Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Incidents Of Intolerance

A/C.3/68/L.48 Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons, based on religion or belief continues with another expresion of deep concern after welcoming previous resolutions.

Deeply concerned about incidents of intolerance, discrimination and violence
against persons based on their religion or belief in all regions of the world,

Deploring any advocacy of discrimination or violence on the basis of religion
or belief,

Strongly deploring all acts of violence against persons on the basis of their
religion or belief, as well as any such acts directed against their homes, businesses,
properties, schools, cultural centres or places of worship,
Strongly deploring, further, all attacks on and in religious places, sites and
shrines in violation of international law, in particular human rights law and
international humanitarian law, including any deliberate destruction of relics and

Concerned about actions that wilfully exploit tensions or target individuals on
the basis of their religion or belief,

Expressing deep concern at the instances of intolerance, discrimination and
acts of violence occurring in the world, including cases motivated by discrimination
against persons belonging to religious minorities, in addition to the negative
projection of the followers of religions and the enforcement of measures that
specifically discriminate against persons on the basis of religion or belief,

Expressing concern at the growing manifestations of intolerance based on
religion or belief that can generate hatred and violence among individuals from and
within different nations, which may have serious implications at the national,
regional and international levels, and in this regard emphasizing the importance of
respect for religious and cultural diversity, as well as interfaith and intercultural
dialogue aimed at promoting a culture of tolerance and respect among individuals,
societies and nations,

If they really cared about the Christians being shot, blown up, burned to death inside their churches and otherwise terrorized in Pakistan, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria and Egypt with governments turning a blind eye if not actively supporting the mayhem, perhaps they would send in peace keeping forces to protect the innocent victims instead of sitting around deploring the violence and wringing their hands.

But they do not give a damn about that. Instead they are concerned that Pastor Terry Jones might burn a few thousand Qur’ans. They are concerned about Representative Bachman’s letter to an Inspector General inquiring as to why Muslim Brotherhood infiltrators are not properly vetted.

What are “incidents of intollerance”?  What is so deplorable about discrimination?  Shouldn’t we try to expel and exclude the enemy fifth colomun from our midst?

What are “insatances of intolerance”?  Would CAIR’s demands to shut down speeches by Usama Dakdok and Pamela Geller qualify as “instances of inteolerance”, or is it their freedom of expression the UN is bitching about?

Concerned about intolerance?  Oh, really?  Islamic law states that because we are not Muslims, we must be killed. Does the United Nations have a God blessed clue for Chrissake?

Concerned about violence?  Do the United Nations have a God blessed clue about the Islamic law that requires Muslimsto engage in offensive warfare at least once in every year?  Do they give a damn about Islam’s promise of reward for acts of terrorism?

Sadly, their only concern is finding ways to shut us up: to squelch our exposure of the evil which masquerades as the “religion of peace”.

November 9, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Jihad, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , | 2 Comments

The need for renewed attention to the Islamophobia phenomenon

The need for renewed attention to the Islamophobia


Written statement* submitted by the Organization for

Defending Victims of Violence, a non-governmental

organization in special consultative status

The need for renewed attention to the Islamophobia phenomenon

    Twelve years ago, more than 3,000 innocent people

were victimized by violent terrorists. Our government failed to protect

them.  Those who died in the abominable attacks can not be

defended. Those maimed and terrorized can only be defended by

eliminating the the ideology which motivated the attackers.

    This is a case of self-described defenders of

victims defending the attacker instead of the victims. It is an

inversion of morality and denial of objective factual reality.  I

am making an H1 heading out of each pertinent point in the first

paragraph, and revealing the truth with evidence from Islam’s canonical

texts including the Qur’an, hadith and Islamic law. [All emphasis added

for clarity.]

“Islamophobia can be described a enmity

and hatred towards them or illogical fear from

Muslims. This definition includes discrimination against Muslims in the

form of rejecting

them from political, economic, social and public life, believing in the

subjugation of Islam

and Muslims towards the West and the assumption of Islam being a

political and violent

ideology and not a religion.”

enmity & hatred


And from those who call themselves Christians, We took their covenant,

but they have abandoned a good part of the Message that was sent to

them. So We planted amongst them enmity and hatred

till the Day of Resurrection (when they discarded Allâh’s Book,

disobeyed Allâh’s Messengers and His Orders and transgressed beyond

bounds in Allâh’s disobedience), and Allâh will inform them of what

they used to do.  

illogical fear

    Terrorism is infliction of fear.  What is

illogical about that reaction to vicious attacks and continued



    Is it possible for a rational and informed person to

avoid rejecting Islam and its adherents?  How can a rational and

informed person fail to demand the expulsion and exclusion of potential

terrorists from our soil? 


    Follow this

link to Surah At-Taubah 9:29 and and read each of the thirty odd

parallel translations.  Do

expressions such as  “brought low”, “humbled”,”state of

subjection” mean anything to you? 

    Follow this link to The Reliance of the Traveller,  Book O11.5

and read about the social restrictions imposed upon conquered

Christians by Shari’ah. We are not allowed to ring church bells,

display crosses, hold public processions, pray aloud in public or build

new churches.


    Islam does not separate the temporal and spiritual

realms, it conflates them. Mosque and state are one entity. Muhammad

ran both as autocratic dictator. Islam must replace all unislamic

governments as unjust and tyrannical. Muslims are obligated to

conquer and convert the entire world.

13:41. See they not that We gradually reduce the land (of

disbelievers, by giving it to the believers,

in war victories) from its outlying borders. And Allâh judges, there is

none to put back His Judgement and He is Swift at reckoning.

14:15. But they (the Messengers) sought victory

and help [from their Lord (Allâh)], and every obstinate, arrogant dictator

(who refuses to believe in the Oneness of Allâh) was brought to a complete loss and


“Islam wishes to destroy all

states and governments

anywhere on

the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and

programme of

Islam regardless of the country or the Nation which rules it. The

purpose of Islam is to set up a state on the basis of its own ideology


programme, regardless of which nation assumes the role of the

standard-bearer of

Islam or the rule of which nation is undermined in the process of the

establishment of an ideological Islamic State. Islam requires the

earth—not just a

portion, but the whole planet—not because the sovereignty over the

earth should

be wrested from one nation or several nations and vested in one

particular nation,

but because the entire mankind should benefit from the ideology and

welfare programme or what would be truer to say from ‘Islam’ which is


programme of well-being for all humanity.” [Jihad in Islam–Maududi pg. 10]


the Muslim community, the holy war is a

religious duty, because of the

universalism of the (Muslim) mission and (the obligation

to) convert

everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force. Therefore,

caliphate and royal authority are united in (Islam), so that the person

in charge can devote the available strength to both of them 408at the same time.” [Ibn Khaldun–Muquaddimah Ch. 3.]


    Allah said something about violence: he issued

commands to engage in it, threatening Muslims who shirk with Hell fire and promising those who fight admission

to his celestial bordello

2:216. Jihâd (holy

fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is ordained for you

(Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing

which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you.

Allâh knows but you do not know.


And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism:

i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will

all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease

(worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer

of what they do.  

8:59. And let not those

who disbelieve think that they can outstrip (escape from the

punishment). Verily, they will

never be able to save themselves (from Allâh’s Punishment).

8:60. And make ready

against them all you can of power, including steeds of war

(tanks, planes, missiles, artillery, etc.) to threaten the

enemy of Allâh and your enemy, and others besides whom, you may not

know but whom Allâh does know. And whatever you shall spend in

the Cause of Allâh shall be repaid unto you, and you shall not be

treated unjustly.

9:29. Fight against

those who

(1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that

which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who

acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people

of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay

the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with

you, that when

you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you

cling heavily to the earth?

Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter?

But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with

the Hereafter.

9:39. If you march not

forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will

replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and

Allâh is Able to do all things.


Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their

properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in

Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed.

It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah)

and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his

covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have

concluded. That is the supreme success .

9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of

the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find

harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the

Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).

61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that

will save you from a painful torment.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ),

and that

you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and

your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If

you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens

under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of

‘Adn ­ Eternity [‘Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great


    The founder of Islam, damnation be upon him,

confirmed the obvious and let us know what he thinks of us. Our blood

and property are not sacred to Muslims, its open season and we have no

human rights.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered

to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped

but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla

and slaughter as we slaughter,

then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will

not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with

Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik,

“O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He

replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but

Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our

slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and

obligations as other Muslims have.”

    Islamic law codifies those damnable imperatives. The

Shafi’i school’s  “The Reliance of The Traveller”, Book I, Chapter

9 codifies the law of Jihad.

O9.0 defines Jihad as “war against non-Muslims”,

deprecating Jihad an-Nafs, which CAIR and other liars swear by.  O9.1

discusses the communal obligation to attack passive infidels in every

year, declaring all who know of the obligation to be in sin if it is

not performed when possible.  O9.8 

declares that “The caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians and

Zoroastrians until…”, citing 9:29 as its scriptural basis.  The

next section declares that “The caliph fights all other peoples until

they become Muslim.”.  O25.9, item 8 declares it a duty of subordinate

rulers bordering on infidel lands to wage war and distribute the


    The Hanifi school’s Hedaya, Volume II, pg. 140,

declares that “War must be carried out by some party of the Muslims at

all times.” and “Destruction of the sword is incurred by Infidels

although they be not the first aggressors. “. 

not a religion

    The “original religion” of Islam is Jihad: waging

war against the rest of the world. Jihad is preferred as a way of life

over trade, commerce and agriculture. If Muslims abandon Jihad, Allah

will curse them. 

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number


Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction,

hold the tails of oxen, are

pleased with agriculture, and give up

conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over

you, and will not withdraw it until you

return to your original religion.

    Obtain a clue, for Chrissake!!! The mission of Islam

is mercenary, not spiritual.  All we need to prove that fatal fact

is a few ayat & ahadith.  How many camels can a stone idol

ride and eat? How much money can it spend?  Who gets the

spoils?  What is Allah’s prime motivating factor? What was Moe’s

prime motivator?  Those are clues for all whose brains are not

between their buttocks.

8:1. They ask you (O Muhammad ) about the spoils of war.

Say: “The

spoils are for Allâh and the Messenger.”

So fear Allâh and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey

Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), if you are believers.

8:41. And know that whatever of

war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned

to Allâh, and to the Messenger,

and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad )], (and also)

the orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have

believed in Allâh and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad

) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the

two forces met (the battle of Badr) – And Allâh is Able to do all


8:67. It is not for a Prophet

that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with

ransom) until he had made a

great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the

good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the

captives), but

Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty,


    Moe wanted ransom money, Allah wants genocide. Got a

clue yet?   Allah saw Moe’s weakness & humility and made

spoils lawful for him.  Yeah, right.  Allah, what a great

idol: he gave Moe the keys to the treasures of the world, enriched him

through conquests and made him victorious with terror!

Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4327:

The spoils of war were not made

lawful for any people before us, This is because Allah saw our weakness and humility

and made them lawful for us.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 37, Number 495:

    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Whenever a dead man in debt was brought to Allah’s

Apostle he would ask, “Has he left anything to repay his debt?” If he

was informed that he had left something to repay his debts, he would

offer his funeral prayer, otherwise he would tell the Muslims to offer

their friend’s funeral prayer. When Allah made the Prophet wealthy

through conquests, he said, “I am more rightful than

other believers to be the guardian of the believers, so if a Muslim

dies while in debt, I am responsible for the repayment of his debt, and

whoever leaves wealth (after his death) it will belong to his heirs. “

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:

Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:

The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given

to any one else before me.

1. Allah

made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a

distance of one month’s journey.

2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for

praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my

followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.

3. The booty has been made Halal

(lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.

4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of


5. Every Prophet used to be sent to

his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:

 Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the

shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made

victorious with terror (cast

in the hearts of the enemy), and while

I was sleeping, the keys of the

treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.“

Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you,

people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not

benefit by them).

    I am selecting the most important paragraphs for

criticism. use the title link to read the entire report in


“For example according to a poll in

2010, only 37 percent of Americans had positive views

of Islam,1 and according to another poll in the same year

around one third of American

voters believed that Muslims should not be allowed to run for president.2

This trend is on

the rise in America, to an extent that in 2011 Americans’ positive

views towards Islam has

dropped to 30 percent.3

    More than one third of Amrericans suffer from

analencephalopathy, which is why Obama was elected our first Muslim

Traitor.  Public opinion is trending against Islam because more

people are becoming informed, learning about the damnable doctrines and

practices of the war cult.

“The ODVV believes that if

international human rights bodies had timely intervened and taken

proper measures against religious extremism, the roots of most of these

problems would

have been dried both in the Middle East and the West. The United

Nations failure in timely

and genuine concentration on the subject of dialogue among

civilizations and religions, and

also failure in serious confrontation with any form of insulting

individuals religions, and

failing to clarify the boundaries between freedom of expression and

defamation have all

resulted in most of these dormant processes to rejuvenate again.”


    Terrorizing and subjugating minorities is not

extremism; it is standard operating procedure in Islam.  If the

Security Council had wanted to suppress terrorism including hijacking

and fraggings, the Soviet Union would have vetoed any such move because

the PLO was their client and cat’s paw. Suppressing terrorism requires

eliminating Islam entirely. Nobody in power is willing to propose that,

much less to take effective action.

    Believers have sold their souls to Satan for

admission to his celestial bordello. They fight in his cause: world

domination, killing and being killed.  Allah promises admission to

his bordello for participation in Jihad. He promises extra credit

toward an upgrade for any act to injure or enrage disbelievers.

He threatens shirkers with eternal damnation.  Terrorists are

believers, trying to earn brownie points, not extremists. While there

are believers there will bn genocidal conquest and terrorism.


    There is nothing to say to Islam except “Go to

Hell!”.  Anything else is submission, and we who love life &

liberty will not submit. There is no common ground between us and those

who have sworn enmity and eternal warfare.

insulting Islam

    In Islamic law, slander is “anything the hearer

might not like”. Truth is not a defense. Any negative expression about

Islam, Allah or Moe gets a dhimmi killed. I disrespectfully direct

doubters, deniers & dissenters to The Reliance of The

Traveller:  R2.2, O8.01, O8.7O11.10.and O9.14.

freedom of expression & defamation

    Bitching bitterly about insulting or defaming Islam

is part of the campaign to outlaw all criticism of the war cult so that

we will not be able to name and shame the enemy.  Describing the

damnable doctrines and practices of Islam as I have done in this blog

post, with reference to its canon of scripture, tradition and

jurisprudence, would be punishable by death under Shari’ah.  We

who are aware and alert are not willing to submit to that.  We

have a First Amendment right to share our knowledge and our resolve

with our fellow citizens. We will not yield that right!

    By exploiting “Islamophobia”, Muslims hope to erect

a legal shield to prevent all questioning and criticism of their war

cult. The character, sayings and actions of the cult’s founder

discredit it, so we must be prevented from uttering & publishing

the fact that Moe married a six year old girl and consummated the

marriage when she was nine years old.  We must be prevented from

revealing his having sex with prisoners of war. We can’t mention the

fact that he suborned murder and assassination.  Allah forfend our

mentioning his racism. 

    A good offense is the best offense. 

Disrespectfully demand that Islam be defrocked, stripped of  first

amendment protection and expelled from America. 

September 15, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Big Lie: “UN drops call to outlaw ‘defamation of religions’

There is a sucker born every minute, because if we did not suck, we would not survive. Unfortunately, there is a surplus of adult bottom feeders who will cheerfully take and run with any bait.  A Google search for UN + “Defamation of Religions” turned up several news articles in addition to those in yesterday’s alert.

  • The US Is Not Opening The Door To Limiting Freedom of Speech

    Human Rights First – ‎5 hours ago‎
    Human Rights First has worked for years to reverse the tide of defamation of religions at the UN , and has welcomed HRC resolution 16/18 as well as this most recent General Assembly resolution. We believe it is important for governments to now
  • Turkey and America

    The Cutting Edge – ‎Dec 18, 2011‎
    [will] help in enacting domestic laws for the countries involved in the issue, as well as formulating international laws preventing inciting hatred resulting from the continued defamation of religions.” It unfairly held up the American experience for 
  • Free speech is in the cross hairs

    Prospectus – ‎Dec 18, 2011‎
    Although the latest resolution refers to “incitement” rather than “defamation” of religion (which appeared in the 2005 resolution), it continues the disingenuous effort to justify crackdowns on religious critics in the name of human rights law. 
  • Speak Not of Evil

    Canada Free Press – ‎Dec 19, 2011‎
    The Obama administration started down this ill-advised road by cosponsoring in 2009 an OIC-drafted resolution in the UNHuman Rights Council that condemned “defamation of religion” – read, Islam. That initiative helped advance the Islamists’ 


UN drops call to outlaw ‘defamation of religions
AP The call on countries to prohibit “defamation” had been included in a decisive break from the polarizing focus in the past on defamation of religions.”
UN General Assembly Abandons Dangerous “Defamation of Religion
Human Rights First
“Today’s unanimous vote marks a decisive break from the polarizing focus in the past on defamation of religions.” said Human Rights First’s Tad Stahnke.
UN condemns religious intolerance, drops ‘defamation
Reuters Africa
religious intolerance without urging states to outlaw “defamation of religions,” an appeal critics said opened the door to abusive “blasphemy” laws.
UN condemns religious intolerance, drops ‘defamation
Reuters India
L had won majority approval in UN rights bodies in Geneva and at the UN General Assembly for annual resolutions on “combating defamation of religions.


Blogs 1 new result for “Defamation of Religions”
UN condemns religious intolerance, drops ‘defamation’ line for first
By Louis Charbonneau
For the first time in more than a decade, the U.N. General Assembly on Monday condemned religious intolerance without urging states to outlaw defamation of religions, an appeal critics said opened the door to abusive blasphemy laws.


Web 3 new results for “Defamation of Religions”
UN drops call to outlaw ‘defamation of religions‘ – Beverly Hills
Teen BHEF met Tuesday to approve their revised by-laws and present awards of appreciation to Sandy West of The Beverly Hilton and Corrine Verdery of Oasis…/83854
UN drops call to outlaw ‘defamation of religions‘ – TODAY News
The U.N. General Assembly on Monday condemned religious intolerance without urging states to outlaw “defamation of religions.”
UN drops call to outlaw ‘defamation of religions‘ – Newsvine
‘Governments should now focus on concrete measures to fight religiously motivated violence … while recognizing the importance of freedom of expression,’…/9561504-un-drops-call-to…

Only two out of twelve articles reflect objective factual reality, the rest swallow the bait.  That is not a good sign.  Lets sneak around the gate of the defamation meme and examine the core issue. Words have meanings, but Muslims assign their own meanings to common words.We must not assume that those words mean what they say when spoken by Muslims.

The opening of the 15th session of the Human Rights Council was marked by an address from Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, Secretary General of the OIC.

The new session of the Council is also coincides with  with regrettable events that are
deliberately meant to defame religions as well incite hatred, xenophobia, discrimination and
violence against religions, in particular Islam. The increasing incidents of violence and
discrimination on the basis of religion must not be ignored. We hope that this and other
related  issues remain an important priority in the work of the Council.

The most recent and unfortunate in the series of such events was the announcement
pertaining to Bum a Koran Day. It was highly provocative towards the religious sentiments
of Muslims everywhere in the world and must be condemned in the strongest possible terms.
On August 24,2010 I issued a cautionary statement on the plan to burn the Holy Qur’an and
urged the American people as a whole as well as the world community to reject the call of the
Gainesville Church pastor[….]

In this regard all xenophobic campaigns of fear mongering and discriminatory
measures – both in policy and practice – which restrict, prohibit or discriminate against of any
religion such as ban on the constriction of minarets, organization of events that incite hatred
like Burn a Koran Day, and other discriminatory measures must be strongly condemned by
the international community. A recurrence of such events substantiate OIC’s call for a
normative approach to deal with this menace that continues to pose a clear ‘and present danger
to peace, security ‘and stability in the regional as well as the global context. Such acts fuel
discrimination, extremism and mis-perception leading to polarization and fragmentation with
dangerous unintendecl ancl unforeseen consequences.[…]

[…]such events which endanger peaceful coexistence
between nations and create an environment conducive to violence

The first three sentences quoted above are loaded with meaning which must be dissected and examined.

regrettable events

In this case, one event: International Burn The Qur’an Day, which was scheduled for 09/11/10 to commemorate  the accursed abomination by highlighting the Qur’an verses which inspired it.  The event was called off under intense government pressure.

deliberately meant to

How does anyone know the intention of the event unless it is clearly stated? The stated purpose of the event was to foster awareness of Islamic doctrines and their real world consequences. But Ihsanoglu assigns other intentions which he projects onto the event from afar.

defame religions

Defamation is false and malicious.  What is false about connecting the dots; Allah’s sanctification of terror, his casting terror resulting in death, captivity & dispossession, Moe’s bragging about terror making him victorious and the abominable act motivated by Allah’s imperative, threat and promise?


Pastor Jones was not inciting anyone to do anything more than incinerate the book which inspired the “Magnificent 19”. Nothing was to be said, implied or illustrate to incite anyone to assault Muslims. He issued no war cry or call to arms and implied none.


It is only natural for a nation under attack and threat of attack to hate its attackers and the damnable doctrines which motivate them and inspire them to attempt genocide & politicide.  No incitement is needed to make intelligent and informed Americans hate Islam.


People naturally make choices. If we choose to avoid association with and proximity to persons made inimical to us by their ideology, that is discrimination, but it is not evil.

Hating a man for his skin pigment is evil. Hating a man because he adheres to an ideology which enjoins him to kill or enslave you is not evil, it is common sense.  Warning people about that ideology and its consequences is not inciting hatred.  Hatred is incited by the ideology and the acts it inspires.


When Pastor Jones tried and burned a Qur’an in March of 2011, rioting broke out in Pakistan.  The riots were not incited by anything in Gainesville, they were incited by what was preached in the mosques at Jumah Salat.  The politicians and media dare not make the connection between the riots and the end of Friday afternoon sermons.  Instead, they prefer to blame an unrelated event separated by thousands of miles and several days.

events that incite hatred

Beirut Embassy bombing

USS Cole bombing



Beslan Massacre

Mumbai Massacre

London subway bombing

Madrid rail bombing

endanger peaceful coexistence

Trying and burning a Qur’an did not start a war; what did?  have you forgotten? When such a threat is issued, why do we lift Satan’s tail and pucker up?

Defamation, while prominently cited, is not the issue. Examine this transcript of remarks by Pakistan’s Ambassador at the 16th session of the HRC.

Pakistan (on behalf of
the OIC)
Mr. Zamir Akram

Thank you Mr. President. On behalf of the OIC countries, I have the
honor to introduce the draft resolution entitled “combating
intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of and
discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons
based on religion or belief contained in document L.38.

Mr. President: this resolution addresses a number of
issues over which the OIC has been expressing concern over the years.
having said  that, I wish to state categorically that this
resolution does not replace earlier resolutions on combating
defamation.  which were adopted by the Human Rights Council  and
remain valid.  This resolution L.38  is an attempt on the
part of the oic to build consensus on an issue of vital importance
not only to Muslims but to people of all religions  and beliefs by
identifying  ways and means to deal with the growing problems of
religious incitement and discrimination and incitement to hatred and violence based on
religion or belief.

At the heart of this resolution are a series of practical steps
which need to be taken by states in order to address
this problem. This resolution addresses the core issues in a manner
that is acceptable to all including in  a legal sense, thus
seeking to bring all stake holders on board.  The OIC has gone
the extra mile to maintain a spirit of constructive engagement with all
partners during this process of consultation.

Our primary objective is to ensure that this text,
which will hopefully be adopted by consensus, will bind us all to the
commitments contained therein and oblige us all to ensure compliance
with its decisions.

Mr. President: Muslims around the world continue to be confronted
with ever increasing instances of intolerance, negative stereotyping,
stigmatization, discrimination  and violence on the basis of their religion; Islam.
Objective academic studies reveal that following the end of the cold war, the
pernicious doctrine of a clash of civilizations signaled the start of a narrative that required
the construction of a new enemy  to replace the global threat of
Communism with the so-called menace of Islam.

The reprehensible acts of terrorism on September 11,
2001 provided the trigger to unleash the clash of civilizations to the
forefront of global politics.  In the general Western view, no
distinction was made between a handful of extremists and terrorists  and
the overwhelming majority of peaceful and law abiding Muslims
living around the world. To make matters worse, against the backdrop of
the recent global economic crisis, these fears of Islam and Muslims are
now being manipulated by irresponsible and bigoted Western politicians
to gain political mileage  in their countries, unfortunately, with
remarkable success.

Terms such as Islamofascists have become common.
Even the Qur’an has not been spared;  it has been compared to Hitler’s
Mein Kampf. More recently, it was tried for religious crimes and
burnt.  Minarets at mosques deliberately depicted on posters
as missiles, have been banned. There have even been restrictions on
shops selling halal food, while no such restrictions exist on kosher
food outlets which are similar.

There is also increasing discrimination against Muslims in various
parts of the world.  They are being subjected to racial profiling
which confronts them with intractable problems at every border where
they are checked and re-checked.  Their businesses are repeatedly
scrutinized and their places of worship disallowed or desecrated.
They are made to feel unwelcome in societies where they live as

One prominent politician has recently organized
hearings that seek to put on trial the entire Muslim community and are
obviously designed to stoke fears against Muslims in that

Mr. President, the efforts by the oic to defend
our religion, our holy book and our prophet  and our people have
often been misrepresented as being contrary to international human
rights principles and laws, and in particular, rejected as undermining
the freedom of expression or opinion. The reality is different.
It is therefore appropriate in such a position, for us to try and
explain our faith and our principles. I hope, Mr. President, you will
give me a bit of extra time to do so.

Mr.  President: the Qur’an lays great emphasis on the
need for religious tolerance  as well as freedom of thought and
opinion.  In chapter 2, verse 256, the Qur’an states there is no
compulsion in religion.  In chapter 18, verse 29, the Qur’an
maintains that truth is from your Lord, so let him who please believe
and him who please disbelieve.  As regards freedom of
thought and opinion in Islam, the Qur’an states, in chapter 16, in verse 125 invite
all to the way of your creator with wisdom and arguments that are the
best and most gracious.  The Qur’an and the traditions of the holy
prophet also lay emphasis on the treatment of non-Muslims.
According to Prophet Muhammad, (PBUH), he who hurts a non-Muslim
citizen of a Muslim state I am his adversary and I shall be his
adversary on the day of  judgment.

Mr. President: it is also instructive for us to know
that we Muslims are not only bound by temporal laws to respect human
rights but by divine enjunctions contained in the Qur’an.  The
basic human rights as ordained in the Qur’an  include the
rights to life,  individual freedom, justice, equality, privacy, association
and basic necessities of life or minimum standard of living. These
obligations also include respect for women,  equality among human
beings, freedom of expression, protection from arbitrary imprisonment
and the right to oppose tyranny and injustice.  the last sermon of
the prophet (PBUH) is, in itself, a comprehensive charter of human
rights.  Islam has even established a complete code for the right
of combatants in war. Measures for the protection of all combatants as
well as homes and property belonging to them.

Mr. President: I have dwelt at length on these characteristics of Islam
because I want to underscore the common principles that underlie our
faith and the requirements of international law including international
human rights and humanitarian law.  Indeed, given the tremendous
contributions by Islam in various fields of human activity over
the  years, these principles have contributed to the evolution of
the very principles that we are trying to uphold today.

Mr. President, we sincerely believe that that irrespective of our
different cultural backgrounds and traditions, there is a shared
interest for all of us to show respect for each other’s religions and
beliefs  as well as to prevent any advocacy of religious hatred and
intolerance, discrimination and incitement  on the basis of religion or

The resolution under consideration seeks to achieve
these laudable objectives through a range of actions by states
including administrative steps, measures to criminalize imminent
violence, training and awareness programs, promotion of dialogue and
understanding at all levels.   The resolution also calls for
a global dialogue for the promotion of a culture of tolerance and peace
and in this context it decides to convene a panel discussion in the
Human Rights Council.  We hope that this resolution will be
adopted by consensus.  Before concluding, Mr. President, I would
like to place on record my appreciation for the support and cooperation
of all my colleagues in the oic  and in particular, members of
the core group of ambassadors that we set up to work out this
resolution.  I have truly benefited from the wisdom and advice and
without their support this text would not have been possible.  I
would also like to thank the Secretary General of the oic whose
support and guidance made this resolution possible.  In addition I
would like to express my appreciation — my sincere appreciation to all
our partners in the various groups, especially the ambassadors of the
U.S. and the U.K. on behalf of the European Union for their cooperative
and constructive approach.  Let me also thank the ambassadors from
the African group, grulac and Croatia for their cooperation and
engagement in this effort. I am glad that this oic initiative has
met with broad cross regional support which will send out a strong
message of unity from this council. Finally I would  like to thank
the experts from Pakistan, the U.S., the U.K. and other countries for
their tireless efforts to work out the text of this resolution. I thank
you Mr. president.

Akram’s screed contains numerous lies, which have been dissected in another blog post.

number of issues

To see what Akram was talking about, read the Islamophobia Report for April ’11.  The three principal exemplars are the Motoons, Fitna and the above mentioned Qur’an burning.


The ostensible objection to depicting Moe is idolatry. There are two problems with that. First, Moe ain’t supposed to be the deity, Allah is. Second, nobody would possibly make those cartoons an object of idolatry.  The real reason for objecting to their publication is their depicting Moe as a terrorist.

Moe could not have possessed a bomb because he died prior to the invention of gunpowder.  Moe cast terror by a series of barbarian attacks, deliberately building a reputation for barbarian repine, so that he was more feared than Allah.  Moe bragged about being made victorious by awe & terror. What more do you need to know to make a judgment?


The 15 minute documentary juxtaposes Qur’an verses and ahadith with the rabid rants of Imams at Jumah Salat and resulting acts of terror and rioting. Fitna does not incite violence, it exposes incitement. Fitna: Supporting Documentation 03/27/08  documents the ayat quoted in the documentary. Though words have meanings, we must be aware of the meanings intended by Muslims.  HRC 16/18 & Draft resolution XVII appear to concentrate on incitement.

Condemns any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to
discrimination, hostility or violence, whether it involves the use of print, audiovisual
or electronic media or any other means;
(e) Speaking out against intolerance, including advocacy of religious hatred
that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence;
(0 Adopting measures to criminalize the incitement to imminent violence
based on religion or belief;



What is it? Am I inciting hatred and violence by exposing the damnable doctrines of Islam which inculcate hatred and incite violence?  There is only one way to know the meaning: we must examine recent exemplary statements. This one, by Secretary Ban Ki-moon is dispositive.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

According to the Secretary General, Fitna constitutes hate speech & incitement not protected by freedom of expression.  From that statement, it is clear tha the intention of HRC 16/18 and Draft resolution XVII is to criminalize all criticism of Islam.

negative stereotyping

What is the difference between stereotyping and defamation?  Because Moe was a terrorist, who commanded Muslims to emulate himself, and because Allah commanded terrorism, Muslims are commanded to obey Allah and because selectivity is prohibited, all Muslims are potential terrorists.  To the extent that they are believers in Allah, his promise and his threat, they will eventually participate in an attack.  If it were not true, this paragraph would be defamatory. Even though it is true, it is negative and it is stereotyping, condemned by the resolutions.  In any case,


Islam is terrorism!  Allah sanctified it & engaged in it. Moe bragged about being made victorious by it.  To those bigots who who deny the obvious facts previously documented by reference to the Qur’an & hadth, this is defamatory. Previous resolutions condemned associating Islam with terrorism. These resolutions omit that meme, so, has the UN abandoned the defamation meme?  HELL NO!!!  And I will prove it.  Draft resolution XVII ain’t the only resolution passed by acclamation Dec. 19. I know something you don’t know but are about to find out.

Also emphasizes that no religion should be equated with terrorism, as this
may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom of religion
or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned;

¶10, on page 3 of Draft resolution XVIII,  emphasizes that Islam must not be equated with terrorism, which it is by the testimony of its own deity & founder previously cited.  Equation with terrorism fits the defamation meme, and it has not been dropped or abandoned by the UN, it lives on in a concurrent resolution. The suckers have swallowed the bait, hook, line and sinker.

¶12(j), on page 4, belies the assertion that freedom of expression is not threatened.

To take all necessary and appropriate action, in conformity with
international standards of human rights, to combat hatred, discrimination,
intolerance and acts of violence, intimidation and coercion motivated by intolerance
based on religion or belief, as well as incitement to hostility and violence, with
particular regard to members of religious minorities in all parts of the world;

For the Morons among my readers, “all necessary and appropriate action” means legislation to combat “incitement to hostility and violence”, which means: Fitna, the Motoons and this blog post.

No doubt the Moronic chorus will begin chanting: “that ain’t in the resolution under discussion”. To which I gleefully reply:  Ye Suckers!!! Assumptions make asses of you!

Adopting measures to criminalize the incitement to imminent violence
based on religion or belief;

¶5(f) on page 5 of Draft resolution XVII, proves you wrong. “Adopting measures to criminalize” is a code phrase for legislation. They are demanding passage & enforcement to establish criminal punishment for publications such as Fitna, the Motoons and this blog post. Remember, Ban Ki-Moon defined the terms for us.

“U.N. Tackles Religious Intolerance without Limiting Free Speech

Legislation to criminalize the publication of Fitna, the Motoons and this blog post will not limit free speech.  Yeah, right ;=(

December 21, 2011 Posted by | Freedom Of Speech, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment


%d bloggers like this: