Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Freedom of Expression~Democracy


Freedom of Expression~Democracy
META NAME=”DESCRIPTION” CONTENT=”Our duty is to expose evil, not to conceal it. If exposure of their damnable doctrines & practices pisses off Muslims, their reactions are their own doing and responsibility, not ours. Our lectures, remarks, blog posts and books are for the Western audience of free men who wish to remain alive and free, not for Allah’s slaves who are Hellbound to torment us. “>

A/C.3/68/L.48
Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization,
discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons,
based on religion or belief continues with reaffirmation of another
obfuscation.

Reaffirming also the positive role
that the exercise of the right to freedom of


opinion and
expression and full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and impart


information
can play in strengthening democracy
and combating religious


intolerance,
and reaffirming further that the exercise of the right to freedom of
expression carries with it special duties and responsibilities, in
accordance with
article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,

expression & democracy

  • positive role that the exercise of the right to freedom of
    opinion and expression and full respect for the freedom to seek,
    receive and impart
    information can play in strengthening democracy

    Freedom of expression and information are essential
to maintenance of democracy.  Without them, it becomes impossible
to recognize, criticize and warn against impending tyranny. 
Liberty can not survive without freedom of expression.

religious intolerance

  • combating religious intolerance

    That clause contains an embedded false premise which
must be exposed and condemned:  ‘Intolerance of Islam must be
combated.”. Every free man has a right and duty to be intolerant of
existential threats to his life, liberty and form of government. There
can be no tolerance for Imperialistic doctrines such as Nazism and
Communism. Islam is another intolerable threat to the human race.

    In reality, Islam is not a religion: it is a deen; a
way of life having religious, social, governmental and military
components. Islam’s military component, called Jihad, is its highest peak. The quote comes from page 1290 of Tirmidhi.

“Its head is Islam, its pillar is
Salah and the
apex of its hump is jihad
.”

Moe said: “I
have been raised for Jihad

and I am not raised for tillage.” He also said that Jihad is the
original religion of Islam and Allah will curse Muslims for abandoning
it.

Sunan Abu Dawud 23.3455

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction,
hold the tails
of oxen, are
pleased with agriculture, and
give up conducting jihad
(struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over
you,
and will not withdraw it until you return to your original
religion.

    Does that refer to Jihad an-Nafs: striving against
the ego and temptation? How is that an alternative to agriculture and
trade as a means of deriving income?  How does one get killed
or kill others
in striving against temptation?  How does one injure
or enrage disbelievers
in Jihad an-Nafs?

    Was objection to the Nazi invasion of Europe 
an intolerance to be combated?  Was objection to the attack on
Pearl harbor an intolerance to be combated?  Then neither is
condemnation of the doctrines which inspired the Hindu genocide,
Armenian genocide, Assyrian genocide or the attacks on Beslan, London,
Madrid or New York City and Boston  intolerance to be combated.

special duties and responsibilities

    It is not possible to be and remain free without
free speech.  Another critical sentence in the resolution declares
that terrorism must not be associated with any religion. Is terrorism
an intrinsic sacrament of Christianity or Buddhism? But it is an
intinsic sacrament of Islam: 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
33:26,27,
47:4,49:15,
59:2,13, 61:10-13;
Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  so why in Hell should we be made
to keep silent about it?

    In the most damnable words of the most damnable engineers
of the God damn Abomination: 

“Therefore, killing
you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you
,
responding back to your
attacks, are all considered to be great
legitimate duty in our religion
….

So, our
religion is a religion of fear and terror to the enemies of God: the
Jews, Christians
, and pagans.
With God’s wiling, we are terrorists
to the bone
. So, many thanks
to God

    Our duty is to expose evil, not to conceal it. If
exposure of their damnable doctrines & practices pisses off
Muslims, their reactions are their own doing and responsibility, not
ours. Our lectures, remarks, blog posts and books are for the Western
audience of free men who wish to remain alive and free, not for Allah’s
slaves who are Hellbound to torment us. 

    There is no duty or responsibility to avoid pissing
off evildoers by exposing their evil.  Imams are always on the
lookout for real or imaginary offenses with which to rouse the rabble
to riot. The MoToons did not cause riots: rabble rousing rants
at Jumah Salat did. Fitna
did not cause riots: rabble rousing rants did.  The
Innocence of Muslims

did not cause riots: rabble rousing rants did. Moe never threw a bomb
because he died before the invention of explosives. The MoToons, while
exaggerated, were conceptually true.  Fitna is well documented.
Innocence of Muslims is backed up by authentic texts of Sira.

    President Washington said it best


If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be
led, like sheep to the slaughter.

November 9, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , | 3 Comments

Morsi @ UN: Spew of Feces


http://gadebate.un.org/sites/default/files/gastatements/67/EG_en.pdf

In the name of Allah, the Most
Gracious, the Most Merciful

 

Arrogant AssWhole

The demon only has one spokesman: the caliph; the caliphate was
dissolved by Attaturk; there is no caliph. Morsi, Zardari & co. are
wannabes.

Egypt also considers that the extremely
valuable contribution of the

Arab world within the wider Islamic sphere is of vital necessity to
promote

joint action within the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. Egypt will
exert

all efforts to ensure that the next OIC conference, to be held early
next year

in Egypt, strengthens mutual understanding between Islamic countries and

the rest of the world, and sets in motion the principles of the
dialogue of

civilizations, and gets rid of the causes of misunderstanding used by
fanatics

on both sides to wrongly prove that differences between us are great,
and

achieve political goals completely unrelated to the ideals of
religions, as well

as to human values and ethics.

mutual understanding

Mutual understanding must be based on factual
knowledge, not fiction, deception or wishful thinking.
Understanding Islam requires, at minimum, reading the Qur’an and at
least one hadith collection.

differences

We worship YHWH, the God of Israel. Muslims worship
Allah, a pagan capricious and hateful moon deity. We seek peace, they
seek global conquest. We believe in equality, they believe in
supremacism.

causes of misunderstanding

Misunderstanding results from a combination of
ignorance, false assumptions, al-taqiyya & kitman.  In sum:
ignorance, lies & obfuscation.

fanatics

How bizarre it is to hear that word flow from the
lips of a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, which consists of
believers, as defined in 9:111, who fight for global domination. When you
read the charter of HAMAS,
you read their manifesto. Only liars and damned fools assert the
existence of radical or extremist Muslims. Islam has a standard,
enshrined in the Qur’an and exemplified by Moe’s sunnah. That is what
Islam is, nothing else is Islam.  For a significant sample, visit:
https://snooper.wordpress.com/whats-wrong-with-islam-muslims/
.

ideals of religions

Legitimate religions seek to perfect understanding
of and our relationship with God and our fellow men.  Islam was
created for the purpose of its founder’s personal emolument through the
professional practice of piracy and extortion. I disrespectfully direct
doubters, dissenters & deniers to:

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2009/08/30/islams-mercenary-mission/
.

Egypt would like to stress that the
international system will not get

fixed as long as the application of double standards remains. We expect
from

others, as they expect from us, that they respect our cultural
particularities

and religious points of reference, and not seek to impose concepts that
are

unacceptable to us or politicize certain issues and use them as a
pretext to

intervene in the affairs of others.

What Muslims and migrants are going through in a number of regions

worldwide, in terms of discrimination and violation of their human
rights,

and vicious campaigns against what they hold sacred, is unacceptable.
It is

opposed to the most basic principles of the Charter of the Organization

where we meet today. These practices have become pervasive enough that

they now carry a name: Islamophobia.

We must join hands in confronting these regressive ideas that hinder

cooperation among us. We must act together in the face of extremism,

discrimination, and incitement to hatred on the basis of religion or
race. The

General Assembly, as well as the Security Council, has the principal

responsibility in addressing this phenomenon that is starting to have

implications that clearly affect international peace and security.

The obscenities recently released as part of an organized campaign

against Islam’s sanctities is unacceptable and requires a firm stand.
We have

a responsibility in this international gathering to study how we can
protect

the world from instability and hatred. Egypt respects freedom of
expression.

One that is not used to incite hatred against anyone. One that is not
directed

towards one specific religion or culture. A freedom of expression that
tackles

extremism and violence. Not the freedom of expression that deepens

ignorance and disregards others. But we also stand firmly against the
use of

violence in expressing objection to these obscenities.

 

double standard

Islam denies the paternity, deity, crucifixion,
death & resurrection of Jesus Christ and reveres him as a genocidal
war lord who will lead them in exterminating the Jews. I
disrespectfully direct doubters, dissentetrs & deniers
to:  https://snooper.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/the-defamation-of-jesus-christ/.

Islam labels Jews as earning Allah’s wrath and Christians as
going astray,
curses us and calls us the worst of living creatures besides declaring perpetual war against us.

Islam demands the head of anyone who “mentions something impermissible” about Moe, Allah or Islam.
Double standard!

respect

Respect is paid where respect is due. Islam is not
respectable.  It is impossible that a war cult founded by a
lecherous pedophile who married the six year old daughter of his best
friend and consummated the marriage three years later, arranged the
divorce of his daughter in law to add her to his harem and had his
critics murdered can be respected.  For documentation of the fatal
facts, see:  http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the

. Who can respect a demon who rubbed one of Adam’s shoulders
to produce a group of people for the fire and his other shoulder to
produce a group of people for Paradise?  Who can respect a demon
who demands “great slaughter” as the price of admission to his Celestial Bordello?

seek to impose

Islam seeks to impose itself by force upon the
entire world.  I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers to:

https://snooper.wordpress.com/whats-wrong-with-islam-muslims/
.  In the present instance, Islam seeks to impose its blasphemy
laws on us.

Islamophobia

Phobia implies irrational fear of something
harmless.  In the last 1389 years, Islam has caused the untimely deaths of an estimated 270*106
people.  If we object to the denial of our dignity and rights, we are labeled
Islamophobes. If we object to having perpetual war declared upon us, we are labeled
Islamophobes.

incitement to hatred

Hypocriticdal G’d’d AssWhole!!!
Demand action to criminalize incitement to hatred, propaganda for war
and genocide.  Have you heard about ICERD, I?CCPR &
CPPCG?  The canonical texts of Islam are egregiously in violation
of each of those international human rights covenants. I
disrespectfully demand their immediate enforcement against
Islam!!!  http://islamexposed.blogspot.com/2010/09/international-quran-petition.html

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/outlaw-islam/

peace & security

Peace is threatened by Islam, not by criticism and
condemnation of Islam.  Shari’ah flatly declares that the caliph
makes war
on Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians and fights all
other
peoples until they become Muslims.  It also says that war must be
carried out at all times by some party of the Muslims
and that
infidels
may be attacked without provocation.

When Muslims and their dhimmis assert that
Islamophobia: criticism of Moe, Allah, Islam and burning the
Qur’an  threaten world peace, they are making a threat, which
should be recognized as such.

organized campaign

I wish one existed, but it does not.  Hundreds
of bloggers, writers and videographers are acting independently to
expose the evil core of Islam.

 protect the world

Protect the world from instability & hatred by
making Islam extinct. Document the reality of Moe’s life and actions in
a full length feature film and give it global distribution.  Wise
Muslims up to the fact that they have been defrauded or coerced into
enslavement to Satan.  Induce mass apostasy!

free expression

    If the freedom of speech is taken away then
dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.
http://www.georgewashingtonsociety.org/Mission.html

When threatened and attacked we must be free to sound a
warning and accurately describe the source of the threat.  Islam’s definition of slander is anything disliked
by the subject, including comments on his religion. All negative statements about Moe, Allah and their
damned war cult are proscribed with the death penalty under Shari’ah.

Previous UN resolutions combating defamation
of Islam condemned and demanded criminalization of associating
terrorism with Islam. Guess why.  I will show you, nobody else
will.  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
33:26,27,
47:4,49:15,
59:2,13,
61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

This is what they are bitching about. Is it true? You be the judge;
render your decision after examining the evidence.

September 27, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Innocence of Muslims Update: High Commissioner for Human Rights


Rupert Colville, Spokesman for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights

09/21/’12

Due to poor auditory accuity and worse typing
skills, this transcript is somewhat imperfect, but I managed to make
out the important points in the screed.

Both the film and the czrtoons are
malicious and deliberately provocative. The film  particularly
portrays a disgracefully distorted image of Muslims and the High
Clmmissioner has stated clearly she understands why people would want
to protest strongly against the film but obviously the cartoons as well
and makes clear their right to do so, but peacefully .

And, nevertheless, we obviously absolutely condemn the killings in
Bengazi and the killings that have taken place since then we understand
around thirty people have now died liniked to the film in particular
and there’s no possible justification for the violence and destructive
reactions.  We urge religious and political leaders to make a
major effort to restore calm and we welcome the fact that very senior
Muslim figures have been saying similar things about …writing about
these provocations–stupid provocations.

I am not going to post the Charlie Hebdo cartoons,
but I have posted a link to Bare Naked Islam,
where you can see them in all their peurility. The sub sophomoric
cartoons seem to be takeoffs on the video: “Innocence of Muslims”and
Muslim reaction to it.  Here is the video for those who have not
yet viewed it or need a refresher.

malicious and provocative

Of course they are provocative, they are intended to
provoke thought and inquiry.  And people are inquiring about
whether or not the video reflects reality or fiction. The lucky ones
are viewing my blog post which documents the conceptual content
of the video.  Dr. Ali Sina has written that it is necessary to
insult Muslims to get their attention.  I agree with him.  In
my opinion, the video, while provocative, is not malicious.  Hebdo
seems to be pushing his pen over the line. I perceive that the French
cartoonist  shares the attitude of Pat Condell and raises it to a
new order of magnitude.

They wound up Pat real tight, didn’t they! Of course he is factually
and logically right.

distorted image

The video does not portray Muslims in general, it
portrays Moe and his companions.  The portrayal of Moe is
accurate: he was insane, suicidal, a lecherous pedophile, barbarian
warlord and false prophet.  Ample documentation of the fatal facts
is provided here:  http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the

Because Islam is what Moe said and did, the video
also portrays Islam accurately.  It is pure, unmitigated evil: a
continuing crime against humanity– predation.  When Moe declares
that infidels are to be killed, their widows raped, orphans enslaved
and property seized, he is describing the central mission of
Islam.

original religion

What is the “original religion
of Islam?  What is the economic system of Islam?  I will let
Moe answer those questions because he was the expert.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah
transaction, hold the tails
of oxen, are pleased
with agricultur
e, and give up
conducting jihad
(struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over
you,
and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

income

How did Moe get his income?  The Qur’an &
hadith have clues for you.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that
he should have prisoners of war
(and free them with ransom) until he had made
a great slaughter
(among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world
(i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires
(for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

 

Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 37, Number 495:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

Whenever a dead man in debt was brought to Allah’s
Apostle he would ask, “Has he left anything to repay his debt?” If he
was informed that he had left something to repay his debts, he would
offer his funeral prayer, otherwise he would tell the Muslims to offer
their friend’s funeral prayer. When
Allah made the Prophet wealthy through conquests
, he said, “I am
more rightful than other believers to be the guardian of the believers,
so if a Muslim dies while in debt, I am responsible for the repayment
of his debt, and whoever leaves wealth (after his death) it will belong
to his heirs. “

 

Bukhari  Ch 61 # 2756: …It is mentioned
from Ibn ‘Umar from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, “My provision has been
placed under the shadow of my spear
, and abasement and humility
have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.

This is a blog post, not a college course.  If
you want more detail, read these related blog posts:

provocations

Muslims do not require provocation to attack
infidels.  Islam considers infidels to be rebels against Allah who deserve to be
killed.  Reliance of the Traveller, O9.1 describes the
communal obligation to mount a minimum of one military expedition
against innocent infidels in every year.  Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, page 141 is explicit.

The destruction of the
sword  is
incurred by infidels
, although
they be not the first aggressors
, as
appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
generally received this effect.

infidelity

Infidelity means not being Muslim; a status offense
carying the death penalty.  Infidels are to be destroyed as per
the quote from Hedaya shown above.  Moe’s need for income caused
him to compromise, substituting extortion or destruction in the case of
Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians. For the disgusting details, begin
reading at page  213.

free expression

The first amendment was created because, in a
representative republic, freedom to criticize the government and it
policies is necessary to maintenance of liberty. Likewise, we must be
free to identify, accurately describe and warn against sources of
impending danger.  Thomas Jefferson bought a ‘Qur’an to learn the
doctrines of his enemy before fighting the Barbary Wars.  Since
the Accursed Abomination, we need to be able to accurately describe,
criticize and raise the alarm against Islam, whose damnable doctrines
motivated the murderers who perpetrated the attack.

The Fort Hood Massacre happened precicely because
the government turned an eye blinded by political correctness away from
the curseworthy belief system of Maj. Nidal Malik Hassan.  Now
they are preventing our officer corps from receiving accurate training
about enemy doctrine.  George Washington said it best.

If
the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led,
like sheep to the slaughter.
 

George
Washington
 

Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/g/georgewash146824.html#PgudjFI7U3HylJVU.99

 

September 22, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization


The Draft Resolution
“Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of,
and discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against,
persons based on religion or belief” contains only minor changes,
essentially maintaining the malignant malarkey of HRC 16/18 
passed last year.

Now that the draft has been submitted and posted to
the web, you can expect to see and hear more assertions of
victory.  The self-appointed experts will tell us that the
“defamation of religions’ meme has been abandoned; proved by the boiler
plate paragraphs carried over from last year’s resolutions.

The draft will be discussed and probably adopted by
consensus  Tuesday March 20, 2012.  There is nothing we can
do to stop it. The good news is that the resolution has no enforcement
mechanism, its only effect is adding false moral support to Islam’s
victim card narrative and its persecution of indigenous
minorities.

The draft was submitted by Pakistan on behalf of the
OIC; its initiative is Islamic.

free expression

   Reaffirming the positive
role that the exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and


expression and the full
respect for the freedom to seek, receive and
impart information


can play in strengthening
democracy and combating religious intolerance,

Am I the only one who perceives the inversion of
fact and fantasy?  Freedom of opinion & expression is the
central target of the resolution.  They demand that we tolerate
the intolerable: perpetuation, propagation & promotion of the
concept of divine mandate to conquer and subjugate the entire world
through deception, aggressive wars
of conquest
and terrorism.  Islam asserts a divine mandate to
kill
us
; rape & enslave our widows and orphans while seizing
our real & personal property
.

The strategic objective of the resolution is the
enactment & enforcement of national & international legislation
criminalizing all criticism of Islam.  When I write “Muhammad was
a terrorist.”, which is substantiated ty Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220,
I mention something impermissible and should be killed according to
Islamic law.  They want that law enforced! That is the purpose of
the draft resolution.

defamation

While the defamation meme is implicit rather than
explicit in this resolution, the Draft Resolution on “Freedom of religion or belief
contains, in the seventh paragraph on its second page, an important
clue to reality.  Do not overlook this clue!

Emphasizes that no religion should be
equated with terrorism
, as this may have


adverse consequences on the
enjoyment of the right to freedom of religion or belief of all


members of the religious
community concerned;

freedom to terrorize

Allah said that he would cast terror: 3:151
& 8:12.
Allah
said that he cast terror: 33:26,
59:2.
Moe said that he was made
victorious with terror: Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  Muslims are commanded to obey
Allah
and emulate
Moe
.  If Islam is equated with terrorism, then it must be
prohibited by law.

Islam is an inseverable package deal: all or
nothing, specified in 2:85.
Believers fight in Allah’s cause, killing and being killed specified
in  9:111.
Believers who take any
step to injure or enrage disbelievers
get extra credit for an
upgrade to their seat in Allah’s Celestial Bordello.

My right to freedom of opinion & expression; to
state the fact that terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam, must
be subordinated to the Muslims’ right to engage in terrorism.

intolerance

Islam imposes the death penalty for apostasy,
including reviling Allah, Moe or Islam.  The penalty is explicitly
stated in Reliance of the Traveller O8.1; the list of
apostatizing acts in O8.7 tells us what is impermissible to
mention.  The rule is extended to dhimmis (conquered Jews &
Christians) in O11.10.  Islam does not tolerate criticism of
Moe & Allah.  Moe had critics murdered.

The OIC is demanding, through the agency of the
Human Rights Council, that we be exhorted and compelled to tolerate a
war cult, disguised as a religion, which perpetuates genocidal
conquest.

Expresses deep concem at the
continued serious instances of derogatory stereotyping,


negative profiling and
stigmatization of persons based on their religion or belief,


as well as programmes and
agendas pursued by extremist organizations and


groups aimed at creating and
perpetuating negative stereotypes about religious


groups, in particular when
condoned by Governments;

derogatory stereotyping

Muslims
are genocidally violent
” has meaning as a derogatory stereotype
precisely because Islam
is genocidally violent

(alleged defamation) and Muslims are adherents to Islam.  History
shows us that the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides were
perpetrated by Muslims, on orders of the caliph.  The defamation
meme is malignantly false, ostensibly eliminated yet deeply embedded in
the resolution.  That which is intrinsically infamous can not be
defamed.

programmes and agendas

What they have in mind is the Dutch, Swiss &
Austrian freedom parties and “Islamophobic” comments and campaign
advertisements by American politicians.

Expresses its concern that
incidents of religious intolerance, discrimination and


related violence, as well as
of negative stereotyping of individuals on the basis of


religion or belief, continue
to rise around the world, and condemns, in this


context, any advocacy of
religious hatred against individuals that constitutes


incitement to discrimination,
hostility or violence, and urges States to take


effective measures, as set
forth in the present resolution, consistent with their


obligations under
international human rights law, to address and combat such


incidents;

incidents

The reference is to Fitna, the 15 minute documentary
by Geert Wilders, the Motoons,
International Burn the Koran Day & International Judge the Koran
Day.   If it is critical of Islam and receives high profile
public attention, it is an incident, according to the OIC.

advocacy & incitement

Words have meanings, but the standard meanings do
not apply when Muslims utter them.  Spoken by Muslims and their
dhimmis, words mean what Muslims want them to mean, not what we expect
them to mean.  Exposing Islam’s advocacy of hatred and incitement
to genocidal violence is, in their double speak, advocacy &
incitement.   Nothing illustrates that fact better than this
Mooning.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for
hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The
right of free expression is not at stake here.”

 

Adopting measures to criminalize
incitement to imminent violence based on


religion or belief;

measures to criminalize

Anyone not suffering from cranial-rectal
juxtaposition should recognize that as a demand to outlaw Fitna, the
Motoons and every expression critical of Islam.

March 19, 2012 Posted by | Freedom Of Speech, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Judicial Hypocrisy in India: Critical Update


Update!! New information has been discovered which  I was not able to  find at the time of the original publication of this article.

BNET ran a Times of India article dated April 17, ’10, which reports that India’s Supreme Court ruled in favor of banning a book titled “Islam A Concept of Political World Invasion by Muslims”.

Upon further research, I found that the article heralds the finalization of a ruling issued earlier this year. I also discovered two  resources which should prove to be of inestimable value in the search for truth.

Particular complaint was made, illegally, according to Sundaram,  of the author’s  quotes from the Qur’an and his interpretation of their meaning.  The court appointed a special master to translate the Qur’an for them.  I found that chapter 7 contains a quote of 9:29 which, while imperfect, transmits the essential meaning of the verse without distortion. Chapter  15 contains additional quotes.

After examining the second listed chapter, I find that the quotes are sufficiently full and accurate to convey their meaning. I also find this among the concluding paragraphs. It speaks directly to the issue involved in the ban.

Whereas there are yet many more Ayats that go on to speak against the non-believers in Islam. India having declared itself a secular country believes also in guarding the religious feelings of the minority communities, The Constitution of India and many laws made thereunder are specially enacted to keep the internal atmosphere within the country free of communal tensions. 1 have therefore laboured to keep away many of of the positively provocative Ayats to which all Muslims must owe their allegiance. Hence, while it is possible to add to the above number of 16 Ayats, material declared in Quaran as binding to the Muslims yet it may not be conducive for a non-Muslim writing this book to state more than what 1 have done. Indeed, It is possible for many critics to draw my own chosen path not to have included them in this publication for the reason that such further inclusion could cause bitterness in the society comprising of Hindus and Muslims living in India.

I find in  chapter 16 that 18:22 is mis-cited. Other than that, the quotes are reasonably accurate. I find further that my guess that the author was influenced by the Calcutta Qur’an Petition appears to be vindicated. I  presume that the book was written in another language and translated into English.

I can not dispute  such of the author’s conclusions as I have encountered in my brief survey of a few chapters. I am more convinced  that the book was banned unjustly; the ban should have been reversed on appeal.

The rough translation and selection of background and foreground colors make the book difficult to read.  In my opinion, it is well worth reading and ought to receive a wide audience.
————————-

DNA reports that the Bombay High Court upheld a state  ban on the publication of  Islam — A concept of Political World Invasion by RV Bhasin.

Freedom of expression granted by the Constitution, the bench said, should not be used to trigger “senseless destruction of lives and property and breach of public order”.

If a book describing Islamic doctrines and practices is judged to trigger violence, then what about the Qur’an, which  sanctifies and mandates genocidal terrorism?  The Calcutta Qur’an Petition was arbitrarily dismissed,. yet this case upholds this book banning.  Which is worse, a book which  perpetuates an order to engage in aggressive warfare or a book which describes its effects?  It is obvious that the wrong book was banned.

April 21, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , | Leave a comment

Judicial Hypocrisy in India


DNA reports that the Bombay High Court upheld a state  ban on the publication of  Islam — A concept of Political World Invasion by RV Bhasin.

Freedom of expression granted by the Constitution, the bench said, should not be used to trigger “senseless destruction of lives and property and breach of public order”.

If a book describing Islamic doctrines and practices is judged to trigger violence, then what about the Qur’an, which  sanctifies and mandates genocidal terrorism?  The Calcutta Qur’an Petition was arbitrarily dismissed,. yet this case upholds this book banning.  Which is worse, a book which  perpetuates an order to engage in aggressive warfare or a book which describes its effects?  It is obvious that the wrong book was banned.

January 24, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , | Leave a comment

Ad Hoc Cmte: Non-Paper


On December 5, 2008, there was issued, on the letterhead of the High Commissioner For Human Rights, by Ambassador Idriss Jazairy, President of the Ad Hoc Committee on Complementary Standards, a “Non-Paper Paper” and a cover letter explaining its purpose. [Emphasis & links added.]
[Due to the use of OCR to extract quotes from scanned document images, there will be some spelling errors and a few Anglicized words will be Americanized. ]

The purpose of this “Non paper” is to stimulate a constructive debate on the content and the framework of major areas of vulnerability which for reasons of substance and/or of procedure suffer from protection gaps. Some of these areas are related to the contemporary manifestations of racism, ~ racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.The purpose of this “Non-paper” is also to invite concrete responses and recommendations based on its content.

The Ambassador set forth the Non Paper’s terms of reference.

  • Paragraph 199 of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action that recommended to the Commission on Human Rights, now replaced by the Human Rights Council, to elaborate complementary intenational standards aimed at strengthening and updating international instruments against all forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.
  • Decision 3/IO3 of the Human Rights Council that decides, in pursuance of decision and instruction of the 2001 World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance to establish an Ad Hoc Committee of the Human Rights Council with the mandate to elaborate, as a matter of priority and necessity, complementary standards in the form of either a convention or additional protocol (s) to the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racism, racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and related Intolerance that will ill the existing gaps in the Convention and also provide new normative texts aimed at combating all forms of contemporary racism, including incitement to racial and religious hatred.
  • Resolution 6/21 of the Human Rights Council on the elaboration of new international complementary standards to the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.

The following listed phrases are critical because they are encoded to conceal the true intentions of the committee.

  • all forms of racism
  • related intolerance
  • incitement to racial and religious hatred

We must always bear in mind how the United Nations twist the English language!!! The following quote is from Preliminary document of the African Regional Conference Preparatory to the Durban Review Conference [Emphasis added.]

4. Emphasizes the urgent need to address the scourges of anti-Semitism, Christianophobia, and Islamophobia as contemporary forms of racism as well as racial and violent movements based on racism and discriminatory ideas directed at African, Arab, Christian, Jewish, Muslim and other communities;

Islamophobia = racism!!!

The Ambassador directed the member states to keep in mind::

all views expressed and contributions made within the framework of the follow-up mechanisms of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, including:

  • The survey of the five experts on the nature and the scope of substantive gaps, with regard to issues of content in the existing international instruments to combat racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance (A/HRC/4/W G.3/ 6) ;
  • The document of the Committee on the Elimination of racial discrimination on possible measures to strengthen the implementation of the final observations by adopting new recommendations by updating its monitoring procedures (All-IRC/4/WG.3/7)
  • The responses provided by the Committee ou the Elimination of racial discrimination to the questionnaire by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights pursuant to decision PC.1/ 10 of the Preparatory Committee of the Durban Review Conference (A/CON’F.2l1/PC.2/CRP.5) including the relevant points of view made by the Members ofthe Committee on behalf ofthe latter; ~
  • The Report of the 5th session of the Intergovernmental Working Group on the Effective implementation of the Durban Conference and Prcgrarnmc of Action (A/HCR/6/10) and all relevant recommendations and conclusions adopted by this Group since its creation, particularly those contained in document(AH.CR/AC.!/I/CRP.2);
  • The discussions that took place during the first session of the Ad hoc Committee on complementary standards, held from 18 to 2l February 2008.

The Ambassador lists the following revelations from the two previous sessions.

  • There is global collective agreement and commitment expressed during the 2001 World Conference against racism on the principle of claborating international complementary standards to strengthen and update the international instruments against all forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance (para 199 of the Durban Programme of Action);
  • However, no consensus was reached on how the specific form of/manner of giving concrete expression to this commiuncnt in priciple;
  • We must also bear in mind the ensuing debate on the links between articles 19 and 20 of the International Covenant on civil and political rights and the expert meeting of 2 and 3 October 2008, whereafter it was reiterated that the fundamental right of freedom of expression is compatible with the prohibition of any call for national, racial or religious hatred which constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility and violence;
  • It is thus imperative to reach the largest possible agreement, through the Ad hoc Committee on complementary standards, on concrete ways and means to implement the commitment in principle made: during the 2001 World Conference against racism.
  • The approach suggested to achieve this goal is to stimulate, in a positive and inclusive spirit, concrete proposals on the fields and themes laid out in the “Non paper” for which complementary standardized provisions or other measures designed to fill protection gaps, are necessary.

Of course, the revelations repeat certain code phrases.

  • all forms of racism
  • related intolerance

Next, we encounter a reference to ICCPR.

  • the fundamental right of freedom of expression is compatible with the prohibition of any call for national, racial or religious hatred which constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility and violence

Muslims, liars, lawyers & U.N. bureaucrats do not use words the way normal people do. “call for national, racial or religious hatred which constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility and violence” means any criticism of Islam, specifically the Danish Cartoons & Fitna. In this context, it is asserted that censorship of criticism of Islam does not interfere with freedom of expression.

The Non-Paper begins with a listing of its Purpose, scope and parameters:

  • Implementing paragraph 199 of the Programme of Action of the World Conference against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, in which the Conference “Rec0Recommends that the Commission on Human Rights prepare complementary international standards
  • to strengthen and update international instruments against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance in all their aspects”, as well as the relevant Human Rights Council resolutions, in particular decision 3/103 .
  • The need to enhance efforts to counter contemporary and emerging forms of manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.
  • The need to strengthen the monitoring procedures of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination with a view to enable it to undertake the responsibilities entrusted to it in a more effective manner.
  • The need to address double or multiple discrimination a continuing source of concern, as it affects certain individuals and groups, in particular gender-related racial discrimination and double discrimination on the grounds of race and religion.
  • The imperative to ensure that measures to combat terrorism respect the fundamental principles and the universally recognized standards of international law, international human rights law and international humanitarian Law.
  • The urgency of addressing racial profiling and eliminating it as a pervasive form of discrimination.
  • The need for uniform and consistent application of the law at the national and international levels to ensure the effectiveness of international efforts to counter racism and racial discrimination.
  • The need to recognize that The prohibition of the dissemination of all ideas based upon racial superiority or hatred and the prohibition of incitement to national, racial -· or religious hatred are compatible with the freedom of opinion and expression.
  • The principle of regarding provocative portrayals of objects of religious veneration as a malicious violation of the spirit of tolerance which must also be a feature of democratic society.
  • The need to re-emphasize that the prohibition of publication of material with the aim of protecting the rights of others and against seriously or gratuitously offensive attacks on matters regarded as sacred by the followers of any religion is a legitimate State objective.
  • The need for national and international law to provide adequate legal responses to propaganda of a racist and xenophobia nature committed through computer systems.
  • The need to follow the growing trend in many States to include, in their criminal I legislation, offenses in which religious motives are an aggravating factor.

Once again, the code phrases rear their ugly heads.

  • related intolerance = Islamophobia = any criticism of Islam.
  • contemporary and emerging forms of manifestations of racism = Islamophobia = any criticism of Islam.
  • measures to combat terrorism respect the fundamental principles and the universally recognized standards of intemational law, international human rights law and international humanitarian Law. This is a direct attack on surveillance of young Muslim males, such as the “magnificent 19” and other perpetrators of mass casualty attacks. Suspicion of Muslims = “racial profiling”:.
  • racial profiling
  • The need to recognize that The prohibition of the dissemination of all ideas based upon racial superiority or hatred and the prohibition of incitement to national, racial -· or religious hatred are compatible with the freedom of opinion and expression. A repetition of the egregious attack upon free speech. The reference is to the Danish Cartoons and Fitna.
  • provocative portrayals of objects of religious veneration as a malicious violation of the spirit of tolerance This is another reference to the Danish Cartoons.
  • The need to re-emphasize that the prohibition of publication of material with the aim of protecting the rights of others and against seriously or gratuitously offensive attacks on matters regarded as sacred by the followers of any religion is a legitimate State objective. Refer to the quotes from Reliance of the Traveller in the initial post of this series.
  • propaganda of a racist and xenophobia nature committed through computer systems. This is an attack upon blog posts and web sites which expose Islam’s damnable doctrines.

Eight specific themes are listed, here is #3.

3- Terrorism, racial discrimination and racial profiling:

  1. A definition of racial profiling, prioritizing human rights protection, could be elaborated and agreed upon.
  2. States must ensure that measures to combat terrorism do not discriminate, in purpose or effect on ·grounds of race, colour, descent or national or ethnic origin, as well as on religious grounds, bearing in mind in this context the intersectionality between racial and religious discrimination.
  3. Profiling based on stereotypes founded on grounds of discrimination prohibited by international law, including on racial, ethnic and/or religious grounds must be prohibited by law.

Who practices terrorism? Are the majority of terror attacks perpetrated by little old ladies from Iceland? Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam, established as such by 3:151, 8:12., 8:60, 33:26, 59:2 & 59:13. When you hear hoof beats, they probably come from horses, not from unicorns. Profiling according to current trends in the identity of perpetrators is common sense. Islam is acting through the UN to disarm us.

The fifth listed theme gets down to detail.

5- Incitement to racial, national and religious hatred

  1. There is a need for further clarifying and reinforcing at the international level existing obligations on the eradication of all incitement to hatred and ‘ discrimination in any form and to prohibit by law, propaganda for war and advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence.
  2. In this context, complementary standards to be developed should observe the following parameters:
    • Article 4 of ICERD shall be extended to the crime of incitement to racial hatred covering offenses motivated by religious hatred against immigrant communities.
    • The protection provided shall extend to all individuals and groups within the jurisdiction of the State Party.
    • The prohibitions shall equally cover acts committed by any individual, group or organization, including political and media organizations as well as by national or local public authorities.
    • The provisions shall apply to any act which, in purpose or effect, incites discrimination, hostility or violence.
    • In order to achieve consistent and uniform application and maximize protection for actual or potential victims, any doubt as to the existence of a causal link between an act of incitement and the likelihood of a violation, or the threshold required for reaching such a determination, shall be interpreted in a consistent and coherent manner at the national and international levels so as to ensure appropriate protection of the concerned individuals or groups.
    • Addressing acts constituting incitement shall apply whether such acts have aims which are internal or external to the State concerned.
    • Requisite standards would explicitly not prohibit advocacy of the sovereign right to self-defence or the right of peoples to self-determination and independence in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
    • Requisite complementary standards shall include the prohibition of publication of material that direct seriously offensive attacks on matters regarded by followers of any religion or belief as sacred or inherent to their dignity as human beings, with the aim of protecting them against such attacks.
  3. In line with the above parameters, States’ general obligations would include:
    • Undertaking to promulgate, where they do not exist, a specific legislation prohibiting any propaganda for war and any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence.
    • Asserting, in the relevant specific legislation, that such propaganda and advocacy are contrary to public policy.
    • Providing for appropriate sanction, including of a criminal nature, in case of violation.

The listed item under sub section c would appear to be straightforward. It is not. Muslims, liars, lawyers and U.N. Bureaucrats do not use the English language to communicate, they use it to deceive! In evidence whereof I cite the egregious remarks of the Secretary General on the subject of Fitna, the short documentary by Girt Wielders.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

Fitna does not incite violence, it documents incitement contained in the Qur’an and propagated by Imams in their Mosques

The program of the Ad Hoc Committee runs parallel to the programs of the General Assembly and Human Rights Council in their resolutions combating “defamation of religion” and that of the Durban II review conference. Those programs are documented in detail and their egregious hypocrisy exposed and documented in the following listed blog posts..

Other posts in this series:

August 4, 2009 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , , | 5 Comments

   

%d bloggers like this: