Attempting to Rewrite the History of September 11th
Camel Excrement: “extremism”, “radicalusn”, “Islamism”, “Jihadism”,.”Jihadi” & “al-Qaeda”!
Correct terminology: Islam, Muslims & Jihad. A wise man wrote, in ’01, “Its Islam, Stupid.”
The enemy ideology is Islam, normative Islam as enshrined in the Qur’an and exemplified by Moe’s Sunnah.
The footnote to NQ 2.190 is extra-Quranic, not canonical, but accurate. Reliance confirms it. Moe, speaking for Allah, said: “Fight them… until”, “Fight those who… until” & “Fight those of the disbelievers nearest you”. He personally engaged in 17 ghazwat, the battkles he ordered numbered 86. Each of the canonical hadith collections has a book of Jihad.
Offensive Jihad is a communal obligation: fard al-Kifaya which binds all eligible male Muslims until a sufficient number have reported to the front. When Kuffar retaliate, defensive Jihad is fard ayn: individually binding on all Muslims, just like Salat & Saum.
We do not have Muslim friends. We do not have Muslim Allies. All Muslims are our enemies and always will be so long as they believe in Allah, his threat & promise.
Muslims who attack us go to Allah’s celestial bordello. Muslims who terrorize get an upgrade. Muslims who sit at home and die without battle scars go to Hell.
Those who live by the pen, keyboard. microphone & camera will not tell you the explicit truth because to do so would jeapordize their income. Being an amateur, I am at liberty to tell it as it is, without holding back.
Any and every discussion of 9/11 and or Jihad should reference the fatal facts:
3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220. For those texts and more, see these blog posts:
Every history of the Accursed Abomination must include the confession of the most damnworthy Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and his co-conspirators, death & damnation be upon them!! Open minded men of good will will read this court document and curse Islam.
Every history of the Accursed Abomination must include the final instruction to the Mujihideen from the most damnworthy Mohammad Atta. Open minded men of good will will read this document and curse Islam.
One of the exhibits in the museum will feature a 7-minute film called “The Rise of Al Qaeda.”
In that film, the Al Qaeda terrorists are referred to as “Islamists” who were waging “jihad” with the attacks upon America.
Those two words, “Islamists” and “Jihad” have caused a controversy, with a variety of critics calling for whitewashing the description of Al Qaeda and the attacks by sanitizing the museum commentary by removing those two words.
This would be a tragic mistake.
Despite the complaints, the use of the terms “Islamist” and “jihad” in no way suggest that all Muslims are terrorists or support violence. No serious analyst in his or her right mind would make such an assertion.
Nevertheless, in warfare the enemy’s reality becomes your reality, so it makes perfect sense to call Islamists “Islamists” and to call Jihad “Jihad.” After all, in World War II, Nazis were…
View original post 1,510 more words