Istanbul Process: Censorship Through Subterfuge
Istanbul Process: Censorship Through Subterfuge
fall session of the Istanbul Process has concluded; while we await
publication of their report we can reflect on the manifold deceptions
which passed the lips of two participants. I have selected the
most important phrases out of context for criticism.
- Amb. Suzan Johnson Cook’s welcoming address with video:
that will advance respect for religious freedom and religious tolerance
around the world.
It is not possible to advance respect for religious
freedom & tolerance where Allah’s writ runs. There is neither
tolerance nor respect for religions other than Islam in Egypt, Saudi
Arabia and other nations dominated by Islam. The positive
attitudes desired by Amb. Cook do not and can not exist there
because of the doctrines of Islam.
- Non-Muslims are cursed.
Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it
is they on whom is the Curse
of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind, combined.
Say (O Muhammad ) to those who disbelieve: “You will be defeated and gathered
together to Hell, and worst indeed is that place to rest.”
And the Jews say:
‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians say: Messiah
is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate
the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on them, how
they are deluded away from the truth!
- Only Islam is accepted.
Truly, the religion with Allâh
Those who were given the Scripture (Jews and Christians) did not differ
except, out of mutual jealousy, after knowledge had come to them. And
whoever disbelieves in the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, signs,
revelations, etc.) of Allâh, then surely, Allâh is Swift in calling to
And whoever seeks a religion
other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the
Hereafter he will be one of the losers.
- Unbelief is a great evil under Shari’ah..
- Unbelief is the vilest
form of corruption, as goes without saying. [Reliance of the
- Leaving Islam is the
ugliest form of unbelief (kufr) and the worst. [08.0]
- …a non-Muslim has no
right to authority and hence no right to raise a Muslim. [M13.2]
divide that pits religious sensitivities against freedom of expression
For the full quote, turn to page 35 of the April ’11 Islamophobia Report.
Hillary’s assertion is malignant. Islam demands that all criticism of
Islam be squelched, which is clear in the text of previous HRC & GA
resolutions “Combating Defamation of Religions“.
Reliance of the Traveller defines apostasy with a
list of twenty acts which entail leaving Islam [O8.7]
Those acts include reviling Allah, Muhammad or Islam and denial of any
Islamic law or doctrine. The penalty for apostasy is execution,
specified in the second section of chapter 8. [O8.1]
The same rule and punishment are imposed upon conquered Jews &
Christians living in Dar ul-Islam as Dhimmis: -5- or mentions something impermissible
about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or
The penalty imposed upon a Dhimmi who blasphemes is the same as he
would suffer when captured in battle, one of four choices by the Imam,
death being the first listed. [O9.14]
The OIC demanded prosecution of the publisher of the
Motoons and demanded that the Dutch government block the publication of
Fitna. After the publication, they demanded prosecution. Egypt is
demanding that publication of Wilders’ upcoming book be blocked.
16/18 secured an international consensus around an action-oriented
approach to combat religious intolerance in line with respect for
universal human rights—including religious freedom and freedom of
“Respect for freedom of expression” yeah, right. The
following paragraph occurs on page two of the resolution:
serious instances of derogatory
profiling and stigmatization of persons based on their religion or
belief, as well as programmes
and agendas pursued by extremist organizations and groups
aimed at creating and
perpetuating negative stereotypes about religious groups, in
when condoned by Governments;
“Derogatory stereotyping ” & “negative stereotypes” are
encrypted references to associating Islam with
terrorism. Last year’s GA resolution expresses it this
terrorism, as this
may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom
or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned;
Oh, but that meme has been abandoned, hasn’t it? Yeah, right. Two
resolutions came out of the Third Committee in November, one based on
A/C.3/66/L.48/Rev.1 : “Elimination of all forms of
intolerance and of discrimination based on religion or belief”.
be equated with terrorism, as this
may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom
or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned;
Islam = terrorism because Allah said that he would
cast terror, did cast terror & Moe said that it made him
victorious. I present to you relevant, verifiable proof from the
Qur’an, Tafsir Ibn Kathir & Sahih Bukhari, the most authentic of
the six canonical hadith collections.
- 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those
- …Allah next conveys the good news that He will put fear of
Muslims, and feelings of subordination to the Muslims in the hearts of
their disbelieving enemies, because of their Kufr and Shirk. … The Prohibition of Obeying the Disbelievers; the Cause
of Defeat at Uhud
- 7:4. How many a township have We
destroyed! As a raid
by night, or while they slept at noon, Our terror came unto them.
- Our torment came upon them by
night or while they were taking their midday nap. ) means, Allah’s
command, torment and vengeance came over them at night or while taking
a nap in the middle of the day. Both of these times are periods of rest
and leisure or heedlessness and amusement. Nations that were destroyed
- 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the
angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I
will cast terror into the hearts of those
who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all
their fingers and toes.”
- …(I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have
means, `you — angels — support the believers, strengthen their
(battle) front against their enemies, thus, implementing My command to
you. I will cast
fear, disgrace and humiliation over those who defied My command and
denied My Messenger,
(so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers
toes.) strike them on their foreheads to tear them apart and over the
necks to cut them off, and cut off their limbs, hands and feet….Allah commands the Angels to fight and support the
- 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to
the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into
(the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others
besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye
shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall
not be treated unjustly.
- (to threaten), or to strike
fear, the enemy of Allah and your enemy), the disbelievers, Making Preparations for War to strike Fear in the
Hearts of the Enemies of Allah
- 33:26. And those of the people of the
Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allah brought them down
from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so
that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made
- (and cast terror into their
hearts😉 means fear, because they had
supported the idolators in their war against the Messenger of Allah and
the one who knows is not like the one who does not know. They had
terrified the Muslims and intended to kill them so as to gain earthly
power, but their plans backfired; the idolators ran away and the
believers were victorious while the disbelievers were losers; where
they had aimed for glory, they were humiliated. The Campaign against Banu Qurayzah
He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the
Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Bani An-Nadir) from their
homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get
out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from
Allah! But Allah’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they
expected it not, and He cast terror into
their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own
hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with
eyes (to see).
- …Therefore, Allah
sent His torment down on them;
it can never be averted, and His appointed destiny touched them; it can
never be resisted. The Prophet forced them to evacuate and abandon
their fortified forts that Muslims did not think they would ever
control. …Then take admonition, O you with eyes.) meaning,
“Contemplate the end of those who defied Allah’s command, contradicted
His Messenger and denied His Book. See how Allah’s humiliating torment
struck them in this life, as well as, the painful torment that Allah
has reserved for them in the Hereafter.”… The End that Bani An-Nadir suffered
- 59:13. Of a truth ye are stronger (than they)
because of the terror in their hearts, (sent) by
God. This is because they are men devoid of understanding.
- …(Verily, you
are more fearful in their breasts than Allah.)
meaning, the hypocrites fear you more than they fear Allah, as He
says; (Behold! a section of them fear men as they fear Allah or
more.)… The False Promise of Support the Hypocrites gave to the Jews
- 8:57. So if you gain the mastery over them in
war, punish them
severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they
may learn a lesson.
- …(then disperse those who are behind them,) by severely
﴿the captured people﴾ according to Ibn `Abbas, Al-Hasan Al-Basri,
Ad-Dahhak, As-Suddi, `Ata’ Al-Khurasani and Ibn `Uyaynah. This
Ayah commands punishing them harshly and inflicting casualties on them.
This way, other enemies, Arabs and non-Arabs, will be afraid and take a
lesson from their end,… Striking Hard against Those Who disbelieve and break
- Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:
Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:
The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given
to any one else before me.
1. Allah made me
victorious by awe, (by His
frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey. .
- Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the
shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror(cast
in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the
treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.”
Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you,
people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not
benefit by them).
“Programs and agendas pursued by extremist
organizations” is an encrypted reference to the Dutch and Austrian
Freedom Parties and the American Tea Party. They want to make the
Tea Party and negative expressions about Islam in campaign
advertisements illegal. If you doubt this, read the April ’11 Islamophobia Report, pages 3, 6 & 49
on states to take specific measures to combat religious intolerance
The call comes on page 2 of the resolution.
and related violence, as well as of negative stereotyping of
individuals on the basis of
religion or belief, continue to rise around the world, and condemns, in
this context, any
advocacy of religious hatred
against individuals that constitutes incitement to
discrimination, hostility or
violence, and urges
States to take effective measures, as set forth
in the present resolution, consistent
with their obligations under international human rights
law, to address and
combat such incidents;
- incidents of
- intolerance: Islamophobia
- negative stereotyping: Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of
Islam :. Muslims are terrorists.
- avocacy of religious hatred
- constitutes incitement
- violence: any & every criticism of Islam, exemplified
by Fitna, the Motoons & Qur’an burning
- effective measures: legislation and its enforcement
- consistent with their obligations under international human
rights law: International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights(ICCPR)
1. Everyone shall have the right to hold
opinions without interference
Everyone shall have the right
to freedom of expression: this right
shall include freedom to seek, receive, and impart information and
ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing
or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of this
The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and
responsibilities. It may therefore
be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such
provided by law and are necessary.
(a) For respect of the rights
or reputations of others;
(b) For the protection of
national security or of public
order (ordre public), or of public
health or morals.
1. Any propaganda for war shall be
prohibited by law
Any advocacy of national,
racial or religious hatred that constitutes
incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited
That article 20 does
not authorize or require legislation or other action by the United
States that would restrict the
right of free speech and association protected by the
Constitution and laws of the United States.
Several of the resolutions make allusion to 19.3, attempting to
stretch 19.3.a to cover Islam. Note that the U.S.A. reserved our
First Amendment right of free expression. Several resolutions
bitterly kvetch about that reservation, demanding its repeal. The HRC
has an Ad Hoc
Committee on Elaboration of Complementary Standards
whose mission is to write a binding protocol which will insert the
provisions of previous defamation of Islam resolutions into one of the
human rights covenants.
Define advocacy of hatred that constitutes
incitement. Exactly what does that expression in 20.2 mean in the real
world. For the answer, we must turn to the Secretary General.
Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban
said in a statement. “The right
of free expression is not at stake here.”
According to Ban, the short documentary by Geert Wilders meets the test
of 20.2. There is one little problem: Fitna is an exposure of
incitement, it is not incitement. I direct doubters &
dissenters to this blog post which documents Fitna’s scriptural
citations: The intention of HRC 16/18 is to criminalize Fitna, the
blog post and every criticism of Islam.
rights include the right to believe and the right practice a religion
not sanctioned by the state — or no religion at all.
Who can argue with the right to belief &
practice of religion? Islam does, and I can, too! The
existence of a right to practice Islam is an impossibility because the
practice of Islam entails genocide, terror,plunder, extortion, &
rape. This fatal fact is fully documented here:
Right to Practice Islam!
Allah said that only he has the right to be
worshiped. Get a clue.
Allâh! Lâ ilahâ illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He),
the Ever Living, the One Who sustains and protects all that
- O11.5 -6- are forbidden to openly display
wine or pork, (A: to ring
church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud,
or make public display of their
funerals and feastdays; -7- and are forbidden to build new churches.
Islam does not accept the UDHR,
it substituted the Cairo Declaration,
which makes Shari’ah the bottom line. I just quoted the relevant
Shari’ah for you. Get a clue: scroll to the end of the declaration and
read Articles 24 & 25. Its Shari’ah, stupid, refer to
Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 11.5, quoted above.
Freedom of religion is a one way street: for Muslims only.
purpose is to advance religious freedom, promote religious tolerance,
and combat discrimination on the basis of religion or belief—consistent
with universal human rights principles.
The purpose is permanently frustrated because Islam does not and will
not allow religious freedom or tolerate religions and
discriminates against indigenous religious minorities.
Those flaws are intrinsic to the core of Islam and can not be altered
or removed because Islam can not be reformed.
religious minorities and protect freedom of expression
Indigenous Christians in Egypt & Pakistan will
be charged with blasphemy and persecuted, up to and including execution
for saying “Jesus is Lord.”. HRC 16/18 does nothing to change Shari’ah
nor its implementation in Islamic nations and that is not its
intention. Its stated mission is to prevent and punish “negative
stereotyping”, which is substituted for “defamation of religions”,
which was substituted for “defamation of Islam”. A skunk by any other
name will smell as pungent. The resolution reeks, likewise the
clever words with which it is being disguised & promoted, which are
redolent of feces.
people distort various religious doctrines to justify intolerance,
foment violence, or create strife that serves their narrow political
Islam’s mission is to enrich its founder & his
successors through the professional practice of war and
extortion. I direct doubters & dissenters to a previous blog
post for the disgusting details: Islam’s Mercenary Mission.
Genocidal jihad which terrorizes its victims is an intrinsic sacrament
of Islam, not a radical innovation. I direct doubters &
dissenters to a previous blog post which exposes the disgusting
Wrong With Islam/Muslims? .
must never be a crime and religion must never be used as an excuse to
stifle freedom of expression.
“Faith without works is dead.” and faith without
content is empty. Faith ain’t the problem: doctrines are!
It is what they believe, not the fact that they believe. Faith produces
works; the works of Islam are genocidal conquest, rape, pillage &
extortion; this is why there can be No
Right to Practice Islam.
The objective of HRC 16/18 and its successor
before the GA is to criminalize and punish the publication of the facts
contained in this blog post. The OIC tried to block the publication of
Fitna. They are trying to block the publication of a new book by Geert
Wilders. They demanded that he be persecuted for Fitna.
- Remarks at the Istanbul Process for Combating Intolerance and
Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief
together to protect two fundamental freedoms – the right to practice
one’s religion freely and the right to express one’s opinion without
Hillary just told us that there is a right kill,
enslave, rape, plunder and extort disbelievers. Does she also
believe that there is a right to free expression? What did she say
about International Burn the Qur’an Day? Did she uphold Rev.
Jones’ right to express his disdain for the damnable doctrines of Islam
by burning a Qur’an? No, she condemned the planned event,
labeling it as hate speech and inciting violence, the same terms she
used to condemn the trial & burning of the Qur’an last March.
resolution marks a step forward in creating a safe global environment
for practicing and expressing one’s beliefs
it, we pledge to protect the freedom of religion for all while also
protecting freedom of expression.
There is no step toward religious freedom short of
eradicating Islam. Does Hillary plan to send the Marines to protect
Copts in Egypt? No resolution will protect them! Only
overwhelming force will prevent Muslims from killing members of
Christian minorities in Africa, Arabia & Asia. Nobody
proposes to assemble and apply that force.
Islam can only be eradicated by inducing mass
apostasy. Mass apostasy can only be induced by exposing the Ummah
to the glaring reality of the identity and attributes of Allah, the
character and works of Moe and the horrific crimes against humanity
perpetrated in Allah’s name over the last 14 centuries.
Previous resolutions demanded criminalizing
association of Islam with terrorism, an intrinsic sacrament of which
Moe bragged. Another resolution pending in the General Assembly demands
criminalizing equating Islam with terrorism.
free to practice any religion, to change our religion, or to have none
Open Reliance of the Traveller to Book O, Chapter 8
and start reading through 8.7; there is a link above. Who will go to
Pakistan and enforce the right to convert to Christianity? Will
Hillary or Ban go? Whom will they send; will they return alive
and whole from that mission? You can not change the Qur’an &
sunnah on which O8.1 is based, so, exactly what will you do about it?
are not rights bestowed by any government. They are rights endowed by
our Creator within each of us. And therefore, we have a special
obligation to protect these God-given rights.
Only the U.S. government has an obligation to
protect our rights. Res. 16/18 is part of a campaign to
eviscerate our right to free speech. Hillary’s State department is
acting in contravention of the First Amendment.
the practice of anyone’s faith is a threat to the human rights of all
Muslims believe that they have a divine right and religious
obligation to conquer
the entire world, by intimidation & force, including “casting
terror”. That right and obligation is inseverable; Islam
is all or nothing. Muslims who believe “fight in Allah’s cause, killing
others and being killed. Only
those who participate in jihad are believers. Muslims are commanded
to obey Allah and Moe. Allah commanded them to “fight
the disbelievers nearest you“. Open Sahih Bukhari 52 to see what Moe did, which is to
be emulated. Terrorism is an act of worship, intrinsic to the
practice of Islam; Muslims earn Brownie
Points for any step taken to injure or enrage disbelievers.
Hillary just informed us that preventing Muslims
from engaging in terrorism is an infringement of their human right to
the free practice of religion. Muslims can not fully practice Islam
ability to practice my religious faith freely does not, and indeed
cannot, diminish yours
Your Methodism, Hillary, does not impair the
practice of Islam. A Muslim, practicing his religion can rape and kill
you as an act of worship. Of course, that does not diminish your
rights at all, does it?
can be such a powerful bond, but we also recognize that it can be
misused to create conflict.
Creating conflict and perpetuating war are not
misuses of Islam, they are its mission. Its jihad, stupid! The “original religion” of Islam is jihad and jihad is war against non-Muslims. Allah will curse
Muslims with disgrace if they abandon jihad for trade and
are those who, for reasons actually having little to do with religion,
seek to instill fear or contempt for those of another creed.
That is an obvious sideswipe at “Islamophobes”;
those of us who expose and warn others about the damnable doctrines
& practices of Islam. Hillary implies that critics of Islam
are rousing the rabble to lynch Muslims. If that was true, we
could and should be prosecuted. In fact we are not, but far from
we believe that it is the duty of every government to ensure that
individuals are not subject to violence, discrimination, or
intimidation because of their faith or their lack of faith.
The governments of Egypt, Pakistan and other Islam
dominated nations are active, willing participants in intimidation,
discrimination & persecution of indigenous Christian minorities and
turn a blind eye to Islamic violence.
the same time, as we strive to protect individuals from violence and
discrimination because of their religion or their beliefs, we must also
express the freedom of expression.
Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of
Islam. Muslims earn Brownie Points with each act of
terrorism. 9/11 was an act of worship. The OIC seeks to
criminalize and punish the uttering and publishing of those fatal
facts. The resolution they ran through the GA last year is clear
on that matter. Res 16/18 focuses on incitement to hatred and
violence. According to Ban Ki-Moon, exposing the direct
connection between Islamic scripture, preaching and terrorism is hate
speech and incitement not protected by freedom of expression. If
he had the power, Ban would prohibit the publication of this blog post.
The purpose of Res 16/18 is to con our government into doing it for
how would one know that you were being discriminated against if you
didn’t have the right to freedom of expression?
The right of free expression is essential to
discussion of affairs of state; to political campaigns in
particular. When we perceive a real, proximate and continuing
threat to our personal and national security, we must be free to warn
our fellow citizens. When we are offended by the arrogant
exactions of enemy forces, we must be free to express our outrage and
contempt. The resolution you seek to implement is designed to
eliminate our right to free speech.
the freedom of religion and the freedom of expression are absolutely
bound up together.
My right to warn of the damnable mission, doctrines
and practices of Islam does not, in any way impair anyone’s freedom of
religion. If Muslims have a right to practice Islam, then all of
my rights are impaired. The right to live and the right to
practice Islam can not coexist because Islam is a license to kill; a
declaration of open season in denial of the right to life and
property. I direct doubters & dissenters to Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387.
there are those who have always seen a tension between these two
freedoms, especially when one person’s speech seems to question someone
else’s religious beliefs,
Open Reliance of the Traveller, the Shafi’ite
handbook of fiqh which serves as the main codification of Shari’ah, to
BookO11.10 and learn that Dhimmis can be killed for
anything “impermissible” about Allah, Moe or Islam.
maybe even offends that person’s beliefs.
the truth we have learned, through a lot of trial and error over more
than 235 years in our country, is that we defend our beliefs best by
defending free expression for everyone, and it lowers the temperature.
It creates an environment in which you are free to exercise and to
speak about your religion, whether your neighbor or someone across the
town agrees with you or not.
fact, the appropriate answer to speech that offends is more speech.
Speech that offends: “fight them until”, “fight
those who …until”, “I am commanded to fight”, “I will cast terror”,
“Allah cast terror” so that “some you killed” and others you “made
captive”. I am offended by the Qur’an, hadith, Exegesis & Shari’ah!
I am offended by shouts of “Allahu akbar!”. I am offended
by the accursed abomination 9/11 and every Islamic act of
This blog post, the hundreds of similar posts which
it and those that will follow it are my response to intolerable
evil. My disrespectful demand that Islam be outlawed, Muslims
expelled and excluded from the U.S.A. is my response to intolerable
evil. My curse that I will not vote for any candidate for high
office who does not explicitly condemn Islam is my response to
is hurtful when bigotry pollutes the public sphere,
Informed and reasoned opposition to &
denunciation of Islam, based on the facts contained in its canon of
scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence is not bigotry. The
hallmarks of bigotry are ignorance and a closed mind.
the state does not silence ideas, no matter how disagreeable they might
You just confessed, in context of Res.16/18, that
exposure & condemnation of Islam are disagreeable to you and that
you consider them to be bigotry. You also lied, because the
state, in seeking to implement 16/18, seeks to criminalize & punish
all criticism of Islam. You have, in fact, adopted
the agenda of the enemy: to silence our messages of warning and
we believe that in the end, the best way to treat offensive speech is
by people either ignoring it or combating it with good arguments and
good speech that overwhelms it.
My side has the facts, Hillary. It is not possible
to refute our condemnation of Islam because what we say is supported by
ample evidence found in Islam’s canon. You can not refute the
facts outlined in this blog post. You can lie about them, spew
ad-hominem & Tu-quoque, but you can not prevail with fact and logic
because Islam is intrinsically evil, by design and incapable of
we do speak out and condemn hateful speech.
You condemned Pastor Jones when he sponsored
International Burn the Koran Day. You condemned him when he tried
and executed the Qur’an last March. You and General Petraeus betrayed
us, blaming Jones for Muslim riots stirred up among rabid rabble by
rabid Imams at Jumah Salat. Jones did not incite violence. Jones
did not engage in hate speech. Jones did not violate anyone’s
rights. When you accused Jones of inciting violence, you did, in
fact, incite violence by encouraging Muslims to riot. I call
treason when I see it. You and Obama should be impeached,
convicted of treason and removed from office.
fact, we think it is our duty to do so,
we don’t ban it or criminalize it.
Res. 16/18 is a continuation of the string of
resolutions spawned by the OIC’s Ten year Plan. Scroll down to Art. VI,
item 3 and read about it. Read Ekmeleddin
Ihsanoglu’s speech to the HRC Session 15 and Amb. Akram’s statement
to Session 16, which is transcribed in this blog post. When we read those two
screeds and the Islamophobia Reports, the intent of the
resolution is unmistakably clear.
Fasten your seat belts, this is where the going gets
rough. Put away all fire, choke and spill hazards before you continue
with Resolution 1618, we have clarified these dual objectives.
Malignant malarkey! You clarified nothing, you
obfuscated your intention to criminalize criticism of Islam. That is
kitman as well as al-Taqiyya.
embrace the role that free expression plays in bolstering religious
No sentient person, informed of the damnable
doctrines & practices of Islam, will ever tolerate its existence!
Free expression does not bolster tolerance, it bolsters exposure and
awareness! You spoke of a one sided free expression, limited to false
praise of Islam, not extending to honest criticism.
have agreed to build a culture of understanding and acceptance
Anyone who understands Islam will never accept it!
measures to combat discrimination and violence,
Only Islam and Muslims advocate violence; we
advocate laws to expel and exclude Islam’s fifth column for the purpose
of preventing violence. Do you allow rattlesnakes to reside in your
house? Excluding rattlesnakes is discriminatory.
as education and outreach, and we are working together to achieve those
When a Muslim says “education” he means
indoctrination. Nothing exposed in the links provided in this
blog post is included in instructional materials used in our
educational system, with the exception of some doctoral programs at
large universities. Outreach translates to
one thing if people are just disagreeing. That is fair game. That’s
They say that “only Allah has the right to be
worshiped” and that I must convert or be killed. I say that I have a
right to worship or not as I blessed well see fit, without being
intimidated or coerced. They assert a duty to attack us, I assert
a right to effective national defense. They say I must be silent, I say
that I have an absolute right to expose their evil doctrines &
if it results in sectarian clashes,
Sunni & Shi’ia are rivals for power. Power
corrupts. Nothing can stop them form internecine conflict.
it results in the destruction or the defacement or the vandalization of
In Africa, Arabia, & Asia, Muslims burn down
churches, with Christians in them. That results from what is
preached in their local mosques, not what we write in our blogs.
We do not incite vandalism, a few idiots driven over the edge by
frustration act on their own free will, without anyone telling them to.
it even results in imprisonment or death,
The trial and execution of a Qur’an in Florida did
not result in death. Those deaths and property damage resulted from the
rabid preaching at Jumah Salat, not anything anyone said or did over
government must held those – hold those who are responsible accountable.
I’d like to see how you are going to hold Allah
& Moe responsible for riots & murders inspired by the Qur’an
& Sunnah. Allah is an impotent idol and Moe has been dead
since Do you think you can go to Egypt & Pakistan to
arrest, try and incarcerate the rabid Imams who rouse the rabble to
riot? I’d like to see you try it.
There is a difference between shouting fire in a
crowded theater where there is no fire or rousing a lynch mob and
burning a Qur’an. Exposing the damnable doctrines of Islam in a
blog post does not kill anyone or destroy any property. Property
is destroyed and people are killed by Muslims engaged in an act of
worship: terrorism. They don’t get their incitement from us, they
get it from Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis &
jurisprudence and from their Imams.
I have to say we have one difficulty in understanding all of the
problems that we see around the world, and that is
because religion is so personal and because it is something that we
highly value in ourselves,
No, it ain’t and anybody smarter than a Moron can
see it after a little investigation. Ignorant & indolent Morons
like you project the western concept of religion onto Islam, which it
does not fit. We view religion as a beneficent & anodyne
agency of theology & interpersonal relationships. Religions
are our source of much of our morality & ethics.
Islam is presented and accepted by Muslims as the
absolute rule of Allah, which must be obeyed in all times, at all
places. It governs every facet of human life from conception through
burial. It dictates how they eat, how they defecate and how they
wipe their butts. It also imposes upon them a demonic mandate to
conquer and subjugate the entire world. Go to Amazon.com and get
a copy of Reliance of the Traveller or Volume II of hedaya and start
reading. You can learn much from the table of contents.
Islam is not a benign, anodyne & benevolent
theology, it is a continuing criminal enterprise; a war crime against
humanity motivated by filthy lucre: “The Spoils of War“.
After reading the first verse, skip ahead to 41, then 60 & 67. Turn next to 33:26-27 and 48:15-20. Turn next to Sahih Muslim 19.4327, Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220, & 4.52.267. If, after checking those
references, you can not correctly answer the following review
questions, its time to consider suicide to protect the gene pool.
- To whom do the spoils belong?
- Who gets the top 20%?
- What was Moe’s motivation?
- What is Allah’s motivation?
[Hint: it ain’t getting Moe into his celestial bordello.]
- What was the net effect of casting terror?
- What did Allah promise Muslims?
- What is the legal status of taking spoils?
- What did Allah give Moe?
- How did Muslims invest the treasures of the Persian &
strikes us as troubling that people are not confident in their
the point where they do not fear speech that raises questions about
Muslims are hypersensitive because their faith is
false. The ruling class is in the know, it is likely that many of
the clerical class are true believers. They do not want the Ummah to
Christians have a long chain of fulfilled Jewish
prophecies to base their faith on. Muslims have only Moe’s word.
Islam begins and ends with Moe, who co-opted Jewish Prophets in hopes
of deceiving the local Jews. The trick did not work; the Jews
laughed him to scorn, recognizing the fraud.
Go to a hadith search engine such as Islamic
Network and search Sahih Bukhari for these terms, without the
quotes: “was revealed”, “inspiration” and “your wishes and desires”.
one of us who is a religious person knows that there are some who may
not support or approve of our religion.
- But is our religion so weak that
statements of disapproval will cause us to lose our faiths?
Moe was extremely sensitive to criticism, so much so
that he ordered his companions to kill several critics. One clear
example is in the hadith where we can easily find it, others
are buried in The Life of
Muhammad and Tabari’s
Tahrik. Answering Islam
has several of the relevant accounts.
would be most unfortunate. In fact, what we have found, in study after
study, is that the United States is one of the most religious countries
in the world. And yet anybody can believe anything and go anywhere.
so there is no contradiction between having strong religious beliefs
and having the freedom to exercise them and to speak about them and to
even have good debates with others.
Res. 16/18 puts some emphasis on inter-religious
dialog, assuming that it will deaden our awareness of the existential
conflict between Islam and Christianity. When Pope Benedict XVI
lectured at Regensburg, Muslims raised hell and a large number of the
Ulema wrote a missive entitled A Common Word Between Us and You. in which they
called for dialog to find “common ground”. The central concept of
the missive is drawn from Surah Al Imran 3:64.
That ayeh ends with this sentence: “Bear witness that we are Muslims”;
those are fighting words. Read the context through #112.
Those threatening words were used in Moe’s extortion letter to Heraclius.
To see how Moe conducted dialog with Christians
(demanding that they curse themselves) turn to this topic in Tafsir Ibn
Kathir: The Challenge to the Mubahalah.
the fact is that no matter how
strongly each of us believes, none of us has the benefit of knowing all
the truth that God holds in his hands.
Nobody knows for certain, but Islam asserts a claim
of certainty that it alone has a monopoly on truth and that our
religion is in error.
therefore, we are doing the
best we can here on
earth to reflect and to give honor to our creator in a way that is
manifest in our religious values. Because truly, at the root of every major religion,
is a connection with the divinity,
The root of Islam is war, not a connection with
divinity. Search the hadith for “inspiration”, you will discover
how Moe got his “revelations”: in epileptic seizures. In the first
instance, he thought that he had wrestled with the devil but his wife
convinced him that he had encountered an angel. Take another good
long look at 8:67;’
that is some connection with “divinity”.
I know that some in my country
and elsewhere have criticized this meeting and our work with
all of you.
I want to make clear that I am
proud of this work, and I am proud to be working with every one
of you. And I believe that this
work is an affirmation of America’s values, but equally
important an affirmation of
Since when is anal osculation either an American or
universal value? Lifting Satan’s tail & inserting
tongue solves nothing. Abandoning our precious, hard won right to
speak and write the truth is not an American value. American
values include life, liberty, property, pursuit of happiness and
defeating our enemies. Yielding liberty to our enemies is the polar
opposite of American values.
we nor – no country
individually has a monopoly on the truth, and we will do better
when we live in peace with each other,
In 1789 we were willing to live in peace with the
entire world but the Barbary pirates were not willing to live in peace
with us. They attacked our shipping and demanded tribute, which nearly
bankrupted the young nation. When asked by what right they attacked us,
the Algerian Ambassador replied
in terms which parallel the reply of Umar’s field commander to the
Persians in Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386. Peace
will only be possible after Islam is eliminated because Islam is permanent
we live with respect and
humility, and listen to each other. And it is important that we
recognize what we accomplished
when this resolution ended 10 years of divisive debate where people
were not listening to each other anymore.
It is abundantly clear from the recent statements of
Akram & ishanoglu, as well as the Islamophobia Reports, that
the change is purely rhetorical, a semantic game at which our side
we are. We’re talking. We have
to get past the idea that we can suppress religious minorities,
This is a terrible place to use the royal we . It is
Islam, not America that suppresses indigenous religious
minorities. There is an external ‘religious’ minority which has
infiltrated a fifth column into America with moles in high places in
defense, intelligence and security agencies. We need to expel and
exclude them. You condemn the only recourse we have a priori.
we can restrict
When you create a legal construct which ties what we
utter and publish with the completely unrelated actions of unrelated
people on other continents, completely beyond our control, assigning
blame to us for what they do on their own accord, then you are
attempting to restrict free speech by forcing self-censorship.
You are, in effect, erecting a heckler’s veto and abandoning the First
we are smart enough
that we can substitute our judgment for God’s and determine who is or
is not blaspheming.
Open Reliance of the Traveller to O8.0 and start reading, continuing through O8.7;
get a clue!
by bringing countries from around the world here,
are affirming our common
- and our common commitment to defend
and promote fundamental rights.
I doubt that any falser words were ever uttered in
the history of mankind. We are committed to defend and promote
fundamental rights, Muslims are not; Muslims are committed to the
abrogation of our rights. Islam denies the sanctity of our blood
and property, declaring that we have no rights until we become Muslims.
Those denials are contained in Moe’s declaration quoted in Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387. Projecting our own values
onto the enemy is a suicidal blunder.
can think others are wrong, but we don’t feel so insecure and so
fearful of their wrong views that we try to suppress them, imprison
them, or even kill them.
Ten years ago, 19 Muslims hijacked four passenger
aircraft and flew three of them into occupied office structures.
They shouted “Allahu akbar!” while slitting the throats of the flight
crews. Subsequently, other Muslims, acting in the name of Allah, bombed
subways in Madrid and London and seized a school in Beslan. Get a
clue! In the last 1400 years, 270*106 innocent people lost their
lives to Islam. If we do not eradicate Islam, either ideologically or militarily, they will out breed
& out last us and civilization will be destroyed.