Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

All In The Family: Shaima Alawadis: Not Victim of Islamophobia!


All In The Family: Shaima Alawadis: Not Victim of Islamophobia!

Thanks and a tip of the hat to Bare Naked Islam! A few readers with elephantine
memories will recall the mysterious battery of Shaima Alawadis which
precipitated her death.  An obviously forged note was produced,
casting suspicion on an unknown “Islamophobe”. The usual line up of
self-righteous AssWholes proceeded to do their ritual
song & dance blaming “Islamophobia” & ‘hate speech” implying
that “right wing extremist” bloggers caused her death.

Months after the echo of the song reverberated their
last notes, an arrest has been made in the infamous case. The person
arrested is not an Islamophobe inspired to  murder by “extremist”
blog posts.  He is Shaima’s husband.  Her death has the
hallmarks of honoricide.

How convenient to blame her  death on
those who  sound a warning about the damnable doctrines &
practices of Islam including  genocidal conquest, slavery,
barbarian rapine & terrorism.   If the  government
would only silence us, Shaima would still be alive.  Yeah,
right.  I will not hold my breath waiting for an apology
from the LibTards & AssWholes.



View more videos at: http://nbcsandiego.com.

More related stories with numerous
polemical images linked at Bare Naked Islam, linked above.

 

We are all Shaima!

Shame on you: AssWholes! If married to a Muslim, you
very well could join her in the hospital if not the cemetery.  You
exploited a brutal murder for political gain, unjustly accusing the
innocent of  inspiring & inciting murder.  [Emphasis
added.]

4:34. Men are the protectors
and maintainers of
women
, because Allâh has made one of them to
excel the othe
r, and
because they spend (to support them) from their means. Therefore
the righteous women are devoutly obedient (to Allâh and to their
husbands), and guard in the husband’s absence what Allâh orders them to
guard (e.g. their chastity, their husband’s property,
etc.). As to those women on whose part you see ill­conduct,
admonish them (first), (next), refuse to share their beds, (and last) beat them
(lightly, if it is useful), but if they return to obedience, seek not
against them means (of annoyance). Surely, Allâh is Ever Most
High, Most Great.

The parenthetical “lightly, if it is useful”  is not in the
original Arabic text.  Source:  Corpus Quran

(4:34:28)

l-maḍājiʿi

the bed

N – genitive masculine plural
noun

اسم
مجرور
(4:34:29)

wa-iḍ’ribūhunna

and [finally] strike them.

CONJ – prefixed conjunction wa (and)

V – 2nd person masculine
plural imperative verb

PRON – subject pronoun

PRON – 3rd person feminine
plural object pronoun

الواو
عاطفة

فعل أمر والواو ضمير متصل في محل رفع فاعل و«هن» ضمير متصل في محل نصب
مفعول به

(4:34:30)

fa-in

Then if

REM – prefixed resumption
particle

COND – conditional particle

الفاء
استئنافية

حرف شرط

Alternative translations:  http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/4/34/
Tafsir Ibn Kathir teaches against severe beating.

Indeed Moe told his followers not to beat their
wives severely, but in doing so, he let the cat out of the bag. This
text is found on page 651of The Life of Muhammad.

You have rights over your wives and
they have rights over you. You

have the right that they should not defile your bed and that they should

not behave with open unseemliness. If they do, God allows you to put

them in separate rooms and to beat them but not
with severity
. If they

refrain from these things they have the right to their food and clothing

with kindness. Lay injunctions on women kindly, for they are prisoners

with you
having no control- of their persons
. You have taken them only

as a trust from God,3 and you have the enjoyment of their
persons by the


words of God, so
understand (T. and listen to) my words, 0 men, for

I have told you.

———————————-

3. *bi amanati ilah* This is a difficult phrase. It is probably to be
understood in the sense

of Sura 8. 27 and more particularly 33. 72 where the Quranic
commentators differ widely.

See Lane, 102a.

The oral traditions of Moe’s companions amplify the
concept for us.  Moe first told his companions not to beat their
wives, then he revised his order. And don’t beat your wife as you would
your slave girl.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 11, Number 2139:

Narrated Mu’awiyah al-Qushayri:

I went to the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) and asked him:
What do you say (command) about our wives? He replied: Give them food
what you have for yourself, and clothe them by which you clothe
yourself, and do not beat
them, and do not revile them
.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 11, Number 2141:

Narrated Abdullah ibn AbuDhubab:

Iyas ibn Abdullah ibn AbuDhubab reported the Apostle of Allah
(peace_be_upon_him) as saying: Do not beat Allah’s
handmaidens,
but when Umar came to the Apostle of Allah
(peace_be_upon_him) and said: Women have become
emboldened towards their husbands
, he (the Prophet) gave permission to beat
them
. Then many women came round the family of the Apostle of
Allah (peace_be_upon_him) complaining against their husbands. So the
Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) said: Many women have gone round
Muhammad’s family complaining against their husbands. They are not the
best among you.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 1, Number 0142:

Narrated Laqit ibn Sabirah:

I was the leader of the delegation of Banu al-Muntafiq or (the
narrator doubted) I was among the delegation of Banu al-Muntafiq that
came to the Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him). When we reached the
Prophet, we did not find him in his house. We found there Aisha, the
Mother of the Believers. She ordered that a dish called Khazirah should
be prepared for us. It was then prepared. A tray containing dates was
then presented to us. (The narrator Qutaybah did not mention the word
qina’, tray).

Then the Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) came. He asked:
Has anything been served to you or ordered for you? We replied: Yes,
Messenger of Allah. While we were sitting in the company of the
Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) we suddenly saw that a shepherd
was driving a herd of sheep to their fold. He had with him a newly-born
lamb that was crying.

He (the Prophet) asked him: What did it bear, O so and so? He
replied: A ewe. He then said: Slaughter for us in its place a sheep. Do
not think that we are slaughtering it for you. We have one hundred
sheep and we do not want their number to increase. Whenever a ewe is
born, we slaughter a sheep in its place.

(The narrator says that the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) used the
word la tahsabanna, do not think).

I (the narrator Laqit) then said: Messenger of Allah, I have a
wife who has something (wrong) in her tongue, i.e. she is insolent. He
said: Then divorce her. I said: Messenger of Allah, she had company
with me and I have children from her. He said: Then ask her (to obey
you). If there is something good in her, she will do so (obey); and do not beat your
wife as you beat your slave-girl.

I said: Messenger of Allah, tell me about ablution. He said:
Perform ablution in full and make the fingers go through the beard and
snuff with water well except when you are fasting.

Honoricide

The Qur’an depicts the killing of a boy who was
expected to dishonor his parents by taking the wrong path.  The
murder was in anticipation of the birth of a better child who would be
obedient and not sinful.

18:74. Then they both proceeded, till they met a boy, he (Khidr) killed him.
Mûsa (Moses) said: “Have you killed an innocent person who had
killed none? Verily, you have committed a thing “Nukra” (a great
Munkar – prohibited, evil, dreadful thing)!”

18:80. “And as for the boy, his parents were
believers, and we feared lest
he should oppress them by rebellion and disbelief.

18:81. “So we intended that their Lord should
change him for them for one better in righteousnes
s and near to
mercy.

Shari’ah provides no retaliation for killing one’s
offspring or grandchildren.  This is from page 584 of Reliance of
the Traveller.

O1.2 The following are not subject to retaliation:…

(4)  a father or mother (or their fathers or

mothers) for killing their
offspring, or offspring’s


offspring;

Muslims & LibTards: kindly kiss my big, smelly,
deformed & ulcerated foot!

November 9, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , | 1 Comment

Islamophobia in the Light of Hypocrisy


A Huffington Post article by Michael Shank triggered one of my Google Alerts. I have selected two excerpts for dissection.

The first excerpt follows a litany of “scares”, ending with Islamophobia.

 There is purpose here. When entire races, religions or regions are dehumanized, it is easier to wage war, expel immigrants, and forge new, discriminatory (or oppressive) domestic and foreign policies to deal with these vilified populations.

Which of those things did we do?  Did we wage war against Communism? Did we outlaw the Communist Party?  Did we arbitrarily expel Communists?  How about Catholics & Jews?   We did go to war against Japan, seems like there was some valid reason for that action. I do not remember Pearl Harbor, but some of my readers might.  The issue of internment is highly charged, but I have seen indications that the policy had some grounding in reality.

Next, we get down to the issue: Islamic violence.

We have few notions of Islam and nonviolence, in large part because our fear has focused on the extreme outliers and because our largely Christian nation has not yet fully embraced — in media, policy, education or law — religious diversity, no matter how nonviolent, peaceful and tolerant the religion’s majority. It is time we do so. There is much to embrace — if only we open our eyes to it.

dehumanized

Islam depicts Jews as those who “earned Allah’s anger”; Christians as those who “went astray“. It describes Jews as the “worst of living creatures“; “apes and swine“.  It curses us  and declares war on us.

notions of Islam and nonviolence

Are notions of nonviolent Islam grounded in reality?   Here is a list of the Islamic episodes of violence  in the table of contents of Guillaume’s The Life of Muhammad.

The first raid: on Waddan 281
Hamza’s raid to the coast 283
Raid on Buwat 285
Raid on al-‘Ushayra 285
Raid on al-Kharrar 286
Raid on Safawan 286
Fighting in the sacred month 286
The change of the Qibla 289
Battle of Badr
Raid on B. Sulaym 360
Raid called al-Sawiq 361
Raid on Dhu Amarr 362
Raid on al-Furu’ 362
Attack on B. Qaynuqa’ 363
Raid on al-Qarada 364
Killing of Ka’b b. al-Ashraf 364
Muhayyisa and Huwayyisa 369
Battle of Uhud 370
The Quran on UQud 391
The day of al-Raji’ 426
Treachery at Bi’r Ma’una 433
B. al-Nadir exiled 437
Raid of Dhatu’l-Riqa’ 445
Last expedition to Badr
Raid on Dumatu’l-Jandal 449
Battle of the Ditch 456
Attack on B. Qurayza 461
Killing of Sallam 482
Attack on B. Lihyan 485
Attack on Dhu Qarad 486
Attack on B. al-Mustaliq
Raid on Mu’ta 531
The occupation of Mecca 540
Khalid followed by ‘Ali go forth as missionaries 561
Khalid destroys al-‘Uzza 565
Battle of Hunayn 566
Capture of al-Ta’if 587
Division of the spoils of Hawazin
Raid on TabUk
Ghalib’s raid on B. al-Mulawwah 660
Zayd’s raid on Judham 662
Zayd’s raid on B. Fazara 664
‘Abdullah b. Rawaha’s raid to kill al- Yusayr 665
‘Abdullah b. Unays’s raid to kill Khalid b. Sufyan 666
‘Uyayna’s raid on B. al-‘ Anbar 667
Ghalib’s raid on B. Murra 667
‘Amr b. al-‘ As’s raid on Dhatu’l-Salasil 668
Ibn Abu Hadrad’s raid on Idam 669
His raid on al-Ghaba 671
‘Abdu’l-Rabznan’s raid on Dumatu’l-Jandal 672
Abu ‘Ubayda’s raid to the coast 673
Salim b. ‘Umayr’s raid to kill Abu’ Afak
‘Umayr b. ‘Adiy’s raid to kill’ Asma’ 675
Capture of Thumama b. Athal 676
‘Alqama’s raid 677
Kurz’s raid on the Bajilis 677
‘Ali’s raid on the Yaman 678

extreme outliers

Was the founder of Islam an extreme outlier?   He said that he was “ordered to fight the people“. He said that he was “made victorious with terror“.  No, Muhammad defined Islam, and set its standard with the exemplary conduct listed in the contents of his biography.

Is Allah, Islam’s deity, an extreme outlier?  He ordained jihad for Muslims. He commanded Muslims to wage war against pagans until resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped on a global scale.  Allah commanded Muslims to wage war against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and extorted.

Are Al-Qaeda, HAMAS & Hezbollah extreme outliers or are they Salafists, obedient to Allah and emulating Muhammad?

religious diversity

Muhammad said “I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim.“.

nonviolent, peaceful

Are they believers? Or are they hypocrites? If they are believers, they are neither nonviolent nor peaceful.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .

If they are nonviolent and peaceful, then: [See 9:84…89 for the definition of hypocrites.]

4:88. Then what is the matter with you that you are divided into two parties about the hypocrites? Allâh has cast them back (to disbelief) because of what they have earned. Do you want to guide him whom Allâh has made to go astray? And he whom Allâh has made to go astray, you will never find for him any way (of guidance).

4:89. They wish that you reject Faith, as they have rejected (Faith), and thus that you all become equal (like one another). So take not Auliyâ’ (protectors or friends) from them, till they emigrate in the Way of Allâh (to Muhammad ). But if they turn back (from Islâm), take (hold) of them and kill them wherever you find them, and take neither Auliyâ’ (protectors or friends) nor helpers from them.

9:68. Allâh has promised the hypocrites; men and women, and the disbelievers, the Fire of Hell, therein shall they abide. It will suffice them. Allâh has cursed them and for them is the lasting torment.

tolerant

Why are there no churches in Saudi Arabia?  Why are Christians murdered, their churches & homes destroyed with impunity in Egypt, Indonesia, Kenya & Nigeria?

much to embrace

Does that include genocidal conquest & terrorism?  Do you embrace child brides, who can be divorced before they reach menarche?  Do you embrace a legal code in which a woman’s testimony is worth half that of her husband?  Do you embrace the return of Jesus Christ as a genocidal warlord?

September 28, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Awl Pierces Breivik, Skewering Geller, Spencer and Others


Abe Sauer , posted at the Awl, what he obviously thinks is a sharp attack upon  authors, speakers & bloggers who expose the core doctrines of Islam to public scrutiny.  Lets take a closer look.

After years of ratcheted-up rhetoric, it was only a matter of time before some right-winger deduced to take what he saw as the natural next step.

In 1995, President Clinton tried to blame McVeigh’s OKC bombing on Rush Limbaugh.  But Rush never suggested that anyone should blow up a federal office building or otherwise engage in militant rebellion.  The accusation was  a completely unwarranted by facts and logic.   Six years later, LibTards employ the same tired tactic against Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller, and others who expose Islam.

“Only a matter of time”: a cause–effect relationship is postulated where none exists.  The rational critics of Islam are neither ordering nor inciting bombings & shooting sprees.  They are publishing relevant facts and logical observations on those facts. If Geller or Spencer had suggested or demanded vigilantism, Sauer would be dancing around the may pole chortling with glee about it. He ain’t because they didn’t.

“Some right winger”: In 1964 it was all about cries of “right wing” & “extremism”.  No logical or factual argument was levied against Goldwater because none was possible.  No logical or factual argument is possible against Geller & Spencer; instead, the LibTards resort to argumentum ad hominem.  Loaded words don’t cut the mustard.

There is often a difference between the apparent target and the real objective. The present case is exemplary. Eventually, Sauer gets down to his real target.

Bachmann has long cozied to anti-Muslim activists, understanding that the passion behind their single-issue support makes noise for candidates. As a presidential candidate, she signed the anti-Sharia pledge, which won her praise with the likes of bloggers like Robert Spencer, author of Jihad Watch, a blog cited numerous times by Breivik as inspirational.

Presidential politics is not incidental to the matter, it is central; this is a direct smear aimed at one of the leading contenders for the ’12 Republican nomination.  How does one grapple with loaded phrases such as  “cozied to” ?  “Anti-Muslim activists” are assumed to be the focus of evil in the modern world, without factual or logical basis for the assumption.  First Sauer smears Geller & spencer, next he associates a presidential aspirent with them to smear her.

“Cited numerous times by Breivik as inspirational”: Breivik obtained information from Spencer’s writings, not inspiration. Inspiration comes from exemplars, not teachers.  It is obvious that Breivik’s inspiration comes from McVeigh’s bomb technology and Muslim terrorists’ numerous shooting attacks.

In his manifesto, Breivik recommended both Geller and Spencer for guidance.

If he was guided by Geller & Spencer, Breivik would have confined his activities to education & lobbying, avoiding violence.  He obtained factual information from them, but not guidance.

Observe the flow of loaded words in this excerpt.

Even more mainstream writers are tied to the populist vilification of Islam. The National Review now regularly partners with the topic, as its reader base longs for more information on the impending threat of America’s Islamification. National Review writer Andrew McCarthy put his name on a book called “Shariah: The Threat to America.”

“Populist vilification”:  the pot calls the kettle black.  As more people become informed of Islam’s core doctrines & practices, the movement grows. It is popular, not populist.  This is not about a contest between the elite and uninformed mobs, it is a contest between the self-anointed   elite deceivers and an increasingly informed segment of the electorate, a segment of which the elite are becoming increasingly afraid.

“Mainstream” is not a term LibTards use to describe The National Review, instead, they would label it “right wing  extremist”.  Andrew McCarthy was a federal prosecutor who built the case against the Sheikh behind the first WTC attack. He found it necessary to study the Qur’an & hadith in building his case.  Because he learned what Shari’ah really is, from the original sources, he is smeared as a populist engaged in vilification of Islam.

Observe how the language is perverted in the next excerpt.

In Tennessee, the law even defines Sharia as “a legal-political-military doctrinal system.” Lawmakers said the bill was necessary to prevent “homegrown terror,” which would be funny today if it were not tragic.

Terrorism is a doctrine and practice of Islam, enshrined in the Qur’an and exemplified by Moe’s sunnah.  Home grown or imported, terrorism is terrorism. As used by the proponents of anti-Shari’ah legislation, terrorism refers to Islamic terrorism.  Breivik is home grown, and a terrorist inspired by his enemy’s example.

Terrorism is a battle tactic: a means of weakening their victims; rendering them incapable of mounting an effective defense.  “Casting terror into the hearts” of disbelievers is sanctified in the Qur’an, particularly in 3:151 & 8:12. Moe and Allah said that they would cast terror. Then, in 33:26 & 59:2, they said that they cast terror and described the results: death, enslavement and dispossession of disbelievers.  Moe said that he was made victorious with terror, in Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

Shari’ah is an all encompassing set of rules for the guidance of all Muslims at all times, in all places. It codifies Allah’s imperatives and Moe’s exemplary conduct.

Shari’ah tells Muslims how to purify themselves and pray. it tells them how to bury their dead. Big deal; that harms nobody except the deluded Muslims. It also governs marriage and divorce. it gives the father of a pre-pubescent virgin the right to marry her off without her consent.  Doubters & dissenters should dig into Book M of Reliance of the Traveller and read M3.13.

Shari’ah is supposed to be about family matters, totally innocuous. Is marriage a family matter? Is divorce a family matter?  Reliance of the Traveller, Book N. treats of divorce. In the previous paragraph, I linked to a provision of Shari’ah which permits a father to compel his minor virgin daughter to marry the man of his choice at the time of his choice.  Should pre-pubescent girls be married and divorced?  Knowing that I will not be believed, I present objective evidence.

N9.2

A waiting period is obligatory for a woman divorced after intercourse, whether the husband and wife are prepubescent, have reached puberty, or one has and the other has not.

Intercourse means copulation (def: n7.7).  If the husband was alone with her but did not copulate with her, and then divorced her, there is no waiting period.

Shari’ah provides for the marriage and divorce of girls who have not yet reached puberty.  By the way, divorce is effected by repeating “I divorce you” three times.  LibTards oppose laws barring Shari’ah from our courts and mock us for proposing them.

Shari’ah is all about innocuous matters; prayer, charity, funerals, marriage & divorce.  Yeah, right.  Reliance of the Traveller, Book O treats of “justice”. Its ninth chapter begins with the legal definition of jihad: to wage war against disbelievers.  It also prescribes the “religious obligation” to perform jihad, against disbelievers peacefully minding their own business in their own countries: “meaning upon the Muslims each year”

What does the caliph do about that obligation? “The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians “. “The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim ”  Of course, Shari’ah is innocuous & anodyne, lets enshrine it in our courts.  Yeah, right.

Is there any end to loaded language?

The anti-Muslim sentiment that in its extreme bred Norway’s shooter has only manifested so far in the U.S. in individual assaults and community “incidents”—such as the one in February in Yorba Linda, California, where a Muslim relief organization with perceived ties to terrorism was protested by attendees waving American flags and yelling “terrorist go home” to women and children.

“Anti-Muslim sentiment”  “bred Norway’s shooter”.  None but his progenitors bred  Breivik; actions are not dictated by sentiments. Knowing that Islam is a predatory institution which poses a clear, proximate and persistent existential threat is not a license to kill.  “Perceived ties to terrorism”; ” 1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey. ”  “I have been made victorious with terror “. Who tied Islam to terrorism?

Yes, it gets worse, much worse. Observe the egregious hypocrisy exemplified in the final excerpt.

Lost on nobody, in condemning the acts, right wing radicals in the U.S. and Norway sounded exactly like the Muslim community they so suspect—”We never advocate violence” is parroted by many, who then blame violent acts on lone, misled members of their ideology. (Familiar story.)

Violence: genocidal global conquest using terror as a battle tactic is an intrinsic part of the core of Islam, exemplified by its founder.  LibTards and other ignorant fools have not read the Noble Qur’an, specifically Surahs Al-Anfal & At-Taubah, which contain the jihad imperatives.  The exemplification is contained in the Jihad & Expedition books of Sahih Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, Sunan Abu Dawud  & Malik’s Muwatta.

According to Allah, believers sell their lives & wealth to him, fight in his cause, killing others and being killed; in return for which he admits them to Paradise.   Allah threatens those who refuse to join the jihad with painful torment. Allah promises victory to those who fight, along with admission to Paradise. Allah promises a reward for any step taken to injure or enrage disbelievers.

Kindly find the New Testament functional equivalents of 3:151, 8:12, 57, 60, 65, 67, 9:5, 29, 30, 111, 120, 123, 33:26, 27, 47:4, 49:15 59:2, 15 & Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220. I mean explicit commands, threats, promises & boasts, not parables.  Show me or quit trying to deflect criticism of Islam with argumentum Tu-Quoque.

July 27, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Jerks, Jihad, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Dance of the Liars


Bare Naked Islam posted a video of  Attorney General Holder’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee.  In this video, Eric Holder is being questioned by Rep. Lamar Smith R, Tx., who is trying to coax the A.G. into giving a straight answer to a crooked question. This dialog demands close attention, there is some cross talk involved.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOQt_mP6Pgg&feature=player_embedded

I have attempted to format Rep. Smith’s questions  in Century Gothic and A.G. Holder’s answers in Ariel.

In the case of all three attempts in the last year, the terrorist attempts, one of which was successful,  those individuals have had ties to radical Islam.  Do you feel that these individuals might have been incited to take the actions that they did because of  radical Islam?

Because of? —Radical Islam.–There are a variety of reasons why I think people have taken these actions. Its hard–I think you have to look at each individual case. I mean we are in the process now of  talking to Mr. Shahzad to try to understand what it is that drove him to take the action he took.

But  radical Islam could have been one of the reasons ?

There are a variety of reasons–But was radical Islam one of  them? —  There are a variety of reasons why people do these things. Some of them are potentially religious convictions–But all I’m asking is if you think among those variety of reasons, radical Islam might have been one of the reasons that the individuals took the steps that they did?– We say radical Islam…I think those people who espouse a version of Islam that is not–Are you uncomfortable with attributing any of their actions to radical Islam it sounds like it?–No, I don’t want to say anything negative about a religion that is not appropriateI’m talking about radical Islam, I’m not talking about the general religion–Right and I’m saying  that a person like Anwar Awlaki,– for instance, who has a version of Islam that is not consistent with the teachings of of it and espouses a radical version–Could Radical Islam have motivated have motivated these individuals to take the steps that they did? –I certainly think that it is possible that people who espouse a radical version of Islam have had an ability to have an impact on people like Mr. Shahzad.–And could it have been the case in one of these three instances ?–Could that have been the case?–Yes–again, could one of these three individuals have been incited by radical Islam? Apparently you feel that they could have been.– I think potentially incited by a view of Islam that is inconsistent with–It is hard to get an answer   yes or no but let me go on to my next question, …

Rush Limbaugh & Sean  Hannity had fun with this video clip, playing the sound track for their audiences.  They drew attention to the fact that Holder carefully avoided attributing terror attacks to “radical Islam”.  Since I am an amateur, not dependent on advertisers for revenue, I can analyze the dialog more deeply than the professionals who are beholden to political correctness.

There are two critical statements in the dialog.

  • “No, I don’t want to say anything negative about a religion that is not appropriate”
  • “I’m talking about radical Islam, I’m not talking about the general religion”

These politicians are trying to convey a false concept of Islam: that it is a religion with  ‘radical’ and ‘moderate’ forms.  Islam is a way of life, not a religion.  Its religious component is a social control mechanism which shields the aggressive way of life from recognition while it motivates Muslims to participate in genocidal conquest.  Their tactic has two objectives: first, to avoid being labeled  “racist” & “bigot”, second to avoid offending potential voters.

Some insightful person whose identity I have forgotten, said “Its Islam, Stupid.”.  Qualifiers such as ‘radical’ and catch phrases such as ‘Islamofascism’ distract us from objective factual reality which few are willing to acknowledge.

This hadith reveals too much about Islam, pay close attention to the parts I have emphasized.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

Jihad and agriculture are presented as alternative ways of life, agriculture is rejected in favor of jihad.  Jihad is their “original religion”.  That should give you a clue.

Don’t hand me the standard line of crap about jihad being a struggle against your ego. Moe waged war against anyone he could plunder, he did not struggle against temptation. After all, he married a six year old girl. He also married the wife of his adopted son  and seven other women besides captives and slaves he sexually exploited.  Jihad is defined in Islamic law as “to war against non-Muslims“.
One  Qur’an verse  conveys vital knowledge, affording you another clue.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .

Fight in Allah’s cause, kill & be killed; its what Muslims do.  Got a clue yet?  The Qur’an mandates jihad, declaring that it is ordained for Muslims.  It also commands Muslims to wage war against disbelievers. Surah Al-Anfal  39 commands Muslims to fight pagans until  resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped.  Surah At-Taubah 29 commands them to fight “people of the book”  until we are subjugated and submit to annual extortion demands. Moe confirmed those imperatives, as recorded in Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387.

Think back to the playing of the cockpit voice recorder after 9/11.  What did they say while they slit the  throats of the crew?  What did Nidal Malik Hasan  say when he opened fire at Fort Hood?  Why shout “Allāhu Akbar”? Mohammad Atta has the  answer for you: “When the confrontation begins, strike like champions who do not want to go back to this world. Shout, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers.”  Allah is greatest just happens to be what they say when they slaughter a goat for eid and when slitting the throat of a captive.

What is the objective of striking fear?  It is done for the purpose of rendering us confused, agitated and unable to mount an effective defense; to make us easy prey.  It is commanded in Surah Al-Anfal 12 & 60.  It is exemplified in Surat Al-Ahzab 26 & Al-Hashr 2. It is celebrated in Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  Terrorism is not exceptional.  Terrorism is not radical. Terrorism is not extreme; it is an intrinsic part of orthodox Islam.

Full documentation of the fatal facts outlined in this blog post is freely available.

  • Islamic Terror.chm [30.4KB] A 6 part series from Freedom Ain’t Free.
  • Jihad.chm [45KB] A 6 part series from Freedom Ain’t Free.
  • What’s Wrong With Islam/Muslims.chm [23KB].
  • Islamic Supremacism [49KB] A 3 part series from Freedom Ain’t Free.
  • Islam’s Mercenary Mission 08/30/09 Full exposure of the dirty details of Islam’s foundational purpose: accrual of spoils & sex slaves. It is a war cult, not a ‘religion of peace’. This post is intended to serve as a reference link for bloggers & forum participants who expose Islam to the ignorant.  Post a link to it instead of re-inventing the wheel.
  • FOMIJihad.chm [163.4KB] The Offensive Jihad thread from the old  FOMI anti Islam forum. This thread contains several significant quotes from Fiqh, both ancient and modern.
  • What’s Wrong With Islam/Muslims? 10/10/09 If nothing else, read this post and share it with all your family, friends & associates. This post contains the most vital information about Islam, fully documented and including common sense refutations of the most popular objections raised by bigoted multicultural idiots.  Copy this post, paste it into an email, and send it to everyone you can hope to influence. Exhort the recipients to forward it.

Now is the time for the electorate to disrespectfully demand honesty from our  deceptive and cowardly politicians.  Tell them  that if they continue to lie to us, we will remember Nov. 2 ‘ 10.

May 14, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Obanination: Flight 253 Part 3


In the third installment of this series of blog posts about President Obama’s treacherous blathering about  the terrorist attack on Flight 253, I deal with his remarks of January 2, ’10. Click this link for Video  of his statement.

Remarks of President Barack Obama
Weekly Address
January 2, 2010

It has now been more than a week since the attempted act of terrorism aboard that flight to Detroit on Christmas Day.  On Thursday, I received the preliminary findings of the reviews that I ordered into our terrorist watchlist system and air travel screening.  I’ve directed my counterterrorism and homeland security advisor at the White House, John Brennan, to lead these reviews going forward and to present the final results and recommendations to me in the days to come.

As I said this week, I will do everything in my power to make sure our hard-working men and women in our intelligence, law enforcement and homeland security communities have the tools and resources they need to keep America safe.  This includes making sure these communities-and the people in them-are coordinating effectively and are held accountable at every level.  And as President, that is what I will do.

Months passed between the arrests of two previous underwear bombers  and the  warning issued by the terrorist’s father yet you did not modify our screening procedures and you did not put the bomber on the no fly list.  Do those failures result from incompetence, treason or both?  I think  the law of multiple causation applies to this case.

Meanwhile, the investigation into the Christmas Day incident continues, and we’re learning more about the suspect.  We know that he traveled to Yemen, a country grappling with crushing poverty and deadly insurgencies.  It appears that he joined an affiliate of al Qaeda, and that this group-al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula-trained him, equipped him with those explosives and directed him to attack that plane headed for America.

This is not the first time this group has targeted us.  In recent years, they have bombed Yemeni government facilities and Western hotels, restaurants and embassies-including our embassy in 2008, killing one American.  So, as President, I’ve made it a priority to strengthen our partnership with the Yemeni government-training and equipping their security forces, sharing intelligence and working with them to strike al Qaeda terrorists.

Islamic tyrannies are not our partners nor allies; they are our enemies. Allah explicitly forbids friendship/partnership with disbelievers in several Qur’an verses. Those tyrants are interested in their own tenure on the throne, not in our security or survival. While they fight al-Qaeda at home, they sponsor al-Qaeda attacks against us.

And even before Christmas Day, we had seen the results.  Training camps have been struck; leaders eliminated; plots disrupted.  And all those involved in the attempted act of terrorism on Christmas must know-you too will be held to account.

Terrorists are a fungible commodity; they can be replaced. Ushering them into Hell after an attack does not reverse the attack nor does it prevent future attacks. You must eliminate the current terrorists and their recruitment base.  There will not be peace and security on this earth while there are Muslims on it.

But these efforts are only part of a wider cause.  It’s been nearly a year since I stood on the steps of the U.S. Capitol and took the oath of office as your President.  And with that oath came the solemn responsibility that I carry with me every moment of every day-the responsibility to protect the safety and security of the American people.

On that day I also made it very clear-our nation is at war against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred, and that we will do whatever it takes to defeat them and defend our country, even as we uphold the values that have always distinguished America among nations.

The entity which is waging war against us is Islam. Why won’t you identify it by name and honestly describe its doctrines and practices?  Muslims are persistent. They are motivated by a demonic promise of  carnal reward in the after life if they die in an attempt to kill  or conquer us. They are motivated by a demonic threat of eternal Hellfire if they refuse to go to war against us.

To stop Muslims from attacking us, you must either cause them to cease being Muslims or cease living.  Nothing less will stop their series of attacks. You can not pacify or appease them and you can’t change their doctrine.  Our treasury was drained in tribute to the Barbary Pirates before President Jefferson wised up and sent toe Marines to Tripoli.  Get a clue.

And make no mistake, that’s exactly what we’ve been doing.  It’s why I refocused the fight-bringing to a responsible end the war in Iraq, which had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks, and dramatically increasing our resources in the region where al Qaeda is actually based, in Afghanistan and Pakistan.  It’s why I’ve set a clear and achievable mission-to disrupt, dismantle and defeat al Qaeda and its extremist allies and prevent their return to either country.

The war against Iraq can not come to a responsible end while its citizens and government remain Islamic. While they are Muslims, they are our enemies; they will return to membership in the set of terror sponsoring states. There is no other possibility.  You have not won that war, you have lost it. You have wasted invaluable blood and treasure.

The hijackers were trained at a special facility in Salman Pak. Al-Qaeda also received CBW training from Saddam Hussein’s regime. In 1993, a truck bomb was detonated in the World Trade Center. Who mixed the chemicals for that bomb? Where did he receive sanctuary after the attack?  Where did the terrorist behind the hijacking of the  Achille Lauro receive sanctuary?  These words of yours, juxtaposed with those words about Iraq, prove you to be a lying traitor.

On that day I also made it very clear-our nation is at war against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred, and that we will do whatever it takes to defeat them and defend our country, even as we uphold the values that have always distinguished America among nations.

the war in Iraq, which had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks

And it’s why we’ve forged new partnerships, as in Yemen, and put unrelenting pressure on these extremists wherever they plot and train-from East Africa to Southeast Asia, from Europe to the Persian Gulf.  And though often out of sight, our progress has been unmistakable.  Along with our partners, we’ve disrupted terrorist financing, cut off recruiting chains, inflicted major losses on al Qaeda’s leadership, thwarted plots here in the United States, and saved countless American lives.

Any disbeliever who thinks he has  Muslim partners is actually a useful idiot, being manipulated by Muslims. Muslims do not form partnerships with disbelievers. You did not save any lives Dec. 25, blind luck saved 277.  Your idiotic policies damn near cost 277 lives, but we got lucky that day.

Terrorists are believers, not extremists. To comprehend this fatal fact, read the following ayat. The connecting word is spend, it is what believers do. They spend in Allah’s cause. What do they spend? Read 9:120 and re-read it until you get a clue.

Allah’s cause is making Islam dominant. The imperative is issued in 9:33 and exemplified in Sahih Bukhari  4.52.65.

Yet as the Christmas Day attempt illustrates, and as we were reminded this week by the sacrifices of more brave Americans in Afghanistan-including those seven dedicated men and women of the CIA-the hard work of protecting our nation is never done.  So as our reviews continue, let us ask the questions that need to be asked.  Let us make the changes that need to be made.  Let us debate the best way to protect the country we all love.  That is the right and responsibility of every American and every elected official.

Those CIA agents  murdered by a suicide bomber died because they were told by a traitor that they have Muslim allies. They died because the Muslim allied with them was a double agent and they, in their blind faith, trusted him enough not to check him for bombs before meeting with him.

But as we go forward, let us remember this-our adversaries are those who would attack our country, not our fellow Americans, not each other. Let’s never forget what has always carried us through times of trial, including those attacks eight Septembers ago.

What is the nationality of Maj. Nidal Malik Hassan?  Were the men and women he shot his fellow Americans?  Was he their fellow American?  Do you think with your anal sphincter instead of your brain?  Do you imagine in your  arrogant conceit that we are too stupid to think clearly enough to detect your lies?  Maj. Hassan’s nationality is Muslim.  He is a member of  Ummah-al-Islamiya, not  an American yet he was a member of our armed forces and was treated as a citizen. Get a clue for Chrissake.

Three thousand people were not carried through the Abomination; they were crushed and burned to death.  Your moronic platitudes induce incontinence.

Instead of giving in to fear and cynicism, let’s renew that timeless American spirit of resolve and confidence and optimism.  Instead of succumbing to partisanship and division, let’s summon the unity that this moment demands.  Let’s work together, with a seriousness of purpose, to do what must be done to keep our country safe.

As we begin this New Year, I cannot imagine a more fitting resolution to guide us-as a people and as a nation.

To make our nation safe, we need to exclude the enemy fifth column from it. We need to get rid of Islam, on a  national and global scope. Because you are a politician, you can not acknowledge that need and seek to divert our attention from it.

January 5, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , | Leave a comment

Netanyahu’s Security Speech


I received an unofficial transcript of P.M. Netanyahu’s speech from the Israel Project.  At the time of this writing, it was not yet available on their web site. Haaretz has posted a transcript. I have reproduced the TIP version below, in block quote format and Ariel font. My comments are interspersed with full margins in Times font.

This is an unofficial transcript of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s speech of June 14, 2009 at Bar Ilan Univerasity, produced by The Israel Project

Honored guests, citizens of Israel.

Peace was always the desire of our people. Our prophets had a vision of peace, we greet each other with peace, our prayers end with the word peace. This evening we are in the center named for two leaders who were groundbreakers for peace -Menachem Begin and Anwar Sadat – and we share their vision.

Two and a half months ago, I was sworn in at the Knesset as the Prime Minister of Israel. I promised that I would establish a unity government, and did so. I believed, and still believe, that we need unity now more than ever before.

We are currently facing three tremendous challenges: The Iranian threat, the financial crisis, and the promotion of peace.

The Iranian threat still is before us in full force, as it became quite clear yesterday. The greatest danger to Israel, to the Middle East, and to all of humanity, is the encounter between extremist Islam and nuclear weapons.

extremist Islam

The adjective implies the existence of a “moderate”  Islam and an “extremist” deviation from the standard. In reality, genocidal, terrorist Jihad is the standard, not a deviation. Doubters & dissenters are directed to read Surah Al-Anfal & Surah At-Taubah. and follow up with Sahih Bukhari : Jihad. for a few retards, that may be insufficient proof. For them, I prescribe extra homework: Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9 and my blog post: ROPMA.

Islam is bound by a demonic mandate to conquer & subjugate the entire world. Nuclear weapons will increase their chances of success. We have good reason to doubt that Iran will hesitate to use them. Tons of prevention are worth megatons of cure.

I discussed this with President Obama on my visit to Washington, and will be discussing it next week on my visit with European leaders. I have been working tirelessly for many years to form an international front against Iran arming itself with nuclear armaments.

With the world financial crisis, we acted immediately to bring about stability to the Israeli economy. We passed a two-year budget in the government and will pass it through the Knesset very soon.

The second challenge, rather, the third, so very important challenge, facing us today, is promoting peace. I discussed this also with President Obama. I strongly support the idea of regional peace that he is advancing. I share the President of the USA’s desire to bring about a new era of reconciliation in our region.

reconciliation

Islam has never been conciliated; it can not be reconciled!  Islam demands a total monopoly on faith & practice on a global scale. It can never be reconciled to Jewish irredentism because territory conquered by Muslims must remain in Islamic control forever, without exception.

I discussed this in my meetings with President Mubarak in Egypt and with King Abdullah in Jordan to obtain the assistance of these leaders in the effort to expand the circle of peace in our region.

I appeal tonight to the leaders of the Arab countries and say: Let us meet. Let us talk about peace. Let us make peace. I am willing to meet at any time, at any place, in Damascus, in Riyadh, in Beirut, and in Jerusalem as well. (Applause)

talk about peace

You can talk about peace until you are blue in the face, but you can’t make peace. Only the aggressors can make peace, and they won’t because their demon demands that they exterminate you. Moe set murdering the last Jew as a prerequisite for Judgment Day, when the Muslims will obtain their long awaited admission to the lush gardens of  Paradise.  This fatal fact is recorded among the compiled oral traditions in Sahih Muslim 41.6985.

I call upon the leaders of the Arab countries to join together with the Palestinians and with us to promote economic peace. Economic peace is not a substitute for peace, but it is a very important component in achieving it. Together we can advance projects that can overcome the problems facing our region. For example, water desalinization. And we can utilize the advantages of our region, such as maximizing the use of solar energy, or utilizing its geographical advantages to lay pipelines, pipelines to Africa and Europe

Economic peace

Jihad is fought with wealth as well as with the sword.  Netanyahu knows that peace is impossible in the short term. He apparently hopes that increased economic interdependence would serve as a disincentive to Jihad.

To many left wingers and ignoramuses, Jihad is a function of poverty. In fact, Jihad is doctrine driven, not grievance driven. The economic angle in Jihad is to be found in the foundation of the system, which is the spoils mentioned in 8:1, 8:41, 33:27 & 48:15-21.

Together we can realize the initiatives that I see in the Persian Gulf, which amaze the entire world, and also amaze me. I call upon the talented entrepreneurs of the Arab world, to come and invest here, to assist the Palestinians and us, to give the economy a jump-start. Together we can develop industrial zones, we can create thousands of jobs, and foster tourism that will draw millions, people who want to walk in the footsteps of history, in Nazareth and Bethlehem, in the heights of Jericho and on the walls of Jerusalem, on the shore of the Sea of Galilee, and at the baptismal site of the Jordan. There is a huge potential for the development of tourism potential here. If you only agree to work together.

If you only

“If only there weren’t any Jews here, we could have the profits all to ourselves.”  That is what the Arabs hear in this discussion. The beautiful dream of shared prosperity is exactly that, a dream which will never be realized.

I appeal to you, our Palestinian neighbors, and to the leadership of the Palestinian Authority. Let us begin peace negotiations immediately without prior conditions. Israel is committed to international agreements, and expects all sides to fulfill their obligations.

peace negotiations

Have negotiations with Muslims ever generated anything but escalating violence? Is not insanity exemplified by doing the same thing repeatedly, expecting different results? There is and will always be one essential pre-condition: you must surrender and submit to Islam before negotiations can begin.

I say to the Palestinians: We want to live with you in peace, quiet, and good neighborly relations. We want our children and your children to ‘know war no more.’

We want

Such sweet sentiment; you want to live in peace with Falestinians.  Unfortunately your love is and will remain unrequited. They desire to defeat and destroy you, it is their demonic mission which they can not abandon upon pain of Hellfire.

We do not want parents and wives, sons and daughters, brothers and sisters, to know the sorrow of bereavement. We want our children to dream of a better future for humankind. We want us and our neighbors to devote our efforts to ‘plowshares and pruning hooks’ and not to ‘swords and spears…’ I know the terror of war, I participated in battles, I lost good friends who fell [in battle], I lost a brother. I saw the pain of bereaved families from up close – very many times. I do not want war. No one in Israel wants war. (Applause)

I do not want war

More sweet sentiments, which, to the ears of the Muslims, is the cry of injured prey calling them to renew their attack.  Predators keenly seek such signs of weakness, which  serve as their invitation to attack.  War is imposed upon you, not your choice. Your choice is to be victorious or defeated. Victory is the total elimination of Islam; anything less is defeat.

Let us join hands and work together in peace, together with our neighbors. There is no limit to the flourishing growth that we can achieve for both peoples – in the economy, in agriculture, in commerce, tourism, education – but, above all, in the ability to give our younger generation hope to live in a place that’s good to live in, a life of creative work, a peaceful life with much of interest, with opportunity and hope.

hope to live

You hope to live, they hope to be ‘martyred’ and thereby to earn admission into gardens flowing with rivers of wine, honey and milk, with trees full of low  hanging fruit, houris who grow new hymens every day and little boys who never bleed.  Islam does not share your hierarchy of needs. To Islam, this world is a brief preface to an eternity in gardens of plenty & unending carnal pleasure. They sold this life for the hereafter. Read 9:111 and get a clue!

Friends, with the advantages of peace so clear, so obvious, we must ask ourselves why is peace still so far from us, even though our hands are extended for peace? Why has the conflict going on for over 60 years? To bring an end to it, there must be a sincere, genuine answer to the question: what is the root of the conflict? In his speech at the Zionist Congress in Basel, in speaking of his grand vision of a Jewish homeland for the Jewish People, Theodor Herzl, the visionary of the State of Israel, said: This is so big, we must talk about it only in the simplest words possible.

I now am asking that when we speak of the huge challenge of peace, we must use the simplest words possible, using person to person terms. Even with our eyes on the horizon, we must have our feet on the ground, firmly rooted in truth. The simple truth is that the root of the conflict has been – and remains – the refusal to recognize the right of the Jewish People to its own state in its historical homeland.

root of the conflict

Moe created Islam for the purpose of maintaining a constant state of war from which he would obtain wealth, income and sex slaves. He adopted stories from Hebrew pseudagraphia, expecting that Jews would accept him as a prophet and adopt his new cult. Instead they recognized him as a plagiarist &  profiteer and rejected Islam.  That is the foundation of Islam’s hatred of Jews. You can’t buy peace, you can rent it briefly.  You can’t buy their love; you can usher them into Hell. You will not obtain peace by any means short of ushering them into Hell.

In 1947 when the United Nations proposed the Partition Plan for a Jewish state and an Arab state, the entire Arab world rejected the proposal, while the Jewish community accepted it with great rejoicing and dancing. The Arabs refused any Jewish state whatsoever, with any borders whatsoever.

Arabs refused

That should be a clue to you. Why can’t Jews comprehend the fatal facts of Islam? Muslims are commanded to fight Jews and Christians until we are humiliated, subjugated & extorted. They can’t get into Paradise until they complete your genocide. Allah promised them victory; that he would give them your land to keep forever.  He promised them that they would defeat armies twice as numerous as their own. The reconstituted state of Israel is living proof of the fact that Allah is an impotent idol. No Muslim can tolerate that blasphemy!  You need a clue;  obtain one by downloading EgregiousAyat.chm and reading the chapters on triumphalism & supremacism.

Whoever thinks that the continued hostility to Israel is a result of our forces in Judea, Samaria and Gaza is confusing cause and effect. The attacks on us began in the 1920s, became an overall attack in 1948 when the state was declared, continued in the 1950s with the fedaayyin attacks, and reached their climax in 1967 on the eve of the Six-Day War, with the attempt to strangle Israel. All this happened nearly 50 years before a single Israeli soldier went into Judea and Samaria.

confusing cause and effect.

That paragraph is a brilliant restatement of the obvious. Unfortunately, few people will comprehend it and take due notice.

To our joy, Egypt and Jordan left this circle of hostility. They signed peace agreements with us which ended their hostility to Israel. It brought about peace.

To our deep regret, this is not happening with the Palestinians. The closer we get to a peace agreement with them, the more they are distancing themselves from peace. They raise new demands. They are not showing us that they want to end the conflict.

they want to end the conflict

Sure they do! They reaffirm that fact every time they chant “from the river to the sea”.  They want victory, not peace!  Islam makes peace by conquering the world. Get a clue!!


A great many people are telling us that withdrawal is the key to peace with the Palestinians. But the fact is that all our withdrawals were met by huge waves of suicide bombers.

We tried withdrawal by agreement, withdrawal without an agreement, we tried partial withdrawal and full withdrawal. In 2000, and once again last year, the government of Israel, based on good will, tried a nearly complete withdrawal, in exchange for the end of the conflict, and were twice refused.

We withdrew from the Gaza Strip to the last centimeter, we uprooted dozens of settlements and turned thousands of Israelis out of their homes. In exchange, what we received were missiles raining down on our cities, our towns and our children. The argument that withdrawal would bring peace closer did not stand up to the test of reality.

withdrawal is the key to peace

Blessed right it is!  Not yours, theirs!! Israel can not make peace by withdrawing and the aggressors will never withdraw. If they would go home and stay there, without firing rockets and artillery, there would be peace. If you truly want peace, make them withdraw–all the way home–to Hell.


With Hamas in the south and Hizbullah in the north, they keep on saying that they want to ‘liberate’ Ashkelon in the south and Haifa and Tiberias.

Even the moderates among the Palestinians are not ready to say the most simplest things: The State of Israel is the national homeland of the Jewish People and will remain so. (Applause)

Friends, in order to achieve peace, we need courage and integrity on the part of the leaders of both sides. I am speaking today with courage and honesty. We need courage and sincerity not only on the Israeli side: we need the Palestinian leadership to rise and say, simply “We have had enough of this conflict. We recognize the right of the Jewish People to a state its own in this Land. We will live side by side in true peace.” I am looking forward to this moment.

We will live side by side in true peace

Don’t hold your breath waiting, its never going to happen.  The conflict continues until Judgment Day, when, according to their demonic prophecy, Jesus will return and lead them in killing the remaining Jews. Doubters & dissenters need to read and comprehend Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2526 Eternal Humiliation placed on the Jews.


We want them to say the simplest things, to our people and to their people. This will then open the door to solving other problems, no matter how difficult. The fundamental condition for ending the conflict is the public, binding and sincere Palestinian recognition of Israel as the national homeland of the Jewish People. (Applause)

fundamental condition

Victory is the fundamental condition; there is no other path to peace, it leads through the Muslim cometary. Allah has cursed Muslims should they ever abandon Jihad as a way of life. Doubters & dissenters should read Sunan Abu Dawud 23.3455 until they fully comprehend its meaning: Jihad is their religion!


For this to have practical meaning, we need a clear agreement to solve the Palestinian refugee problem outside of the borders of the State of Israel. For it is clear to all that the demand to settle the Palestinian refugees inside of Israel, contradicts the continued existence of the State of Israel as the state of the Jewish People. We must solve the problem of the Arab refugees. And I believe that it is possible to solve it. Because we have proven that we ourselves solved a similar problem. Tiny Israel took in the hundreds of thousands of Jewish refugees from Arab countries who were uprooted from their homes.

Therefore, justice and logic dictates that the problem of the Palestinian refugees must be solved outside the borders of the State of Israel. There is broad national agreement on this. (Applause)

I believe that with good will and international investment of we can solve this humanitarian problem once and for all.

with good will

Israeli good will ain’t sufficient; Muslim good will does not exist, its space is filled with Muslim hatred. The problem is insoluble for the duration of Islam’s existence.

Friends, up to now, I have been talking about the need for the Palestinians to ecognize our rights. Now I will talk about the need for us to recognize their rights.

The connection of the Jewish People to the Land has been in existence for more than 3,500 years. Judea and Samaria, the places where our forefathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob walked, our forefathers David, Solomon, Isaiah and Jeremiah – this is not a foreign land, this is the Land of our Forefathers. (Applause)

The right of the Jewish People to a state in the Land of Israel does not arise from the series of disasters that befell the Jewish People over 2,000 years — persecutions, expulsions, pogroms, blood libels, murders, which reached its climax in the Holocaust, an unprecedented tragedy in the history of nations. There are those who say that without the Holocaust the State would not have been established, but I say that if the State of Israel had been established in time, the Holocaust would not have taken place. (Applause) The tragedies that arose from the Jewish People’s helplessness show very sharply that we need a protective state.

The right to establish our sovereign state here, in the Land of Israel, arises from one simple fact: Eretz Israel is the birthplace of the Jewish People. (Applause)

As the first PM David Ben Gurion in the declaration of the State, the State of Israel was established here in Eretz Israel, where the People of Israel created the Book of Books, and gave it to the world.

But, friends, we must state the whole truth here. The truth is that in the area of our homeland, in the heart of our Jewish Homeland, now lives a large population of Palestinians. We do not want to rule over them. We do not want to run their lives. We do not want to force our flag and our culture on them. In my vision of peace, there are two free peoples living side by side in this small land, with good neighborly relations and mutual respect, each with its flag, anthem and government, with neither one threatening its neighbor’s security and existence.

In my vision of peace

Ain’t Bashir an Optometrist? Perhaps he can help you see straight.  The Falestinian state already exists, on 75% of Eretz Israel, its called Jordan. They neither need nor deserve another state anywhere.


These two facts – our link to the Land of Israel, and the Palestinian population who live here, have created deep disagreements within Israeli society. But the truth is that we have much more unity than disagreement.

I came here tonight to talk about the agreement and security that are broad consensus within Israeli society. This is what guides our policy. This policy must take into account the international situation. We have to recognize international agreements but also principles important to the State of Israel. I spoke tonight about the first principle – recognition. Palestinians must truly recognize Israel as the state of the Jewish people. The second principle is demilitarization. Any area in Palestinian hands has to be demilitarization, with solid security measures. Without this condition, there is a real fear that there will be an armed Palestinian state which will become a terrorist base against Israel, as happened in Gaza. We do not want missiles on Petah Tikva, or Grads on the Ben-Gurion international airport. We want peace. (Applause)

And, to ensure peace we don’t want them to bring in missiles or rockets or have an army, or control of airspace, or make treaties with countries like Iran, or Hizbullah. There is broad agreement on this in Israel. We cannot be expected to agree to a Palestinian state without ensuring that it is demilitarized. This is crucial to the existence of Israel – we must provide for our security needs.

This is why we are now asking our friends in the international community, headed by the USA, for what is necessary for our security, that in any peace agreement, the Palestinian area must be demilitarized. No army, no control of air space. Real effective measures to prevent arms coming in, not what’s going on now in Gaza. The Palestinians cannot make military treaties.

demilitarized

Does the PA have an army? Does it make military treaties? Does it have foreign military bases on its territory? Oh, yeah, how big an arsenal did Hamas have before you got pissed off last winter?  And exactly how will that change if you officially make them a nation state? Will statehood collapse the smuggling tunnels?   Nation states have sovereignty, you can’t stop them from having armies & negotiating treaties.  The essential conditions required for Israel’s security are impossibilities.


Without this, sooner or later, we will have another Hamastan. We can’t agree to this. Israel must govern its own fate and security. I told President Obama in Washington, if we get a guarantee of demilitarization, and if the Palestinians recognize Israel as the Jewish state, we are ready to agree to a real peace agreement, a demilitarized Palestinian state side by side with the Jewish state. (Applause)

Whenever we discuss a permanent arrangement, Israel needs defensible borders with Jerusalem remaining the united capital of Israel. (Applause)

The territorial issues will be discussed in a permanent agreement. Till then we have no intention to build new settlements or set aside land for new settlements. But there is a need to have people live normal lives and let mothers and fathers raise their children like everyone in the world. The settlers are not enemies of peace. They are our brothers and sisters. (Applause)

Friends, unity among us is, to my view, vital, and unity will help with reconciliation with our neighbors. Reconciliation must begin now. A strong Palestinian government will strengthen peace. If they truly want peace, and educate their children for peace and stop incitement, we for our part will make every effort, allow them freedom of movement and accessibility, making their lives easier and this will help bring peace.

If they truly want peace

They do not want peace, they want policide & genocide.  They also want martyrdom, the one thing you can give them.

stop incitement

Wasn’t that part of the Oslo Accords?  But they never stopped teaching their brats to hate Jews. They never stopped incitement in the Mosques,  or state run media, and they never will. They name events and institutions in honor of ‘martyrs’ who died trying to kill Jews. Get a clue!


But above all, they must decide: the Palestinians must decide between path of peace and path of Hamas. They must overcome Hamas. Israel will not sit down at conference table with terrorist who seek to destroy it. (Applause)

overcome Hamas

Hamas and Islam are synonymous. Read their Charter.  Where does it get its guidance? What does it consist of? What is its way of life? What is its goal? Who is its model? What is its constitution? What is its  path? What is its most sublime belief?  If you can’t answer those questions, or your answers do not match the clear statements of the charter, then you are an ignorant  fool.  If you won’t negotiate with terrorists who seek to destroy Israel, then you won’t negotiate with Muslims. Get a clue!!!

Hamas are not willing to even let the Red Cross visit our abducted soldier Gilad Shalit who has been in captivity three years, cut off from his family and his country. We want to bring him back whole and well.

With help of the international community, there is no reason why we can’t have peace. With help of USA, we can do we can do the unbelievable. In 61 years, with constant threats to our existence we have achieved so much. Our microchips power the worlds computers unbelievable, we have found cures for incurable diseases. Israeli drip irrigation waters barren lands throughout the world. Israeli researchers are making worldwide breakthroughs. If our neighbors only work for peace, we can achieve peace. (Applause)

why we can’t have peace

Because Islam exists you can never have peace!  Islam is permanent war. Get a clue!


I call upon Arab leaders and Palestinian leaders: Let’s go in the path of Menachem Begin and Anwar Sadat, Yitzhak Rabin and King Hussein. Let’s go in the path of Prophet Isaiah, who spoke thousands of years ago, they shall beat their swords into plowshares and know war no more.

Let us know war no more. Let us know peace.

When I heard radio news reports about the speech, I thought that Netanyahu had caved in and surrendered to allow Obama to sell Israel down the river. After reading the transcript, it is obvious that Netanyahu has clearly stated minimal conditions which Islam will never meet. The Muslims won’t be satisfied, nor will Obama.  Netanyahu will be subjected to extreme heat and pressure. I pray that he will find the strength to tell his enemies to go to Hell.

June 14, 2009 Posted by | GWOT | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

J. F’n Kerry Displays Racist Dishonesty


ABC News

Kerry: Obama Could Help US Relations with Muslim Nations ‘Because He’s a Black Man’

March 20, 2008 2:45 PM

In an interview with Massachusetts’ SouthCoastToday (watch it HERE), Obama-backing Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., says among other reasons he’s supporting Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, is his belief that “it would be such an affirmation of who we say we are as a people. if we could elect an African-American president, young leader, who is obviously visionary about the ability to inspire people.”

Asked about Obama’s credibility, Kerry said:

“Because he’s African-American. Because he’s a black man. Who has come from a place of oppression and repression through the years in our own country.”

Quotes from Rush Limbaugh’s transcript

It would give us an ability to talk to those countries, to, in some cases, go around their dictator leaders to the people and inspire the people in ways that we can’t otherwise.  I think in the end, um, he has an ability to help us bridge the divide of religious extremism, to maybe even give power to moderate Islam to be able to stand up against this radical misinterpretation of a legitimate religion.

Because he’s African-American!  Because he’s a black man who has come from a place of oppression and repression through the years in our own country.  His life story, you know, a Kenyan father who abandoned him and he was raised by a single parent and — and — and found the purpose and values to go to college and make something of himself.  That’s an important lesson for America to show Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and other places in the world where disenfranchised people don’t get anything.

  •  “in some cases go around their dictator leaders to the people and inspire the people in ways that we can’t otherwise.”

Is Senator Kerry really stupid enough to think that, because of his skin color, Barack Hussein Obama could hypnotize the Islamic street  so that they would quit supporting Jihad?  Alan Keys is blacker than Obama, could he do a better job of influencing the mobs?Do you recognize racism in Kerry’s interview?

  • he was raised by a single parent”  Yeah, right. His mother re-married, and he was later raised by his maternal grandparents.  
  • make something of himself”   Yeah, right. A Chicago politician.; just what the world needs more of.

March 21, 2008 Posted by | Uncategorized | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

   

%d bloggers like this: