Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Innocence of Muslims Update: Obamination

Since our founding, the United States
has been a nation that respects all faiths.  We reject all efforts
to denigrate the religious beliefs of others.  But there is
absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence.
None.  The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these
brutal acts.


respects all faiths

Respect is given where respect is due.  Do we
respect the Mafia?  Then why should we respect Islam, which began
as an Arab crime syndicate?  I direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers to another blog post which details with full documentation
Moe’s mission & motivation: Islam’s Mercenary Mission.

Is a belief system whose deity demands “great slaughter” as its Profit’s price of
admission to Paradise worthy of respect?  Does any sane
person respect a predatory way of life whose “original religion” is Jihad?

Does any believing Christian respect a faith that
denies the deity, crucifixion, death & resurrection of Jesus
Christ, depicts him as inferior to its Profit and reveres him as a genocidal warlord who will complete their genocide of the Jews?

denigrate beliefs

How is it possible to blacken that which is already
black?  What pious person who believes in the Almighty Creator
would follow a “Prophet” who, after the commencement of his ministry, married
the six year old daughter
of his bosom buddy, raped a prisoner of war and commissioned the murders of his critics?

In Shari’ah,
slander is anything the listener does not like.  In our legal
system, truth is an absolute defense against slander and
defamation.  “Innocence of Muslims” depicts Moe as a megalomaniac.
Was he a megalomaniac, or does the video defame him? To discover the
answer, turn to this appendix of quotes in The Prophet of Doom and read
relevant quotes from Ishaq, Tabari, the Qur’an & Sahih Bukhari:

The video depicts Moe as a lustful lecher; is it
true or does it defame him?
The video depicts Moe as a warmonger; is it true or does it defame

The video depicts Moe as insane or demon possessed;
is it true or does it defame him?

The video depicts Moe as suicidal; was he suicidal or does it defame

The video depicts Moe as faking the Qur’an; did he
fake it or does it defame him?  Why don’t you consult his child
bride for the real answer? Her answer is in Sahih Bukhari 3.30.311. ” I feel that your Lord
hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires.”

Watch the trailer; the casting, acting and
production values leave something to be desired, but the content is
accurate.  I have provided links to the Noble Qur’an, Sahih
Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, Sunan Abu Dawud, Tafsir Ibn Kathir and The
Prophet of Doom
  so that you can determine the truth for

In a just and rational world, documenting the
absolute evil of Islam’s founder and the continuing war crime he
founded would not be left up to amateurs, it would be done by our
government, to the highest professional standards and distributed world
wide as our best weapon in the “war on terrorism”.  Defeating Islam requires breaking their faith.
Exposing their profit and demon is the first step in that process. Our
government should be doing it, not bitterly bitching about it!

September 13, 2012 Posted by | free speech, Islam, Islam Distorted?, Political Correctness | , , , | Leave a comment

Innocence of Muslims Update: Hisham Kandil: Go to Hell!

Egypt’s Prime Minister Hisham Kandil

 “We ask the American government
to take a firm position1
toward this film’s producers2 within the framework of
international charters3 that criminalise acts that stir
on the basis of race, colour or religion5.”

This is what the Minister is bitching about:

I believe that the primary source is Martin Ling’s Sira, which is considerably shorter
than Guillaume’s. Much of the story can be verified in Ibn Sa’d’s Sira
including the  hallucinations, suicidal tendency  and
offensive violence.  The murders commissioned by Moe are
documented here:  List
of Killings Ordered or Supported by Muhammad
.  Moe really did
marry the six year old daughter of his bosom buddy; for the details, go
to:  Aisha’s
Age of Consummation

Attention Lazy
doubters & deniers
the most significant quotes from Hishham’s Rescension of Ibn Ishaq’s
Sira & Tabari’s Tahrik are to be found in the topical quotes
appendix of The Prophet of Doom. You can save a great deal of time by
perusing these listings in the right sidebar.:

  1. This is a demand for censorship: prohibition
    and punishment of publishing facts unflattering to Islam.
  2. The writer, director, producer and
    distributors are acting within their rights guaranteed by the Bill of
    Rights cited below.
  3. ICCPR
    [Emphasis added.]

    • Article 19
    • 1.
      Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.

      Everyone shall have the right to freedom of

      this right shall include freedom to seek, receive
      and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers,
      either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through
      any other media of his choice.

      The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article
      carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore
      be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are
      provided by law and are necessary:

      For respect of the rights2 or reputations3 of

      For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre
      public), or of public health or morals.

    • Article 20

      Any propaganda for
      shall be prohibited by law

      Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to
      discrimination, hostility or violence
      5 shall be prohibited by law.

    • Amendment I Congress shall
      make no law
      respecting an establishment of religion5, or
      prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom
      of speech, or of the press6
      ; or the right of the
      people peaceably
      to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
  4. Publishing a video clip of a documentary
    film is not an act stirring strife.  Nowhere in the video is the
    audience exhorted to perform any violent act.  Muslims rioted in
    Egypt and Libya because they are Muslims: rabble roused by the media,
    Imams and militia leaders, not because of the video clip.

    Islamic law declares that “Infidels may be attacked without provocation“.
    Five of the 9/11 conspirators signed a statement which included this
    sentence:  “Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest
    religious duty to fight you over your infidelity

  5. Siraj Wahhaj is Black, Ibrahim Hooper is
    White; both are Muslims: what race is Islam?  Islam is not a race!  What
    legitimate religion is mercenary: created for the personal emolument of
    its founder through the accrual of spoils of war?  What legitimate
    religion is violent: commanding and mandating perpetual war?  What
    legitimate religion mandates the execution of anyone who apostatizesIslam is not a legitimate religion!


  1. The video imparts information: by
    means of the video, people unable or unwilling to read can discover
    that Moe was an impious fraud who falsely attributed his own words to
    his god.   They can discover his pederasty & lechery and
    his barbarism.  The audience has a right to know, even though
    Muslims desperately need to conceal those facts, which, if widely
    known, will be fatal to Islam.
  2. There is no right to be shielded from all
    criticism. Islam is not a living person and has no human rights in any
  3. Moe died in 632, he can not be injured
    by revelation of his evil character.  Islam is not a living person
    and has no  right  to be shielded from criticism.
  4. When any Imam shouts “Jihad”,
    he violates this provision.  The Qur’an violates this provision in
    the following ayat [and others]:  2:216, 8:39, 9:29, 9:123. The authentic hadith collection of Imam
    Bukhari violates this provision in these ahadith [and others]: 1.8.387, 4.52.177. Shari’ah violates this provision in the Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.
    It is therefore necessary that Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition,
    jurisprudence & exegesis be proscribed by law and Islam be outlawed
    because it inculcates hatred and incites violence.
  5. Congress is prohibited from enforcing
  6. Congress is prohibited from censoring
    truthful and passive expression; the movie can not be censored because
    it is truthful and does not exhort viewers to violent acts.

September 13, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment


%d bloggers like this: