Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Homeland Security or Insecurity?


Freedom Ain’t Free welcomes the Department of Homeland Security, who began reading snooper.wordpress.com/2009/04/10/al-nafisi-incites-terrorism/ shortly after noon Nov. 6, ’09  and hung around through 3am  Nov. 8.

The Washington D.C. office loaded that single post 33 times while the Laredo TX.  office made 45 page loads, reading a few other posts in addition  to the post about Sheikh Nafisi.

In April, when the post was fresh, it was viewed 62 times. It had 9 hits in August, 7 in September and  9 in October, with 124 hits in November. Why did a post which averaged less than one hit per day  in recent months suddenly spike to 77, 41,2  three days in November?  What accounts for the multiple page loads?  Did multiple staffers load the page in succession?

A search for the Sheikh’s name did not turn up any relevant news using Google and Bing. Searches for recent crop duster  and anthrax related stories also came up empty.  There were two search engine referrals involving al-Nafisi. There was one page load for that post that was not directly attributable to the DHS.  I assume that DHS had some reason for searching for that name. What I do not understand is why they did not click through to MEMRI to view the source of the material I posted.

Is there some indication of a renewed potential for an anthrax attack?  That is just what we need with a flu epidemic under way;  if every cough and sneeze raised fears of anthrax inhalation, the emergency rooms would be swamped with panicked patients.

Our government needs to come clean with us, drop the pretenses and admit the fact that Islam is our enemy, having declared and prosecuted war against us.  The Bush / Obama blather about a “great religion of peace, hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists” is counterproductive, as is their policy of leaving our southern border wide open to a flood of illegal immigrants, including a substantial number of “other than Mexicans”. .

If I recall correctly, several GIs were killed in Iraq by a grenade tossed by a Muslim colleague.  The Fort Hood Massacre was perpetrated by a Muslim whose conduct and expressions had raised red flags.  Two cases do not form a clear pattern, but they do present a warning sign.  Our servicemen must not be placed at risk by mixing enemy forces into their ranks.

The time has come to purge our armed forces of Muslims. The time has come to weed them out of clerical, administrative and decision making positions in the federal bureaucracy.  A Muslim is one who submits to and obeys Allah.  What did he command them to do?  What did Muhammad exemplify for them to emulate? Expressions such as  “fight them”, “fight those who” and “cast terror” come to mind immediately. Regular readers of my posts are familiar with them and their sources.  The shooter was praising Allah while murdering his comrades.  Once is enough.

Did the army enlist American Nazis in WW2?  Why not?  Weren’t they harmless moderates, patriotic Americans? Would ANP members have experience conflict if sent to Europe to fight the Germans?  Who would they have aimed at?  Maj. Hasan was conflicted about fighting his Muslim brethren. Who did he aim at?

The time has come to drop the pretense & fantasy and observe the facts in the cold clear light of reason. If the Congress & President we elected won’t do what is right, then we need to replace them in the next election cycle.

November 8, 2009 Posted by | Home Land Security, Political Correctness | , , , , | 1 Comment

Al-Nafisi Incites Terrorism


Link to the video.

MEMRI Special Dispatch- No. 2247 02/16/09

Abdallah Al-Nafisi, a Kuwaiti professor, had his speech broadcast by Al-Jazeera TV  February 2. The following is a transcript of the English sub titles.

Four pounds of anthrax in a suitcase this big – carried by a fighter through tunnels from Mexico into the U.S. are guaranteed to kill 330,000 Americans within a single hour, if it is properly spread in population centers there  What a horrifying idea. 9/11 will be small change in comparison.  Am I right? There is no need for airplanes, conspiracies, timings, and so on. One person, with the courage to carry four pounds of anthrax, will go to the White House lawn, and will spread this “confetti” all over them, and then will do these cries of joy. It will turn into a real “celebration.”

The WMD is a problem. The Americans are afraid that the WMDs might fall into the hands of “terrorist” organizations like Al-Qaeda and others.  There is good reason for the American’s fears, because Al-Qaeda used to have in the Herat region… it had laboratories in north Afghanistan.  They have scientists, chemists and nuclear physicists.  They are nothing like they are portrayed by these mercenary journalists – backward Bedouins living in caves. No, no. By no means. This kind of talk can fool only naive people. People who follow such things know that Al-Qaeda has laboratories just like Hizbullah.

Hizbullah has laboratories in South Lebanon, in which it produces weapons and sells them. Hizbullah has laboratories in South Lebanon, from which it sells weapons to Romania and Hungary.

If they call someone a terrorist, say: “He’s a friend of mine.”  Why? Because these “terrorists” are the world’s most God-fearing people.  They are the most honorable people in the world, the best people in the world. [Applause.] I have personally met Mullah Omar. I had the honor of meeting with Mullah Omar. This is a man who does not belong to this era. He always refused to meet with Western delegations. He would say to them: “Go to Kabul, I am in Qandahar.”  “Truly, the polytheists are impure” – if you know what I mean.  “Go meet the Foreign minister to talk politics, I am staying here. ”  This is the kind of people who are suitable for dealing with the West.  As for Arafat, Dahlan, and their ilk – they do not benefit the nation in any way.

In the US, there are more than 300,000 militia members, who are calling to attack the federal government in Washington, and to banish the Arabs, the Jews, and the negoes (sic) from the US.   These are racist people.  They are called “rednecks.”  The Ku Klux Klan. They are racists.  These militias even think about bombing nuclear plants within the US.  May Allah grant them success,  [Laughter.]  even though we are not white, or even close to it, right?  They have plans to bomb the nuclear plant at Lake Michigan.  This plant is very important. It supplies electricity to all of North Africa (sic). May Allah grant success to one of these militia leaders, who is thinking about bombing this plant. I believe that we should devote part of our prayers to him.  We should pray that Allah grants him success, so he can complete this mission, and we will be able to visit him and congratulate him, Allah willing.

Allah stated in the Koran that the hostility between us and (the Jews) is eternal.   So whoever talks about Dialogue – cut off his tongue!  What Dialogue are they talking about?! There is no room for Dialogue.  Allah said that our hostility toward the Jews is eternal, and then along comes someone and talks about brotherhood and so on….  Anyone who contradicts the Koran is an infidel.    Accusing people of heresy?  Yes. I’m all for it.  Yes, I support accusing people of heresy.

We should also defend the resistance, and not remain silent in the face of this organized campaign against the resistance, in the press of the Arabian Peninsula and the Gulf, and other Arab newspapers.  Thee are voices expressing doubts about the leaders of the resistance.  We must confront these (journalists) and prevent them from continuing this, even if it means calling them over the phone, and saying to them:  “Do not repeat these despicable things in your columns or your articles, or else we will take the following measures against you.”   We must resort to pressure with these people.  We must not remain silent.  We must not leave them to their own devices under the pretext of freedom of expression. This is a fifth column. I, abdullah Fahd Abd Al-Aziz Al-Nafisi, am inciting you to confront, using any means possible,  anyone who speaks out against the resistance. Any means possible” – get it?

The Hamas ministers are mujahideen, I know a minister who actually participated in operations.

In Special Dispatch- No. 2281, 03/16/09, MEMRI quotes three  “liberal” critics of Abdallah Al-Nafisi.  One of them, columnist Ahmad Al-Sarraf, had this to say.

“More importantly, what would we, the Arabs and the Muslims, or [anyone else], gain if a religious fanatic carried out to the letter what this ‘great thinker’ said? For example, would the world be a more just, good, and peaceful place, or would this be this be the first sign of the coming of the awaited Mahdi, [who is said to arrive] when the world is filled with injustice and oppression?

“What would be the response of the U.S. government and its people if we killed 330,000 innocent Americans in a single hour? Would we then become capable of getting Palestine back from the Israelis, the [UAE] islands back from the Iranians, Alexandretta back from the Turks, and Andalus back from the Spaniards? And what good would all that be if nuclear bombs fell on our heads and destroyed the little that is good in our countries?

What are those, if not pragmatic arguments? Concern is expressed about outcomes, expected failure and possible retaliation. Where is the condemnation based on the intrinsic immorality of the proposal?

“And are our feelings and emotions so dead that we are not bothered by [the prospect of] the death of 330,000 innocent Americans in a single hour – among whom may well be some of our own people, and true friends – just because the government of this country has helped one of our enemies? And as though we ourselves haven’t been our own enemy for hundreds of years? Oh logic, oh reason: how beautiful you are, and how rare.”

The writer implies enmity to Israel, does he object to attacks against her as well? Would he have responded in this manner if Al-Nafsi had suggested an attack on Tel Aviv? Notice  the qualifier: “innocent Americans”.  Are there “guilty Americans” who should be killed?  Is Ahmad aware that Allah considers all Non-Muslims to be sinners who must be humiliated, punished and subjugated?

Dr. Al-Nafisi  is a citizen of Kuwait, a nation with good reason to have a favorable attitude towards the USA.  The speech was delivered to a an approving audience in Bahrain, another supposedly “moderate” Muslim nation.

April 10, 2009 Posted by | Religion of Peace | , | 2 Comments

   

%d bloggers like this: