:57 8:60, 33:26, 59:2, 59:13, Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331,
    Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220,

  2. Islam is inseverable, all or nothing. 2:85
    strictly prohibits selectivity, making Islam a package deal.  Believers
    are only those who “fight in Allah’s cause”, which is to make Islam dominate the world.
  3. “In the future, the Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah);
    and the Muslims, along with
    `Isa, son of Mary, will kill the Jews
    . This will occur just
    before the end of this world.”

 

March 1, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

CAIR Denounces Santorum’s Call for Profiling


CAIR Denouces Santorum’s Call For Profiling

One of my Google Alerts was triggered by an article about a CAIR press
release demanding that the GOP denounce Rick Santorum’s debate answer
on profiling. Video of the debate segment is linked below, and embedded
where possible.  Play it twice, once to listen and once to watch
the facial expressions and gestures, particularly those of Rep. Paul
and Herman Cain.

The text of CAIR’s  press release and my
analysis follow the video. Thanks and a tip of the hat to Breitbart!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=va6PVE7QkUY


WASHINGTONNov. 23, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/
— The Council on American-Islamic Relations
(CAIR) today called on
the
Republican Party to
repudiate
GOP presidential hopeful Rick Santorum‘s
call for profiling of American Muslims.

In
a debate aired on CNN last night, Santorum was asked if he would
support ethnic and religious profiling. CNN’s Wolf Blitzer,
the debate’s moderator, asked Santorum: “So just to be precise, is it
ethnic profiling, religious profiling, who would be profiled
?”

“The
folks who are most
likely to be committing
these crimes,” replied
Santorum. “Obviously
Muslims
would be someone you’d look at,
absolutely.”

Video:
Rick Santorum Calls for Profiling of Muslims

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=va6PVE7QkUY

In
a statement released today, CAIR National Legislative Director Corey Saylor said:

“Last
night, Rick
Santorum
 casually
tossed aside every American’s constitutional right to
equal protection

under the law in favor of discriminatory profiling of Muslims. Mr.
Santorum’s obvious lack of appreciation for the
Constitution
and for
the rejection of
profiling by top law enforcement experts
raises
reasonable questions
about his ability to lead our multi-faith nation
.

“The
International
Association of Chiefs of Police and other security
specialists
reject racial profiling. President Bush called it
‘wrong.

In 2009, President Obama
pledged to end the counterproductive practice
.

“We
remind Mr. Santorum that the Prophet Jesus (peace be
upon him), a man of Middle Eastern heritage, would fit his ‘profile
.’

“It
is time for all Republican presidential candidates to reject
Islamophobic rhetoric. Just as past candidates have learned the folly
of targeting other religious or ethnic minorities, serious presidential
hopefuls must reject the use anti-Muslim smears
and the exploitation of
Islamophobia for cheap political gain.”

CAIR
also thanked another GOP presidential candidate, Representative Ron Paul of Texas, for
rejecting profiling and refusing to sacrifice the rule of law.

A
CAIR Legislative Fact Sheet states that profiling is
unconstitutional
,
hinders anti-terrorism efforts and “diverts precious law
enforcement
resource
s away from investigations of individuals who have been
linked
to terrorist activity by specific and credible evidence.”

SEE:
CAIR Legislative Fact Sheet on Profiling

http://tinyurl.com/7wf3v7y

Earlier
this year, Santorum called “Sharia,” or Islamic
principles, “evil.
” He told a group in New Hampshire:
“We need to define it and say what it is. And it is evil.” In a past
“lecture on Islam,” Santorum falsely claimed the Quran, Islam’s
revealed text, was written in “Islamic.”

SEE:
Santorum, GOP Continue Anti-Sharia Campaign

http://tinyurl.com/4ml97xd

Last
week, CAIR called on state and national GOP leaders to demand the
resignation of a Tennessee lawmaker
after he suggested in a radio interview that U.S. Muslims should “go
back to where they came from” if they objected to his recent call for
the removal of all Muslims serving in the military.

CAIR:
TN GOP Rep. Tells Muslims to ‘Go Back to Where They Came From’

http://bit.ly/uetuEF

A
number of recent reports have documented the disturbing growth and
promotion of Islamophobia in American society.

CAIR:
Same Hate, New Target

http://tinyurl.com/66enzm8

Center for American Progress: Fear, Inc.

http://tinyurl.com/7cozjxg

Southern Poverty Law Center: Jihad Against Islam

http://tinyurl.com/3qsv2v8

People for the American Way: The Right-Wing Playbook on Anti-Muslim
Extremism

http://tinyurl.com/6j9fttw

CAIR
is America’s largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization.
Its mission is to enhance the understanding of Islam, encourage
dialogue, protect civil liberties, empower American Muslims, and build
coalitions that promote justice and mutual understanding.

CONTACT:
CAIR National Legislative Director Corey
Saylor
, 202-384-8857, E-Mail: csaylor@cair.com;
CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim
Hooper
, 202-744-7726, or 202-488-8787, E-Mail: ihooper@cair.com;
CAIR Communications Coordinator Amina
Rubin
, 202-488-8787, 202-341-4171, E-Mail: arubin@cair.com

SOURCE
Council on American-Islamic Relations

 

called on GOP to repudiate

The days of the smoke filled room backstage at the
national convention are long gone.  The real nominating process
belongs to the party membership, not to the hierarchy.  Condemning
stands taken by candidates is not the role of the RNC or the state
central committees.

CAIR is engaging in intimidation tactics, trying to
cast terror into the hearts of nervous Nellie political consultants who
conceive of political correctness as holy writ.  The RNC, Santorum
and the rational candidates should denounce CAIR’s political terror
tactics and tell CAIR to sit down, shut up and mind their own business.

I swear that, if the Republican Party surrenders to
CAIR’s outrageous demand, lifting Allah’s tail and inserting their
tongues, I will not vote for any Republican candidate who does not
explicitly condemn Islam.

profiling of American Muslims

That  is a prime example of misdirection.
Attention of security personnel should be focused on Muslims, regardless of
nationality
.
While 9/11 was perpetrated by foreigners, many of the recent plots
involved American citizens.  When you hear hoof beats, do you look
for unicorns or horses?

just to be precise

Precise questioning is a good thing, particularly in
court rooms, but in this case, what appears
on the surface, to be  precision
is entrapment.  A genuine precision question would not include
“precise” in its rhetoric.  I have no doubt that Blitzer was
setting Santorum up for this.

ethnic || religious: who would be profiled

That question misdirects attention away from the
real issue.  Terrorism is an intrinsic function of Islam, not
primarily linked to nationality or race.  Most recent mass
casualty terror attacks have been perpetrated by Muslims.

Islam is neither a race nor a religion; it is a way
of life which dictates every facet of human life, spiritual &
temporal. Islam has inseverable & interdependent  religious,
economic and military components. All of those components involve jihad. Jihad is the preferred alternative to trade &
agriculture economies.

Little old Catholic ladies and Baptist babies do not
commit terror attacks, young Muslim men do. That should be a clue for
you.  Rep. Paul cites Timothy McVeigh, the exception which proves
the rule.  How many nitrate bombs have been planned or planted by
lapsed Catholics?  Compare that to the number of improvised
explosive devices planned or planted by Muslims.

Muslims come in all colors.  Eliminate
Islam and Islamic terrorism will be eliminated.  If you want
travel to be safe, exclude Muslims from mass transit facilities and
vehicles.  That would impede but not stop the Times Square
Bomber.  To stop the multitude of alternative attack methods and
venues, it is necessary to remove and exclude those persons most likely
to engage in terrorism: Muslims.

most likely to be committing: Muslims

Why would Santorum say that? Baptists,
Buddhists  & Hindus are not turning up in the news for
bombings every month, Muslims are. Why is that?  Who besides Moe
preached and exemplified terrorism to his disciples?  “Its Islam,
stupid!” Why did Khalid Sheik Mohammed and his excellent
companions attack
us?  Get a clue.

Cover page of confession.

First page of confession.

Obviously Muslims

It is obvious to Santorum why is it not obvious to
others?  Is it not common knowledge that Islamic terrorism is
perpetrated by Muslims?  Is it not common knowledge that terror
attacks are an act of worship?  Is it not common knowledge that
Allah commanded casting terror into the hearts of enemies?  Is it
not common knowledge that disbelievers are the enemies of
Muslims?  Those facts are objectively true, why are they not
common knowledge?  The answers are political correctness and
intimidation.

constitutional right to equal protection

Equal protection of the laws means no class
distinctions; nobody is punished or immunized based on his social or
economic status.  Equal protection  means that Baptists,
Catholics & atheists are all protected from Islamic terror attacks
by excluding terrorists from places where innocent people
congregate.

Applying extra scrutiny to those persons most likely
to engage in terror attacks does not deny equal protection of the laws.
It does not impair anyone’s constitutional rights. One bright Tuesday
in September, ’01, several thousand people had their right to life
denied by Muslims who hijacked aircraft.  Keeping those Muslims
off of those flights would not have impaired any rights.  Keeping
them out of this nation would not have impaired anyone’s rights.

appreciation for the Constitution

The Constitution provides protection for the right
to life and the right to free speech. It is CAIR, not Santorum who
lacks appreciation for those rights. CAIR demands censorship of all
criticism of Islam.  CAIR applies intimidation tactics to close
private venues to those who speak out against it.  CAIR seeks to
deny effective protection from terror attacks.  This is a prime
example of hypocrisy & projection.

law enforcement experts

Appeal to authority is a logical fallacy.
Terrorism is a military issue, not a law enforcement issue.  Had
all Muslims been excluded from all domestic flights as they should be,
the Accursed Abomination would have been impossible; 3000 people would
be alive and healthy.   Why has Israel not lost any aircraft
recently?  How did they stop hijackings and prevent flying
bombs?  If you want to stop air based terrorism, consult Israel’s
experts forst.

lead our multi-faith nation

How do the leadership requirements vary between
monocultural and multicultural nations?  What difference does it
make to the Presidency whether we have no, 1, 2 or any number of
religions?

The President can not lead Muslims. Muslims are
commanded not to place themselves in positions subordinate to kuffar.
Take a close look at Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:51 Surah At-Taubah 9:33.  Shari’ah declares
non-Arabs to be unsuitable marriage partners for Muslimas “because “Allah has chosen the Arabs above others“.
Get a clue.

security specialists reject racial profiling

Is Islam a race? Allah has enslaved people of all
races, so what race is Islam?  Did race play a role in the acts of
the “shoe bomber” & “underwear bomber”? They are different racially
but both are Muslim. Get a clue.

wrong

What Shrub said is not relevant; he is out of office
and ineligible to run again. Being a fool who said “Islam is a great religion of peace“,
he has no probative authority.  Exactly what is wrong with
scrutinizing Muslims in the airport lines?  Exactly what is wrong
with determining the religious affiliation of persons with Arab &
Asiatic appearance in airport lines?

counterproductive practice

Four of our aircraft were hijacked and deliberately
crashed in ’01; how many Israeli aircraft were hijacked in that
year?  Exactly what is counter productive about profiling?
If a white man robs a bank do you draw black men into a dragnet?
Get a clue.

Prophet Jesus … would fit his ‘profile

The AssWholliness
of that blasphemy is outrageous!  Jesus Christ is not a prophet of
Islam. Which of his teachings do Muslims teach in the mosques and
practice? Jesus Christ did not reveal the obligation of offensive
conquest. Jesus Christ did not reveal the need to exterminate Jews.  Jesus Christ
neither sanctified nor exemplified terrorism.  Jesus Christ is not a genocidal warlord.

Jesus was born to a descendant of King David; His
heritage is Jewish, not Arab. Jesus Christ taught Judaism in the Jewish
Temple, not Islam in a mosque. The place of his birth is Israel, not
Falestine.

reject Islamophobic rhetoric

There is nothing phobic about loathing of Islam
which is well founded in objective factual reality. Islam is perpetual war.  Muslims, motivated
by Allah’s threat & promise,
perpetrated the Hindu, Armenian & Assyrian genocides. Those who
perpetrated recent atrocities in New York, London & Beslan
shouted  “Allahu Akbar”, not “Jesus is Lord”. Get a clue.

I swear that I will not vote for any candidate who
lifts Allah’s tail and inserts his tongue by accepting CAIR’s
outrageous demand.

profiling is unconstitutional

Prove it. Show us the constitutional provision which
explicitly forbids it.

diverts precious law enforcement resources

Resources are wasted by searching, scanning and
harassing kuffar children and their grandmothers. Resources are wasted
by random searches. Resources are wasted by not excluding Muslims from
mass transit so that the whole TSA program could be scrapped.

linked to terrorist activity

I will
cast terror
.”.  “Allah
cast terror…
“. “…That is because they suffer neither thirst nor
fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any step to raise
the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy
but
is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness….”. “I have been made victorious with terror“.
“…Then do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest?
Then what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except
disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they
shall be consigned to the most grievous torment….” Islam is terrorist
activity; Muslims are linked to it by Allah’s yoke of slavery.

Santorum called “Sharia,” or Islamic principles, “evil”

Santorum spoke the truth. Examine the evidence;
see for yourself.  Shari’ah imposes cruel & unusual
punishment. Shari’ah mandates annual military attacks against
disbelievers. Shari’ah declares that the caliph makes war upon Jews,
Christians and Zoroastrians. Shari’ah denies religious freedom,
equality and dignity.

November 24, 2011 Posted by | CAIR, GWB, GWOT, Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Political Correctness, Politics | , , , | 1 Comment

%d bloggers like this: