Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer tell it as it is!


Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer tell it as it is! A Facebook friend linked to a web page from New Zealand, which contained videos from a meeting in Colorado March 22, ’12.

In these videos, Pamela Geller & Robert Spencer tell it as it
is.  Because others shared these videos with me, I am sharing them
with you. I ask that you share them with others.

Robert Spencer cites the Qur’an, hadith &
Reliance of the Traveller in his remarks.  I want you to
understand that he is not blowing smoke, so I have included quotes and
links in this blog post.  The links include one to Amazon, where
you can purchase a hard copy of Reliance of the Traveller and on line
images of Reliance & Hedaya because I want you to verify for
yourself the veracity of Spencer’s statements.

Why does the threat of Jihad go unrecognized?  Primarily because
Islam is successfully disguised as a religion. We presume that
religions are anodyne & benign; Islam is predatory &
violent.  Secondarily because our leaders lack the SISU to
acknowledge the threat because if they did, popular demand for the
eradication of Islam would be considered genocidal; a new Holocaust.

Sahih Bukhari, considered to be the most authentic
of the six canonical hadith collections, is made available by the
Muslim Student Association at USC.  Turn to Volume 6, Book 60, Number
444
for
the story of the commencement of Moe’s prophetic career.

    Divine mandate

The divine mandate to enforce the wrath of Allah in this life by
punishing infidels is found in the Qur’an.  in Surah At-Taubah 2,
Allah tells the pagans of Mecca that they can not escape. The
translators insert an explanation in parenthesis.

9:2. So travel freely (O Mushrikûn – see V.2:105)
for four months (as you will) throughout the land, but know that you cannot
escape
(from
the Punishment of)
Allâh, and Allâh will disgrace the
disbelievers.

Allah then commands the Muslims to wage war against the pagans of Mecca
to punish and disgrace them.

9:14. Fight against
them so that Allâh
will punish them by your hands and disgrace them
and give you
victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people,

Spencer cites Surah At-Taubah 29 which commands
Muslims to wage war against “people of the Book”.

9:29. Fight against those who
(1) believe not in Allâh,

(2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden
by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the
religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the
Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until they pay the
Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued
.

Full comprehension of that verse requires reference
to its antecedent in Surah Al-Anfal, (The Spoils) which commands
perpetual warfare against pagans & atheists until only Allah is
worshiped on a global scale.   These are outcome oriented,
open ended loops conditioned on predetermined outcomes: cessation of
resistance, monopoly of faith & practice and extortion &
submission.

8:39. And fight them until
there is no more
Fitnah
(disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others
besides Allâh) and
the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone

[in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others
besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

These conquest imperatives are codified in Book O, Chapter 9.8&9 of Reliance of the Traveller,
which you can purchase from Amazon.
“The caliph makes war on Jews…”, “the caliph fights all other peoples
until they become Muslim”.  These are offensive, not defensive
wars. For the proof of this fact, click the link to Book O9.8 above and
scroll up to O9.1. The Muslims must attack passive kuffar who are at
home, minding their own affairs at least once in every year.  For
the remaining doubters, Hedaya, the codification according to the Hanifi
school, declares that “Destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels
though they be not
the first aggressors
“.

    humiliation & disgrace

Full comprehension of this issue requires reading
one hadith which was bowdlerized by Khan , the context of Surah
Al-Imran 110 and the hadith which explains it.

Bukhari
Ch 61 # 2756: …It is mentioned from Ibn ‘Umar from the Prophet, may
Allah bless him and grant him peace, “My provision has
been placed under
the shadow of my spear
, and abasement and humility
have been placed on the
one who disobeys my command
.

3:110. You [true
believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet
Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples
ever raised up for mankind
;
you enjoin Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has
ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that
Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of
the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better
for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are
Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against
Allâh’s Command
).

3:111. They will
do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if they fight against
you, they will show you their backs,
and they will not be
helped.

3:112. Indignity
is put over them wherever they may be
, except when under a
covenant (of protection) from Allâh, and from men; they have drawn on
themselves the Wrath of Allâh, and destruction is put over
them
.
This is because they disbelieved in the Ayât (proofs, evidences,
verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh and killed the
Prophets without right. This is because they disobeyed (Allâh) and used
to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh’s disobedience, crimes and sins).

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.” means, the best of peoples for
the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they
embrace Islam
.

In Hedaya, we learn that jizya is in liew of
‘destruction
.  We also learn that it is to be collected in a humiliating and degrading manner,
although Shafi’i disagrees.

 restrictions

Many of the restrictions on conquered Jews &
Christians are found in the Pact of Umar.  The prohibition on building
churches and public manifestation of religion, are codified in Reliance
O11.5.

Islam must be dominant. To comprehend this fact,
turn to Surah At-Taubah 33 & Sahih Bukhari 4.52.65. The political aspect of
Shari’ah is found in Reliance O.25 (the Caliphate). In O22.1, we discover that judges must be Muslims. In
O25.3
we learn that authority is for Muslims only.  That rule is not
limited to the caliphate, it drills down into the family.
Muslimas are prohibited from marrying kuffar because religion is passed
down patrilineally.  If a Muslim woman marries a Christian, her
children will be Christians, not Muslims.  When a Muslim marries a
kuffar and divorces her, she can not obtain custody of her children
because kuffar have no right to authority, as stated in . M13.2{c}.

    destroying their miserable house

The concept comes from Surah Al-Hashr 2. Full
comprehension requires reference to Surah Alanfal 57-

59:2.
He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the
Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their
homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get
out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from
Allâh! But Allâh’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they
expected it not, and He cast terror into
their hearts
, so that they destroyed
their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers.

Then take
admonition, O you with eyes
(to see).

8:57. So if you gain the mastery
over them in war, punish them severely
in order to disperse
those who are behind them, so that they may learn a
lesson.

Other translators include the concept of striking
terror in 8:57
. Muslims are commanded to treat their victims
harshly so as to terrorize prospective victims.

    commanded to fight

Moe confirmed the jihad imperative, as recorded in
sever hadith. This one stands out for its clarity: we are the targets,
its open season on us and we have no rights until we become
Muslims.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered
to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped
but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla
and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be
sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and
their reckoning will be with Allah.
” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah
that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and
property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the
right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers,
prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and
has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

    war on free speech

        impermissible

Reliance of the Traveller O8.7
lists twenty acts which entail apostasy, subjecting the apostate to
execution.  Reviling Allah, Moe or Islam gets a Muslim decapitated
as does any expression of doubt or denial of Allah’s existence and
wonderful character.  This law is imposed upon dhimmis in O11.10-5: Saying anything impermissible about
Islam. its deity or profit gets a dhimmi killed.

    slander

R2.2: Slander

Slander (ghiba) means to mention anything
concerning a person that he would dislike
, whether about his
body, religion, everyday life, self, disposition, property, son,
father, wife, servant, turban, garment, gait, movements, smiling,
dissoluteness, frowning, cheerfulness, or anything else connected with
him.

Mention means by word, writing, sign, or
indicating him with one’s eye, hand, head, and so forth.Body refers to
saying such things as that someone is blind, lame, bleary-eyed, bald,
short, tall, dark, or pale.

Religion includes saying that he is corrupt, a
thief, cannot be trusted, is a tyrant, does not care about the prayer,
does not watch to avoid filth, does not honor his father, does not
spend zakat on what it should be spent on, or does not avoid slandering
others.

    honoricide

Retaliation is prescribed for homicide &
manslaughter, but not for a Muslim who kills his progeny.

01.2 The following are not subject to
retaliation[ …]

o1.2 (4) a father or mother (or their fathers or

mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring’s

offspring;

Here is the scriptural & traditional basis for that ruling.

18:74.
Then they both proceeded, till they met a boy, he (Khidr) killed him.
Mûsa (Moses) said: “Have you killed an innocent person who had killed
none? Verily, you have committed a thing “Nukra” (a great Munkar –
prohibited, evil, dreadful thing)!”

18:80. “And as for the boy, his parents were believers, and we feared lest he should
oppress them by rebellion and disbelief
.

Sahih Bukhari Volume
6, Book 60, Number 249

March 31, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Qur’an Burning; Idiot’s Attitude: Respect for Islam


The video has disappeared from the AP article at Yahoo News. It is still available at the N.Y. Times.  48 seconds into the video,
general John Allen , Cmdr of Nato forces:

“I assure you, I promise you, this
was not intentional in any way and I
offer my sincere apology for any offense this may have caused.”

The article quotes the White House spokesman thusly.

Press
secretary 
Jay
Carney
 says it was a “deeply unfortunate
incident

that does not
reflect the respect the U.S. military has for the religious practices
of the Afghans.

I highlighted one clause that appears in other articles, but not within
quotes. I do not know whether Carney uttered or implied the sentiment
expressed in the highlighted clause.

From Reliefweb,
we learn of a U.N. statement expressing the same “respect”, describing
remarks by SRSG
Kubiš
.

He
stressed that the
United Nations deeply respects the Islamic faith, traditions and
culture of the Islamic
Republic of Afghanistan.

From CBSNEWS we learn that a military source said that
the Qur’ans were removed from the prison library because they “contained
extremist messages or inscriptions”.  The implication is that
prisoners had made marginal notes. Exactly what was in those notes?
Were they operational or motivational messages?

How would operational notes get out of the prison to
those who would implement them?  What is the difference between
motivational messages and the Qur’an, which exhorts Muslims to conquer
the world?  If we don’t want them to have access to incitement to
violence, then they should not have been given access to Qur’ans,
hadith, tafsir  & jurisprudence or the writings of Maududi,
Qutb, Al-Banna or Azam.   Is there any limit to the stupidity
& hypocrisy of our traitors?

Yeah, General, Taliban are sure to believe that
Qur’ans were collected, removed and sent to the garbage pile purely by
accident, without intent to destroy them.  We did not want the
prisoners to use them, the books are not in our language, and we did
not want the marginal notes to get out, so we disposed of the,
permanently.  You placed yourself in a bad position: you are
either incompetent or a liar.  Which is it, or  are you
both?

Removing the Qur’ans is not your error. Burning them
is not your mistake. Doing it in public, within  sight of the
enemy is a fatal mistake which has led to a dozen deaths and will
probably cause more death and suffering.  Next time, incinerate
the crap privately, in a proper facility and don’t advertise it.

Do any of those involved, including the White House,
Department of Defense, Department of State and United Nations
comprehend the plain meaning of words?  They said that they “respect Islam“.
Three classes of people “respect Islam”: ignoramuses, damned fools and
Muslims. Unfortunately, those classes are not mutually exclusive.

If you can respect a mercenary
war cult
whose doctrines sanctify genocidal
conquest,
terrorism
& slavery, then you have a terrible mental or moral
defect sufficient to warrant your removal from the gene pool of the
human race and from high office.

Islam is not incidental to the Accursed Abomination
and its aftermath; it is the central issue.  Allah’s damnable imperatives,
promises and threats which motivated the Magnificent Nineteen
to slaughter 3000 innocent people, are at the core of the
problem.  It is not possible to remove and permanently
exclude  Afghanistan from membership in the set of terror
sponsoring states without first removing Islam; Allah’s yoke of slavery
from the souls and necks of the people of Afghanistan and their
regime.  So long as they remain Muslim, all the blood and treasure
we have expended there are wasted, sacrificed to the demon of political
correctness.

Brigadier General S.K. Malik gave us the key to
victory in page sixty of “The
Quran’ic Concept of War
but our leaders are traitors,
unwilling to seize the key, insert it in the lock and turn it.
Pay particular attention to the sentences I have emphasized in this
crucial quote.

Terror cannot be struck into the
hearts of an army by merely


 cutting its lines of
communication or depriving it of its routes


of withdrawal. It is
basically related to the strength or weakness


of the human soul. It
can be instilled only if the opponent’s


Faith
is destroyed.

Psychological dislocation is temporary;


spiritual
dislocation is permanent
.
Psychological dislocation can be


produced by a physical act
but this does not hold good of the


spiritual dislocation. To
instill terror into the hearts of the enemy, 


it
is essential. in the ultimate analysis, to dislocate his Faith
. An

invincible Faith is immune to
terror. A weak Faith offers inroads


to terror. The
Faith conferred upon us by the Holy Qur’an has


the
inherent strength to ward off terror from us and to enable


us
to strike terror into the enemy.
Whatever the form or type of

strategy directed against the
enemy, it must, in order to be effective,


be capable of striking terror
into the hearts of the enemy. A strategy


that fails to attain this
condition suffers from inherent drawbacks


and weaknesses; and should be
reviewed and modified. This rule


is fully applicable to
nuclear as well as conventional wars. It is


equally true of the strategy
of nuclear deterrence in fashion


today. To be credible and
effective, the strategy of deterrence


must be capable of striking
terror into the hearts of the enemy.

If
we do not destroy Islam, nuking Afghanistan & Pakistan is our only
hope of victory: there will be no alternative to complete
extermination. The people of those enslaved nations must be made to
comprehend the fact that Allah is an impotent idol whose threat and
promise are vain.  They must throw off Islam’s yoke of slavery or
they must be exterminated.  Emancipation is morally superior to
extermination.  We needed to get started eleven years ago.

February 23, 2012 Posted by | Afghanistan, GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Pamela Geller Reams Them a New Orifice


Pamela Geller is fast, frustrated & furious in this 40 minute video
she reams indolent society a badly needed new orifice.  She has
much more than she can say in such a short time, but she gives us a
very good outline, drawing her points together to form a circle which
encompasses the globe full of issues.

Its war, and you are an army of one. Pamela is your
General.  She gives you your orders: learn and teach others.
If you do nothing more, at least watch this video and share it with
everyone who will listen.  Thanks and a tip of the hat to Front
Page Magazine

http://frontpagemag.com/2011/09/23/pamela-geller-wednesday-morning-club/

http://blip.tv/play/AYLUuVkC.html?p=1
http://a.blip.tv/api.swf#AYLUuVkC

Reading the Qur’an is not easy because it is
archaic, redundant and jumbled, lacking context & chronology.
The Noble Qur’an, translated by Hilali & Khan, is
reputed to be 95% accurate and contains parenthetical expressions from
tafsirs and the translator’s footnotes.  Several Surahs are
essential to understanding the malignantly militant nature of Islam: 2,
3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 33, 47, 48, 49 & 61.  You can select them
from a pick list at the top of the page.

Hadith are sayings of Muhammad, passed down from
mouth to ear by his companions.  They have been collected by
several scholars, the most widely accepted collection being that of Bukhari. Like the Qur’an, hadith collections
suffer from redundancy.  Begin with Books 52, 53 & 59, then
read the others if you have sufficient patience.

Tafsir are scholarly explanations of the Qur’an.
They use parallel verses and relevant ahadith to clarify the verses. Tafsir Ibn Kathir
is fairly complete and easily accessible. You can select the Surahs
listed above and read them instead of the Qur’an & hadith to save
time and effort.

Islamic biography and history are also important,
but less easily accessible than the Qur’an, hadith and tafsir.
Craig Winn compiled  selections  of the canon into a 1000
page book with the quotes compiled into handy appendices  “The Prophet of
Doom
“.

For those lacking the time, patience and ambition to
tackle the large tomes, there is a short book which encapsulates
the  most essential information: Suhas Majumdar’s “Jihad: The Islamic Doctrine of Permanent War“.

Pamela Geller raises the issue of Shari’ah: Islamic
law based on the Qur’an & hadith.  Much of it is arcane,
dealing with matters of prayer & ritual purity.  The really
important parts deal with “justice”, marriage & divorce.  It
will be easier for you go go to Amazon and buy a hard copy of Reliance
of the Traveller.  If you can tolerate a low resolution scan and
large, pdf, this link will get you into Chapter 9 of Book O;
“Justice”.You can scroll up to Books  N & M.

If you delve deeply into Reliance, you will discover
that divorce is affected by the husband’s thrice repeating “I divorce
you”.  You will discover that a father can force his virgin,
pre-pubescent daughter to marry the man of his choice.  You will
learn that a Christian woman married to a Muslim can not obtain child
custody in divorce.

January 25, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, Politics | , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Newt Gingrich Misses the Mark on Islam & Shari’ah


Newt Gingrich Misses the Mark on Islam & Shari’ah

News
Gingrich swerves dangerously close to the truth, but veers away at the
last moment.  Thanks and a tip of the hat to Pulp Ark, who posted
a link on Facebook.  I viewed the video and read the accompanying
article at Huffington Post.

give up Shari’ah

Including that phrase in a conditional clause is
either a token of irony or ignorance.  I am not sure which applies
in this case.  Abandonment of Shari’ah is an act of apostasy, one
of twenty such acts listed in Reliance of the Traveller, Book O8.7.

-14- to deny
the obligatory character of something which by the consensus of Muslims
(ijma`, def: B7) is part of Islam
, when it is well known as
such, like the prayer (salat) or even one rak’a from one of the five
obligatory prayers, if there is no excuse (def: u2.4);

-19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the
Sacred Law
;

Allah’s permissions, prohibitions 7 imperatives,
expressed in the Qur’an, are the primary source of Shari’ah.

Only Allah has the right to rule

 

5:44. […] And whosoever does not judge by what Allâh has
revealed
, such are the Kâfirûn (i.e. disbelievers
– of a lesser degree as they do not act on Allâh’s Laws ).

5:49.  And so judge (you O
Muhammad ) between them by what Allâh has revealed
and follow not their vain desires,
[…]

22:41. Those (Muslim rulers) who, if We give them
power in the land, (they) order
for Iqamat-as-Salât
. [i.e. to perform the five compulsory
congregational Salât (prayers) (the males in mosques)], to pay the Zakât and they enjoin
Al-Ma’rûf
(i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm orders
one to do), and forbid
Al-Munkar
(i.e. disbelief, polytheism and all that Islâm has
forbidden) [i.e. they make the Qur’ân
as the law of their country in all the spheres of life
]. And
with Allâh rests the end of (all) matters (of creatures).

33:36. It is not for a believer, man or
woman, when
Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any
option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger
,
he has indeed strayed in a plain error.

truly moderate

That phrase defines a hypocrite [47:20], not a believer. Believers are only those
who engage in jihad, killing others and being killed fighting in
Allah’s cause [9:111].

Newt appears to imply that he would endorse the candidacy of Dr. Zuhdi
Jasser
if he seeks high office.  I find Dr. Jasser to be an
exemplar of cognitive dissonance because, while professing to be
Muslim, he asserts that Islam can be modernized or reformed; that it is
compatible with our Constitution & Republic, which it clearly is
not.   You will not catch me knowingly voting for a Muslim,
including Dr. Jasser!

bring Islam into modernity

Dr. Jasser might as well try to fly by jumping off
his roof and flapping his arms like wings. Islam is perfected and
immutable.

5:3. […]This day, I have perfected your religion for you,
completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islâm as your religion.
[…]

6:115. And the Word of your Lord has been
fulfilled in truth and in justice. None can change His Words. And He is
the All­Hearer, the All­Knower.

10.64. […] No change can there be in the Words
of Allâh
, this is indeed the supreme success.

18:27. […] None can change His Words,
and none will you find as a refuge other than Him.

30:30. […] No change let there be in
Khalq­illâh (i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic Monotheism
),
that is the straight religion, but most of men know not. [Tafsir
At­Tabarî, Vol 21, Page 41]

Sahih Bukhari 8.76.585 […] ‘I will say: They are of me (i.e. my followers). It
will be said, ‘You do not know
what they innovated (new things) in the religion after you left’
.
I will say, ‘Far removed,
far removed (from mercy),
those who changed (their religion) after me
.” Abu Huraira
narrated that the Prophet said, “On the Day of Resurrection a group of
companions will come to me, but will be driven away from the
Lake-Fount, and I will say, ‘O Lord (those are) my companions!’ It will
be said, ‘You have no knowledge
as to what they innovated after you left; they turned apostate as
renegades
(reverted from Islam).”

depends entirely on the person

Is the person a Muslim in name only, or
is he a zealous Muslim concealing what he believes to avoid offending
potential voters?  In one of his books, President Obama said that
the would “side with the Muslims” if things turned ugly.  Who did
he side with in the “Arab spring”?  Who is he siding with on the
issue of censoring critic8ism of Islam?  Is he exemplifying his
belief or is he practicing al-Taqiyya?

3:28. Let
not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ
(supporters,
helpers, etc.) instead of the
believers
, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allâh
in any way, except if you
indeed fear a danger from them
. And Allâh warns you against
Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.

The Prohibition of Supporting the Disbelievers

[…](unless you indeed fear a
danger from them
) meaning, except those believers who in some
areas or times fear for their
safety from the disbelievers.
In this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship to the
disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly
. For instance,
Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda’ said, “We smile in the face of some people
although our hearts curse them
.” Al-Bukhari said that Al-Hasan
said, “The Tuqyah is allowed until the Day of Resurrection.” […]

A Muslim’s oath of office can not be trusted.
66:2 is in the context of marital disputes and 9:1 is in the context of
breaking the hudna with Mecca to facilitate conquest.  But the
hadith
collected by Muslim shows us that Muslims have a break your oath free
card from Moe.  This dispensation vitiates a Muslim’s oath.

66:2. Allâh
has already ordained for you (O men), the dissolution of your oaths
.
And Allâh is your Maula (Lord, or Master, or Protector, etc.) and He is
the All-Knower, the All-Wise.

9:1. Freedom
from (all) obligations (is declared) from Allâh and His Messenger

() to those of the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters,
disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh), with whom you made a treaty.

9:3. And a declaration from
Allâh and His Messenger to mankind
on the greatest day (the 10th
of Dhul-Hijjah – the 12th month of Islâmic calendar) that Allâh is free from (all) obligations
to the Mushrikûn
(see V.2:105) and so is His Messenger. So if
you (Mushrikûn) repent, it is better for you, but if you turn away,
then know that you cannot escape (from the Punishment of) Allâh. And
give tidings (O Muhammad ) of a painful torment to those who
disbelieve.

9:4. Except those of the Mushrikûn with whom you have a treaty, and who
have not subsequently failed you in aught,
nor have supported anyone against
you.
So fulfill their treaty to them to the end of their term.
Surely Allâh loves Al- Mattaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).

Sahih Muslim Book 015, Number 4052:

Abu Huraira reported: A person sat
late in the night with Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him), and
then came to his family and found that his children had gone to sleep.
His wife brought food for him. but he took an oath that he would not
eat because of his children (having gone to sleep without food) He then
gave precedence (of breaking the vow and then expiating it) and ate the
food
He then came to Allah s Messenger (may peace be upon him)
and made mention of that to him, whereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace
he upon him) said: He who took
an oath and (later on) found
something better than that should do that, and
expiate for (breaking) his vow
.

recognize all religions

Islam is declared to be perfect, final &
superior.  Allah declares Jews & Christians to be the “worst of living creatures” Allah, his angels and
Muslims curse Jews & Christians.  The religion with Allah is Islam, and nothing else will be accepted.  A Muslim who
tolerates other religions is either ignorant, deceptive or an apostate.

a President who tells the truth

Yes, we need a truthful President. First, we must
find truthful candidates who will acknowledge the fact that Islam is
the existential & irreconcilable enemy, with whom negotiation is
fruitless. It is Islam, not Wahhabism, ‘radicalism’ or
‘extremism’.  Islam’s perpetual enmity and aggression are
functions of the core doctrines of Islam, having nothing to do with
nationality or sect.

modern Muslim

There is no moderate Islam. There is no modern
Islam.  Islam is what Moe preached and practiced 1400 years ago,
not what you wish it to be.  Islam is defined by the Qur’an, which
is immutable because the text forbids editing and Moe’s sunnah, which
does not change because he is dead.

Shari’ah

If Allah or Moe said it or did it, it is
Shari’ah.  A Muslim who abjures Shari’ah signs his death warrant
for believers to execute.  Because Shari’ah is primarily derived
from the Qur’an, it is impossible to abjure it without abjuring
Islam.

mortal threat

If one is a Muslim believer, one is a mortal threat
to every person who is not a Muslim.  Exactly what part of Islam
do you not comprehend?

8:39. And fight
them until there is no more Fitnah
(disbelief and polytheism:
i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all
be for Allâh Alone
[in the whole of the world ]. But if they
cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is
All-Seer of what they do.

9:29. Fight
against those who
(1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among the people of the
Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with
willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers
their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be
the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and
are killed
. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in
the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is
truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you
have concluded. That is the supreme success .

if HAMAS would recognize Israel

If pigs grew wings they could fly.  HAMAS is
Islam.  Allah promised Muslims that they would conquer the world, irreversibly.  Allah’s judgment is final,
there is none to put it back, but Israel recovered some of her
territory stolen by Muslims in 638 & 1948.  That recovery of
territory is the ultimate blasphemy; empirical proof of the fact that
Allah is an impotent idol.  If you expect Muslims to tolerate
that, you need a brain transplant.  It has not happened in 63
years, and it will never happen because it ain’t possible.

throw
out the folks

Brilliant idea, Newt, you found the solution!
Expel the Muslims from Israel, including Judea & Samaria.  But
you must also push them back beyond rocket range.

January 19, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Islamic Reform, Islamic Terrorism, Israel, Jihad, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Urinating Marines: No Harm Done


While urinating on the corpses of enemy combatants may technically violate the Geneva Accords, the enemy is not a signatory.  The act also violated the letter and spirit of Marine Core regulations.  The men involved should have been smart enough not to allow the act to be photographed.   Maintenance of discipline may require punishment, but I agree with Rep. West; their punishment should be minimal.

Urinating on dead Taliban has no effect on ‘peace talks’ . Anyone who believes that talking with Muslims can result in peace needs to take care in passing gas & wiping to avoid brain damage.  Nothing can make Muslims hate us more than they already do, either. Muslims hate us because we are not Muslims, no provocation is required.

The conflict with Islam is existential: it can only end in the extinction of one side or the other. Either Islam goes to Hell or Western Civilization goes, no other outcome is possible. Both the electorate and our Congressmen & President need to know the  fatal facts of Islam.

Allah commands Muslims to wage war against disbelievers.  The jihad imperatives are expressed as fight … until loops.

  • 8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
  • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
    Narrated Anas bin Malik:
    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

    • 33:21. Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad ) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day and remembers Allâh much.
  • Sunan Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2526

    Narrated Anas ibn Malik:

    The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, “There is no god but Allah” and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist). The tyranny of any tyrant and the justice of any just (ruler) will not invalidate it. One must have faith in Divine decree.

Is there some part of ‘fight them until’, ‘fight those who until’, ‘ordered to fight’ and ‘performed continuously’ that they do not comprehend?  The j8ihad imperatives are codified in Shari’ah, best exemplified in Reliance of the Traveller, Book O9.8: “The caliph makes war” & “The caliph fights”.  From Hedaya, we learn that “War must be carried on against the Infidels, at all times, by some party of the Muslims.” and is undertaken offensively, on Islam’s initiative, not defensively: “The destruction of the sword  is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are generally received this effect.”

From the Islamic perspective, peace is the result of conquest. There can be no peace until the entire world is conquered.  Islam does not negotiate peace, it negotiates hudna, for a maximum term of ten years or until it is able to resume attacks, whichever comes first.  Why did we fight two Barbary Wars?

  • 47:35. So be not weak and ask not for peace (from the enemies of Islâm), while you are having the upper hand. Allâh is with you, and will never decrease the reward of your good deeds.

 

January 13, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness | , , | 1 Comment

Open Letter To Rick Santorum


Dear Mr. Santorum,

Your answer to a question about national security issues involving
Afghanistan  exposes a vital element of truth on the surface,
while an unpleasant stream of hypocrisy flows beneath the
surface.

Thanks and a tip of the hat to Paul Hoffman, whose
Facebook post brought to my attention Robert Spencer’s post, where I found this video
clip.

How
long

do you want to wait?  Until the security of our country is
ensured, that’s what the job of the commander of chief is and you make
that decision, not the generals–you make that decision based on an
analysis of how virulent the
threat of radical Islam
is and you confront that threat not just militarily, and importantly,
not just militarily, you
confront it first by being honest
with the
American public
about what this threat is.

This President has sanitized every defense document,
everything, the word radical Islam does not appear anywhere , why?
because we are fighting political correct — we are trying to fight
this politically correct war
and not being honest with the American
public as to who the enemy is, how virulently they are and why they
hate us and what we must do to stop…

 

how long ?

The question of the duration of our occupation of
Afghanistan can not be answered with a clock, calendar or time
table.

strategic objectives

national security

If the strategic objective is to permanently
end  Afghanistan’s membership in the set of state sponsors of
terrorism and prevent Afghanistan from being used as a training ground
and staging area for terrorists, then the eradication of Islam from
Afghanistan is the criteria for ending the occupation. We bring the
troops home when the population of Afghanistan and their government are
totally free from the influence of the damnable doctrines of Islam
which inculcate hatred and enjoin genocidal conquest which is won by
casting terror.

In that case, you remove our troops from Afghanistan
when its population is either apostatized or converted and its
government is able and willing to secure its borders
against infiltration from neighboring countries infested with
Muslims.

free, democratic & secure

If the strategic objective is, as Shrub stated, a
free, democratic, secure & prosperous Afghanistan with a stable
government which respects human equality, dignity & rights,
then cleansing Afghanistan from the infestation of Islam  is
insufficient.  In this case, Afghanistan must be cleansed from its
long tradition of tribalism and its honor/shame culture as well.
Good luck with that; measure the occupation in millenia, not
centuries.

how virulent

how infectious

Islam spread from Mecca & Medina to infect all
of Arabia, North Africa, the Levant, nearly half of Asia and South East
Europe in a few centuries. Infected persons now infest Western Europe
and America and are spreading the infection through our prisons and
inner cities.

how malignant

It is impossible to count with accuracy, the many
innocent victims of Islam, but the best estimate runs to 270 million.

radical Islam

radical Englishmen

Were the founders fighting ‘radical’ Englishmen in
the Revolution against King George or were they fighting his army?

radical Nazis

Was the greatest generation in combat against
‘radical’ Nazis ?  Were those ‘radicals’ a tiny minority of Nazis?
Was there a peaceful majority of Nazis who did not want to participate
in world conquest?

radical Communism

Did millions die of starvation at the hands of
Stalin, Mao & Pot because of an extraordinary, ‘radical’ variant of
International Communism?  Was the Cold War fought against ‘radcal’
Communism or the real thing?

radical Muslims

Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to
relive it. I quote from Wikipedia’s entry on the First
Barbary War
:  “On
October 11, 1784, Moroccan pirates seized the brigantine 
Betsey.[2]   “Algeria
began piracy against the U.S. on July 25, 1785 with the capture of the
schooner 
Maria and the Dauphin a week later.[5]

Where the Barbary Pirates ‘radicals’, ‘perverting’,
‘distorting’ and ‘twisting’ normative Islamic doctrine into a perverted
form, or were they acting in obedience to Allah; emulating their
Prophet?  Thomas Jefferson and John Adams put the question to
Tripoli’s Ambassador in 1785. His reply is a clue for you.

It
was written in
their Koran
, that all nations which had not acknowledged the
Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of
the faithful to plunder and enslave;
and that every mussulman
who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise.
He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one
slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck
of an enemy’s ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third
in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into
the foe
that they cried out for quarter at once. 
[12]

Koran

Is that true? Is it really written in their Koran
that they have a right and duty to plunder and enslave?

right & duty

2:216.
Jihâd (holy
fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is ordained for you
(Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing
which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you.
Allâh knows but you do not know.

8:39.
And fight them
until
there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e.
worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will
all be for Allâh Alone

[in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others
besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

9:29.
Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until
they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves
subdued.

Ordained means it is Allah’s law. “fight until” makes the statements
imperative.  The Koran commands Muslims to wage perpetual war
against disbelievers.

plunder

8:1.
They ask you (O Muhammad ) about the spoils of war.
Say: “The spoils
are for Allâh and the Messenger
.”
So fear Allâh and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey
Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), if you are believers.

8:41.
And know that whatever
of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is
assigned to Allâh, and to the Messenger
,
and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad )], (and also)
the orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have
believed in Allâh and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad
) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the
two forces met (the battle of Badr) – And Allâh is Able to do all
things.

8:67.
It is not for a
Prophet that he should have prisoners of war
(and free them with
ransom) until he
had made a great slaughter
(among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of
this world
(i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives),
but Allâh desires
(for you) the Hereafter
. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

33:26.
And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the
disbelievers) Allâh
brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their
hearts
, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a
group (of them) you
made captives
.

33:27.
And He caused you
to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches
, and
a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all
things.

48:19.
And abundant spoils
that they will capture. And Allâh is Ever All-Mighty, All-Wise.

Isn’t that special: the Koran has rules for
distribution of spoils, in anticipation of offensive warfare.  Moe
got the top 205, first pick of the spoils.  And as a Prophet, Moe
was not allowed to ransom prisoners until he had made great slaughter.
We learned that Moe’s motivation was mercenary and Allah’s is blood
lust.

Moe besieged a local Jewish settlement, overcame
them with terrorism and seized their property, enslaving their widows
& orphans.  Allah promised the Muslims “abundant spoils”.

Paradise

9:38.
O you who believe! What
is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the
Cause of Allâh
(i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the
earth?

Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter?
But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with
the Hereafter.

9:39.
If you march not
forth
, He
will punish you with a painful torment
and will replace you by
another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do
all things.

48:17.
No blame or sin is there upon the blind, nor is there blame or sin upon
the lame, nor is there blame or sin upon the sick (that they go not
forth to war). And whosoever
obeys Allâh and His Messenger
(Muhammad ), He will admit him to
Gardens beneath which rivers flow
(Paradise); and whosoever turns back, He
will punish him with a painful torment
.

61:10.
O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will
save you from a painful torment
.

61:11.
That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and
fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives
,
that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12.
(If you do so) He
will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which
rivers flow
, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn ­ Eternity
[‘Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.

If Muslims do  not join the jihad, they will go
to Hell;
if the fight, they will go to  There is a long and esoteric hadith
about Umar’s sending the army to fight the great nations, in which a
Muslim General is quoted as explaining things to a Persian General in
similar terms.   Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386

Our Prophet, the
Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you
till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya
(i.e. tribute); and
our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us
is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise
to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us
remain alive, shall become your master
.”

.

“Its Islam, stupid!”

What Allah commanded and Moe exemplified is
Islam, the real thing, not a distortion, twisting or perversion of
Islam. There is no such thing as radical Islam.  Islam is what Moe
preached & practiced, not the anodyne, passive & benevolent
religion you wish it would be.

not just militarily

Islam can not be defeated militarily short of
wholesale extermination.  If you are unable or unwilling to kill
every Muslim on the face of the earth, then you must break their faith, you must induce mass
apostasy.

expose Allah

Effectively combating Islam requires inducing mass
apostasy by introducing the Ummah to the reality of Allah and his
Messenger, their true character and works.  You must effectively
discredit Moe, and thereby descredit Allah. You must expose the fallacy
of Allah’s promises.

war of ideas

If you would win this war, list the ideas of Islam
and the ideas of Western Civilization and prove our ideas to be
superior to theirs, in intrinsic merit as well as empirical results.

honest about the threat

When you add adjectives or modifiers to the name of
the enemy, you are not being honest.  The enemy is Islam, not
‘radical Islam’. In the long run, the threat is existential; Islam is
Hellbent on global conquest.  In the short run, the threat is
continued and escalating attacks, large and small, against civilian
targets.  Once Iran obtains a nuke and couples it with a delivery
system, our cities will be in grave danger.

politically correct

President Bush called Islam a “great religion of
peace” because he knew that, if the public knew the truth, there would
be a massive popular demand for the eradication of the
enemy.   President Obama repeats the same lie and declares
that we are not at war against Islam because he is a traitor, one of
them, not one of us.

sanitized

President Obama has removed all reference to the
false meme which has been substituted for the name of the enemy because
he is politically correct, not factually correct.

In order to win, we need to identify and truthfully
describe the enemy, its intentions and capacity. The traitor in the
White House has no desire to defeat the enemy because he is one of
them, at the head of the enemy’s fifth column.
Removing all acknowledgment of the nexus between Islamic doctrine and
terrorism is in compliance with the demands of Islam and the United
Nations.

the enemy

Islam, as revealed & exemplified by Moe.

virulence

Islam demands that only Allah be worshiped, “alltogether and everywhere“. Allah demands “great slaughter“. The gates of Paradise will not
swing open to Muslims until they exterminate the Jews.

why they
hate us

Because we are not Muslims. Disbelief is a status
offense, called Kufr: rebellion against Allah, the punishment for which
is described in 5:33
and the definition of which is found in Tafsir Ibn Kathir.

what we must do

Either cause Muslims to quit believing in Allah, his
threat & promise, breaking his yoke of slavery or cause them to
quit living.  That should be an easy choice.

I want you to:

Take your own advice, be honest about the identity
of the enemy, its character, ability & intentions and what we must
do to win this war and restore peace 7 security. First and foremost:
quit adding adjectives to the name of the enemy.

January 8, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Jihad, Political Correctness, Politics | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Unthinking Regression: Bashing Santorum over ‘Islamophobia’


http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/01/05/398688/santorum-islam-eradicate/?mobile=nc

Think Progress uttered & published a nasty diatribe against Rick Santorum. Thanks and a tip of the hat to Bare Naked Islam.

UPDATED With Audio: Rick Santorum’s Islamophobia ProblemBy Ali Gharib on Jan 5, 2012 at 5:33 pm

right-wing

That is one of the favorite slurs of LibTards.   The connotation is Nazi~fascist but there is no linkage between Conservatism and National Socialism or fascism.  The Declaration of Independence & Constitution are not related to Mein Kampf.

attitude toward Islam

Given the Author’s name, it is easy to predict what follows. Anyone not in love with Islam must be extremely evil.

endorsed profiling

When we hear hoof beats, do we look out for unicorns?  The Magnificent Nineteen were all Muslims.  They pronounced Takbir while slitting the throats of the flight crews.  Their leader ordered them to do so: “Shout, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers.”.
The man who co-ordinated Atta’s martyrdom operation proudly declared that the attack was done as an act of worship: “These actions are our offerings to God.

The fine art of hijacking airliners was popularized and perfected by Muslims.  Why then should the attention of the TSA be directed anywhere other than towards Muslims?   We could save a great deal of time, money and hassle by simply banning Muslims from mass transit vehicles and terminals.

“radical Islam”

Islam does not require modifiers; I wish that everyone, including Rick Santorum, would quit wasting words and call it what it is: Islam. Use of modifiers such as “radical” falsely implies the existence of an anodyne, passive & benign normative Islam.

Jihad, defined in Islamic law as: “to war against non-Muslims“, is “ordained” for Muslims. “casting terror” is a battle tactic sanctified by Allah and bragged about by Moe. Muslims are promised extra credit (deed of righteousness) for any act taken to injure or enrage disbelievers.

Genocidal jihad & terrorism are normative Islam, neither extreme nor radical; participation in them is a function of intense belief, neither innovation nor esoteric doctrine.

conflates extremists with

the entire Muslim faith

The Magnificent Nineteen were believers, not extremists. Islam does not have extremists, it has believers who obey Allah and emulate Moe.

all-encompassing ideology

Islam is a “Deen”: way of life. The Qur’an & hadith dictate everything from conception to burial. If you have any doubt, examine the table of contents of Sahih Buchari, the most authentic hadith collection, and Reliance of the Traveller, the handbook of Shari’ah.

religious freedom

Conquered Jews & Christians are not permitted to display crosses, ring bells, hold religious processions, pray or read the Bible aloud in public, build or maintain churches. Doubters & dissenters should read Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 11.5.

It is assumed that Islam is a religion, and therefore we are obligated by the free exercise clause of the First Amendment, to permit Muslims to practice it here.  Under that assumption, Muslims have a right to attack, plunder & kill us and enslave our widows & orphans.  The ignorant masses are not cognizant of the fact that Islam entails those actions.

Allah commanded Muslims to attack Jews and Christians; to wage war against them until they are subjugated and make annual extortion payments. That command is clear on the face of 9:29, confirmed by Moe in Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 and codified in Islamic law by Reliance of the Traveller O9.8.

Muslims are commanded to attack those disbelievers nearest them in 9:123. A minimum of one military expedition must be mounted in every year, and if neglected when possible, all who know of the obligation are in sin, specified in Reliance of the Traveller O9.1.  Disbelieving men are killed; their widows & orphans enslaved as exemplified by 33:26-27 and codified in Reliance of the Traveller. O9.13 – 9.14.

Islam is not “cafeteria Catholicism”, it is all or nothing. This quote from 2:85 makes the matter crystal clear: “Then do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest? Then what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be consigned to the most grievous torment.”

Muslims are threatened with “painful torment” in Hell if they shirk jihad and promised eternity in Allah’s celestial bordello if they go to war. If a Muslim truly believes Allah’s threat and promise, what will he do?

Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387, besides confirming the jihad imperatives, has vital clues for you:  you are the prey, its open season, and you have no rights, as made clear by these excerpts: “And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us ” “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

If Muslims have a right to practice Islam then our rights to life, liberty & property are abrogated; null and void.  Which is it?  One or the other, not both; either we have a right to live free and secure in our property or they have a right to practice Islam. Which is it?

Dialogue

The article quotes Santorum [Emphasis original.]

Until we have the kind of discussion and dialogue with Islam — that democracy and freedom of religion, along with religious pluralism, are essential for the stability of the world and our ability to cohabit in this world. Unless Islam is willing to make that conscious decision, then we are going to be at war for a long time.

.
The proposed dialogue is useless because jihad is ordained for Muslims, required to be performed in every year until the last day or until the entire world is conquered, whichever comes first. Islam is theocratic, not democratic because only Allah has the right to legislate. Religious pluralism is out of the question because 3:2 “Allâh! Lâ ilahâ illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He), ” Also Muslims are commanded to wage war until only Allah is worshiped on a global scale, in 8:39. If Muslims abandon jihad in favor of trade, commerce or agriculture, Allah will make disgrace to prevail over them.

Islamophobia

Phobia implies irrational fear or loathing. Fear and loathing of Islam are anything but irrational. Since 622, Islam has been responsible for 270*106 premature deaths.  Both the doctrines of Islam enshrined in the Qur’an and the resulting conquest which built an empire that encompassed nearly half the world confirm the fact that Islam is a worthy object of fear & loathing.

extremist ideologies

The concluding paragraph demonstrates unwillingness to face the fatal fact of Islam.

No decent American — or anyone across the globe — should oppose “eradicat(ing)” extremist ideologies like militant, “radical Islam.” But Santorum’s history of statements raises questions about just exactly what and who he’s targeting for eradication.

The founder of Islam declared that he was:

That is not an extremist; that is not a radical; that is the role model for all Muslims to emulate, in all places, at all times. Normative Islam is defined by the Qur’an and exemplified by Moe’s sunnah. As a wise man said “Its Islam, stupid!”. Secure peace can not be established without eradicating Islam.

January 7, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Jihad, Political Correctness | 4 Comments

Respond to Zawahiri’s Ransom Demands!!


ABC News reports that Zawahiri claims to have possession of an American citizen who disappeared in Pakistan. He is demanding outrageous concessions for releasing the captive.

If we had a President worthy of the title, he would curse Zawahiri, telling him to “go to Hell”.  He would reject Zawahiri’s demands and order the summary execution of one captured enemy combatant every day until Warren Weinstein is released alive and unharmed.

There must be no concession made to Islam, no negotiation, no surrender and no submission.  Instead, Islam must be eradicated from the earth because conquest and hostage takings are intrinsic sacraments of Islam. Let all men of good will rise up and curse Islam because of this fact which is clear on the face of its scripture, confirmed by its oral tradition, clarified by exegesis and codified in Shari’ah:

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

(It is not for a Prophet to have captives of war until he had made a great slaughter (among the enemies) in the land. You desire the commodities of this world, but Allah desires (for you) the Hereafter. Allah is Mighty and Wise. Were it not for a prior decree from Allah, a severe torment would have touched you for what you took.) (8:67-68)[The Command to strike the Enemies’ Necks, tighten Their Bonds, and then free Them either by an Act of Grace or for a Ransom]

 

9:5. Then when the Sacred Months (the Ist, 7th, 11th, and 12th months of the Islâmic calendar) have passed, then kill the Mushrikûn (see V.2:105) wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and prepare for them each and every ambush. But if they repent and perform As-Salât (Iqâmat-as-Salât), and give Zakât, then leave their way free. Verily, Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

(And fight not with them at Al-Masjid Al-Haram, unless they fight you there. But if they attack you, then fight them. )﴿2:191﴾ Allah said here,

﴿وَخُذُوهُمْ﴾

(and capture them), executing some and keeping some as prisoners,

﴿وَاحْصُرُوهُمْ وَاقْعُدُواْ لَهُمْ كُلَّ مَرْصَدٍ﴾

(and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush), do not wait until you find them. Rather, seek and besiege them in their areas and forts, gather intelligence about them in the various roads and fairways so that what is made wide looks ever smaller to them. This way, they will have no choice, but to die or embrace Islam, [This is the Ayah of the Sword]

 

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

This honorable Ayah was revealed with the order to fight the People of the Book, after the pagans were defeated, the people entered Allah’s religion in large numbers, and the Arabian Peninsula was secured under the Muslims’ control. Allah commanded His Messenger to fight the People of the Scriptures, Jews and Christians, on the ninth year of Hijrah, and he prepared his army to fight the Romans and called the people to Jihad announcing his intent and destination. The Messenger sent his intent to various Arab areas around Al-Madinah to gather forces, and he collected an army of thirty thousand. [The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah]

 

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

 

O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

“Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29),

the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be peace).  After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad. As for the Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

“I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,”

this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).

O9.9

The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n: though according to the Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers, are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sole exceptions to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs, neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh Bidaya al-mubtadi’ (y21), 6.48-49) ).

O9.13

When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.

O9.14

When an adult male is taken captive, the caliph (def: o25) considers the interests (O: of Islam and the Muslims) and decides between the prisoner’s death, slavery, release without paying anything, or ransoming himself in exchange for money or for a Muslim captive held by the enemy.

If the prisoner becomes a Muslim (O: before the caliph chooses any of the four alternatives) then he may not be killed, and one of the other three alternatives is chosen.

 

Why do they attack us? Because of Islam’s damnable doctrines, not poverty, ignorance, repression or occupation. For the same damnable doctrines explained to the Persians and to John Q. Adams & Thomas Jefferson.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 386:
Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

In 1786 Jefferson and John Adams went to negotiate with Tripoli’s envoy to London, Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman or (Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja). They asked him by what right he extorted money and took slaves. Jefferson reported to Secretary of State John Jay, and to the Congress:

The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven.

Exactly what part of that do you not comprehend?  What mental or moral defect prevents you from recognizing the ultimate evil and demanding its extinction?  Do you carry your brain between your buttocks?

This is not hate speech, it is a statement of verifiable facts and valid opinion based on those facts. This is not incitement to violence, it is a demand for official recognition of the state of war declared by Moe in 623 and prosecuted against us since the War of Revolution.  This is not a call for genocide and extermination camps, it is a disrespectful demand for effective retaliation against attack and the permanent prevention of repeat attacks. There is no substitute for victory. Victory is the eradication of Islam.

While there are Muslims living upon the face of the earth who believe Allah’s promise of Paradise if they wage war against us and his threat of eternal burning if they do not, we shall have neither peace nor security.  We have two alternatives: cause them to quit believing or quit living.  Lets get started immediately, ten years  late.

December 1, 2011 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Islamic Terrorism | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

CAIR Denounces Santorum’s Call for Profiling


CAIR Denouces Santorum’s Call For Profiling

One of my Google Alerts was triggered by an article about a CAIR press
release demanding that the GOP denounce Rick Santorum’s debate answer
on profiling. Video of the debate segment is linked below, and embedded
where possible.  Play it twice, once to listen and once to watch
the facial expressions and gestures, particularly those of Rep. Paul
and Herman Cain.

The text of CAIR’s  press release and my
analysis follow the video. Thanks and a tip of the hat to Breitbart!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=va6PVE7QkUY


WASHINGTONNov. 23, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/
— The Council on American-Islamic Relations
(CAIR) today called on
the
Republican Party to
repudiate
GOP presidential hopeful Rick Santorum‘s
call for profiling of American Muslims.

In
a debate aired on CNN last night, Santorum was asked if he would
support ethnic and religious profiling. CNN’s Wolf Blitzer,
the debate’s moderator, asked Santorum: “So just to be precise, is it
ethnic profiling, religious profiling, who would be profiled
?”

“The
folks who are most
likely to be committing
these crimes,” replied
Santorum. “Obviously
Muslims
would be someone you’d look at,
absolutely.”

Video:
Rick Santorum Calls for Profiling of Muslims

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=va6PVE7QkUY

In
a statement released today, CAIR National Legislative Director Corey Saylor said:

“Last
night, Rick
Santorum
 casually
tossed aside every American’s constitutional right to
equal protection

under the law in favor of discriminatory profiling of Muslims. Mr.
Santorum’s obvious lack of appreciation for the
Constitution
and for
the rejection of
profiling by top law enforcement experts
raises
reasonable questions
about his ability to lead our multi-faith nation
.

“The
International
Association of Chiefs of Police and other security
specialists
reject racial profiling. President Bush called it
‘wrong.

In 2009, President Obama
pledged to end the counterproductive practice
.

“We
remind Mr. Santorum that the Prophet Jesus (peace be
upon him), a man of Middle Eastern heritage, would fit his ‘profile
.’

“It
is time for all Republican presidential candidates to reject
Islamophobic rhetoric. Just as past candidates have learned the folly
of targeting other religious or ethnic minorities, serious presidential
hopefuls must reject the use anti-Muslim smears
and the exploitation of
Islamophobia for cheap political gain.”

CAIR
also thanked another GOP presidential candidate, Representative Ron Paul of Texas, for
rejecting profiling and refusing to sacrifice the rule of law.

A
CAIR Legislative Fact Sheet states that profiling is
unconstitutional
,
hinders anti-terrorism efforts and “diverts precious law
enforcement
resource
s away from investigations of individuals who have been
linked
to terrorist activity by specific and credible evidence.”

SEE:
CAIR Legislative Fact Sheet on Profiling

http://tinyurl.com/7wf3v7y

Earlier
this year, Santorum called “Sharia,” or Islamic
principles, “evil.
” He told a group in New Hampshire:
“We need to define it and say what it is. And it is evil.” In a past
“lecture on Islam,” Santorum falsely claimed the Quran, Islam’s
revealed text, was written in “Islamic.”

SEE:
Santorum, GOP Continue Anti-Sharia Campaign

http://tinyurl.com/4ml97xd

Last
week, CAIR called on state and national GOP leaders to demand the
resignation of a Tennessee lawmaker
after he suggested in a radio interview that U.S. Muslims should “go
back to where they came from” if they objected to his recent call for
the removal of all Muslims serving in the military.

CAIR:
TN GOP Rep. Tells Muslims to ‘Go Back to Where They Came From’

http://bit.ly/uetuEF

A
number of recent reports have documented the disturbing growth and
promotion of Islamophobia in American society.

CAIR:
Same Hate, New Target

http://tinyurl.com/66enzm8

Center for American Progress: Fear, Inc.

http://tinyurl.com/7cozjxg

Southern Poverty Law Center: Jihad Against Islam

http://tinyurl.com/3qsv2v8

People for the American Way: The Right-Wing Playbook on Anti-Muslim
Extremism

http://tinyurl.com/6j9fttw

CAIR
is America’s largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization.
Its mission is to enhance the understanding of Islam, encourage
dialogue, protect civil liberties, empower American Muslims, and build
coalitions that promote justice and mutual understanding.

CONTACT:
CAIR National Legislative Director Corey
Saylor
, 202-384-8857, E-Mail: csaylor@cair.com;
CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim
Hooper
, 202-744-7726, or 202-488-8787, E-Mail: ihooper@cair.com;
CAIR Communications Coordinator Amina
Rubin
, 202-488-8787, 202-341-4171, E-Mail: arubin@cair.com

SOURCE
Council on American-Islamic Relations

 

called on GOP to repudiate

The days of the smoke filled room backstage at the
national convention are long gone.  The real nominating process
belongs to the party membership, not to the hierarchy.  Condemning
stands taken by candidates is not the role of the RNC or the state
central committees.

CAIR is engaging in intimidation tactics, trying to
cast terror into the hearts of nervous Nellie political consultants who
conceive of political correctness as holy writ.  The RNC, Santorum
and the rational candidates should denounce CAIR’s political terror
tactics and tell CAIR to sit down, shut up and mind their own business.

I swear that, if the Republican Party surrenders to
CAIR’s outrageous demand, lifting Allah’s tail and inserting their
tongues, I will not vote for any Republican candidate who does not
explicitly condemn Islam.

profiling of American Muslims

That  is a prime example of misdirection.
Attention of security personnel should be focused on Muslims, regardless of
nationality
.
While 9/11 was perpetrated by foreigners, many of the recent plots
involved American citizens.  When you hear hoof beats, do you look
for unicorns or horses?

just to be precise

Precise questioning is a good thing, particularly in
court rooms, but in this case, what appears
on the surface, to be  precision
is entrapment.  A genuine precision question would not include
“precise” in its rhetoric.  I have no doubt that Blitzer was
setting Santorum up for this.

ethnic || religious: who would be profiled

That question misdirects attention away from the
real issue.  Terrorism is an intrinsic function of Islam, not
primarily linked to nationality or race.  Most recent mass
casualty terror attacks have been perpetrated by Muslims.

Islam is neither a race nor a religion; it is a way
of life which dictates every facet of human life, spiritual &
temporal. Islam has inseverable & interdependent  religious,
economic and military components. All of those components involve jihad. Jihad is the preferred alternative to trade &
agriculture economies.

Little old Catholic ladies and Baptist babies do not
commit terror attacks, young Muslim men do. That should be a clue for
you.  Rep. Paul cites Timothy McVeigh, the exception which proves
the rule.  How many nitrate bombs have been planned or planted by
lapsed Catholics?  Compare that to the number of improvised
explosive devices planned or planted by Muslims.

Muslims come in all colors.  Eliminate
Islam and Islamic terrorism will be eliminated.  If you want
travel to be safe, exclude Muslims from mass transit facilities and
vehicles.  That would impede but not stop the Times Square
Bomber.  To stop the multitude of alternative attack methods and
venues, it is necessary to remove and exclude those persons most likely
to engage in terrorism: Muslims.

most likely to be committing: Muslims

Why would Santorum say that? Baptists,
Buddhists  & Hindus are not turning up in the news for
bombings every month, Muslims are. Why is that?  Who besides Moe
preached and exemplified terrorism to his disciples?  “Its Islam,
stupid!” Why did Khalid Sheik Mohammed and his excellent
companions attack
us?  Get a clue.

Cover page of confession.

First page of confession.

Obviously Muslims

It is obvious to Santorum why is it not obvious to
others?  Is it not common knowledge that Islamic terrorism is
perpetrated by Muslims?  Is it not common knowledge that terror
attacks are an act of worship?  Is it not common knowledge that
Allah commanded casting terror into the hearts of enemies?  Is it
not common knowledge that disbelievers are the enemies of
Muslims?  Those facts are objectively true, why are they not
common knowledge?  The answers are political correctness and
intimidation.

constitutional right to equal protection

Equal protection of the laws means no class
distinctions; nobody is punished or immunized based on his social or
economic status.  Equal protection  means that Baptists,
Catholics & atheists are all protected from Islamic terror attacks
by excluding terrorists from places where innocent people
congregate.

Applying extra scrutiny to those persons most likely
to engage in terror attacks does not deny equal protection of the laws.
It does not impair anyone’s constitutional rights. One bright Tuesday
in September, ’01, several thousand people had their right to life
denied by Muslims who hijacked aircraft.  Keeping those Muslims
off of those flights would not have impaired any rights.  Keeping
them out of this nation would not have impaired anyone’s rights.

appreciation for the Constitution

The Constitution provides protection for the right
to life and the right to free speech. It is CAIR, not Santorum who
lacks appreciation for those rights. CAIR demands censorship of all
criticism of Islam.  CAIR applies intimidation tactics to close
private venues to those who speak out against it.  CAIR seeks to
deny effective protection from terror attacks.  This is a prime
example of hypocrisy & projection.

law enforcement experts

Appeal to authority is a logical fallacy.
Terrorism is a military issue, not a law enforcement issue.  Had
all Muslims been excluded from all domestic flights as they should be,
the Accursed Abomination would have been impossible; 3000 people would
be alive and healthy.   Why has Israel not lost any aircraft
recently?  How did they stop hijackings and prevent flying
bombs?  If you want to stop air based terrorism, consult Israel’s
experts forst.

lead our multi-faith nation

How do the leadership requirements vary between
monocultural and multicultural nations?  What difference does it
make to the Presidency whether we have no, 1, 2 or any number of
religions?

The President can not lead Muslims. Muslims are
commanded not to place themselves in positions subordinate to kuffar.
Take a close look at Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:51 Surah At-Taubah 9:33.  Shari’ah declares
non-Arabs to be unsuitable marriage partners for Muslimas “because “Allah has chosen the Arabs above others“.
Get a clue.

security specialists reject racial profiling

Is Islam a race? Allah has enslaved people of all
races, so what race is Islam?  Did race play a role in the acts of
the “shoe bomber” & “underwear bomber”? They are different racially
but both are Muslim. Get a clue.

wrong

What Shrub said is not relevant; he is out of office
and ineligible to run again. Being a fool who said “Islam is a great religion of peace“,
he has no probative authority.  Exactly what is wrong with
scrutinizing Muslims in the airport lines?  Exactly what is wrong
with determining the religious affiliation of persons with Arab &
Asiatic appearance in airport lines?

counterproductive practice

Four of our aircraft were hijacked and deliberately
crashed in ’01; how many Israeli aircraft were hijacked in that
year?  Exactly what is counter productive about profiling?
If a white man robs a bank do you draw black men into a dragnet?
Get a clue.

Prophet Jesus … would fit his ‘profile

The AssWholliness
of that blasphemy is outrageous!  Jesus Christ is not a prophet of
Islam. Which of his teachings do Muslims teach in the mosques and
practice? Jesus Christ did not reveal the obligation of offensive
conquest. Jesus Christ did not reveal the need to exterminate Jews.  Jesus Christ
neither sanctified nor exemplified terrorism.  Jesus Christ is not a genocidal warlord.

Jesus was born to a descendant of King David; His
heritage is Jewish, not Arab. Jesus Christ taught Judaism in the Jewish
Temple, not Islam in a mosque. The place of his birth is Israel, not
Falestine.

reject Islamophobic rhetoric

There is nothing phobic about loathing of Islam
which is well founded in objective factual reality. Islam is perpetual war.  Muslims, motivated
by Allah’s threat & promise,
perpetrated the Hindu, Armenian & Assyrian genocides. Those who
perpetrated recent atrocities in New York, London & Beslan
shouted  “Allahu Akbar”, not “Jesus is Lord”. Get a clue.

I swear that I will not vote for any candidate who
lifts Allah’s tail and inserts his tongue by accepting CAIR’s
outrageous demand.

profiling is unconstitutional

Prove it. Show us the constitutional provision which
explicitly forbids it.

diverts precious law enforcement resources

Resources are wasted by searching, scanning and
harassing kuffar children and their grandmothers. Resources are wasted
by random searches. Resources are wasted by not excluding Muslims from
mass transit so that the whole TSA program could be scrapped.

linked to terrorist activity

I will
cast terror
.”.  “Allah
cast terror…
“. “…That is because they suffer neither thirst nor
fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any step to raise
the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy
but
is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness….”. “I have been made victorious with terror“.
“…Then do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest?
Then what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except
disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they
shall be consigned to the most grievous torment….” Islam is terrorist
activity; Muslims are linked to it by Allah’s yoke of slavery.

Santorum called “Sharia,” or Islamic principles, “evil”

Santorum spoke the truth. Examine the evidence;
see for yourself.  Shari’ah imposes cruel & unusual
punishment. Shari’ah mandates annual military attacks against
disbelievers. Shari’ah declares that the caliph makes war upon Jews,
Christians and Zoroastrians. Shari’ah denies religious freedom,
equality and dignity.

November 24, 2011 Posted by | CAIR, GWB, GWOT, Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Political Correctness, Politics | , , , | 1 Comment

Iowa Debate: No Guts, No Glory


I missed the debate Saturday night. Monday night I found it on the web, and share the link with you. The program, which began with some introductory speeches and ceremony, runs 178 minutes of which the “debate” takes two hours.

This debate differs from the others because the questioners expressed and exercised respect for the candidates and avoided “gotcha” questions.  Civility prevailed.

There was plenty of emotion in this debate, and a great deal of deliberateness.  While issues of morality, marriage, abortion, education and health care took up most of the time, I am most interested in the final subject of the night, which begins at 158:36.

What follows is strictly an amateurish attempt at transcription.  I type very slowly, and my memory is not the best. I take in a few words, pause the video and type what I have heard before restarting the video. Due to system lag, I lose some audio in the process.   My transcription  is not perfect, but it should be good enough to give you a good idea of what transpired in the last round of answers.

The final question: “Every one of you talked about the importance of preserving life.  Nothing takes life more than the declaration of war. I would like to hear from you, because nothing frightens a mother more, than watching her son or daughter go off …Their pride in their country and their fear for their child…what is–can you define the moral justification for war? …Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria –what is the moral justification? ”

  • Rep. Paul:  The early church struggled with this, I mean, Christ came  and Christ taught about peace and Christ was to be the prince of peace and we were to defend that.  But early on in the church, struggled with this and St. Augustine came up with the principles of the just war.  I believe in and I think we should follow, from the religious viewpoint, that we have a Constitution that is very clear to guide us to try to prevent these wars and that is that we don’t go to war without a declaration .  The wars that we have fought since World War2 were all . illegal, unconstitutional and all were un-winnable and it was tragic– it was tragic, we did it by failing the rule of law and the tragedy let out of these wars the last ten years, that we have been so … added ten billion dollars to our national debt, …Americans have been killed in these wars, 44 thousand have come home wounded and crippled, hundreds of thousands are looking for help and we went to blind ourselves to this.  It is not in our national defense, it is mischief, it is getting involved where we don’t need to be involved.  I think it is an utter tragedy in  what is happening.  You wanna talk about a family life –there has to have been somebody in this audience who has been the bearer of news, either a loved one lost or a loved one crippled.  It is on and on  I had one soldier come to me the other day and he was so against the wars, he spent three or four tours over there, that he says “I lost too many buddies and I don’d know why we were there. ” And theres no signs of progress over there.  He says “now I’m losing my buddies to suicide.”  The wars destroy the family, I’m the …as does the economic climate– the bad economics  — war is the most destructive things to the family and we oughtta concentrate on it and you can’t concentrate on the economics unless we look at the business cycle, why we have inflation busts and booms  otherwise we will continue on a downhill path.
  • Rep. Bachmann I am a mother and I have made  the most difficult calls of my live which has been when servicemen and women have lost their lives in my  congressional district and I have picked up that phone and I’ve called mothers and I’ve called fathers and I have wept with them over the phone because nothing is more difficult to lose than a child.  [Luntz: “So what is the definition–the moral justification for war?”]  The moral justification for war is if the United States is attacked or we are  threatened with attack, then we have a decision that we have to make because the number one duty of the commander in chief is to secure the safety of the American people, that is the duty, and in order to do that, I have to be convinced as commander in chief that we have a clearly defined American vital interest in that area and I need to know that we have a clear mission to go forward. … have a plan and an exit strategy and we go in, I will commit overwhelming force and then we get out. Now some situations are ones where you can have special operations forces and then you have to have the tools to be able to deal with interrogation, which we don’t have now under Obama.  You have to have the capacity for detention, which we don’t have now under President Obama.   But we have to have a clearly defined interest and I think we also have to take advice from George Washington, who told us, rightly so, I’m not an isolationist,  but he said very carefully be very fearful of unnecessary foreign entanglements and if there is anything we have learned from the last twelve years, once you get in, its very difficult to get out.  So you go in wisely.
  • Cain: In the declaration where it says “endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights”,  and then it delineates three of them: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  It says that among these are those three, I happen to think that there is another that is implied: the right to protect yourself, your family and to protect your property. So the defense of freedom and the defense of liberty I believe, is the moral justification for going to war. Secondly, as commander in chief, I will not send our young men and women into war unless it is clear why –the mission and the definition of victory… And thirdly, I would not send them into war unless I would send my own and daughter.
  • Gov. Perry: As a former individual who has worn the uniform of his country, as the commander in chief of over twenty thousand troops that are my command today,in the state of Texas with our Guard, I’ve been dealing with this issue for ten years.  And clearly, when America’s interests are in jeopardy, there is a time and a place for us to intervene and intervene militarily.  But when we intervene militarily, we best make the decision of how we are going to win and how we are going to win convincingly and quickly.  Send those young men and women with the equipment to win.  Don’t let some congressman sitting in an air conditioned office  in Washington DC decide what the rules of engagement are.  Let those war fighters win the war.  Let them come home victorious.  That is what the American military man and woman is all about.  And for us to micromanage them in a civilian way without their commanders truly being in charge, is absolutely irresponsible and as commander in chief of this country I will not let it happen.
  • Santorum: Let me maybe try to drill it down to a more practical application.  We are engaged in what many people call the long war.  Americans are known to have a rather short attention span.  As we are a young country, an antique for us is a hundred years old. In the Middle East its two thousand years old. They have a very  different view of time and history.  As a result, when we are engaged in this long war, long to us is not the same as long to them.  What we are facing right now is a, again, read our history– is a thousand year conflict between radical Islam and the West that ended only because of the West’s great technical superiority that was able to defeat them and drive them back and eventually colonize the Middle East. But that changed with one three letter word: oil.  .  Oil allowed the radical elements within the Islamic world to be able to get access to technology, and now we have in the case of Iran, to drill it down even more, a radical theocracy that has been at war with us since 1979.  It has done more to kill our troops in Iraq and in Afghanistan because they are the makers of the IEDs that are killing our troops.  They’ve attacked this country on repeated occasions from the Khobar Towers to …their proxies in Beirut.  They’ve attempted the assassination of an Ambassador.  They have threatened  openly and repeatedly our closest allies.  They hold conventions in Tehran denyiug the Holocaust– in fact most of the aea of the Middle East  now believes that the Holocaust didn’t really occur so there is no justification for the state of Israel.  They are now developing a nuclear weapon. It is now apparent that they are doing so; international agencies, not necessarily the boldest group of folks have suggested that that is the case.  We have a moral obligation to partner with the state of Israel to make … to assure their survival and to make sure that this radical regime that wants to spread its virulent form of radical Islam not just throughout the Middle East but throughout the world is stopped from having the ability to do so with impunity because that’s the thing a nuclear weapon does, it gives you a nuclear shield.  It must be stopped.  I laid out a plan the other day and I know we are short of time that lists four major things that we should be doing: covert activities, sanctions, overturning the regime but also working with Israel right now to plan a military option to strike and destroy these facilities.  And let the Iranians know, that unless they open up their facilities [to inspection] and shut them down, that that is an option that will be used period.
  • Gingrich: First of all In Christian theology, there is a clear development of a concept of just war. which people like Augustine developed because they were seeing the rise of pagans that wee actually threatening the very survival of the country. In fact, Augustine is buried in Italy because hes body was taken out of North Africa when the Christians lost North Africa.  So these things become very real.  My Dad spent twenty seven years in the Army, I watched my mother through that whole period in WW2, Korea and Vietnam.  . I think what makes us different and what makes us in some ways… much more ruthless and much tougher … is we don’t send soldiers and sailors and marines and airmen to war, we send our children, we send our fathers, we send our brothers and sisters; we send our mothers and therefore there is a preciousness to this decision unlike any other country that I know.  I think our position historically …the Declaration of Independence was signed by people who were going to fight an eight year war. It was  a declaration of war in effect.  Washington was in the field eight years with one week at Mount Vernon.  These people who wrote those documents understood the grim reality.  I believe we should not go to war if we can avoid it.  And when we have to go to war we should do so decisively,  with overwhelming power to seek the quickest possible victory and we should in fact be prepared to do whatever it takes to win  when we begin an engagement.  But I think that there is no question …this is the only place where I disagree with some of my friends– you come into our country and you kill 3100 people and we will do whatever it takes to eliminate your capacity to threaten us ever again and I would be tougher and more decisive and I agree entirely with Senator Santorum–I would say to the government of Iran today: we have a very short time to solve … and you should solve it on your own or we will solve it for you and frankly, we couldn’t care less what the rest of the world thinks ; we’re gonna get it done.

In my view, Frank Luntz  probed the candidates for their views  on the morality of our invasions of Afghanistan & Iraq and our intervention in  Libya.  The answers seem to center on just war theory in general and how to bring war to a good end.

Congressman Paul mixed just enough truth into his spiel to make it attractive to the middle range of Morons.  Its a good thing that I was not in the audience, because I would have violated the decorum of the debate by booing.  The fact that wars should be declared, for good cause and with clearly stated objectives should go without saying, it is simply too obvious.  The jerk elevates my blood pressure too much.

As I was listening, Congresswoman Bachmann sounded good. As I review the transcript, I get a sense of disappointment.  When America is threatened or attack, the vital national interest is clear on the face of the matter, no divination is required.  Victory is the exit strategy.  Commitment o overwhelming force is the part I liked, lacking in Afghanistan & Iraq, along with a  sane definition of strategic objectives.

Cain made the right points about cause, clarity and mission definition.  I though his answer was brief and sensible, with just the right amount of emotion, somewhat overstated. I would have omitted the part about sending my own offspring, which would have fitted better if we still had an army of conscripts.

Gov. Perry spoke with passion and conviction, with slightly clumsy rhetoric initially.  If he brought up the issue of defining victory, I overlooked it.  Since Vietnam, the micromanagement seems to me to be Presidential, not Congressional.  President Obama instituted the suicidal rules of engagement from which our troops are currently suffering.

I wish that Santorum would drop the R word; it does not belong in discussions of national security issues.  As the wise man said “Its Islam, stupid!”.  I think that he knows it, and is pandering to the politically correct crowd.  Of course he is correct about the need to support Israel and prevent Iran’s nuclear ascension.

Like Santorum, Gingrich brought in the theological and emotional elements, adding his own historian’s perspective. The good part comes at the end when he said “whatever it takes”.

We got into this bind because, when I was too young to realize what was transpiring, we were terrified of the prospect of nuclear war with Russia & China. We therefore fought a half-assed war in Korea,  unwilling either to suffer an outright loss or exert sufficient force to win.

In Vietnam, we got in, sank in the quagmire, and escalated, once again unwilling to risk all out conflict with Ho Chi Minh’s powerful patrons.  In the end, we allowed the media to defeat us with propaganda.

President Carter began digging our grave when he gave Iran to Khomeini. His dithering while our Embassy staff sat in durance vile and his quarter-assed rescue attempt, which cost more lives,  let the enemy smell blood.

I voted for President Reagan once at least, probably twice, but memory has faded and there is a strong chance that I wrote in Jesus Christ in ’84. The Beirut fiasco caused me to demand that my Congressman introduce articles of impeachment.  In my opinion, nothing contributed more to our present situation than
Reagan’s suicidal blunder.

Sending the Marines to save Arafat’s bacon was a blunder of momentous proportions.  Arafat was an enemy and his defeat was in our short and long term national interest.  Allowing the Beirut Massacre to go unpunished signaled weakness to the enemy, a fatal error.

President Clinton dug the grave deeper and wider by affording impunity to Iran in the Khobar Towers bombing & other incidents, Mogadishu not being the least of them. Sending the Marines without the equipment they needed was a bad idea.

Shrub installed the vault and set up the straps to lower the coffin by failing to recognize and declare that which, with the benefit of hindsight, the debate participants hinted at but failed to openly express.

In view of the antagonistic media, which defeated us in Vietnam, world public opinion and the UN allied with the media and our own diminished patience for long wars, common sense dictated the use of such overwhelming force that the war would be over in a few days.  Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq & Pakistan should have disappeared from the globe in a flash of fire.  Disproportionate, overwhelming, terrifying force, signifying exhausted patience and the will to win, immediately and finally was required.

Victory is defined, in this conflict, as the extinction of Islam in the nations where the plot was conceived, assisted, expedited & celebrated.  So long as the populations of Afghanistan Iran & Pakistan are alive and Islamic, they will provoke, incite, promote and perpetuate terrorism. No other outcome is possible because of Allah’s promise and threat. Go to war; go to Paradise or go to Hell.  For extra credit, injure or enrage the enemy and get more “virgins” & wine. If you doubt this, obtain a clue from Allah’s perfected, immutable word: 8:12, 39,  57, 60 , 65, 9:5,29, 38, 39, 111, 120, 123, 33:26, 27, 59:2, 13, 61:10-12 & Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220 from whence issue war & terror.  If they believe, they will terrorize to avoid Hell and gain admission to Allah’s celestial bordello.

Truth is not hate speech. Advocacy of effective national defense is not warmongering neither is it inciting violence.  Terrorism is not the enemy, it is a tactic. Al-Qaeda is not the enemy, it is a branch of al-Ikhwan al-Muslimeen.  Al-Ikhwan al-Muslimeen is not the enemy, it is a branch of Islam.  Islam is the enemy. This is a fatal fact which the candidates for the Republican nomination seem to lack the courage to clearly state.

The strategic objective is permanently terminating Islamic terrorism against the U.S.A.  Only exterminating Islam can achieve that objective. While there is Islam, there is war.  If we eliminate Islam in those nations most directly involved, we can temporarily intimidate the remainder so that they will delay the resumption of attacks.  That would buy us some time for the vital task of inducing mass apostasy among the remainder.

So long as Afghanistan & Pakistan are populated by Muslims, they will host terrorist training camps and export terrorism.  Installing democracy does nothing to change that. Partially defeating the Taliban and al-Qaeda does nothing to change that.  Victory requires their apostasy from Islam or death. No other option exists.  They are not liberated if they are still Muslims; they remain enslaved to the demon who demands “great slaughter”.

November 22, 2011 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, Politics | , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

%d bloggers like this: