Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Dr. Nidal Hasan’s Outline of Islam and Andrew Bolt’s Questions


The Herald Sun published an article by Andrew Bolt in which he stated critical  facts which had been ignored by some journalists and propounded certain rhetorical of a most critical nature.  The article included a link to his blog, where  I discovered a link to Dr. Hasan’s slide show at the Washington Post.

It has been reported that Dr. Hasan’s assignment was to deliver a lecture on a medical topic. Instead, he lectured about Islam and its potential effect on servicemen and the Army.  In retrospect, the advice given in the last slide should have been applied in his case.

The slide show  presents a basic outline of  Islam, hitting the most essential highlights. Most of the slides display Qur’an verses or hadith.  I have no doubt that the lecture elaborated upon the military application of those slides.

The information presented in the slide show is basically accurate, with the exception of two areas where error has crept in. Slide #36, pertaining to peace & forgiveness,  overlooks the fact that those verses have been abrogated by Surah At-Taubah.  #38 & 39 misrepresent 9:38 & 9:39 as relating to defense though they are contained in a Surah dedicated to excoriating Muslims who refused to join the ghazwat against Tabuk.  Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir confirms the obvious.

I hope that you will click the link to the slide show, view it and consider its contents carefully.  Its implications for military recruitment & retention policy are clear.  Neither the Muslim who shrinks from conflict with fellow Muslims nor one who  anticipates an opportunity to turn against friendly forces should be recruited or retained.  I doubt the possibility of accurately identifying all members of those two classes of Muslims.

The critical questions propounded by Mr. Bolt are listed below, followed by my answers.

  • How much of a threat is Islam to a secular, multi-ethnic society like America’s – and ours?
  • How sure can we be of the loyalty of Muslim troops in a war against a Muslim country?
  • Have we become so fearful of asking such questions that even a Hasan, with his record for hate-preaching, is not just allowed to serve in the US military, but is promoted to the rank of major by people apparently too scared to seem racist to object?
  • And can you trust journalists to even tell you the facts you need to reach the right answers?

Islam is an existential threat, immediately to random individuals as in the massacre of ’02 in Metropolitan  Washington D.C.  and to the nation in the long term if we don’t wise up and defend ourselves adequately and effectively by eliminating it.  We can no more tolerate Islam in our midst than rattlesnakes and copper heads in our homes.  All three are venomous, aggressive and predatory.

We can be sure of the past loyalty of Muslim troops after the war is ended without treacherous behavior on their part. We can never be sure of their future loyalty. We now know that Dr. Hasan is extremely disloyal.

The question about fearing accusations of hate/racism  answered itself,  it does not require amplification.

Journalists can only report what they know. In the early hours of any incident, that knowledge base will be small, growing over time as new information comes to light . But many journalists have agendas, as do the publications that employ them. We can not trust all of them all of the time; we must not become dependent on a single source of information about current events.

November 11, 2009 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , | 1 Comment

Major Hasan’s act of Worship


In an article at NewsMax cites an  FBI estimate saying that 10% of American Mosques teach jihad, Ron Kessler made the following statement.

On the other hand, those who condemn Muslims in general because of the actions of Hasan and others like him are engaging in prejudice that has no place in America. Indeed, such stereotyping sets back the war on terror, because we need moderate Muslims on our side.

The problem is not the Quran, which is no more incendiary than some passages in the Bible. (Deuteronomy, for example, prescribes stoning to death for those who “served other gods and worshipped them.”) The problem is the radical element that uses the Quran as an excuse to engage in terrorism and the failure of many moderate Muslims to condemn the extremists.

It is Islam we condemn in general, not Muslims. Most Muslims are victims of Islam.  There are Muslims in name only, who do not practice Islam,  but there are no moderate Muslims because there is no moderate Islam.   Those who assert otherwise are suffering from extreme cognitive dissonance.

Islam has a standard set by Moe’s preaching and practice. Islam is what he said and did in Allah’s name. The Qur’an’s Surah Al-Anfal contains an imperative to fight disbelievers, specifically the Pagan Meccans, until all resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped. Hilali & Khan offer this bracketed clarification: “[in the whole of the world ]”. Abdullah Yusuf Ali uses a different expression: “faith in God altogether and everywhere”.

Surah At-Taubah has an imperative to fight people with scriptural religions until they are subjugated and extorted.  Those imperatives are outcome oriented, with neither chronological nor geographic limits.

The Old Testament enjunctions to fight were limited to particular people and places, they were not unlimited.  Jesus Christ neither preached nor practiced warfare. Jews and Christians are not engaged in wars of conquest.  While  Judaism and Christianity have reformed and become passive, Islam is not reformed nor can it. Islam is aggressively attempting to conquer or reconquer on several battlefronts.

The Qur’an is given as  Allah’s word, transmitted to Moe by  Jibril. Allah’s religion is perfected for Muslims; perfection can only be defiled, not improved. Allah’s word can not be changed. When Allah abrogated a verse, he replaced it with something better; Surah At-Taubah was revealed next to last, it abrogates earlier, more tolerant and passive verses. Since Moe was Allah’s final and greatest ‘Prophet’,  Allah has no messenger, his word is immutable, fixated in the 7th century.

Moe testified that he was “ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.'”, confirming the imperatives cited above. Muhammad fought in 19 battles. Muslims assert that those battles were defensive, not offensive but only two of them were.  Moe dictated and dispatched extortion letters, which he followed up with his army if the recipients did not comply with his demands. His letter to the Chiefs of Aqaba is the most explicit, it leaves no doubt about his intentions.

Allah described his relationship with Muslims as that of master: slave, the slave’s mission being to fight in his cause, killing and being killed.  Jihad is mandatory, “ordained” for Muslims.  The penalty for refusing to fight is “painful torment”, a hint of Hellfire.  The “commerce that will save you from a painful torment” is “that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives“.    According to Allah,  any step the believers take to anger or injure disbelievers will be “written to their credit as a deed of righteousness.”.

Islam’s canon of jurisprudence is the ultimate confirmation. Reliance of the Traveller, is the handbook of fiqh. Its  Book O is the book of Justice. Its ninth chapter lays down the law of Jihad, defining it, describing its obligatory nature and explaining  the obligation: “Jihad is a communal obligation, meaning upon the Muslims each year. “. Al-Shafi’i clarified the issue with this ruling.

“The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims’ interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse.”

I will quote the first sentence from each of the two sections which confirm the obvious.

O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

“Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9:29).

O9.9

The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) .

Islamic law clearly confirms Allah’s Jihad imperatives and Moe’s testimony that he was ordered to fight. The caliph has a duty to make war on Kuffar in every year, if possible, until the entire world is conquered. Of course, the caliph’s order or permission is required to mount an attack, unless there is no caliph. (O9.6).

Contrary to Mr. Kessler’s assertion, condemnation of Islam is not prejudicial and the Qur’an is the root of the problem.  Muslims whose personal morality conflicts with orthodox Islamic doctrine should remove Allah’s yoke of slavery from their necks and become freemen.  If you do not want to kill Kuffar, rape their widows and enslave their orphans, why are you Allah’s slave? Emancipate yourself and rejoin humanity.

In remarks uttered at a memorial service for the servicemen slain at Fort Hood, President Obama said this.

It may be hard to comprehend the twisted logic that led to this tragedy.  But this much we do know — no faith justifies these murderous and craven acts; no just and loving God looks upon them with favor.  For what he has done, we know that the killer will be met with justice — in this world, and the next.

A Muslim is not permitted to fight and kill another Muslim except in the authorized enforcement of Islamic law.  Major Hasan was reluctant to go into battle against his brethren, but not to go into battle against his  comrades.  Muslims chant Allah-hu Akbar when slaughtering sacrificial animals and attacking Kuffar.  Major Hasan shouted takbir because he was engaging upon the slaughter of his enemies, transferring his fear from himself to them and praising Allah

Murder can not be justified, it is unjust, but Islam rationalizes it. We learn from Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 that the blood of Kuffar is not sacred to Muslims. Kuffar are considered rebels against Allah, and therefore not innocent. They are fair prey, targets of opportunity. . Islam divides the world into Dar ul-Islam where Allah’s writ runs, and Dar ul-Harb, where Kuffar rule. Dar al-Harb is the land of war. It must be attacked until the entire world is Dar al-Islam.

Allah is sovereign over the world, its divine ruler because, as its creator, he owns it all. Where men are governed by man made law, they are in rebellion against Allah, depriving him of his divine right to rule. Allah has commanded Muslims to overthrow the rebels and extend Allah’s rule over the entire world.  Allah has promised them success in that mission. You can verify these facts by reading 13:41, 14:1540:51 and 61:9

.

We’re a nation that guarantees the freedom to worship as one chooses.

Major Hasan chose to worship Allah by sacrificing 13  Kuffar soldiers.  That is his right because Jihad is a mandatory sacrament, being ordained by Allah. Allah said  “Slay them wherever you find them‘”.  Is that cherry picking?  Is that out of context? If it is, tell it to the Shafi’ite jurists who wrote Reliance of the Traveller; that quote is part of the scriptural basis of jihad given in O9.0.

November 11, 2009 Posted by | Uncategorized | , , | 2 Comments

Ground Broken for Terrorist Memorial Mosque


With the media, politicians and bureaucrats thoroughly in thrall of the enemy, this seems to be a lost cause, but Alec has not given up yet. I admire his persistence and perseverance.  The heroes are about to be rolled over again. What a travesty!
Blogburst logo, petition The desecration has begun. A ground-breaking ceremony was held at the Shanksville crash site on Saturday. Bulldozers will start reshaping the land this week. Never mind that the only rule for the Flight 93 memorial’s design competition was that the landscape had to be left as it was. In order to complete the full arc of the Crescent of Embrace (now called a broken circle, but still a giant Islamic-shaped crescent), an earthen causeway will have to be built across the wetlands that lie about 50 vertical feet below the crash site.

A contractor posted recently about his decision to turn down work on the memorial, despite economic hard times. Our friend Jeff just could not stomach the idea of helping to build a tribute to the enemy, a sentiment that is easy to understand and much appreciated. To anyone else who might find themselves in this situation, just be aware that there are other options. Someone is going to do the work, and if the pay is lucrative, it could be better for our cause to have that money go to someone who is on our side.

Blogburst author Alec Rawls has succeeded in driving driving quite a bit of Western Pennsylvania news coverage through the purchase of a half-dozen half-page full-color ads in the local Somerset paper. If anybody wants to fund another, Alec will gladly put the ad together. Call it anti-dhimmi jiu-jitsu. We can use the Park Service’s own money against them. If we don’t succeed, then you have to live with knowing that you helped to build an abomination. There is no simple answer.

On the subject of worthy causes, long-time blogburst participant Curt at the excellent Flopping Aces blog is helping to orchestrate fundraising for Project Valour-IT, which helps provide voice-controlled computers and other technology to Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines recovering from hand wounds and other severe injuries. Soldiers Angels, which hosts Valour-IT, is also fundraising for the victims of the jihad attack on Fort Hood. To join our blogbursts, just send your blog’s url.

November 11, 2009 Posted by | Political Correctness | , | Leave a comment

   

%d bloggers like this: