Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Speaking Out Against Intolerance

Speaking Out Against Intolerance

Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization,
discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons,
based on religion or belief continues by calling all states to take
actions based on remarks by OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu
addressed to the HRC before their vote on one of the previous
resolutions. Eight points were outlined in the speech, and included in
the current draft.

Calls upon all
States to take the
following action
s, as
called for by the
Secretary-General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, to foster
a domestic
environment of religious tolerance, peace and respect by

(e) Speaking out
against intolerance
, including advocacy of
religious hatred

that constitutes incitement to
discrimination, hostility or violence

speaking out

    This suggestion from the OIC was included in HRC Res 16/18 and implemented in September
of  ’12 by Obamination’s bitching about The Innocence of
they falsely blamed for the  Benghazi  Attack. 
Obamination condemned the video without contesting the validity of its
conceptual content, which has been verified from authentic sources.


    The intolerance displayed in the video comes from
Moe: his
intolerance of Christianity, Judaism & Pagans. The video itself is
not intolerant.


    The video does not advocate violence against persons
or property.
Moe advocated and engaged in violence, which the video accurately

religious hatred

    The video accurately portrays Islamic religious
hatred, it does not advocate hatred.


    The video accurately portrays Moe preaching military
conquest, it
exposes incitement without engaging in it.  The rioting resulted
rabble rousing kutbah in mosques during Jumah Salat, not from the
video. Christians who viewed the video were not incited to violence by


    The violence realistically depicted in the video
emanates from the damnable doctrines of Islam enshrined in the Qur’an and exemplified in the sunnah.  
The riots blamed on the video came from mosques, not from
The video does not suggest that anyone should engage om vop;emce. the
Qur’an commands it, Moe exemplified it and the Imams preach it.

November 15, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , | 1 Comment

Incidents Of Intolerance

A/C.3/68/L.48 Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons, based on religion or belief continues with another expresion of deep concern after welcoming previous resolutions.

Deeply concerned about incidents of intolerance, discrimination and violence
against persons based on their religion or belief in all regions of the world,

Deploring any advocacy of discrimination or violence on the basis of religion
or belief,

Strongly deploring all acts of violence against persons on the basis of their
religion or belief, as well as any such acts directed against their homes, businesses,
properties, schools, cultural centres or places of worship,
Strongly deploring, further, all attacks on and in religious places, sites and
shrines in violation of international law, in particular human rights law and
international humanitarian law, including any deliberate destruction of relics and

Concerned about actions that wilfully exploit tensions or target individuals on
the basis of their religion or belief,

Expressing deep concern at the instances of intolerance, discrimination and
acts of violence occurring in the world, including cases motivated by discrimination
against persons belonging to religious minorities, in addition to the negative
projection of the followers of religions and the enforcement of measures that
specifically discriminate against persons on the basis of religion or belief,

Expressing concern at the growing manifestations of intolerance based on
religion or belief that can generate hatred and violence among individuals from and
within different nations, which may have serious implications at the national,
regional and international levels, and in this regard emphasizing the importance of
respect for religious and cultural diversity, as well as interfaith and intercultural
dialogue aimed at promoting a culture of tolerance and respect among individuals,
societies and nations,

If they really cared about the Christians being shot, blown up, burned to death inside their churches and otherwise terrorized in Pakistan, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria and Egypt with governments turning a blind eye if not actively supporting the mayhem, perhaps they would send in peace keeping forces to protect the innocent victims instead of sitting around deploring the violence and wringing their hands.

But they do not give a damn about that. Instead they are concerned that Pastor Terry Jones might burn a few thousand Qur’ans. They are concerned about Representative Bachman’s letter to an Inspector General inquiring as to why Muslim Brotherhood infiltrators are not properly vetted.

What are “incidents of intollerance”?  What is so deplorable about discrimination?  Shouldn’t we try to expel and exclude the enemy fifth colomun from our midst?

What are “insatances of intolerance”?  Would CAIR’s demands to shut down speeches by Usama Dakdok and Pamela Geller qualify as “instances of inteolerance”, or is it their freedom of expression the UN is bitching about?

Concerned about intolerance?  Oh, really?  Islamic law states that because we are not Muslims, we must be killed. Does the United Nations have a God blessed clue for Chrissake?

Concerned about violence?  Do the United Nations have a God blessed clue about the Islamic law that requires Muslimsto engage in offensive warfare at least once in every year?  Do they give a damn about Islam’s promise of reward for acts of terrorism?

Sadly, their only concern is finding ways to shut us up: to squelch our exposure of the evil which masquerades as the “religion of peace”.

November 9, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Jihad, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , | 2 Comments

Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization

The Draft Resolution
“Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of,
and discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against,
persons based on religion or belief” contains only minor changes,
essentially maintaining the malignant malarkey of HRC 16/18 
passed last year.

Now that the draft has been submitted and posted to
the web, you can expect to see and hear more assertions of
victory.  The self-appointed experts will tell us that the
“defamation of religions’ meme has been abandoned; proved by the boiler
plate paragraphs carried over from last year’s resolutions.

The draft will be discussed and probably adopted by
consensus  Tuesday March 20, 2012.  There is nothing we can
do to stop it. The good news is that the resolution has no enforcement
mechanism, its only effect is adding false moral support to Islam’s
victim card narrative and its persecution of indigenous

The draft was submitted by Pakistan on behalf of the
OIC; its initiative is Islamic.

free expression

   Reaffirming the positive
role that the exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and

expression and the full
respect for the freedom to seek, receive and
impart information

can play in strengthening
democracy and combating religious intolerance,

Am I the only one who perceives the inversion of
fact and fantasy?  Freedom of opinion & expression is the
central target of the resolution.  They demand that we tolerate
the intolerable: perpetuation, propagation & promotion of the
concept of divine mandate to conquer and subjugate the entire world
through deception, aggressive wars
of conquest
and terrorism.  Islam asserts a divine mandate to
; rape & enslave our widows and orphans while seizing
our real & personal property

The strategic objective of the resolution is the
enactment & enforcement of national & international legislation
criminalizing all criticism of Islam.  When I write “Muhammad was
a terrorist.”, which is substantiated ty Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220,
I mention something impermissible and should be killed according to
Islamic law.  They want that law enforced! That is the purpose of
the draft resolution.


While the defamation meme is implicit rather than
explicit in this resolution, the Draft Resolution on “Freedom of religion or belief
contains, in the seventh paragraph on its second page, an important
clue to reality.  Do not overlook this clue!

Emphasizes that no religion should be
equated with terrorism
, as this may have

adverse consequences on the
enjoyment of the right to freedom of religion or belief of all

members of the religious
community concerned;

freedom to terrorize

Allah said that he would cast terror: 3:151
& 8:12.
said that he cast terror: 33:26,
Moe said that he was made
victorious with terror: Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  Muslims are commanded to obey
and emulate
.  If Islam is equated with terrorism, then it must be
prohibited by law.

Islam is an inseverable package deal: all or
nothing, specified in 2:85.
Believers fight in Allah’s cause, killing and being killed specified
in  9:111.
Believers who take any
step to injure or enrage disbelievers
get extra credit for an
upgrade to their seat in Allah’s Celestial Bordello.

My right to freedom of opinion & expression; to
state the fact that terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam, must
be subordinated to the Muslims’ right to engage in terrorism.


Islam imposes the death penalty for apostasy,
including reviling Allah, Moe or Islam.  The penalty is explicitly
stated in Reliance of the Traveller O8.1; the list of
apostatizing acts in O8.7 tells us what is impermissible to
mention.  The rule is extended to dhimmis (conquered Jews &
Christians) in O11.10.  Islam does not tolerate criticism of
Moe & Allah.  Moe had critics murdered.

The OIC is demanding, through the agency of the
Human Rights Council, that we be exhorted and compelled to tolerate a
war cult, disguised as a religion, which perpetuates genocidal

Expresses deep concem at the
continued serious instances of derogatory stereotyping,

negative profiling and
stigmatization of persons based on their religion or belief,

as well as programmes and
agendas pursued by extremist organizations and

groups aimed at creating and
perpetuating negative stereotypes about religious

groups, in particular when
condoned by Governments;

derogatory stereotyping

are genocidally violent
” has meaning as a derogatory stereotype
precisely because Islam
is genocidally violent

(alleged defamation) and Muslims are adherents to Islam.  History
shows us that the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides were
perpetrated by Muslims, on orders of the caliph.  The defamation
meme is malignantly false, ostensibly eliminated yet deeply embedded in
the resolution.  That which is intrinsically infamous can not be

programmes and agendas

What they have in mind is the Dutch, Swiss &
Austrian freedom parties and “Islamophobic” comments and campaign
advertisements by American politicians.

Expresses its concern that
incidents of religious intolerance, discrimination and

related violence, as well as
of negative stereotyping of individuals on the basis of

religion or belief, continue
to rise around the world, and condemns, in this

context, any advocacy of
religious hatred against individuals that constitutes

incitement to discrimination,
hostility or violence, and urges States to take

effective measures, as set
forth in the present resolution, consistent with their

obligations under
international human rights law, to address and combat such



The reference is to Fitna, the 15 minute documentary
by Geert Wilders, the Motoons,
International Burn the Koran Day & International Judge the Koran
Day.   If it is critical of Islam and receives high profile
public attention, it is an incident, according to the OIC.

advocacy & incitement

Words have meanings, but the standard meanings do
not apply when Muslims utter them.  Spoken by Muslims and their
dhimmis, words mean what Muslims want them to mean, not what we expect
them to mean.  Exposing Islam’s advocacy of hatred and incitement
to genocidal violence is, in their double speak, advocacy &
incitement.   Nothing illustrates that fact better than this

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for
hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The
right of free expression is not at stake here.”


Adopting measures to criminalize
incitement to imminent violence based on

religion or belief;

measures to criminalize

Anyone not suffering from cranial-rectal
juxtaposition should recognize that as a demand to outlaw Fitna, the
Motoons and every expression critical of Islam.

March 19, 2012 Posted by | Freedom Of Speech, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment


%d bloggers like this: