Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

United Nations & Islam–Genocide Incorporated


The General Assembly uttered and published A/66/153 (Part I), titled: Establishment of a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the region
of the Middle East.

After an introduction and observations consisting of six paragraphs, the document concludes with responses from several states. Three of those are important. I will return to the observations after commenting on these.

Cuba exposes the top level issue:

The acquisition of nuclear capability by  Israel represents  a threat to the
security of the neighbouring States and to peace in the region, which is already in
turmoil. The statements made by the Israeli Prime Minister on 12 December 2006,
admitting that Israel is a nuclear-weapon State, are a source of great concern.

The focus of the U.N. campaign for a nuclear free Mid East is on Israel.  Only Japan mentioned Iran’s nuclear weapons program.  Its not what you do, its who you are and who your allies are.

Egypt piles on:

The main impediment to establishing a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the
Middle East has been Israel. Egypt notes with grave concern that Israel remains the
sole country in the Middle East not to  adhere to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation
Treaty.

If Israel had not bombed Iraq’s reactor, would they be bitching about Saddam’s nuclear weapons program?  They are gravely concerned that only Israel has nukes. Once Iran obtains them, their concern will fade away.

Syria piles on:

The Syrian Arab Republic expresses its grave concern that Israel’s refusal to
accede to the Treaty, despite numerous calls and international resolutions urging it
to do so, remains the fundamental obstacle to ridding the Middle East of nuclear
weapons.

Iran signed the treaty and violates it with impunity; nobody gives a damn about that. Its all about Israel. Then there is the little matter of the a reactor project in which North Korea and Syria were partners. Only Israel was concerned about that reactor and bombed it.  Syria has not permitted effective analysis of the site.

Pandora’s box is open. The lid is off, the demons are loose; they can not be returned to the box. Hitler’s regime was working on the A bomb. The scientists who worked on it came over to our side, resulting in an early end to the war in the Pacific, saving millions of lives.

Communists who infiltrated our government transmitted vital information to Russia and now the demons are loose.  No treaty is worth the paper it is printed on. Tyrants Hellbent on expanding their empires to global scope will not adhere to treaties. They will not disarm. They can not be disarmed short of all out war.

Dreams of nuclear free zones and a nuclear free world are the ultimate insanity. Disarmament means that only those most inclined to aggression will have weapons.  It means that their victims will be unable to mount an effective defense. Disarmament is the predator’s fondest dream: a guarantee of easy prey.

Now is the time to expose and dissect the real agenda, which is exposed in ¶6 of the Observations.

6. The Secretary-General reaffirms the urgent need for a just and lasting solution
to the Arab-Israeli conflict. He believes that it is in the best interest of both parties
to achieve an end to the conflict, a resolution of all final status issues — including
Jerusalem, borders, refugees and security — and the emergence of a sovereign,
ndependent, contiguous and viable State of Palestine living side-by-side in peace
and security with Israel. He calls for the implementation of all relevant resolutions
of the Security Council, in particular resolutions 1850 (2008) and 1860 (2009). The
Secretary-General welcomes the efforts of the United States to facilitate political
progress between Israelis and Palestinians.  He appeals to the parties to return to
negotiations without preconditions and without delay and to discuss all core issues
with a view to a final resolution of the conflict. He will continue to work towards
that end with the Quartet. The Secretary-General emphasizes the importance of any
peace settlement to be comprehensive and reiterates the importance of the Arab
Peace Initiative in this regard. He calls upon all concerned parties within and
outside the region to adopt a constructive  attitude with a view to creating stable
security conditions and an eventual settlement that  would facilitate the process of
establishing a zone free of nuclear weapons in the Middle East. The SecretaryGeneral
reiterates the continued readiness of the United Nations to provide any
assistance deemed helpful in this regard.

 

The Litany of lies:

Arab-Israeli conflict

There is no conflict; there is an ongoing genocide. The 1400 year timescale makes this fact difficult to detect. Moe plagiarized Hebrew scripture and co-opted Hebrew prophets in hopes of attracting Jews to his new war cult. His ruse was detected and rejected, so Moe set out to punish the Jews for rejecting his lies.

  • Attack on B. Qaynuqa
  • Attack on B. Qurayza
  • Attack on B. al-Mustaliq
  • Expedition to Khaybar
  • The Affair of Fadak
  • Banu Nadir.

According to the Qur’an, Allah commanded Muslims to wage war against Jews. That imperative includes war against Christians & Zoroastrians; anyone with a scriptural religion. It is contained in Surah At-Taubah 29; read it and curse Islam.

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Does it really mean that?

“Allah commanded His Messenger to fight the People of the Scriptures, Jews and Christians, on the ninth year of Hijrah, and he prepared his army to fight the Romans and called the people to Jihad announcing his intent and destination. The Messenger sent his intent to various Arab areas around Al-Madinah to gather forces, and he collected an army of thirty thousand.” [Tafsir Ibn Kathir]

Fight those who do not believe in God, nor in the Last Day, for, otherwise, they would have believed in the Prophet (s), and who do not forbid what God and His Messenger have forbidden, such as wine, nor do they practise the religion of truth, the firm one, the one that abrogated other religions, namely, the religion of Islam — from among of those who (min, ‘from’, explains [the previous] alladhīna, ‘those who’) have been given the Scripture, namely, the Jews and the Christians, until they pay the jizya tribute, the annual tax imposed them, readily (‘an yadin is a circumstantial qualifier, meaning, ‘compliantly’, or ‘by their own hands’, not delegating it [to others to pay]), being subdued, [being made] submissive and compliant to the authority of Islam. [Tafsir al-Jalalayn]

Moe confirmed it.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

It is codified in Shari’ah..

O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad
The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,
“Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29),…


Allah had something more to say, something very revealing: that he would always send someone to torment and humiliate the Jews. Who might he send?

7:167. And (remember) when your Lord declared that He would certainly keep on sending against them (i.e. the Jews), till the Day of Resurrection, those who would afflict them with a humiliating torment. Verily, your Lord is Quick in Retribution (for the disobedient, wicked) and certainly He is Oft­Forgiving, Most Merciful (for the obedient and those who beg Allâh’s Forgiveness).

In the end, he will send the Muslims, led by Jesus Christ. Nobody else will tell you about this; I will because I do not give a damn who is offended.

…”In the future, the Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary, will kill the Jews. This will occur just before the end of this world.”…[Tafsir Ibn Kathir]

Four more ahadith are relevant to this issue. The first of these is local to the Hijaz, but has global implications, which I have highlighted.  The first two display Moe’s intent as well as his arrogance. The third confirms genocidal intent: the gates of Paradise will not swing open until they kill the last Jew.  The fourth shows how caliph Umar followed up on the others.   Umar was one of the four “rightly guided caliphs”, the one who conquered Israel in 638.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 392:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

While we were in the Mosque, the Prophet came out and said, “Let us go to the Jews” We went out till we reached Bait-ul-Midras. He said to them, “If you embrace Islam, you will be safe.You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle, and I want to expel you from this land. So, if anyone amongst you owns some property, he is permitted to sell it, otherwise you should know that the Earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle.”

Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2477
Narrated Ibn Hawalah:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: It will turn out that you will be armed troops, one is Syria, one in the Yemen and one in Iraq. Ibn Hawalah said: Choose for me, Apostle of Allah, if I reach that time. He replied: Go to Syria, for it is Allah’s chosen land, to which his best servants will be gathered but if you are unwilling, go to your Yemen, and draw water from your tanks, for Allah has on my account taken special charge of Syria and its people.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 177:
Narrated Abu Huraira:

Allah’s Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. “O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.”

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 386:
Narrated Jubair bin Haiya:
‘Umar sent the Muslims to the great countries to fight the pagans. …  Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”

Ban Ki-moon, I call you out: are you an ignorant damned fool or a traitor to the human race?  Which of these fatal facts were you unaware of?  Which of these fatal facts do you not comprehend?  Muslims were commanded to conquer the entire world, including Israel. Muslims were promised that all land they conquered would always remain under their control.  Muslims can not tolerate the existence of Israel because it proves Allah to be an impotent idol whose threat and promise are void.  Islam’s urge to reconquer Israel can not end while there are living Muslims on the face of the earth. Do you still deny this fatal fact?  If so, then you are, indeed a traitor to the human race.

end to the conflict

There is no conflict; there is only the Islamic imperative of genocidal conquest which can not end while Muslims remain alive on the face of the earth.

resolution of all final status issues

There is only one issue: the existence of Israel.  While Israel exists, Muslims can never be satisfied. Nothing less than the total destruction of Israel and genocide of the Jews can satisfy Islam.

State of Palestine

Trans-Jordan: the state of Palestine. One is enough!!! Its creation consumed 70% of the mandate which was to be restored to the Jews as their homeland. Israel does not owe Falestinians any more land beyond mass graves.

side-by-side

They demand a state in place of, not beside Israel. Read the Charter of HAMAS and the PLO Charter.

negotiations

What is there to negotiate with an ideology which demands genocide and politicide?  What part of existential do you not comprehend?!

without preconditions

  • Jerusalem
  • borders
  • refugees
  • security
  • and the emergence of a State of Palestine
    • sovereign
    • independent
    • contiguous
    • viable

Am I the only one who can perceive the obvious hypocrisy?  First he lists the preconditions, then he denies them.  We are not dealing with an ignorant fool, we are dealing with an arrogant traitor who perceives us as too stupid and indolent to recognize objective factual reality.

final resolution

  •     Translation: “final solution”. Obvious meaning: genocide.
    • Moe
    • Hitler
    • Ban Ki-moon
  • Did someone once say “Never again!”? It sure was not Ban Ki -Moon.

Arab Peace Initiative

“First you surrender, then we negotiate.”  No preconditions, remember?

August 22, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , | Leave a comment

Calumny by Innuendo


One of my Facebook friends gave me a link to an article by Dan Gardner. The article, entitled The not so great Islamist menace and published on an Ottawa Citizen web site, is interesting because of the author’s attitude.

Subsequent to reading the article, I became involved in the reader discussion. While there are several interesting replies, I singled this one out because it deserves a thorough rebuttal which will not fit in the small space allocated by the web site’s comment system.

Ozy3

10:03 PM on January 5, 2011

People on this board have actually attacked Gardner for relying on hard facts, rather than promoting warped perceptions that they enjoy. They are angry because Gardner is undermining the luxurious and uncomplicated hatred they feel towards a group linked only by a religious belief. They don’t want to question that hatred or see the targets of their anger as human beings. One poster is even implying that Muslims don’t deserve sympathy because no matter what he or she may be like as an individual, the religious affiliation renders them unworthy of compassion.

This is the definition of dehumanizing. When Ann Coulter calls for carpet bombing Muslim countries and forcibly converting survivors to Christianity, she gets a standing ovation. But 65 years ago, that idea was called “The Final Solution”. How did we forget so quickly when we swore “Never Again”?

And these views being aired in Canada, of all places? What have we become?

Read more: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/great+Islamist+menace/4058778/story.html#ixzz1AFu2Spcj

hard facts

The opening paragraphs are full of attitude & perception, not hard facts. The last two sentences of the second paragraph stands out.

It’s Muslims. Or if you’re a little more careful with your language, it’s radical Muslims, or “Islamists.”

Sorry, Mr. Gardner, responsibility for Islamic terrorism is not the property of any of the three listed entities. Muslims are people who have recited the Shehada three times in Arabic and subsequently obey Allah and his Messenger or whose fathers did.  The other two entities are fallacies whose mention is a token of political correctness and factual error.

Responsibility for Islamic terrorism is the province of Islamic doctrine and the texts & clerics who propagate it.  The Qur’an sanctifies & mandates terrorism. The hadith & Sira exemplify it for Muslims to emulate.

One subsequent sentence stands out as an exemplar of arrogance in the guise of  ‘hard facts’.

“So the danger is big and growing, and Islamists are the source. Right?”

When  you cite one botched suicide bombing and a Mumbai style attack that was thwarted by good police work, and use them to stake a case that Islamic terror does not pose a real proximate and persistent threat of death and injury, you are not being serious, you are being flippant and arrogant. How many deaths and serious injuries would have resulted if the bomb had not detonated prematurely? Fortunately, we will never know, that blood was not splattered.  To assert that the toll would be insignificant to the victims and their families is the height of inhumane indifference.

The perpetrator and frustrated perpetrators had something in common: Islam, which commands them to participate in genocidal world conquest using terrorism as a battle tactic of asymmetrical warfare. Islam, not ‘Islamists’ is the ‘source’.

‘Islamists’ implies that normative Islam is apolitical, a personal religion. It is not. Islam is a continuing criminal enterprise founded for the personal emolument of its founder through the professional practice of piracy and extortion.

The founder of Islam became a warlord when he emigrated to Yathrib, which he took over and renamed Medina. He seized both ‘spiritual’ and temporal power. He made all the decisions in his theocracy. Let doubters & dissenters observe what he said in Allah’s name in 33:26.

Next we come to the abuse of statistics.

“The European Union’s Terrorism Situation and Trend Report 2010 states that in 2009 there were “294 failed, foiled, or successfully executed attacks” in six European countries. This was down almost one-third from the total in 2008 and down by almost one-half from the total in 2007.”

Two hundred ninety-four attacks were failed, foiled or executed, in a declining trend. What was the planned scale of those attacks? How many others were in the planning stages but not carried out?   Failed and foiled attacks render the threat negligible and of course the trend is irreversible. Tell that to those injured in the most recent failed attack.  Tell it to one of the victims seriously injured in Madrid or London.  Chortle about it to a father whose wife and child were killed at the school in Beslan.  Thank you very much for your vacuum headed assurances.

“As for who’s responsible, forget Islamists. The overwhelming majority of the attacks— 237 of 294 — were carried out by separatist groups, such as the Basque ETA. A further 40 terrorists schemes were pinned on leftist and/or anarchist terrorists. Rightists were responsible for four attacks. Single-issue groups were behind two attacks, while responsibility for a further 10 was not clear.”

How many people do the ETA and other splinter groups kill? How does that statistic compare to the number of victims maimed and killed by Muslim terrorists?   Its as if the attacks on London, Madrid and Beslan never happened because there were more, smaller attacks by others that failed or were thwarted.

They did it once, they promise to do it again. That is the stuff of terror, of induced paranoia that will eventually make civil society impossible. And it is all reduced to insignificance and dismissed by an irrelevant and reversible statistical trend.

warped perceptions

Here we have a thinly veiled ad hominem attack, totally devoid of substance; a prime exemplar of innuendo.

luxurious hatred

Critics of Islam are accused of bigotry because we object to the unholy consequences of damnable doctrines which impel men to the most barbarian acts of mass murder in the name of their demon who demands blood sacrifice: “great slaughter“.

religious belief

They believe that they have a divine mandate to conquer and subjugate the entire world; a divine license to kill us, rape our widows, enslave our children and seize our real and personal property for their own profit. We are supposed to respect & tolerate that belief and allow them to implement it. Yeah, right.

  • 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
  • 33:27.  And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.
    • “My judgement is that their fighters should be killed and their children and wealth should be seized.” [The Campaign against Banu Qurayzah]
    • Relevant Islamic law
      • Reliance of the Traveller
        • o9.0 jihad defined
        • o9.1 religious obligation thereof & Islamic initiative
        • o9.8 perpetual war on Jews & Christians
        • o9.13 captive women and children enslaved
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
    Narrated Anas bin Malik:
    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

targets of their anger

Here we have an exemplar of the victim card. Muslims are victims because we react with anger to their attacks upon us. Resistance is evil, we should surrender, submit and suffer enslavement instead.  Yeah, right.

religious affiliation renders them unworthy of compassion

The innuendo continues. LibTards can’t comprehend the intrinsic evil of Islam. The fact that most Muslims are victims of Islam changes nothing. They impose it on new victims.  There are two possible ways to break the cycle: emancipate them from slavery to Allah or kill them.

dehumanizing

Moe dehumanized his companions by enslaving them to Allah, for whom they fight, kill and are killed. LibTards can not comprehend the meaning of believers. The infliction of Islam is similar to a vampire bite, it dehumanizes its victims.

Ann Coulter

Ann’s excellent suggestion, expressed in hyperbole, has the ring of truth which LibTards can’t hear.  Because Allah promises victory and makes the Muslim’s eternal destiny dependent on participation in jihad,  When you believe that you will go to Hell if you don’t go to war, you go to war. Because of that doctrine, Islam can not be defeated, it must be eradicated, a fatal fact which LibTards can not comprehend.

“The Final Solution”

The innuendo continues with linkage to Hitler. Were Jews conspiring to dominate the world? Were they genetically inferior, carriers of disease and spreaders of insurrection? Were Jews behind every problem suffered by Germany?  The fact is that Jews were scapegoated, used as convenient targets to focus undeserved anger and hatred.

“Never Again”

Why should there be a pogrom against Jews?  What Hitler did was a horrific crime against humanity: genocide against innocent people.  The arrogant LibTard calumniates those of us who criticize and condemn Islam by suggesting that we want to emulate Hitler’s genocide.  In reality, we want to preserve ourselves and innocent humanity from intra-species predation by Muslims motivated by Islam which promises them eternity in Allah’s celestial bordello if they wage war against us and threatens them with eternal Hellfire if they refuse.   We  very much prefer to emancipate Muslims from Allah’s yoke of slavery by fighting the war on the ideological front. Unfortunately, our governments lack the intelligence and courage to wage the intellectual war. If they do not wise up soon we will eventually be forced to resort to nukes.

We can have life, liberty and prosperity or we can have Islam, we can not have both. Which do you chose?  How do you chose to defeat Islam?

Will you sign these petitions, cross post them and propagate them by email or are you part of the problem?

January 6, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

   

%d bloggers like this: