Innocence of Muslims Update: High Commissioner for Human Rights
Rupert Colville, Spokesman for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
Due to poor auditory accuity and worse typing
skills, this transcript is somewhat imperfect, but I managed to make
out the important points in the screed.
malicious and deliberately provocative. The film particularly
portrays a disgracefully distorted image of Muslims and the High
Clmmissioner has stated clearly she understands why people would want
to protest strongly against the film but obviously the cartoons as well
and makes clear their right to do so, but peacefully .
And, nevertheless, we obviously absolutely condemn the killings in
Bengazi and the killings that have taken place since then we understand
around thirty people have now died liniked to the film in particular
and there’s no possible justification for the violence and destructive
reactions. We urge religious and political leaders to make a
major effort to restore calm and we welcome the fact that very senior
Muslim figures have been saying similar things about …writing about
these provocations–stupid provocations.
I am not going to post the Charlie Hebdo cartoons,
but I have posted a link to Bare Naked Islam,
where you can see them in all their peurility. The sub sophomoric
cartoons seem to be takeoffs on the video: “Innocence of Muslims”and
Muslim reaction to it. Here is the video for those who have not
yet viewed it or need a refresher.
malicious and provocative
Of course they are provocative, they are intended to
provoke thought and inquiry. And people are inquiring about
whether or not the video reflects reality or fiction. The lucky ones
are viewing my blog post which documents the conceptual content
of the video. Dr. Ali Sina has written that it is necessary to
insult Muslims to get their attention. I agree with him. In
my opinion, the video, while provocative, is not malicious. Hebdo
seems to be pushing his pen over the line. I perceive that the French
cartoonist shares the attitude of Pat Condell and raises it to a
new order of magnitude.
They wound up Pat real tight, didn’t they! Of course he is factually
and logically right.
The video does not portray Muslims in general, it
portrays Moe and his companions. The portrayal of Moe is
accurate: he was insane, suicidal, a lecherous pedophile, barbarian
warlord and false prophet. Ample documentation of the fatal facts
is provided here: http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the
Because Islam is what Moe said and did, the video
also portrays Islam accurately. It is pure, unmitigated evil: a
continuing crime against humanity– predation. When Moe declares
that infidels are to be killed, their widows raped, orphans enslaved
and property seized, he is describing the central mission of
What is the “original religion”
of Islam? What is the economic system of Islam? I will let
Moe answer those questions because he was the expert.
Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:
I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah
transaction, hold the tailsof oxen, are pleased
with agriculture, and give up
conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over
you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.
How did Moe get his income? The Qur’an &
hadith have clues for you.
he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made
a great slaughter
(among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world
(i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires
(for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Whenever a dead man in debt was brought to Allah’s
Apostle he would ask, “Has he left anything to repay his debt?” If he
was informed that he had left something to repay his debts, he would
offer his funeral prayer, otherwise he would tell the Muslims to offer
their friend’s funeral prayer. When
Allah made the Prophet wealthy through conquests, he said, “I am
more rightful than other believers to be the guardian of the believers,
so if a Muslim dies while in debt, I am responsible for the repayment
of his debt, and whoever leaves wealth (after his death) it will belong
to his heirs. “
from Ibn ‘Umar from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, “My provision has been
placed under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and humility
have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.
This is a blog post, not a college course. If
you want more detail, read these related blog posts:
Muslims do not require provocation to attack
infidels. Islam considers infidels to be rebels against Allah who deserve to be
killed. Reliance of the Traveller, O9.1 describes the
communal obligation to mount a minimum of one military expedition
against innocent infidels in every year. Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, page 141 is explicit.
incurred by infidels, although
they be not the first aggressors, as
appears from various passages in the sacred writings which are
generally received this effect.
Infidelity means not being Muslim; a status offense
carying the death penalty. Infidels are to be destroyed as per
the quote from Hedaya shown above. Moe’s need for income caused
him to compromise, substituting extortion or destruction in the case of
Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians. For the disgusting details, begin
reading at page 213.
The first amendment was created because, in a
representative republic, freedom to criticize the government and it
policies is necessary to maintenance of liberty. Likewise, we must be
free to identify, accurately describe and warn against sources of
impending danger. Thomas Jefferson bought a ‘Qur’an to learn the
doctrines of his enemy before fighting the Barbary Wars. Since
the Accursed Abomination, we need to be able to accurately describe,
criticize and raise the alarm against Islam, whose damnable doctrines
motivated the murderers who perpetrated the attack.
The Fort Hood Massacre happened precicely because
the government turned an eye blinded by political correctness away from
the curseworthy belief system of Maj. Nidal Malik Hassan. Now
they are preventing our officer corps from receiving accurate training
about enemy doctrine. George Washington said it best.