Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

The Censorship Protocol

This is what the IHEU is warning about in their  press release, as the second of three listed threats to liberty.

Call upon all governments to resist the efforts of the “Ad Hoc Committee on Complementary Standards” to alter the ICERD;.

This draft complementary international standards in the fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance has been prepared for the implementation of paragraph 199 of the Program of Action(A/CONF.189/12).

199. Recommends that the Commission on Human Rights prepare complementary
international standards to strengthen and update international instruments against racism, racial
discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance
in all their aspects;

Article 4 of the proposed protocol to ICERD  is titled: Prohibition of Incitement to Racial Hatred.
This article contains several notable provisions.

  1. States Parties condemn all propaganda, practice or organization to justify or encourage any form of hatred or discrimination against persons belonging to groups such as religious groups, refugees, asylum seekers, people displaced, stateless persons, migrants and migrant workers, descent-based communities such as people of African descent, indigenous peoples, minorities and people under foreign occupation.
  2. States Parties undertake to adopt immediate and positive measures designed to eradicate all incitement to such hatred or discrimination, including:
  1. to declare an offense punishable by law all dissemination of ideas to such discrimination or hatred, as well as all acts of violence or incitement to such acts directed against persons belonging to particular groups;
  2. to declare illegal and prohibit organizations and propaganda activities organized and any other type of propaganda which incites hatred or discrimination or who encourages, and to declare punishable by law the involvement in such organizations or activities;
  3. not permit public authorities, national or local, to incite hatred or discrimination;
  4. not to allow political parties to incite hatred or discrimination.
  5. to strengthen their laws or take the legal provisions necessary to prohibit and punish racist and xenophobic platforms and discourage by a democratic debate vigilant the integration of political parties promoting these platforms in Government to legitimise their implementation alliances.

This protocol to ICERD would become International law, binding on signatories, and a provision in  Article 17 prohibits reservations. We need a definition of terms:

  • justify or encourage any form of hatred or discrimination
  • incites hatred
  • racist and xenophobic

Here is a clue from Article 6.

The fundamental characteristic of all the events to certain religions and descriditer to insult people or groups who share the religion, commonly called “defamation of religions” and all the fear and religious discrimination is inciting racial hatred For religious and address the issue of defamation of religions in a universal, it is essential to bring this discussion to the international instruments on human rights.

According to that, anyone who says or writes anything negative about Islam incites racial hatred.  Is that clear yet?  Examine what U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said about Geert Wilders’ Fitna:.

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”[Reuters]

Geert Wilders quoted the Qur’an and displayed images of rabble rousing Imams and their followers, along with some of the results of their preaching.  Ban Ki-moon says that constitutes hate speech and incitement to violence.

Masood Khan quoted Ban Ki-Moon’s representative to the Alliance of Civilizations as declaring Fitna to be ” a deliberate incitement to discrimination,  violence and hatred on grounds of religion, aimed at provoking and promoting social unrest”. [Masood Khan’s statement of 04/01/08]

If  we accurately describe Islam’s doctrines & practices, quoting its canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence, we are automatically convicted of hate speech; inciting violence. This is part of an Orwellian campaign to dis-arm us, to render us incapable of warning against Islamic aggression.

This protocol would outlaw two American and two European political parties for their anti-Islam platforms.  Muhammad, claimed to be the best and greatest of men, worthy of emulation as a role model was a murderer, pedophileterrorist. For genuine hate speech and incitement to violence, read the Qur’an, don’t stop there, read the next six verses. Is cursing Jews & Christians hateful enough for you? How about genocide? He killed all the men of a Jewish village after they surrendered, then he examined the boys for pubic hair and slaughtered those who had it.

Islam seeks to criminalize its critics because it has no defense against the facts contained in its own canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence.  Moe had good reason for forbidding his followers to carry the Qur’an into Dar al-Harb: “That is out of fear that the enemy will get hold of it.”

Don’t just sit there waiting for the noose to be placed on your neck.  Send an email to your Senators, and to President Obama. Tell them that the proposed protocol is unacceptable. Tell them that you consider support for it to be tantamount to treason.  You can send your email through the Federal Officers link at . Include a link to this blog post in your email so that your Senators can become informed.

March 24, 2009 - Posted by | Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , ,


  1. Also meaningfull is “or who encourages”. It is so far-reaching that already having a firm theological position adverse the false teachings of islam and making it publik, were to be forbidden by law. For example citing church fathers such as St. John of Damascuss who called Mohammed a “false prophet” were forbidden:

    Btw. I was not aware so far that it adresses ICERD.

    Comment by antifo | March 24, 2009 | Reply

    • One proposal would create a new protocol attached to ICERD. It makes demands parallel to those made by the UNHRC, General Assembly and Durban. For those who read French, the .doc file is at Un Watch

      I am starting to think in terms of an on line petition pointing out how Islam contravenes various UN accords, including ICCPR & ICERD. I doubt that anyone can be found to promote it properly though.

      Comment by dajjal | March 25, 2009 | Reply

  2. […] The Censorship Protocol […]

    Pingback by UN Censorship: Outlawing Criticism of Islam « Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back | November 16, 2011 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: