Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

The Right to Peace: Terrorism


A/HRC/20/31

Report of the Human Rights Council Advisory

Committee on the right of peoples to peace

This report contains the draft declaration on the
right to peace. The draft is a prime example of irrational arrogance,
mixing International Socialism and anthropomorphic global warming but I
am not going to detail those issues in this post because I want to
concentrate on its worst provision.

Article 7 on page six of the nine page report
contains the worst provision of the draft declaration on the right to
peace.

Article 7. Resistance and opposition to oppression

1. All peoples and individuals have the right to resist and oppose
oppressive colonial, foreign occupation or dictatorial domination
(domestic oppression).

2. Everyone has the right to oppose aggression, genocide, war crimes
and crimes against humanity, violations of other universally recognized
human rights, and any propaganda in favour of war or incitement to
violence and violations of the right to peace..

The UN & OIC are subjecting us to Orwellian
double speak.  Their attitude is “Justice is just for us
Muslims
.”.  “Oppressive” & “dictatorial” apply to any
government that resists Islamic conquest. Not submitting to Islam is
not only  oppression1, it is “waging war against
Allah and his Messenger”2.

Article 7 is an indirect endorsement of HAMAS
& Hezbollah, construing their genocidal3
terrorism as “legitimate resistance” while, in reality, it is offensive
conquest. The UN’s inability to define terrorism stems from the OIC’s
insistence on excluding the actions of HAMAS & Hezbollah from the
definition.

To comprehend the falsity of the Muslim narrative,
we must read the HAMAS Charter. Article 11 holds a crucial clue: conquest.
[Emphasis added.]

…because
Palestine is an Islamic Waqf throughout all generations and to the Day
of Resurrection. Who can presume to speak for all Islamic Generations
to the Day of Resurrection? This is the status [of the land] in Islamic
Shari’a, and it is similar to all
lands
conquered by Islam by
force
, and made thereby Waqf lands upon their conquest4,…

The Jews were occupied by the Byzantines, and had a
“right to resist” but their rebellion against Rome had been brutally
suppressed.  Caliph Umar conquered the region in 638 but instead
of returning the land to its rightful owners, he seized it for Islam,
extending its empire.  In 1948, the Jews were still occupied, and
retained their right to resist.  When they overthrew their British
occupiers and declared independence, the Arab League declared genocidal
conquest, which the Jews had and still retain a legitimate right to
resist.

Mortars and rockets fired into Israel are not
legitimate resistance, they are violations of the right to peace.
Morality, history and international law are being inverted right before
our eyes.  The massacre of the Fogel family was not legitimate
resistance, it was terrorism; a fundamental violation of the right to
peace.  The UN Human Rights Council is not part of the solution,
it is part of the problem.


  1. 14:15. But they (the Messengers) sought
    victory and help [from their Lord (Allâh)], and every obstinate,
    arrogant dictator (who refuses to believe in
    the Oneness of Allâh) was brought to a complete loss and destruction.
  2. 5:33. The recompense of those who wage war against Allâh and His
    Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed
    or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite
    sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this
    world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.

    `Wage war‘ mentioned here
    means, oppose and contradict,
    and it includes disbelief,
    blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. [http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//5.13751.html]
    [Emphasis added.]

  3. Sahih Muslim Book 041, Number 6985:

    Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as
    saying: The last hour would not come
    unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until
    the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or
    a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew
    behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for
    it is the tree of the Jews.

  4. 13:41. See they not
    that We gradually reduce the land (of disbelievers, by giving it to the
    believers, in war victories) from its outlying borders. And Allâh
    judges, there is none to put back His Judgement and He is Swift at
    reckoning.

 

Advertisements

September 9, 2012 - Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: