Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

D Day 2013: Defeat Islam


 69 years ago, with Nazism controlling much of Europe,  courageous allies converged on the beaches to mount a surprise invasion which began the end of WWII in Europe.

With Western Europe and America under increasing and expanding occupation by the enemy forces of Islam, the time has come for a new generation to summon up its courage & greatness and save the world from an older threat widely ignored because it wears the false mantle of religion.

Like the Vichy French, Obamination and treacherous European leaders  co-operate with the invaders to subvert our sovereignty and subject us to slavery. We have no army, air force or navy; we have only our voices and keyboards; our fight is vocal and verbal: informing our countrymen of the fact that we are under siege.  Unlike our treacherous leaders, we correctly identify and characterize our enemy: normative Islam.  Not some imaginary distorted, perverted or hijacked extremism, but the real thing as preached & practiced by its founder: Muhammad 1400 years ago.

The modern Vichy are waging a vigorous campaign of denunciation and deceit; they seek to squelch our feeble warnings of clear & present danger. They announce that “Islam is a great religion of peace” with no connection to terrorism.  They tell us that the Boston Marathon Bombing was not an act of terrorism because it was not commissioned by Al-Qaeda.

They tell us that our exposure of Islamic doctrine & practice is “inflammatory”, that it incites violence, violating the ‘civil rights’  of  Muslims and subjecting us to criminal liability.

Nothing can be accomplished by individual acts of vigilantism, and those of who are reasonable do not advocate it.  We neither incite, suggest nor imply a need or desire for assaults on Muslims or vandalism against their property.  A few of us who do not make our livings by lecture fees & book royalties  openly demand effective government action to remove the fifth columns from our shores and exclude its members from entering.  We call for recognition of the fact that Islam is the enemy, not a legitimate religion and must be eradicated to make peace & security possible in the modern world.

In our legal system. truth is a defense against charges of slander.  In Shari’ah, it is not.

r2.2 Slander (ghiba) means to mention anything
concerning a person that he would dislike,
whether about his body,. religion, everyday life,
self, disposition, property, son, father, wife, servant,
turban, garment, gait, movements, smiling,
dissoluteness, frowning, cheerfulness, or anything
else connected with him.
[The Reliance of the Traveller, pg.  730.]


In Shari’ah, a conquered Christian forfeits his life for reviling Allah, Moe and or Islam.  But in America, we have a First Amendment which protects us when we speak and write the truth.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


Are anonymous, unelected bureaucrats empowered to do that which is prohibited to Congress: to abridge the right of free speech & press and the right to petition for redress of grievances?  The answer is obvious on the face of the text. The Department of Justice is not allowed to impose injustice u0on us in the form of Shari’ah.

Am I a hypocrite for petitioning the government to outlaw Islam and  expel & exclude its adherents?  No! Islam is a continuing criminal enterprise; a war against humanity, not a legitimate religion.  You assume that Islam is a religion because it is couched in religious terms and claims divine sanction for its depredations.  You assume that, because ‘it is a religion’ it must be anodyne & beneficent; it ain’t. Islam’s mission is mercenary and its method is martial.

Moe was a profiteer, not a Prophet of God.  He heard sounds and saw lights; he feared that he was going mad.  Perceiving that he wrestled the devil, he contemplated suicide.   He ‘revealed’ situational scripture casting divine sanction about his sexual proclivities. He imputed to Allah words that came from Satan.

Moe was motivated by lust for loot; Allah is motivated by blood lust. These fatal facts are disclosed in the Qur’an’s Surah Al-Anfal 8:67.A Prophet is not permitted to hold prisoners for ransom until he has made a great slaughter.  Does it really mean that? See for yourself, broken down word by word. Consult Tafsir Ibn Kathir, tooDid Moe really do that? To the Banu Qurayza? Is it in the Qur’an?

Moe said that he was raised for Jihad, not for tillage.     He said that he got his income by his spear, disgracing and humiliating his opponents and that he was sent with a sword to see that only Allah is worshiped.

Moe dictated extortion letters to his scribes and dispatched them to rulers in the region by private courier.  Would a genuine Prophet of God send extortion letters?

Of course, American Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism, perish the thought.  But one of the Boston Bombers is a naturalized citizen; he has admitted that he participated in terrorism motivated by Islamic doctrine. The sad facts:

  1. terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam
  2. Moe practiced and bragged about it
  3. Allah said that he would and did cast terror
  4. Allah commanded Muslims to engage in it
  5. Allah promised great reward for performing it.

Here is the evidence: from the Qur’an & hadith.   3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

Of course Muslims neither believe nor practice that. So they are going to Hell! Surah Al Baqarah 2:85 declares Islam to be an all or nothing, package deal with no selectivity allowed. 9:38-39, linked in the paragraph above, threaten Muslims with Hellfire if they do not participate in Jihad.  A Muslim who neither goes to war nor supports it financially meets with a sudden calamity. Get a clue for Chrissake!

Let us therefore resolve that this day: June 6, 2013 will be the first day of a renewed Crusade to remove Islam from our shores entirely and eventually make the world an Islam free zone.  Click the links in this blog post; read the relevant factual evidence, evaluate it and propagate it.  Let no eye remain blind nor ear deaf to the fatal facts which condemn Islam.

June 6, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Political Correctness | , , , , | 5 Comments

Islam Demands Censorship!!!


Thanks and a tip of the hat to Creeping Shariah for the tip off.  A search for transcripts proved fruitless. It appears that the Daily Caller is the root source for the crucial quotes.  The Justice Department met with Islamicists to discuss discrimination: “Confronting Discrimination in the Post-9/11 Era: Challenges and Opportunities Ten Years Later”

to redefine criticism as discrimination, said Sahar Aziz,

Read more:

The word “Muslim,” she said, “has become racialized. … I don’t accept this formalistic cop-out that this is all about religion.”

Read more:

Aziz’s advocacy was supported by a second Islamist advocate, Islamic Society of North America president Mohamed Magid. He argued that “teaching people that all Muslims are a threat to the country… is against the law and the Constitution.”

 

“redefine criticism as discrimination”

A Muslim law professor expressed confidence that the sharp DOJ lawyers can redefine criticism of Islam as discrimination to make it illegal.  The familiar context of discrimination is “whites only”, excluding racial minorities from public accommodations.

“formalistic cop-out that this is all about religion”

Your race; skin color & physiognomy ain’t at issue; neither is religion. The issue is adherence to a set of doctrines which inculcate hatred of and incite violence against all non-Muslims.  The redefinition concept is neither original nor an empty threat. The UN has already proclaimed it.

The following quote is from Preliminary document of the African Regional Conference Preparatory to the Durban Review Conference  [Emphasis added.] 4.  Emphasizes the urgent need to address the scourges of anti-Semitism, Christianophobia, and Islamophobia as contemporary forms of racism as well as racial and violent movements based on racism and discriminatory ideas directed at African, Arab, Christian, Jewish, Muslim and other communities;

 

“teaching people that all Muslims are a threat to the country”

All Islamic believers are threats to the country. This is because they are obligated to participate in global conquest. I refer doubters & dissenters to the all purpose handbook of Shafi’ite fiqh aka Shari’ah: Reliance of the Traveller.

O9.1: The Obligatory Character of Jihad

Jihad is a communal obligation (def: c3.2).  When enough people perform it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon others (O: the evidence for which is the Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

“He who provides the equipment for a soldier in jihad has himself performed jihad,”

and Allah Most High having said:

“Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah’s path with their property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to each, Allah has promised great good” (Koran 4:95).

If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.

The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year.

The second state is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim country or near to one, in which case jihad is personally obligatory (def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants of that country, who must repel the non-Muslims with whatever they can).

All Muslims are potential threats.

Secular o in name only Muslims can ‘get religion’ and become believers without warning.  Islamic hate literature, web sites, clerics and friends may convince a secular Muslim of the validity of Allah; his jihad imperative, threat and promise.

When someone believes that his eternal destiny: paradise or the fire is dependent on his participation in genocidal conquest, what will he do?  Once their numbers are sufficient to confer a degree of  impunity, they will obey Allah, emulate Moe, and attack the disbelievers nearest them.

But they aren’t all attacking us.

Did every Muslim participate directly in the conquests of Arabia, Egypt, Syria & India?   Islamic conquest is fard al-kifaya, binding on all until a sufficient number have responded, not fard ayn.  Read Reliance O9.1 again.  Muslims are obligated to join the jihad when called.

criticism of Islam: illegal

How is it possible that revealing these fatal facts about Islam is “discrimination” and “against the Constitution”?  Only when we are intimidated or conquered!
When Muslims conquer dar ul-harb,  Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians living in the former domain of war are subjected to Islamic law.  Reliance of the Traveller, O11.10 lists five acts which break the contract of dhimmitude, subjecting the violator to the death penalty.

-5- or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.

What is “impermissible to mention” ? Reliance O8.7 lists 20 acts which entail apostasy. Here are the most relevant items from that list.

-4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace);
-5- to deny the existence of Allah, His beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: v1);

-6- to be sarcastic about Allah’s name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;

-7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;

-15- to hold that any of Allah’s messengers or prophets are liars, or to deny their being sent;

-16- to revile the religion of Islam;

-19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law;

-20- or to deny that Allah intended the Prophet’s message (Allah bless him and give him peace) to be the religion followed by the entire world (dis: w4.3-4) (al-Hadiyya al-`Ala’iyya (y4), 423-24). )

Reviling Islam, Allah or Moe gets one killed; any and all criticism of Islam is fatal under Islamic law. That is what they are seeking to subject us to.  The purpose is to render us defenseless against demographic subversion & militant jihad alike.  This is akin to outlawing criticism of Nazism during  WW2.

October 24, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , | Leave a comment

   

%d bloggers like this: