Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Innocence of Muslims, Guilt of Muhammad, Treason of the State Department

The U.S. Embassy in Cairo issued a most disgusting statement; an
apology to the brethren of the 19 G’d’d Muslims who wreaked havoc on us
eleven years ago.  The statement is tantamount to treason and
should result in the removal from office of the President and Secretary
of State.  I have reproduced the statement below, inserting
superscripts linked to my commentary which follows below the video and
the horizontal line.  [Click a superscript to read the associated
comment, use your Back space key to return to your place in the

Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts
by misguided individuals1 to hurt the religious feelings
of Muslims2
as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions3. Today,
the 11th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the
United States, Americans are honoring our patriots and those who serve
our nation as the fitting response4 to the enemies of democracy5. Respect
for religious beliefs6
is a cornerstone of American democracy7. We firmly reject the actions
by those who abuse8
the universal right of free speech9 to hurt the religious beliefs10
of others


“Innocence of Muslims”

Many Muslims are descendants of early victims of
Islam who were converted at sword point or forced to convert by the
impoverishing imposition of jizya.  They may be Muslims in name
only or secular; they may be unaware of the evil character of Moe or
the damnable doctrines & practices given ‘divine’ sanction by his
‘revelations’.  But they are part of the Ummah al-Islamiya and
form the lower level base of support for the believers who engage in

Defeating terrorism requires confronting Islam on
the ideological battlefield, something our government is unwilling to
do.  The ideological plane of this war is left to the private
sector.  The video sampled in the clip used as an excuse for the
barbarian rampage in Egypt and Libya  has the potential to be a
powerful weapon in this battle: the equivalent of a Little Boy &
Fat Man which brought WW2 to an end in the Pacific.  If the
demon’s slaves have not prevailed to pull it down from You Tube, you
will find it embedded below.   I want you to watch it and
share it.  lets make it go viral!

The article at the Atlantic is my first introduction
to this work of art.  It ain’t perfect. The man cast as Moe seems
a bit young for the role.  The murder of Kinana is not exactly as it happened.  The
murder of Um Quirfa is accurately depicted.

By Jesus, until last year I had not darkened the
door of a theater since 1967.  My recent visit was to a free movie
honoring the 70th. anniversary of a relative.  But, If I find this
movie in the local theater, I blessed will go and watch it, with great
joy and pleasure.  And then I will publish a more complete

So, it pisses off Muslims. That is a good thing; it
gets their attention.  Let them watch it and listen.  Let the
few who are literate turn to the two Sahihs, Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul
Allah, Tabari’s Tahrik, Ibn Sa’d’s Sira and The Sealed Nectar seeking
facts to disprove the film’s accurate depiction of Moe.  They will
find only confirmation of the worst of it.

Muslims need to learn the truth about Moe &
Allah even more than we do.  They must, to escape eternal
damnation, emancipate themselves from Allah’s yoke of slavery.
Once they know the fatal facts, those who retain a scintilla of
vestigial morality will apostatize.  If enough of them do so at
one time, the Salafis will not be able to kill all of them and the
empire of Islam which Moe built will crumble into dust.

Moe really was a lunatic, suffering hallucinations
as a side effect of epileptic seizures. He really did perceive that he
had wrestled with a demon, was possessed, and set out to commit
suicide. He really did marry the six year old daughter of his closest
friend.  He really did suborn murder. he really did attribute
divine sanction to rape, pillage & plunder. Islam really is pure,
unmitigated evil and that is the God blessed truth.

History Recycles

Those who will not learn from history really will be
doomed to repeat it.  When America declared independence, she lost
the protection of the English Navy and her merchantmen were sacked and
their crews held for ransom or sold into slavery.  The new nation
was nearly bankrupted by exaction of tribute.  Adams and Jefferson
asked Tripoli’s Ambassador by what right they attacked us.  His
answer should serve as a life saving lesson, but it has been widely

ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the
Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all
nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that
it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could
be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and
that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure
to go to heaven.

Where have we seen that before?  Only in the most authentic of the
hadith collections: Sahih Bukhari; a Persian general got a similar
answer from one of Umar’s generals.

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord,
has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya
(i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:–
“Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to
lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us
remain alive, shall become your master.” 4.53.386

We could have learned from that, but we did not.  We could have
learned from the ravings of the “blind sheikh”, but we did not.
We could have learned from the threats issued by Usama bin Ladin, but
we did not.  We have one more chance, with the confession of
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, will we ever learn? [Emphasis added.]

Many thanks to God, for his kind
gesture, and choosing us to perform the act of Jihad for his cause and
to defend Islam and Muslims.

Therefore, killing
you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you, responding
back to your

attacks, are all
considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion
. These actions are our
offerings to

God. In
addition, it is the imposed reality on Muslims in Palestine, Lebanon,
Afghanistan, Iraq, in the

land of the two holy sites [Mecca and Medina, Saudi Arabia], and in the
rest of the world, where

Muslims are suffering from your brutality, terrorism, killing ofthe
innocent, and occupying their lands

and their holy sites. Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest religious duty to fight
you over your

infidelity. However,
today, we fight you over defending Muslims, their land, their holy
sites,and their

religion as a whole.

One sentence stands out beyond the rest:  “Nevertheless, it would
have been the greatest
religious duty to fight you over your

infidelity.” That vital
clue meshes with an infamous statement found in one codeification of

Hedaya Vol II, Book IX, Ch. 1 Pg.
141  PDF 154

  • Text
    •     The destruction of the sword  is
      incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as
      appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
      generally received this effect.
  • Marginal Note
    • Infidels may be attacked without provocation.

Muslims do not require provocation to attack
us.  They attack us because we are not Muslims, that is
provocation enough.

  1. Rev. Terry Jones and the creators of
    “Innocence of Muslims” are not misguided, Muslims are.  Both have
    read the Qur’an and at least one sira, Muslims are misguided: they
    believe that excrement, Jones and the movie’s creator recognize Islam
    for what it is: a demonic system of intra-species predation.
  2. Dr. Ali Sina has said that it is necessary to
    insult Muslims in order to get their attention, sort of like whacking a
    stubborn mule with a piece of lumber. The objective is education, not
  3. When did you condemn the Qur’an because of
    its insults and execrations against Jews & Christians?  When
    did you condemn its declaration of genocidal warfare against
    us?   Take your tongue out of Satan’s anus long enough to
    condemn these egregious verses:  1:6, 2:161, 5:60, 9:29, 9:30, 98:6.
  4. The fitting response to genocidal
    conquest; existential war is extermination.  Instead, Slick Willy
    treated it as a common criminal matter. Shrub sent men to bleed and die
    where he should have sent nukes.
  5. Democracy is mob rule, as likely to
    result in tyranny as good government. Our founders gave us a limited,
    representative republic, whose existential  enemy should be
    exterminated, not appeased & apologized to.
  6. Evidently you respect the belief that “Only
    Allah has the right to be worshiped.”; I do not, I condemn it because
    it is a denial of my rights as a Christian. Evidently you respect the
    belief that Allah demands continuous conquest; I do not, I condemn it
    because it is the basis of existential warfare against us.
    Evidently you respect the belief that a Prophet must make “a great
    slaughter” before holding prisoners for ransom; I do not, I condemn the
    sanctification of genocide.  Evidently you respect the belief that
    Infidels may be attacked without provocation, their widows raped and
    their orphans sold into slavery; you can go to Hell with the
  7. The cornerstone of our republic is
    individualism. Freedom of religion means freedom to choose among legitimate
    religions or none at all, without having any religion imposed by force
    or law.  If you had read and understood 3:85, 3:110, Bukhari 6.60.80 and 8:39, you would know that Islam contravenes our
    rights; imposing itself by force.
  8. This blog post is not an abuse of free
    speech, it is an effort to educate and arouse fellow citizens so that
    they will rise up as one disrespectfully demanding the extinction of
    Islam.  Paul Revere’s ride was not an abuse of free speech.
    “Innocence of Muslims”, International Judge the Koran Day and
    International Judge Muhammad Day are not abuses of free speech, they
    are legitimate warnings of clear, imminent and persistent
  9. Inoffensive speech does not require
    protection. It is specifically offensive speech: expressions of fact
    and logical opinion which piss off violators of human rights that
    requires the protection afforded by the first amendment.  Moe had
    his critics murdered, they needed protection; they did not have
  10. Charlie Brown said it best
    “Nobody likes having his cherished beliefs questioned.” Muslims believe
    that they serve Allah by killing and terrorizing us.  There is
    nothing wrong about exposing and offending that belief!


September 12, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, Treason | , , , , | Leave a comment


%d bloggers like this: