Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Innocence of Islam Full Production ? Yes, it is true!


Bare Naked Islam
embedded this video in a post. It runs 74 minutes, is
claimed to be the full production of Innocence of Muslims.  Lets
get it rolling! Cross post, & share, download and save a copy if
you can.  The truth must prevail!!!

Documentation of the truth of the trailer:

http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the

September 17, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Radicalism?, Islamic Terrorism, Political Correctness | , | Leave a comment

Innocence of Muslims Update: Muslim Brotherhood Spews Snake Feces!


A point by point refutation of the snake feces spewed by Al Ikhwan
Al-Muslimeen, with citations and links to Islam’s canon of scripture,
tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence given in evidence to
substantiate my case.  In the matter of the God blessed exposure
of Islam: “Innocence of Muslims”, whose theme and content are
essentially true.  And in the matter of contumacious demands for
persecution of revelators who expose Islam as a continuing crime
against humanity.

You will find reproduced below the spew of snake feces, with a link to
the source.  The spew is followed by refutation under H1 headers
being the concepts to be exposed.  Bold, blue, underlined text is
hyperlinked to source documents including the Qur’an, two sahihs,
Tafsir Ibn Kathir and Reliance of the Traveller.

To all of which I proudly append the aforesaid video, may Almighty God
bless, defend & protect everyone who participated in its creation,
execution and distribution. Amen!

http://www.ikhwanweb.com/article.php?id=30286

 One and a half billion Muslims
are subjected to humiliation and abuse in the person of their leader,
Mohammed, the Messenger of God, the Prophet of Islam, of mercy and good
tidings for the whole world.

With the message of God, Islam, Prophet Mohammed pulled peoples out of
the abyss of backwardness and barbarism to the heights of
sophistication and honorable humanity.

He lit the pathways of progress and human thought for all mankind, with
pure faith in the one God, belief in all Messengers without distinction
or discrimination, full respect and reverence for all Prophets.

The Messenger of God gave the world Islam, which guarantees all people
freedoms of belief and worship as well as respect and protection for
places of worship, freedom of opinion and expression, human equality
and public justice, dignity and solidarity and cooperation among all
human beings.

He gave us Islam, which recognized human rights even before anyone in
the whole world knew what human rights were. Islam even recognized the
sanctity of a human’s blood, honor and money, which must not be
violated.

The repeated abuse of the Messenger of God indicate the presence of
hatred and bigotry in those who stand behind it, with ignorance,
connivance and indulgence in those who permit such persistent abuse.

Thus hurting the feelings of one and a half billion Muslims cannot be
tolerated, and the people’s anger and fury for their Faith is
invariably predictable, often unstoppable.

We denounce abuse of all Messengers of God, Prophets and Apostles, and
condemn this heinous crime. We further call for criminalization of
assaults on the sanctities of all heavenly religions.

Otherwise, such acts will continue to cause devout Muslims across the
world to suspect and even loathe the West, especially the USA, for
allowing their citizens to violate the sanctity of what they hold dear
and holy. Hence, we demand that all those involved in such crimes be
urgently brought to trial.

Certainly, such attacks against sanctities do not fall under the
freedom of opinion or thought. They are crimes and assaults against
Muslim sanctities, and must not be tolerated by the countries where
they are produced or launched, since they are also detrimental to the
interests of those countries in dealings with the peoples of the Muslim
world.

The West has passed and imposed laws that punish those who deny or
express dissident views on the Holocaust or question the number of Jews
killed by Hitler, a topic which is purely historical, not a sacred
doctrine.

The peoples and governments of the Muslim world have every right to
condemn, with all peaceful and legal means, this new violation and
heinous attack, and to take appropriate action to deter repeats of such
acts of barbaric aggression.

While we reject and condemn the bloodshed and violent response to that
abuse and the incredible tolerance certain countries show towards it,
we cannot ignore the fact that these countries never made a move
regarding the abuse until after the strong reaction seen across the
Muslim world.

We believe those countries should take appropriate actions and lay out
clear and proper procedures to deal with such crimes, especially since
preparations for this abuse took place plainly, right under the noses
of authorities in those countries – over several months. Prevention is
always better than cure.

Finally, we call upon all Muslims to uphold and apply Quranic
principles and emulate the Messenger of Allah. That is the most
effective way to honor him – by setting a good example, particularly
because this abuse comes at a time when peoples are trying to
communicate with mutual respect.

Those who insult the sanctities wish to poison budding relations
between the peoples, to disrupt the efforts to build bridges between
civilizations, and to sow discord between the peoples.

The Muslim Brotherhood

Cairo – September 12, 2012

 

humiliation

You are humiliated by being damned fools;
subscribing to the world’s worst mix of superstition & war
crimes.   When we expose the rotten core of Islam; its
genocidal terrorist conquest, we do not humiliate you, we expose your
humiliation and your damnation; you are the slaves of Satan.

Message of God

That message was brought by Jesus Christ. Moe
brought the message of Satan: eternal damnation, casting billions into
barbarism and the pit of Hell.

respect & reverence

In a pig’s ass: the Gd’d Qur’an!

4:157.
And because of their saying (in boast), “We killed Messiah ‘Iesa
(Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), the Messenger of Allâh,” – but they killed him not, nor
crucified him
,
but the resemblance of ‘Iesa (Jesus) was put over another man (and they
killed that man), and those who differ therein are full of doubts. They
have no (certain) knowledge, they follow nothing but conjecture. For
surely; they killed him not [i.e. ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary)
]:

3:55. And (remember) when Allâh said: “O ‘Iesa
(Jesus)! I will take you and raise you to Myself and clear you [of the forged
statement that ‘Iesa (Jesus) is Allâh’s son]

of those who disbelieve, and I will make those who follow you
(Monotheists, who worship none but Allâh) superior to those who
disbelieve [in the Oneness of Allâh, or disbelieve in some of His
Messengers, e.g. Muhammad , ‘Iesa (Jesus), Mûsa (Moses), etc., or in
His Holy Books, e.g. the Taurât (Torah), the Injeel (Gospel), the
Qur’ân] till the Day of Resurrection. Then you will return to Me and I
will judge between you in the matters in which you used to dispute.”

3:61.
Then whoever disputes with you concerning him [‘Iesa (Jesus)] after
(all this) knowledge that has come to you, [i.e. ‘Iesa (Jesus)] being a slave of Allâh,
and having no share in Divinity
)
say: (O Muhammad ) “Come, let us call our sons and your sons, our women
and your women, ourselves and yourselves – then we pray and invoke
(sincerely) the Curse of Allâh upon those who lie.”

And in Tafsir Ibn Kathir!

… In the future, the Jews will
support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa,
son of Mary, will kill the Jews. This will occur just before the end of
this world….

And in Sunan Abu Dawud

Book 37, Number 4310:

Narrated AbuHurayrah:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: There is no prophet between
me and him, that is, Jesus (peace_be_upon_him). He will descent (to the
earth). When you see him, recognise him: a man of medium height,
reddish fair, wearing two light yellow garments, looking as if drops
were falling down from his head though it will not be wet. He will fight the people for the
cause of Islam
. He will break the cross,
kill swine, and abolish jizyah. Allah will perish all religions except
Islam
. He will destroy the Antichrist and will live on the earth
for forty years and then he will die.
The Muslims will pray over
him.

And in Sahih Bukhari

Jesus will say, ‘I am not fit for
this undertaking, go to Muhammad
the Slave of Allah whose past
and future sins were forgiven by Allah.’…

freedom of belief

In a pig’s ass: the G’d’d Quran!

3:85. And whoever
seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him
,
and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.

3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of
Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples
ever raised up for mankind
; you enjoin Al-Ma’rûf
(i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar
(polytheism, disbelief

and all that Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had
the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would
have been better for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are
Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s
Command)
.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever
raised up for mankind.
” means, the best of peoples for the
people, as you bring them with
chains on their necks till they embrace Islam
.

8:39. And fight them until
there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping
others besides Allâh) and the religion
(worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world

]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then
certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

9:29. Fight against those who
(1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that
which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who
acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among
the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the
Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Shari’ah: Reliance of the Traveller

O11.5

Such non-Muslim subjects
are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and
indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In addition, they:

-1- are penalized for committing adultery or
theft, thought not for drunkenness;

-2- are distinguished from
Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt
(zunnar);

-3- are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykum”;

-4- must keep to the side of
the street
;

-5- may not build higher
than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings
, though if they
acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

-6- are forbidden
to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display
crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of
their funerals and feastdays;

-7- and are forbidden to build new churches

recognized human rights

In a pig’s ass: Sahih Bukhari! Our blood and
property are not sacred to Muslims: its open season; and we have no
rights.

 

Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been
ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be
worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face
our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will
be sacred to us
and we will not interfere with them except
legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn
Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life
and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to
be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays
like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has
got the same rights
and obligations as other Muslims have.”

ignorance

Many of us have read Islam’s canon of scripture,
tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence so that we are no longer
ignorant.  We hate Islam because it is false, malignant and
malicious.  We expose Islam so that our ignorant fellow citizens
will learn what we have learned, curse & condemn Islam and
disrespectfully demand its eradication because it is a clear, present
and persistent existential threat to our lives and liberties.

cannot be
tolerated:

perpetual war

genocide

terrorism

All of which are intrinsic sacraments of
Islam.  I direct doubters, dissenters & Deniers to full
documentation of the fatal facts:  https://snooper.wordpress.com/whats-wrong-with-islam-muslims/
.

demand criminalization

You demand that the first, most basic element of
self defense: sounding warning of impending danger be outlawed!
Paul Revere’s Ride would be illegal.  Books and movies exposing
the evils of Nazism & Communism would be illegal.  In a pig’s
ass!:Your G’d’d Shari’ah!

O8.7: Acts that Entail Leaving Islam

-4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah
bless him and give him peace);

-5- to deny the existence of Allah, His
beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His
attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: v1);

-6- to be sarcastic about Allah’s name, His
command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;

-7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything
which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse
that does belong to it;

-15- to hold that any of Allah’s messengers or
prophets are liars, or to deny their being sent;

-16- to revile the religion of Islam;

O11.10

The agreement is also
violated
(A: with respect to the offender alone) if the state
has stipulated that any of the following things break it, and one of
the subjects does so anyway, though if the state has not stipulated
that these break the agreement, then they do not; namely, if one of the
subject people:

-…

-5- or mentions something
impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him
peace), or Islam.

O11.11

When a subject’s agreement with the state has
been violated, the caliph chooses between the four alternatives
mentioned above in connection with prisoners of war (o9.14).

crimes

Islam is the crime! Exposing its demon, Profit,
abominable doctrines & practices is fully consistent with the
rights of self-defense and free expression.  Every G’d’d Muslim
must be tried for advocacy of and participation in crimes against
humanity: offensive conquest, terrorism & genocide!

freedom of opinion & expression

“Congress shall make no law abridging freedom of
speech or of the press.”  I have an absolute right under the Bill
of Rights of the United States Constitution to know and to declare,
utter and publish the truth about your G’d’d demon, profit & war
machine.  And every time you bitch about it, demanding my
persecution, I will redouble my efforts to alert, arouse, warn and
inform my fellow citizens!

emulate the Messenger of Allah

The pig’s ass! In Sahih Muslim:

 

Book 019, Number 4436:

It has been narrated on the authority
of Jabir that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said:
Who will kill Ka’b b. Ashraf?
He has maligned Allah, the Exalted, and His Messenger
. Muhammad
b. Maslama said: Messenger of Allah, do you wish that I should kill
him? He said: Yes. He said: Permit me to talk (to him in the way I deem
fit). He said: Talk (as you like).

September 14, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Islamic Radicalism?, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Pastor terry Jones in the Liar’s Den: an Exposure of Islam through Refutation of Lies


This video was posted on Facebook, it dates from last year, but the
issues raised in it are current because Pastor Jones is protesting the
death sentence of Iranian Pastor Youcef Nadarkhani and will
burn Qur’ans and images of Moe if he is not set free by April 28.
Pastor Jones has also declared International Judge Muhammad Day to be
celebrated September 11th.

Pastor Terry Jones walked into the liar’s den about a year ago and
submitted to a spew of lies, distortions & insults.  The
adversaries spew great volumes of malignant malarkey,  Pastor
Jones gets little  chance to refute the multitudinous lies.
Notice
that Jones  listens patiently to their screeds but they interrupt
him when he tries to answer their malignant accusations.

Unfortunately, Pastor Jones is insufficiently
informed and articulate; unable to smoothly & quickly  refute
the rapid fire spew of deception coming from his adversaries: Sayed
Hassan Al-Qazwini & Reverend Edwin Rowe .

It is difficult to absorb and think critically about
the important
issues raised when the spew of malignant malarkey flows by so rapidly.
Because of
the target rich environment provide by the spew of lies, I have
attempted to transcribe the critical remarks of the principle
participants in the row, minus the comments of the token lawyer.
Due to my poor auditory acuity and miserable typing skills, this will
not be perfect word for word, but will be close enough to communicate
the main points.   Please read their words carefully and
examine the evidence I will submit in my commentary to follow.

I have highlighted some crucial words & phrases
and linked them to my comments. Click the highlighted expressions to go
directly to my comment and use your back button to return to your place
in the text.

 You have ignited a firestorm,
you
have insulted
millions
of people around the world and here in detroit.
What are you trying to do and why here?

 

We are going to continue to try to
raise awareness here in America and around the world.

As you might be aware of, I spent thirty years as a
missionary in Europe, during that time I saw the growth of radical
Islam.  What we are trying to do is raise an awareness of jihad,
of Shari’ah; we are trying to raise that awareness here in
America.

As we have said many times we have come here to
Dearborn in the spirit of peace, we are not demonstrating against the
rights of Moslems, we are not demonstrating against the mosque there,
we are not demonstrating against the Koran.  The Moslems in this
country, if they have come here legally, if they have been born here,
if they have converted to Islam, then they are of course
welcome
here,

The only thing  we ask is that they honor
and obey and submit to the Constitution
of the United
States.  If
they are willing to do that then our message to them is one of
welcome.  If they have come here with a secret hidden agenda which
is definitely possible–we have seen that in Europe.

Moslem leaders here in America have spoken
out; said that they would like to have Shari’ah be a governing force in
certain domestic issues, then our message is to them that they are not
welcome.

If they have come here as I say, to honor and obey;
submit to the Constitution of the United States, then that is fine. We
are just concerned about that radical element:
we are concerned about
jihad and we are concerned about Shari’ah.

 

Imam  Al-Qazwini, you lead the
largest mosque in North America;  what do you want Terry Jones to
know about Islam?

 

Well, first of all I would like to ask
Pastor ‘Terry Jones to define for us what it is
that he means when he
speaks about Shari’ah.

 

Well, what I actually mean–I’m talking
about any form of government; whether it be Shari’ah, my knowledge of
that is of course somewhat limited, but I realize that it  is a
very brutal form of punishment. It involves stoning, it involves other
very cruel forms of punishment

But it not only has to do with Shari’ah, whether it
be any other  religion that has any form of governmental force
adapted to it–connected to it, then, of course, we are against
that.

We believe that the United States can only be
governed by the Constitution.  As I said, I spent thirty years in
Europe, I traveled around the world–I have seen and believe that the
United States of America is the greatest country in the world.
But it is only great because we have the Constitution. One of the
great aspects of that Constitution is the freedom of speech.
[Crosstalk.]

 

But I don’t think that the Imam would
disagree with you.

 

No., definitely.

 

Then of course we have no
problem.

 

Why then this problem, Pastor Terry
Jones, why this commotion you are causing in the world and in
Florida?  You burned the Koran three weeks ago and of course you
live in a free country and you are entitled to your opinion and every
action you do.  But for someone who calls himself a Pastor,
someone who speaks in the name of Jesus–Jesus was a great messenger
who asked his followers to  embrace others–to love his enemies–
and I think someone who calls himself Pastor
–I don’t think you have moral grounds to burn the Koran, a divine
book
that respects and glorifies
Jesus
whom you speak in
his name..  If you read the Koran that you burned three weeks
ago–one month ago, you will find out that almost on every page in the
Koran there is a verse in the Koran glorifying Jesus, so I feel
what you did three weeks ago was an insult against Jesus;
against your own faith because if you
really believe in Jesus then the Koran glorifies Jesus.  so when
you burn the Koran you are insulting Jesus.   That’s insulting
Christianity.

 

Lets look at Shari’ah law as we
understand it, here is a definition  “Law based on the Koran that
lays down certain duties and penalties for Muslims.  “But its much
more than that, Imam.

 

I think what Pastor Jones needs to
know–he needs to get educated. of the meaning of the words he is
talking about.

It seems that he is well misinformed  bout
things he has been talking about without having an accurate
understanding of them.

 

Have you read the Koran?

 

I have read parts of the Koran but
there is no doubt I have never claimed to be an expert on the
Koran.  But there are experts all around the world who definitely
have the same opinion…[Crosstalk.]

 

Well, here’s an expert right now right
next to you.

 

That the Koran can, at times, lead to
violent terrorist activities, but that’s not the point.  The point
is I am making a statement- I am warning against Shaari’ah and against
jihad– that is a very valid point and that is what we are willing to
do if there is no such thing.  [Crosstalk.]
But in so doing are you not labeling
everyone who…

 

Absolutely not! I made that very very
clear; we have talked before, I have made it very clear thet there are
probably millions
of Moslems who are peaceful
,
who do not desire
that.   But there is a radical element of Islam that can not
s be denied.  We are not saying he is radical, we are not saying
that the Islamic Center here is radical, we are not saying the Moslems
in Dearborn are radical but there is no doubt about it, ah, there is
radical– we burned a book on March the  twentieth, we burned a
book –seven thousand miles away–it is a book–I do not care how holy
you think it is; it is still a book; it is not flesh and blood, it does
not live, it does not breathe, we burned a book and seven thousand
miles away people were killed, so something is definitely wrong.
[Crosstalk.] What we are saying is we are demonstrating against that.

 

Do you feel you have blood on your
hands; because of what you did here in the U.S.A. twelve innocent
people were killed ?

 

Oh, absolutely not.  What we do
believe, we believe those people and those governments should be held
accountable.

We believe that our President, who has done a very poor job so far, we
believe that our President should not only speak out against the
radical element of Islam, we have got to call these countries to
accountability in the U.N. Pakistan, Afghanistan, Indonesia; they have
to change their laws–to adapt their laws to human rights or they
should be removed from the U.N.

 

Reverend Rowe, let me bring you in here
because there are zealots in every faith; he calls himself a Christian,
so do you, you read the same Bible ; why the a difference in attitudes?

 

Well, I am here because I am not trying
to defend violence anywhere on the part of the Christian Taliban
or
anybody else; I am here to say that what happened burning the Koran did
not just burn the Koran, it burned the Sermon on
the Mount
,
it burned
every statement that Jesus made about loving
enemies
,

about … if you
think people are your
enemies
, whether its Shari’ah law or whatever it
is, the statement is very clear, “you have heard it said you shall love
your neighbor and hate your enemy but I say to you: love your enemies
and pray for those who persecute you.”

I don’t happen to think that I have the same enemies
you do, but if those are your enemies, the worst thing that happens
here is that somebody might think that Christianity actually supports
what you did.

I am here to say that there is nothing in the Gospel
that I read that  that supports the burning of the Koran

and, if
you knew what was happening; given what happened on September 11th,
you
had to know there  would be violence as a result of the burning; I
think the blood is on your hands, for every ounce that was spilled,
because if you knew that your act was gonna create violence,
then the
violence is your violence .

You can not just duck it and say that someone else
did the killing when you knew that your act was going to create the
killing.

and I think that, in fact, you burned a whole lot more than the Koran,
you burned
So I think first of all we have to say I don’t own your version of
Christianity at all every
statement of Jesus Christ about
non-violence
.

We just came out of Holy Week in which Jesus walked
into a very violent city on a donkey in peace and the peaceful Jesus
that I know would never have done what you did. And you knew, because
of  all the outpouring of September 11th, that it was going
to create death and I that death is on [Crosstalk.]

 

That’s an important question and you
call yourself a Christian; would Jesus Christ have done what you
did?

 

converted to Christianity.  They
brought books that they thought were dangerous, they brought magic
books, Well
I think for one thing we’re definitely getting sidetracked and another
thing; I think definitely that he would.  In Acts 19:19 we see
very clearly that people [brought book] sworth great sums of money and
they burned
them.

We see Jesus went into the Temple; threw out the
money changers.  We see every t8ime in the Old Testament that a
new King, a Godly King, came into place, he went down and tore down the
high places.

But I think we are missing the point: we are here
not to burn the Koran, we are not here to discuss the burning of the
Koran, we are here to send a very clear message to the radical element
of Islam: that is our message. Just a few months ago we talked about
burning the Koran and then there is violence. Radical Islam does not
need an excuse.  Coptic Christians came out of their churches
after a service, and they were just simply killed. We have to
remember the radical element of Islam has been killing people for
hundreds and hundreds of years.  Every single thing [Crosstalk.]

 

We are talking about that radical
element.

 

But why choose a place of peace to
stage that protest?  We are going to talk more about that; about
the legal issues involved when we come back…

 

A wonderful demonstration today: Jews
Muslims, Christians joined hands together at the Mosque today. And yet
there are many Americans who fear Islam and what it represents.
I believe they fear Islam because of
people like Pastor Terry Jones who are working on their paranoia, who
are making monster  out of Islam.  I would respectfully ask
Pastor Terry Jones to go and read the Koran instead of burning the
Koran and he would be amazed and surprised from the commonalities that
exist between Islam and Christianity.

The Problem is Pastor Jones has not read the Koran,
he has no knowledge of the Koran therefore he is trying to make a
monster out of the Koran
and by that he is terrifying
Americans
from
Islam and by telling them that Islam is the danger.

Now no one is denying that there are radicals in
Islam as there are radicals in Christianity; I consider him one of the
radicals in
Christianity
.


We have people like Timothy McVeigh who
killed
hundreds of innocent people in Oklahoma ten-fifteen years ago in the
name of Jesus
.
  We have people who committed all kinds
of
heinous
crimes in the name of the church and in the name of Jesus, peace be
upon him.  Would I hold Christianity responsible for that? No! I
am not going to do that because I understand in every faith there is a
fringe group who use
religion
for their own interest and Islam is no
exception.  Why
I would hold 1.5 billion Muslims responsible for
the acts of a small fringe group that has been distorting Islam? 

But that does not mean Islam should be held responsible for
them.       We all agree that there are people
who have hijacked
Islam
and gave it a bad name.  So I would invite
Pastor Jones to learn about the Koran, learn about Islam and be able to
distinguish between those fringe groups who in no way would represent
the mainstream of Islam; a divine faith
that
has so much to offer to
this world and to humanity.  The divine faith that speaks highly
of Christianity and of Judaism
.

We in our religion believe that someone who does not
believe in Jesus, who does not believe in Moses he can not claim to be
Muslim, so in order to be a true Muslim you have to embrace Jesus and
his message; you have to embrace Moses and his message and it seems
that Pastor Jones  does not get that.

Now I want to go back to the Shari’ah law that he
has been talking about.  We ask him how does he define the
Shari’ah law; he says that he thinks the Shari’ah law is the brutal
punishment.  Now what brutal punishment
is he talking about
?
Is he speaking about the stoning?  Now let me, for his reference,
the stoning was
referred to in the Bible, not in the Koran
.

Now, if he is talking about what the Taliban did in
Afghanistan fifteen years ago,  when they were stoning people:
well, Taliban does not represent Islam, everyone

knows that the Taliban rule does not represent the spirit of
Islam.  I am someone who numerous times condemned what Taliban did
against people in Afghanistan and I said that these people are
self-declared religious leaders who are not recognized by the
mainstream of Islam, so he can not also hold Islam responsible for the
act of Taliban in Afghanistan when they were stoning people.

Here in America we have six million Muslims; I
challenge pastor Jones if he can bring me one Muslim in the United
States  who would say that we have not abided by the U.S.
laws.  All these Muslims are abided by the U.S. laws, so let me
ask him this, of course: there is a reference to the stoning in the
Bible, does that mean the Christian in the United States now are
calling for implementing stoning in the United States?  This is, I
think, the wrong analogy.  So I believe that his understanding of
the Shari’ah law is definitely distorted, he does not have accurate
understanding of what he is telling people; what he is talking about.

He can demonstrate against radical Islam,
that’s his right he can do that and he is entitled to do that but I
also would like to ask him, as I always do when I talk about extremism
and radicalism in other faiths,  that I would condemn radicalism
and extremism in my faith first so he has to do the same thing when he
talks about radicals and he means to rally people against radical
Islam, would he also do the same thing by rallying people against
radical Christians?  Would he tolerate those who go and blow up
abortion clinics
here, what he would call them?  are
these
radicals; why would he not not speak out against them, why he chose to
be silent about those
radicals who call themselves Christians but he only chose to attack
those who call themselves radicals in Islam.  So I think this is a
double standard and someone who calls himself Pastor and religious leader; he has
to take the higher ground.

 

Let me ask both of you: what do you
call someone who straps a bomb to himself to kill innocent people; do
you call them martyrs or do you call them terrorists?

 

I call them murderer; the Koran that
Pastor Jones burned three weeks ago calls these people murderer and the
Koran is very clear that if you kill one innocent person you will be
viewed by God as if you have killed the entire mankind.   So
of course, someone who kills innocent people
is considered a murderer
in the eyes of God.

And by the way, I would like to take this
opportunity to condemn the killings that took place in Afghanistan
three weeks ago  when Pastor Terry Jones burned the Koran.
But I want to say one thing: When Pastor Terry Jones those who
committed that crime and I unequivocally condemn that attack, it was
carried out by lunatic Muslims, these people are not normal people,
these people are lunatics, but who pushed them to do that; someone who
calls himself Pastor, someone
who calls himself religious leader, he pushed them to do that, so yes,
I agree that his …there is blood on his hands for pushing these
lunatics to kill those innocent people at the United nations
Headquarters in Afghanistan and I hold him also partially responsible
for these killings.  .

Ok, Reverend jones, your
response?

 

yeah, sure,  since 9/11 theres
been over seventeen thousand successful terrorist attacks.  I mean
to hold us responsible for what someone does seven thousand miles

away is totally ridiculous.  You can see that in our own American
History, in our recent history we had the movement by Reverend Martin
Luther King Jr.  During that movement, many people were killed but
nobody would say it was Reverend martin Luther King Jr.’s fault.

I think that the Imam–I think that the problem
there
is they talk the talk but they don’t walk the walk,  they talk all
this peace but there’s really no proof of that.

As he said, here in America you have seven million;
you have nine million, so as long as they are in the minority of course
what are they gonna say? “We wanna rise up; we wanna take over”?
“Islam means submission, world domination”, is that what they are going
to say?

He’s not saying that.

 

I didn’t say he, I said they.  Is
that what they are going to say? No! You look at Moslem dominated
countries, its not important what a minority says in another country as
long as that minority is a minority, it is important [Cross talk. ]
it is important what a minority does when it becomes a majority; how
does it then treat the minority under them?  And in Islam
dominated countries; in Koran dominated countries, we do not see this
peace, peace peace, [Cross talk.]

 

Is what you are doing the way to treat
minorities in this country?  I’m not so sure it is.

 

Reverend Rowe, you heard Reverend Jones
compare himself to Martin Luther King.

 

Yeah, I think its blasphemy; I think it
is an absolute lie and its a lie on Jesus and not just Martin Luther
King and what he died for, he was non violent.  The act of burning
the Koran was a violent
act
; he can’t duck that, the people who died
died and he knew that that violence was going to happen.  I think
that blood is on his hands and for him to even say the word Martin
Luther King and the non violent movement that had to do with martin
Luther King–its simply blasphemy and its Islamophobia; its right up
there with racism.  I tell you this man is lying about
Christianity, he’s lying about Martin Luther King and he’s lieing
about Islam.  he didn’t just burn the Koran, he burned the Sermon
on the Mount. 
He burned everything I believe in

when he did that
and everything the Imam believes in  and everything that Judaism
believes in and he sits here trying to protect us from a force that
does not exist.   Can you name one neighborhood in this
city or in this country that is [under] Shari’ah law? Can you name one
person who us under
Shari’ah law
? I can’t and you can’t either. He has
created a fear that has nothing to be afraid of and so  that he
can get attention and we’re here because the media is gonna [Cross
talk.]

 

You can settle this right now.  On
Let it Rip, you can agree, to tomorrow, go into the Mosque, join hands
with the Imam and the people there and rally for peace. Will you try to
do that instead of denouncing Islam tomorrow?

 

No, we will not, but we can invite him
to come and join us against terrorism, against the radical element,
against whatever he wants to call it, he can come and join us because
he is [Cross talk.]

ignited a firestorm

Pastor Jones did nothing of the sort; he held a four
hour trial of the Qur’an, found it guilty of incitement to genocidal
violence and sentenced it to burning. His associate, Pastor Sapp
burned  the Qur’an.

The subsequent riots were not caused by the trial
& burning, they resulted from incendiary sermons at Jumah Salat.
The rabble were roused to riot by their Imams, not by Pastor Jones.

insulted millions

Pastor Jones accurately described the Qur’an, the
doctrines enshrined in it and the violence it incites. Muslims perceive
insult because they are heavily invested in Islam.  Islam is given
to them as the ultimate in good: guidance to faith in Allah, peace,
prosperity & justice.  In reality, it is enslavement to Satan,
a life of barren poverty and predation upon the human race.

welcome here

No sane person who knows what Islam is and what
Muslims are & do will welcome them here, regardless of their
birthplace, citizenship or immigration status.  Islam is a way of
life, not a religion. The deen of Islam is couched in terms of religion
in order to conceal its true nature.  The “original religion” of Islam is jihad.  Jihad is “war against non-Muslims“.

Believers are only
those
who “strive with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh“.  Muslims are under Allah’s threat of eternal damnation if they do not engage
in jihad.  Engaging in jihad is their get out of Hell free card
which will save them from a “painful torment“.

Muslims who “take
any step

to injure or enrage disbelievers are promised extra credit towards an
upgrade to their seat in Allah’s Celestial Bordello. Islam’s founding
Profiteer declared that he was “made victorious with terror“.  Muslims are commanded
to emulate a terrorist
.

Moe got his income with his spear. Moe was made
wealthy “through conquests“.  Do you welcome the
presence of people who esteem him as the best and greatest of men and consider him to be
their role model?


obey the Constitution

Islam rejects man made laws including the
Constitution. Only Allah’s Shari’ah
is acceptable to Islam.  The Qur’an is their constitution; the
hadith are their laws.  Compare the table of contents of Sahih Bukhari to the that of Reliance of the Traveller.
Cruel & unusual punishments are unconstitutional, but lapidation,
amputation & lashing are required by Shari’ah.  The two are
not compatible; they are polar opposites.

radical element

That phrase offends me because it is supremely
dishonest.  Postulating the existence of a “radical element”
assumes the existence of a “moderate” mainstream Islam opposed to
“radicalism” or “extremism”.  Jihad is not radical, it is
mainstream: “ordained
for
” Muslims though they “dislike it”.

Terrorism is not “radical”, it is mainstream.
Allah said that he would “cast
terror
” and that he “cast terror” so that “a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them)
you made captives
”  Allah commanded Muslims to treat victims
harshly so as to “strike
terror
” into future victims.  he commanded Muslims to maximize
the strength of their army to “terrify
thereby
” the enemies of Allah.   How was moe “made
victorious”?

The Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides were
not “radical”, they were mainstream. Allah set “great
slaughter
” as Moe’s price of admission to his Celestial
Bordello.  Moe slaughtered 800 Jews who had surrendered after a two week siege.

define Shari’ah

Literally: “path to life giving waters”. It is
Islamic law, founded on Allah’s permissions, prohibitions &
imperatives in the Qur’an, exemplified by Moe’s sunnah and extended by
the consensus of the Ulema.  The most widely accepted codification
of Shari’ah is Reliance of the Traveller, a 1251 page volume
which you
can obtain from Amazon.  In many aspects, it is the most detailed
though Hedaya excells it in a few, such as rules related to sexual
intercourse with slaves.  Hedaya has been summarized in two
volumes which can be obtained from Amazon or read on the web, but it is
arcane, archaic and dense.  I recommend reading the first two
chapters of Volume II, Book IX. beginning with page 140 where you will see the rules of war
confirmed and amplified.

If you prefer shorter, easier to read books, turn to Risala, the Maliki school’s fiqh.

divine book

Moe claimed that he received the Qur’an from Allah,
through Jibril.  Of course, nobody else saw or heard Jibril.
There are a few things Muslims do not want you to know about how Moe
received his inspiration & revelations.  Moe had epileptic
seizures: snorting like a young camel, sweating, quivering lips & tongue.

Sometimes revelations came in dreams, sometimes he heard a voice and sometimes he heard a bell ringing in his
head. He received revelations while in bed with Aisha, but not with his other wives.  Aisha was wise
to him: “It seems to me that your Lord hastens to satisfy your
desire
.”.

glorifies Jesus

The Qur’an denies the patrimony,
deity [“not more than a slave“], crucifixion, death & resurrection of
Jesus.  In one hadith, Moe depicts Jesus as inferior to himself, unworthy to intercede for sinners.  In
another hadith, Jesus is depicted as a genocidal warlord who will
fight the people” for the cause of Allah and
destroy Christianity. Ibn Kathir, in his tafsir of Surah Al-A’raf 7:167,
informs us that just before the end of the world, “In the future, the
Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary,
will kill the Jews.
“:

The Qur’an contains 113 surahs; Jesus is mentioned
in 19 of them.  Surah Al-Baqarah, the longest of surah, contains
286 ayat, of which #s 87, 156 & 253 mention Jesus.


insult against Jesus

.      Sayed Hassan Al-Qazwini insulted the
intelligence of the  Fox 2 audience  by asserting that
burning a blasphemous text which deprecates Jesus is an insult against
Jesus and Christianity.  Allah denies paternity; insulting God by
claiming to be him, insulting Jesus by denial of his deity and
insulting Christians by denial of the tenets of our faith.
Burning a book which insults Jesus is not an insult to Jesus..

peaceful Muslims

Muslims who abjure offensive  conquest
insult  Allah and Islam by denying that Allah knows best.  War against non-Muslims is ordained for Muslims.  Islam is inseverable,
an all or nothing package deal: “Then
do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest?

Then what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except
disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they
shall be consigned to the most
grievous torment
.”

The Muslim who does not go to war when called is
going to Hell.  “If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will
replace you by another people”.  “He who does not join the warlike expedition (jihad),
or equip, or looks well after a warrior’s family when he is away, will be smitten by Allah with a sudden calamity.”

Why does any peace loving person worship a demon who
plans to damn him for shirking offensive conquest?  You love
peace, Allah loves war; what do you have in common? Why do you
remain enslaved to him?

Christian Taliban

Taliban means “students of the Qur’an”.  The
Qur’an is an anti-Christian text; Christians read it to know their
enemy. Taliban whip and stone adulterous women, amputate the hands of
thieves and poison school girls.  What Christians do those
things?

Sermon on the Mount

If Pastor Jones burned the Sermon on the Mount, then he
burned the Bible.  No, he burned the Qur’an!  Show me the
Surah & ayeh containing the Sermon on the Mount; I want to see it!
My search for it was unsuccessful.

loving enemies

In which Surah & Ayeh does the Qur’an contain
Christ’s command to love your enemies?  Where does Allah emulate
it?  Show me; I want to verify it!

How do you square “love your enemies with” “to terrify thereby the enemy of God and your enemy”  Which book did Pastor Jones
burn?

your enemies

Reverend Rowe, are people who curse
Christians
your enemies?  Is a  god who intends to take
Muslims out of Hell and replace them with Christians your enemy? Is a god
who curses
Christians
your enemy?

Gospel supports burning

Did you search the Book of Acts?  19:19 Many of them also which used curious arts
brought their books together,
and burned them before all
men: and they counted the price of them, and found it fifty thousand
pieces of silver.

September 11

Exactly what did we do to provoke the accursed
abomination?  Exactly what did the founders do, between 1776 and
1815, to provoke the Barbary Pirates?  Did you know that the
Barbary Pirates said it was because it is written
in their laws
?  Do you know where it is written in their laws?


create violence

Violence is created by those who engage in it, not
by Pastor Jones.  He did not tell anyone to riot. He did not urge
anyone to murder.  He tried, condemned and executed a book which
exhorts men to murder, wage war, rape and pillage.

On what day of the week did the riots occur?
At what time of the day did they occur?  On what day of the week
and what time of day do the Imams  deliver their
kutbah?   The same pattern was followed when Hell was raised
over the Motoons.

create the
killing

You are creating  killing, Reverend Rowe, by
giving Muslims carte blanche to raise Hell and project the blame onto
their critics; ‘Pastor Jones made us do it.’.

Christ: non-violence

Reverend Rowe, exactly where in the Qur’an do you
find Christ’s statements about non-violence?  Please cite the
Surah & ayeh numbers so we can look up the references.

What contravenes Christ’s teaching more than “Jihad
is ordained for you…”, “fight them until”, fight those who until”,
“kill them wherever you find them” and “fight those of the disbelievers
nearest you” ?

make a monster of the
Qur’an

The Qur’an is what it is: a hate & war manual;
we can make nothing of it, we can not change what it is.  Read it;
discover what it is and what it inculcates & incites.  I will
make it easy for you.

“It doesn’t say that; doesn’t mean that;
mistranslated &
misinterpreted.”  Prove it!!! Take your case up with the experts;
Islamic scholars:

Who knew the meaning of the Qur’an better than the
man who first recited it?  Is jihad inner struggle against your
ego or is it offensive conquest?  Read Sahih Bukhari’s Book of Jihad
and see for yourself.   What did the Profiteer say and do
about jihad?  Can you obtain a clue from the codified oral
traditions of Moe’s companions?

radicals in Christianity

In which New Testament book,  chapter &
verse did Jesus Christ command his disciples to wage offensive war,
engage in terrorism and commit genocide?  In which New Testament
book, chapter & verse did he exemplify such acts for his disciples
to emulate?

Moe did those things, Jesus did not; Muslims thus
engaged obey Allah and emulate Moe, Christians thus engaged contravene
the teaching of Jesus.

Timothy McVeigh

What did Tim say or do to involve Jesus in his
massacre?  Did he utter and publish a statement dedicating the
bombing to Christ?  Did he shout “Jesus is Lord!”?  What
evidence of religious motivation for the attack do you have?  Show
it!!!

use religion

Who would use religion for personao emolument? Who
would contrive a ‘religion’ for his personal emolument &
empowerment?  Who would contrive a ‘religion’ for the purpose of
accruing income, wealth and sex slaves?  Who did that???  To
whom do the spoils belong?  How could an impotent stone idol eat
looted food, ride looted camels or sport with captured women?
What was Moe’s prime motivating factor?  What did Allah promise
Moe?  What did Allah deliver?  How was Moe made
wealthy?  Who were spoils made lawful for?  Who received the
keys to the treasures of the world from Allah?

distorting Islam

What did Allah say about jihad?  What did Moe
say and do about jihad?  What did Allah say about terror?
What did Allah do about terror? What did Moe say and do about
terror? What does Shari’ah say about jihad?

Exactly what is Islam that terrorists have distorted
it?  If Islam is not what Allah & Moe said & did, then
what is it??

hijacked Islam

Who hijacked Islam? When and where did they hijack
Islam?  Read the questions asked and answers listed under the
heading distorting Islam and get a
clue.

divine faith

What is divine about Islam? How can the product of
hallucinatory seizures & situational scripture be divine?
Refer to the evidence linked under the heading of divine book above.

speaks highly of
Christianity

When spewing a rapid fire stream of malignant
malarkey in a half hour t.v. show with three other guests, it is easy
to get away with telling big lies.  Pastor Jones did not have
sufficient air time to refute that lie, but I can refute it in this
blog post.  Allah leaves no doubt about his attitude toward
Judaism & Christianity.  When Muslims attend the five
obligatory salat, they recite Surah Al-Fatiha 17 times each day,
reminding Allah why he wants to burn us.

  • 1:6.
    Guide us to the Straight Way

    1:7.
    The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of
    those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went
    astray (such as the Christians).

We “earned anger” & “went astray”. See how highly Islam speaks of
us?

Islam curses us, beyond the compulsory salat.

  • 2:161.
    Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it
    is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind,
    combined.
  • 9:30.
    And the Jews say: ‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians
    say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths.
    They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on
    them, how they are deluded away from the truth!

Islam curses us, that must be  high praise indeed.  It also
calls us the “worst of living creatures”.

  • 8:55. Verily, The worst of moving (living)
    creatures before Allâh are those who disbelieve , – so they shall not
    believe.
  • 98:6.
    Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and
    Prophet Muhammad ()) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and
    Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are
    the worst of creatures.


brutal punishment

Shari’ah prescribes the death penalty for apostasy
in Reliance of the Traveller Book O8.1. O14.1 prescribes amputation of the right hand for
theft.  O12.2 prescribes stoning for adultery.

stoning

Yes, lapidation is mentioned in the Bible, but not
in the Qur’an because a sheep ate the verse of rajab..

  • John 8:7
    So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto
    them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at
    her.
  • Sahih Muslim 17.4194
    has Caliph Umar verifying the recital of the verse of stoning and the
    fact that it was carried out in the time of the Profit.
  • Sunan Ibn Majah, Volume 3, page 113
    • 1944. It was narrated that

      ‘Ashah said: “The Verse of

      stoning and of breast feedmg an

      adult ten times was revealed, and

      the paper was with me under my

      pillow. When the Messenger of Allah died, we were

      preoccupied with his death, and a

      tame sheep came in and ate it.” (Hasan)

  • Sahih Muslim17.4196 and the immediate context
    indicated that Moe practiced lapidation.
  • See Sunan Abu Dawud 38.4339 for further confirmation.

Moe ordered lapidation, Jesus  stopped one;
which is morally superior?

blow up
abortion clinics

How many Christians shoot abortionists or blow up
their clinics?  How does the number of such incidents compare to
the number of terrorist attacks by Muslims?  In which New
Testament book, chapter & verse did Jesus command his disciples to
kill abortion doctors or bomb their clinics?

The accusation is a form of the argumentum tu-quoque
fallacy; a diversion, not a defense.  Nothing that any Christian
has done in contravention of the teaching of Jesus subtracts anything
from the intrinsic evil of Islam.

kills innocent people

Imam Al-Qazwini provided a prime example of kitman:
Islamic deception by obfuscation.  He slyly refers to Surah
Al-Ma’idah 5:32,
obscuring 5:33
which prescribes punishments for ‘waging war against Allah’.
What is the meaning of “wage war against Allah”?  For
the answer, we must turn to Tafsir Ibn kathir: “`Wage war’ mentioned here
means, oppose and contradict,
and it includes disbelief,
blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways.”

If you do not believe in Allah, you are waging war
against him: subject to decapitation, crucifixion, amputation or
expulsion; you are not innocent. Only
Muslims can be innocent. 

violent act

Detonating a bomb in a crowd is a violent act.
Shooting people is a violent act. Rioting is violent. Burning a book
which is your own personal property, under controlled conditions is not
a violent act. Pastor Jones did no harm in judging and destroying a
Qur’an. There is no logical connection between that act and the riots
incited by Imams in Afghanistan.

The outrageous hyperbole of Reverent Rowe serves to
give Muslims a free pass for anything they do; a ready excuse. They can
simply project their own evil intentions onto innocent, non-violent
people.

everything I believe in

What do you believe in, Reverend Rowe?
Christianity is defined in the Gospels, Acts & letters of the
Apostles, not in the Qur’an.  Islam portrays Jesus as a genocidal
warlord. If Pastor Jones burned what you believe in, then you are a
Muslim, not a Christian; an apostate and impostor.

under Shari’ah

In the last three decades, 50
trial and appellate cases involving Shari’ah have been heard in
American courts
.

April 19, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Radicalism?, Islamic Terrorism, Jesus, Jihad, Liars, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The hypocrisy of Congressional Bigotry


The hypocrisy of Congressional Bigotry

Fatwa on Islam brought this video to my attention. I had read a little
about the controversy but had not delved deeply into it. I can’t let
this slide by without a blast of the torch. We find Christopher S.
Murphy on the floor of the House, wasting precious time.

December 19, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Radicalism?, Islamic Terrorism, Jihad, Political Correctness, Politics, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Imam Rauf’s Veiled Threat


In the fog of ideological & psychological warfare, with conflicting claims of  a face saving compromise which would relocate the Ground Zero Mosque  of triumph and save the Florida Qur’ans from a fiery fate,  we need to get back to basics and focus on the significant core issues.

The Imam behind the Ground Zero Mosque of Triumph, Feisal Abdul Rauf, issued a  thinly veiled threat in an interview with The Larry King Show. The Washington post included a video clip in their article., headlined: “Imam Rauf: National security hinges on Mosque debate“.

The Post placed this quote  above the video: “Our national security now hinges on how we negotiate this, how we speak about it.”

This was a particularly difficult interview to transcribe because both the interviewer and interviewee spoke rapidly and  with soft voices.  The video buffers too slowly on my connection, my  eustachian tubes were not clearing, and my hearing aids are incompatible with my headset.  I had to use the telecoils, and my monitor is louder than my headset.  I did not get everything, but this should be close enough to convey the important meaning.

…”But I also have a responsibility. If we move from that location the story will be that the radicals have taken over the discourse, the headline in the Islamic world will be that Islam is under attack. And I am less concerned by the radicals in America than I am concerned  by the radicals in the Muslim world. … the danger from the radicals in the MW to our national security–to the nationals security of our troops- I have a niece who works in the Army in [inaudible] Iraq– the concern for American citizens who live and work and travel overseas will increasingly be compromised if the radicals are strengthened. 

If we do move it, it will strengthen the argument of the radicals to recruit  and their increasing aggression. The idea of [inaudible] is to create something like a Muslim Y. The YMCA was created one hundred and thirty years ago. to improve relationships between what was then called the American protestant religions by having young men and young women, of course they were separate at that time; YMCA/YWCA, common bond you know, by doing sports together and other programs together. [inaudible]
And that second street Y was an attempt by the Jewish community  to create a center where you’d create that kind of bonding.   We are now, today, where the Jewish community and the Catholic community was maybe seventy years ago, a century ago and this is our time; our turn to do that.

(What’s on the table now?)
The biggest issue is the national security issue.
(How do you pull out without looking like you’ve lost?)

Without making it look both in this country and in the Muslim world.  You must remember that what we do is watched all over the world.  And we are very engaged with the Muslim world.  And our security is really number one, our national security, our personal security is extremely important. And this issue has become now a national security issue. And therefore in our conversations, in our decision making process, we have to weigh many many factors and that has been dominant among them.

(Is there a middle ground that has you pull out of the center and do something else? that’s what it sounds like you are saying.)  We are discussing many things right now but, you know, we haven’t found yet an option  that would work in a safe way.

(What are … what you are considering?)

As I said,. we consider everything in life. but we have to be very cautious here because the voices of the radicals have ratcheted up and we must make sure that the moderates take over the conversation.

(Given what you know now, would you have built?)

As I mentioned it, this story is not new. People knew about it.  …(Right, but given what you know now would you have said ‘listen, lets not do it there because…’  because it sounds like  you are saying, in retrospect , you wouldn’t have done it? )

Well,yes, if…if…(You would not have done it?)
If I knew this would happen, this would cause this kind of pain, I wouldn’t have done it.  My life has been devoted to peace making,

(…There are so many people who say… if you are saying it was a mistake, then why can’t you get out of it and not do it?)

because we have to now make sure that whatever we do actually results in greater peace, not in greater conflict.

(Why do you think this structure is causing all this controversy now? )

Well there is a certain amount of anti-Islamic sentiment in this country (what now?) and we have seen it in the attacks upon mosques in various parts of the country in the last several weeks. So it is clear that this issue is not just about our center which is an attempt to create peace between Muslims and  non-Muslims but this has aroused a certain anti-Islam sentiment which is unfortunate in this country–we need to look at it and have a discourse about it and make sure this does not dominate the discourse between us because Americans believe fundamentally  and in a very fundamental strong way about freedom of religion, about separation of governments and churches, in separation of church and state which means the power of the government should not be used to coerce people to believe in any religion but it should be used to defend and protect religious rights and freedoms.  So this is the conversation we need to have right now.

(Lets talk about money: one hundred million dollars is the price tag for this Islamic cultural center, where are you going to get the money?)

Well we have yet to raise a capital campaign…(You have no money for it yet?)

We haven’t raised any money for it yet.  .

(Where will you get the money?)

We’ll get the money from whatever sources we can, domestically especially, and be very transparent about how we raise the money. This has been something that we have committed ourselves to . (Meaning you will list whoever is giving you money?) Yes.  ( Will you turn down money from people who give money to say, HAMAS?) Absolutely. (No question about it; anyone who gives money to HAMAS can not give money to you ?) We will do whatever is absolutely correct and legal and safe thing   to do.

(Which means what exactly? Because that’s an extra condition?)  You see, I’m the visionary behind it, I’m not the actual builder, I’m not the financial expert, I’m not  the legal expert on these things, but I have a vision here of  establishing something which I know, in my heart of hearts, will be a powerful instrument of peace.

(  Who would you not take money from, who would you say no to, who would you turn away?)

We would turn it from anybody who was deemed to be a danger to this process.  (People I think, here in New York and around the country would say ‘ that is sacred land, that is a special place for everyone in America– is that a step toward peace?) As Clyde Haberman [sp?] and many many people have said, “look what exists in that neighborhood”, look what exists around the corner.  ( Oh, I believe you, I’ve lived downtown, so I know the neighborhood very well. )

So lets be clear, calling this particular block sacred  ground is and what exists there… you know…(strip clubs and delis, I’ve been there a million times, but I think when people call it sacred ground, they’re saying something terrible  happened on this spot and and we’ve…)

We’ve got to be fair you can’t say a place that has strip joints is sacred ground. We’ve got to be just, we’ve got to speak the truth we’ve got to have justice for everybody,  we’re a country of justice for all, not just for non-Muslims only or some groups and not for others This is what America is all about, Solidad. We’ve got to really mean what we say and say what our values  are truly about.

This isn’t… the discourse has been hijacked by people who say “no”.

(you’ve heard about this Pastor in Florida, Terry Jones,who is proposing burning Qur’ans on 9/11,  what do you think of that?)

I would plead with him to seriously consider what he is doing. (Why?)  Its going to feed to the radicals in the Muslim world.  Its dangerous, General Petraeus has said that. It is something that is not the right thing to do on that ground. …
.
(Do you  think he has a right to do it?)

And more importantly, well, we have freedom in this country, freedom of speech, but with freedom comes responsibility.  It is a famous saying to shout fire in a crowded theatre, this is dangerous for our national security, and also the un-Christian thing to do.  Jesus Christ didn’t teach us to do that, we Muslims have a … we look to the example of our Prophet- to our Prophet’s sunnah. Many Christians say, ‘What would Jesus do”
Jesus taught us to turn the other cheek, Jesus taught us to love your enemy, we are not your enemies.  This is what Jesus taught us to do, and I would like to suggest that  you know–we all have to live  by the highest principles of our faith traditions

  • “If we move from that location the story will be that the radicals have taken over the discourse”

I presume he means  us, the Americans who resist the erection of a victory Mosque on the scene of the  accursed abomination.

  • “the headline in the Islamic world will be that Islam is under attack.”

The finger of blame switches from those who are poking a gigantic middle finger in our eye to those of us who are vociferously resisting  the attack.

  • “I am concerned  by the radicals in the Muslim world. “…
    • “the danger from the radicals in the MW to our national security”

“Radical” Muslims are likely to throw stones and bombs at our troops, assault tourists and businessmen overseas, and terrorize us at home because we vocally resist the erection of  their symbol of triumph in the place where they murdered 2700 people nine years ago.   We are accused of provoking our tormentors by resisting them.   Does anyone else perceive the moral inversion performed in this case?

Muslims are taught that any step taken to injure or anger us is imputed to their credit as a deed of righteousness, to be weighed against their sins on Judgment Day.  You’d learn that fun fact in 9:120, if you’d read that damn Qur’an instead of ignoring or burning it. They don’t need any incentive from us to attack us.

  • “If we do move it, it will strengthen the argument of the radicals to recruit  and their increasing aggression.”

If they relocate the project, moderate Muslims will be radicalized and recruited by terrorists.  The difference between a moderate and a radical is that the latter is fully aware of Allah’s imperatives and seeks to implement them.  Moderates are either ignorant or indolent,  those whom Muhammad called hypocrites whose Islam goes no deeper than their throats.  They profess but do not practice.   We have been told that  relocating the project from Ground Zero will cause more Muslims to seek to implement Allah’s imperatives.  In that case, is there any real difference in the beliefs of radicals and moderates?

  • “The YMCA was created one hundred and thirty years ago. to improve relationships between what was then called the American protestant religions”…
    • “We are now, today, where the Jewish community and the Catholic community was maybe seventy years ago, a century ago and this is our time; our turn to do that.”

A Young Muslim’s Christian Association?  Oh, right, a Young Muslim’s Association.   The Y serves 45 million people in 120 countries. Guess which countries ain’t served.  No Y in Arabia or North Africa, why is that?  But we need another Muslim (terrorist) recruiting station in New York. Yeah, right.

  • “The biggest issue is the national security issue.”

How big is it?  How many more attacks, how much increase in the scale of those attacks? If that face saving compromise Pastor Terry Jones thought he had worked out was genuine, would that result in a national security problem?

  • “You must remember that what we do is watched all over the world.”
    • this issue has become now a national security issue.

The question was one of  relocating the project without the appearance of defeat. How about the reality?  It would be a strategic setback because any alternative location would not have the psychological effect of the Ground Zero location, it would contribute much less to the Muslim’s sense of triumph.  The answer speaks volumes.  Rauf is concerned about defeat in the eyes of the Ummah.  But anything that deflates their egos should bring about some reduction in recruitment and enthusiasm for terrorism. That would make a positive contribution to peace and security.  Strategy is inverted along with morality.

  • “we haven’t found yet an option  that would work in a safe way”

No options that would not increase the security risk?  We get more attacks unless the symbol of Islamic supremacy is erected on the site of the abomination?

  • “we have to be very cautious here because the voices of the radicals have ratcheted up and we must make sure that the moderates take over the conversation”

The emphasis is on “radicals” and “moderates”. The moderate voice is quiescent because “moderates” are not zealots; they are not empowered and motivated to speak out and act; they are passive.  The “radicals” have the mission, motivation and machine guns; they are activated.

Did anything escape your attention in that quote? Look again.  Who is Rauf concerned with?  Only Muslims; our perceptions, attitudes, feelings and interests don’t count, they are not under consideration. He ain’t interested in anyone but Muslims.

  • “If I knew this would happen, this would cause this kind of pain, I wouldn’t have done it.  My life has been devoted to peace making,”

Rauf was not expecting a vigorous, vociferous reaction.  He was not expecting intensive and extensive news coverage.  Did he make a war?  No, he made a controversy, and that ain’t exactly the polar opposite of “peace making”.  Of course, Muslims make peace by subjugating disbelievers. Peace follows victory.

  • “we have to now make sure that whatever we do actually results in greater peace, not in greater conflict.”

He can not admit defeat and back down because that would result in “greater conflict”.  If we surrender, that results in peace; if he surrenders, that results in conflict.  Got a clue yet?

  • “there is a certain amount of anti-Islamic sentiment in this country”
  • ” it is clear that this issue is not just about our center”
  • “make sure this does not dominate the discourse between us because Americans believe fundamentally  and in a very fundamental strong way about freedom of religion, about separation of governments and churches, in separation of church and state which means the power of the government should not be used to coerce people to believe in any religion but it should be used to defend and protect religious rights and freedoms.”

Nineteen Muslims hijacked four airliners and flew three of them into office buildings.  Their act was motivated by the preaching and example of Muhammad bin Abdullah, the founder of Islam.  Their act was celebrated by Muslims all over the world.  What sort of fool expects us to have a neutral or pro-Islamic sentiment after that?   A cockpit voice recorder was recovered, exposing  exclamations of “Allahu akhbar” as the flight crew was murdered.   People wondered why, and research was done; books and movies were created which expose the doctrines and practices of Islam.  Some of us looked up the Barbary Wars, and what we discovered in  the historical recored confirmed what we learned  from your texts and outraged us.

How is it possible to have a discourse not dominated by the fact that your demon demands that you conquer and subjugate us?   Freedom of religion means that we can choose any religion or none at all. Islam demands that it have a monopoly, that only Allah be worshiped.  The two are not compatible, they are polar opposites.

Separation of Church and state means that the two institutions are independent, they do not interfere in each other’s affairs. Islam demands that all law be Allah’s law, Shari’ah, not man made legislation.  That is the polar opposite of separation of church and state.   Freedom of religion and separation of church and state do not serve as your license to wage war on us or dominate us by out breeding us, subversion & sedition.

  • ( Will you turn down money from people who give money to say, HAMAS?) “Absolutely”. (No question about it; anyone who gives money to HAMAS can not give money to you ?) “We will do whatever is absolutely correct and legal and safe thing   to do.”
  • “We would turn it from anybody who was deemed to be a danger to this process.”

Wear your black dot garden gloves to keep a grip on this snake. Why is HAMAS an issue?  Rauf will not acknowledge the fact that it is a terrorist organization.  Neither would he acknowledge the fact, if asked, that there is no difference between HAMAS  and Islam.

Giving money to HAMAS is illegal. Taking money from HAMAS donors is not illegal.  Their willingness to donate to you  as well as  to HAMAS tells us  who & what you are. The fact that you want to disassociate yourself from them provides the same information.  But we already knew that you are Muslims.  What constitutes a “danger to this process” ?  The implication is that you would reject money from anyone whose reputation or associations would impair your false image of peaceful  moderation.

  • “We’ve got to be fair you can’t say a place that has strip joints is sacred ground.”

What makes any ground sacred?  What desecrates it?  If the flesh, bone & blood of your family and associates is finely divided and splattered over several city blocks by an aircraft  impact   and the subsequent collapse of  the impacted building,  are that place, those scattered remains and their memories any less sacred  to you than they would be in a consecrated cemetery  in your church yard?  In fact, there was a church on that site.  Is the site desecrated by the presence of strip joints and other business establishments which pre-existed the accursed abomination?

If your loved one and  colleagues were murdered by assassins motivated by the damnable doctrines of an accursed war cult, what is the effect on your psyche of the erection, on the site where the ash and smoke of your loved one settled, of a shrine where the war cult’s devotees will remind their  demon seventeen times every day of how your loved one and you have “earned” his wrath & “gone astray”; a place where they will curse us and supplicate their demon for “victory over the disbelieving folk”?  Does that or does that not impair the sanctity of the site more than a strip club around the corner?

  • “I would plead with him to seriously consider what he is doing. (Why?)  Its going to feed to the radicals in the Muslim world.  Its dangerous, General Petraeus has said that. It is something that is not the right thing to do on that ground. …”

Burning a Qir’an as a symbol of objection to the damnable doctrines enshrined therein and the accursed actions inspired thereby and to the erection of a  shrine to them  in a place where those  damnable doctrines and accursed actions resulted in more than 2000 deaths  “feeds radicals”  but burning the American flag, the symbol of liberty and justice for all, chanting “death to America” ,  and bearing signs reading “Islam will dominate the world” and “freedom go to Hell” along with “behead those who Insult Islam”  are innocent acts of no import or impact whatsoever, though they are carried out by thousands where as Terry Jones has fifty in his congregation.  Proportionality, anyone?  Can you perceive moral inversion??

  • ‘What would Jesus do”

He lectures us  by Jesus?  Unholy sacrilege!!! The Islamic version of Jesus is Allah’s slave, not God’s son, was not crucified, neither was he killed nor resurrected.  And he will return to lead the Muslims in  battle against us, the final and ultimate genocide.  He will rule the world by the Qur’an.   The arrogance of Muslims knows no bounds.  If you have any doubt about the veracity of this paragraph, read this blog post: The Defamation of Jesus Christ.

September 10, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Islamic Radicalism?, Political Correctness | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Qur’an: Read it before Burning it


General Petraeus is quoted by the Associated Press (on Yahoo! news) as saying that Qur’an burning would inflame passions.

“Images of the burning of a Quran would undoubtedly be used by extremists in Afghanistan — and around the world — to inflame public opinion and incite violence,”
The Secretary General of Nato is quoted in a similar vein.

“would be in a strong contradiction with the all the values we stand for and fight for.”
Did Christians riot, destroy property and kill people when a photograph was published as “art” showing a crucifix immersed in urine?  Did they riot when elephant dung was used in ersatz  iconography?  But Muslims, whipped to a frenzy by rabid clerics in Juma Salat  riot on the basis of unfounded rumors as well as such egregious offenses as the Motoons & Fitna.

If rabid Muslims are going to harm our troops because a few Qur’ans are burned,  they will also use  blog posts, books, videos and articles exposing the intrinsic evil of Islam as a pretexts for outrageous acts of violence.  If we follow the General’s illogic, we must forbid all criticism of Islam, effectively annulling the First Amendment.

CNN quotes General Petraeus as saying that the Qur’an burning could “endanger” our troops and the mission.  CNN quotes a statement from our Embassy in Kabul in which the Embassy condemns the Qur’an burning. in terms such as “acts of disrespect against the religion of Islam”, “deliberate attempts to offend members of religious or ethnic groups”  and “offensive messages, which are contrary to U.S. government policy “.

Msnbc reports on the remarks of Attorney General Eric Holder and other critics.  They quote Holder as calling the burning “idiotic and dangerous” . They quote a group of religious leaders as referring to “anti-Muslim frenzy”  and  “disrespect for a sacred text”.

“To attack any religion in the United States is to do violence to the religious freedom of all Americans,”
State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley is quoted  in a fulminating denunciation

“We think that these are provocative acts, they are disrespectful, they are intolerant, they are divisive,”
Crowley called the burning “inconsistent with our American values” and “un-American”.

Our servicemen are in harm’s way in Afghanistan, viewed by the locals as “occupiers” to be tormented, killed and driven away. When  Dar ul-Islam is invaded, jihad to repel the invaders is fard ayn, an individually binding religious obligation upon all able bodied male Muslims. I direct the attention of doubters and dissenters to Reliance of the Traveller, Book o9.1. They do not need any additional provocation.

Dove World calls Islam Satanic.  It intends to protest Islam’s attacks on us by burning Qur’ans. Is that  an attack on a religion?  Is Islam a religion?  Muslims do use that word, but the principal term used to describe Islam is Deen: way of life.  What is that way of life?  What is its economic base, is it agriculture? Is it construction? Is it manufacturing? Is it trade and commerce?  One saying  attributed to Muhammad answers these questions for us. Read it carefully; I added emphasis to  make critical points clear to you.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

Muhammad told the Muslims that if they engage in trade & agriculture to the exclusion of jihad Allah will curse them until they return to “your original religion”. What did they give up? What must they return to? Jihad.  What is jihad?  Is jihad an-nafs, the struggle against ego and temptation an alternative to agriculture? How  would it produce food or income with which to purchase food?   What is jihad, and how does it rival  agriculture as an economic activity?

Fortunately for us, Islamic law includes a clear and unambiguous definition of jihad. For clarity and ease of exploration, I have added emphasis and links to external references.

o9.0: Jihad

(O: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad.

“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad.”

The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:

-1- “Fighting is prescribed for you” (Koran 2:216);

-2- “Slay them wherever you find them” (Koran 4:89);

-3- “Fight the idolators utterly” (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

“I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah”;

and the hadith reported by Muslim,

“To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it.”Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.)
Jihad means “to war on non-Muslims”.  How does it produce income?  The Qur’an has the answer to this question, distributed over several surahs. [Emphasis added for clarity.]

8:1. They ask you (O Muhammad) about the spoils of war. Say: “The spoils are for Allâh and the Messenger.” So fear Allâh and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad), if you are believers.

8:41. And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allâh, and to the Messenger, and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad)], (and also) the orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have believed in Allâh and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the two forces met (the battle of Badr) – And Allâh is Able to do all things.
Al-Anfal is variously translated as “The Spoils”, “War Booty” or “The Windfalls”. If Islam is a “religion of peace”, why does its scripture tell us that Moe gets the loot, specifically the top 20%. That top 20% is called Khums.  In Bukhari’s collection of authentic hadith, the Book of Khumus describes the division of the spoils.    Of course, that must be a rare and occasional  necessity, because Islam is a “religion of peace”.  So why does that book contain 88 ahadith?

In Surah Al Fath, we learn that Allah has promised the Muslims “rich spoils” that they will capture.

48:19. And abundant spoils that they will capture. And Allâh is Ever All-Mighty, All-Wise.

48:20. Allâh has promised you abundant spoils that you will capture, and He has hastened for you this, and He has restrained the hands of men from you, that it may be a sign for the believers, and that He may guide you to a Straight Path.

48:21. And other (victories and much booty there are, He promises you) which are not yet within your power, indeed Allâh compasses them, And Allâh is Ever Able to do all things.
Did Allah deliver on his promise of “abundant spoils”?

33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.

33:27. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.
In another ayeh, Allah reveals Moe’s motivation: “the good of this world”.  What does that mean?

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
The translators included a parenthetical expression taken from tafsir. That expression tells us what Moe wanted: ransom money.  The mission of Islam is mercenary, neither beneficent, spiritual nor anodyne.  “Religion of peace”?  Waging war, making a great slaughter is one of the duties of a Prophet.  Got a clue yet?

The hadit have more clues for the clueless.

Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4327:
The spoils of war were not made lawful for any people before us, This is because Allah saw our weakness and humility and made them lawful for us.
Taking spoils was taboo among the Arabs. Allah gave Moe special dispensation because he saw Moe’s weakness and humility.  Lets take a good, close look at that humility. Khan bowdlerized this hadith when he translated Bukhari. Aisha Bewley did not.

Bukhari  Ch 61 # 2756: …It is mentioned from Ibn ‘Umar from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, “My provision has been placed under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and humility have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.
How did Moe get his provision? What happened to anyone who disobeyed his command?  So Allah saw his weakness and humility….. Humility?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
Narrated Abu Huraira:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).
How was Moe made victorious?  Who brought him the keys to the treasures of the world?  What of those treasures?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 267:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Prophet said, “Khosrau will be ruined, and there will be no Khosrau after him, and Caesar will surely be ruined and there will be no Caesar after him, and you will spend their treasures in Allah’s Cause.” He called, “War is deceit’.
How about those treasures, did they inure to Moe’s benefit?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 37, Number 495:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

Whenever a dead man in debt was brought to Allah’s Apostle he would ask, “Has he left anything to repay his debt?” If he was informed that he had left something to repay his debts, he would offer his funeral prayer, otherwise he would tell the Muslims to offer their friend’s funeral prayer. When Allah made the Prophet wealthy through conquests, he said, “I am more rightful than other believers to be the guardian of the believers, so if a Muslim dies while in debt, I am responsible for the repayment of his debt, and whoever leaves wealth (after his death) it will belong to his heirs. ”

How did Allah make Moe wealthy?

I have presented proof of the centrality of Jihad in Islam, that it is a predatory way of life, predation upon the non-Islamic human race, Dar ul-Harb, the land of war.  Why is it the land of war?  Because it is not yet under Islam’s domination.

The entire world must be brought under Islamic domination because Allah’s word must be made superior.

9:33. It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh) hate (it).

48:28. He it is Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), that He may make it (Islâm) superior over all religions. And All-Sufficient is Allâh as a Witness.

61:9. He it is Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâmic Monotheism) to make it victorious over all (other) religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, and disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh and in His Messenger Muhammed ) hate (it).
Two ayat declare that Islam must be made superior, one declares that it must be made victorious.  How would that happen?  The  context has a clue for you.

61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn ­ Eternity [‘Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.
“Strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh”; whatever could that mean?  How would that make Islam victorious & dominant?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 65:

Narrated Abu Musa: A man came to the Prophet and asked, “A man fights for war booty; another fights for fame and a third fights for showing off; which of them fights in Allah’s Cause?” The Prophet said, “He who fights that Allah’s Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights in Allah’s Cause.”

13:41. See they not that We gradually reduce the land (of disbelievers, by giving it to the believers, in war victories) from its outlying borders. And Allâh judges, there is none to put back His Judgement and He is Swift at reckoning.

Muslims fight in Allah’s cause, to make Islam dominant. Allah gives them the  disbeliever’s land in war victories.  Got a clue yet?

Two ayat in Surah Al-Anfal tell us most of what we need to know about Islam.

8:38. Say to those who have disbelieved, if they cease (from disbelief) their past will be forgiven. But if they return (thereto), then the examples of those (punished) before them have already preceded (as a warning).

8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
Who: disbelievers.  What? Fight them until resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped in the whole world.  Got a clue yet?  Surah At-Taubah has another clue for  the clueless.

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

But Islam is a “great religion of peace”.   Surely those conquest imperatives must be  metaphorical, allegorical or anachronistic. Yeah, right. I already showed you one of the confirming ahadith, in that quote from Reliance. “commanded to fight the people until”… . That same section told you that jihad is warfare against disbelievers.  But you did not get a clue.  Shari’ah has another clue for you.  Those conquest imperatives are codified into Islamic law and one of them specifies its scriptural basis.

o9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

“Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29),

the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be peace).  After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad. As for the Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

“I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,”

this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).
The caliph makes war on  “people of the scripture”  until they are subjugated and  make annual extortion payments.  The scriptural basis is At-Taubah 29.
Allah said “fight them” ; Moe said ” I am commanded to fight” .  What did Moe do?  What did his rightly guided caliphs do?  How did Islam build an empire that stretched from the border of China to the border of France?

When America won its war of revolution, it no longer had the protection of the British fleet. Her shipping was sacked by the Barbary Pirates. The young nation was nearly bankrupted by paying tribute.  Adams & Jefferson asked by what right they attacked us.  The answer has another clue for you.

The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven. [Wikepedia]
Examine the crucial elements.

  • Laws of the Prophet
  • written in their Koran
  • who should not have answered their authority were sinners,
  • right and duty to make war upon them
  • make slaves of all they could take as prisoners
  • every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven

Can you connect the dots?  If not, you are a certified LibTard, like Holder, Clinton & Obama.  The ambassador’s obnoxious statement is strikingly similar to a statement made  to a Persian general on a battlefield. This quote comes from Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”
Examine the crucial elements.

  • ordered us to fight you
    • until you worship Allah alone
      • or give jizya
  • martyrs go to Paradise
  • survivors enslave you

Are you intelligent enough to connect the dots or are you a LibTard, impervious to all evidence?  Why do Muslims attack us; are they grievance driven or doctrine driven?  Is Islam a “religion of peace” ? Has it been “perverted”,  “twisted” or “hijacked”?

Is the Qur’an a holy book, the sacred word of Allah or was it contrived by a venal con man, woven of plagiarized pseudepigrapha  and situational scripture?   You won’t find the answer from the Qur’an alone, you need  hadith to complete the puzzle. Moe, like modern cult leaders, had groupies. Moe wanted to accept their sexual advances. Allah accommodated his wishes.

33:50. O Prophet (Muhammad )! Verily, We have made lawful to you your wives, to whom you have paid their Mahr (bridal money given by the husband to his wife at the time of marriage), and those (captives or slaves) whom your right hand possesses – whom Allâh has given to you, and the daughters of your ‘Amm (paternal uncles) and the daughters of your ‘Ammah (paternal aunts) and the daughters of your Khâl (maternal uncles) and the daughters of your Khâlah (maternal aunts) who migrated (from Makkah) with you, and a believing woman if she offers herself to the Prophet, and the Prophet wishes to marry her; a privilege for you only, not for the (rest of) the believers. Indeed We know what We have enjoined upon them about their wives and those (captives or slaves) whom their right hands possess, – in order that there should be no difficulty on you. And Allâh is Ever Oft­Forgiving, Most Merciful.
Moe lusted after Zainab, whose father rejected him.  Moe fixed up his adopted son with her, later taking advantage of a convenient divorce to snatch her.

33:37. And (remember) when you said to him (Zaid bin Hârithah; the freed­slave of the Prophet ) on whom Allâh has bestowed Grace (by guiding him to Islâm) and you (O Muhammad  too) have done favour (by manumitting him) “Keep your wife to yourself, and fear Allâh.” But you did hide in yourself (i.e. what Allâh has already made known to you that He will give her to you in marriage) that which Allâh will make manifest, you did fear the people (i.e., Muhammad  married the divorced wife of his manumitted slave) whereas Allâh had a better right that you should fear Him. So when Zaid had accomplished his desire from her (i.e. divorced her), We gave her to you in marriage, so that (in future) there may be no difficulty to the believers in respect of (the marriage of) the wives of their adopted sons when the latter have no desire to keep them (i.e. they have divorced them). And Allâh’s Command must be fulfilled.

33:38. There is no blame on the Prophet () in that which Allâh has made legal for him.That has been Allâh’s Way with those who have passed away of (the Prophets of) old. And the Command of Allâh is a decree determined.

Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3330:

Anas (Allah be pleased with him) reported: When the ‘Iddah of Zainab was over, Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said to Zaid to make a mention to her about him. Zaid went on until he came to her and she was fermenting her flour. He (Zaid) said: As I saw her I felt in my heart an idea of her greatness so much so that I could not see towards her (simply for the fact) that Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) had made a mention of her. So I turned my back towards her. and I turned upon my heels, and said: Zainab, Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) has sent (me) with a message to you. She said: I do not do anything until I solicit the will of my Lord. So she stood at her place of worship and the (verse of) the Qur’an (pertaining to her marriage) were revealed, and Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) came to her without permission. He (the narrator) said: I saw that Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) served us bread and meat until it was broad day light and the people went away, but some persons who were busy in con- versation stayed on in the house after the meal. Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) also went out and I also followed him, and he began to visit the apartments of his wives greeting them (with the words): As-Salamu ‘alaikum, and they would say: Allah’s Messenger, how did you find your family (hadrat Zainab)? He (the narrator) stated: I do not know whether I had informed him that the people had gone out or he (the Holy Prophet) informed me (about that). He moved on until he entered the apartment, and I also went and wanted to enter (the apartment) along with him, but he threw a curtain between me and him, as (the verfes pertaining to seclusion) had been revealed, and people were instructed in what they had been instructed. Ibn Rafii had made this addition in his narration:” O you who believe, enter not the houses of the Prophet unless permission is given to you for a meal, not waiting for its cooking being finished…” to the words”… Allah forbears not from the truth.”

Moe’s favorite, his child bride was onto him. This hadith lets the cat out of the bag

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 311:

Narrated Aisha:

I used to look down upon those ladies who had given themselves to Allah’s Apostle and I used to say, “Can a lady give herself (to a man)?” But when Allah revealed: “You (O Muhammad) can postpone (the turn of) whom you will of them (your wives), and you may receive any of them whom you will; and there is no blame on you if you invite one whose turn you have set aside (temporarily).’ (33.51) I said (to the Prophet), “I feel that your Lord hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires.”

Now we know: the Qur’an ain’t sacred, it is situational scripture, a fraud.  Allah is no god, it is Moe’s dummy.

If burning the Qur’an is an attack on Islam, it is a counter attack, subsequent to Islamic attacks upon us.  Did you know that Islam denies the divinity, crucifixion, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ?  Did you know that Islam curses Jews & Christians, that it calls us the worst of living creatures?  Did you know that Allah turned some Jews into apes and swine?  Why not?  Because you have not read  the Qur’an.

I admit that the International Burn a Quran Day may irritate Muslims. But it serves a larger purpose: it gives me and others a good excuse to  expose the fatal facts of Islam to a curious public.  The constant drumbeat of news coverage is raising interest and curiosity.  A few more people will read this blog post. A few more will click the links and explore Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition and jurisprudence than otherwise would.  And I view that as a good thing.

So read the Qur’an  already. Then piss on it, let it dry and  burn it.

September 8, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Radicalism?, Political Correctness | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Radical Islam?!


American Congress For Truth sent out an email quoting a Dallas News Article:

Rod Dreher: What the Muslim Brotherhood means for the U.S.

The article quotes an exhibit in the Holy Land Foundation trial. You can read that exhibit and more at NEFA. The Investigative Project on Terrorism published explicit quotes from the Explanatory Memorandum. I reproduce one here with the addition of links to my explanation of the meanings of several critical expressions. Those explanations will include critical references to Islamic scripture.

The process of settlement is a “Civilization-Jihadist Proecess” with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslim’s destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny except for those who chose to slack. But, would the slackers and the Mujahedeen be equal.

Here is the court exhibit, in pdf format. The English translation follows the scanned Arabic document. An Explanatory Memorandum On the General Strategic Goal for the Group In North America 5/22/1991


EQUINE EXCREMENT:

RADICAL ISLAM

Radical implies something beyond the norm; something extreme. What is the norm in Islam? What standard did Muhammad establish by his preaching & practice? What is permitted; mandated?

  • Aggressive wars of conquest?
  • Genocide?
  • Infliction of terror?

What if:

  • Allah commanded
  • Muhammad preached
  • Muhammad exemplified

such practices? Are they not then standard, neither radical nor extreme?

JIHAD

2:190 And fight in the Way of Allâh those who fight you, but transgress not the limits. Truly, Allâh likes not the transgressors. 2:191 And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah is worse than killing. And fight not with them at Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (the sanctuary at Makkah), unless they (first) fight you there. But if they attack you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers. 2:193 And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allâh) and (all and every kind of) worship is for Allâh (Alone). But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zâlimûn (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.) 2:195 And spend in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd of all kinds, etc.) and do not throw yourselves into destruction (by not spending your wealth in the Cause of Allâh), and do good. Truly, Allâh loves Al-Muhsinûn (the good-doers). 2:216 Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allâh knows but you do not know. 8:39 And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do. 9:29 Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Thus spake Allah. Allah said “fight them”. Is that what he meant? Are the words clear? Are the sentences imperative? Once again: Is aggressive Jihad standard or radical? How did Muhammad interpret them?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387: Narrated Anas bin Malik: Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

What did Muhammad do?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 512: Narrated Anas: The Prophet offered the Fajr Prayer near Khaibar when it was still dark and then said, “Allahu-Akbar! Khaibar is destroyed, for whenever we approach a (hostile) nation (to fight), then evil will be the morning for those who have been warned.” Then the inhabitants of Khaibar came out running on the roads. The Prophet had their warriors killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives. Safiya was amongst the captives, She first came in the share of Dahya Alkali but later on she belonged to the Prophet . The Prophet made her manumission as her ‘Mahr’.

“Whenever we approach a nation” !!! It was a regular habit, not an exceptional practice. Jihad is part of the Islamic Deen. Its their way of life. Follow the link to that ahadith. Trace it back to the Sunnah page and read the entirety of Books 52 & 53. See what Muhammad did as a regular practice.

GENOCIDE

8:67 It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

How was Muhammad to earn admission to Paradise? What did he do about it?

Abu Dawud Book 38, Number 4390: Narrated Atiyyah al-Qurazi: I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those who had not grown hair.

Let that sink in for a moment. Muhammad took about 800 captive men of the Banu Qurayzah, dug a trench in Medina, cut off their heads and threw them into the trench. Then he did the same to their adolescent sons. Did it sink in yet?

TERROR

3:151 We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers). 8:12 (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.

Allah said: “We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve“, “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved“. What did he do about it?

33:26-27 And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.

What did Muhammad say about it?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331: Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah: The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given to any one else before me. 1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey. 2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due. 3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me. 4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of Resurrection). 5. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind. Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220: Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

Resulting Islamic Law

Read this treatise on Maliki Fiqh. The following is quoted from SANE.

Ibn Abi Zayd al-Qayrawani (10th century), a Maliki jurist, declared:

Jihad is a precept of Divine institution. Its performance by certain individuals may dispense others from it. We Malikis maintain that it is preferable not to begin hostilities with the enemy before having invited the latter to embrace the religion of Allah except where the enemy attacks first. They have the alternative of either converting to Islam or paying the poll tax (jizya), short of which war will be declared against them.

Ibn Taymiyya (14th century), a Hanbali jurist, and a favorite of contemporary jihadists:

Since lawful warfare is essentially jihad and since its aim is that the religion is God’s entirely and God’s word is uppermost, therefore according to all Muslims, those who stand in the way of this aim must be fought. As for those who cannot offer resistance or cannot fight, such as women, children, monks, old people, the blind, handicapped and their likes, they shall not be killed unless they actually fight with words (e.g. by propaganda) and acts (e.g. by spying or otherwise assisting in the warfare).

The Hanafi school, as set forth in an the authoritative work, Hidaya, authored by Burhan-ud-din Ali ben Abu Bakr al-Marghilani (12th century), a work which is considered widely authoritative as a guide to Islamic jurisprudence in Central Asia, Afghanistan, and India, rules:

It is not lawful to make war upon any people who have never before been called to the faith, without previously requiring them to embrace it, because the Prophet so instructed his commanders, directing them to call the infidels to the faith, and also because the people will hence perceive that they are attacked for the sake of religion, and not for the sake of taking their property, or making slaves of their children, and on this consideration it is possible that they may be induced to agree to the call, in order to save themselves from the troubles of war.

If a Muslim attack infidels without previously calling them to the faith, he is an offender, because this is forbidden; but yet if he do attack them before thus inviting them and slay them, and take their property, neither fine, expiation, nor atonement are due, because that which protects (namely, Islam) does not exist in them, nor are they under protection by place (namely the Daru ‘l-Islam, or Muslim territory), and the mere prohibition of the act is not sufficient to sanction the exaction either of fine or of atonement for property; in the same manner as the slaying of the women or infant children of infidels is forbidden, but if, notwithstanding, a person were to slay such, he is not liable to a fine. It is laudable to call to the faith a people to whom a call has already come, in order that they may have the more full and ample warning; but yet this is not incumbent, as it appears in the Traditions that the Prophet plundered and despoiled the tribe of al-Mustaliq by surprise, and he also agreed with Asamah to make a predatory attack upon Qubna at an early hour, and to set it on fire, and such attacks are not preceded by a call. (Qubna is a place in

Syria: some assert it is the name of a tribe).

If the infidels, upon receiving the call, neither consent to it nor agree to pay capitation tax, it is then incumbent on the Muslims to call upon God for assistance, and to make war upon them, because God is the assistant of those who serve Him, and the destroyer of His enemies, the infidels, and it is necessary to implore His aid upon every occasion; the Prophet, moreover, commands us so to do. And having so done, the Muslims must then with God’s assistance attack the infidels with all manner of warlike engines (as the Prophet did by the people of Ta’if), and must also set fire to their habitations (in the same manner as the Prophet fired Baweera), and must inundate them with water and tear up their plantations and tread down their grain because by these means they will become weakened, and their resolution will fail and their force be broken; these means are, therefore, all sanctified by the law.

The Shafi’i scholar Abu’l Hasan al-Mawardi (11th century), holds:

The mushrikun [infidels] of Dar al-Harb (the arena of battle) are of two types: First, those whom the call of Islam has reached, but they have refused it and have taken up arms. The amir of the army has the option of fighting them…in accordance with what he judges to be in the best interest of the Muslims and most harmful to the mushrikun… Second, those whom the invitation to Islam has not reached, although such persons are few nowadays since Allah has made manifest the call of his Messenger…it is forbidden to…begin an attack before explaining the invitation to Islam to them, informing them of the miracles of the Prophet and making plain the proofs so as to encourage acceptance on their part; if they still refuse to accept after this, war is waged against them and they are treated as those whom the call has reached…

Robert Spencer’s www.jihadwatch.com continues:

Underscoring the fact that none of this is merely of historical interest is another Shafi’i manual of Islamic law that in 1991 was certified by the highest authority in Sunni Islam, Cairo’s Al-Azhar University, as conforming “to the practice and faith of the orthodox Sunni community.” This manual, ‘Umdat al-Salik (available in English as Reliance of the Traveller), after defining the “greater jihad” as “spiritual warfare against the lower self,” devotes eleven pages to the “lesser jihad.” It defines this jihad as “war against non-Muslims,” noting that the word itself “is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion.”

It spells out the nature of this warfare in quite specific terms: “the caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians . . . until they become Muslim or pay the non-Muslim poll tax.” It adds a comment by a Jordanian jurist that corresponds to Muhammad’s instructions to call the unbelievers to Islam before fighting them: the caliph wages this war only “provided that he has first invited [Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians] to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya) . . . while remaining in their ancestral religions.” Also, if there is no caliph, Muslims must still wage jihad.

Ibn Khaldun (1332-1406), a pioneering historian and philosopher, was also a Maliki legal theorist. In his renowned Muqaddimah, the first work of historical theory, he notes that “in the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force.” In Islam, the person in charge of religious affairs is concerned with “power politics,” because Islam is “under obligation to gain power over other nations.”

Extremists? Propaganda? No, this is the Islamic mainstream.

Examine the standard handbook of Sharia: Reliance of the Traveler.

O-9.8: The Objectives of Jihad The caliph (o-25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o-11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax… O-9.9 The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n: though according to the Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers, are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sole exceptions to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs, neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh Bidaya al-mubtadi’ (y-21), 6.48-49) ).

The Caliph makes war & fights in the regular course of affairs; nothing special. That’s standard, neither radical nor extreme. How often does he do it?

Al-Shafi’i (God have mercy on him) said: “The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims’ interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse.” He said: “If he did not undertake the sending of enough troops to fight, those who are absent (must) go out, and consider as an obligation that which God (who is praised) said.”

What if he doesn’t?

Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar: I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

What man, having a soul, possessing even a scintilla of vestigial morality, can know this without cursing Islam? How then, can any politician, any elected official; any aspirant for high office use adjectives or qualifiers when discussing Islam? “Radical Islam”, “Extreme Islam” & “Fundamentalist Islam” all imply that Islam is peaceful, that it does not engage in aggressive wars of conquest, genocide nor terrorism. Nothing could be further from the truth. I have established, by quoting Allah & his Messenger, the traditions of his companions, and Sharia, the fatal fact that Islam sanctifies & mandates Jihad, genocide & terror. Hereafter, when you hear a politician use these terms: “Radical Islam”, “Extreme Islam” & “Fundamentalist Islam”, you will know that he is either ignorant or a liar. Attempt to educate him; send him a copy of this essay.


Al-Ikhwan is the Muslim Brotherhood, originally a wild & militant band of Wahhabis who formed the nucleus of Ibn Saud’s army in his take over of the Hijaz. Here is a machine translation of one article on their web site. Click it and see their historical emphasis on conquest. HAMAS is the Fallestinian branch of Al Ikhwan. Their Charter is informative.

The Islamic Resistance Movement draws its guidelines from Islam; derives from it its thinking, interpretations and views about existence, life and humanity; refers back to it for its conduct; and is inspired by it in whatever step it takes.

Article 1 informs us that Islam is the source, not Al-Ikhwan. Article 8, their slogan, lets the cat out of the bag.

Allah is its goal, the Prophet its model, the Qur’an its Constitution, Jihad its path and death for the case of Allah its most sublime belief.

Article 11 tells us how Islam acquired land:

This is the status [of the land] in Islamic Shari’a, and it is similar to all lands conquered by Islam by force, and made thereby Waqf lands upon their conquest, for all generations of Muslims until the Day of Resurrection.

Jihad means struggle or striving. Lets examine the explanation provided by Hilali & Khan, who translated the Qur’an published by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This is the footnote to 2:190.

(V.2:190) Al-Jihâd (holy fighting) in Allâh’s Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry) is given the utmost importance in Islâm and is one of its pillar (on which it stands). By Jihâd Islâm is established, Allâh’s Word is made superior, (His Word being Lâ ilaha illallâh which means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion (Islâm) is propagated. By abandoning Jihâd (may Allâh protect us from that) Islâm is destroyed and the Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honour is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihâd is an obligatory duty in Islâm on every Muslim, and he who tries to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to fulfil this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.

Muslims and their apologists love to tell us that 2:190 is the lesser Jihad; that Jihad an- Nafs is the greater Jihad. Great! How do you get killed fighting against your ego & temptation?

4:74 Let those (believers) who sell the life of this world for the Hereafter fight in the Cause of Allâh, and whoso fights in the Cause of Allâh, and is killed or gets victory, We shall bestow on him a great reward.

Destruction by their hands is a reference to 59:2.

He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Bani An-Nadir) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allah! But Allah’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).

What did Allah do? He terrorized the Bani An-Nadir. Result: destruction of their village. Legacy: casting terror into our hearts. Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions has several references to the Qur’an & Hadith.

8:39 And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

9:33 It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh) hate (it).

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 355: Narrated Abu Musa Al-Ashari: A bedouin asked the Prophet, “A man may fight for the sake of booty, and another may fight so that he may be mentioned by the people, and a third may fight to show his position (i.e. bravery); which of these regarded as fighting in Allah’s Cause?” The Prophet said, “He who fights so that Allah’s Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights for Allah’s Cause.”

It is a Muslim’s destiny to perform Jihad is a reference to another ayat.

9:111 Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .

What do believers do? Why? Is that radical or is that standard Islamic practice? But, would the slackers and the Mujahedeen be equal ?

4:95 Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with their wealth and their lives. Allâh has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home). Unto each, Allâh has promised good (Paradise), but Allâh has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward;

September 14, 2007 Posted by | Islam, Islamic Radicalism?, Islamic Terrorism, Jihad, Qur'an, Radical Islam, Religion of Peace, Terrorists | Leave a comment

Bush Lies About Islam!!!


Remarks by the President to the APEC Business Summit

As Prepared for Delivery

September 06, 2007 06:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time

…Second, nations in the Asia Pacific are providing economic assistance to struggling communities where the terrorists operate so we can strengthen moderate leaders and give citizens in these communities alternatives to the path of radicalism and violence1…. Fourth, nations in the Asia Pacific are working to defeat the terrorists hateful ideology2. Prime Minister Lee of Singapore says the fight against terrorism is a long-term ideological struggle. He is right. We must bring the terrorists to justice3, and to prevail in this struggle, we must also defeat them in the battle of ideas4. Our enemies are followers of a violent and narrow ideology5, a political vision that despises freedom, rejects tolerance, and crushes all dissent. Their goal is to impose this ideology on millions across the world6. For there to be peace, we must promote an alternative vision of human dignity and human liberty a hopeful vision far stronger than the dark appeal of resentment and murder7. And that is precisely what leaders across the Asia Pacific region are doing.

In Indonesia, President Yudhoyono hosted an interfaith dialogue soon after taking office where he called on his fellow citizens to ensure that the forces of light, reason, and hope overpower the forces of darkness, despair, and violence. The head of the largest Muslim organization in Indonesia, Dr. Hasyim Muzadi, was one of the first Muslim leaders to visit Ground Zero in New York. He puts it this way: There is no violence, cruelty, chaos, and viciousness on behalf of religion, including Islam.8

In Malaysia, Prime Minister Badawi is working to promote what he calls Islam Hadhari or Civilizational Islam9 and he has called on his fellow Malaysians to show by example that a Muslim country can be modern, democratic10, tolerant, and economically competitive.

In the Philippines, President Arroyo has reached out to Muslim leaders and has called Filipinos to oppose terrorists who kill, bomb, and maim to enforce an ideology of evil. And a group of leading Filipino Islamic jurists issued a joint sermon declaring Islam and terrorism stand on the opposite ends of the moral spectrum. Murder and the killing of innocent civilians in warfare is strictly forbidden.11


  1. Economic development is not a substitute for Jihad. Jihad is doctrine driven. Usama bin Laden was a wealthy man. His wealth did not dissuade him from participating in Jihad. Many of the homicide bombers were law & medicine students with bright futures.
  2. What is that hateful ideology? Why not name it: Islam. Why not disclose the doctrines which drive it?
  3. Who are the terrorists? How many are there? How do you hope to locate, identify & prosecute every Muslim who supports, sympathizes with, finances or facilitates terrorism?
  4. What ideas? Why not identify the doctrines which drive Jihad? What are you doing; what do you propose to do to counter those ideas?
  5. What ideology? Why won’t you name it? Why won’t you list its idea set?
  6. Their goal is to impose Islam upon the entire world: total domination on a global scale. Why won’t you acknowledge this fact?
  7. “Dark appeal of resentment and murder”? No, Mr. President; the glorious promise of eternity in a garden flowing with rivers of milk and wine with low hanging fruit always in season; in the company of perpetual virgins & little boys, fresh as pearls. That glorious promise is contrasted with the terrible threat of eternity in Hell fire; eating bitter burning thorns and drinking boiling water. A Muslim earns Paradise by participating in Jihad and is condemned to Hell for shirking. Do you not understand that Muslims have sold their lives & property to Allah in return for Paradise, for which they kill and are killed? They have written off earthly prosperity and pleasure for the eternal.
  8. The worst Goddamn lies ever told!!! Totally malignant & malicious; without redemption! See the doctrines of Islam exposed below, which sanctify conquest, genocide & terrorism..
  9. Pure fraud; there is no such thing! Islam is only what Allah revealed in the Qur’an and Muhammad exemplified in his Sira & Sunnah. Anything else is not Islam.
  10. Impossible! Only Allah has the right to rule. Once Allah and his Messenger have decreed a matter, no dissent is permitted. Islamic law is the Qur’an & Sunnah; manmade legislation is blasphemous.
  11. Malicious Malarkey!!! Kuffar are regarded as rebels against Allah. Their lives and property are not sacred to Muslims. Kuffar are listed as Najis things, along with cadavers and excrement. Killing them is expressly commanded in 8:67 and 47:4. Below you will find an ahadith in which a captive describes the examination and slaughter of boys who had reached puberty. Killing children is proscribed on economic, not moral grounds. Dead children could not be sold into slavery.

Since President Bush will not expose the set of ideas which drive Islam, I will.

  • Exclusivity–only Allah has the right to be worshiped. Examine 3:2 as translated by Hilali & Khan.Allâh! Lâ ilahâ illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He), the Ever Living, the One Who sustains and protects all that exists. Note that they include the transliterated Arabic. See also three alternative translations at USC.
  • Supremacism–Islam must be dominant. 9:33. It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh) hate (it). Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 355:Narrated Abu Musa Al-Ashari:A bedouin asked the Prophet, “A man may fight for the sake of booty, and another may fight so that he may be mentioned by the people, and a third may fight to show his position (i.e. bravery); which of these regarded as fighting in Allah’s Cause?” The Prophet said, “He who fights so that Allah’s Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights for Allah’s Cause.” Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:
    Narrated Abu Huraira:
    The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.” means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.
  • Triumphalism: 3:111 They will do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if they fight against you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped. 3:125Yes, if you hold on to patience and piety, and the enemy comes rushing at you; your Lord will help you with five thousand angels having marks (of distinction).” 3:127 That He might cut off a part of those who disbelieve, or expose them to infamy, so that they retire frustrated. 3:160 If Allâh helps you, none can overcome you; and if He forsakes you, who is there after Him that can help you? And in Allâh (Alone) let believers put their trust. 13:41 See they not that We gradually reduce the land (of disbelievers, by giving it to the believers, in war victories) from its outlying borders. And Allâh judges, there is none to put back His Judgement and He is Swift at reckoning.

What are the damnable doctrines of Islam that make it an existential threat? President Bush won’t expose them, I will.

  • Jihad: fighting in Allah’s cause. This is not Jihad an-Nafs– against the self/temptation. Who is liable to be killed struggleing against temptation? 3:145, 3:154, 3:156,. 3:157 And if you are killed or die in the Way of Allâh, forgiveness and mercy from Allâh are far better than all that they amass (of worldly wealths, etc.). Jihad is mandatory, not optional. 2:216 Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allâh knows but you do not know.
  • Jihad against Pagans: 8:39 And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
  • Jihad against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians: 9:29 Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
  • Terrorism: 3:151 We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers). 8:12 (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.33:26-27 And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.
  • Genocide: 8:67 It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise. 47:4 So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom), or ransom (according to what benefits Islâm), until the war lays down its burden. Thus [you are ordered by Allâh to continue in carrying out Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm (i.e. are saved from the punishment in the Hell-fire) or at least come under your protection], but if it had been Allâh’s Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allâh, He will never let their deeds be lost,

The Qur’an does not say that? Prove it! I provided links to the King Fahd Complex For Printing The Noble Qur’an. Click them, read them and prove me wrong.

The Qur’an does not mean that? Prove it! 3:7 says otherwise: It is He Who has sent down to you (Muhammad ) the Book (this Qur’ân). In it are Verses that are entirely clear, they are the foundations of the Book [and those are the Verses of Al-Ahkâm (commandments, etc.), Al-Farâ’id (obligatory duties) and Al-Hudud (legal laws for the punishment of thieves, adulterers, etc.)]; and others not entirely clear. So as for those in whose hearts there is a deviation (from the truth) they follow that which is not entirely clear thereof, seeking Al-Fitnah (polytheism and trials, etc.), and seeking for its hidden meanings, but none knows its hidden meanings save Allâh. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say: “We believe in it; the whole of it (clear and unclear Verses) are from our Lord.” And none receive admonition except men of understanding. (Tafsir At-Tabarî).

In evidence whereof, I submit Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir: The Mutashabihat and Muhkamat Ayat . Who knows more about the Qur’an, you or Ibn Kathir, who spent his whole life studying it?

8:39, 9:29, 8:12 & 8:67 don’t say what they mean? Lets see what Ibn Kathir has to say about that:

Then how did Muhammad apply those ayat?

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
    Narrated Anas bin Malik:
    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”
  • Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
    Narrated Abu Huraira:Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).
  • Abu Dawud Book 38, Number 4390:
    Narrated Atiyyah al-Qurazi:
    I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those who had not grown hair.
  • Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 512:
    Narrated Anas:
    The Prophet offered the Fajr Prayer near Khaibar when it was still dark and then said, “Allahu-Akbar! Khaibar is destroyed, for whenever we approach a (hostile) nation (to fight), then evil will be the morning for those who have been warned.” Then the inhabitants of Khaibar came out running on the roads. The Prophet had their warriors killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives. Safiya was amongst the captives, She first came in the share of Dahya Alkali but later on she belonged to the Prophet . The Prophet made her manumission as her ‘Mahr’.

What does Islamic law say about Jihad?

  • The Reliance of the Traveller. Version 1.06 – By Ahmad Ibn Naqib Al-Misri
    BOOK O: JUSTICE >> Chapter O-9.0: Jihad


    O-9.8: The Objectives of Jihad
    The caliph (o-25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o-11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax
  • O-9.9
    The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n: though according to the Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers, are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sole exceptions to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs, neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh Bidaya al-mubtadi’ (y-21), 6.48-49) ).

The Caliph does what?! He makes war; he fights!!! In the normal course of business!!! That is Islamic law. Need a second opinion? How about two?

What must the Imam do? How often?

September 7, 2007 Posted by | Ahadith, ayat, Bush, Bush Lies, GWOT, Islam, Islamic Radicalism?, Islamic Terrorism, Jihad, Qur'an, Terrorists | Leave a comment

Good Muslims Know


An email from a Gold Star Mother. I have added a hyperlink to Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir so that you can verify the quoted text.

Ben, real quick here: the reason why I state what good Muslims know, and that is, the Sira is an indispensable part of Islam, because it is a major part of what comprises the sunnah, is also seen throughout ibn Kathir’s tafsir.

Consider the value and respect rendered to ibn Kathir. Then, take note, how often he works off of the report of none other than “Muhammad, son of Ishaq son of Yasar.”

Ibn Ishaq was “born in Medina, about A.H 85. . . . His grandfather Yasar fell into the hands of Khalid b al-Walid.” He was amongst the prisoners Kalid sent to Abu Bakr in Medinah. There, his son, Ishaq, ibn Ishaq’s dad, was born about the year 50.

Hence, the respect for ibn Ishaq as a reliable transmitter. And Tabari works off of ibn Ishaq’s work.

The difference between knowing the prophet and his companions and knowing of them is in knowing of what is in the pages of the sira and digesting that or not knowing of them. Once you get into them, you will only state the same.

dl

Threatening the Jews With Defeat and Encouraging Them to Learn a Lesson From the Battle of Badr

Muhammad bin Ishaq bin Yasar recorded that `Asim bin `Umar bin Qatadah said that when the Messenger of Allah gained victory in the battle of Badr and went back to Al-Madinah, he gathered the Jews in the marketplace of Bani Qaynuqa`.

Therefore, Allah said,

﴿قَدْ كَانَ لَكُمْ ءَايَةٌ﴾

(There has already been a sign for you) meaning, O Jews, who said what you said! You have an Ayah, meaning proof, that Allah will make His religion prevail, award victory to His Messenger, make His Word apparent and His religion the highest.

﴿فِي فِئَتَيْنِ﴾


Allah will make his religion prevail, award victory & make Islam superior. That ayeh is 3:13 . It lays bare Islam’s supremacism & triumphalism. Go now, and read that Tafsir. See what Allah said to the Jews; see what Muhammad did to them!

September 6, 2007 Posted by | ayat, GWOT, Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Radicalism?, Islamic Terrorism, Jihad, Qur'an, Religion of Peace | Leave a comment

Questions for Fred Thompson


The following quote was found at politico.com.

  • A key adviser said the two biggest issues motivating Thompson are “Islamic radicalism and the threat of terrorism reaching our shores,” and a sense that “politics has broken down in the domestic arena, too.”

One phrase in that quote bothers me: Islamic radicalismAre you merely careless with the language or  ignorant of Islam? The term implies that Islamic terrorism is a deviation from the orthodox standard of Islam. Nothing could be further from the truth.  Here is the standard of Islam; what Allah & Muhammad said and did:

  1. 3:151 We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).[The Prohibition of Obeying the Disbelievers; the Cause of Defeat at Uhud]
  2. 8:12 (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.“[Allah commands the Angels to fight and support the Believers]
  3. 33:26-27 And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things. [Allah drove back the Confederates disappointed and lost] [The Campaign against Banu Qurayzah]
  4. Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:
    Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:
    The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given to any one else before me.
    1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.
    2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.
    3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.
    4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of Resurrection).
    5. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.
  5. Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:    Narrated Abu Huraira:    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” …

There you have Allah’s words, from the Hilali & Khan translation of the Qur’an. I have hyperlinked the Surah:Ayat numbers to the source for easy verification and access to the entire document.  Bracketed references are to Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir, which explains the meaning of the ayat.  Muhammad’s words come from Khan’s translation of Sahih Bukhari, the most accepted & trusted hadith collection.

Senator,

  1. Do you understand this: “We shall cast terror”…”I will cast terror”…”Allah cast terror”…”Allah made me victorious by awe”…I have been made victorious by terror” ?
  2. Then has Islam been hijacked, distorted or perverted as President Bush claims?
  3. Then is not terrorism an intrinsic sacrament of Islam?
  4. Then will you abjure the use of distracting & deceptive adjectives when discussing Islam?

Those are the minimum requirements for receiving my vote, both in the primary and the general election. Those who fail the fourth test will not get my vote.

September 6, 2007 Posted by | Ahadith, ayat, Fred, Fred Thompson, GWOT, Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Radicalism?, Islamic Terrorism, Qur'an, Radical Islam, Religion of Peace, Terrorists | Leave a comment

%d bloggers like this: