Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Obamination: Flight 253 Revisited

The White House Blog has links  related to the attempted bombing of Flight 253.

In summarizing his national security review, President  Barack Hussein Obama trotted out his standard litany of lies.  Because those lies must be identified and refuted, I will  present them in block quote format interspersed with my commentary.

And finally, I’m ordering an immediate effort to strengthen the criteria used to add individuals to our terrorist watchlists, especially the “no fly” list.  We must do better in keeping dangerous people off airplanes, while still facilitating air travel.

Occam’s Razor and the KISS rule apply to this  issue; only one criterion is required.  The no-fly list should consist of the set of persons who profess Islam. Everyone who believes that he has a divine right and duty to conquer & dominate the world or to  anger or injure kuffar is dangerous. Anyone whose relationship to his deity is  that of hired killer is dangerous. Anyone to whom our blood is not sacred is dangerous.

At the Amsterdam airport, Abdulmutallab was subjected to the same screening as other passengers.  He was required to show his documents — including a valid U.S. visa.  His carry-on bag was X-rayed.  He passed through a metal detector.  But a metal detector can’t detect the kind of explosives that were sewn into his clothes.

How do you hope to detect explosives swallowed, inserted or  surgically implanted?  Are you going to install MRI  scanners in every airport and run every passenger through them?  How much would that cost and how long would it take?

Over the past two weeks, we’ve been reminded again of the challenge we face in protecting our country against a foe that is bent on our destruction.  And while passions and politics can often obscure the hard work before us, let’s be clear about what this moment demands.  We are at war.  We are at war against al Qaeda, a far-reaching network of violence and hatred that attacked us on 9/11, that killed nearly 3,000 innocent people, and that is plotting to strike us again.  And we will do whatever it takes to defeat them.

You  failed to identify the enemy, which is Islam. Al-Qaeda is an offshoot of al-Ikhwan al-Muslimeen, which is Islam.  There are only two ways to defeat Islam, and you are not willing to engage in either of them. Islam’s war against  the human race will end when all the Muslims are apostates, converts or dead.  Our defeat and death is the other possibility. Which  do you prefer?

Either Muslims cease believing / living  or we will suffer continual attacks and eventual conquest. Will you launch an intensive, extensive & prolonged  ideological attack against Islam, exposing Allah as the ultimate evil, Muhammad as a pederast, murderer & genocidal warlord and  the Qur’an as  inculcation of hatred & incitement to war?  If not, then  how will you kill them all?

And we know that the vast majority of Muslims reject al Qaeda.  But it is clear that al Qaeda increasingly seeks to recruit individuals without known terrorist affiliations not just in the Middle East, but in Africa and other places, to do their bidding.  That’s why I’ve directed my national security team to develop a strategy that addresses the unique challenges posed by lone recruits.  And that’s why we must communicate clearly to Muslims around the world that al Qaeda offers nothing except a bankrupt vision of misery and death –- including the murder of fellow Muslims –- while the United States stands with those who seek justice and progress.

How do you :know” that “the vast majority of Muslims reject al-Qaeda”?  Did you conduct a scientific opinion survey?  Every Muslim has a terrorist affiliation! Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam; 3:151, 8:12, 8:57, 8:60, 33:26, 59:2, 59:13 & Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220 make that fact  crystal clear.

It is Islam that offers  the bankrupt vision of misery and death in this world, and a carnal garden with rivers  of water, honey, milk  & wine and trees full of  low hanging fruit always in season with perpetual virgins in the next. To obtain admission to the celestial carnal garden, Muslims must participate in killing and conquering us. To Muslims, world conquest is justice & progress.

To advance that progress, we’ve sought new beginnings with Muslim communities around the world, one in which we engage on the basis of mutual interest and mutual respect, and work together to fulfill the aspirations that all people share — to get an education, to work with dignity, to live in peace and security.  That’s what America believes in.  That’s the vision that is far more powerful than the hatred of these violent extremists.

How is appeasement a new beginning?  There is no mutual interest nor mutual respect. Islam is interested only in conquering us and they do not respect us, to  Islam, we rank with corpses and feces.

Muslims do not share your aspirations. They look not to the life of this world, but to the next, where they will enjoy the gardens or suffer in the fire. Participation in Jihad to conquer us determines where they will spend eternity.

The shibboleth: violent extremists implies that Islam is peaceful; that violence is the exception, not the rule. Nothing can be further from the truth. Muslims are purchased by Allah for the purpose of doing his wet work. This fact is documented in Surah at-Taubah 111. Allah’s wet work is world conquest, commanded in Surah al-Anfal 39 & Surah at-Taubah 29. Those  Jihad imperatives are codified in Shari’ah, Book O, Chapter 9, ¶ 8 & 9 of Reliance of the Traveller. Search for o9.8.  Jihad is the “original religion” of Islam; If Muslims abandon it in favor of agriculture as a way of life, they will be cursed with disgrace prevailing over them until they return to Jihad.  If you have any doubts about the meaning of Jihad (making war on disbelievers) open  Reliance of the Traveller to o9.0 and read it carefully. Compare that text to the definition provided in the translator’s footnote to Surah al-Baqarah 190.

Here at home, we will strengthen our defenses, but we will not succumb to a siege mentality that sacrifices the open society and liberties and values that we cherish as Americans, because great and proud nations don’t hunker down and hide behind walls of suspicion and mistrust.  That is exactly what our adversaries want, and so long as I am President, we will never hand them that victory.  We will define the character of our country, not some band of small men intent on killing innocent men, women and children.

It is not possible to win a war defensively. Winning requires taking the offense, destroying enemy assets and killing enemy combatants until the enemy is so devastated that they lose the will to fight.  Islam will never lose the will to fight. Promotion and perpetuation of war is Islam’s purpose, because Moe designed it for that purpose. Moe got his income through accrual of spoils and tribute. Continuous war was the source of his cash flow.  If you doubt the facts exposed in this paragraph, read these resources carefully: Islam’s Mercenary Mission, Jihad.chm, Islamic Supremacism.   Avoidance of suspicion, distrust & paranoia requires removing Islam’s fifth column from our midst.  Western Civilization must be made a Muslim free zone.

And in this cause, every one of us — every American, every elected official — can do our part.  Instead of giving into cynicism and division, let’s move forward with the confidence and optimism and unity that defines us as a people.  For now is not a time for partisanship, it’s a time for citizenship — a time to come together and work together with the seriousness of purpose that our national security demands.

National security and survival should not be partisan issues. Indeed, they are not, both major parties put traitors in the White  House. Both Democrat and Republican  Presidents have lied about the identity and nature of the enemy.  Both have conducted the war with suicidal idiocy.  Our national purpose is to live securely, with liberty and prosperity, as a  shining example for the world to emulate.  Submission to enslavement is not our national purpose.  Pouring our blood and treasure down the sewer is not our national purpose. Defeat is not our national purpose.

That’s what it means to be strong in the face of violent extremism.  That’s how we will prevail in this fight.  And that’s how we will protect our country and pass it — safer and stronger — to the next generation.

We can only prevail in this conflict by making the enemy extinct.  Until Islam ceases to exist, either through apostasy, attrition or death, there will be neither peace nor security in this world; both life and liberty will be at risk.

January 8, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , | 4 Comments

Hillary Clinton: Secretary of Malarkey

Radio news reports of  Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s remarks about terrorism and economic development were insufficient basis for a blog post. I found the search to be difficult until I located a New York Times article by Nicholas Kristof which provide a link to Foreign Policy, which published the Secretary’s prepared remarks delivered to the Center for Global Development in Washington, D.C..

News reports gave the impression that Secretary Clinton had implied that terrorism is a function of poverty & deprivation, which can be ameliorated by economic development. In skimming the  prepared remarks, the sound bite  stood out like a sore thumb

We cannot stop terrorism or defeat the ideologies of violent extremism when hundreds of millions of young people see a future with no jobs, no hope, and no way ever to catch up to the developed world.

Let us apply  logic to that statement. Hati is impoverished, with little hope for the future. Are Hatians  detonating themselves? Are they hijacking aircraft and flying them into office towers?  If terrorism is a function of poverty, why aren’t Hatians  engaged in terrorist acts?

Were the five American Muslims who went to Pakistan to join the Jihad hopeless,  uneducated victims of poverty?  One of them was a dental student, others were employed. They had sufficient money to purchase expensive tickets to fly to Pakistan. How about Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab?  Is the British educated son of a Nigerian Banker impoverished?  How could he afford a ticket to America?

Ayman al-Zawahiri is a pediatrician. Usama bin Laden and Khalid Sheikh Mohammad are engineers.  Why are those professionals who could earn good incomes engaged in terrorism while the impoverished Hatians are not?  What do Abdulmutallab, Zawahiri & bin Ladin have in common?  Could it be Islam?

How could Islam motivate Muslims to engage in terrorism? [Emphasis added.]

  • 33:21. Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad ) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day and remembers Allâh much.

If a  Muslim wants to meet Allah and gain admission to Paradise, he should emulate Moe. What did Moe do that they should emulate?

  • Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

  • Bukhari Volume 9, Book 90, Number 333:

    Narrated Al-A’rai:

    Abu Huraira said, Allah’s Apostle said, “By Him in Whose Hand my life is, I would love to fight in Allah’s Cause and then get martyred and then resurrected (come to life) and then get martyred and then resurrected (come to life) and then get martyred, and then resurrected (come to life) and then get martyred and then resurrected (come to life).” Abu Huraira used to repeat those words three times and I testify to it with Allah’s Oath.

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
    Narrated Anas bin Malik:
    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

Moe is a role model for Muslims to emulate; a terrorist who craved  serial martyrdom.  He was also ordered to fight the people until they submit to Islam.  Since we have not submitted to Islam, Muslims who seek admission to Paradise must emulate Moe by fighting us, using terrorism as a battle tactic.

In fact, the Qur’an reveals that terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament, foundational to Islam, not a modern innovation.

  • 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).
  • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.
  • 8:57. So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.
  • 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly. [Abdullah Yusuf Ali]
  • 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
  • 59:2. He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Bani An-Nadir) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allah! But Allah’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).
  • 59:13. Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allah – Islamic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in their (Jews of Bani An-Nadir) breasts than Allah. That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of Allah).

Muslims who obey Allah and emulate Moe will engage in terrorism.

Which is better, poor terrorists who can’t afford explosives and airline tickets or rich terrorists who can build bombs and travel at will?  Facilitating economic development  in Islamic nations only serves to improve their ability to attack us.

Is it possible that a graduate of the Yale law school is unable to get a clue?  If the Secretary of State reads this without obtaining a clue, then we must assume that malfeasance is involved.

January 8, 2010 Posted by | GWOT | , , | Leave a comment

KSM Trial Petition

Human Events and Red State have created an on line petition demanding   reversal of the decision to try Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and four other terrorists in New York City. They list seven relevant points bearing on the idiocy of the decision.

  1. jurisprudence: bad precedent
  2. risk of technical acquittal
  3. role inversion, putting the U.S.A. on trial
  4. reversion to 9/10 criminal offense paradigm
  5. revelation of state secrets
  6. excessive security expense
  7. attractive target for renewed attack

Jed Babbin  Editor of Human Events, has written an excellent editorial which clarifies the issues very forcefully. .A Facebook group has been created to support the petition.

If you understand and care about the consequences of applying the law enforcement paradigm to acts of war, then you will join with me and 20,297 others who have signed the on line petition demanding that the terrorists be tried by military tribunals far from our vulnerable cities.

January 8, 2010 Posted by | GWOT | , , | Leave a comment

The Low-Carbon Fuel Standard
To learn more about the economic and strategic risks associated with an LCFS, visit You can find detailed fact sheets here: If you want  gasoline to be plentiful and reasonably priced, use this link to send a message to your Representative & Senators. Send a message to Congress:  demand that they vote against the Low Carbon Fuel Standard scam.

If you don’t care about escalating  fuel prices, if you don’t care about fuel scarcity, if you don’t care about the negative economic and security impact of decreased domestic oil production and increased dependence on Arab oil imports then ignore this post and do nothing.

The Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) is a scam designed to make the cost of motor fuel spiral, in  the vain hope of making alternative fuels more attractive. Of course, there are no real alternatives available in industrial quantities,  and there won’t be in the near future. It boils down to another redistribution of wealth scheme.

The Threat Is Real. President Obama, as Illinois’ junior member of the Senate, introduced LCFS legislation last Congress,i and has strongly supported action in California to ban certain North American fuels.ii Rep. Jay Inslee (D-WA),iii a member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR),iv of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources panel, have both offered LCFS legislation this Congress. And Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN), the third-ranking Republican in the Senate, continues to advocate for an LCFS.v The likelihood of a one-size-fits-all low-carbon fuel mandate becoming law – perhaps as a part of broader cap-and-trade legislation – is real. Link to source pdf.

The Consumer Energy Alliance has gathered the facts and composed a stock email you can use.  They will even address it for you. Please take advantage of their groundwork. Contact Congress today and express your objections to being  rooked.

January 8, 2010 Posted by | Global Warming Myth | , , , , | Leave a comment


%d bloggers like this: