Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Former Radical Islamist: “I Know Their Thinking.”

  Although I’m not completely won over by Hassan Butt,  he does make some good points here about the real roots of Islamic terror.



I was a fanatic…I know their thinking, says former radical Islamist

By HASSAN BUTT – More by this author »

hassan butt

When I was still a member of what is probably best termed the British Jihadi Network – a series of British Muslim terrorist groups linked by a single ideology – I remember how we used to laugh in celebration whenever people on TV proclaimed that the sole cause for Islamic acts of terror like 9/11, the Madrid bombings and 7/7 was Western foreign policy.By blaming the Government for our actions, those who pushed this “Blair’s bombs” line did our propaganda work for us.

Read more…           

Two doctors held over bomb attacks

Summer of chaos ahead as airports step up terror shield

More important, they also helped to draw away any critical examination from the real engine of our violence: Islamic theology.

The attempts to cause mass destruction in London and Glasgow are so reminiscent of other recent British Islamic extremist plots that they are likely to have been carried out by my former peers.

And as with previous terror attacks, people are again saying that violence carried out by Muslims is all to do with foreign policy.

For example, on Saturday on Radio 4’s Today programme, the Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, said: “What all our intelligence shows about the opinions of disaffected young Muslims is the main driving force is not Afghanistan, it is mainly Iraq.”

I left the British Jihadi Network in February 2006 because I realised that its members had simply become mindless killers. But if I were still fighting for their cause, I’d be laughing once again.

Mohammed Sidique Khan Mohammed Sidique Khan met with the author on two separate occasions

Mohammad Sidique Khan, the leader of the July 7 bombings, and I were both part of the network – I met him on two occasions.

And though many British extremists are angered by the deaths of fellow Muslim across the world, what drove me and many others to plot acts of extreme terror within Britain and abroad was a sense that we were fighting for the creation of a revolutionary worldwide Islamic state that would dispense Islamic justice.

If we were interested in justice, you may ask, how did this continuing violence come to be the means of promoting such a (flawed) Utopian goal?

How do Islamic radicals justify such terror in the name of their religion?

There isn’t enough room to outline everything here, but the foundation of extremist reasoning rests upon a model of the world in which you are either a believer or an infidel.

Formal Islamic theology, unlike Christian theology, does not allow for the separation of state and religion: they are considered to be one and the same.

For centuries, the reasoning of Islamic jurists has set down rules of interaction between Dar ul-Islam (the Land of Islam) and Dar ul-Kufr (the Land of Unbelief) to cover almost every matter of trade, peace and war.

But what radicals and extremists do is to take this two steps further. Their first step has been to argue that, since there is no pure Islamic state, the whole world must be Dar ul-Kufr (The Land of Unbelief).

Step two: since Islam must declare war on unbelief, they have declared war upon the whole world.

Along with many of my former peers, I was taught by Pakistani and British radical preachers that this reclassification of the globe as a Land of War (Dar ul-Harb) allows any Muslim to destroy the sanctity of the five rights that every human is granted under Islam: life, wealth, land, mind and belief.

In Dar ul-Harb, anything goes, including the treachery and cowardice of attacking civilians.

The notion of a global battlefield has been a source of friction for Muslims living in Britain.

For decades, radicals have been exploiting the tensions between Islamic theology and the modern secular state – typically by starting debate with the question: “Are you British or Muslim?”

But the main reason why radicals have managed to increase their following is because most Muslim institutions in Britain just don’t want to talk about theology.

They refuse to broach the difficult and often complex truth that Islam can be interpreted as condoning violence against the unbeliever – and instead repeat the mantra that Islam is peace and hope that all of this debate will go away.

This has left the territory open for radicals to claim as their own. I should know because, as a former extremist recruiter, I repeatedly came across those who had tried to raise these issues with mosque authorities only to be banned from their grounds.

Every time this happened it felt like a moral and religious victory for us because it served as a recruiting sergeant for extremism.

Outside Britain, there are those who try to reverse this two-step revisionism.

A handful of scholars from the Middle East have tried to put radicalism back in the box by saying that the rules of war devised so long ago by Islamic jurists were always conceived with the existence of an Islamic state in mind, a state which would supposedly regulate jihad in a responsible Islamic fashion.

In other words, individual Muslims don’t have the authority to go around declaring global war in the name of Islam.

But there is a more fundamental reasoning that has struck me as a far more potent argument because it involves recognising the reality of the world: Muslims don’t actually live in the bipolar world of the Middle Ages any more.

The fact is that Muslims in Britain are citizens of this country. We are no longer migrants in a Land of Unbelief.

For my generation, we were born here, raised here, schooled here, we work here and we’ll stay here.

But more than that, on a historically unprecedented scale, Muslims in Britain have been allowed to assert their religious identity through clothing, the construction of mosques, the building of cemeteries and equal rights in law.

However, it isn’t enough for responsible Muslims to say that, because they feel at home in Britain, they can simply ignore those passages of the Koran which instruct on killing unbelievers.

Because so many in the Muslim community refuse to challenge centuries-old theological arguments, the tensions between Islamic theology and the modern world grow larger every day.

I believe that the issue of terrorism can be easily demystified if Muslims and non-Muslims start openly to discuss the ideas that fuel terrorism.

Crucially, the Muslim community in Britain must slap itself awake from its state of denial and realise there is no shame in admitting the extremism within our families, communities and worldwide co-religionists.

If our country is going to take on radicals and violent extremists, Muslim scholars must go back to the books and come forward with a refashioned set of rules and a revised understanding of the rights and responsibilities of Muslims whose homes and souls are firmly planted in what I’d like to term the Land of Co-existence.

And when this new theological territory is opened up, Western Muslims will be able to liberate themselves from defunct models of the world, rewrite the rules of interaction and perhaps we will discover that the concept of killing in the name of Islam is no more than an anachronism.

July 5, 2007 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Faces of Islam


Rage Boy.

Would you let this man date your daughter?





This is Ismail Haniyeh, the leader of the Hamas terror group, which the Palestinians have chosen to run their government.  He wants your money…  unconditionally.

These are his people, the Hamas terrorists who have slaughtered hundreds of innocent people in shopping malls, cafes and even on buses.  (They’re holding Qur’ans).

This is an example of who they murder: Mazal Marciano a talented and devoted mother of two small children.  She made easy pickings for Haniyeh and his henchmen.


 Algeria terrorist attack, April 11, 2007.


“Raise your hand if you doubt Islam is the religion of peace.”     



     They not only want your money, they want your children too. 



Brought to you by, “The Appeasers”.  

Feel better?  Can we all hold hands and sing kumbaya and “Give Peace a Chance?” 

Isn’t this wonderful? Look at those smiling faces .



Sponsored by Air Islam  and The Flying Imams. “Our aim please. We always arrive on time and unexpectedly.”


Have a nice day………                                                                                                                                           



June 30, 2007 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Pandering to Islam.

‘Dhimmification’ on the march

Diana West
June 29, 2007

If anyone wants to know why Muslims the world over tell pollsters the United States is at war with Islam, just read President Bush’s speech at the Islamic Center of Washington, especially the part about American-style religious freedom — in the president’s words, “what we wish for the world.”

He began this way: “For those who seek a true understanding of our country, they need look no farther than here.”

No, not the mosque itself, but down the street it occupies. “This Muslim center sits quietly down the road from a synagogue, a Lutheran Church, a Catholic parish, a Greek Orthodox chapel, a Buddhist temple — each with faithful followers who practice their deeply held beliefs and live side by side in peace,” the president explained, standing in his Islamically observant stocking feet before a cool Muslim audience. “This is what freedom offers: societies where people can live and worship as they choose without intimidation, without suspicion, without a knock on the door from the secret police.”

As one who has attended a Bar Mitzvah at that synagogue down the road, I have news for the president: Freedom, American-style, has changed. To enter, I passed an armed guard holding an automatic weapon manning the door. Armed guards like him man many such doors in many such cities. In fact, so common is it for religious worship (mainly, but not exclusively, Jewish worship) to require armed protection today that we miss the implications: the degree to which freedom to worship without fear in America has been curtailed by the open-ended threat of Buddhist violence.

Whoops, sorry. I mean, curtailed by the open-ended threat of Greek Orthodox violence. Or was that Catholic Lutheran violence?

No, the peril to the synagogue was, and remains, Islamic violence. The resulting diminution of freedom is a symptom of advancing dhimmitude — the diminished cultural condition of non-Muslims living in relation to Islam.

So, freedom of worship ain’t what it used to be. But even in its terror-constrained state, the spread of American religious freedom actually threatens religiously unfree Islamic cultures, which, for example, consider “apostasy” — deciding not to be Muslim — a capital crime.

But that threat is only on paper. Where Americans actually become involved in the Islamic world, Shariah (Islamic law) is protected, enshrined even, as shockingly attested by Shariah’s primacy in the American-fostered constitutions of Iraq, Afghanistan and the Palestinian Authority. The president doesn’t seem to understand that. I don’t think he even understands Shariah, under which the primacy of Islam is absolute, and other religions are “tolerated,” at best, at the high cost of dhimmitude. Nearly six years after September 11 — nearly six years after first visiting the Islamic Center and proclaiming “Islam is peace” — Mr. Bush has learned nothing.

Read the rest here.

June 30, 2007 Posted by | Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Bus Bombers Seek Israeli Protection From Head-Choppers

By Andrew Walden | June 26, 2007 Apparently there are worse things than “occupation.” After fighting erupted with their fellow Palestinian group Hamas, Gaza fighters for the Fatah faction of the PLO went running for protection to the Israeli border. They are among about 600 Gazans stuck at the Erez Crossing from northern Gaza into Israel.  Only those with VIP status were being allowed to cross into Israel. The rank and file are stuck without food, water, or toilets waiting since June 16 or 17 in the crossing’s long concrete corridor while Israeli courts and human rights activists exercise themselves over their enemies’ fate. 

Reality has a way of forcing the truth out into the open. After decades of terrorist war against Israel, Gazans know they are better off begging Israel for admission rather than facing the reality of Iranian-backed Hamas’ Islamist rule. About 700 meters behind them is a hastily-built Hamas checkpoint, where Hamas terrorists—now ruling over Gaza—wave away late-comers and await any Fatah terrorists who give up hope. On June 20, Israeli tanks moved to positions at the Gaza end of the corridor to forestall any Hamas bloodbath.    

In May and June, Gaza Fatah leader Muhammad Dahlan—once touted as the tough PLO security chief who could hold up the PLO’s end of the 1993 Oslo bargain and keep the Islamists in check—was conveniently in Egypt for medical treatment (of his knees, no less). Other Fatah leaders, who had no problem ordering teenagers and women to blow themselves up, had second thoughts when it came to achieving “martyrdom” themselves. They headed out of Gaza in the weeks or days before the final five days of combat. 

As the fighting headed for a showdown, lower level Fatah operatives found themselves abandoned by their own leaders. Between June 11-16, Fatah resistance collapsed. Hamas terrorists found themselves controlling Fatah’s torture chambers and other Gaza government installations. Dozens of surrendering Fatah fighters were reportedly executed by Hamas. Hamas terrorists rummaged through PLO offices and the homes of Dahlan and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. They claim to have found many records which could be embarrassing to Fatah. In an ironic final act of the disaster spawned by the misnamed Oslo peace process, Hamas terrorists even swiped Yasser Arafat’s Nobel Peace prize medallion from his luxurious seaside villa.

The Jerusalem Post of June 24 reports that Hamas did not expect or plan to win in Gaza against the numerically and technically superior Fatah forces.  

(Hamas spokesman Ayman) Taha claimed that Hamas and Fatah were on the verge of signing a cease-fire agreement with the Fatah leadership, which chose to order its men to either surrender or abandon their bases.

“…(PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas) issued instructions to his security forces to retreat and hand over their bases to Hamas.”

Taha also revealed that on the eve of the ostensible cease-fire, Abbas phoned Syria-based Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal and informed him that Fatah was going to surrender and hand over the Gaza Strip to Hamas.


With Hamas out of the PA government, the cabinet of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert agreed Sunday June 24 to re-open the cash spigot of PA taxes collected by Israel.  Israel has withheld transfer of $550 million in PA taxes collected since Hamas won the January 2006 PA elections.

Gaza wasn’t always like this. Back in what now must seem like the halcyon days of Israeli “occupation,” tens of thousands of Gazans held jobs in Israel. Thousands more worked within Gaza in Israeli-owned factories. Violence was far less than it has been in recent years or months. But a weakening of Israeli resistance to Islamic fascism was shown during the first “Intifada” leading to the 1993 Oslo Peace talks. Muslims, sensing opportunity, formed new factions to contest for power. The fighting gradually escalated, wearing Gaza down into what is now a seaside Hell dependent entirely on outside charity for food, and now for fuel.

Storage tanks ran dry almost immediately as gasoline supplies were cut off when Hamas took power June 16. According to the International Herald Tribune: “Asef Hamdi, a worker at a Gaza gas station, feared what the end of the fuel shipments would mean a return to the stone age. ‘The results will be Gaza in full darkness, with no cars,’ he said. ‘In simple words…welcome to the Taliban lifestyle,’ a reference to Afghanistan under fundamentalist Islamic rule.”


Hamdi is not the only one to sense the coming nightmare. In a message to Gazans,  on June 17 Islamists tore down Gaza City’s “Unknown Soldier” statue. Representations of people are forbidden under Islam. Although the rule is not particularly important—millions of Muslims violate it every day—the display of enforcing it is very significant. After doing what they do best—cutting off its head—the Islamists dumped the rest of the statue in Gaza City’s Palestine Square—a major bus transfer point where thousands of people are likely to see it. Abu Mohammed, a park worker told IHT: “Even in Iran, they have statues.”


Hamas does not get Fatah’s money, but it does get them 1.5 million people, including many children, to continue brainwashing into future homicide bombers. The separation may also clear the way for Hamas to receive more assistance from its masters in Iran and Syria. 


The Fatah-Hamas deal expands Shia power. With the defeat of the USSR in Afghanistan and the weak pre-9/11 responses by America to Islamist terror attacks, more Muslims are coming to believe that the time to take power is now. This increases the urgency of the Shia-Sunni battle. As Iran builds nukes, Iranian backed groups are warring for power in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Lebanon and Sudan as well as in the PA.


Deeply concerned about the Shia threat, Egypt and Jordan are meeting with Abbas and Olmert to bolster the PA. Commenting on the summit, AP reports “Ismail Haniyeh, the deposed Palestinian prime minister, dismissed the summit as a ‘mirage,’ saying resistance was the only hope for Palestinians.” Haniyeh is not far off.  Fatah is a mirage. As Israel and the West give it more financial support it will become weaker and its leaders more corrupt. When the Fatah mirage finally evaporates, Islamists will control all of the PA territories and will have all of the Israeli and western finances not stolen by Fatah leaders. This is precisely what has happened in Gaza.       


Those jamming the Erez crossing are not the only Gazans trying to escape the logic of their religion.  Another 5000 Gazans jam the closed Rafah crossing into Egypt. According to an Associated Press article by Sarah al Deeb in Gaza and Karin Laub in Ramallah, “A Fatah leader in the West Bank, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the delicacy of the matter, said Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas was not interested in having Gazans stream out of the coastal strip and leave it an undilu ted Hamas stronghold.” Hamas is also working to keep its slaves; gunmen have reportedly been deployed along the Gaza-Egypt border, just as they are at Erez. Assisting in population control, the Fatah-controlled PA Has voided all Gaza-issued PA Passports.   


In what is likely a ploy to appeal to soft-headed American Democrats, Hamas’ ousted PA Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh has allegedly ordered the release of BBC reporter, Alan Johnston, held in Gaza since March 12 by a shadowy Islamist terror group. But according to Hamas spokesperson Fawzi Barhoum orders from Fatah are keeping him captive in an effort to block a Hamas’ publicity coup.    


PA President Mahmoud Abbas condemns the Hamas head-choppers as “coup-plotters” and “murderous terrorists.” Fatah terrorists beg for Israeli protection after being abandoned by their leaders. But Hamas is finding some friends in the Democrat Party and its media. Safety fears may have kept Western journalists from operating in Gaza since the abduction Johnson, but that hasn’t stopped the New York Times and the Washington Post from serving as Hamas mouthpieces, printing a carefully crafted June 21 statement appealing for support from U.S. liberals and leftists.


Failed ex-President Jimmy Carter and Democrat presidential wannabe Dennis Kucinich have answered Hamas’ call. They agree that the Hamas takeover is connected to the cut-off of funding to the PA. In response they have joined calls by Hawaii Rep. Neil Abercrombie for American funding of Islamist terror.


The scene at Erez Crossing should put on full display the reality Carter, Kucinich, Abercrombie, the Times, and the Post are unwilling to face. Even Fatah terrorists know Hamas is nothing but a gang of murderous thugs. Western leftists who work themselves into rhetorical pretzels on Hamas’ behalf are fools.

June 27, 2007 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What Really Happened In The Middle East.

From the: Terrorist Awareness Project

Also posted at; Dhimmitude News Network

While reading over at Planck’s Constant, Bernie, one of DNN’s most accomplished author’s – I found this to be one of the most compelling and interesting articles put out by David Horowitz is asking bloggers to spread the word about a new video from the Terrorism Awareness Project. Click on the below image to watch this most insightful and truth telling video. It will most certainly open your eyes.


What Really Happened in the Middle East

It is an urgent matter to counteract the hatred and lies of radical Islam. Their lies are a formidable weapon in their jihad to defeat the West and to impose Islam across the globe. Their lies are used to justify their killing of innocent men, women and children, and their drive to take over country after country, to radicalize moderate Muslims, and to impose Sharia (Muslim) law on people everywhere.


They lie about America. But most of all they lie about Israel, telling the world that Israel is the aggressor in the Middle East, and especially that their grievances would end if Israel didn’t exist.


Most Americans know that when Osama bin Laden says America is making war on Islam he is lying. When radical Islamists say that 9/11 was our fault, most Americans know they are lying.


But when they say that Israel stole land from the Palestinians . . . that Israel routinely brutalizes Palestinian civilians…that Israel initiates aggression against its neighbors – many Americans do not know they are lying.


An astonishing number of academics believe their lies. Israel-hating is so common at colleges and universities that it is taken for granted. On some campuses Muslim student groups host virulently anti-Israel and anti-Semitic speakers, disrupt Jewish and pro-Israel activities, and even physically intimidate Jewish students, without a peep from the administration.


Bernie writes:

In order to get the truth about Israel out to millions of Americans to counteract the lies of the radical Islamists, David asks everyone to email the What Really Happened in the Middle East video to everyone in your email list, and if you are a blogger, to place the link on your web site.

He is also asking for contributions to help publicize it though his speeches and interviews. He will focus on reaching college students, the media and decision-makers at every level.

If you want to help, please follow this secure link to donate to this campaign.

June 24, 2007 Posted by | Terrorist Awareness Project | Leave a comment

The Truth Matters. Part 5

Arafat’s Children
Gaza’s mayhem is the bitter fruit of terror as statecraft.

Scores of Palestinians were killed this week in Gaza in factional fighting between loyalists of President Mahmoud Abbas of Fatah and those of Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh of Hamas. As if on cue, it took about 24 hours before pundits the world over blamed the violence on Israel and President Bush.This is the Israel that dismantled its settlements in Gaza in August 2005, a unilateral concession for which it asked, and got, nothing in return. And it is the U.S. President who, in a landmark speech five years ago this month, called on Palestinians to “elect new leaders, leaders not compromised by terror.” Had Palestinians done so, they could be living today in a peaceful, independent state. Instead, in January 2006 they freely handed the reins of government to Hamas in parliamentary elections. What is happening today is the result of that choice–their choice.That election didn’t simply emerge from a vacuum, however. It is a consequence of the cult of violence that has typified the Palestinian movement for much of its history and which has been tolerated and often celebrated by the international community. If Palestinians now think they can advance their domestic interests by violence, nobody should be surprised: The way of the gun has been paying dividends for 40 years.

In 1972 Palestinian terrorists murdered Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics. Yet only two years later Yasser Arafat addressed the U.N.’s General Assembly–the first non-government official so honored. In 1970 Arafat attempted to overthrow Jordan’s King Hussein and tried to do the same a few years later in Lebanon. Yet in 1980, the European Community, in its Venice Declaration, recognized Arafat’s Palestine Liberation Organization as a legitimate negotiating partner.

In 1973, the National Security Agency recorded Arafat’s telephoned instructions to PLO terrorists to murder Cleo Noel, the U.S. ambassador in Sudan, and his deputy George Curtis Moore. Yet in 1993, Arafat was welcomed in the White House for the signing of the Oslo Accords with Israel. That same year, the British National Criminal Intelligence Service reported that the PLO made its money from “extortion, payoffs, illegal arms-dealing, drug trafficking, money laundering and fraud.” Yet over the next several years, the Palestinian Authority would become the largest single recipient of foreign aid on a per capita basis.

In 1996, after he had formally renounced terrorism in the Oslo Accords, Arafat told a rally in Gaza that “we are committed to all martyrs who died for the cause of Jerusalem starting with Ahmed Musa until the last martyr Yihye Ayyash”–Musa being the first PLO terrorist to be killed in 1965 and Ayyash being the Hamas mastermind of a series of suicide bombings in which scores of Israeli civilians were killed. Yet the Clinton Administration continued to pretend that Arafat was an ally in the fight against Hamas. In 2000, Arafat rejected an Israeli offer of statehood midwifed by President Clinton and instead initiated the bloody intifada that left 1,000 Israelis and 3,000 Palestinians dead.

In 2005, only months after Arafat’s death, Israel dismantled its settlements and withdrew its forces from the Gaza Strip. Palestinians have used the opportunity to intensify their rocket fire at civilian targets within Israel. Last month, Israeli security services arrested two Gazan women, one of them pregnant, who were planning to enter Israel on medical pretexts in order to carry out suicide attacks. Yet the same month, the World Bank issued a report faulting Israel for restricting Palestinian freedom of movement.

Now it appears Hamas has taken control of the Gaza Strip’s main road and its border with Egypt, as well as the offices of the so-called Preventive Security Services, traditionally a Fatah stronghold. “They are executing them one by one,” a witness told the Associated Press of Hamas’s reprisals against the Preventive Security personnel.

We do not pretend to know where all this will lead. On Thursday, Mr. Abbas dissolved the government and declared a state of emergency, though he seems powerless to change the course of events in Gaza. Israel could conceivably intervene, as could Egypt, and both states have powerful reasons to prevent the emergence of a Hamastan with close links to Iran hard on their borders. But neither do they wish to become stuck in the Strip’s bottomless factionalism and fanaticism.

At the same time, pressure will surely mount on Israel and the U.S. to accept Hamas’s ascendancy and begin negotiations with its leaders. According to this reasoning, the Bush Administration cannot demand democracy of the Palestinians and then refuse to recognize the results of a democratic election.

But leave aside the fact that Mr. Bush did not simply call for an election: Is it wise to negotiate with a group that kills its fellow Palestinians almost as freely as it does Israelis? And what would there be to negotiate about? The best-case scenario–a suspension of hostilities in exchange for renewed international funding–would simply give Hamas time and money to consolidate its rule and rebuild an arsenal for future terror assaults. Then, too, the last thing the Palestinians need is yet further validation from the wider world that the violence they now inflict so indiscriminately works.

The deeper lesson here is that a society that has spent the last decade celebrating suicide bombing would inevitably become a victim of its own nihilistic impulses. This is not the result of Mr. Bush’s call for democratic responsibility; it is the bitter fruit of the decades of dictatorship and terrorism as statecraft that Yasser Arafat instilled among Palestinians.

Why does the west continue to believe that peace is possible in the Middle East? Do we not have enough proof that peaceful negotiation with the followers of Islam is pure folly?


Do you love your children? Do you think Islam loves their children as we might perceive? Silly question perhaps to some but indulge me. Behold the children of Palestine. Recruited to die.

What of the so called Palestinians and why are we supporting them when they do not exist? Think about that and then read more here.

Imagine a neighbor that wants you dead and will do anything to bring that about. What would you do? Call the police? Move and give up a home you sacrificed so much for? What if that home had been handed down through countless generations of family and your own people had given their lives and those of their children to keep. And if this home had been given to you by God, would you be so willing to give that up without fighting for it? Why should you have to move? Why would you move??

Consider the plight of the Israeli’s and their unholy neighbors the Palestinians. The world condemns Israel but what of their murderous neighbors? Where is the condemnation? The following link contains pictures that may disturb you so consider yourself warned. With neighbors like these, who needs more enemies?

And what of us? Are you willing to embrace 5th Century barbarians? The same barbarians who have killed millions of people for centuries and have killed thousands of Americans over the last few decades? What about the thousands of Israeli’s who have died? Do you really think we can negotiate with Islam? Perhaps sit around the fireplace in your home and have meaningful conversations with them? Drink tea and sing campfire songs? Get to know them better and understand them?

Think again. Islam wants you, your family, your friends, and your neighbors dead. They don’t care who or what you are.

Consider events over the past few years. Remember September 11 ,2001 and the Twin Towers that are now but a memory. What about the nearly 3,000 who died there and the thousands who are still suffering?

Do you want more of these events that may bring death to millions? What will you do? What are you willing to do to preserve your way of life?

And think about your life as it is right now. Not perfect, certainly there are things we all would like to change or do better. But think for a moment, about the things in your life that you cherish the most. The things that bring you joy and laughter or peace and happiness. Whatever they may be do you agree that we live in a remarkable country? Do you feel fortunate to have liberty and freedom? Do you sometimes take for granted the freedoms that allow us to live in some relative peace and happiness? Of course, all of us do from time to time. Do you care? Do you really?

If watching American Idol or Oprah Winfrey or CBS evening news or any other program on television is more important than spending a few minutes every day educating yourself to the perils we all face then you can stop reading right now. Save yourself the time, this isn’t for you because if you think the above listed tv programs are in fact more important, then you don’t care about your own future or that of America’s. Argue all you like, but you have been presented with an opportunity to find out a truth that the mainstream media will not tell you about. What have you got to lose? A little of your time?

Do you love this country? Or do you believe that America and Israel are at fault for every thing wrong in the world. You decide, afterall we still have the freedom to do just that.

This is an appeal to all citizens of this country, whether you are Democrat, Republican, left wing , right wing, liberal or conservative. It matters not if you are Christian, non-theist or atheist, Buddhist, Catholic, humanist or your church is the great outdoors. If you value your life in America, then read on.

Is America perfect? No. Do we make mistakes? Of course we do. Pick a country who hasn’t and then name one country that allows all the freedoms and liberty we enjoy. Be honest. If you hate this country and want to see it fail then go somewhere else to live, you will have plenty of company. America is not your home.

Consider for a moment that this liberty and the freedoms we enjoy and take for granted were taken away. Could it happen here? There are those that are working towards that end inside and outside our country. They believe in anarchy and replacing our liberty and freedoms with tyranny and oppression. In short they hate you because you have something they don’t. Freedom and liberty.

Imagine simple pleasures like going to a concert, visiting a museum, or a night on the town with your loved one(s) to enjoy a movie and a dinner. Perhaps you like to read or take a stroll in a nearby park. Maybe your idea of pleasure is going to a baseball game and enjoying an ice cold beer with a hot dog smothered in goodies. Perhaps it is watching your children play or your grandchildren.

Whatever it might be, consider what the alternatives would likely be without liberty…without freedom.

Islam on trial: The Prosecution’s Case against Islam.

Take a little time to educate yourself and those you care about. Studies in Islam.

June 23, 2007 Posted by | Jihadists, Studies In Islam, Terrorists | 1 Comment

Islam Needs an Exorcist.

A Statement of Charges!


Max Flack Report

Where am I? I’m not supposed to be running an anti-Jihad website. I’m an old man. I’m supposed to be drinking gallons of coffee, jogging three miles a day and sitting in front of the TV set swearing at the Chicago Cubs—or cursing the computer; one is as irritating as the other. That’s what old men are supposed to do—make themselves as useless as possible, but then those bastards brought down the World Trade Center and everything changed. Well, not for everybody—but for me and Rocco DiPippo and Geraldo Rivera and millions of other Americans. But for some it’s been business as usual—for Rosie O’Donnell and Sean Penn, for the Democratic Party, for most of the Republican Party, for the campus SWINE (Students Woefully Ignorant of Nearly Everything), for the KKKK (Kollegiate Kustodians of all Kultural Knowledge), the radical left college professors like Ward Churchill, Robert Jensen and Nicolas DeGenova that dominate what passes for thought on American campuses, not much has changed. Maybe it’s because stupidity loves company and cowardice craves it even more.

There are 250,000,000 people in this world who believe it is okay to kill innocent men, women and children if it will advance the cause of their religion. That’s a lot of empty heads and 249,999,000 of them are Muslims. Not enough to alarm Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama perhaps but enough to send Jethro running to Uncle Jed for a new calculator. (“Two-hundred-fifty million, Uncle Jed! Two-hundred-fifty million!” “Now calm down, Jethro, calm down.”)

Two-hundred-and-fifty million! That number would terrify Dr. Frankenstein—he created one miserable measly monster; Mohammed has created hundreds of millions of them—Mohammed Atta, Osama bin Laden, Omar Bakri Mohammed, the Ayatollah Khomeini; Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Muqtada al-Sadr, Asan Akbar; Omar Abdel Rahman, a thousand jihadists named Mohammed residing inside one square mile in Pakistan—maybe inside one square block. They abound in New York, in California, in Michigan—in a mosque near you. Islam is a sick religion. It would be obvious if the dervishes would sit still long enough to have their temperatures taken. Franklin Graham said Islam was an evil religion. Many people agree with Graham but do not have the courage to say so. (Look! There lies Theo van Gogh—he disrespected Islam! How long did his movie last? Ten Minutes? Not worth getting killed over!)

Islam needs an exorcist worse than Linda Blair. And what does the Democratic Party have to offer—not William Blatty but Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid! Their recommendation—pull out of Iraq! They have been studying the Jubilation T. Cornpone Diaries. They know all about quagmires. Sure, quagmires, quicksand bogs…the stuff Foggy Bottom is made of. The United States is in a worse position today than it was right after the Second Battle of Bull Run—worse than it was after Pearl Harbor. Jefferson Davis did not want to invade the North. Lincoln could have walked away from the war and it would have been over. Japan wanted one battle with the United States, the one it had just fought—that was it. Neither could have conquered the United States and the same goes for Nazi Germany.In war, the initiative is everything. Pelosi and Reid would give it up. They would give it up for what…for talks…for talks with whom? (Look, Sancho, there’s another moderate Muslim! That’s the second one in 200 years! We’re making progress!) Good luck in finding Waldo.

There is nothing moderate about Islam. To believe in Allah and Mohammed is a Muslim’s highest goal. After that it’s Jihad—not the internal struggle between the id and the super-ego but Holy War, the quickest and surest way to Paradise. Mohammed Atta waged Jihad in the dar al-Harb against the nonbelievers; Salman Rushdie engaged in the other Jihad, the inner struggle. Rushdie lost and was anathematized. Whenever a suicide bomber strikes the moderate Muslim talks about Islam’s other Jihad, his struggle with his inner self. Opie Taylor struggled with his inner self every day. Should I cheat on the test? Should I hide Barney’s bullet? He didn’t turn it into a major life-and-death production. Islam’s inner struggle is nine-tenths nonsense—eyewash for dhimmis willing to be deluded—a way for a Muslim to avoid his complicity in one terrorist act after another. (“I was in Florida on St. Valentine’s Day, Mister Ness”)

Bring Abe Lincoln back to life and set him in the White House and it would be hours—maybe days—before he would realize it wasn’t 1863. (“Mr. President, the neocons want more money for the war.” “Neocons? Oh, you must mean Ben Wade and Zach Chandler.”) (“Senator Clinton to see you about the quagmire, Mr. President.” “The quagmire? It’s the Potomac, Mr. Hay. It always smells like this in the summertime.”) (“Who was that man? Clement Vallandigham?” “No, Mr. President, it was Harry Reid.”) (“And this woman’s group…they want to free the slaves in…Louisiana?” “No, Mr. President, they want to free the women in Iraq.”) There’s something wrong here.

And now a civil war is raging in Palestine. Was there an alternative? Ask Hamas Mouse. Hold a séance with Hanadi Jaradat. Check the Rogues Gallery—Yasser Arafat, Jimmy Carter, the Roadmap to Peace, the PLO, Hamas, the al-Aqsa Brigade, Islamic Jihad, intifadas, the right of return, Mad-Rats-Asses schools with textbooks that say: “There is no alternative to destroying Israel.” It’s a veritable devil’s playground—the Middle East. And lurking underneath this Hades on Earth is a crime so shocking in its magnitude it would have left Joseph Goebbels, Baldur von Schirach and the Hitler Youth gasping for breath—the systematic poisoning of the minds of generations of Palestinian children.

And the wonderful thing about all this—the war in Iraq, the horrors in Palestine, and the war on terror—is that it’s George W. Bush’s fault. Go ahead—ask Howard Dean…ask Dennis Kucinich. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) hasn’t accused George W. Bush of this, but the Democratic Party has. What a movie this will make in the 25th Century—Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Bush.

Had enough? Okay? Let’s put the blame where it belongs—on Islam. It wasn’t Osama bin Laden who brought down the World Trade Center and it wasn’t Mohammed Atta or the creepy slugs preaching hatred in a thousand mosques across the world—it was ISLAM! Words on paper can mean a lot. The Qur’an and Islam’s problems predated the birth of Thomas Jefferson by a thousand years. Old Jeff might have sent Stephen Decatur to Tripoli but he wasn’t responsible for the Crusades or Islam’s inability to come to grips with the modern world. It was Mohammed that drove the Jews out of Palestine.

The differences between Islam and Christianity are too numerous and too horrifying to dwell upon for any length of time but there is one difference that one should not forget—now pay attention, Howard Dean—Jesus Christ died for our sins; Mohammed has made millions of people die for his. Islam cannot be forgiven for what it did to the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.

June 22, 2007 Posted by | Jihadists, Studies In Islam, Terrorists | 19 Comments

The Truth Matters. Part 4

Foreword: Some readers may be seeing this for the first time and are surprised and shocked, while others may not be surprised but are shocked. And still others, like a few of us, knew this already and are neither surprised or shocked. Somehow “We told you so” seems so inadequate…but ….WE TOLD YOU SO.

Of course there will be those who claim this was all just made up. Follow the links, check it for yourselves….


How Clinton Sold
Our Children to Islam

Much of this post researched and confirmed by Wes Vernon of NewsMax
and portions by Paul Sperry of WND. Sources thoroughly provided

Allah ‘s apostle said, ” I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,’ (Hadith 4:52:196*)

Islam’s Intent: Force or Persuasion
Islam’s number one priority is to make all the world Islam, either by persuasion or force, and during his term, President Clinton provided both by weakening our defenses and surrendering our children in public school without a whimper. “Negotiations for peace” would be better described as laying down dead.
Each time America suffered a terrorist attack, President Clinton issued statements promising to “find the terrorists” only to: pardon 16 terrorists convicted of executing 130 bombings; refuse delivery of Osama bin Laden from the Sudan; repeatedly refuse detailed information about al-Qaeda and Osama between terrorist bombings; shut down investigations of Islamic charities; radically downsize our military and gut the CIA. (1) (Details)

Robert Baer, a 21 year veteran of the CIA’s Directorate of Operations states:

“Whether it was Osama bin Laden, Yasir Arafat, Iranian terrorism, Saddam Hussein, or any of the other evils that so threaten the world, the Clinton administration seemed determined to sweep them all under the carpet.”(1)

Battleground: Public School
So just what DID President Clinton do? He “negotiated.” Evidence shows Clinton cut a deal with Islamic leaders to legalize and protect Muslim indoctrination in our public schools. If Clinton could give Islam the conversion of our youth, Islam’s resolve to destroy America would be appeased.

This was a tricky business with secular groups campaigning to strip all reference to the Bible and Christianity from schools. Therefore Clinton colluded with secular and religious-sounding groups and based his new Presidential Guidelines (2) on a document drafted by the American Muslim Council, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the ACLU which owns the copyright and many of the very groups attempting to censor Christianity today. This document can now be easily viewed (3) .

In the guidelines, every single “religious expression” that opens the door for Islam came equipped with a clause of escape, (2a) a backdoor for the ACLU to attack should anything Christian dare enter public schools under the same guidelines as Islam employs.

Clinton then presented these guidelines as originally drafted by 35 religious groups” and named it “Religious Expression in Public School. “Clinton failed to inform us, however, that these particular “religious groups” share a commitment to separation of church and state, as stated on the ACLU original draft. America, tired of censorship of Christian faith and noting the support of “35 religious groups”, gratefully accepted these guidelines, only to wonder why Christianity is continuously outlawed while Muslim indoctrination overwhelms our schools, including children praying to Allah, memorizing the Quran and fasting for Ramadan.

Clinton included assurance that all students would be coerced to attend their Muslim lessons. He went beyond the American Muslim Council/ACLU’s guidelines and added a clause stripping us of parental rights and religious freedom:

“Students generally do not have a Federal right to be excused from lessons that may be inconsistent with their religious beliefs or practices.”

That explains why parents cannot opt children out of these inductive classes for Islam, a huge loss of our religious freedom. It is also why my school district superintendent showed me these guidelines and literally laughed in my face when I pointed out the incongruity.

Clinton’s Steps of Betrayal
Clinton met frequently with Abdurahman Alamoudi, executive director of the American Muslim Council who participated in the original draft. Alamoudi supports Hezbollah and Hamas and was recently arrested on 9/28/03 for illegally receiving funds from Libya. Alamoudi was also friend and adviser on Islamic affairs to Hillary Rodham Clinton. Large meetings and events with Muslim leaders at the White House became commonplace, including celebrating the end of the Ramadan fast, (Eid) which Hillary claimed as “an American event.” Secretary of State Madeline Albright hosted Moslem groups, where she discussed recruiting Muslims for State Department posts. (1b)

Then in 1995, President Clinton presented his Religious Expression in Public School guidelines, and through his Secretary of Education, described these guidelines as drafted by “35 religious groups” listing eight names that sound Judeo-Christian, educational or patriotic, omitting the other recognizable culprits. Some of these “religious groups” have been filing lawsuits against the Bible while demanding a proselytizing version of Islam be forced down our throats today. (5) Clinton proved full knowledge and deceptive intent by falsely presenting these guidelines as drafted by “religious organizations.” (compare both documents [2] [3])

See Clinton’s “Religious” Groups Scrutinized

These guidelines greatly impact public schools today. CNN’s Lou Dobbs interviewed Nadine Strossen, President of the ACLU on Dec. 19, 2003. Strossen referred to these guidelines as the authority to support the ACLU’s lawsuits restricting Christmas celebrations and removing Nativity scenes from public schools. Strossen haughtily smiled as she said, “…and all these religious groups agreed to it!”

President Clinton and these “religious” partnerships opened wide the doors to our children’s forced “education” of a fairytale Islam, while the ACLU continues to convince the courts to censor the Bible and anything Christian.(4) (4a) Shamefully, the ACLU simultaneously fights for such causes as mandating freshmen to read selected quotes from the Koran. (5) The ACLU and the like issued the rules to go to court with, and President Clinton knowingly presented them as his own “Presidential Guidelines” as he made surreptitious speeches with much aplomb about God. America swallowed it hook, line and sinker.

Cheers at the Gate:
President Clinton’s religious guidelines are applauded by Islamic organizations such as SoundVision, which reminds Muslims it is their RELIGIOUS OBLIGATION (Dawa) to promulgate Islam and methodically explains how in public school today, thanks to Clinton:

“In the U.S. one of the strongest arguments in favor of seeking religious accommodation for your child is President Bill Clinton’s 1995 statement of principles addressing the extent to which religious expression and activity are permitted in public school. This was given to every school district in the United States.”(6)

“School students are routinely exposed in their classroom to new information and opinions, hence they tend to be more receptive to new beliefs and ideas. Schools are therefore fertile grounds where the seeds of Islam can be sowed inside the hearts of non-Muslim students. Muslim students should take ample advantage of this opportunity and expose their school mates to the beautiful beliefs of Islam.”

“It has been proven that one to one contact with non-Muslim students in the classroom is the most effective way to share Islam…It is advised that brother work on the non-Muslim boys and likewise sister work on girls.”(6a)

America does not comprehend how determined Muslims are to make America Islam. Suicide bombers and fundamentalists have already demonstrated their willingness to kill and die for it. To be granted rights to perform Dawa in America’s public schools was a huge victory for Islam. Clinton gave them Dawa, our schools, our very children with his religious guidelines and cloaked it with a false inclusion of Christianity.

The guidelines state:

“Students may also speak to, and attempt to persuade, their peers about religious topics just as they do with regard to political topics.”

“Students have a right to distribute religious literature to their schoolmates”

“Public schools may not provide religious instruction, but they may teach about religion, including the Bible or other scripture: the history of religion, comparative religion, the Bible (or other scripture)-as-literature.”

That was a quick but explosive line: “or other scripture-as-literature.” Pro-Islam materials and books began pouring in from Saudi Arabia and other Muslim nations. Under Clinton’s protection, completely ignoring set limitations which are never enforced for Islam, a small sample of what our textbooks contain includes:

  1. “The Quran is the final revelation, just as Muhammad is the final prophet.”

  2. (new paragraph) “The Arabic word Quran can be loosely translated as ‘recitation.” In fact, the very first word the angel Gabriel spoke to Muhammad was “Recite.” […in FACT???]

  3. “Ramadan is a holy time, because in this month Muhammad received his first message from Allah.” (13 for more)

Clinton’s guidelines were readily accepted by America as a sugarcoated pill promising our right to express our faith. America did not know the double standard installed or the original drafters’ confidence and resolve that the Bible would be excluded as played out in the courts today.

note: Soundvision states it is “Waqf fi sabellillah” which few Americans know means “devoting a plot of land [i.e. America] for Muslim religious purposes in the name of Allah.”

Islam Sends in Educational Troops
President Clinton clearly adopted Muslim religious beliefs into our public schools and proclaimed his success in his Ramadan message to Muslims.

President Clinton: “As America’s six-million-member Muslim community grows in numbers and prominence, Americans of every religious tradition are learning more about the origins and meaning of Islam. That on “the Night of Power,” the Angel Gabriel appeared to the Prophet Muhammad and revealed to him the first verses of the Koran. That the Koran declares that Ramadan was the month Allah’s words were sent down, and so should be spent in fasting.” (21)

America’s children certainly are learning these Muslim beliefs as fact, overseen by another Islamic educational organization that flourished under Clinton’s regime. The Council on Islamic Education (7) (CIE) contributed to our public school textbooks, funded by domestic Islamic donors perhaps aided by foreign support. Founder and director Shabbir Mansuri boasted that he is waging a “bloodless” revolution, promoting world cultures and faiths in America’s classrooms. (8) CIE has warned scholars and public officials who do not sympathize with its requests that they will be perceived as racists, reactionaries, and enemies of Islam.”(9)

Houghton Mifflin textbooks became saturated with Muslim beliefs as the Council of Islamic Education (CIE) helped write the textbook (originally denied until the publisher’s Editorial Director was caught bragging about it in print). After public outcry to the pro-Islamic bias of the textbook, “Across the Centuries”(10), the publisher Houghton Mifflin (HM) responded by stating that:

“…the Council on Islamic Education (CIE) did not contribute in writing the textbook. The scope of their involvement was limited to reviewing the textbook material.”

That denial was pure fabrication. In an earlier article at SoundVision, Abigail Jungreis, HM’s Editorial Director, credited CIE for providing textbook content:

“It is also with the help of the CIE that Houghton Mifflin’s textbooks have been able to show what Crusades were like for the Muslims. We’ve been able to give several perspectives on an event like that,” she says. “We see our reviewers as playing a crucial role in enabling us to present accurate and complete information” (11)

The textbook gives no indication that the Crusades section is based on the Muslim point of view, it is presented as fact and critical of Christians.

Founded in 1994, another Islamic organization during Clinton’s regime and dedicated to the re-education of America is the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR). Currently heavily scrutinized for its ties with terrorists, CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper states: “I wouldn’t want to create the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be Islamic… but I’m not going to do anything violent to promote that. I’m going to do it through education.” (12)

Textbooks: AK-47s of Islam & the Liberal Left
Corruption in our textbooks is undeniable as children are taught Muslim beliefs as fact (13) (13a) (13b) and teachers’ assignments require children to repeat them as such. (14) There are documented cases of children being asked to fast for Ramadan(15) and get on their hands and knees and pray to Allah.(16) Clinton’s nominee, U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton, recently approved this prayer as a lesson for children to learn:

“In the name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful.

Praise be to Allah, Lord of Creation,
The Compassionate, the Merciful,
King of Judgment-day!
You alone we worship, and to You alone we pray for help,
Guide us to the straight path.”

The Christian section in A Message of Ancient Days presents the Muslim version of Jesus, reduced to a “popular teacher with ideas.”(17)

With the protection of Clinton’s guidelines, Across the Centuries textbook (13) underwent multiple revisions led by Nader F. Darehshori, President of Houghton Mifflin and previously a school teacher in Iran which is 99% Muslim. Across the Centuries is described as “unfit for use in this country” by William J. Bennetta, President of The Textbook League. He states, “what Houghton Mifflin seeks to pass off as a history lesson is an exercise in deception, religious preaching, myth-mongering, and religious indoctrination.”

Pro-Islam bias in the textbooks have been substantiated by Daniel Pipes, PhD of the Middle East Forum, Dr. Robert Simonds, the American Textbook Council, and the Textbook League, all with whistleblowing conclusions. (18)

Children in the Trenches
Islam is determined to advance, entering by persuasion within our public schools and by sword at our borders. President Clinton has clearly provided both doorways as we are swarmed by Islam, courting our children while bombing our buildings.

Enter President Bush, met head-on by the onslaught of Islam fundamentalists, he took the bull by the horns at the brink of disaster and is courageously fighting to regain our nation. …But if President Bush has taken any action to clean up our schools from Muslim indoctrination, it is behind the scenes and I pray it is so…but with every day that passes, with every unanswered judgment by a treasonous court, hope for revival led by a godly president fades.

For as we are consumed with the war against terror, we cannot afford to neglect the battle raging over our children. We MUST restore sanity to our schools. Our Islam-inductive textbooks cost over $60 each for millions of children. States like California simply cannot afford to replace them. Our precious children are shouldering the burden as their religious freedoms have been stripped and they are being enticed to Islam, with their progress carefully watched by Muslim nations. For what other reason would a United Nations nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, refer its international members to the textbook reviews at BlessedCause, exposing Islamic propaganda and sounding a public alarm? (19) Why is Saudi Arabia consistently one of the highest foreign visitors to our website of over 70 countries a month? (20) Because Islam’s resolve for the destruction of America depends on America’s willingness to swallow conversion of our youth to Islam. As the Quran, Islam’s holy book dictates, we will become Islam or we are to be destroyed. (20a) It is clearly evident that Clinton made promises behind closed doors prior to his Ramadan message to Muslims. (21)

Casualty of Weak Leadership: Freedom
So as terrorists executed attacks on America, President Clinton slashed our defenses, gutted our intelligence, pardoned terrorists, halted investigations of Islamic charities and negotiated for peace, evidently with a powerful bargaining chip, our children through our public education system. Our children, our American heritage and our religious freedoms have been forfeit without a fight as our children are forced to learn “comparative religion” i.e., Islam propaganda, while criticizing both Judaism and Christianity in public school.

Is it hard to believe Clinton, professing to be Christian, could betray Christ and America like this? Examine the fruit. Lying under oath, dubious activities with staff, expediting RU-486, an abortion cocktail currently killing teenagers (22a), slipping in an ACLU document as written by “religious groups” is compounded when one remembers how Hillary demanded public funding for (brace yourself) a dung covered depiction of the Virgin Mary, with breasts of elephant dung, surrounded by genital pornography at the Brooklyn Museum in October 1999. (22) (23) Included in the exhibit was a depiction the Last Supper with a topless woman in the place of Jesus. Together the Clintons met with Muslim groups in the White House so often it became commonplace. In speeches against President Bush, Clinton has condemned America by blaming us for the Crusades. With this kind of history, it is not hard to believe Clinton betrayed America’s Christian heritage and used our children as bargaining chips in negotiations with Islamic leaders.

America, Sound the Call! Rally for the love of our children!
It is time to shout “ENOUGH” of the liberal left debasement of our nation and swindling of our religious freedom. It is time to recognize this is America, a melting pot to BE AMERICAN, complete with rich heritage, morals and values to be proud of. An America to fight and die for, not one to pollute, corrupt and lay open the borders for attack. What’s frightening is, so many Democrats are the embodiment of Clinton.

And so we look to God and President Bush. If President Clinton could outline Religious Expression in Public School, why couldn’t President Bush delegate and enforce a similar document, this time including the preservation of our American heritage, recognizing the Judeo-Christian foundation, tradition and culture of our nation. Only God could find a way to clean up our textbooks without infringing on our God-given freedom to choose. I pray He lead President Bush in accomplishing that goal.

America, pray for President Bush, pray for our troops and pray for revival, God is our only hope.


June 17, 2007 Posted by | Jihadists, Studies In Islam, Terrorists | 1 Comment


%d bloggers like this: