Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Innocence of Islam Update: Heinous Defamation of Islam Petition


A growing number of Muslims has been searching the web for a petition
demanding the banning of the video: Innocence of Muslims. Their
searches have taken them to my blog posts about the video.  Now a
petition has been uttered and published and I am taking it apart bit by
bit because I take every instance of bitching about Islamophobia as an
opportunity to redouble exposure of Islam’s rotten core.

I am aware of the possibility that this blog post
will increase the petition’s publicity and signatures. So be it.
I have no doubt that it will receive far more signatures than the counter petition for preservation of free speech
because Muslims are organized and highly motivated.

Heinous Defamation of Islam and slandering of Prophet Muhammad must be
stopped from being labeled as Freedom of Expression and Action


In the light of the movie “Innocence of
Muslims” the International Defamation Laws regarding religions must be

An act of freedom is committed for liberation not for causing violence.
Defamation of Religions must be barred. FREEdom of expression and
action does not mean letting all hell lose if that be the case then
there should never have been any laws made or enforced.

Any statement or act that causes social, political and mental unrest to
any section, sector, social group of society must have a law against it


movie “Innocence of Muslims” must be internationally banned and
International Defamation Laws must be revised to ensure that no more
intolerable religious slandering and defamation is carried out by any
individual or group of individuals against any Religious groups.

Innocence of Muslims

Islamic doctrine holds that only Muslims are
innocent: all others are rebelling against Allah and his Messenger.
Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:33
lists the punishments  applicable to rebels against Allah and his
Messenger including crucifixion, amputations and expulsion.  It is
only when we turn to Tafsir Ibn Kathir
that we learn the meaning of “wage war” in this context.  A list
of alternative elements is included, and it “includes disbelief.”

Anyone who does not believe in Allah and
embrace Islam is guilty of “waging war against Allah and his
subject to execution.  The Hanifi school’s code of Shari’ah rules
that infidelity is to be punished by “destruction” .  In the case
of Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians, payment of Jizya may be substituted for destruction.  It
also states that Infidels may be attacked without provocation.
For the details on Jizya, click the link above and scroll up to page

Are Muslims innocent?

Muslims are commanded to obey Allah and his Messenger.  They are
commanded to emulate Muhammad.  Allah’s imperatives which must be obeyed include: offensive conquest
against Pagans and People of the Book, terrorism [See also 8:57
& 8:60]
and genocide. Moe’s exemplary conduct to be emulated
includes: offensive conquest, genocide. rape of captured women and extortion.

To the extent that Muslims obey Allah and emulate Moe as they are commanded to do, they are
not innocent.  To the extent that they disobey, they are hypocrites, whose Islam goes no deper than their throats, who are to be killed.

International Defamation Laws

There are no international laws prohibiting
defamation of religion.  The HRC & GA resolutions passed each
year for the last decade do not have the force of law, they serve only
to give immoral authority to national blasphemy laws, which are used to
persecute indigenous minorities. An Ad Hoc Cmte. of the HRC has been
established to elaborate complementary standards to be injected
into ICERD through a binding protocol which would impose Islamic blasphemy law on the signatories to ICERD.

Under Shari’ah, any contradiction of Islam is
punishable. Simply saying “Jesus is Lord” can cost you your head.
Reviling Allah, Moe or Islam can cost you your head.  It is
labeled as mentioning “anything impermissible“.  Simple denial of
Allah’s deity  or Moe’s prophethood is sufficient.

Under the numerous resolutions, associating Islam
with terrorism is condemned.  If the Ad Hoc Cmte. is successful,
this listing of evidence of the association will be a criminal
offense.  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

act of freedom

Our founders revolted against King George in 1776.
Ten years later, J.Q. Adams and T. Jefferson were asking Tripoli’s
Ambassador to England by what right the Barbary Pirates sacked our
shipping.  They were told that it was written in their laws that
Infidels should be attacked.  You would make Jefferson’s report to
Congress a criminal act.

free speech

Free speech is essential to a representative
republic so that the citizens can discuss political issues and matters
of state without fear of persecution.  The First Amendment
guarantees that we can criticize President Obama and his policies
without fear of arrest and detention.


  • “Islam is a great religion of peace”
  • “We are not at war with Islam.”
  • “Our Muslim allies.”

Each and every one of those statements is a
God damned lie. Our liberties would be denied and our lives endangered
by criminalizing uttering & publishing refutations of those
lies.  For example: this list of relevant ayat is proof of the
falsehood of the third listed lie. You would make this a criminal

3:1184:89, 4:139, 4:1445:51, 9:23, 9:33, 60:1, 60:13

Our lives and liberties are already endangered by
prohibiting instructors at West Point and the War College from telling
the truth about Islamic doctrine and practice.

causing violence

Violence is caused by the damnable doctrines of
Islam, not by exposing them in videos.  The Innocence of Muslims
was on line for more than a month with no violence until it was
exploited by Egyptians as a pretext for violence required by their
damnable doctrines.


To be defamatory, speech must be false and malicious
under Western legal standards. Islam’s slander law is different; it
prohibits any speech the subject does not like.

R2.2: Slander

Slander (ghiba) means to mention anything concerning a
person that he would dislike
, whether about his body, religion, everyday life,
self, disposition, property, son, father, wife, servant, turban,
garment, gait, movements, smiling, dissoluteness, frowning,
cheerfulness, or anything else connected with him.

defamation of Islam

Islam is already infamous because Moe deliberately
built a reputation for barbarian rapine so as to terrorize future
victims, rendering them incapable of mounting an effective
defense.  I refer doubters, dissenters and deniers to  8:57 & 59:13. See, for example, the reaction of one
Jewish settlement:

When they saw the Prophet; they said, “Muhammad and his army!
Prophet said, Allahu–Akbar!
(Allah is Greater) and Khaibar is ruined,
for whenever we approach a nation (i.e. enemy to fight) then it will be
a miserable morning for those who have been warned.”  Sahih Bukhari 4.52.195

The video does not defame Moe or Islam because its
conceptual content is true.  I disrespectfully direct doubters,
dissenters & deniers to another blog post which documents the fatal


By tradition, it is assumed that anything wearing
the mantle of religion is one, and is an equally valid pathway to
deity, on a par with Judaism and Christianity.  Assumptions make
asses of you.  Islam is perpetual war, far from being benign,
beneficent and anodyne, it is mercenary, martial and malignant.  For those damned
fools who know
that “Islam is not war”, I have a surprise: Moe told the truth

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction,
hold the tails
of oxen, are
pleased with agriculture, and
give up conducting jihad
(struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over
and will not withdraw it until you return to your original

Jihad is the original religion
of Islam, which must not be abandoned on pain of execration.
Jihad is preferred  over agriculture and trade as an economic


If defamation of religions were banned, and the
proscriptions on genocide and propaganda for war were enforced, the
Shari’ah, along with Qur’an,  hadith  & tafsir would be
outlawed and their publication & reading prohibited. I
disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to 1:6, 5:60, 9:34 & 98:6.

September 22, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Petitions, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Innocence of Muslims Update: High Commissioner for Human Rights

Rupert Colville, Spokesman for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights


Due to poor auditory accuity and worse typing
skills, this transcript is somewhat imperfect, but I managed to make
out the important points in the screed.

Both the film and the czrtoons are
malicious and deliberately provocative. The film  particularly
portrays a disgracefully distorted image of Muslims and the High
Clmmissioner has stated clearly she understands why people would want
to protest strongly against the film but obviously the cartoons as well
and makes clear their right to do so, but peacefully .

And, nevertheless, we obviously absolutely condemn the killings in
Bengazi and the killings that have taken place since then we understand
around thirty people have now died liniked to the film in particular
and there’s no possible justification for the violence and destructive
reactions.  We urge religious and political leaders to make a
major effort to restore calm and we welcome the fact that very senior
Muslim figures have been saying similar things about …writing about
these provocations–stupid provocations.

I am not going to post the Charlie Hebdo cartoons,
but I have posted a link to Bare Naked Islam,
where you can see them in all their peurility. The sub sophomoric
cartoons seem to be takeoffs on the video: “Innocence of Muslims”and
Muslim reaction to it.  Here is the video for those who have not
yet viewed it or need a refresher.

malicious and provocative

Of course they are provocative, they are intended to
provoke thought and inquiry.  And people are inquiring about
whether or not the video reflects reality or fiction. The lucky ones
are viewing my blog post which documents the conceptual content
of the video.  Dr. Ali Sina has written that it is necessary to
insult Muslims to get their attention.  I agree with him.  In
my opinion, the video, while provocative, is not malicious.  Hebdo
seems to be pushing his pen over the line. I perceive that the French
cartoonist  shares the attitude of Pat Condell and raises it to a
new order of magnitude.

They wound up Pat real tight, didn’t they! Of course he is factually
and logically right.

distorted image

The video does not portray Muslims in general, it
portrays Moe and his companions.  The portrayal of Moe is
accurate: he was insane, suicidal, a lecherous pedophile, barbarian
warlord and false prophet.  Ample documentation of the fatal facts
is provided here:

Because Islam is what Moe said and did, the video
also portrays Islam accurately.  It is pure, unmitigated evil: a
continuing crime against humanity– predation.  When Moe declares
that infidels are to be killed, their widows raped, orphans enslaved
and property seized, he is describing the central mission of

original religion

What is the “original religion
of Islam?  What is the economic system of Islam?  I will let
Moe answer those questions because he was the expert.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah
transaction, hold the tails
of oxen, are pleased
with agricultur
e, and give up
conducting jihad
(struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over
and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.


How did Moe get his income?  The Qur’an &
hadith have clues for you.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that
he should have prisoners of war
(and free them with ransom) until he had made
a great slaughter
(among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world
(i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires
(for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.


Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 37, Number 495:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

Whenever a dead man in debt was brought to Allah’s
Apostle he would ask, “Has he left anything to repay his debt?” If he
was informed that he had left something to repay his debts, he would
offer his funeral prayer, otherwise he would tell the Muslims to offer
their friend’s funeral prayer. When
Allah made the Prophet wealthy through conquests
, he said, “I am
more rightful than other believers to be the guardian of the believers,
so if a Muslim dies while in debt, I am responsible for the repayment
of his debt, and whoever leaves wealth (after his death) it will belong
to his heirs. “


Bukhari  Ch 61 # 2756: …It is mentioned
from Ibn ‘Umar from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, “My provision has been
placed under the shadow of my spear
, and abasement and humility
have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.

This is a blog post, not a college course.  If
you want more detail, read these related blog posts:


Muslims do not require provocation to attack
infidels.  Islam considers infidels to be rebels against Allah who deserve to be
killed.  Reliance of the Traveller, O9.1 describes the
communal obligation to mount a minimum of one military expedition
against innocent infidels in every year.  Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, page 141 is explicit.

The destruction of the
sword  is
incurred by infidels
, although
they be not the first aggressors
, as
appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
generally received this effect.


Infidelity means not being Muslim; a status offense
carying the death penalty.  Infidels are to be destroyed as per
the quote from Hedaya shown above.  Moe’s need for income caused
him to compromise, substituting extortion or destruction in the case of
Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians. For the disgusting details, begin
reading at page  213.

free expression

The first amendment was created because, in a
representative republic, freedom to criticize the government and it
policies is necessary to maintenance of liberty. Likewise, we must be
free to identify, accurately describe and warn against sources of
impending danger.  Thomas Jefferson bought a ‘Qur’an to learn the
doctrines of his enemy before fighting the Barbary Wars.  Since
the Accursed Abomination, we need to be able to accurately describe,
criticize and raise the alarm against Islam, whose damnable doctrines
motivated the murderers who perpetrated the attack.

The Fort Hood Massacre happened precicely because
the government turned an eye blinded by political correctness away from
the curseworthy belief system of Maj. Nidal Malik Hassan.  Now
they are preventing our officer corps from receiving accurate training
about enemy doctrine.  George Washington said it best.

the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led,
like sheep to the slaughter.




September 22, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment


%d bloggers like this: