Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

All In The Family: Shaima Alawadis: Not Victim of Islamophobia!


All In The Family: Shaima Alawadis: Not Victim of Islamophobia!

Thanks and a tip of the hat to Bare Naked Islam! A few readers with elephantine
memories will recall the mysterious battery of Shaima Alawadis which
precipitated her death.  An obviously forged note was produced,
casting suspicion on an unknown “Islamophobe”. The usual line up of
self-righteous AssWholes proceeded to do their ritual
song & dance blaming “Islamophobia” & ‘hate speech” implying
that “right wing extremist” bloggers caused her death.

Months after the echo of the song reverberated their
last notes, an arrest has been made in the infamous case. The person
arrested is not an Islamophobe inspired to  murder by “extremist”
blog posts.  He is Shaima’s husband.  Her death has the
hallmarks of honoricide.

How convenient to blame her  death on
those who  sound a warning about the damnable doctrines &
practices of Islam including  genocidal conquest, slavery,
barbarian rapine & terrorism.   If the  government
would only silence us, Shaima would still be alive.  Yeah,
right.  I will not hold my breath waiting for an apology
from the LibTards & AssWholes.



View more videos at: http://nbcsandiego.com.

More related stories with numerous
polemical images linked at Bare Naked Islam, linked above.

 

We are all Shaima!

Shame on you: AssWholes! If married to a Muslim, you
very well could join her in the hospital if not the cemetery.  You
exploited a brutal murder for political gain, unjustly accusing the
innocent of  inspiring & inciting murder.  [Emphasis
added.]

4:34. Men are the protectors
and maintainers of
women
, because Allâh has made one of them to
excel the othe
r, and
because they spend (to support them) from their means. Therefore
the righteous women are devoutly obedient (to Allâh and to their
husbands), and guard in the husband’s absence what Allâh orders them to
guard (e.g. their chastity, their husband’s property,
etc.). As to those women on whose part you see ill­conduct,
admonish them (first), (next), refuse to share their beds, (and last) beat them
(lightly, if it is useful), but if they return to obedience, seek not
against them means (of annoyance). Surely, Allâh is Ever Most
High, Most Great.

The parenthetical “lightly, if it is useful”  is not in the
original Arabic text.  Source:  Corpus Quran

(4:34:28)

l-maḍājiʿi

the bed

N – genitive masculine plural
noun

اسم
مجرور
(4:34:29)

wa-iḍ’ribūhunna

and [finally] strike them.

CONJ – prefixed conjunction wa (and)

V – 2nd person masculine
plural imperative verb

PRON – subject pronoun

PRON – 3rd person feminine
plural object pronoun

الواو
عاطفة

فعل أمر والواو ضمير متصل في محل رفع فاعل و«هن» ضمير متصل في محل نصب
مفعول به

(4:34:30)

fa-in

Then if

REM – prefixed resumption
particle

COND – conditional particle

الفاء
استئنافية

حرف شرط

Alternative translations:  http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/4/34/
Tafsir Ibn Kathir teaches against severe beating.

Indeed Moe told his followers not to beat their
wives severely, but in doing so, he let the cat out of the bag. This
text is found on page 651of The Life of Muhammad.

You have rights over your wives and
they have rights over you. You

have the right that they should not defile your bed and that they should

not behave with open unseemliness. If they do, God allows you to put

them in separate rooms and to beat them but not
with severity
. If they

refrain from these things they have the right to their food and clothing

with kindness. Lay injunctions on women kindly, for they are prisoners

with you
having no control- of their persons
. You have taken them only

as a trust from God,3 and you have the enjoyment of their
persons by the


words of God, so
understand (T. and listen to) my words, 0 men, for

I have told you.

———————————-

3. *bi amanati ilah* This is a difficult phrase. It is probably to be
understood in the sense

of Sura 8. 27 and more particularly 33. 72 where the Quranic
commentators differ widely.

See Lane, 102a.

The oral traditions of Moe’s companions amplify the
concept for us.  Moe first told his companions not to beat their
wives, then he revised his order. And don’t beat your wife as you would
your slave girl.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 11, Number 2139:

Narrated Mu’awiyah al-Qushayri:

I went to the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) and asked him:
What do you say (command) about our wives? He replied: Give them food
what you have for yourself, and clothe them by which you clothe
yourself, and do not beat
them, and do not revile them
.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 11, Number 2141:

Narrated Abdullah ibn AbuDhubab:

Iyas ibn Abdullah ibn AbuDhubab reported the Apostle of Allah
(peace_be_upon_him) as saying: Do not beat Allah’s
handmaidens,
but when Umar came to the Apostle of Allah
(peace_be_upon_him) and said: Women have become
emboldened towards their husbands
, he (the Prophet) gave permission to beat
them
. Then many women came round the family of the Apostle of
Allah (peace_be_upon_him) complaining against their husbands. So the
Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) said: Many women have gone round
Muhammad’s family complaining against their husbands. They are not the
best among you.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 1, Number 0142:

Narrated Laqit ibn Sabirah:

I was the leader of the delegation of Banu al-Muntafiq or (the
narrator doubted) I was among the delegation of Banu al-Muntafiq that
came to the Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him). When we reached the
Prophet, we did not find him in his house. We found there Aisha, the
Mother of the Believers. She ordered that a dish called Khazirah should
be prepared for us. It was then prepared. A tray containing dates was
then presented to us. (The narrator Qutaybah did not mention the word
qina’, tray).

Then the Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) came. He asked:
Has anything been served to you or ordered for you? We replied: Yes,
Messenger of Allah. While we were sitting in the company of the
Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) we suddenly saw that a shepherd
was driving a herd of sheep to their fold. He had with him a newly-born
lamb that was crying.

He (the Prophet) asked him: What did it bear, O so and so? He
replied: A ewe. He then said: Slaughter for us in its place a sheep. Do
not think that we are slaughtering it for you. We have one hundred
sheep and we do not want their number to increase. Whenever a ewe is
born, we slaughter a sheep in its place.

(The narrator says that the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) used the
word la tahsabanna, do not think).

I (the narrator Laqit) then said: Messenger of Allah, I have a
wife who has something (wrong) in her tongue, i.e. she is insolent. He
said: Then divorce her. I said: Messenger of Allah, she had company
with me and I have children from her. He said: Then ask her (to obey
you). If there is something good in her, she will do so (obey); and do not beat your
wife as you beat your slave-girl.

I said: Messenger of Allah, tell me about ablution. He said:
Perform ablution in full and make the fingers go through the beard and
snuff with water well except when you are fasting.

Honoricide

The Qur’an depicts the killing of a boy who was
expected to dishonor his parents by taking the wrong path.  The
murder was in anticipation of the birth of a better child who would be
obedient and not sinful.

18:74. Then they both proceeded, till they met a boy, he (Khidr) killed him.
Mûsa (Moses) said: “Have you killed an innocent person who had
killed none? Verily, you have committed a thing “Nukra” (a great
Munkar – prohibited, evil, dreadful thing)!”

18:80. “And as for the boy, his parents were
believers, and we feared lest
he should oppress them by rebellion and disbelief.

18:81. “So we intended that their Lord should
change him for them for one better in righteousnes
s and near to
mercy.

Shari’ah provides no retaliation for killing one’s
offspring or grandchildren.  This is from page 584 of Reliance of
the Traveller.

O1.2 The following are not subject to retaliation:…

(4)  a father or mother (or their fathers or

mothers) for killing their
offspring, or offspring’s


offspring;

Muslims & LibTards: kindly kiss my big, smelly,
deformed & ulcerated foot!

Advertisements

November 9, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , | 1 Comment

Innocence of Muslims Update: OIC Demands Blasphemy Law


Pakistan
addressed the General Assembly on behalf of the OIC.  They demand
international  imposition of Islamic blasphemy law. It is
necessary to highlight their AssWholliness
& hypocrisy; that is the mission of this blog post.  They are
bitching about Innocence of Musalims, Charlie Hebdo’s outrageous
cartoons and Qur’an burning.  Carefully examine the video and
answer these questions:

  1. What does the video say about Muhammad and the cult he founded?
  2. Is it true or false?
  3. Where is the hate they are bitching about?
  4. Where is the incitement they are bitching about?

http://www.eyeontheun.org/assets/attachments/documents/10570item_9_Pakistan_on_behalf_of_OIC.pdf

STATEMENT BY PAKISTAN ON BEHALF OF THE
OIC IN THE GENERAL

DEBATE UNDER AGENDA ITEM 9

Madam President,

I have the honour to make this statement on behalf of the OIC,

The OIC Group unequivocally condemns the recent production of a film in
the

United States called “The Innocence of Muslims” which tries to defame Islam and the

personality of the Holy Prophet Muhammad
(peace be upon Him). This film is a blatant

attempt to provoke religious
hatred
, discrimination
and intolerance
that has led to unfortunate

loss of life and damage to property. In this context, we also strongly
condemn the violence

that resulted in the deaths of a number of people including a US
diplomat.

We note that the Secretary
General of the United Nations, The High


Commissioner for Human Rights
and the President of the United States
have also expressed

their opposition to the film.

Incidents like this clearly demonstrate the urgent
need on the part of States to

introduce adequate protection against acts of hate crimes, hate speech,
discrimination,


intimidation and coercion
resulting from defamation and negative stereotyping of religions,


and incitement to religious
hatred, as well denigration of venerated personalities.

Over the past months, there have been a number of
examples of acts of

incitement to hatred.
These include despicable incidents involving the burning of the Holy

Quran, and the publication of
defamatory cartoons
. OIC countries have repeatedly called on

the Governments concerned to take action to avert these offensive actions but nothing
has

been done on the excuse that such action would be a violation of the freedom of expression.

The OIC underlines that the situation created by the malicious act affirms once
more the

urgency for all States to fully uphold their obligations under
international law”, in particular

articles 19 and 20 olf ICCPR and article 4 of the International

Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination

We disagree. These are not exercises in freedom of expression but deliberate  attempts


to discriminate, defame,
denigrate and vilify Muslims and their beliefs.
Such acts

constitute flagrant incitement
to violence and are therefore in contravention of ICCPR


Articles 19 and 20. It
is therefore abundantly clear that there exists an urgent need to
establish

an internationally acceptable
threshold between freedom of expression and incitement to


violence and hatred.

The OIC has
never advocated any prohibitions on freedom of expression
.
Our

emphasis has been on the need to examine the consequences of unchecked,
unbridled and

irresponsible statements and
actions
made by certain groups and individuals that deliberately

instigate and incite violence
on the basis of religion or belief.
This can include situations

involving religious minorities
or situations in which minorities react violently
either in their

home societies or in societies where their co-religionists are in a
majority.

None of.this is completely uncharted territory. For
instance, we are all aware of

the fact that laws exist in Europe and other countries which impose curbs on anti-Semetic

speech, holocaust denial or
racial slurs
. We need to acknowledge, once and for all, that

Islamophobia in
particular and discrimination on the basis of religion and belief are

contemporary forms of racism
and must be dealt with as such. Not to do so would be a
clear

example of double standards. Islamophobia has to be
treated in law and practice equal to the


treatment given to
anti-Semitism, especially in the legislations. –

We recall the general comment 11 of the Human Rights
Committee and

general comment of the Committee on Elimination of Racial
Discrimination which confirm.

that restricting the freedom of expression on issues relating to racial
discrimination applies

. also for incitement to religious hatred.

The OIC’s resolution on “Combating Intolerance,
Negative Stereotyping And

Stigmatization of; and Discrimination, Incitement to Violence, and
Violence against Persons

based on Religion or Belief” adopted by consensus at the 16th
session of the Human Rights

Council on 24 March 2011, was a concrete attempt: to address this very.
concern by bringing

all the key players on board. The consensus resolution was the -result
of a long and often,

difficult negotiation process.

The OIC welcomes the joint statement by the OIC
Secretary general, Arab

League Secretary general, African Union Commissioner for Peace and
Security and European

Union High Representative for foreign and Security policy in which they
shared the profound

respect for all religion and refuse to, allow religion to be used to
fuel provocation,

confrontation and extremism. They reiterated their strong commitment to
take further

measures and to work for an international consensus on tolerance and full respect of
religion
,       <<<

including on the basis of UN Human rights Council resolution 16/18.

At the heart of the resolution are a series of
practical steps to be taken by states

to combat the ever increasing instances of intolerance, negative stereo-typing,
stigmatization


and discrimination and violence
all over the world. This core issue has been approached in a

manner that is acceptable to
all
so that all stake-holders are bound by the commitments

contained in the text. The OIC believes that there is an urgent need to
take concrete steps

towards the implementation of the plan action contained in the
resolution to avoid the

occurrence of such condemnable
incidents in the future
. If this is not done, there is a very real

chance of a
breakdown of the delicate consensus on this issue as reflected in the
resolution


which would be
unfortunate for all of us.

The OIC remains ready to work with its international
partners at the Human

Rights Council in Geneva, the UN General Assembly in New York to
address and resolve

these critical issues in order to better protect and promote
human rights as well as peace and .


security within our
respective societies.

We also call upon the High Commissioner and her
Office to assist this . important effort.

I thank you.

 

tries to defame

If you were trying to defame someone with a video,
would you derive its dialogue from his original hagiographic biography
and the most authentic oral traditions from his companions?  In
Western legal tradition, defamation involves malicious falsehood.
Exactly what is false about the video’s depiction of Moe?

deliberate provocation

What does the video have to do with religious
hatred, discrimination and intolerance?  It illustrated the hatred
of Muslims who, when they can do it with impunity, murder Christians
and destroy their property.  What is provocative about that? Must
the news media be prevented from reporting on religiously motivated
violence in Africa. Arabia and Asia because it might be
provocative?  What was Moe’s attitude toward infidels? Was it
accurately depicted in the video? What is provocative about that?

unfortunate loss of life

How did the video lead to loss of life? How many of
the rioters saw the video? The riots were deliberately stirred up by
mass media and rabid rants in the mosques. Fortune had nothing to do
with murder and destruction, they are intended effects of the damnable
doctrines of Islam.

What did Christians destroy and whom did they kill
over “Piss Christ” and “The Holy Virgin Mary”?  What is the
difference between Christians and Muslims or their respective doctrines
that explains the widely divergent reactions to disturbing
images?  What did Jesus do?  What did Moe do?  Whom do
Muslims emulate?  Do the murders of Kab Ashraf, Asma Bint Marwan
and Um Qirfa ring a bell?

appeal to authority

The listed authority figures are full of fecal
matter so that it comes out their mouths, which I pointed out in
several blog posts. It ain’t who you know, it is what you know. I know
that the conceptual content of the video is true according to Islam’s
canon.  I know that there is no rational basis for condemning the
video.  I know that the listed authority figures are scared
witless of Islam and seek to appease Muslims.  I do not accept
them as an argument for censorship.

hate crimes, hate speech…

Hate crimes and hate speech do not flow from
defamation or negative stereotyping, they flow from hate. The riots in
Egypt and murders in Bengazi are the fruit of wala wal bara:
“love and hate for the sake of Allah”. Those are hate crimes, for which
the criminals constantly seek pretexts. That is low intensity warfare,
a doctrine borrowed from the Soviets and their ‘non aligned’ clients.

Moe hated Jews and Christians because they perceived
the fraudulent nature of the cult he contrived to ensnare them with
perverted and distorted stories from their scriptures and apocryphal
books. The first surah of the Qur’an reminds Allah why he should want
to burn us. Muslims recite it 17 times each day.  The second surah
says that we are cursed by Allah, angels and men.  The third tells
Muslims that they are the best of peoples raised up for mankind as they
drag us to Islam in chains.  It also tells Muslims that if they
attack us, we will do them no harm.

defamation

It ain’t defamatory unless it is false and
malicious.  Did the video defame Moe when it reported that he
thought he was demon possessed and tried to kill himself?  Before
answering, perhaps you should refer to the first book in Sahih Bukhari
and Ibn Sa’d’s  hadith collection.  Did the video defame Moe
when it depicted him as a pedophile?  Perhaps you should go to
your favorite hadith search engine and look up “six years old” before
answering that. Muttawir ahadith testify to Aisha’s age at marriage and
consummation, with one hadith giving her age as seven.

Did the video defame Moe when it depicted him as a
lecher?  Did he really divert Hafsa from the bedroom on her night
in order to tryst with her slave girl?  Dig into Volume 9 of the
Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, page 88 if memory
serves.   And the murder of Kinana & rape of his widow,
Safiya? True or false?  Look it up in Guillaume’s The Life of
Muhammad and Tabari’, if memory serves, its in Vol. 8.  And the
talking donkey?  Ishaq reveals that it was paid in tribute by an
Egyptian ruler, along with the slave girl and her sister.  The
part about the interview with the donkey is in the Encyclopedia of
Canonical Hadith.

And the command to wage war, killing the men and
enslaving their widows and orphans, is that true? If you read the
Qur’an, surahs 8, 9 & 33, you know the answer.

stereotyping

The video does not say anything about Muslims other
than Moe and his companions who are long since dead.  How does it
stereotype Muslims?  Moe defined and exemplified Islam.  33:21 tells Muslims if they want to meet Allah in
a positive way, they had better emulate Moe.  3:32
tells them to Obey Allah & Moe.  What Moe was, pious believers
are to the extent that they know his sunnah and are able to emulate
it.

If Moe channeled Satan instead of God, which he did,
then in stead of worshiping God, Muslims worship his adversary.
If Moe revealed situational scripture, which he did, then Muslims
follow a fraud: a false prophet.    When we expose the
truth about Allah & Moe, we expose Muslims as demon’s slaves and
members of a crime syndicate.

incitement to religious hatred

How does the video incite religious hatred?
And what is the foul if it did?  Should not an impious fraud which
has murdered millions and enslaves billions be hated?  Exposing
evil is not incitement.  Doing evil is incitement. The terrorism,
riots & murders,. not cartoons, books & videos cause us to hate
Islam.

denigration

Moe was venal, not venerable, Guillaume’s The
Life of Muhammad
and The Sealed Nectar
display the true character and works of Moe; should they be banned for
denigration of a venerable personality?

acts of incitement

Uttering & publishing Innocence of Muslims
is not an act of incitement, it is an act of education:: showing
viewers a fair sample what Moe was and what he did.  The Qur’an is
an insulting incitement; Allah told Moe to recite it in a low voice to
avoid stirring up the pagans.

(And offer your Salah neither aloud nor in a low voice,) Ibn `Abbas
said: “When he prayed with his Companions, he would recite Qur’an
loudly, and when the idolators heard that, they insulted the Qur’an,
and the One Who had revealed it and the one who had brought it. So
Allah said to His Prophet

What was Moe doing when he recited these ayat? How
does recitation of these verses and the rest of the 164
violent verses
comport with ICCPR
19 & 20 CPPCG
3 and ICERD
4?

1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way

1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned
Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as
the Christians). 

3:85. And whoever
seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never
be accepted
of
him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.

3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism,
and real followers of Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal
ways, etc.)] are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind;
you enjoin
Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and
forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has
forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the
Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for
them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are
Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s
Command).

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.” means, the best of
peoples for the people, as you bring them
with chains on their necks
till they embrace Islam
.

3:111. They will do you no
harm, barring a trifling annoyance
; and if they fight against
you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped.

3:112. Indignity is put over
them wherever they may be
, except when under a covenant (of
protection) from Allâh, and from men; they have drawn on themselves the
Wrath of Allâh, and destruction
is put over them
. This is because they disbelieved in
the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.)
of Allâh and killed the Prophets without right. This is because they
disobeyed (Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh’s
disobedience, crimes and sins).

8:39. And fight them until
there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping
others besides Allâh) and the religion
(worship) will all be for Allâh Alone
[in the whole of the world
]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then
certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet
that he should have prisoners of war
(and free them with ransom)
until he had
made a great slaughter
(among his
enemies) in the land. You
desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the
captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is
All-Mighty, All-Wise.

9:29. Fight
against
those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among the people of the Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until
they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves
subdued.

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that
when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd)
you cling heavily to the earth?
Are you pleased with the life of
this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of
the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.

9:39. If
you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment

and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all,
and Allâh is Able to do all things.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the
believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs
shall be the Paradise. They fight in
Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed
. It is a
promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the
Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than
Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is
the supreme success .

9:120. It was not
becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins
of the
neighbourhood to remain behind
Allâh’s Messenger
(Muhammad  when fighting in Allâh’s Cause)
and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer their own lives to his
life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor
hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any
step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an
enemy
but is written to their
credit as a deed of righteousness
. Surely, Allâh wastes not the
reward of the Muhsinûn

9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who
are close to you,
and let them find harshness in you, and know
that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see
V.2:2).

61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that
will save you from a painful torment.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ),
and that
you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and
your lives
, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive
you your sins, and admit you into Gardens
under which rivers
flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn ­ Eternity [‘Adn (Edn)
Paradise], that is indeed the great success.

offensive actions

Publishing videos, cartoons and books along with
burning the Qur’an are symbolic actions which do no objective
harm.  Burning churches, murdering Christians, bombing mass
transit and flying hijacked aircraft into office buildings are
offensive actions which incite us to utter and publish the truth about
Islam.

freedom of expression.

Amendment I

Congress
shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging
the freedom of speech, or of the press
; or the right of
the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a
redress of grievances.

 

George Washington:

If the freedom of speech is taken away
then dumb and silent we may be
led, like sheep to the slaughter.

Since Islam declared and is prosecuting war upon us
it is necessary that we be able to discuss it with honesty, accuracy
and clarity.  The War College and West Point need to be free to
give full and honest instruction in the doctrines and laws of Islam in
the training of our officer corps.  Censorship and political
correctness must be rolled back and stamped out!

Imposition of Islamic blasphemy law would make
Thomas Jefferson a criminal for uttering & publishing his report to
Congress.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

The
ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the
Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all
nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that
it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could
be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and
that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure
to go to heaven.

malicious act

Publishing Innocence of Muslims
is not a malicious act, it simply makes available, for those who wish
to view it, an accurate depiction of a segment of the Life of
Moe.  Rousing the rabble to attack our Embassy & Consulate and
murder our Ambassador and staff were malicious acts.

Enforcement of human rights covenants

is indeed an urgent matter.  The International
Criminal Court must open a case condemning Islam for incitement to war,
racial supremacism and incitement to genocide.  Because Islam
perpetrated the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides and seeks to
commit genocide against Jews, it must be condemned and proscribed by
law.

OIC never advocated

prohibition of free expression; never?  You demanded that Holland
block release of Fitna and
Wilders’ book. You demanded that Denmark prosecute the publisher of the
Motoons.
You promoted the passage of UN resolutions condemning and demanding the
criminalization of criticism of Islam and you demand persecution of the
creator of Innocence
of Muslims
. But you never advocated abridgment of the right of
free speech: Camelshit!

consequences

Cartoons, videos, books and statements do not have
consequences. The barbarian behavior of Muslim mobs is a consequence of
the rabid ranting of Imams at Jumah Salat, not anything we do.
Muslims exploit anything we say or do as a pretext for barbarism but
pretext is not causation, it is rationalization. Ladies and
gentlemen:  Get a God blessed clue for Chrissake!!! I present for
your edification a sentence of Shari’ah from Hedaya, the code of the
Hanifi school of fiqh.

The destruction of the sword  is
incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as
appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
generally received this effect. [
http://www.archive.org/stream/hedaysorguide00hamigoog#page/n154/mode/1up]

minorities react violently

Did Copts burn mosques when Piss Christ and The Holy Virgin Mary
were put on display as ‘art’?  When  Muslims ‘react
violently’, they exemplify the damnable doctrines of Islam and their
own AssWholliness, which alone are the
causes of their violence.

Curbs

on antisemitism & holocaust denial exemplify European stateism, the
USA does not emulate them because of our First Amendment. We allow free
and open debate, secure in the belief that truth will triumph in a
level venue.  Those restrictions on European free speech  do
not serve as a positive model for imposition of Islam’s blaspemy
law.  Islam seeks to prohibit all criticism of Allah, Moe and
their damned war cult because they are indefensible; our factual
evidence and logic can not be refuted. Islam can not prevail in free
debate, so it must silence all critics by force just as Moe
commissioned the assassinations of his critics.

racism

What race is Islam?  Its founder and first
adherents were Arabs but it has conquered and forcibly converted
Africans, Asians and Caucasians.  The existence of both Black and
White Muslims  and the ability to become Muslim without changing
one’s skin pigment or physiognomy serve to devastate the accusation of
racism in thinking minds.  Hurling that epithet is the  last
refuge of  scurrilous politicians and AssWholes.

Islamophobia

Phobia is an irrational fear. After the Accursed
Abomination 11 years ago, we are fully aware of the fact that Islam is
a worthy object of fear, loathing and execration, death & damnation
be upon it! Islam inculcates hatred and incites genocidal
violence.  Hatred of Islam is well founded and rational, not
irrational.

legislation

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/defamation-of-religions-background-info/
contains links to the documents you should read to get a good grip on
the issue of the legislation demanded by the OIC.

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2011/12/21/big-lie-un-drops-call-to-outlaw-defamation-of-religions/
tackles the issue of Res 16/18 in detail.

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2012/09/20/ad-hoc-cmte-war-on-free-speech/

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2010/03/20/ad-hoc-committee-new-resolutions/
This pair of blog posts will acquaint you with a parallel process
running below the radar of mass media.  The Ad Hoc Committee on
Elaboration of Complementary Standards meets for ten days each spring
and fall for the purpose of coding Islam’s blasphemy laws into a
binding protocol to ICERD.  If they succeed and the President
signs the damn thing, kiss the First Amendment  goodbye
forever.  The Iranian proposal and the non paper paper are
essential to understanding what they propose to do.

tolerance & respect

Tolerance is a two way street. Islam is intolerant.
Go back and re-read 3:85 and the context of 3:110. That is
intolerance, not tolerance.  How in Hell can anyone who declares
perpetual war against Jews & Christians
lecture us about
tolerance?  Only by supreme AssWholliness!

Respect must be earned; Islam has not earned it and
is no more respectable than it is tolerable.  I can not tolerate
propagation of the idea that my blood and property are not sacred; that I have
no human rights and its open season.  I can not tolerate that
which declares and war against me.

I can not respect a G’d’d demon who demands genocide
as the price of admission to his Celestial Bordello. I can not respect a pederast
who claimed divine sanction for his marriage to his
best friend’s six year old daughter.  I can not respect a
false prophet who attributed to his idol what his idol did not say, asserting divine sanction for his sexual proclivities.

promote peace and security

The highlighted clause in this sentence fragment is
a thinly veiled threat:  threatening violence if we do not submit
to censorship. By God, I will never submit!!!

…to
address and resolve these critical issues in order to better protect and promote
human rights as well as peace and .


security within our
respective societies.

Peace and
security can only be promoted by making Islam extinct.

September 28, 2012 Posted by | Ahadith, GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Hillary Clinton: Traitor; Collaborating With the Enemy


From IINA comes notice on August 1 that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton plans to host coordination meetings with the OIC on how to implement HRC Resolution 16/18 “on combating defamation of religions, and how to prevent stereotypes depicting religions and their followers; as well as disseminating religious tolerance”.

This quote from the P.R. is crucial.

According to informed sources in the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, the two sides, in addition to other European parties, will hold a number of specialized meetings of experts in law and religion in order to finalize the legal aspect on how to better implement the UN resolution.

Does anyone remember how the promotion of the resolution claimed that the “defamation concept” was deprecated in favor of “negative stereotyping” so that freedom of expression is not threatened by the resolution?

Methodologies supposedly include education (indoctrination) controverting speech and “inter-religious dialog”.  So why involve legal experts?  Whence comes the need or mandate for legislation?

How could any such legislation possibly be squared with the First Amendment?   The next paragraph reinforces its predecessor, pay careful attention:

The sources said that the upcoming meetings aim at developing a legal basis for the UN Human Rights Council’s resolution which help in enacting domestic laws for the countries involved in the issue, as well as formulating international laws preventing inciting hatred resulting from the continued defamation of religions.
  • enacting domestic laws
  • formulating international laws
    • preventing
      • inciting hatred
        • continued defamation of religions

How is it possible create a justiciable  definition of “defamation of religions” ?  Why in Hell is anyone seriously considering the matter?   Religions are not subject to proof, they are matters of faith.  Either you believe or you don’t. Its your choice, and everyone else has the same choice.  If others have differing opinions of your personal superstition and express them, what harm is done? Is your faith so weak that it can not withstand questioning?

Geert Wilders truthfully illustrated the nexus between Islamic doctrine expressed in the Qur’an and exemplified in the hadith with modern examples of rabble rousing, mob violence & terrorism.  His documentary was condemned as “hate speech” and “incitement to violence”. He was tried twice and acquitted.  Wilders did not incite mob violence, Imams did at Jumah Salat. The riots happened after Friday prayer services; no coincidence.

Had Hitler claimed divine revelation and founded a pseudo religion, Churchill could have been brought up on charges of defamation for criticizing Hitler’s cult.   That is exactly what Moe did 1400 years ago.  When poets criticized him in verse, Moe had them murdered.  Such a nice man. How great a role model. In the last decade of his life, Moe started a battle on the average of every six weeks.  How peaceful!

Moe married the six year old daughter of his best friend; she was still playing with dolls three years later when he consummated the marriage.  There areseveral muttawir ahadith describing her age, another gives it as seven.   Exposing these facts is condemned as “hate speech”.

Moe commanded the Muslims to wage perpetual war culminating in global conquest; until only Allah is worshiped and Jews & Christians are subjugated and submit to annual extortion. Moe raided one local Jewish settlement, killing all the men and adolescent boys after they surrendered. Exposing these facts is condemned as “inciting violence”.

No! !!!   Hate speech is telling Allah 17 times per day why he should burn us. “1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way  1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).  ”

Hate speech is cursing us: “2:161. Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind, combined. ”

Hate speech is defaming us: “98:6. Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and Prophet Muhammad ()) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.

Incitement to violence is: “8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

Incitement to violence is: “9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Incitement to violence is threatening eternal damnation for shirking and promising eternity in the celestial whore house for participating in violence: “9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.
9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things. ”

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!  61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn ­ Eternity [‘Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.

What do you call a cult whose demon demands great slaughter as the price of admission to paradise?  What do you call a cult that promises rewards for any step taken to injure or enrage disbelievers?

I have not engaged in hate speech neither have I engaged in incitement to violence.; I have described and documented them.  Not “radicalism”; not “extremism”; that is standard, off the shelf, mainstream Islam, violent by design because Moe got his income from plundering his victims.    Like it or not, that is the fatal fact. If you doubt it, you can find full documentation here: Islam’s Mercenary Mission.

    OIC Secretary General, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, was quoted thusly:

He added that the reports of the OIC Islamophobia Observatory for the years 2009 and 2010 had included several warnings about an organized political form which the extreme right may transform into through its parties’ legislation.


    They want to make it illegal to organize parties  and campaign on anti-Islamic platforms.   Their apologists are already bitching bitterly about statements made by Gingrich, West, Cain and other candidates.

Read between the lines, see what they are really doing, wake up, wise up and rise up.  The traitors who do Islam’s bidding must be removed from power in the next election cycle.  Those who are weak kneed,. and lack the courage to speak out must be removed with them and replaced by true patriots. Collaborating with the enemy is not acceptable!

August 4, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , | Leave a comment

Geert Wilders Trial: Refresher Course


The purpose of this blog post is to remind readers of the background information essential to comprehending the resumption of the trial of Geert Wilders.

This quote is from an English translation of the summons which lists the accusations against  Geert Wilders.  The summons is 24 pages long, detailing many statements.

The aforementioned summoned person is charged with the fact that
1.
he, on one or more dates in or about the period from 8 August 2007 up to and including 27 March 2008, in The Hague and/or Amsterdam and/or (elsewhere in) the Netherlands, on multiple occasions, at least once, (each time) in public, orally, in writing or through images, intentionally offended a group of people, i.e. Muslims, based on their religion, by (each time) intentionally in
– De Volkskrant and/or
– on the internet on the website http://www.liveleak.com (in the film Fitna)
placing (having placed) and/or showing (having showed) and/or having heard one or more texts and/or images and/or footage and/or audio fragments with the following content:
(De Volkskrant of 8 August 2007, ‘Enough is enough: prohibit the Quran’)
„A moderate Islam does not exist. It does not exist because there is no distinction between Good Islam and Bad Islam. There is Islam and that is it. And Islam means the Quran and nothing but the Quran. And the Quran is the Mein Kampf of a religion that intends to eliminate others and that refers to those others – non-Muslims – as unfaithful dogs, inferior beings. Read the Quran, this Mein Kampf, again. In whatever version, you will see that all the evil that the sons of Allah commit to us and themselves originates from this book (Oriana Fallaci, The Force of Reason, post-script, page 305, February 2006).‟…

2.
he, on one or more dates in or about the period from 7 October 2006 up to and including 27 March 2008, in The Hague and/or Amsterdam and/or (elsewhere in) the Netherlands, on multiple occasions, at least once, (each time) in public, orally, in writing or through images, incited to hatred of people, i.e. Muslims, based on their religion, by (each time) in
– De Volkskrant and/or
– De Pers and/or
– Dagblad De Limburger-Limburgs Dagblad and/or
on the internet
– on the website http://www.geenstijl.nl and/or http://www.pvv.nl and/or
– on the website of Radio Nederland Wereldomroep and/or the Wereldomroep and/or
– on the website http://www.liveleak.com (in the film Fitna)

[Emphasis added.]

Notice the prominent mention of Fitna, the publication of which is the basic issue, condemned by many government leaders, the OIC, and the Secretary General of the United Nations.  The summons goes on to describe the images in the video and list statements made therein.

The first charge is intentionally offending Muslims.  The statute, cited on the last page of the summons,  makes the issue cut and dried.

Article 137c Dutch Penal Code

  • o 1. He who publicly, verbally or in writing or image, deliberately expresses himself in an way insulting of a group of people because of their race, their religion or belief, or their hetero- or homosexual nature or their physical, mental, or intellectual disabilities, will be punished with a prison sentence of at the most one year or a fine of third category.
  • o 2. If the offence is committed by a person who makes it his profession or habit, or by two or more people in association, a prison sentence of at the most two years or a fine of fourth category will be imposed.

 Article 137d Dutch Penal Code

  • o 1. He who publicly, verbally or in writing or in an image, incites hatred against or discrimination of people or violent behaviour against person or property of people because of their race, their religion or belief, their gender or hetero- or homosexual nature or their physical, mental, or intellectual disabilities, will be punished with a prison sentence of at the most one year or a fine of third category.
  • o 2. If the offence is committed by a person who makes it his profession or habit, or by two or more people in association, a prison sentence of at the most two years or a fine of fourth category will be imposed.

Truth is not a defense in the statute.  How shall the defendant establish proof of his intent?  The law, as written, criminalizes truthful speech on the grounds of perceived insult & inciting hatred, discrimination or violence.

Geert Wilders is an elected member of the Dutch Parliament, in that position, he is entitled to discuss public policy.  Islamization is a legitimate subject for public discourse; it is taking place in Europe.

Fitna can be viewed in its entirety by clicking this link. It is divided into two parts on Youtube.  I will embed the two parts here so that you can view them.
You will see a few verses from the Qur’an  and an English translation .  You will hear an Arabic recitation and see graphic depictions of the practical application of the verses.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37w-aXGk8M0


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwwsnAr3rY8

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

Who expressed hatred in that video?  Who incited violence in that video?    The Qur’an, not Geert Wilders  is the source of hate and incitement.  Wilders exposed hate & incitement, he did not perform it.

My earlier blog posts relevant to the trial are linked in the list below.

October 5, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Islamic Extortion Letter to Obama


On March  30, 2010, Logan’s Warning published an article  exposing Revolution Muslim’s latest assault against  our way of life. The article included this video.

[If the embed code does not work, click this link to watch it on YouTube.]

The eleven minute video includes several insane rants that should outrage every loyal American.  It also includes a reading of the open letter described below.

Revolution Muslim has uttered and published an open letter, in the form of a petition, which threatens the United States of America in general and its President in particular with violent attack.

The petition opens with an arrogant  self-identification and barbarian threat  emulating the form and style of Islam’s damnable Profit.

In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Most Merciful1 – This letter is from the Muslim Nation (ummah), the followers of the Last and Final Prophet to mankind, Muhammad son of Abdullah2 (May Peace and Blessings be Upon him), to Barack Obama, the ruler of the United States of America – May Peace be upon those who follow the right path and true guidance.3
  1. They claim to speak for Allah, who allegedly had one final spokesman: Moe, who, thank God,was silenced by death in 632.
  2. They claim to speak for Ummah al-Islamiyya, which has no Caliph since the dissolution of the Caliphate by Attaturk, and therefore has no one to speak for it.
  3. The last sentence of the opening paragraph is a thinly veiled threat.  If peace is upon the followers of true guidance (the Qur’an) then  by default, war is upon those who reject  the Qur’an.

The second paragraph makes the dawa explicit and restates the implicit threat.

We invite you to Islam4 and want to inform you that if you become a Muslim you will be safe5 and Allah will double your reward,6 but if you reject this invitation to Islam you will be committing a sin by misguiding your subjects and admirers and Allah will humiliate you for warring against His (elevated above all is He) intimate trustees.
  1. This is the explicit dawa; President Obama has been invited to publicly embrace Islam and make it the national religion, in contravention of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution.
  2. This is a restatement of the implicit threat, safety and war being the alternative outcomes dependent on the choice of Islam or kufr.
  3. This clause is an emulation of Moe’s extortion letters. Compare it to this sentence from his letter to Heracles:  “… Allah shall reward you doubly…”.

The third paragraph quotes the Qur’an 3:64, which demands that we deny Jesus Christ. Read the context or  Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir to verify this fact.

In the fourth paragraph, the authors  criticize President Obama’s campaign tactics and the perceived results of his first year in office. While calling him a tyrant, they accuse the United states of having an empire.

In their screed’s fifth paragraph, the authors quote Thomas Paine before waxing irrational and inverting fact and logic while bitterly bitching about our and Israel’s retaliation against Islamic aggression.

In their sixth paragraph, the authors continue to fulminate  irrationally about our foreign policy and denounce our efforts to suppress Islamic terrorism.  Their seventh paragraph segues into domestic policy while maintaining the same level of irrationality.  The irrational fulminations are followed by an enumerated list of demands that we surrender in Afghanistan & Iraq,  shut down our military bases,  end our support of Israel and disassociate from the Islamic regimes they seek to overthrow and replace with pure theocracy.

The screed concludes with  a dense summation which requires detailed dissection.

If you do this than there will be peace between us and you7. Allah says in the Quran, “and if the enemy inclines toward peace, then you incline to it and put your trust in Allah (8:61).”8 We call you to peace Mr. Obama, we only want to live under the laws and culture that God has granted us in the Qur’an, free from American dictate, free from empire and colonialism9. In the event you establish these policies then over $1 trillion will be available to spend on your own people.10 They can have food, clothing, shelter, healthcare, education and more. The American Empire is going bankrupt and all because of its War on Islam.11 We tell you the Muslim nation has never suffered under occupation for long and that our true creed does not allow us to practice our religion but hand over soveverignty in the realm of politics, economics and society to a foreign force. Islam dominates in every aspect of the word and is never dominated.12 It is a superior system as it is Divine and from the Creator Himself. We call you to the religion that is the only acceptable way of life in the eyes of Allah and we warn you of a personal and societal humiliation in the event that you obstinately persist and do not heed this call13.
  1. This is a repetition of the threat: if we do not accede to their demands, they will make war on us.
  2. The quote of 8:61  is out of context. 8:60 commands Muslims to build the largest army they can to “strike terror into the hearts of the enemies” [Abdullah Yusuf Ali].
  3. They declare that they want to live by the Qur’an, free from American dictate, empire & colonialism.   America does not dictate domestic policies in Arabia, nor do we have an empire nor colonies.  It is Islam that seeks empire and colonies.  If they want to live under Shari’ah, what are they doing in New York City?  They should be in Mecca.
  4. If we abandon our national defense, nothing will be available for domestic spending, because we will be conquered. Besides which, the dichotomy is false on its face.  National defense is a necessity for the preservation of food, clothing, shelter and every other good and service. Those goods and services are created by private enterprise, not by the federal government.
  5. We do not have a war on Islam, Islam is at war against us; our government is blind to the fatal fact.  This state of denial must come to an end, and soon if we wish to preserve our liberty and prosperity.
  6. Islam dominates!  Our elected leaders seem to be ignorant of Islamic supremacism.  9:33 tells us that Allah sent Moe to make Islam superior. The concept is repeated in 48:28 and confirmed in Sahih Bukhari 4.52.65 with these words:  “He who fights that Allah’s Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights in Allah’s Cause.”
  7. The demand  for surrender and threat of attack is repeated one last time.

The petition  has 340 signatures.

The demon spawn rallied on a New York sidewalk,  promoting their open letter to Obama, cursing him, cursing democracy; inciting hatred and violence.  If the content and style of this video don’t outrage you, you need psychiatric care.

[If the embeded code does not work, click this link to watch the video on YouTube.]

What are you going to do about it?  While those demon spawn were cursing America, our way of life and our President,  a new resolution  “Combating Defamation of Religions”, complaining of incitement of hatred and violence, was fresh off the presses, with the ink still wet.   What will you do about it?  Will you roll over and go back to sleep or will you rise up in protest?

It is time for those America haters who threaten us with violent attack to go home. The citizenship of those who were born here should be revoked and they should be shipped out with one way tickets. The Mosques, Madrassas & Islamic Centers should be closed for good.  The enemies of America should be removed and kept out.

We can’t do it, because Islam wears the false cloak of religion.  Because it is assumed to be a religion, it is under the protection of the First Amendment’s Free Exercise clause.   We must amend the Constitution to acknowledge the fact that Islam is a war cult, not a legitimate religion.  The first step in that long process is to sign and promote the Outlaw Islam! petition.  After signing the petition, copy it and paste it into an email to everyone you can influence. Urge them to sign and forward it.

At the end of November, the Ad Hoc Committee will meet for the purpose of writing a protocol to ICERD which will make this blog post and all negative information about Islam illegal.  There is only one  defense, a counter attack.  We must take Islam to  the World Court for its egregious violations of ICERD,  ICCPR & CPPCG.  Those international human rights covenants, if enforced,  require that Islam be proscribed by law for supremacism,  incitement & genocide.  If you love liberty, particularly free speech, then you will sign and promote the International Qur’an Petition.  If you won’t take this simple step to preserve free speech, who will?  If you  won’t do it now, it will soon be too late.  Now is the time to sign these petitions and send them to your family, friends, associates and acquaintances with an exhortation to sign and forward the petitions.

Revolution,Muslim,hate speech,incitement,extortion

April 4, 2010 Posted by | Islam | , , , , | Leave a comment

U.S.A. vs Durban Declaration


A press release distributed by Press Zoom  appears to be taken from the records of the Third Committee, describing the debate and voting on several resolutions before the committee.

Those resolutions included the five-part draft text on global efforts for the total elimination of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and the comprehensive implementation of and follow-up to the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action ( document A/C.3/64/L.54/Rev.1 ), which was introduced by the representative of Sudan, on behalf of the Group of 77 and China.

32. Calls upon all States, in accordance with the commitments undertaken in paragraph 147 of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action,1 to take all necessary measures to combat incitement to violence motivated by racial hatred,
including through the misuse of print, audio-visual and electronic media and new communication technologies
, and, in collaboration with service providers, to promote the use of such technologies, including the Internet to contribute to the fight against racism, in conformity with international standards of freedom of expression and taking all necessary measures to guarantee that right;

33. Encourages all States to include in their educational curricula and social programmes at all levels, as appropriate, knowledge of and tolerance and respect for all cultures, civilizations, religions, peoples and countries, as well as information on the follow-up to and implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action; [Emphasis added.]

Paragraph 32 quoted above is aimed directly at all criticism of Islam.  Its practical implementation is best illustrated by the words of Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.” [Emphasis added for clarity.]

The man chiefly responsible for enforcing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights asserts that there is no right to tell the truth about Islam. Fitna is not hate speech nor is it incitement; it accurately depicts Islamic hate speech and incitement.  The pending  trial of Geert Wilders on charges of hate speech is a prime example of  the violation of freedom of expression intended by the sponsors of this resolution.

Paragraph 33 encourages turning our schools into instruments  of propaganda & indoctrination, bordering on proselytizing.  It is impossible for an informed and rational person to tolerate or respect Islam because Islam is supremely intolerant and denies our rights and dignity in addition to declaring perpetual war against us.

Speaking in explanation of vote before the vote, the representative of the United States said his country was deeply committed to fighting racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance at home and abroad.  Its founding commitment to the principle that all people were created equal was manifested in its own legislation and its work around the world.  Among other things, the United States had, in October, presented an action plan during the meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee on the elaboration of complementary standards. [Emphasis added for clarity.]

The bold faced clause is composed of three code phrases for ‘Islamophobia’.  The preliminary meeting to prepare for the Durban II Racism Conference redefined racism to include criticism of Islam.

Emphasizes the urgent need to address the scourges of anti-Semitism, Christianophobia, and Islamophobia as contemporary forms of racism as well as racial and violent movements based on racism and discriminatory ideas directed at African, Arab, Christian, Jewish, Muslim and other communities; [Emphasis added for clarity, spelling original.]

Obamanation is “deeply committed to fighting” criticism of Islam. Their whining about freedom of expression is a smoke screen to cover their actual intent: to silence all criticism of Islam and the  regime’s Socialist agenda.


He said the United States had been unable to support the Durban Review Conference because it supported the 2001 World Conference, in toto.  The United States was deeply concerned about hateful speech, but did not agree that the best way to combat such speech was by its prohibition.  Rather, the United States believed an effective approach was based on three key elements, including robust legal protections against hate crimes, outreach to religious groups and vigorous defence of freedom of expression.  It regretted having to vote “no” on this text and looked forward to working together with the international community.  It remained deeply committed to ongoing, thoughtful dialogue on combating racism and racial discrimination.
[Emphasis added for clarity, spelling original.]

“Hateful speech” is code for any negative expression about Islam, including  Fitna: and the Danish Cartoons. Notice that the regime is concerned about the outcome: silencing all criticism, they seek an  “effective approach”, a method that will result in silence.

“Hate crimes”: if any expression should be criminalized, that is the one. Assaulting, killing or harassing  anyone is a crime, regardless of the victim’s identity, religion, gender, etc. There is no group of persons more deserving of protection than any other.

“Outreach to religious groups” is  code for pandering to Islam, submitting to its outrageous demands. Islam’s most outrageous demand is that we submit and become Muslims.  We might as well be bitten by Dracula and become vampires.  Islamic law forbids any and all negative expression about Allah, Moe, the Qur’an & the laws  they issued.  If you doubt this, open Reliance of the Traveller to O8.7 and read the list of acts which entail leaving Islam, the penalty for which is death (O8.2).  For the law’s applicability to non-Muslims, see  O11.10(5).

Far from being a saintly Prophet, Moe was a pedophile who married the six year old daughter of his best friend. He  solicited the murder of critics. He was guilty of  genocide; preaching and practicing it.

Far from being a  “great religion of peace”, Islam is a mercenary war cult, contrived for the purpose of enriching and empowering its founder by perpetuating war so that he could accrue the spoils.

Islam’s objective in demanding blasphemy laws & censorship is to disarm us in the war of ideas so that, in the words of George Washington,  “dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter”.

If you are a lover of liberty and the rights ensured by the Bill of Rights, then do your part to preserve them by signing and propagating these petitions. Send their links  to everyone you can hope to influence with an exhortation to sign and forward them.

 

November 28, 2009 Posted by | Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Rhetoric/Incidents: Islam’s Hypocrisy


In the context of  seeking hate crime prosecution in a Californian assault case, CAIR brought up a statement by CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper.

“Our nation’s religious, political and community leaders need to address the growing anti-Muslim rhetoric on the Internet and on talk radio that can lead to such incidents,”

Hooper was demanding enforcement of Islamic blasphemy laws, implying that  assaults on Muslims are directly linked to criticism of Islam by bloggers and talk radio hosts.  He was echoing the rhetoric of U.N. General Assembly and UNHRC resolutions condemning “defamation of Islam”.

  • Deplores the use of the print, audio-visual and electronic media, including the Internet, and any other means to incite acts of violence, xenophobia or
    related intolerance and discrimination against Islam or any other religion, as well as targeting of religious symbols
  • Also urges States to provide, within their respective legal and constitutional systems, adequate protection against acts of hatred, discrimination,
    intimidation and coercion resulting from defamation of religions, to take all possible measures to promote tolerance and respect for all religions and their value systems and to complement legal systems with intellectual and moral strategies to combat religious hatred and intolerance;

More recently, the President of the Ad Hoc Committee On Complementary Standards  issued a “Non-Paper Paper”  outlining strategy for a protocol to ICERD. Pay close attention to this critical excerpt.

5- Incitement to racial, national and religious hatred

  1. There is a need for further clarifying and reinforcing at the international level existing obligations on the eradication of all incitement to hatred and ‘ discrimination in any form and to prohibit by law, propaganda for war and advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to  discrimination, hostility or violence.
  2. In this context, complementary standards to be developed should observe the following parameters:
    • Article 4 of ICERD shall be extended to the crime of incitement to racial hatred covering offenses motivated by religious hatred against immigrant communities.
    • The protection provided shall extend to all individuals and groups within the jurisdiction of the State Party.
    • The prohibitions shall equally cover acts committed by any individual, group or organization, including political and media organizations as well as by national or local public authorities.
    • The provisions shall apply to any act which, in purpose or effect, incites discrimination, hostility or violence.

In recent months, there have been news reports of rioting and anti-Christian pogroms in India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Nigeria & Kenya. When do those events take place? When did the rioting over the Danish Cartoons take place? Why do riots happen immediately after Juma prayer services? What is preached in those sermons?

Muslims want Fiitna and similar revelations criminalize because the connection between the Qur’an & Islamic sermons and riots is revealed therein. They want this and similar blog posts criminalize because I expose their hypocrisy.  Predators who slither in dark crevices and under rocks do not like being exposed in the light of truth.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.” [Emphasis added.]

The Secretary General labeled Fitna “hate speech” & “incitement to violence” . Click the link and watch the documentary. Where is the hate speech? Where is the incitement? They are only in the Qur’an, hadith & Kutbah displayed; they do not flow from the lips of Geert Wilders.

There is plenty of hate speech and incitement to violence in the Qur’an, enough to make Islam a constant static violation of ICERD & ICCPR. This fact is fully documented in the International Qur’an Petition. It is Islam that must be outlawed, not ‘Islamophobia’.

September 2, 2009 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , | 4 Comments

The Censorship Protocol


This is what the IHEU is warning about in their  press release, as the second of three listed threats to liberty.

Call upon all governments to resist the efforts of the “Ad Hoc Committee on Complementary Standards” to alter the ICERD;.

This draft complementary international standards in the fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance has been prepared for the implementation of paragraph 199 of the Program of Action(A/CONF.189/12).

199. Recommends that the Commission on Human Rights prepare complementary
international standards to strengthen and update international instruments against racism, racial
discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance
in all their aspects;

Article 4 of the proposed protocol to ICERD  is titled: Prohibition of Incitement to Racial Hatred.
This article contains several notable provisions.

  1. States Parties condemn all propaganda, practice or organization to justify or encourage any form of hatred or discrimination against persons belonging to groups such as religious groups, refugees, asylum seekers, people displaced, stateless persons, migrants and migrant workers, descent-based communities such as people of African descent, indigenous peoples, minorities and people under foreign occupation.
  2. States Parties undertake to adopt immediate and positive measures designed to eradicate all incitement to such hatred or discrimination, including:
  1. to declare an offense punishable by law all dissemination of ideas to such discrimination or hatred, as well as all acts of violence or incitement to such acts directed against persons belonging to particular groups;
  2. to declare illegal and prohibit organizations and propaganda activities organized and any other type of propaganda which incites hatred or discrimination or who encourages, and to declare punishable by law the involvement in such organizations or activities;
  3. not permit public authorities, national or local, to incite hatred or discrimination;
  4. not to allow political parties to incite hatred or discrimination.
  5. to strengthen their laws or take the legal provisions necessary to prohibit and punish racist and xenophobic platforms and discourage by a democratic debate vigilant the integration of political parties promoting these platforms in Government to legitimise their implementation alliances.

This protocol to ICERD would become International law, binding on signatories, and a provision in  Article 17 prohibits reservations. We need a definition of terms:

  • justify or encourage any form of hatred or discrimination
  • incites hatred
  • racist and xenophobic

Here is a clue from Article 6.

The fundamental characteristic of all the events to certain religions and descriditer to insult people or groups who share the religion, commonly called “defamation of religions” and all the fear and religious discrimination is inciting racial hatred For religious and address the issue of defamation of religions in a universal, it is essential to bring this discussion to the international instruments on human rights.

According to that, anyone who says or writes anything negative about Islam incites racial hatred.  Is that clear yet?  Examine what U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said about Geert Wilders’ Fitna:.

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”[Reuters]

Geert Wilders quoted the Qur’an and displayed images of rabble rousing Imams and their followers, along with some of the results of their preaching.  Ban Ki-moon says that constitutes hate speech and incitement to violence.

Masood Khan quoted Ban Ki-Moon’s representative to the Alliance of Civilizations as declaring Fitna to be ” a deliberate incitement to discrimination,  violence and hatred on grounds of religion, aimed at provoking and promoting social unrest”. [Masood Khan’s statement of 04/01/08]

If  we accurately describe Islam’s doctrines & practices, quoting its canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence, we are automatically convicted of hate speech; inciting violence. This is part of an Orwellian campaign to dis-arm us, to render us incapable of warning against Islamic aggression.

This protocol would outlaw two American and two European political parties for their anti-Islam platforms.  Muhammad, claimed to be the best and greatest of men, worthy of emulation as a role model was a murderer, pedophileterrorist. For genuine hate speech and incitement to violence, read the Qur’an, don’t stop there, read the next six verses. Is cursing Jews & Christians hateful enough for you? How about genocide? He killed all the men of a Jewish village after they surrendered, then he examined the boys for pubic hair and slaughtered those who had it.

Islam seeks to criminalize its critics because it has no defense against the facts contained in its own canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence.  Moe had good reason for forbidding his followers to carry the Qur’an into Dar al-Harb: “That is out of fear that the enemy will get hold of it.”

Don’t just sit there waiting for the noose to be placed on your neck.  Send an email to your Senators, and to President Obama. Tell them that the proposed protocol is unacceptable. Tell them that you consider support for it to be tantamount to treason.  You can send your email through the Federal Officers link at http://www.congress.org/ . Include a link to this blog post in your email so that your Senators can become informed.

March 24, 2009 Posted by | Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , | 3 Comments

   

%d bloggers like this: