Innocence of Muslims Update: Hisham Kandil: Go to Hell!
Egypt’s Prime Minister Hisham Kandil
to take a firm position1
toward this film’s producers2 within the framework of
international charters3 that criminalise acts that stir
on the basis of race, colour or religion5.”
This is what the Minister is bitching about:
I believe that the primary source is Martin Ling’s Sira, which is considerably shorter
than Guillaume’s. Much of the story can be verified in Ibn Sa’d’s Sira –
including the hallucinations, suicidal tendency and
offensive violence. The murders commissioned by Moe are
documented here: List
of Killings Ordered or Supported by Muhammad. Moe really did
marry the six year old daughter of his bosom buddy; for the details, go
Age of Consummation.
doubters & deniers:
the most significant quotes from Hishham’s Rescension of Ibn Ishaq’s
Sira & Tabari’s Tahrik are to be found in the topical quotes
appendix of The Prophet of Doom. You can save a great deal of time by
perusing these listings in the right sidebar.:
- This is a demand for censorship: prohibition
and punishment of publishing facts unflattering to Islam.
- The writer, director, producer and
distributors are acting within their rights guaranteed by the Bill of
Rights cited below.
- Article 19
Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.
Everyone shall have the right to freedom of
this right shall include freedom to seek, receive
and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers,
either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through
any other media of his choice.
The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article
carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore
be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are
provided by law and are necessary:
For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre
public), or of public health or morals.
Any propaganda for
shall be prohibited by law.
Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to
discrimination, hostility or violence5 shall be prohibited by law.
- Amendment I Congress shall
make no law respecting an establishment of religion5, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom
of speech, or of the press6; or the right of the
to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
film is not an act stirring strife. Nowhere in the video is the
audience exhorted to perform any violent act. Muslims rioted in
Egypt and Libya because they are Muslims: rabble roused by the media,
Imams and militia leaders, not because of the video clip.
Islamic law declares that “Infidels may be attacked without provocation“.
Five of the 9/11 conspirators signed a statement which included this
sentence: “Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest
religious duty to fight you over your infidelity.”
White; both are Muslims: what race is Islam? Islam is not a race! What
legitimate religion is mercenary: created for the personal emolument of
its founder through the accrual of spoils of war? What legitimate
religion is violent: commanding and mandating perpetual war? What
legitimate religion mandates the execution of anyone who apostatizes? Islam is not a legitimate religion!
- The video imparts information: by
means of the video, people unable or unwilling to read can discover
that Moe was an impious fraud who falsely attributed his own words to
his god. They can discover his pederasty & lechery and
his barbarism. The audience has a right to know, even though
Muslims desperately need to conceal those facts, which, if widely
known, will be fatal to Islam.
- There is no right to be shielded from all
criticism. Islam is not a living person and has no human rights in any
- Moe died in 632, he can not be injured
by revelation of his evil character. Islam is not a living person
and has no right to be shielded from criticism.
- When any Imam shouts “Jihad”,
he violates this provision. The Qur’an violates this provision in
the following ayat [and others]: 2:216, 8:39, 9:29, 9:123. The authentic hadith collection of Imam
Bukhari violates this provision in these ahadith [and others]: 1.8.387, 4.52.177. Shari’ah violates this provision in the Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.
It is therefore necessary that Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition,
jurisprudence & exegesis be proscribed by law and Islam be outlawed
because it inculcates hatred and incites violence.
- Congress is prohibited from enforcing
- Congress is prohibited from censoring
truthful and passive expression; the movie can not be censored because
it is truthful and does not exhort viewers to violent acts.
No comments yet.