Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

United Nations Response to Innocence of Muslims: Treason Against Humanity!


Nassir Abdulaziz Al-Nasser, President of the 66th
session of the General Assembly spoke September 12, 2012 about
defamation of religious symbols. I will extract the most crucial words
and phrases while providing a link so that curious readers can
access the entire article.

  • condemns and deplores in the strongest terms
    • defamation of
    • religions
    • religious symbols
  • such
    acts amount to

    •  incitement to hatred
      • international instability
      • violate the purposes and principles of the UN Charter
  • enhance dialogue and
    broaden understanding

Secretary General Ban Ki-moon’s spokesman had remarks September 13.

  • condemns the hateful film
    •  deliberately designed to sow
      • bigotry
      • bloodshed

Secretary-General’s remarks to Opening
Session of the General Assembly High-Level Forum on the Culture of
Peace 08/14/12

  • hateful
  • disgusting
  • It is shameful to exploit the fundamental right to free
    expression by deliberately provoking bigotry and bloodshed

Secretary-General’s remarks at the Church of the
Holy Family 09-17-12

  • hatred and provocation
  • priest or lama  … rabbi or imam
    • standard bearers of
      • reason and respect
  • People everywhere look to religious leaders for guidance, support
    and direction.

    • promoting tolerance
      • mutual understanding
      • mutual respect

At the opening of Session 67, Ban addressed the
issue again.

  • incidents of
    • intolerance
    • hatred
  • We all need to speak up in favour of
    • mutual respect
    • understanding
      • of the
        • values
        • beliefs

I am embedding the video here in case you have not yet viewed it.
I want you to ignore the lousy casting, acting and production values;
concentrate on the conceptual content.

The video does not direct its audience to take any
action.  Viewers are not exhorted to hate Muslims, deface tomb
stones or destroy mosques.  It simply presents information about
current persecution of Copts in Egypt with impunity & official
complicity,  and the character & works of the founder of
Islam.

This post is not concerned with the truth or fallacy
of the conceptual content, that issue is detailed and documented with
quotes from and links to Islam’s canon in another blog post:  http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the
.

Islam divides the world into two houses: Dar
ul-Islam and Dar ul-Harb. The house of war is wherever Allah’s writ
does not run.  Muslims are at war against it to total conquest or
the end of the world, whichever come first.  Those who deny the fact of existential conflict,
seek to conceal it and distract our attention from it also seek to
prevent us from sounding a warning of impending danger so that our
nations will be unwilling or unable to defend us.  They are
traitors to the human race.   I shall proceed with the task of
contradicting the traitors point by point.

defamation of religions

The video’s subject is Moe, the founder of Islam;
neither a religion nor a religious symbol, Moe is a historical
personage who has been in his grave since 632. Moe has no knowledge of
the video, and is not harmed by it in any way.

Islam can not be defamed; it is already infamous,
having caused the premature deaths of an estimated 270*106
innocent people
.  A few statesmen discerned the truth about
it.  Did Montesquieu defame Islam?  Should he have
been prosecuted and imprisoned or beheaded for uttering &
publishing this?

From
the characters of the Christian and Mahometan religions, we ought,
without any further examination, to embrace the one and reject the
other: for it is much easier to prove that religion ought to humanise
the manners of men than that any particular religion is true.

It
is a misfortune to human nature when religion is given by a conqueror.
The Mahometan religion, which speaks only by the sword, acts still upon
men with that destructive spirit with which it was founded.

Did John Q. Adams defame Islam? Should he have been
prosecuted and decapitated for uttering and publishing this?

“In
the seventh century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab of the
lineage of Hagar [i.e., Muhammad], the Egyptian, […..] Adopting from
the new Revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life, and
of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust by adapting all the
rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the
sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the
fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the
allowance of polygamy; and 
he
declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his
religion, against all the rest of mankind
.
THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND LUST.- TO EXALT THE BRUTAL
OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE…. Between these two
religions, thus contrasted in their characters, a war of twelve hundred
years has already raged. The war is yet flagrant … While the
merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish
motives to human action, there can never be peace upon earth, and good
will towards men.”

Did Winston Churchill defame Islam? Should he have
been prosecuted and decapitated for uttering and publishing this?

How
dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!
Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as
hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The
effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly
systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of
property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

A
degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the
next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every
woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a
child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of
slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among
men.

Individual
Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion
paralyzes the social development of those who follow it.

No stronger retrograde force exists in the
world.
 Far
from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing
faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising
fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is
sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it
had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as
fell the civilization of ancient Rome.

Will anyone consider the possibility that those
statesmen read the Qur’an and studied history sufficiently to know of
the havoc wreaked by Muhammad and the four rightfully guided
caliphs?  Why did Adams call Moe a false prophet? Why did he
declare Islam inimical to peace? Were these hatemongers? Were they
attempting to incite riots and provoke international conflict or
warning against that which is so engaged?

Islam stands or falls on the foundation of one man:
Moe, who, alone, heard the revelations from Jibril and recited them to
his companions.  If Moe is proven to be a false prophet who
attributed to God words not spoken by him, then Islam must eventually
crumble like a vampire exposed to bright sunlight.  Open Sahih Bukhari to 6.60.311 to obtain a clue.

incitement to hatred

Has it ever crossed their weak little minds that
Islam should be an object of intense hatred?  Was it wrong to hate
Nazism in WW2 or Communism in the Cold War?  Can any sentient and
moral person know about the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides
without hating Islam?

What if Moe really was a child molester?  What
if he really did have Kinana tortured to death before raping his
widow?  What if his henchmen tied Um Qirfa’s legs to two camels
and drive them in opposite directions?  Should Moe and the crime
syndicate he founded be objects of hatred or not?   Click
these links to Qur’an verses, then tell me, in a comment, who incited
hatred and violence.

international instability

Islam’s critics are accused of threatening world
peace. What is the true threat to world peace?  Will you obtain a
clue?  J.Q. Adams gave us one earlier.

violates UN Charter

How could publication of a short video by a private
individual acting on his own accord, without complicity of any
government agency violate the UN Charter?  Is it possible that
Muslim mobs, attacking Embassies and murdering an Ambassador with
government complicity violated the Charter?

enhance dialogue

Is it possible to have a real dialogue with
Muslims?  Can Pope Benedict discuss Surah At-Taubah with the
Sheiks of Al-Azhar at Cairo? Does anyone recall “A Common Word Between
Us and You
“?  I created one blog to deliar that camel crap!

broaden understanding

Anyone who is ignorant of Islam’s founding,
doctrines and practices will have a better understanding thereof after
viewing “Innocence of Muslims” and might even be stimulated to read the
Qur’an & hadith to which I have linked.

condemns the hateful film

I condemn the hateful man it depicts and the
continuing criminal enterprise he founded: Islam. The film is truthful,
not hateful.  Islam is false, hateful and predatory.

deliberately designed to sow

bigotry

Bigotry is a hidebound adherence to prejudiced
opinion in the face of the facts.  The facts about Islam, exposed
in the video, make it worthy of condemnation. Your failure to condemn
Islam is bigotry. Your condemnation of the video is bigotry.  The
UN is led by bigots.

bloodshed

Where in “Innocence of Muslims” is the call to
arms?  Where is the exhortation to wage war?  But they are in
the Qur’an;  can you obtain a clue?  I provided a list of
links to it above.  Follow the links to Surah Al-Anfal 8 &
Surah At-Taubah 9 to obtain a clue.  The riots do not flow from
the video, they flow from the mosques at Jumah Salat and from state run
or state sanctioned mass media.

hateful

What is hateful about “Innocence of Muslims”?
Have you ever heard about Wala wal Bara?
It is “love and hate for the sake of Allah”. Allah loves those who
“fight in his cause” and hates everyone who is not Muslim.  Get a
clue.

disgusting

Sentient and rational viewers, not bigots, will be
disgusted by the reality of Moe’s character & actions and the
doctrines & practices of the crime syndicate he disguised as a
religion.  Bigots are disgusted by exposure of Islam as a
continuing crime against humanity.

shameful:

“It is shameful to exploit the fundamental right to
free expression by deliberately provoking bigotry and bloodshed”.

free expression

In a representative republic, freedom of speech is
required to facilitate open discussion of political issues,
personalities and affairs of state. The threat of war is one of those
issues which must be discussed freely, without fear of assault or
persecution.  Islam inculcates hatred and incites violence;
promising its acolytes eternal bliss in Allah’s celestial bordello if
they go to war and threatening them with eternal damnation if they
shirk.  We can not successfully defend ourselves against the real,
proximate and persistent threat of Islamic aggression which began when
we gained independence from England, without honest and open discussion
of the doctrines & practices of Islam.  Our first foreign wars
were in defense of our merchantmen against Islamic piracy.

provoking

The video provokes thought and study of Islam’s
canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis, jurisprudence and biography.
It does not provoke violence.  In the last three days, 49 viewers
were drawn to Islam Exposed by inquiries into the veracity of the
video.  In the same time period, my post on the truth of the video
was viewed 102 times on that blog.

bigotry

Bigotry is provoked by bigots: those who, without
reason, in clear contravention of the facts presented in the video,
condemn it and its creator & publisher.

bloodshed

Bloodshed is provoked by Imams whose rabble rousing
kutbah include shouts of the takbir and “jihad!”. “Allah hu akbar” is a
war cry, Muslims know it and they respond to it.

Imams

Standard bearers of reason & respect and
promoting tolerance & understanding. Yeah, right.  Why is most
of the Hell raised after 2p.m. local time on Fridays?  Get a clue
for Chrissake!

intolerance

The video is not intolerant nor is it the product of
intolerance.  Islam is intolerant: 3:85 and the context of 3:110 and the hadith which explains it demonstrate that
fact.  Declaring perpetual war against  pagans, Jews,
Christians & Zoroastrians, that’s tolerant.  Yeah,
right.

respect

Respect is given to whom respect is due, Islam does
not deserve any, it is pure, unmitigated evil; a war crime against
humanity.

understanding

Those of us who have read the Qur’an & Hadith
and delved into tafsir, Shari’ah & The Life of Muhammad
understand Islam.  To whatever extent the video stimulates reading
Islam’s canon, understanding will become more widespread.

values

Islam places a premium on “jihad in Allah’s cause”,
which was described by Moe as Islam’s “peak” and the “best deed”. Any
step taken to injure or enrage infidels is imputed to the Muslim
terrorist as a “deed of righteousness”; extra credit toward an upgrade
to his seat in the celestial bordello.  The life of this world is
but a passtime: the real action is in the celestial bordello.

beliefs

The world was created by Allah, who owns it and
everything on it. Allah gave the works to Moe and shared ruling it with
him.  Only Allah has the right to be worshiped. Only Allah has the
right to legislate. Think I am joking?

 

September 19, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Islamophobia: Projected Bigotry


When Muslims and LibTards accuse critics of Islam of “Islamophobia” bigotry and racism, they are projecting their own attitudes onto us.  They suffer from an irrational fear of criticizing Islam, that is the phobia.   They stubbornly ignore or reject  factual evidence of the evil nature of the war cult, that is the bigotry.  They harbor a secret white guilt, assuming that only members racial minorities can have virtue, that is the racism.   But Islam is a predatory way of life, neither a race nor a religion.

Mayor Peter Swiderski and his city board published a screed against AFDI’s informational bill board.  Links to the story follow.
http://www.westernjournalism.com/ny-mayor-free-speech-must-not-violate-political-correctness/
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/08/destroyers-vandalize-islamorealism-ads.html

“While the Board respects everyone’s right to free speech,” they wrote, “we categorically condemn the bigotry and innuendo expressed by this billboard message. To tar a faith and its followers because of the actions of a few is deplorable, hateful and morally repugnant.”

The Billboard:  “19,250 Islamic attacks since 9/11: It’s not Islamophobia, it’s Islamorealism.

Where does that number come from: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/  has charts listing the attacks year by year.

projection

bigotry and innuendo

Bigotry as defined by  http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bigotry

1.

stubborn and complete intolerance of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one’s own.
2.

the actions, beliefs, prejudices, etc., of a bigot.

 

Bigotry is the extreme hatred of one group resulting from severe prejudicial attitudes.

The Mayor and Council presented no evidence of bigotry on the part of AFDI, they assumed it, that is bigotry and innuendo.  They are projecting their own attitudes onto AFDI.

the message

Opposition to Islam is not irrational, it is well founded based on the number of terror attacks in the last eleven years.

the omission

The Islamic doctrines which make Islam inimical to the peace and security of the human race in general and America in particular will not fit conveniently on a billboard.  A list of the doctrines, with the evidence of their meaning and application will not fit conveniently in a blog post either, so I will outline a selection of the most important doctrines with links to relevant Qur’an verses, hadith and Shari’ah. .

 

To tar a faith

The billboard does not tar Islam based on the actions of a few.  It simply refutes the bigoted accusation of  “Islamophobia”. Islam must be judged on its doctrines; its canon of scripture, exegesis, tradition & jurisprudence as well as its fruits: 270,000,000 early deaths since 622.

tarring the watchmen

AFDI and others are sounding a crucial warning about an advancing enemy which will never rest until we are conquered because they believe their eternal destiny: fire or paradise, to be a function of  “fighting in Allah’s cause”.  LibTards will not learn from history because they ignore it.  The territories of the Byzantine and Persian Empires were mainly Christian, now they are dominated by Islam.  India was Hindu and Buddhist.  How did they come under Islamic domination?  What caused the Crusades?  What caused the Barbary Wars?

LibTards are incapable of answering those crucial questions.  They can only emote, using the calumnious buzz words of the day to tar critics of Islam. No bigoted LibTard will click through the links provided above to read the Qur’an, Sahih Bukhari , Sunan Abu Dawud, Tafsir Ibn Kathir and Reliance of the Traveller, bigots can’t be bothered with relevant, verifiable factual evidence, they are prisoners of raw emotion.

Notice to Muslims & LibTards:

Keep on bitching about “Islamophobia”; we will exploit your corrupt, idiotic complaints as  opportunities to drive home the fatal facts of Islamic doctrine and practice which must not be ignored.  Islam is not a religion, it is a predatory way of life founded for the purpose of the personal emolument of its founder.  The relevant quotes from Islam’s canon are included in this blog post:  “Islam’s Mercenary Mission“.  Islam is not peaceful; it is genocidally violent, by design.  The documentation of this fatal fact is contained in this blog post:  “What’s Wrong With Islam & Muslims?“.

Notice to Pastors, Priests & Rabbis:

Muslims assert that Jesus and the Old Testament Prophets were Muslims.  Yeah, right, Jesus Christ is a genocidal warlord who will lead the Muslims in their final genocide.  Doubt this?  Can you absorb relevant factual evidence?  Will you? It is contained in this blog post:  “The Defamation of Jesus Christ“; do you have the courage to learn the truth?

August 31, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Obamination: Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire!


Bare Naked Islam posted a still shot taken from the video of the execution of the Qur’an at the Dove World Outreach Center. I saved that image, cropped, adjusted and enlarged it for maximum clarity.

This is the original image, as posted at BNI.
Full image of burning Qur'an.

Examine it closely. Note that the cover is to the right of the back binding. Arabic Qur’ans are printed from right to left, their bindings are on the right side, not the left.  Note that the title is in English, barely legible.

In this cropped image, the Qur’an is brought up close. Note the title.
Close up of burning Qur'an.

This cropped image has been enlarged as much as possible and adjusted for maximum clarity.
Burning Qur'an adjusted for legibility.

The English title is legible. Because of the binding and title, we know that the executed Qur’an was an English translation, not an Arabic Qur’an.

Routledge encyclopedia of translation studies By Mona Baker  will give you some important background information on the controversy over translating the Qur’an into other languages.

When the PLO seized the Church of the Nativity, they performed istijmar with pages torn from the Bible. There was an on line fatwa permitting the practice, but it has been scrubbed.  They don’t consider the Bible to be holy, because the Qur’an supersedes it, and claims it to be corrupted.

It is required that Qur’an recitation be performed in Arabic.  They assert that no other language can convey the full meaning of the Arabic words.  They consider translations to be interpretations of the meaning of the Qur’an, not the Qur’an itself, so burning it should be no skin off their noses.

Pastors Jones & Sapp spent four hours trying the Qur’an before convicting and executing it. I was unable to view the streaming video, so I do not know what evidence was presented by the prosecutor, but I know that he is an apostate fluent in Arabic.  The prosecution witnesses were also apostates.

I have no knowledge of the evidence presented or witnesses called, if any, by the defense. I would like to see both sides post their briefs and evidence in pdf format.

In any case, rioting, murder & malicious destruction of property in reaction to the trial & execution of a Qur’an translation do not defend it, instead they pile on evidence of its evil effect on believers.

Obamination had remarks on the subject Saturday, since they are not yet posted on the White House blog, I rely on quotes found in a report on Yahoo News.

“The desecration of any holy text, including the Koran, is an act of extreme intolerance and bigotry,”

 

desecration

How anyone, especially the President of the United States, can impute sanctity to the Koran, or consider it to be sacred, is beyond imagining. What is sacred about a text which attributes divine sanction to imperatives for offensive conquest on a global scale, terrorism & genocide?  Muslims & liars will aver that the Qur’an does not do so. I challenge them to disprove the obvious!

  • 8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
  • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
  • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.”
  • 8:57. So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.
  • 9:120. It was not becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins of the neighbourhood to remain behind Allah’s Messenger (Muhammad SAW when fighting in Allah’s Cause) and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer their own lives to his life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allah, nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness. Surely, Allah wastes not the reward of the Muhsinun*
  • 8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

What can be more profane than attributing to deity a desire for genocide?

intolerance

What is more  intolerant than declaring war upon people because they do not share your superstition?  Is there any rational excuse for tolerating that?  The President of the United States implied that we should tolerate the damnable doctrines which motivated the Magnificent Nineteen  to hijack four airliners and slit the throats of the flight crews with the intention of flying them into occupied office buildings.

Demanding that we tolerate and hold sacred that which instigated Abomination 9/11 is treason, for which Obama should be impeached.

bigotry

Bigotry implies prejudice. Jones judged the Qur’an, based on evidence.  That is judgment, not bigotry.  Obama is “a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices” concerning Islam, in denial of the evidence.

No religion tolerates the slaughter and beheading of innocent people, and there is no justification for such a dishonorable and deplorable act.

 

slaughter

When one Jewish tribe surrendered following a two week siege, Moe slaughtered all the adult men and adolescent boys. Everything he did is sunnah: exemplary conduct to be emulated.  If no religion tolerates slaughter, then Islam is no religion.

  • Sunan Abu Dawud Book 38, Number 4390:
    Narrated Atiyyah al-Qurazi:
    I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those who had not grown hair.

innocent

Only Muslims are innocent, all others are kuffar and rebels against Allah.

  • 5:33. The recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.
    • ‘Wage war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. Tafsir Ibn Kathir

April 3, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Anti-Muslim Bigotry


A new post at Barenaked Islam pointed to two articles accusing Islam’s opponents of bigotry.

Michelle Boorstein asks at the Washington Post: How influential will anti-Muslim groups become?

For years there has been a small but passionate group of people concerned with the influence of Islam, and their activism seemed to be largely focused on blogging and lobbying political conservatives. But their presence — and the arguments they raise — seem to be coming into the broader sphere of late.
The author cites the controversy over the Cordoba House project and  Paypal’s censorship of Atlas Shrugs.  The Salon article she links to shouts “racially-motivated hatred” in its headline.

The entire anti-mosque campaign isn’t about anything other than pure, paranoid Islamophobia.
The article closes with a short story about two Arab Christians who were allegedly driven away from a recent protest of Cordoba House in N.Y.C.  Atlas Shrugs posted a communication from one of the Arab Cristians involved in that incident. Here is one paragraph from  that communication.

The reason I am writing to you, is because I am very disappointed in the mainstream media who used this minor incident to make a blanket generalization about all the attendees of the rally as Muslim haters.This kind of generalization was unfair to the good American people who legitimately stand against the building of a mosque next to ground zero and who are against Islamist agenda in the US. I am very well aware of such an agenda which has destroyed the Christian and Jewish existence in the Middle East.
Now you know what theose smug, smarmy left wingers are doing to pull the woll over your eyes.

The REAL News Network posted a video of two academics making the usual smarmy, self-righteous denunciation of “bigotry”. Note their loaded title:

How Western anti-Muslim bigotry became respectable.

According to them, the Islamic  conquest and occupation of  Southern & Eastern Europe was the greatest thing before sliced bread.  It produced a wonderful culture of architecture, infrastructure and academia.  They don’t give a damn about the slaugher, enslavement or burning of churches and monestaries.  Oh, no, those are minor, inconsequential incidents.

According to the Socialist narrative, all opposition to Islam is bigotry; Islamophobia.  It is evidence of paranoia.  Their narrative is false and malignant.  An estimated 270*106 people were slaughtered by Islam since 622. The slaughter of Hundus and the Armenian & Assyrian genocides flow directly from the foundational texts of Islam.

Genocide

Allah’s divine word includes these gems of genocidal bestiality.  Denial is not a river in Egypt. You can not disprove objective factual reality.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

47:4. So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom), or ransom (according to what benefits Islâm), until the war lays down its burden. Thus [you are ordered by Allâh to continue in carrying out Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm (i.e. are saved from the punishment in the Hell-fire) or at least come under your protection], but if it had been Allâh’s Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allâh, He will never let their deeds be lost,
The differential desires of Moe and Allah are clear from the phrases which I emphasized with bold font.  Moe wanted ransom, Allah wants great slaughter, killed and wounded many of them.  I linked the Surah:ayeh numbers to a table of ten parallel translations so that you can verify the obvious meaning of the quotes.

Of course, it could not possibly mean that, could it.  No, those verses must be metaphorical or allegorical.  Yeah, right. Ibn Kathir explained them in
The Command to strike the Enemies’ Necks, tighten Their Bonds, and then free Them either by an Act of Grace or for a Ransom.

(until you have fully defeated them,) meaning, `you have killed and utterly destroyed them.’
It appears that this Ayah was revealed after the battle of Badr. At that time, Allah reproached the believers for sparing many of the enemy’s soldiers, and holding too many captives in order to take ransom from them.
Surely those are anachronisms, long since expired.  Yeah, right.

(There will always be a group of my Ummah victorious upon the truth, until the last of them fight against Ad-Dajjal.)
jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist).  Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2526
So, where is my proof?  My proof is in another hadith  collected by Abu Dawud. Read it carefully, paying particular attention to the parts I emphasized.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 38, Number 4390:
Narrated Atiyyah al-Qurazi:
I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those who had not grown hair.

Had Atiyya reached puberty, he would have been slaughtered, he would not have survived to narrate that saying.  When the Banu Qurayzah surrendered, Moe had their men and adolescent boys slaughtered.  The estimates run between 700 and 900 decapitations in that incident.   And they are not finished yet. Muslims can not open the gates of Paradise until they complete the genocide of the Jews.

Sahih Muslim Book 041, Number 6985:
Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.
Genocide is not only a divine imperative, it is sunah, an example for future genrations of Muslims to emulate.  Now let us examine the consequence of the codification of that divine imperative and  exemplary conduct.  I quote from CPPCG.

Article 3

    The following acts shall be punishable:

    (a) Genocide;

    (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;

    (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;

    (d ) Attempt to commit genocide;

    (e) Complicity in genocide.

Article 3(c) of the Convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide requires that Islam be proscribed by law.  Other standing violations of international human rights covenants which require the proscription of Islam are documented in  Islam vs Human Rights.

Islam is intolerant; 3:85.  And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers. In 9:29, it declares perpetual war on Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians.

The current contrempts center around Ground Zero, where Muslims seek to erect a Mosque in the Burlignton Coat Factory outlet, as a symbol of superiority.  There is a little secret most Amaericans are unaware of.  Islamic law forbids conquered Christians from building or maintianing churches.  The quote is from a list of seven restrictions on dhimmis found in Reliance of the Traveller, Book O11.5.

-7- and are forbidden to build new churches.  http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO11-5.html
We have ample cause for objecting to Islam’s violence, supremacism, intolerance, terrorism & genocide.  Our objection is not bigotry nor is it racism; Islam is a  predatory way of life, not a race.

June 14, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , | Leave a comment

   

%d bloggers like this: