Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Pat Condell Blasts Shari’ah


Once again, Barenaked Islam got there first, embedding this video.   I am going to add  some value by transcribing the video so that you can have another chance to savor and  absorb some truth.  I will also add some commentary.

While run time is less than seven minutes, Pat packs in a log of words. It appears to me that he needed to stop to take a breath but pressed on regardless because of the importance of his message.  Transcribing this took about two hours.  That investment of time will be worth while if anyone reads and heeds Pat’s wisdom.

http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2010/07/18/pat-condell-sharia-in-the-west-is-like-urine-in-a-water-hole/#comment-40151

You know, it always amazes me how many people. in the west would happily compromise the foundations of our entire civilization to appease religious fascism.    I find it disturbing that they would care so little about their children’s future, even if they are too complacent or naive or politically blinkered to care about their own.

I have a problem with one phrase: “religious fascism”.  Fascism is  an authoritarian form of government. Islam is a deen: way of life which conflates the spiritual and temporal into one tyrannical regime.  Islam  has a religious component which is secondary, not primary.  Islam is primarily a war cult preying upon the rest of the human race.

And one of the most depressing questions I get asked by people like this is “Why do you hate Muslims?”.  Its depressing because anyone who has seen my videos knows very well that I’ve never expressed hatred for anyone. Hate is for losers, we all know that, because its self-destructive–we do all know that–don’t we?

Now, its often claimed that many people in the west are converting to Islam and its true that some are but its also  true that many Muslims in the west are leaving Islam but you don’t hear so much about them for obvious reasons.

Some of them have been brave enough to make themselves known and reach out to help other Muslims who want to escape the tyranny of their religion.  And, like them, its the religion that I  have a problem with, not the people. So, no, I don’t hate Muslims, thanks for asking; I wish them well, even the fanatics who stand at the roadside with their dopey little banners and bulging eyeballs calling for death to the west; I even wish those boneheads well in that I wish them good mental health if that isn’t too wildly optimistic.

I believe it is very over optimistic to wish those boneheads good mental health. Their insanity is  obvious even to the untrained observer.

And, of course I know that there are lots of moderate peaceful Muslims indeed, many of them are so moderate and peaceful — they’re invisible and silent and thats part of the problem.

Islam is neither moderate nor peaceful, it is literal, absolute, intolerant and violent, all by design. Muslims who do not fit that mold are termed hypocrites, whose Islam does not reach beyond their throats.  They are to be killed and gathered together with us–into Hell.

And, just because there are lots of peaceful Muslims, it doesn’t mean that the religion itself is not an aggressive fascist ideology that threatens all our freedom nor does it mean that western governments aren’t falling all over themselves to make excuses for it; pretending that Islam has nothing to do with the violence inspired and sanctioned by its scripture and repeatedly carried out in its name.

There are three critical ideas: only Allah has the right to be worshiped, only Allah has the right to rule and Muslims are obligated to enforce those rights. “violence inspired and sanctioned”? No! commanded! 8:39, 9:29 & 9:127 are commandments, not suggestions. The violence is how Muslims enforce Allah’s rights.

Just look at the craven behavior that allowed the massacre at Fort Hood to take place–we know it could have been prevented– but thanks to   political correctness in the American Army–the American Army– all the warning signs were ignored in case somebody  got offended.  All reference to Islam has been airbrushed out of the official Pentagon  report even though the guy handed out copies of the Qur’an beforehand and shouted “Allahu Akhbar” as he carried out the murders.
I’m surprised the officers who charged him haven’t been charged with Islamophobia; maybe they will be at the trial when we find out what a victim he is and how living in a decadent country like America–his religion is the only thing keeping him sane.

Pat said it, and said it with super clarity.  I can’t add anything more than “Amen”.

All over the western world we’ve given Islamic supremacists the impression that they have every right to be outraged, insulted and offended by everything  we do and say.  And some of us have come to believe it ourselves, and that is the real core of this problem.

Our schools don’t teach our history accurately, they emphasize the negative aspects and deprecate the positive aspects.  As a result, we have lost knowledge of  the superiority of western civilization.

Mark Twain said that “Faith is believing what you know ain’t so.”   Well, political correctness is doing what you know ain’t right.

In every western country,  Islamic  extremists are allowed to exploit religious privilege for political ends by claiming to represent all Muslims and the media always treats them as if they do.

When you represent Islam, you represent Muslims. Islam is what Moe said and did, as codified in the Qur’an, Sira & hadith.  Islam is nothing else; nothing else is Islam.

These groups give themselves official sounding titles and talk a smooth line in community harmony while doing all they can to prevent integration–to keep Muslims apart and ghettoized in a separate society with a separate identity,  separate rules and standards–in other words, they exist to  cause division in society, to drive a wedge between communities that doesn’t need to be there any more than they need to exist as organizations.

They exist for the purpose of conquering us, by out breeding us, deceit, subversion  & intimidation if possible, by  war if necessary.

Take, for example, the Council on American  Islamic Relations, thats quite a puffed up, important sounding title, that implies equal ideologies–equal points of view that need to find a common ground–when, in fact, all that’s needed is for Muslim immigrants to adapt to the American way of life or to British or Australian or Canadian way of life or not to go there; to respect the laws and customs like everyone else, not to try to change them to Islamic ones.

And not to define themselves as a separate group deserving special status.  That’s where it begins and ends, there is no debate, there is no  common ground to find, there is no American Islamic relations and there is no  need for any self-appointed council of  Shari’ah advocating, Hamas linked religious fascists to oversee it.

Those two sentences are a gold mine of wisdom; read them repeatedly and absorb them completely.

Shari’ah in the west is like urine in a water hole: any amount is too much. Shari’ah dehumanizes women, it threatens the freedom and the dignity of every woman in the western world.  It discriminates  in such a fundamental way there’s no way around it, there’s no compromise.

Misogyny runs through it like a dye and that should be more than enough reason for us to banish it as aggressively and thoroughly as we banish rabies.

Pat, would you believe that Allah’s Messenger has a contrary opinion about water pollution?

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 1, Number 0067:
Narrated AbuSa’id al-Khudri:

I heard that the people asked the Prophet of Allah (peace_be_upon_him): Water is brought for you from the well of Buda’ah. It is a well in which dead dogs, menstrual clothes and excrement of people are thrown. The Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) replied: Verily water is pure and is not defiled by anything.

If you live in the United States, and especially if you’ve ever accused anyone of Islamophobia, I urge you to read this book: Muslim Mafia If you read only one book this year or only one book in your whole life, make it this one for your sake and for the sake of your children, especially the female ones.

This book is the result of an undercover investigation that reveals the bare knuckle truth about CAIR. the Muslim Brotherhood, and the extensive network of Islamic fanatics who’ve eaten their way into American society like termites and seek to undermine it and destroy it from within.

It provides substantial documentary proof that Islamists have penetrated the highest levels of American politics and law enforcement in their quest to impose Shari’ah on the United States and get rid of the Constitution.

Aided and abetted by the most cowardly and shameful political correctness in government, in the media and especially within the FBI who seem to think its more important to be culturally sensitive than to defend national security.  This is an important book, which is why the American media has so assiduously ignored it.  In publishing it, the authors have done more for their country and for the civilized world than all the politicians on Capital Hill combined will have achieved in their entire careers.

Political Islam is a threat to all civilized people.  Muslims, Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, Atheists, Buddhists and especially Jews. If America falls, we all do, so, wherever you live in the world, if you care about freedom,  read this book and read it soon.   Peace.

July 18, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , | 2 Comments

Islamophobia: the CAIR Sampler


Barenaked Islam posted a CAIR video featuring  audio clips critical of Islam, labeling them Islamophobia.  Barenaked Islam exploits the definition of Islamophobia.

It isn’t Islamophobia when they really ARE trying to kill you.

Phobia means irrational fear.  Since the death of thousands nearly nine years ago,  we know that fear of Islam is rational.

Those who have sampled Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition, biography, exegesis and jurisprudence know that revulsion is a rational reaction to Islamic doctrine & practice.


The video is entitled “Islamophobia A growing problem”.   What is problematic?  A slowly growing segment of our society is becoming aware of Islam, the hatred it inculcates and the violence it sanctifies  and incites.

CAIR does not want us to know that Islam is intrinsically violent; that it has declared and is prosecuting  war and subversion against us.

The unspoken subtext is “Islamophobia” breeds intolerance, contempt and assault”.   Intolerance of the intolerable is a good thing.  Islam can not be tolerated because it is intolerant, supremacist and genocidally aggressive.

Knowing the truth about Islam and Muslims, awareness of the fact that we need to get rid of them does not imply assault, murder or arson.   Those acts are crimes in our society, and  offenders are prosecuted.    Reasonable people are not advocating murdering Muslims or bombing Mosques.  We  advocate outlawing Islam, closing the Mosques and deporting the Muslims for our protection and the preservation of our way of life.

The video begins with a clip from a Dan Fanelli  campaign spot.  The narrator says “Rising Islamophobia in our nation endangers the rights of  American Muslims and creates unjustified fear and hostility towards Islam.”

What rights are endangered?  How are they endangered?  Is there a right not to be recognized as a threat to our system of government and way of life?

Able bodied adult male Muslims who are not indebted nor enslaved are bound by a “religious obligation” classified as fard al-kifaya, to engage in attacks against nearby disbelievers.  That obligation is specified in Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.1.

The second segment begins with this heading “U.S. Senator James Inhofe advocating profiling of Middle Eastern men when speaking at a Senate hearing. ”

The clip shows the Senator saying “I believe in racial and ethnic profiling.”

CAIR is attacking common sense.  All of the recent Islamic terror attacks were perpetrated by young Muslim males.   Anyone not suspicious of young men from areas of the world where Islam predominates  is several cards short of a full deck.

When it comes to Islamic terrorism, Muslims are the natural prime suspects.  Lets solve this problem by excluding all Muslims from all mass transit.

Congresswoman Sue Myrick is up next  “there are people who literally are willing to blow themselves up like this guy did–to commit jihad because they believe in a bigger cause and that cause is what they want to do to us: they want to destroy western democracies, they want to bring down America, they want us to live by their rules.”

CAIR’s  objection to her honest statement of fact speaks volumes about CAIR and about Islam.

Next we are treated to a sign, outside the Dove World Church, which says “Islam is of the devil.”.  The narrator says “Anti-Islam rhetoric has become more explicit and more extreme since the 9/11 attacks.”

No mention of relevance or veracity, just how explicit and extreme it is.  We are to assume that Islam and Christianity share a common deity since both are monotheistic. If there is only one deity, they must be the same.  But “God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son…”. Contrast that with Allah, who rubbed Adam’s shoulders to produce one group of people for the fire and another for Paradise.  In Surah al-Anfal 67, Allah told Moe that he could not hold captives for ransom until he had “made a great slaughter”. He said Moe wanted booty, but Allah wanted to get Moe into Paradise.  Does the Christian God require genocide?   If  the Dove World Church believes and wants to tell the world that Allah is demonic, that is their right, ain’t it?

Next we have Congressman Peter King saying “Unfortunately, we have too many Mosques in this country, there is too many people sympathetic to radical Islam, we should be looking at them more carefully. ”

I view that as a rare episode of candor, of which we need more, not less.   CAIR views it as “Islamophobia”.

The narrator says “anti-Islam views  expressed by elected officials, can severely impact the ability of American Muslims to engage in the positive civic participation  that is every American’s right.”.  That statement comes over the image of Geert Wilders speaking at an American synagogue.

“Admit that Islam is not a religion, admit that Islam is a totalitarian ideology, in other words, the rights to religious freedom do not apply to the totalitarian ideology called Islam.”

That is a pretty tough admission to make, and, to  the best of my knowledge, no American elected officials have made it.

The fact is that Islam is not a religion; it is a way of life: intra-species predation.  Islam’s religious component serves as a control mechanism to motivate Muslims to go to war and as a camouflage to prevent us from recognizing it as a predator.

The caption for the next segment  is “Right-wing commentator Ann Coulter”.  She says: “I said we are at war with all these fanatics and we should invade their countries, kill their leaders  and convert them to Christianity.”.

Ann just told you why we are losing in Afghanistan & Iraq: they are still Muslim.  That is a fatal fact, too hot for most to suggest, far to hot for politicians to state explicitly.

Next up: “Christian televangelist Pat Robertson”, who cuts loose with this classic remark.  “…then if the religion involves beheading infidels and pouring boiling oil down their throats”….

Islam is not a religion, but it does involve beheading infidels, as we saw in the case of Nick Berg and others.  The boiling oil comes later, after we arrive in the Hell fire.  But the decapitation is commanded in Surah al-anfal 12.

Pastor Rod Parsley is up next. “Islam is an anti-Christ religion that intends through violence to conquer the world.”

Horrible! Pastor Parsley confused deen with religion, which is only part of the deen.  We see Islamic advertisements that claim Jesus Christ as a “Prophet of Islam”.  But those advertisements do not tell us that, according to their scripture, Jesus was not crucified, did not die and was not resurrected.  Nor do they tell us that he will return to lead the Muslims in battle and the final genocide against us.   Lying is as much by what they conceal as what they dissemble.

Franklin Gaham is up next. “True Islam can not be practiced in this country. You can’t beat your wife,  you cannot murder your children if you think they have committed adultery or something like that, which they do practice in some…”

True, Islam does permit wife beating and honoricide. It also permits having as many as four wives at once.  It permits a Muslim to divorce his wife by saying “I divorce you” three times.   All of those things are contrary to American law.

Next up, saving the best for next to last, we have Pamela Geller, among signs endorsing liberty, memorializing the slain  and condemning Codoba House,  telling it as it is.

“This is an insult, it is demeaning, this is humiliating, that you would build a shrine to the very ideology that inspired the attacks of 9/11”.

Geller is followed by a man I do not recognize saying “This house of evil will be the birthplace of the next terrorist event.”

Perhaps, but the plot could, and likely will be hatched somewhere else. But the fact remains, that in every Mosque, Jews and Christians are cursed five times  every day when they recite the first Surah of the Qur’an as part of  their prayers.  Fifteen Muslims died in a Mosque in Afghanistan when the bomb they were building detonated prematurely.

Our narrator returns.  “Whether it is anti-Muslim commentators, extremist religious leaders,  Muslim bashing politicians or fear mongering dvds sent to millions of American homes, Islam and the American Muslim community are being targeted by hate and intolerance.  But with your help, Islamophobia can be challenged and overcome through education and understanding.  ”

The wise gentlemen who founded this nation gave us something most of the world lacks: the right of free inquiry and expression.  we are free to  investigate institutions and issues; free to share what we learn.  Our founders knew that the right to accurate criticism of government policy and candidates for office is an absolute requirement for the preservation of liberty.  If we can not identify threats to our liberty  and accurately describe them, we can not preserve liberty.

Islam presents a clear, proximate & persistent threat to our liberty.  Islam, through the offices of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, seeks to criminalize all criticism of Islam.    Islamic law forbids, under penalty of death, the reviling of Allah, Moe & Islam.  If you are a conquered Christian living in Egypt or Pakistan, any negative statement ab out Islam, true or not, gets you tortured and killed.

Every year, they ram “defamation of religion” resolutions through the UNHRC & General Assembly.   Those resolutions specifically condemn and demand the criminalization of all association of Islam & terrorism.  Casting terror is sanctified by 3:151 and  commanded by 8:12.  It is exemplified by 33:26-27.  Moe bragged about it, as recorded in Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220.   If they get their way, they’ll be able to fine me and throw me in prison for publishing this fatal fact.

In November, the Ad Hoc Committee for the Elaboration of Contemporary Standards will meet again to formulate their proposed protocol to ICERD. The protocol will have the force of law, trumping the First Amendment.  We absolutely must stop those fiends from stifling free speech!  We must rise up as one, disrespectfully demanding the preservation of our hard won rights.  Once lost, recovering those rights will be a difficult, bloody, costly and probably impossible quest.

It is a little know fact that unenforced provisions of ICERD, ICCPR & \CPPCG require that Islam be proscribed by law.   We need to obtain enforcement of those human rights covenants before Islam can  modify them to use against us.   We have one instrument we can use:

International Qur’an Petition

For the love of liberty, sign that petition, copy it, paste it into an email and send it to everyone you can influence. Urge the recipients to sign and forward it. Make it go viral.  Put a link to it on your blog or web site.   If you won’t do that, you don’t value your life and liberty enough to deserve them.

It was not without good reason that Moe warned his companions not to carry the Qur’an into Dar ul-harb .

Malik’s Muwatta Book 21, Number 21.2.7:
Yahya related to me from Malik from Nafi that Abdullah ibn Umar said that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, forbade travelling with a Qur’an in the land of the enemy. Malik commented, “That is out of fear that the enemy will get hold of it.”

They need to make it illegal to criticize Islam.  We need to stop them.
What’s Wrong With Islam/Muslims.chm contains what you need to know about Islam, the documentation of the facts revealed above.

July 10, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , , | 7 Comments

CAIR: Inconsistency


Dan Fanelli ran two humorous and dramatic campaign spots  for the Republican nomination in  Florida’s 8th District.  CAIR immediately reacted with a press release and a video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McICacLSk6w&feature=player_embedded

Rick Barber, running in Alabama’s 2nd district,  created an ad about the Cordoba House  project. Barber let it all hang out.

  • “we were attacked by Islamic jihadists”
  • “in the name of Islam nearly 3000 Americans have been murdered”
  • “Jihad threatens our freedom, our families and our way of life.”
  • “Under the name of Islam, American soldiers and civilians have been tortured and murdered”
  • “Islamic jihadism poses a clear and present danger”
  • “there is a difference between tolerance and surrender”
  • recognize the enemy, call them by name and stand up against them”

After nearly a month, CAIR remains silent.  Why  is CAIR ignoring Barber’s explicit statements after blasting  Fanelli’s innocuous skits?  Is it because what Rick Barber said is true and impossible to refute?  Or  is CAIR afraid that criticizing Barber would  give publicity to his run off campaign for the  Republican  nomination?  Perhaps the law of multiple causation applies.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwCa-1MQ9V4&feature=player_embedded

June 21, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , | Leave a comment

Islamophobia


CAIR Video: One Man’s Fight Against Islamophobia
CAIR’s National Executive Director, Nihad Awad was interviewed by Dan Harris of ABC News April 20, ’10, stemming from CAIR’s objection to an interview with Wafa Sultan.  I found this eight minute, 55 second video at Bare Naked Islam.

The video begins with  brief excerpts from a speech and interview with Wafa Sultan. I suspect that the excerpts come from the Freedom Defense Initiative  at CPAC in March. Video from that interview  was found at Atlas Shrugs.  The video confirmed  my suspicion. Of course, the only “islamophobia” in the video was in brief  cuts from her appearances on Al Jazeera.
I hope to select and transcribe the most egregious lies from Nihad Awad’s interview.  Do not assume that my transcription is word for word perfect, my hearing is poor, Awad speaks softly, and my computer’s sound card is weak.

Wafa Sultan was shown telling FDI that “We must deal with the evil of Islam right now” so that our children won’t have to deal with it…”so that the next generation can live in peace”.  Harris wanted to know what bothered Awad about that interview. .

“From the beginning we strongly believe in free speech. People are entitled to their opinions no matter how wrong they are. But when a person of this nature is interviewed and not challenged; is not opposed or there is no balance in  the presentation, you feel that something was missing and that the racist remarks she made and allegations that she made against Muslims as a whole defies logic–defies common sense and basic knowledge… people learn about Islam–they know about Islam–she just reinforces stereotypes and  mis-information and she was not challenged.”

Islam does not believe in free speech.  Islam forbids denial, questioning, sarcasm & reviling Allah, his messenger, the Qur’an and the doctrines derived from it.
Mentioning anything “impermissible”  about Islam is one of the violations of dhimma which can cause a dhimmi to lose his protection from Muslims and be killed. The list of attitudes and acts entailing apostasy is documented here;  the list of acts prohibited to dhimmis is documented here.

There was nothing inflammatory in the brief interview with Wafa Sultan. The closest she came to “Islamophobia” was in the clip from her speech at FDI when she mentioned “the evil of Islam”.  There wasn’t anything concrete to counter in that interview, which lacked ideological detail.

The allegation of racist remarks is absolutely unfounded.  Sultan explicitly stated that her opposition was to Islam, not to Muslims. Islam is not a race; it has enslaved and victimized people of several races.  What  allegations did she make “against Muslims as a whole”?  She said that Islam is evil, and it is.  Islam  is violent, ordaining warfare, praising self sacrifice in battle against disbelievers as the best deed. Allah sanctifies terrorism and demands genocide. Islam declared war, permanent war,  until the entire world is conquered.

Asked about intolerance, of which Islam is accused,  Awad replied:

” That is just dead wrong, because Islamic history shows different than what people claim and the Qur’an…the best answer is from the Qur’an, otherwise, if you hear from someone as he would say… trying to spin the issue… the Qur’an emphasizes freedom, freedom of thought and religion…’let there be no compulsion in religion’ this comes direct from the Qur’an, nobody can misunderstand it, nobody can misinterpret it.  You can not force people to believe and act … these are the words in the Qur’an. “

Islamic history shows extreme intolerance. I refer to the Pact of  Umar. Hitler did not invent distinctive clothing for Jews, he adopted it from Islam. 3:85 clearly declares that choosing a religion other than Islam will never be accepted. Muslims are instructed, when encountering Jews & Christians on the road, not to gree them first and to shove them into the ditch.  Doubt me? Then look it up: Sunan Abu Dawud 41.5186.

“No compulsion…” comes from 2:256. 3:110 declares believing Muslims to be the “best of peoples”; the meaning of that verse is explained in Sahih Bukhari 6.60.80 : ” means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam. “.

Asked about the treatment of women in KSA, for example:

” You have to differentiate between culture and religion and sometimes there is a big difference between the two. My understanding of my faith … women are not only protected but they can be leaders in the Muslim World, when you look at Pakistan, Turkey and Bangladesh, they can be leaders in the Muslim world. “

Awad is playing a subtle semantic game.  Islam is not a religion, it is a deen: way of life.  It encompasses all aspects of human activity, culture included.  Women are chattel  property, “tilth“, literally a field to be plowed and seeded. They are inferior to men, deemed deficient. Moe had something pertinent to say about female rulers : When Allah’s Apostle was informed that the Persians had crowned the daughter of Khosrau as their ruler, he said, “Such people as ruled by a lady will never be successful.”

Asked about the aftermath of 9-11; Islamophobia :

“Our job is getting more difficult every day although we see a new tone in the  new administration, we see a hand extended to the Muslim world, …we see a positive speech toward Muslims and a tone of reconciliation; but I believe the situation overall is getting worse. Islamophobia  is being accelerated in the United States, I haven’t seen clergy or political leader who stands up and pushes against bigotry against Muslims. “

“Islamophobia” implies irrational fear and loathing of Islam.  After 9-11, considering the untimely deaths of approximately 270*106 people in the last 1400 years, fear and loathing of Islam is not irrational. Muslims label well documented blog posts such as this “Islamophobia”.

If the media were more responsible, and our leaders were better, isn’t your job made more difficult by the identity of the terrorists …

“Its important to recognize that the majority of Muslims and organizations including ours, leaders and clergy in the United States and around the world have condemned 9-11 and I believe we were the first organization on the face of the earth to condemn 9-11 but months and years after that we are always confronted on some national television show: ‘where are the moderate Muslims–where is the condemnation’ and we say we did, but who is listening? Which national network has displayed or communicated or shown our condemnation?  I think our voices are somehow excluded and ignored because as we say ‘if it bleeds, it leads’ .  Maybe our statements are not amusing to the ear of people who are accustomed to seeing violence on television but they do not see Muslim leaders coming to condemn this violence.  We are condemning the violence, but we do not want to be defined by condemning violence.  There are seven million Muslims  in the United States.  There are engineers, doctors, public servants, educators,  they do great work to make America better every day; I’d like to see stories about these people …  I do not want to see my faith, which has been hijacked by a very tiny minority in the world, to be defined by their acts while the majority of us are having to stand up and condemn the acts of the few. “

So they condemned the attack on the World Trade Center. Wonderful, now we should form a circle, hold hands and sing Kumbaya.  Yeah, right.  Malicious malarkey!  They condemn attacks on “innocents”; another semantic game tactic.  Only Muslims can be innocent.  Anyone who is not Muslim is a rebel against Allah, who deserves to be killed.  5:33 prescribes hudud for those who “wage war against Allah”.  That expression is defined in Ibn Kathir’s tafsir of that verse:

“`Wage war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. “.

Take note of the word I highlighted in that definition; disbelief = waging war against Allah.  They will not denounce, condemn and abjure the damnable doctrines which sanctify and mandate offensive conquest, genocide & terrorism because that would be an act entailing apostasy.

Seven minutes and forty eight seconds into the interview, Awad tells the big lie: ” I do not want to see my faith, which has been hijacked by a very tiny minority in the world, to be defined by their acts while the majority of us are having to stand up and condemn the acts of the few. ”

Islam has not been hijacked. As previously documented, casting terror is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam and offensive conquest is a permanent mandate, in the course of which genocide must be performed.  The founder of Islam was a terrorist.  Have you read the Qur’an?  Try 33:26-27.  Even if you never read another hadith, read Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220.

Eight minutes and twelve seconds into the interview,  asked if he gets threats, Awad answers in the affirmative, during which statement, he is framed in the camera’s viewfinder as if to simulate the view through an assassin’s telescopic rifle sight.  he says that when he speaks sincerely, from his heart people listen and believe him.   Those must be rare occasions, rare indeed.

April 23, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , | Leave a comment

Petition for Investigation of CAIR


Act! for America is calling on Congress to open an official investigation of CAIR in the wake of their designation as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation case and the   publication of Muslim Mafia.

We Call on the U.S. Government to Conduct an Immediate and Thorough Investigation into the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in the Interest of National Security

We are GREATLY CONCERNED about past and ongoing activities by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), and look to our U.S. Government to immediately commence a thorough investigation into the organization, including its leadership, affiliates and activities. We REMIND our elected officials that CAIR has documented ties to the terrorist organization Hamas and that CAIR was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial (a trial that ended with guilty verdicts on 108 counts of funneling $12 million to Hamas).

We REMIND our elected officials that CAIR has individuals either under its current or former employ, or as its affiliates, who have direct ties to terrorism both in the U.S. and abroad: such as Nihad Awad, CAIR’s current national executive director, who participated in a meeting about how to disguise payments to Hamas terrorists as charity; Abdurahman Alamoudi, a CAIR director who is now serving 23 years in federal prison for plotting terrorism; and Omar M. Ahmad, CAIR’s founder and former chairman, who was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land case, to name but a few examples.

We are deeply CONCERNED at recent reports that CAIR has worked to undermine U.S. law enforcement by tipping off suspected terrorists under investigation, and by directing Muslim-Americans to not cooperate with the F.B.I.

We are DISMAYED that, despite these facts, CAIR continues to be the primary group consulted by both media and government agencies with regard to the Muslim-American community.

In the name of true transparency, therefore, we REQUEST that Congress and the Administration support the following investigative actions:

  • The U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE share with each member of the U.S. Congress an executive summary of the findings that led them to name CAIR as a co-conspirator in a terrorism case.
  • The House Sergeant at Arms work with all Members of Congress and their top staff, particularly those Members who sit on the House Judiciary, Homeland Security, and Intelligence Committees, to perform background checks on staff under their employ, considering evidence that CAIR has strategically worked to place staffers there.
  • The U.S. Internal Revenue Service perform a full and thorough investigation into the business activities of CAIR, specifically their lobbying activities, to judge if they are in violation of their federal non-profit status as a 501c3 organization.

Further, we REJECT all attempts by CAIR to discredit those who call for a formal investigation into their organization by falsely arguing such action is “anti-Muslim.” This has been an oft-used distraction tactic of theirs, and it is time it came to an end. This issue is about CAIR and only CAIR. We REMIND our elected officials that their primary responsibility to our nation’s citizens is to PROTECT AND DEFEND, and we therefore URGE them to take immediate action on this matter.

Please click this link to join the 28,249  who have already signed the petition. Share this information with everyone you can hope to influence.    Members of the anti-terror caucus need evidence of massive public support in order to overcome the prevailing PC prejudice and get the ball rolling in Congress.   Its up to us. If not us, who?  If not now, when?

November 21, 2009 Posted by | CAIR | , | Leave a comment

Rhetoric/Incidents: Islam’s Hypocrisy


In the context of  seeking hate crime prosecution in a Californian assault case, CAIR brought up a statement by CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper.

“Our nation’s religious, political and community leaders need to address the growing anti-Muslim rhetoric on the Internet and on talk radio that can lead to such incidents,”

Hooper was demanding enforcement of Islamic blasphemy laws, implying that  assaults on Muslims are directly linked to criticism of Islam by bloggers and talk radio hosts.  He was echoing the rhetoric of U.N. General Assembly and UNHRC resolutions condemning “defamation of Islam”.

  • Deplores the use of the print, audio-visual and electronic media, including the Internet, and any other means to incite acts of violence, xenophobia or
    related intolerance and discrimination against Islam or any other religion, as well as targeting of religious symbols
  • Also urges States to provide, within their respective legal and constitutional systems, adequate protection against acts of hatred, discrimination,
    intimidation and coercion resulting from defamation of religions, to take all possible measures to promote tolerance and respect for all religions and their value systems and to complement legal systems with intellectual and moral strategies to combat religious hatred and intolerance;

More recently, the President of the Ad Hoc Committee On Complementary Standards  issued a “Non-Paper Paper”  outlining strategy for a protocol to ICERD. Pay close attention to this critical excerpt.

5- Incitement to racial, national and religious hatred

  1. There is a need for further clarifying and reinforcing at the international level existing obligations on the eradication of all incitement to hatred and ‘ discrimination in any form and to prohibit by law, propaganda for war and advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to  discrimination, hostility or violence.
  2. In this context, complementary standards to be developed should observe the following parameters:
    • Article 4 of ICERD shall be extended to the crime of incitement to racial hatred covering offenses motivated by religious hatred against immigrant communities.
    • The protection provided shall extend to all individuals and groups within the jurisdiction of the State Party.
    • The prohibitions shall equally cover acts committed by any individual, group or organization, including political and media organizations as well as by national or local public authorities.
    • The provisions shall apply to any act which, in purpose or effect, incites discrimination, hostility or violence.

In recent months, there have been news reports of rioting and anti-Christian pogroms in India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Nigeria & Kenya. When do those events take place? When did the rioting over the Danish Cartoons take place? Why do riots happen immediately after Juma prayer services? What is preached in those sermons?

Muslims want Fiitna and similar revelations criminalize because the connection between the Qur’an & Islamic sermons and riots is revealed therein. They want this and similar blog posts criminalize because I expose their hypocrisy.  Predators who slither in dark crevices and under rocks do not like being exposed in the light of truth.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.” [Emphasis added.]

The Secretary General labeled Fitna “hate speech” & “incitement to violence” . Click the link and watch the documentary. Where is the hate speech? Where is the incitement? They are only in the Qur’an, hadith & Kutbah displayed; they do not flow from the lips of Geert Wilders.

There is plenty of hate speech and incitement to violence in the Qur’an, enough to make Islam a constant static violation of ICERD & ICCPR. This fact is fully documented in the International Qur’an Petition. It is Islam that must be outlawed, not ‘Islamophobia’.

September 2, 2009 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , | 4 Comments

In Your Eye, CAIR


I learned this morning, at Sons Of Apes And Pigs, that CAIR spokesmen made some interesting remarks about the Obama campaign. I looked up the source, and bring you some excerpts. Note that Ibn Misr has a different take on Obama’s recital and admiration of the Adhan. Ibn Misr describes the Adhan as an insult to Christians. His article is long, but very much worth reading. 

From CAIR’s web site:
    From an article by CAIR National Director of Communications Strategy Ahmed Rehab:

Obama has not gone far enough to challenge the notion that religious affiliation could disqualify Americans from serving their nation.

From Article VI of the Constitution. [Emphasis added.]

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

Under the Constitution, no law can require adherence to a particular creed. But voters are free, within their own conscience to be selective and reject candidates influenced by creeds acverse to the principles upon which the Constitution is founded; those specified in the Declaration of Independence.

[…]all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,

All men are created equal, with unalienable rights, implying the absence of divine mandate to rule. Moe said something very different, which is Islamic doctrine to be observed carefully.
Sahih Muslim Book 020, Number 4473:

It has been narrarted on the authority of Abu Huraira that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: People are subservient to the Quraish: the Muslims among them being subservient to the Muslims among them, and the disbelievers among the people being subservient to the disbelievers among them.

Sahih Muslim Book 020, Number 4476:

It has been narrated on the authority of ‘Abdullah that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: The Caliphate will remain among the Quraish even if only two persons are left (on the earth),

Moe’s tribe is dominant, and the Caliph must be a member of it.  That doctrine is not  compatible with the principles upon which this nation is founded. But there’s more.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.” means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.

Death & damnation be upon the tongue which uttered those cursed words! It is impossible for a lover of liberty to read them without execration. How can he vote for one who knows of those words without abjuring them and renouncing the one who pronounced them?  Why should we elect one who seeks our enslavement?

We have the right to life & liberty, but not according to Moe.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.”

Moe is ordered to fight us until we recite shehada, until we do, our blood is not sacred to Muslims.  So much for dignity & equality!  Why in Hell would any lover of liberty vote for a person who worships the Goddamn demon who ordered Moe to make war on us? How can a man of conscience vote for anyone who refuses to denounce that demon and its damnable doctrines?   Al-Mughira , when he met the Persian army, reported what Moe and his demon had commanded and promised. His insult should ring and burn in the eyes and ring in the ears of every lover of liberty, and guard him against voting for a slave of Allah.

“Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”

As I live, by Jehovah, no damned Muslim will be my master, nor will I be a slave!!! On this I stand firm, and my resolve will not be reduced.

It goes against all that I advocate that the mere rumor of a person being a Muslim — let alone actually being one — could be a tool to destroy political aspirations. This in a nation that prides itself on being the heart of the free world.

Given  the command & promise, above quoted as  issued to Muslims, none having any pride in this nation would ever consider electing a slave of the demon to serve in high office. Certainly those who elected  a Muslim to the Congress must be unaware of  the damnable doctrines enshrined in the  Qur’an & exemplified in Moe’s Sunnah.

If elected president, how would he deal with one of the most important civil rights questions of his generation? Would he turn a blind eye to the current climate of exclusionary fear-mongering, or would he take a stance against religious prejudice and bigotry?

That ambiguous statement is a thinly veiled demand for censorship; to outlaw writings such as this which expose the damnable doctrines of Islam to public view and warn of the existential threat it poses to life and liberty.  This is a stand against ‘religious’ prejudice, bigotry & intolerance which are prominent attributes of Moe’s demon: Allah. Examine what Allah said about Jews & Christians.

3:85. And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.
5:60. Say (O Muhammad  to the people of the Scripture): “Shall I inform you of something worse than that, regarding the recompense from Allâh: those (Jews) who incurred the Curse of Allâh and His Wrath, those of whom (some) He transformed into monkeys and swines, those who worshipped Tâghût (false deities); such are worse in rank (on the Day of Resurrection in the Hell­fire), and far more astray from the Right Path (in the life of this world).”

8:22. Verily! The worst of (moving) living creatures with Allâh are the deaf and the dumb, those who understand not (i.e. the disbelievers).9:30. And the Jews say: ‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on them, how they are deluded away from the truth!

98:6. Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and Prophet Muhammad  from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.

Muslims are in no position to complain of bigotry nor intolerance, which are hallmarks of their damnable murder cult.

Let’s face it, those who hatched the Muslim Obama rumors would not have bothered had it not been for a political and cultural environment in which demonizing and marginalizing Muslims generally goes by uncontested.

Who demonized Muslims but those who  subducted them into  Hell’s legion of murdering demons?  It is only enslavement by Allah that makes them demons.

Obama’s knowledge of Islam should count as added experience and not as a statement about his identity.

    What does Senator Obama know about Islam? He says that he was never a practicing Muslim. What did he learn in two years of Qur’an classes? Does he know about the ayat above cited? Does he know about the ahadith above cited? If so, why does he not denounce them? Why does he not speak out against Islam’s demonic imperative to conquer and subjugate the entire world?

I am not drawn to Obama for any other reason but his political outlook, one that brings me hope that we can move beyond divisiveness and polarization and toward a new unity for the common good.

What  member of the Democrat party  shuns divisiveness & polarization?  You expressed a thinly veiled hope that a President Obama  would violate our first amendment right to free expression by censoring criticism of Islam. Is that not  polarizing?

So it is not that I am offended as a Muslim that Obama would not want to be one; I couldn’t care less. I am casting a vote for the next president of the United States, not the next imam of my mosque.

You couldn’t care less about an egregious violation of Allah’s Sharia?  If Senator Obama has accepted Christ’s free offer of salvation, then he is a murtad who must be shunned…

@O8.1 [Reliance of the Traveler, search for O8.1]

When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.

@O8.2

In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.


He could start by saying something like: “There is not a Christian America, or a Jewish America, or a Muslim America. There is the United States of America.”

He already made a similar statement.  But your organization wants to convert this nation to Islam; to replace our Constitution with Sharia. Islam must be made dominant.

Quotes from an article by CAIR National Board Chairman Parvez Ahmed

The use of the image of Obama in a turban was clearly designed to make a visual link between the candidate and Islam, a political tactic that seeks to exploit existing anti-Muslim prejudice in our society.

Prejudice? The Qur’an declares  perpetual war on us; Moe declares open season on us, Islamic law requires at least one attack per year against us, 19 Muslims hijacked passenger aircraft to fly them into office buildings and we are ‘prejudiced‘? !

On Internet hate sites, religious bigotry has become the latest form of racism.

As detailed above, in response to Ahmed Rehab, ‘religious bigotry‘ has been enshrined in the Qur’an for damn near 1400 years.

The tenor of the current campaign speaks volumes about the state of religious tolerance in America.

The Qur’an speaks volumes about the state of ‘religious tolerance‘ in the  Goddamn world. Moe also spoke volumes about religious tolerance‘.

[Obama] has been unable to challenge anti-Muslim bigotry in the same way he has challenged racism and anti-Semitism.

Objection to Islam , criticism of Islam & condemnation of Islam & Muslims are not tokens of bigotry; they result from knowledge of Moe’s Goddamn murder cult. Having read your canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence,  we know that we have been cursed, and an open season declared upon our lives & property. we know that war is declared and prosecuted against us. We know, we are informing our compatriots, and , by our first amendment, we will not be silenced!!!

A community as mainstream and as integrated American Muslims should not have to squirm every time Islam becomes the subject of America’s political discourse.

A community of free men should not have to squirm, look over their shoulders and quicken their pace whenever they see a long beard, burka or olive skin.  They should not feel shivers traversing their spines when they hear the Adhan, which is actually a curse, insult and call to battle. They should not have, living among them, a fifth column dedicated  & devoted to dispossessing & enslaving them and raping their widows & orphans.  Islam is not the mainstream; it is a river of blood.

Muslims remain bewildered at the reluctance of presidential candidates to challenge Islamophobic bigotry.

Informed Americans remain bewildered at the continual lying of our President about Islam, when he deceitfully declares it a “great religion of peace”, “compatible with liberty” & “compatible with democracy”. Informed Americans are disgusted by candidates who express  admiration & respect for Islam and doubt the integrity of those who refuse to denounce it. .

When a Goddamn murder cult curses us, declares perpetual war on us, and open season on our lives & wealth, brings buildings down on 3000 of us and shoots 13 of us  from a position of concealment in the trunk of an automobile, fear of & objection to that cult is not irrational.  There is no phobia associated with Islam!

Because your books have been translated & published, because we can read, because we can observe what is happening in the world; a growing number of Americans are aware of the true nature & mission of Islam. We will not be silent. We will resist censorship, and we will continue to grow in numbers and exert political influence. Flee at once, all is known.

Doubters are encouraged to click the links in this post, read the full context, and judge for yourselves.  If you doubt that the words mean what they say;  then turn to 3:7. If any doubt remains after that, then read Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir of that verse. Note that the clear verses containing imperatives are to be believed and carried out. If any doubt remains, turn to ROPMA and read each of the Tafsir topics therein contained.  If, after that, any doubt remains, read the Congress Debate Koran petition, and follow the links therein contained.  Then  copy this blog post , paste it into an email, and send it to everyone you know.

March 6, 2008 Posted by | Politics | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

%d bloggers like this: