Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Another Great Musical Spoof


Another Great Musical Spoof from Latma  has three spoofers posing as  Ahmadinejad, Erdogan & Asad  as classical singers praising terrorism.  The good stuff is sandwiched between Hebrew language news spoofs with sub titles that  flash by too swiftly.  Be patient, it is worth the wait.

The musical parody is in English, so the sub titles are redundant.  Instead of reading them, concentrate on the actor’s expressions and gestures.


June 21, 2010 Posted by | Uncategorized | , , , | Leave a comment

Why Does B.H.O. Want to Impoverish Falestinians?


The question has been asked: “Why does Barack Obama want Palestinians to live in poverty?”  It seems that working for Jews in West Bank settlements is their only legitimate source of income, yet Obama demands that the West Bank be Judenrein.  Why?

Impoverishing Falestinians is not his objective.  Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim.  The Muslim narrative is supremely Judeophobic, and he sticks to it like a leach because of his Muslim identity.   Islam was designed to appeal to Jews by co-opting their prophets and incorporating parts of their history. The grand design failed, most of the targeted Jews recognized the trap and laughed Moe to scorn.  That exacerbated the hatred which flows from the Ishmaelite  narrative.

It is the ultimate in replacement theology: Jacob screwed Ishmael out of his birthright, now his descendants demand its recovery and exclusive possession.  There is something that the ignorant majority is blissfully unaware of; I am  about to spoil your bliss by making you painfully aware of it.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 392:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

While we were in the Mosque, the Prophet came out and said, “Let us go to the Jews” We went out till we reached Bait-ul-Midras. He said to them, “If you embrace Islam, you will be safe.You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle, and I want to expel you from this land. So, if anyone amongst you owns some property, he is permitted to sell it, otherwise you should know that the Earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle.”

That saying relates directly to the settlements in the Hijaz, but it has a wider application.  Notice that “the Earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle”.  To perceive the complete picture, you need to read another saying.

Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2477
Narrated Ibn Hawalah:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: It will turn out that you will be armed troops, one is Syria, one in the Yemen and one in Iraq. Ibn Hawalah said: Choose for me, Apostle of Allah, if I reach that time. He replied: Go to Syria, for it is Allah’s chosen land, to which his best servants will be gathered but if you are unwilling, go to your Yemen, and draw water from your tanks, for Allah has on my account taken special charge of Syria and its people.

Moe said that Iraq, Syria and Yemen would be invaded and conquered. He gave the highest priority to Syria, because  “Allah has on my account taken special charge of Syria and its people”.  “Syria” refers to the Roman Province of Syria, which included the Holy Land.  We are dealing with what Germans called Judenhass.  The Qur’an has a few clues for the clueless.

98:6. Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and Prophet Muhammad ()) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.

2:91. And when it is said to them (the Jews), “Believe in what Allâh has sent down,” they say, “We believe in what was sent down to us.” And they disbelieve in that which came after it, while it is the truth confirming what is with them. Say (O Muhammad Peace be upon him to them): “Why then have you killed the Prophets of Allâh aforetime, if you indeed have been believers?”

9:30. And the Jews say: ‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on them, how they are deluded away from the truth!

7:167. And (remember) when your Lord declared that He would certainly keep on sending against them (i.e. the Jews), till the Day of Resurrection, those who would afflict them with a humiliating torment. Verily, your Lord is Quick in Retribution (for the disobedient, wicked) and certainly He is Oft­Forgiving, Most Merciful (for the obedient and those who beg Allâh’s Forgiveness).

Who is it that Allah sends to torment and humiliate the Jews?  The same people who can not swing open the gates of Paradise until they hunt down and murder the last Jew.  Because many pretend ignorance of the disgusting genocide hadith, I will quote it exhaustively in the significant variants.

Sahih  Bukhari   Volume 4, Book 56, Number 791:

Narrated ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar:

I heard Allah’s Apostle saying, “The Jews will fight with you, and you will be given victory over them so that a stone will say, ‘O Muslim! There is a Jew behind me; kill him!’ “

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 177:
Narrated Abu Huraira:

Allah’s Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. “O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.”

Sahih Muslim Book 041, Number 6981:

Ibn ‘Umar reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: You will fight against the Jews and you will kill them until even a stone would say: Come here, Muslim, there is a Jew (hiding himself behind me) ; kill him.

.Sahih Muslim Book 041, Number 6984:

Abdullah b. ‘Umar reported that Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: The Jews will fight against you and you will gain victory over them until the stone would say: Muslim, here is a Jew behind me; kill him.

Sahih Bukhari Book 041, Number 6985:

Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.

Genocidal hatred of Jews, a hatred  which transcends all other issues, even the livelihood of the Falestinians, is enshrined in the Qur’an & hadith.  The reconquest of Israel is item number one on Islam’s agenda because Israel, by recovering a tiny fragment of her ancient patrimony and governing Muslims who occupy it, proves Allah to be an impotent idol.  To Islam, Israel is the ultimate blasphemy.  He promised them victory.  He promised them a 2:1 kill ratio. He did not deliver, because he can’t.

Now that you have a clue, what  will you do?  Will you roll over and go back to sleep or will you join me in demanding that the suicidal error we made in November of ’08 be reversed?  Impeach Obama! You can read the petition on that page, which includes a link to the signature form. Please make good use of it.

June 20, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , | Leave a comment

The Persecution of Hector Aleem Will be Your Persecution


How would you feel if your loved one was incarcerated, tortured and threatened with death on trumped up charges of  “blasphemy?  What would be going through your mind if he disappeared from jail and could not be found?  How would you pay escalating legal fees?

That is the situation of the family of Hector Aleem.  Christians do not get Justice where Allah’s writ runs.  Pakistan’s blasphemy law derives moral support and legitimacy from the  annual resolutions “combating defamation of religions” passed by the General Assembly and Human Rights Council.

OIC is striving to convert those resolutions into binding international law so that we can be subjected to persecution just as Hector Aleem is.  The time for action is now, before their Ad Hoc Cmte. meets in November.  What will you do about it?  Will you sign and publicize the International Qur’an Petition?  A good counter attack is the best defense.  This is the only counter attack available to us.  If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.

The latest update from the family of Hector Aleem is reproduced below, unedited.

Mehwish Aleem June 19 at 3:07pm
Hello Everyone,

Like we have told you before that Hector Aleem has been disppeared for almost one week. But now we came to know that the terrorist organization Sunni Tehreek took him with the help of FIA (Fedral Investigation Agency) and ldged another case against him. I really dont know his physical situation because if they took him then they must have beaten him. So I will tell you his situation as soon as I get any news. we just came to know that Hector Aleem is back in jail today. We need to bring him out as soon as possible because now we are sure that he is not even safe inside the jail. And if we dont do anything fast then these kind of things can happen again. Like we told you before Sunni Tehreek is a very powerful terrorist organization in Pakistan which is against Hector Aleem.

Here is the news about Sunni Tehreek: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=602955&op=1&o=global&view=global&subj=298776303670&id=1554906133&ref=pf

You can do anything you can to bring Hector Aleem out of the prison. Those who can donate can donate through pay pal or anyother way and those who cannot donate then please just pray for us and for daddy. And those who can call, mail or email Canadian Embassy for Asylum can do that too. We would really appreciate your help, Your Moral and Practical support.

If you want to donate through pay pal then here is the link: http://tinyurl.com/hectoraleem

And if you want to donate through any other way then please contact Mohammad Shouman who is a group admin.

And also keep writing to Canadian Embassy in Islamabad for the Asylum of Hector Aleem and his family, you can write by yourself or you can print the petition, get it signed by your friends and family and send it to Canadian Embassy in Islamabad Pakistan.

Here is the link to the Petition: http://hectoraleem.blogspot.com/2010/06/write-to-canadian-embassy-in-islamabad.html

God Bless You All

Keep Praying for Hector Aleem and his family

June 19, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , | Leave a comment

Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion: Mandate Extension


The initial draft resolution on the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, tabled  June 7, consisted of three boilerplate paragraphs and an enumerated list of seven items.

A revised draft tabled June 9 consisted of four boilerplate paragraphs and an enumerated list of seven items.

A revised draft tabled June 11 by Spain for the European Union  consisted of eight proposed boiler plate paragraphs and an enumerated list of  seven items.  It appears on initial inspection that the first four paragraphs and seven enumerated items are the same as the other revised draft.  But the four new proposed paragraphs are different.

On June 14, Pakistan submitted proposed amendments on behalf of the OIC.

They would extend the Reporteur’s mandate to include:

  • Examination of incidents of incitement to religious hatred, stereotyping, etc. and recommend   remedial measures.
  • Encourage adoption of policies to ensure respect for places of worship and public expressions of belief.
  • Report on instances of violation of the right to freedom of religion.
  • Working closely with mass media to ensure the creation of an atmosphere of respect and tolerance for religions…

Resolution 14/L.5/Rev.1 Freedom of religion or belief: Mandate of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief.  This draft is expected to be voted on June 18.   It consists of four preambular paragraphs and an enumerated list of fifteen items.  Eight of these need some attention.

  1. Condemns all forms of intolerance and discrimination based on religion or belief,  as well as violations of the freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief,
  2. Stresses that everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion or belief, which includes the freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of one’s choice and the freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest one’s religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance,
  3. Condemns any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence,
  4. Deplores the overall rise in instances of intolerance and violence directed against  members of many religious and other communities in various parts of the world,
  5. Deplores also the global rise and number of incidents of religious hatred, discrimination, intolerance and violence, which may be manifested by the derogatory.   stereotyping as well as stigmatization of persons based on their religion or belief,
  6. Expresses serious concern at all attacks on religious places, sites and shrines in violation of international law, in particular human rights and humanitarian law, including  any deliberate destruction of relics and monuments,
  7. Emphasizes that, restrictions on the freedom to manifest one’s religion or belief are permitted only if limitations are prescribed by law, are necessary to protect public safety, order, health or morals, or the-fundamental rights and freedoms of others, are non-discriminatory and are applied in a manner that does not vitiate the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion,
  8. Emphasizes the important role of media in the creation and promotion of an atmosphere of respect and tolerance for religious and cultural diversity, as well as – multiculturalism,
  1. Do they really condemn dhimmitude, which subjugates conquered Christians in a sub human state of submission?  Do the really condemn violations of freedom of religion, specifically the death penalty for apostasy from Islam and non-recognition of conversions to Christianity?  I doubt it.
  2. Does that include the freedom to be totally secular, or atheist?  Does that include the right to change one’s religion from Islam to another faith?  Yeah, right.
  3. Do they really condemn the Qur’anic denunciation of Jews and Christians as the worst of living creatures and its cursing of them?  Do they really condemn its declaration of perpetual war against them?  Yeah, right.
  4. Do they really deplore the burning of churches in Kenya, Indonesia and Pakistan? Do they really deplore the mass murder of Christians and Ahmadia?
  5. It is obvious that the reference is to the Motoons and  moves to ban minarets, the hijab & niqab.
  6. And I have some beach front land to sell you in Arizona.
  7. Of course the Pact of Umar met all those criteria.  Yeah, right. Try to build a church in Egypt.
  8. The authors deserve to go to Hell.  Any delegates voting for it should go with them.  It is not possible to express my contempt & detestation for them in polite terms.
  • “important role of media: self censorship”: The HRC is demanding that the press, broadcast media and bloggers not publish anything negative about Moe’s War Cult.
  • “promotion of an atmosphere of respect and tolerance for religious and cultural diversity”:  The idea of promoting respect & tolerance for a War Cult responsible for 270*106 premature deaths in the last 1387 years is unconscionable.  Nobody with a scintilla of morality would suggest it.  No self respecting lover of liberty who knows about the doctrines & practices of Islam will accept it.

This blog post would be illegal in several  nations as it is.  Recent Combating Defamation Resolutions passed by the HRC & General Assembly would specifically outlaw the last item in the unordered list immediately above.

At the end of November, the Ad Hoc Committee on Elaboration of Complementary Standards is scheduled to meet for the purpose of drafting a protocol to ICERD would enshrine their censorship demands in  binding international law.

Islam has declared and is prosecuting war against us. We need to be free to identify and accurately describe the enemy.  Islam is striving to criminalize that which is essential to our self-defense,   We must counter attack; there is only one way to do it.  ICERD, ICCPR & CPPCG contain provisions which, enforced, would require that Islam be proscribed by law.

We must make the world, particularly the World Court, painfully aware of those provisions of international human rights law and the Islamic doctrines which violate them.  The International Qur’an Petition is our best weapon.  We must use it!  For the love of liberty, sign that petition, send its url to everyone you can influence, with an exhortation to sign and forward it.

June 18, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , | 1 Comment

Martyrdom of Hector Aleem: Why Blasphemy Laws Must Go


A son of Hector Aleem sent an update message through Facebook. I am transmitting his message to you  so that you can more fully comprehend why lovers of life and liberty must never accept Islamic blasphemy laws in any time or place, in any form, to any degree no matter how they are disguised.  I have added bold font emphasis to the message, it is otherwise unedited.

It is obvious to me that Hector Aleem has almost certainly joined the blessed martyrs waiting under the heavenly altar for divine justice. Murder: its what Islam is; what Muslims do. Simon does not want to confront that reality.  I sympathize with him, but I have no hope of a good ending.

Ignore the cloaking prose of the legislation on Pakistan’s books. Look through it to Shari’ah and witness the execrable reality of Islam, which causes reasonable men to curse it.

Chapter O8.0: Apostasy from Islam (Ridda)

(O: Leaving Islam is the ugliest form of unbelief (kufr) and the worst. It may come about through sarcasm, as when someone is told, “Trim your nails, it is sunna,” and he replies, “I would not do it even if it were,” as opposed to when some circumstance exists which exonerates him of having committed apostasy, such as when his tongue runs away with him, or when he is quoting someone, or says it out of fear.)

O8.1

When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.

O8.2

In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.

O8.3

If he is a freeman, no one besides the caliph or his representative may kill him. If someone else kills him, the killer is disciplined (def: o17) (O: for arrogating the caliph’s prerogative and encroaching upon his rights, as this is one of his duties).

O8.4

There is no indemnity for killing an apostate (O: or any expiation, since it is killing someone who deserves to die).

http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO8-2.html
There is no doubt about the penalty prescribed for apostasy.  Nor is there any doubt concerning  its definition. The list of acts and attitudes is long, I cite here those most relevant.

O8.7: Acts that Entail Leaving Islam

-4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace);

-5- to deny the existence of Allah, His beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: v1);

-6- to be sarcastic about Allah’s name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;

-7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;

-15- to hold that any of Allah’s messengers or prophets are liars, or to deny their being sent;

(n: `Ala’ al-din’ Abidin adds the following:

-16- to revile the religion of Islam;

-19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law;

-20- or to deny that Allah intended the Prophet’s message (Allah bless him and give him peace) to be the religion followed by the entire world (dis: w4.3-4) (al-Hadiyya al-`Ala’iyya (y4), 423-24). )

http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO8-7.html
That Islamic law applies to Muslims, how does it affect me?  Take another long hard look at item  20 above.  What part of that do you not comprehend: Islamic law has global applicability.  Another paragraph lists the limits on conquered Christians.  Yet another paragraph identifies acts which abrogate a Christian’s treaty of protection, subjecting him to immediate execution.  Five items are listed, one is relevant.

O11.10

The agreement is also violated (A: with respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway, though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement, then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:

-5- or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.
http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO11-10.html
The OIC has pushed through resolutions condemning “defamation of Islam” every year since ’05.  Now they are campaigning to make those resolutions legally binding on U.N. member states.  The Ad Hoc Cmte. meets again at the end of November.  Very few people are aware of this threat to our lives & liberties.  Only a few organizations such as Art. 19 & IHEU are publicizing it.  Almost nobody is paying attention.

The linkage between Islamic genocide and Islamic scripture is direct and immediate.  I have pointed that out in numerous blog posts. In Australia,  Great  Britain, Denmark and Finland I could be fined and imprisoned for that revelation.  Thank God and the Founding Fathers, America has the First Amendment.  But not for long.  Soon, we shall be led dumb, like lambs to the slaughter.

I want you to do something about it.  I want you to sign  the International Qur’an Petition, send its url to everyone in your email address book and exhort them to sign and forward it.

International Qur’an Petition

This is what will happen to us eventually if you don’t take action now.
Simon Yaqoob Aleem June 17 at 12:30pm
It is to inform you all that Hector Aleem has been disappeared suddenly from Jail. We can’t find him anywhere. When our lawyer sent legal papers in jail to get them signed by Hector Aleem then the Jail authorities told that Hector Aleem is NOT in jail and some agencies took him somewhere. We are trying for three days to confirm that where is daddy but no one is able to tell us anything. Our lawyer has searched him in each and every Police Station of Rawalpindi/Islamabad but we couldn’t find him anywhere. Three days have passed now and we still don’t have any clue about daddy. We don’t know if he is being tortured somewhere or being kidnapped. Even Jail authorities can’t tell where he is now. They just say, “Some agencies took him”. But they don’t tell us that where he is and who took him? Please pray for him and tell your friends and family to pray for daddy. If you got your blogs then please publish it in your blogs, and if your friends got any kind of blog then please tell them to publish this news. This is not fair that daddy is not even safe inside the jail, and we don’t know where he is now.

Please keep on donating for Hector Aleem’s lawyer, his legal expenses and his food and clothes. You can donate through Pay Pal or you can donate through any other way.

If you want to donate through pay pal then here is the link: http://tinyurl.com/hectoraleem

And if you want to donate through any other way then please contact Mohammad Shouman who is a group admin.

And also keep writing to Canadian Embassy in Islamabad for the Asylum of Hector Aleem and his family, you can write by yourself or you can print the petition, get it signed by your friends and family and send it to Canadian Embassy in Islamabad Pakistan.

Here is the link to the Petition: http://hectoraleem.blogspot.com/2010/06/write-to-canadian-embassy-in-islamabad.html

Please keep praying for Hector Aleem, This is a very tense situation for us.

June 17, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , , | 2 Comments

Joe Lieberman Spews Excrement!


An  email from Newsmax  contained this link Lieberman Slams Obama on Radical Islam Silence which contained a few provocative quotes but no link to the source.  They did mention that their source was an op ed piece at the Wall Street Journal.  Google came to my rescue.

Throughout this blog post, blue, underlined text is hyperlinked to a source document. Clicking any link will open the source in a new window.  Through some of those links you can gain access to the Qur’an & hadith which form the core of Islam.

Who’s the Enemy in the War on Terror?

I do not know who supplied the head & sub head, but I will  begin my criticism there because the head & sub head contain egregious deceptions which deserve to be exposed.

“War on Terror”  implies that  terror is the enemy.  In reality, terror is a psychological and physiological state in which the mind and body are so agitated that immediate effective defense becomes impossible.  The heart races and palpitates, the hands and knees shake, and the mind is filled with a forboding of doom and despair.  Flight takes precedence to fight when terror reigns.

Terror is a condition, instilling terror is an enemy tactic. Identify the entity which uses that tactic and you have identified the enemy.  I am about to perform an act most bloggers, commentators, news media and politicians will not do.  I am about to bore you with the most vital facts which will enable you to identify the enemy who is waging war against us.

The following quotation is from the bottom of  page 58 of The Qur’anic Concept of War, a strategic training manual written by Brig. S.K. Malik for the  army of Pakistan.

Terror struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only a means, it is the end in itself. Once a condition of terror into
the opponenfs heart is obtained, hardly anything is left to be achieved. It is the point where the means and the end meet
and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon the enemy; it is me decinbn we wish to impose upon him.

Inflicting terror is both a means and an end which makes victory possible. No, Pakistan is not the enemy; don’t jump to conclusions. Look at the title of the book.  What is the origin of the tactical use of terror?  If you answered “the Qur’an”, you are beginning to catch on.  If not, I suggest that you take a remedial reading course to improve your comprehension skills.

The Qur’an is the scripture of Islam, its guide to all aspects of life including warfare.    Allah said that he would cast terror into the hearts of disbelievers. That statement is found in 3:151 and 8:12. In the latter verse, he told the angels and the Muslims what to do to cast terror.  In 8:57, he commanded Muslims to inflict a severe defeat on their victims in order to affect the psychology of future victims; to terrify them.   In 8:60, he commanded the Muslims to maximize the power of their army so as to terrify their enemies.

Allah said that he cast terror, resulting in victory for the Muslims.  In 33:26-27, we learn that Allah’s casting of terror resulted in the killing of the men of one tribe and the enslavement of their widows and orphans. It also resulted in the seizeure of their  real and personal property.  In 59:2 we learn that casting terror resulted in the defeat of another tribe who destroyed their own homes. At the conclusion of the latter verse, we find something special. “Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).” As hinted in 8:57, Allah is setting up the destruction of one set of victims as an example to instill terror in future victims.

The Qur’anic sanctification of terrorism might be dismissed as metaphorical or apocryphal but for the ample confirmations found in hadith, the oral traditions of Moe’s companions on the battlefield.  Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 lists five special gifts that distinguish Moe from other Prophets. The first of those five items is most instructive: “Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.”.     Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220 tells us how Moe was made victorious: “…I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), …”.

The tactic  of casting terror is sanctified by the Qur’an and exemplifed by  hadith.  Now we know who owns it: Islam.  That is standard, off the shelf, orthdox, mainstream Islam, not some imaginary “radical”, “extremist” or “fundamentalist” sub set or offshoot.

Perpetual warfare is another sacrament of Islam, mandated by 2:216 and commanded in 8:39, 9:29 and 9:123. The imperative is confirmed in Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387.  The perpetual duration of jihad is confirmed in Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2526.

Attacks on us, threatened and performed by Muslims, flow directly from the venomous verses of the Qur’an & Hadith.  The identity of the enemy is no mystery; it is Islam.

The U.S. is at war with violent Islamist extremism, and the Obama administration does moderate Muslims no favor by refusing to recognize this.

The sub head, reproduced above, contains two egregious lies, disguised by code words: “violent Islamist extremism” & “moderate Muslims”.  I already proved the fact that offensive jihad using terrorism as a tactic is an intrinsic sacrament of  Islam as Moe preached and practiced it.  Muslims who reject the sacrament of offensive jihad are not moderates, they are hypocrites.  That term is used in 18 of the 114 Surahs. 3:156 denounces them as cowards.   In 9:38, Allah threatens the hypocrites with hell fire for refusing to join the jihad.  in 9:68 he converts the threat into a promise.

In his  opening paragraphs, Senator Lieberman compares the current National Security Strategy, which does not identify Islam as the enemy, to the 2006 ecition. Here is the money quote: “It correctly identified our enemy as “the transnational terrorists [who] exploit the proud religion of Islam to serve a violent political vision.” “.    We need to  identify the most egregious lie in that quote, it is contained in this clause: “exploit the proud religion of Islam to serve a violent political vision’.  Islam is a violent political vision!  I gave you links to the jihad imperatives and a hadith which confirms  them.  That is standard mainstream Islam, not bi’da.

The third paragraph contains a repetition of the big lie: “violent Islamist extremism”.  Islam is intrinsically violent. Muslims engaged in terroristic jihad are obeying Allah and emulating their profit. They are zealots; believers [8:2, 49:15 ], not extremists.

Senator Lieberman correctly identifies the weakness in identifying al-Qaeda as the enemy, but in the process, he repeats the big lie.

First, it is not fully accurate. Defining the enemy by reference to al Qaeda implies that this war is primarily about destroying an organization, rather than defeating a broader political ideology. This war will not end when al Qaeda has been vanquished—though that, of course, is a critical goal—but only when the ideology of violent Islamist extremism that inspires and predates it is decisively rejected. That ideology motivates many other groups and individuals.

I added bold face emphasis to the critical clause and red font color & italics to the big lie.  The quote would be true if Islam were substituted for the big lie.

Lieberman seems to make a habit of skirting close to the edge of truth without crossing over from the lie.  I will add emphasis to this quote to make the lies stand out for you.

Finally, characterizing this war as being against a specific organization risks distracting our government from important policy questions about how to combat the ideological dimensions of the war that is taking place within Islam. It also may send a message to moderate Muslims that they can and should remain on the sidelines of this fight, while governments use conventional means to defeat al Qaeda.

A specific organization is waging war against us: Islam. Senator Lieberman, like most politicians, won’t acknowledge that fact,  though it is obvious that he  is aware of it.

Senator Lieberman swerved near to the truth before quickly counter steering: ideological dimensions.  The ideas that Allah is the deity, that he mandates global conquest, that Islam must be made to dominate the world are central to this war.  This war can not be won without breaking the Muslim’s faith.   One man leads the way: Father Zakaria Botros; follow his lead!!! It all rests on one man’s image: Moe.  We must make Muslims aware of his true charactr and conduct. Fr. Botros knows how to do that, and he does it. We must scale up his mission.

The other big lie: war taking place within Islam.  Hypocrites are not fighting. They are not armed. They are not motivated to take militant action. They are intimidated; they will be easily killed by believers.  The believing salafists have the texts on their side; hypocrites nave nothing with which to argue against believers.  The hypocrites have no viable option unless they unite, arm themselves, kill the believers and apostatize.

Al-Qaeda and Islam are one.  Islam can not be defeated conventionally  short of complete extermination.  Is anyone willing to do that?  If not, then we must defeat Islam ideologically.

Just when I start to think that Senator Lieberman might be redeemable, he comes up with  another restatement of the big lie.

Muslims in fact understand better than anyone else the enormous difference between their faith and the terrorist political ideology that has exploited it.

Islam is a way of life: intra-species predation.  What did Allah say?  What did Moe do?  Get a clue!

It appears from the next  quote that Senator Lieberman may be living in fantasy land.

We must encourage and empower the non-violent Muslim majority to raise their voices to condemn the Islamist extremist ideology as a desecration of Islam, responsible for the murder of tens of thousands of innocent Muslims and people of other faiths. How can we expect those Muslims to have the courage to stand and do that if we are unwilling to define and describe the enemy as dramatically different from them?

Islam is the enemy, of the hypocrites as much as us. Allah lumps them in with us, to be killed and gathered into Hell.  Muslims are the enemy; they are not different from the enemy, they are part of it.   Islam is what Moe preached and practiced; Muslims are believers in what Moe preached, who attempt to emulate his works.  Moe’s preaching & example are not moderate, they are not peaceful and anodyne.

There is no end to ignorance & insanity.

We must recognize the nature of the fight we are in, not paper it over. The United States is definitely not at war with Islam. But a group of self-identified, extremist Muslims has definitely declared war on us, a war which they explicitly justify by reference to their religion. Muslims across the world see the ideological nature of this struggle. I believe it is disrespectful to suggest they cannot understand these distinctions and act on them.

The first sentence of that quote is entirely true. It is papered over  by the traitors who mislead us, including Senator Leiberman, because, from their viewpoint, recognizing the enemy would require making the enemy extinct, which they foolishly equate with genocide.  Doing to the enemy what they are trying to do to you does not lower you to their level, it leaves you alive and more secure.  “Never Again!” refers to the murder of innocents, not to the extermination of predators.

The second sentence is also true. We should be at war against Islam, a declared war, as provide for by the Constitution, but we fail to identify and recognize the enemy.

Usama bin Laden’s declaration of war against us is not the first.  The first Islamic declaration of of war against us was not specific, it was generic and global. It is contained in 8:39 & 9:29, which are codifed in Shar’iah as Book O, Chapter 9.8 & 9.9 of Reliance of the Traveller.  Sentient people will read them and curse Islam.

When Caliph Umar sent his army to Persia, his general made a statement you need to know about. It is found in Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386.

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”

Compare the quote above to the response given to Adams & Jefferson when they asked by what right the Barbary Pirates attacked our shipping.  The quote comes from Wikipedia.

The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven. [3]

The “ideological nature of this struggle” boils down to: Allah’s exclusive right to be worshipped, Allah’s exclusive right to rule and the Muslim’s obligation to enforce them.   If you can’t comprehend that, Senator, then step down; you are not intelligent enough to be a legislator.  If you can not acknowledge the truth, Senator, then step down; you are not honest and courageous enough to be a legislator.

The real disrespect is underestimating the intelligence of the American electorate, urinating  on our shoes and swearing that it is raining.  We know the difference.  A growing number of Americans are wising up to the fact that Islam is the enemy and terrorism is motivated by its intrinsic doctrines, not be your mythical extremism.

June 16, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , | Leave a comment

Anti-Muslim Bigotry


A new post at Barenaked Islam pointed to two articles accusing Islam’s opponents of bigotry.

Michelle Boorstein asks at the Washington Post: How influential will anti-Muslim groups become?

For years there has been a small but passionate group of people concerned with the influence of Islam, and their activism seemed to be largely focused on blogging and lobbying political conservatives. But their presence — and the arguments they raise — seem to be coming into the broader sphere of late.
The author cites the controversy over the Cordoba House project and  Paypal’s censorship of Atlas Shrugs.  The Salon article she links to shouts “racially-motivated hatred” in its headline.

The entire anti-mosque campaign isn’t about anything other than pure, paranoid Islamophobia.
The article closes with a short story about two Arab Christians who were allegedly driven away from a recent protest of Cordoba House in N.Y.C.  Atlas Shrugs posted a communication from one of the Arab Cristians involved in that incident. Here is one paragraph from  that communication.

The reason I am writing to you, is because I am very disappointed in the mainstream media who used this minor incident to make a blanket generalization about all the attendees of the rally as Muslim haters.This kind of generalization was unfair to the good American people who legitimately stand against the building of a mosque next to ground zero and who are against Islamist agenda in the US. I am very well aware of such an agenda which has destroyed the Christian and Jewish existence in the Middle East.
Now you know what theose smug, smarmy left wingers are doing to pull the woll over your eyes.

The REAL News Network posted a video of two academics making the usual smarmy, self-righteous denunciation of “bigotry”. Note their loaded title:

How Western anti-Muslim bigotry became respectable.

According to them, the Islamic  conquest and occupation of  Southern & Eastern Europe was the greatest thing before sliced bread.  It produced a wonderful culture of architecture, infrastructure and academia.  They don’t give a damn about the slaugher, enslavement or burning of churches and monestaries.  Oh, no, those are minor, inconsequential incidents.

According to the Socialist narrative, all opposition to Islam is bigotry; Islamophobia.  It is evidence of paranoia.  Their narrative is false and malignant.  An estimated 270*106 people were slaughtered by Islam since 622. The slaughter of Hundus and the Armenian & Assyrian genocides flow directly from the foundational texts of Islam.

Genocide

Allah’s divine word includes these gems of genocidal bestiality.  Denial is not a river in Egypt. You can not disprove objective factual reality.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

47:4. So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom), or ransom (according to what benefits Islâm), until the war lays down its burden. Thus [you are ordered by Allâh to continue in carrying out Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm (i.e. are saved from the punishment in the Hell-fire) or at least come under your protection], but if it had been Allâh’s Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allâh, He will never let their deeds be lost,
The differential desires of Moe and Allah are clear from the phrases which I emphasized with bold font.  Moe wanted ransom, Allah wants great slaughter, killed and wounded many of them.  I linked the Surah:ayeh numbers to a table of ten parallel translations so that you can verify the obvious meaning of the quotes.

Of course, it could not possibly mean that, could it.  No, those verses must be metaphorical or allegorical.  Yeah, right. Ibn Kathir explained them in
The Command to strike the Enemies’ Necks, tighten Their Bonds, and then free Them either by an Act of Grace or for a Ransom.

(until you have fully defeated them,) meaning, `you have killed and utterly destroyed them.’
It appears that this Ayah was revealed after the battle of Badr. At that time, Allah reproached the believers for sparing many of the enemy’s soldiers, and holding too many captives in order to take ransom from them.
Surely those are anachronisms, long since expired.  Yeah, right.

(There will always be a group of my Ummah victorious upon the truth, until the last of them fight against Ad-Dajjal.)
jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist).  Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2526
So, where is my proof?  My proof is in another hadith  collected by Abu Dawud. Read it carefully, paying particular attention to the parts I emphasized.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 38, Number 4390:
Narrated Atiyyah al-Qurazi:
I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those who had not grown hair.

Had Atiyya reached puberty, he would have been slaughtered, he would not have survived to narrate that saying.  When the Banu Qurayzah surrendered, Moe had their men and adolescent boys slaughtered.  The estimates run between 700 and 900 decapitations in that incident.   And they are not finished yet. Muslims can not open the gates of Paradise until they complete the genocide of the Jews.

Sahih Muslim Book 041, Number 6985:
Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.
Genocide is not only a divine imperative, it is sunah, an example for future genrations of Muslims to emulate.  Now let us examine the consequence of the codification of that divine imperative and  exemplary conduct.  I quote from CPPCG.

Article 3

    The following acts shall be punishable:

    (a) Genocide;

    (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;

    (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;

    (d ) Attempt to commit genocide;

    (e) Complicity in genocide.

Article 3(c) of the Convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide requires that Islam be proscribed by law.  Other standing violations of international human rights covenants which require the proscription of Islam are documented in  Islam vs Human Rights.

Islam is intolerant; 3:85.  And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers. In 9:29, it declares perpetual war on Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians.

The current contrempts center around Ground Zero, where Muslims seek to erect a Mosque in the Burlignton Coat Factory outlet, as a symbol of superiority.  There is a little secret most Amaericans are unaware of.  Islamic law forbids conquered Christians from building or maintianing churches.  The quote is from a list of seven restrictions on dhimmis found in Reliance of the Traveller, Book O11.5.

-7- and are forbidden to build new churches.  http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO11-5.html
We have ample cause for objecting to Islam’s violence, supremacism, intolerance, terrorism & genocide.  Our objection is not bigotry nor is it racism; Islam is a  predatory way of life, not a race.

June 14, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , | Leave a comment

Atlas Shrugs Hassled by Paypal


Paypal has threatened to cut off Atlas Shrugs and related sites for “hate speech”, while  continuing to allow Islamic hate sites to collect donations through their service.

The link above  displays an  email Pamela Geller received from Paypal plus links to genuine hate sites that use Paypal.  This is not a First Amendment issue, it is private, not governmental.  It is safe to assume that Paypal received complaints from Muslims, who agitated for cutting off Geller’s service.  This is a matter of intimidation tactics and corporate hypocrisy, not a matter of federal law.

Revealing the objective truth about Islamic doctrine & practice is not hate speech.  Geller is not urging her readers to vandalize Mosques nor assault Muslims.  Neither are advertisements offering information and assistance to apostates hate speech.

Here is a direct link to Geller’s blog, read it and judge for yourself:  http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/ .

June 14, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , | Leave a comment

Why Did You Vote for Obama?


Most of the information about Barack Hussein Obama contained in this video was known and publicized prior to the  election. If you knew about it, why did you vote for the Mekkan candidate?

Did he promise you something you desperately wanted?  Did he fulfill that promise?  Is there any remote possibility of fulfilling that promise?  Is fulfilling that promise  lawful under the Constitution?

Did you swoon over his looks?  Or was it his slickly delivered, ambiguous rhetoric?  Is either of those factors a good basis for choosing a President?  “Hope and change”, how is that working out for you now?    Were you just running over the cliff with the lemmings?

If you answered  yes to any of those questions,  you should burn your voter registration card because you are part of the problem, not part of the solution;  too stupid and irrational to participate in selecting  our nation’s leadership.  Please provide your explanation in  a comment.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHxb_vZe7Ao

June 14, 2010 Posted by | Politics | | Leave a comment

Reject Cordoba House!


In this video, David Wood reveals some things we need to know.  He quotes the Qur’an 3:28 and Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir which you should  verify for yourself.

Historical references such as the Church of St. John in Damascus being replaced  by a Mosque are more  difficult to track down. But visit this Catholic Encyclopedia article and scroll down to  Fall of Constantinople, to the second half of the second paragraph, where we find this.

Most of the churches, like In this video, David Wood reveals some things we need to know.  He quotes the Qur’an 3:28 and Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir which you should  verify for yourself.

Historical references such as the Church of St. John in Damascus being replaced  by a Mosque are more  difficult to track down. But visit this Catholic Encyclopedia article and scroll down to  Fall of Constantinople, to the second half of the second paragraph, where we find this.

Most of the churches, like St. Sophia, were gradually converted into mosques. This was the fate of SS. Sergius and Bacchus — a beautiful monument built by Justinian, commonly called “the little St. Sophia”; of the church of the monastery of Khora, whose splendid mosaics and pictures, mostly of the fourteenth century, are among the principal curiosities of the city; of the churches of the celebrated Pantocrator and Studium monasteries, etc. Other churches were demolished and replaced by various buildings; thus the church of the Holy Apostles gave way to the great mosque built by the conquering Sultan Mohammed II. The imperial tombs in this church were violated; some of their gigantic red porphyry sarcophagi were taken to the church of St. Irene. The latter is the only church taken from the Greeks that has not been changed into a mosque or demolished; it became, and is yet an arsenal, or rather a museum of ancient weapons.

Further confirmation is found in this WikiIslam article, which quotes Robert Spencer from Front Page Magazine.

After a period of Byzantine resurgence, in 1004, the sixth Fatimid Caliph, Abu ‘Ali al-Mansur al-Hakim (985-1021) turned violently against the faith of his Christian mother and uncles (two of whom were Patriarchs) and ordered the destruction of churches, the burning of crosses, and the seizure of church property. He moved against the Jews with similar ferocity. Over the next ten years thirty thousand churches were destroyed, and untold numbers of Christians converted to Islam simply to save their lives. In 1009, al-Hakim gave his most spectacular anti-Christian order: he commanded that the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem be destroyed, along with several other churches (including the Church of the Resurrection). The Church of the Holy Sepulcher, rebuilt by the Byzantines in the seventh century after the Persians burned an earlier version, marks the traditional site of Christ’s burial. Bizarrely, the church had served as the model for the Al-Aqsa Mosque. The Caliph al-Hakim commanded that the tomb inside be cut down to the bedrock. He ordered Christians to wear heavy crosses around their necks (and Jews heavy blocks of wood in the shape of a calf). He piled on other humiliating decrees, culminating in the order that they accept Islam or leave his dominions.

Yet further confirmation is found in the Arab Occupation of Sicily article at WikiIslam.

Once the Arabs overran Sicily they set about the Islamification of Sicily through the destruction of churches and ertection of Mosques over the sites, they changed the composition of the population with the hundreds of thousand of Muslim immigrants who destroyed a civilization that had lasted from the 8th century before Christ had contributed to the creation of the identity of the West.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxFzFIDbKpg&feature=player_embedded

Muslims kill, conquer and  supplant churches with Mosques as a sign of supremacy.  Why in Hell should we tolerate that?  For what good reason should we tolerate the erection of an Islamic symbol of supremacism two blocks from the ruins of the World Trade Center?

Would construction of a Synagogue  near the Mosque shot up by Baruch Goldstein contribute to reconciliation and mutual understanding between Jews and Muslims?   Would the construction of a Cathedral at the Burlington Coat Factory  contribute to reconciliation & mutual understanding?  How then will a Mosque be of any such benefit?   We are being fed irrational slogans instead of logical answers.

It is time to wake up, wise up, rise up and shout: “No more Mosques!!”.

Thanks and a tip of the hat  to CitizenWarrior, who wants us to make this video go viral.

St. Sophia, were gradually converted into mosques. This was the fate of SS. Sergius and Bacchus — a beautiful monument built by Justinian, commonly called “the little St. Sophia”; of the church of the monastery of Khora, whose splendid mosaics and pictures, mostly of the fourteenth century, are among the principal curiosities of the city; of the churches of the celebrated Pantocrator and Studium monasteries, etc. Other churches were demolished and replaced by various buildings; thus the church of the Holy Apostles gave way to the great mosque built by the conquering Sultan Mohammed II. The imperial tombs in this church were violated; some of their gigantic red porphyry sarcophagi were taken to the church of St. Irene. The latter is the only church taken from the Greeks that has not been changed into a mosque or demolished; it became, and is yet an arsenal, or rather a museum of ancient weapons.

Further confirmation is found in this WikiIslam article, which quotes Robert Spencer from Front Page Magazine.

After a period of Byzantine resurgence, in 1004, the sixth Fatimid Caliph, Abu ‘Ali al-Mansur al-Hakim (985-1021) turned violently against the faith of his Christian mother and uncles (two of whom were Patriarchs) and ordered the destruction of churches, the burning of crosses, and the seizure of church property. He moved against the Jews with similar ferocity. Over the next ten years thirty thousand churches were destroyed, and untold numbers of Christians converted to Islam simply to save their lives. In 1009, al-Hakim gave his most spectacular anti-Christian order: he commanded that the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem be destroyed, along with several other churches (including the Church of the Resurrection). The Church of the Holy Sepulcher, rebuilt by the Byzantines in the seventh century after the Persians burned an earlier version, marks the traditional site of Christ’s burial. Bizarrely, the church had served as the model for the Al-Aqsa Mosque. The Caliph al-Hakim commanded that the tomb inside be cut down to the bedrock. He ordered Christians to wear heavy crosses around their necks (and Jews heavy blocks of wood in the shape of a calf). He piled on other humiliating decrees, culminating in the order that they accept Islam or leave his dominions.

Yet further confirmation is found in the Arab Occupation of Sicily article at WikiIslam.

Once the Arabs overran Sicily they set about the Islamification of Sicily through the destruction of churches and ertection of Mosques over the sites, they changed the composition of the population with the hundreds of thousand of Muslim immigrants who destroyed a civilization that had lasted from the 8th century before Christ had contributed to the creation of the identity of the West.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxFzFIDbKpg&feature=player_embedded

Muslims kill, conquer and  supplant churches with Mosques as a sign of supremacy.  Why in Hell should we tolerate that?  For what good reason should we tolerate the erection of an Islamic symbol of supremacism two blocks from the ruins of the World Trade Center?

Would construction of a Synagogue  near the Mosque shot up by Baruch Goldstein contribute to reconciliation and mutual understanding between Jews and Muslims?   Would the construction of a Cathedral at the Burlington Coat Factory  contribute to reconciliation & mutual understanding?  How then will a Mosque be of any such benefit?   We are being fed irrational slogans instead of logical answers.

It is time to wake up, wise up, rise up and shout: “No more Mosques!!”.

Thanks and a tip of the hat  to CitizenWarrior, who wants us to make this video go viral.

June 14, 2010 Posted by | Islam | , , | Leave a comment

%d bloggers like this: