Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Kagan: HELL NO!!!


I just read  Can Kagan Be Trusted to Defend the Constitution? in which   Ross Kaminsky  assembles the critical pieces of the nominee’s attitude toward the First Amendment’s free speech clause. I want you to follow that link to Human Events

Kaminsky points out how Kagan’s arguments in important cases before  the  Supreme Court indicate an unacceptable lack of respect for the right of free expression.  Crucial quotes from a paper she wrote amplify that concern. I am glad that Kaminsky posted a link to the paper, because I clicked it and saw its title. “Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine”  Since when do the ends justify the means?   This quote was found on page 55 of the paper.

The realm of public expression may have too much of some kinds of speech, too little of others; some speakers may drown out or dominate their opposite numbers. Self-conscious redistribution of expressive opportunities seems the most direct way of correcting these defects and achieving the appropriate range and balance of viewpoint.

President Obama spoke to the graduates  at Hampton University, giving us some clues.

And meanwhile, you’re coming of age in a 24/7 media environment that bombards us with all kinds of content and exposes us to all kinds of arguments, some of which don’t always rank that high on the truth meter.  And with iPods and iPads; and Xboxes and PlayStations — none of which I know how to work — (laughter) — information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment, rather than a tool of empowerment, rather than the means of emancipation.  So all of this is not only putting pressure on you; it’s putting new pressure on our country and on our democracy.

Perhaps outlining some crucial points will make things clear for you.

  • bombards us
    • all kinds of content
  • exposes us
    • all kinds of arguments
      • don’t always rank that high on the truth meter
  • information becomes a distraction
  • putting new pressure on our country and on our democracy

That is dictator speak for “I need  new laws to squelch my critics who are hampering my efforts to enslave you and cement my party in power.”  What is the relevance to Kagan’s screed?  Another outline is in order.

  • too much of some kinds of speech
  • drown out or dominate
  • redistribution of expressive opportunities
    • correcting these defects
      • appropriate
        • viewpoint.
          • range
          • balance

What do they have in common?  Arrogance!!  That single characteristic sticks out like a sore thumb.  We are bombarded with all kinds of arguments, which may be untrue, and become a distraction, putting pressure on our democracy.  There  is too much of some speech, drowning out and dominating others. The remedy is redistribution of expressive opportunities assuring appropriate range and balance of viewpoint.

The President and his latest nominee to the Supreme Court are two  nuts in a Socialist shell who seek legislation to  criminalize criticism of their policies.  That is exactly what the First Amendment is intended to prevent.

Those two nuts are not alone in that Socialist shell, they share it with Mark Lloyd,  Obama’s appointee to the FCC.  Three years ago, he co-authored
The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio“.  That screed asserts that there is too much Conservative speech on talk radio and suggests public policy changes to reduce Conservative speech, supplanting it with Socialist speech.

We are facing authoritarian demagogues who seek to overthrow our representative republic, replacing it with an autocracy.  First, they must silence the guard dogs.

There are not enough  Republicans in the Senate to block this nomination.  Worse yet, they lack the resolve required, they are caving in.  We have no recourse except to rise up and raise Hell.  We must send a clear message to our Senators: Kagan is not fit to sit on the court: your vote for this nomination guarantees my vote against you in the next election cycle.  Reverence for the rights enshrined in the Constitution is the most important qualification for a Supreme Court Justice; Kagan lacks it.

http://www.congress.org/ has a form you can use to send an email to your Senators. It is free and easy. I urge you to use it immediately.

May 19, 2010 Posted by | Fairness Doctrine, Uncategorized | , , | Leave a comment

Idiotic Petition Comments


I recently visited the Ban Islam Petition and discovered two interesting new comments. The petition asks the World Court to outlaw Islam because of its intrinsically evil doctrines & practices.

787.    Morgan Brykein    Care to read the First Amendment?

The petition’s author is a  citizen of Canada, not shaded by the First Amendment’s umbrella of protection. The Canadian Human Rights Council has the power to persecute him. The amendment’s establishment & free exercise clauses  apply to the federal government of the U.S.A., they have no application to the World Court.

786.    Frikka Wow Wow    Freedom of religion, crackers, ever hear of it?

Casting aside the racial slur as irrelevant, I’ll tackle the freedom of religion argument. Those persons fortunate enough to be under the First Amendment’s umbrella of protection are shielded from establishment of a national church and protected from national interference with their faith & practice. Freedom of religion implies that we can’t be compelled to believe or worship nor be obstructed from belief & practice.

Islam has no such provision. 3:85 declares that no religion will be accepted but Islam and those who seek other religions will be condemned to Hellfire. 8:39 & 9:29 declare unremitting warfare against  pagans and Jews & Christians respectively until all resistance ceases, only Allah is worshiped and “people of the book” are humbled, subjugated & extorted. In Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387, Moe informs us that our lives & property are not sacred to Muslims until we become Muslims.

If Muslims are free to practice Islam, then the rest of us are deprived of the right to live in addition to our freedom of religion.  Open your Qur’an to 2:216, which ordains Jihad for Muslims. Jihad is what a Muslim must do to avoid Hellfire and be assured of admission to Paradise. Open your Qur’an to 61:10 and read through the 13th ayeh. Muslims are obligated to fight in Allah’s cause. Allah’s cause is making his word and system dominate the entire world. Doubters & dissenters should turn to 9:33 followed by Sahih Bukhari 4.52.65. Offensive Jihad is  fard Kifaya, binding on every able bodied male Muslim of military age until a sufficient number have answered the call. Defensive Jihad is fard Ayn, binding on every Muslim who can get to the front.

June 26, 2009 Posted by | Petitions, Religion of Peace | , , | Leave a comment

   

%d bloggers like this: