Boston-Bombings-A-First-Look: Debunking CAIR’S Testimony to the Homeland Security Cmte.
Boston-Bombings-A-First-Look: Debunking CAIR’S Testimony to
the Homeland Security Cmte.
CAIR submitted thirteen pages of written testimony
to the United States House Committee on Homeland Security. In my
view, the major thrust of the testimony is condemnation of alleged
profiling & entrapment. I see it as equivalent to the Mafia
telling the committee how organized crime should be investigated and
prosecuted. Uncle Vladdi
suggested this, with which I agree:
Or, the Nuremberg trials
being boycotted until they were conducted by only officially
Nazi-vetted “prosecutors” (conciliators) “because otherwise they might
be prejudiced by bigots and lack legitimacy!”
If you desire to read the testimony, use the
thirteen pages link
above to download it in pdf format. I am extracting a few
statements exemplary of al-Taqiyya & kitman to refute. [Emphasis
added for clarity.]
Targeting al-Qaeda-Inspired Violent Extremism
to any
one ethnicity, political ideology or religion. In January, the West
Point Military Academy’s Combating Terrorism Center reported that since
2001, violent white supremacists and other far-right groups have
murdered 306 Americans and injured another 1,616.i Since the
events of
September 11, individuals associated with or inspired by al-Qaeda or
similar groups have committed 37 murders in the U.S., out of the
180,000 murders committed during that time.ii Moreover,
since 1979
environmental and animal rights extremists have committed over 2,000
crimes and caused more than $110 million in damage.iii
Terrorism is not limited to the USA. It is performed
all over the world. Most of it is done by Muslims. The two
attacks on the World Trade Center were not done by right wingers or
Christians. The attempted Times Square bombing was not plotted by
a Jew. Numerous foiled plots were planned and almost carried out
by Muslims. The Boston Marathon bombing was carried out by
Muslims, motivated by their religion.
No matter what anyone else does or has done, Islam;
off the shelf, normative, as revealed and exemplified by Moe, motivates
Muslims to maim, mutilate, kill and enslave. Since 623, 270*106 lost their lives to Islamic
imperialism.
Violent Extremism
Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam
predating the formation of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood and its
offshoot, al-Qaeda. Allah said in the Qur’an that he would
and did
“cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve” and described the
consequences of that act. Allah commanded Muslims to strike
terror into the hearts of disbelievers by building
a mighty army and harsh
treatment of defeated victims. Allah promised to reward
Muslims who take
any step to injure or enrage disbelievers.
Moe said that he was made victorious by terror cast into the hearts of
his enemies. Allah said that Moe was an excellent
example to emulate if one desired admission to his celestial bordello.
Terrorism is not extremism; it is normative Islam,
commanded by Allah and exemplified by his Messenger. Moe terrorized his
victims by harsh treatment of defeated people and assassinations. He also dictated &
dispatched explicit extortion letters.
al-Qaeda-Inspired
Terrorist groups do not inspire terrorism, they draw
attention to Allah’s imperatives,
threat & promise, which motivate
believers to do his wet work. They remind believers
of the fard al-kifaya of participation in annual attacks
against infidels.
While al-Qaeda and other groups exploit real and
perceived provocations and grievances to pressure believers
to engage in violence, Allah’s imperatives, threat & promise
and Moe’s exemplary conduct are the real sources of the terrorist
impulse.
the government to responsibly counter domestic acts of terrorism
carried out or inspired by al-Qaeda or similar groups it is important
for law enforcement to develop a uniform and shared understanding of
the ideology that motivates al-Qaeda’s violent extremism as opposed to
the religious beliefs and principles of Islam.
ideology
- Only Allah has the right to be worshiped. 3:2
- Only Allah has the right to legislate & rule, which he
delegated to Moe and his successors. 33:36 - Jihad is ordained for Muslims. 2:216
- War must be waged against pagans until only Allah is worshiped on
a global scale. 8:39 - War must be waged against Jews & Christians until they are
subjugated & extorted. 9:29 - Acts of terrorism are credited to the terrorist as righteous good
deeds. 9:120 - The blood and property of infidels ain’t not sacred to Muslims.
Infidels only acquire human rights when they become Muslims. Bukhari 1.8.387 - The basic penalty for “waging war against Allah and his
Messenger” is execution. 5:33- “waging war against Allah and his Messenger” includes disbelief
http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//5.13751.html
- “waging war against Allah and his Messenger” includes disbelief
religious beliefs and principles of Islam
The bullet points immediately above this heading
contain bold blue underlined text: hyperlinks to authentic Islamic
sources including the Qur’an, Sahih Bukhari and Tafsir Ibn
Kathir. The imperatives, threat & promise laid down in Surahs
Al-anfal &
At-Taubah, confirmed in authentic hadith and codified in Shari’ah, are religious
beliefs and principles of Islam.
Anyone wishing to understand the ideology of Islam
should read The Prophet of Doom in
addition to the texts linked above. .
prohibits extremism and an essential part of the faith is moderation.
The Quran, Islam’s foundational holy text, states: “We made you to be a
community of the middle way, so that (with the example of your lives)
you might bear witness to the truth before all mankind.” (Quran, 2:143)
Extremism prohibited
Moe massacred the men and boys of a Jewish settlement
after they had surrendered following a two week siege. Read more about
it here: http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//33.41512.html
. Moe did that; exemplary, moderate Islam, not extremism, which
would be prohibited.
8:67.
It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free
them with ransom) until
he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You
desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for
freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And
Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
47:4.
So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause), those who
disbelieve smite
at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them,
then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives).
Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without
ransom), or ransom (according to what benefits Islâm), until the war
lays down its burden. Thus [you are ordered by Allâh to continue in
carrying out Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm
(i.e. are saved from the punishment in the Hell-fire) or at least come
under your protection], but if it had been Allâh’s Will, He Himself
could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you
fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are
killed in the Way of Allâh, He will never let their deeds be lost,
genocide
What does Allah want? Genocide: “great
slaughter”; “killed and wounded many of them”. What did Moe want?
Ransom & plunder: “the good of this world”. Can you get a
clue? Genocide is moderate, normative Islam, not extremism.
There is nothing wrong with the massacres of Hindus, Assyrians &
Armenians, Allah demanded “great slaughter”. Got a clue yet?
radicalization
Tamerlan, 26, and Dzhokhar, 19, Tsarnaev, journey to
violent extremism
had in part begun online through social networking sites linked to
al-Qaeda-inspired videos and content. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has told
investigators that he and his brother learned to build the improvised
explosive devices (IEDs) used in the Boston attacks from the
English-language online magazine Inspire, circulated by al-Qaeda’s
Yemen branch, and were influenced partly
by the online sermons of Anwar al-Awlaki,
an al-Qaeda linked leader.iv It has been reported that Tamerlan had
posted to his personal YouTube account a video extolling al-Qaeda.”v
The Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) also allege that Tamerlan
was in contact by message board with at least two individuals who were
killed in a battle by Russian security forces in the Russian republic
of Dagestan in 2012.vi
Radicalizer
& 1999: Serves as vice president of
Charitable Society for Social Welfare Inc., the U.S. branch of a Yemeni
charity headed by Abdul
Majeed al-Zindani.
Federal prosecutors in a New York terrorism-financing case later
describe the charity as “a front organization” that was “used to
support al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden.”
After
Sept. 11: Attends
Muslim outreach luncheon at the Secretary of the
Army’s Office of General Counsel, according to documents
obtained by Fox
News.
Feb.
5, 2002: Awlaki
delivers lecture to senior Defense officials at the
Pentagon on Islam and Middle Eastern politics and popular
culture. See
here. http://awlaki.sethhettena.com/
How could such a nice, moderate Imam radicalize the
brothers Tsarnaev, after all, the Pentagon reached out to him.
Didn’t he lead prayers for the Islamic Congressional Staffers,
too?
Do you believe? Then you sold your soul and life to Allah in return for
admission to Paradise. Prove your faith and zeal: Allah tests them by fighting.
There are no radicals or extremists; only believers.
There is no radicalization process; there is learning of Allah’s
imperatives, threat & promise and Moe’s excellent
example.
moderate Islam
Snake Excrement!!! No such entity exists; Islam is
what it is: Moe’s authentic interpretation of his recitation as
enshrined in the Qur’an & exemplified in his Sunnah.
moderate Muslims
Whose “faith will not go beyond their
throats (i.e. they will have no faith) and will go out from
(leave) their religion as an arrow goes out of the game. So,
where-ever you find them, kill them, for who-ever kills them shall have
reward on the Day of Resurrection.”
Security
Security is not surveillance, security cameras,
investigations or infiltrating mosques. Security
is eliminating
enemy personnel from within our borders. If you want to be
sure
that some G’d'd Muslim will not run you over with his auto, shoot you,
stab you or dismember you with a bomb, then send them all home and
exclude them from entry. No Muslim students, technical workers,
medical
specialists, religious workers or tourists. No Muslims!
Expel them and exclude them.
Raccoons and skunks carry rabies and knock over
trash
cans. Muslims maim and kill. Its what they do when they obey Allah and
emulate his Profit;. Put a bounty on
them if you want to be safe at home.
Exposing Islam Through CAIR’s Lies about the Boston Marathon Bombing
Bare Naked Islam posted and commented on a CAIR OPED, from which I extracted
a crucial phrase and did a search. The text turned up on CAIR’s
Facebook page. I have reproduced it below, highlighting some
important words, phrases & clauses which I will dissect below
the OPED.
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/08/nihad-awad-of-crap-chief-spokesislamist-for-muslim-brotherhood-front-group-cair-claims-the-recent-islamic-terrorist-attacks-in-boston-are-unrelated-to-jihad/#comment-173841
https://www.facebook.com/CAIRNational
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151453581892695&set=a.92140837694.89999.42590232694&type=1
Nihad Awad, like all lying Muslims, assumes that we
are stupid, illiterate and gullible. With a smug smirk he plays
semantic games, cherry picks scripture and misrepresents the damnable
doctrines & practices of Islam.
The bothers who bombed the Boston Marathon were
Muslims. The surviving bomber said that they were motivated by
religion. What component of Islam would motivate anyone to maim
and mutilate as many people as possible? After reading this
post, you will be able to answer that question.
[Qur'an & hadith links added. Superscripts are linked to my
comments.]
Jihad and Islam
By Nihad Awad
There is a growing attempt by some commentators to label the recent
bombings in Boston as “jihad” and to blame the deadly blasts on a
non-existent
concept they call “radical Islam.”1
I call “radical Islam” non-existent because radicalism or extremism
is
not permissible in Islam. Islam prohibits extremism2 and an
essential
part of the faith is moderation. A more accurate term
might be
“Al-Qaeda ideology3.”
The Quran, Islam’s foundational holy text, states clearly: “We made you
to be a community of
the middle way, so that (with the example of your
lives) you might bear witness to the truth before all mankind.” (Quran,
2:143)
The Quran also states: “O you who believe! Stand out firmly for
justice, as witnesses to God, even against yourselves, or your parents,
or your kin, and whether it be (against) rich or poor: for God can best
protect both.” (Quran, 4:35)
There is no such thing as radical Islam4,
but there are radical
Muslims5
– just as there are extremists
of every other religion6 or belief.
But there’s a huge difference between the existence of radical
individuals and a religion
that permits radical beliefs or actions.
These radicals
certainly do not represent the teachings of Islam or the
behavior or beliefs of mainstream Muslims7.
In one Islamic tradition, called a “hadith,” the Prophet Muhammad said:
“Religion is very easy and whoever overburdens himself in his religion
will not be able to continue in that way. So you should not be
extremists, but try to be near to perfection and receive the good
tidings that you will be rewarded; and gain strength by worshipping in
the mornings, the nights.” [Bukhari 1.2.38]
In recent years, we have seen the term “jihadist” come to be used as if
it means a person who kills people out of a religious motivation8,
but
this is terribly inaccurate.
“Jihad”
does not mean “holy war.” 9Literally,
jihad means to “struggle,”
strive and exert effort. It is a central and broad Islamic concept that
includes struggle against evil inclinations within oneself, struggle to
improve the quality of life in society, struggle
in the battlefield for
self-defense 10(e.g., – having a standing army
for national
defense11), or
fighting
against tyranny or oppression.
For the sake of accuracy and to avoid spreading false information about
a major world religion, extremist
Muslims who commit crimes should be
called criminals or, in cases where the definition fits, terrorists.
We
should not legitimize
their actions by calling them jihadists, even if
they attempt to call themselves by that label and seek a false
religious connection or justification. These criminals should not be
honored with a religious label.
Islam allows legitimate self defense, but prohibits
the killing of
innocent people12, even in times of war or
conflict. Aggression
is never
permitted.13
“And fight in the cause of God those who
, and do
not
commit aggression. Indeed God does not love those who are
aggressors,”
(The Quran, 2:190).
So yes, there are some Muslims who have extreme views, or mental
illnesses, or political grievances, or a host of other reasons that
lead them to kill people, and this is not only a tragedy and a crime
but an egregious
violation of the principles of Islam.
The difference between Muslim killers and killers from other
backgrounds is often the way they are described by the media and viewed
by the public: with Muslim killers, the
crime is almost always
attributed to their religion.14
Because the word “terrorism”15 is used almost exclusively to
describe
crimes whose perpetrators are Muslims, you might think that a majority
of mass killings and acts of terrorism in the U.S. were committed by
Muslims. But when we look at the facts, that perception does not hold
up.
* According to FBI statistics, of all terrorist attacks on U.S. soil
from 1980 to 2005, six percent were committed by Muslims. (Source:
http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005/terror02_05#terror_05sum)
* According to a study from the Combating Terrorism Center at the US
Military Academy, since 2011, politically-motivated attacks by Muslim
Americans have killed 33 people, while terrorist attacks by white
supremacists and other right-wing extremists killed more than 200
people. (Source:
* According to a report by the Triangle Center on Terrorism and
Homeland Security, “66 Americans were killed in mass shootings by
non-Muslims in 2012 alone, twice as many fatalities as from
Muslim-American terrorism in all 11 years since 9/11.” (Source:
http://kurzman.unc.edu/muslim-american-terrorism)
In a well-known hadith, a man asked the Prophet Muhammad, “What is the
best
jihad?” to which Prophet Muhammad replied, “Speaking a word of
truth to an oppressive ruler.”
The constant misuse of terms like “jihad” and “radical Islam” is
offensive to the truth and is counterproductive to our nation’s efforts
to achieve security.
It is time we all speak a word of truth by applying the proper labels
to criminals and their acts of violence, no matter their religious
background.
[Nihad Awad is national executive director for the Washington-based
Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the nation's largest
Muslim civil liberties group. He may be contacted at: nawad@cair.com ]
—–
ISLAM-OPED is a syndication service of the Council on American-Islamic
Relations (CAIR) designed to offer an American Muslim perspective on
current political, social and religious issues. ISLAM-OPED commentaries
are offered free-of-charge to one media outlet in each market area.
Permission for publication will be granted on a first-come-first-served
basis.
Please consider the following commentary for publication.
CONTACT: CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper,
202-744-7726, E-Mail: ihooper@cair.com
radical Islam
To be effective, a professional liar will include
some truth in his spew of malignant malarkey. It is true that
there is no such thing as radical Islam. Islam is what it is; its
standard was set 1400 years ago by Moe’s recitation, which is recorded
in the Qur’an and exemplified by Moe’s sunnah
& Sira. Imperialism, terrorism, rape & pillage are
intrinsic sacraments of Islam, not bida introduced by “extremists
or radicals”
I disrespectfully direct doubters, deniers &
dissenters to Craig Winn’s The Prophet of Doom,
which combines the most significant parts of the Qur’an, hadith, Sira
& Tahrik in 1000 pages supplying the context & chronology
lacking in the Qur’an. If you lack the patience for 1000 pages,
read the In
His Own Words Appendix for the highlights.
extremism
Normative Islam is extreme; it encompasses global imperialism, terrorism, genocide, rape and
pillage. Those intrinsic sacraments of Islam are not
prohibited. Transgressing the limits is prohibited.
The limits are set in Sahih Muslim 19.4294,
in which Moe commands his generals to make holy war. What would profane
it? Embezzling spoils, killing children, mutilating bodies and fleeing
from battle are the limits which must not be transgressed; which would
profane Islam’s holy war.
Al-Qaeda ideology
Al-Qaeda is a subset of the Muslim Brotherhood,
which is a subset of Islam; what is their ideology? Islamic
ideology is most clearly stated in the motto of the Brotherhood,
which is copied in the Charter of HAMAS.
is its target, the Prophet is its model, the Koran its constitution:
Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of
its wishes
- Only Allah has the right to be worshiped. 3:2
- Only Allah has the right to legislate & rule, which he
delegated to Moe and his successors. 33:36 - Jihad is ordained for Muslims. 2:216
- War must be waged against pagans until only Allah is worshiped on
a global scale. 8:39 - War must be waged against Jews & Christians until they are
subjugated & extorted. 9:29 - The blood and property of infidels is not sacred to Muslims.
Infidels only acquire human rights when they become Muslims. Bukhari 1.8.387 - The basic penalty for “waging war against Allah and his
Messenger” is execution. 5:33- “waging war against Allah and his Messenger” includes disbelief
http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//5.13751.html
- “waging war against Allah and his Messenger” includes disbelief
radical Islam
This entry is redundant: see .Extremism.
radical Muslims
The correct expression is: Believers.
Believers are defined in 8:1-5. The meaning will not be clear until
you look up the context of “spend” and “go out” at http://www.quranbrowser.com/ . The
definition in 9:111 is more explicit: they sold their souls to
Allah for admission to his celestial bordello so they fight in his cause,
killing and being killed. In 49:15, they are described as only those who fight
in Allah’s cause.
extremists of other
religions
Tim McVeigh was a lapsed Catholic who acted out of
political, not religious motives. Christians who shoot
abortionists or bomb abortion mills, like McVeigh, act in contravention
of Christ’s teaching and example. Muslims engaged in terrorism
act in obedience to Allah and emulation of Moe.
- http://snooper.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/combatting-intolerance-negative-stereotyping-and-stigmatization/
- http://snooper.wordpress.com/2012/11/30/the-big-lie-terrorism-cannot-be-associated-with-islam/
mainstream Muslims
Was Moe, the founder of Islam, a mainstream
Muslim? If not, then who is? Moe revealed the Qur’an, which
enshrines the doctrines of Islam; are those doctrines not mainstream?
If Moe’s sunnah does not define mainstream Muslims, what does?
about Abu Sufyan
coming from Syria, he summoned the Muslims and said, ‘This is the
Quraysh caravan containing their property. Go out to attack it, perhaps
God will give it as a prey.’
of Aslam told him that B. Sahm
of Aslam came to the apostle and complained that they had fought and got
nothing and found nothing with the apostle which he could give them. He
said: ~O God, You know their
condition and that they have no strength,
and that I have nothing to give
them, so conquer for them the wealthiest
of the enemy’s forts with the
richest food.’ The following day God conquered
the fort of al-Sa’b b. Mu’adh
which contained the richest food in Khaybar.
Moe was a predator. Predation is part of mainstream
Islam. In Tabari, Vol. VIII, page 122, we find the sad story of
the death of Kinanah, chieftan of Khaibar Oasis.
Kinanah refused to surrender
it; so the Messenger of God
gave orders concerning him to al-Zubayr
b. al-’Awwam, saying, “Torture
him until you root out what he has.”
Al-Zubayr kept twirling his
fires tick in his breast 510 until
Kinanah almost expired; then the Messenger of God gave him to
Muhammad b. Maslamah, who beheaded him to avenge his brother
Mahmud b. Maslamah.
religious motivation
If your Lord issued divine imperatives commanding
you to wage war against pagans and ‘people of the book‘ and if he threatened you with eternal damnation if you refused to wage war and promised you admission to his celestial bordello
if you join the jihad, that would be religious motivation to engage in
offensive conquest. What if your Lord promised you extra credit
towards an upgrade in your seat in his celestial bordello for any step you take to injure or enrage disbelievers;
would that be religious motivation?
Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and his co-conspirators filed
with the military tribunal a signed response to the
“nine accusations” against them. In their document, they spill the
beans.
Many thanks to God, for his kind gesture, and choosing us to
perform the act of
Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims.
Therefore, killing you and
fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you,
responding back to your
attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion.
These
actions are our offerings to
God. In addition, it is the imposed reality on Muslims in
Palestine, Lebanon,
Afghanistan, Iraq, in the land of the two holy sites [Mecca and Medina,
Saudi Arabia], and in the rest ofthe
world, where Muslims are suffering from your brutality, terrorism,
killing ofthe innocent, and
occupying their lands and their holy sites. Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest
religious duty
to fight you over your
infidelity. However, today, we fight you over defending Muslims,
their land, their
holy sites,and their religion as a whole.
That is neither radicalism nor extremism; that is normative Islam, as
Moe preached and practiced it. That is motivated by Allah’s
imperatives, threat and promise. Those are religious motivations.
Jihad
Jihad means extreme exertion and striving. It
is not defined in the Qur’an, but it is defined in a footnote by Hilali
& Khan in their translation of 2:190.
fighting) in Allâh’s Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry) is
given the utmost importance in Islâm and is one of its pillar (on which
it stands). By Jihâd Islâm
is established, Allâh’s Word is made superior, (His Word being Lâ
ilaha illallâh which
means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion
(Islâm) is propagated. By abandoning Jihâd (may
Allâh protect us from that) Islâm is destroyed and the Muslims fall
into an inferior position; their honour is lost, their lands are
stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihâd is
an obligatory duty in Islâm on every Muslim, and he who tries to escape
from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to fulfil this
duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.
Narrated
‘Abdullâh bin Mas‘ûd رضي الله عنه: I asked Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله
عليه وسلم “O Allâh’s Messenger! What is the best deed?” He replied, “To
offer the Salât (prayers)
at their early fixed stated times.” I asked, “What is next in
goodness?” He replied, “To be good and dutiful to your parents.” I
further asked, “What is next in goodness?” He replied, “To participate
in Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause.” I did not ask Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله
عليه وسلم anymore and if I had asked him more, he would have told me
more. (Sahih
Al-Bukhâri,
Vol.4, Hadîth No.41).
holy fighting in Allah’s cause
What makes fighting holy? Intentions:
intending to please Allah. What profanes it? Embezzling spoils, killing
children, mutilating corpses and fleeing from battle.
What is Allah’s cause? To make Islam dominate the world.
legal definition
The Reliance of the Traveller, the Shafi’i school’s
handbook of Shari’ah, certified as accurate and authentic by the
Sheikhs of Al-Zzhar University, defines Jihad in Book O9.0.
(O: Jihad means to
war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the
word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is
the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare
against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless
him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad.
“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the
greater jihad.”
The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to
scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:
-1- “Fighting is prescribed for you” (Koran 2:216);
-2- “Slay them wherever you find them” (Koran
4:89);
-3- “Fight the idolators utterly” (Koran 9:36);
and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari
and Muslim
that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:
“I have been commanded to fight people until
they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the
Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say
it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the
rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah”;
and the hadith reported by Muslim,
“To go forth in the morning or evening to
fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and
everything in it.”Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts
of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give
him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he
dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally
attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought
in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy
ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent
others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were
forty-seven in number.)
self-defense
“Jihad is ordained for you” in 2:216 Allah says
Jihad, not defense. When Moe was weak, with no army, Allah
prescribed patience and forbearance. When he moved to Medina and built
a small force, Allah prescribed defensive and retaliatory fighting in 22:39.
When his army grew strong enough to raid camel caravans and small
settlements, Allah revealed the primary Jihad imperatives in Surahs
Al-anfal & At-Taubah.
The Reliance of the Traveller, in Book O9.1,
sets forth two types of jihad: offensive and defensive. The former is
required in every year, and if not performed when possible, all who
know of the obligation are in sin. The obligation is communal,
binding on all eligible male Muslims until a su8fficient number has
reported to the front.
O9.1: The Obligatory Character of Jihad
Jihad
is a communal obligation (def: c3.2). When enough people perform
it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon
others (O: the evidence for which is the Prophet’s saying
(Allah bless him and give him peace),
“He who provides the equipment for a soldier in
jihad has himself performed jihad,”
and Allah Most High having said:
“Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit
behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah’s path with their
property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their
property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to
each, Allah has promised great good” (Koran 4:95).
If none
of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then
everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there
was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the
Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal
obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent
times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.
The
first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad
(def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is
speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year.
The second state is when non-Muslims invade a
Muslim country or near to one, in which case jihad is personally
obligatory (def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants of that country, who must
repel the non-Muslims with whatever they can).
Reliance O25.9
outlines the duties of subordinate rulers; one of them holds a clue for
you: to wage war against neighboring infidels and distribute the
spoils. .
The Hanifi school adds some crucial clarity.
The destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be
not the
first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the sacred
writings which are generally received this effect.
standing army
The purpose of Islam’s army is offensive, not
defensive: to strike terror into the hearts of intended victims.
Note the expressions used in multiple translations of 8:60.
Islam prohibits
killing innocent
SnakeShit!!! 5:22
does no such thing! Words have meanings, but Muslims have their
own. They play a vicious semantic game which must be exposed.
5:32. Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if
anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread
mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if
anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all
mankind. And indeed, there came to them Our Messengers with clear
proofs, evidences, and signs, even then after that many of them
continued to exceed the limits (e.g. by doing oppression unjustly
and exceeding beyond the limits set by Allâh by committing the major
sins) in the land!.
Note the highlighted escape clause. The prohibition is in 4:92.
is not for a believer to kill a believer
except (that it be) by mistake, and whosoever kills a believer by
mistake, (it is ordained that) he must set free a believing slave and a
compensation (blood money, i.e Diya) be given to the deceased’s family,
unless they remit it. If the deceased belonged to a people at war with
you and he was a believer; the freeing of a believing slave (is
prescribed), and if he belonged to a people with whom you have a treaty
of mutual alliance, compensation (blood money – Diya) must be paid to
his family, and a believing slave must be freed. And whoso finds this
(the penance of freeing a slave) beyond his means, he must fast for two
consecutive months in order to seek repentance from Allâh. And Allâh is
Ever AllKnowing, AllWise.
4:93. And whoever kills a believer
intentionally, his recompense is Hell to abide therein, and the
Wrath and the Curse of Allâh are upon him, and a great punishment is
prepared for him.
Who is innocent? Only Muslims!!! If you ain’t
Muslim, you are a rebel against Allah and his Messenger, due to be
killed for waging war against them.
The truth is revealed in 5:33 and clarified by Tafsir Ibn Kathir.
war against Allâh and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only
that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be
cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is
their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the
Hereafter.
`Wage war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes
disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. Mischief
in the land refers to various types of evil. http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//5.13751.html
aggression is never
permitted
It is difficult to find a more egregious lie. You
have already seen ample proof of the obvious objective factual reality
if you have read this far. Whether you read Reliance of the Traveller, Risala or Hedaya, the aggressive and offensive nature of
Jihad is clear in Shari’ah.
Moe dictated and dispatched extortion letters by
private courier to his intended victims. Two of those letters are
extremely clear, leaving nothing to the imagination; I will link to
them. You can find the others on those sites.
- http://alquraan.net/letters/letters_3.html#LETTER%20TO%20THE%20CHIEFS%20OF%20AQABA
- http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.2.73.3
The quote to 2:190 is not accurate; the operative expression is
transgress the limits, not commit aggression.
http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=2&verse=190
religion & crime
Islam is a crime against humanity: a war
crime. Its mission is mercenary and its method is martial.
terrorism
What did the terrorists say when they slit the
throats of the flight crews? What did Nidal Malik Hassan shout
when he shot the soldiers at Fort Hood? What did they say when
they cut off Nick Berg’s head? What did they shout when they blew
up children at Beslan?
Mohammad Atta, in his final message to the Magnificent 19, directed them
to shout the Takbir
while slaughtering because
it terrifies disbelievers.
like champions who do not want to go back to this
world. Shout, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in the hearts
of the non-believers.”
What did Allah say he would and did cast? How
did Moe say he was made victorious?
Boston Bombing: Who and Why
Boston Bombing: Who and Why
destruction of the sword is
incurred by Infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as
appears from various passages in the sacred writings which are
generally received this effect.
The quote above comes from the Hnifi version of Islamic Law and is
found in Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, page 141. It means
that infidels may be attacked without provocation.
The Qur’an verses1
behind that passage from Islamic Law have no expiry, they are open
ended,. Thus, the communal obligation to wage Jihad against
disbelievers continues to the end of the world.
Infidels, at all times, by some party of the Mussulmans.
The quote above comes from Page 140 of Hedaya’s second volume; it is a
translator’s note The Shafi’i school’s Reliance of the Traveller,
in Book O9.1. makes plain the fact that attacks against
passive infidels are required annually; that all who know of the
communal obligation are sinners if no attack is carried out when it is
possible.
jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that
it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having
performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him
peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to
Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in
respect to non-Muslims.
The first is when they are in their
own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal
obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says,
“Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year.…
-
Objectors declare that Islam is a religion, an
equally valid pathway to God. They pray and they sway so it must be
ok. Was any legitimate religion founded for the personal emolument of its founder?
Does the deity of any legitimate religion sanctify and reward acts of
terrorism? Does the founder of any legitimate religion brag about
winning wars by terrorism? 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
33:26,27,
47:4,49:15,
59:2,13,61:10-13;
Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220. 2 Does the
deity of any legitimate religion demand genocide3 as the
price of admitting its founder to Paradise?
Is Islam a legitimate religion entitled to the umbra
of protection afforded by the First Amendment’s free exercise clause?
Why do they attack us?
That is what Adams & Jefferson wanted to learn
when they met Tripoli’s Ambassador, so
they asked him. At that
time, we had no boots on the ground in Arabia or Asia and Israel was
dominated by the Ottoman Empire.
ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the
Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all
nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that
it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could
be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and
that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure
to go to heaven.
Anything and everything Moe said while reciting the
Qur’an and everything he did in pursuit thereof is the “law of the
Prophet” After Moe died, Umar sent the army to fight nearby
kingdoms. The Persians wanted to know why they were being attacked.
Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till
you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet
has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed
(i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as
he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become
your master.” he
The orders to fight
Surah Al-Baqarah 2:216 makes it plain that Jihad4
is ordained for Muslims; a communal obligation. The next verse
makes it plain that Jihad, in that context, means holy war.
Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims)
though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is
good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allâh
knows but you do not know.
2:217. They ask you concerning
fighting in the Sacred Months (i.e. 1st, 7th, 11th and 12th months of
the Islâmic calendar). Say, “Fighting therein is a great
(transgression) but a greater (transgression) with Allâh is to prevent
mankind from following the Way of Allâh, to disbelieve in Him, to
prevent access to Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (at Makkah), and to drive out its
inhabitants, and Al-Fitnah is worse than killing. And they will never
cease fighting you until they turn you back from your religion (Islâmic
Monotheism) if they can. And whosoever of you turns back from his
religion and dies as a disbeliever, then his deeds will be lost in this
life and in the Hereafter, and they will be the dwellers of the Fire.
They will abide therein forever.”
The primary Jihad imperatives are found in Surah
Al-Anfal and Surah At-Taubah. Note that there is no mention of
their being defensive in nature and no geographic or chronological
limits on these imperatives.
And
fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism:
i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will
all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease
(worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer
of what they do.
9:29.
Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until
they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves
subdued.
Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 is one of several hadith
which confirm the Jihad imperatives. It also brings unpleasant facts to
light:
- Our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims: The season is
open and we can be attacked with impunity. - As disbelievers, we have no human rights; we only obtain them by
becoming Muslims.
Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have
been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to
be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers,
face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and
property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them
except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun
ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the
life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None
has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the
prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a
Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims
have.”
The Jihad imperatives are codified into Shari’ah, in
The Reliance of the Traveller O9.8 &
9.9.
caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N:
provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and
practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social
order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4)
-which is the significance of their paying it, not the money
itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war
continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax
(O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,…
The caliph fights all other
peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with
a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with
paying the poll tax (jizya) ) …
Where is the defensive or retaliatory element in
those provisions of Islamic law? To see clear confirmation of the
obvious, turn to O25.9 where waging war against neighboring
infidels is listed as an eighth duty of subordinate rulers.
What motivates Muslims?
Terrorists are motivated by Allah’s threat and
promise because they are believers5. If they were hypocrites,
whose Islam goes no deeper than their throats,
they would not be planting bombs. On resurrection day, Allah will
weigh their sins against their good deeds. The swing of the balance
determines where they spend eternity, Paradise or Perdition.
Allah’s threat
A Muslim who does not join the Jihad when called
will be damned.
you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked
to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to
the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the
Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as
compared with the Hereafter.
9:39. If you march not forth, He
will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another
people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all
things.
Allah’s promise
A Muslim who joins the Jihad with good intentions
will have his sins forgiven and be admitted into Paradise.
You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you
from a painful torment.
61:11. That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ),
and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your
wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!
61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into
Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of
‘Adn Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great
success.
61:13. And also (He will give you) another (blessing) which you love,
help from Allâh (against your enemies) and a near victory. And give
glad tidings (O Muhammad ) to the believers.
The minimum number of wives in Paradise is two.
The maximum number is 72. The quantity and quality of food and
wine the Muslim gets and the number of virgins he gets is a function of
which of the 100 levels of Paradise he is admitted to, which is a
function of the balance of his sins and good deeds. How can a
Muslim gain extra credit toward an upgrade in Paradise? By any
step taken to injure or enrage disbelievers: ACTS OF TERRORISM!
. This fact is clear on the face of the text in 9:120.
It
was not becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins of the
neighbourhood to remain behind Allâh’s Messenger (Muhammad when
fighting in Allâh’s Cause) and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer
their own lives to his life. That is because they suffer neither thirst
nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any
step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an
enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness.
Surely, Allâh wastes not the reward of the Muhsinûn.
Why do they hate us?
Muslims hate us because we are not them. Why?
Because Allah hates us; we are accursed,
the worst
of creatures who must be punished,
defeated
and gathered into Hell. Muslims love what Allah loves and
hates what Allah hates. The concept is called Wala Wal Bara.
They hate us and attack us because we ain’t Muslims;
nothing short of sincere conversion to Islam will change that. If
we want to stop the attacks, we must deport all Muslims and exclude
them from entering. There is no acceptable alternative.
- 8:39, 9:29, 9:123
- http://snooper.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/combatting-intolerance-negative-stereotyping-and-stigmatization/
http://snooper.wordpress.com/2012/11/30/the-big-lie-terrorism-cannot-be-associated-with-islam/
- “until
he has made a great slaughter” - Translator’s definition
Jurist’s definition - 8:1-5, 9:111 & 49:15 define believers: those who fight in Allah’s
cause.
The Big Lie: Terrorism Cannot be Associated With Islam
Two draft resolutions currently under debate in the U.N. General
Assembly’s Third Committee share boiler plate reaffirming an accursed lie.
This post ignores the rest of the resolution text to concentrate on
refuting the big lie.
While pretending to combat intolerance &
violence based on religion and promote freedom of religion or belief,
these resolutions actually militate against freedom of religion,
promote violence and ignore the fact that tolerance becomes an evil
when applied to evil.
| Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping, stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons, based on religion or belief |
Freedom of religion or belief |
|---|---|
| A/C.3/67/L.47 | A/C.3/67/L.48 |
| Reaffirming that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group, |
Reaffirming that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group, |
Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam.
Allah commands and exemplifies casting terror. Muhammad
deliberately built a reputation for barbarian rapine so as to
intimidate prospective victims so that they would surrender without
resistance.
The authors and sponsors of these resolutions seek
to criminalize criticism of Islam. They want to be able to
persecute and torture me for uttering and publishing the fatal facts
found in this blog post.
Note to doubters, dissenters & deniers: kindly
click the links provided and verify the quotes, then provide relevant,
verifiable facts to refute this post in your comments.
Who Associated Islam with Terrorism?
Allah
Surah Al-Imran
into the hearts of those who disbelieve,
because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent
no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of
the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrongdoers).
The Prohibition of Obeying the Disbelievers; the Cause
of Defeat at Uhud…”Allah next conveys the good news that He will put fear of the
Muslims, and feelings of subordination to the Muslims in the
hearts of their disbelieving enemies, because of their Kufr and Shirk.
“…
Tafsir Ibn Abbas …fear of you such that
they run from you…
Surah Al-Anfal
angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror
into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so
strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.”
Allah commands the Angels to fight and support the
Believers … I
will cast fear, disgrace and humiliation over those who defied My
command and denied My Messenger,…
Tafsir Ibn Abbas …(I will throw) cast
(fear into the hearts of those who disbelieve) the fear of Muhammad
(pbuh) and his Companions. ( …
punish them
severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that
they may learn a
lesson.
Striking Hard against Those Who disbelieve and
break the Covenants …This Ayah commands punishing them harshly
and inflicting casualties on them. This way, other enemies, Arabs and
non-Arabs, will be afraid and take a lesson from their end, …
Tafsir Ibn Abbas …deal with them so as to strike
fear in those who are behind them) such that they serve as a lesson
to those who are behind them, …
power, including steeds of war (tanks, planes, missiles, artillery,
etc.) to threaten
the enemy of
Allâh and your enemy, and others besides whom, you may not know but
whom Allâh does know. And whatever you shall spend in the Cause of
Allâh shall be repaid unto you, and you shall not be treated unjustly.
Making Preparations for War to strike Fear in the
Hearts of the Enemies of Allah …(to threaten), or to
strike fear,…
Tafsir al-Jalalayn …that thereby you may dismay, terrify…
Surah Al-Ahzab
who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their
forts and cast
terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you
killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
33:27. And He caused
you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches,
and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do
all things.
Read The Campaign against Banu Qurayzah
in Tafsir Ibn Kathir to see the convergence of 8:57 & 59:2 and to
discover the identities of the group that was killed and the group that
was taken captive. Moe slaughtered the men and adolescent boys
who had surrendered after a long siege.
Surah Al-Hashr
He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the
Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their
homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get
out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from
Allâh! But Allâh’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they
expected it not, and He cast terror into
their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with
their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O
you with eyes (to see).
59:13. Verily, you (believers in
the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear
in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh. That is
because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of
Allâh).
Muhammad
Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:
The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given
to any one else before me.
1. Allah
made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a
distance of one month’s journey.
2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for
praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my
followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.
3. The booty
has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone
else before me.
4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of
Resurrection).
5. Every Prophet used to be sent to
his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the
shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I
have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the
enemy), and while I was sleeping, the
keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my
hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and
now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did
not benefit by them).
How did Allah cast terror?
Maulana Mufti Muhammad Shafi, commenting
on 59:2, in the Mariful Qur’an, says that Moe’s companions were the
agency of terror, by cutting and burning date trees.
- So, some
of the blessed Companions, in order to anger them or cast terror
into their hearts, cut and
burned down some of their date trees.
He
also cast terror by murder and genocide. Guillaume’s translation
of Hishham’s Rescension of Sirat Rasul Alah [The
Life of Muhammad] provides more details of a disturbing
nature. You really should go to Amazon and purchase a copy to
read. 8:57 & 60get
clarified on page 326.
you come upon them in war, deal with them so forcibly as to terrify
those
who follow them, haply they may take warning,’ i.e. make a severe
example of them to those that come after, that haply they may
understand.
‘And prepare what strength you can against them, and cavalry by which
you
may strike terror into the enemy of God and your enemy‘ as far
as His
words, ‘And whatever you spend in the way of God will be repaid to you:
you will not be wronged,’ i.e. you will not lose your reward with God in
the next life and a rapid recompense in this world.
Moe,
sensitive to the fact that he was a false prophet acting out of
mercenary motives, routinely had critics murdered Ka’b Ibn ai-Ashraf
was one of them; the story of his murder is in Sahih
Muslim 19.4436.
The Sira adds a clarifying detail which tells us more about by what
mechanism Allah cast terror. This brilliant little gem is found
on page 368.
attack upon God’s enemy cast terror among
the Jews, and there was no Jew in
Medina
who
did not fear for his life.
The
assassination of Ka’b Ibn ai-Ashraf terrorized the Jews of Medina so
they all feared impending murder. Asma bint Marwan was
enraged by Ka’b's murder and recited critical poetry for which Moe had
her assassinated too. The following gem of revelation is found on
page 676.
day after Bint Marwan was killed the men of B.
Khatma became Muslims because they
saw the power of Islam.
A
tribe, terrified by her assassination, converted to Islam rather than
defend themselves. The raid on the Khaibar Oasis had a similar
effect, illustrative of 8:57 which confirms how Allah cast
terror. This gem of revelation is found on page 523.
the apostle had finished
with Khaybar, God struck terror to the
hearts
of the men of Fadak when they
heard what the apostle had done to
the
men of Khaybar. They
sent to him an offer of peace on condition that
they should keep half of their produce. Their messengers came to him in
Khaybar or on the road or after he came to Medina, and he accepted their
terms. Thus Fadak became his private property, because it had not been
attacked by horse or camel.
Further elaboration & confirmation is found in
the story of the conquest of B. Qurayza on page 461.
apostle passed by a number of his companions in al-Saurayn before
he got to B. Qurayza and asked if anyone had passed them. They replied
that Dihya b. Khalifa al-Kalbi had passed upon a white mule with a
saddle
covered with a piece of brocade. He said, ‘That was Gabriel
who has been
sent
to B. Qurayza to shake their castles and strike terror to their hearts.’
Yeah, right, they saw an angel riding a mule.
But there is more and more realistic on the same page.
apostle besieged
the B. Qurayza for twenty-five nights until they were sore
pressed
and God cast terror into their hearts.
Then Moe enslaved the women and children, slaughtering the men and
adolescent boys as a terrifying example for other intended victims. Its
in 33:26-27
and on page 468.
terror into their
hearts; some you slew and some you captured,’ i.e. he killed
the men and
captured
the women and children. ‘And caused you to inherit their land
and their dwellings, and their property, and a land you had not trod,’
i.e.
Khaybar. ‘For Allah can do all things.’
CAIR, Awad and Awlaki: Al-Taqiia
Nihad Awad, Executive Director of CAIR, uttered and USA Today published remarks about the life and death of Anwar al-Awkaki. If you want to read the entire screed, use the link above; I will use major points as headings for my commentary. Al-Taqiyya is the Islamic practice of self-protection & promotion by active deception. It is based on 3:28 and exemplified by this hadith cited by Tafsir Ibn Kathir: “We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.”.
propagandist for violence and extremism
Yes, Nihad, we can agree that Awlaki was a propagandist. But he was a propagandist for Islam, which is extremely violent, by design, from 622, when Muhammad’s army became strong enough to raid camel caravans returning from foreign trade.
Before calling me a liar, read the Noble Qur’an: 8:7, its context and its explanation in Tafsir al-Jalalayn. The Battle of Badr was the outcome of Allah’s promise of the caravan or the Meccan army. On that day Moe said: “O Allah! I appeal to You (to fulfill) Your Covenant and Promise. O Allah! If Your Will is that none should worship You (then give victory to the pagans).” [Sahih Bukhari5.59.289] “This is the caravan of Quraysh carrying their property, so march forth to intercept it, Allah might make it as war spoils for you.”[Tafsir Ibn Kathir]
Real Muslim scholars refuted his twisted interpretations
Which Muslim scholars? Please list them and their credentials. What “twisted interpretations” did they refute and on what scriptural basis? Nihad Awad I call you out: provide a list of Awlaki’s “twisted interpretations” and their refutations by “real Muslim Scholars” if you are truthful.
American Muslims condemned
Specifically which “American Muslims” condemned Awlaki’s endorsement of attacking Americans and what are their credentials as Alim & Qadi? What is the scriptural basis of their condemnation of Awlaki’s message?
No person shall … be deprived
What did our army do to traitors in the two World Wars? When an American citizen removes himself to the land of the enemy and advocates his cause, exhorting fellow citizens to wage war against their neighbors so that, in three well known cases they attempt attacks, one of them successful, what should we do? Should we sit idly by and let them continue inciting terrorism? Should we mount an invasion at great cost in treasure and blood, with little chance of success or should we use the best means available to dispatch him with minimal waste and collateral damage?
order the killing of any American
Anwar al-Awlaki was not just any American, he was a traitor, an enemy combatant. He removed himself from our jurisdiction and he uttered and published calls to wage terror against American citizens, peacefully minding their own affairs at home. Killing him set no precedent for drone attacks on ordinary citizens, any precedent is applicable only to traitors openly advocating the enemy cause, carrying out jihad by the tongue.
Constitution is rendered meaningless.
Since when does a Muslim care if our organic law is negated? Islam holds Allah to be the sole legislator; the Qur’an to be the source of legislation. 33:36. It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. [...]
no-fly or watch lists
The Magnificent 19 shared a common characteristic; what was it? Their leader told them, right before the attack, to say something when they attacked; what was it? What did they say when they slit the throats of the flight crews? Exactly why did Mohammed Atta direct them to say it?
Every Muslim should be on the no fly list because there is no way of knowing when they will become true believers and exhibit sudden jihad syndrome. Muslims can not be trusted because they are Allah’s slaves, commanded to wage war on the kuffar nearest them.
drone strikes fuel anti-American anger
Terror attacks are doctrine driven, not anger driven. America was not supporting Israel, neither was it occupying Arab soil when the Barbary Pirates sacked our shipping, resulting in the Barbary Wars. When asked by what right they attacked us, they replied that [...]“that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners”[...][Wikipedia]
war on terror will not be won through force of arms
There is no war on terror; terror is a tactic, not an enemy. The enemy is the one using terror as a tactic: Islam. Allah & Moe said things about terror, perhaps you should review those statements. I will make it easy for you by providing links to translations of authentic Islamic texts.
- 3:151. We will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve [Shakir]
- 8:12. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve [Shakir]
- 8:57. Therefore, if you overcome them on the battlefield, deal with them very sternly, so as to strike terror among them [Dr. Munir Munshey]
- then by (routing) them strike terror in those that are behind them per chance they get admonition. [Dr. Kamal Omar]
- deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them [Pickthall]
- 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies[Yusuf Ali]
- 33:26. Allah did take them down from their strongholds and cast terror into their hearts [Yusuf Ali]
- 59:2. but Allah came to them whence they did not expect, and cast terror into their hearts [Shakir]
- 59:13. You are a greater cause of terror in their breasts than Allah! That is because they are people who do not understand.[Aisha Bewley]
- Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 . Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.
- Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220 I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy),
winning the war on Islam
There are two possibilities, one is preferable, the other is possible. The best way is to destroy their faith; to induce mass apostasy. To whatever extent a Muslim is unimpaired by the deleterious effects of consanguinity and has not had every vestige of morality destroyed by Islamic brainwashing, he is vulnerable to being shown the truth about Moe, who was a profiteer, not a prophet.
If our elected traitors really wanted to win, they would document how Moe received his revelations and what he did in implementing them. They would create a full length feature video and distribute it on dvds and by satellite television world wide. They would multiply the work of Father Zakaria by one million.
Fortunately, our nation was the first to implement the power of the atom. We have the means to wipe Islamic nations from the face of the earth, and we will eventually be forced to use it because we won’t fight this war the best way.
The OIC Remembers the Victims of 9/11 on its 10th Anniversary
The OIC Remembers the Victims of 9/11 on its 10th Anniversary
The OIC did not condemn the Accursed Abomination, it celebrated it,
smirking & snickering at your gullibility. Read between the
lines and between the words, scratch the surface and delve into Islam’s
canon to discover the unpleasant objective factual reality.
The OIC’s malignant pretense is reproduced below with
superscripts linked to my revelatory evidence and comments. Click any
superscript to read the comment, then use your Backspace key to return
to your place in the septic spew.
The OIC Remembers the Victims of 9/11on its 10th
Anniversary
Date: 11/09/2011 -
the 10th anniversary of 9/11 terrorist attacks, the Organization of the
Islamic Cooperation (OIC) joins the international community in
remembering the horrendous and cowardly act of terrorism
and the tragic
loss of thousands of innocent human lives. The OIC was among the first
in expressing shock and horror at the dastardly terrorist attack and in
condemning it in
the strongest terms1.
The OIC seizes this
opportunity to reiterate its firm position of condemning terrorism
in
all its forms and manifestations and to underscore that terrorism is a
repugnant malady that seeks to destroy the fundamental ethos of
humanity. This principled position of the OIC against terrorism and
extremism is clearly stated in the OIC Ten Year Programme
of Action
adopted by the Heads of State and Government in 2005.2The perpetrators of terror
have no respect
for human life or dignity3
and pursue an agenda of hate4
and destruction5.
They have no character, follow no faith6
and live by a
dogma of violence7. The OIC that is
guided by principles
of peace
and
tolerance and moderation and modernization, is a major partner
of the
international, community in combating terrorism. In doing so, the OIC
Member States have themselves become the targets of terrorists and have
paid a heavy price in terms of human life and damage to property. The
OIC endeavors to combat
terrorism at its roots8 whatever its
possible
underpinnings, whether political, economic, social or technological.
This stand has been evidenced over the past decades through the
Organization’s endeavors to mobilize energies and efforts to fight
against terrorism. The OIC’s efforts were further strengthened with the
establishment of the Convention on Combating
Terrorism in July 1999.
Perhaps, it is the only available Convention which defines terrorism9,
so far.
In its firm belief that
combating terrorism requires a multi dimensional approach and not only
the use of military means to guarantee sustainable peace, the OIC
attaches enormous importance to identifying and addressing the root
causes of conflicts and disputes10.
Dealing with
conflict through
the
comprehensive approach obviously carries huge potential benefits.
In this regard, the OIC has
been vocal in calling for historical
reconciliation among
different
religions, cultures, and civilizations11, which would be seen as
catalyst
to debunk the myth of “clash of civilizations”12
elevated by the tragic
events of 9/11, which have, also, helped, unfortunately, the
Islamophobes to pursue with their discriminatory agenda towards Islam
and Muslims. It is worth mentioning that the OIC has always emphasized
that the international
community should act in the spirit of moderation
and dialogue to eliminate
all forms of hatred, intolerance and
discrimination.13 The OIC
believes that the limits of
discrimination and
racism have already been defined by existing international human rights
instruments, including the consensually adopted HRC Resolution 16/18.
It is equally important to recall the need to observe the UNGA
Resolution 62/272 of September 5, 2008, which
negates the association
of Islam to terrorism.14 The OIC,
in this regard, calls
for the
full
adherence15
to these and other similar resolutions and
instruments.
While commending the
initiatives of the international community on combating terrorism, the
OIC reiterates its readiness to cooperate with any
credible initiative in addressing the root causes and
consequences of
terrorism with a view to having a safer world free from the evil
faces
of terrorism for our future generations.
- This is all I could find: “After
the terrorist attacks on the 11th of September 2001, the OIC issued a
statement condemning the « brutal and criminal » acts, stating that
they are in contradiction wth the teachings of Islam. The
statementunderlined the need to distinguish the terrorism practised by
groups and individuals from the national resistance of peoples for
liberation from occupation and colonialism.” Strongest possible
terms? “Allah” & “damn” are missing. That condemnation falls
far short.
1. Emphasize the
condemnation of
terrorism in all its forms, and reject any
justification or rationalization for it, consider it as a global
phenomenon that is not
connected with any religion, race, color, or
country, and distinguish
it from the legitimate resistance to foreign
occupation, which does not sanction the killing of innocent civilians.2. Introduce
comprehensive qualitative changes to national laws and legislations in
order to criminalize all terrorist practices as well as all practices
to support, finance, or instigate terrorism.3. Affirm commitment to
the OIC Convention on Combating Terrorism, participate
actively in international counter-terrorism efforts, and endeavor to
implement the recommendations of the International Conference on
Combating Terrorism, held in Riyadh in February 2005, including the
establishment of an International Center for Combating Terrorism, as
well as the recommendations of the Special Meeting of OIC Foreign
Ministers on Terrorism, held in Kuala Lumpur in April 2002.4. Support
efforts to develop an International Code of Conduct to Combat Terrorism
and to convene an international conference or a special session of the
UN General Assembly to reiterate the international consensus on
establishing a comprehensive strategy to combat this dangerous
phenomenon.- [...]“I have been ordered
to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped
but Allah.’ And if they say so,
pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will
be sacred to us[...][Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387] Islam does not hold our
lives & property sacred until we become Muslims at sword point. It
is Islam that disrespects life &
liberty. - 1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way
1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned
Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray
(such as the Christians).2:161. Verily, those who disbelieve, and die
while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of
the angels and of mankind, combined.2:162. They will abide therein
(under the curse in Hell), their punishment will neither be
lightened, nor will they be reprieved.98:6.
Verily, those who disbelieve
(in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and Prophet Muhammad ()) from among the people of the
Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They
are the worst of creatures. - 3:110. You
[true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet
Muhammad and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind; you
enjoin Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has
ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that
Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of
the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better
for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are
Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s
Command).3:111. They will do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if
they fight against you, they will show you their backs, and they will
not be helped.3:112. Indignity is put over
them wherever they may be, except when under a covenant (of
protection) from Allâh, and from men; they have drawn on themselves the
Wrath of Allâh, and destruction
is put over them. This is because they disbelieved in
the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.)
of Allâh and killed the Prophets without right. This is because they
disobeyed (Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh’s
disobedience, crimes and sins).59:2. He it is Who drove out the disbelievers
among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî
An-Nadîr) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think
that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would
defend them from Allâh! But Allâh’s (Torment) reached them from a place
whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own
dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then
take admonition, O you with eyes (to see). - What did they say when they slit the
throats of the flight crews? “Allahhu Akbar”; “follow no faith”? What
sort of Muslim follows no faith? - Bukhari
Ch 61 # 2756: …It is mentioned from Ibn ‘Umar from the Prophet, may
Allah bless him and grant him peace, “My provision has been placed
under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and humility have been
placed on the one who disobeys my command. 2:216. Jihâd
(holy fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims)
though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is
good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allâh
knows but you do not know.8:39. And fight
them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism:
i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for
Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease
(worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer
of what they do.9:29. Fight
against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among the people of the
Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with
willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. - Terrorism is rooted in the Qur’an &
sunnah. To combat terrorism, it is necessary to abjure &
curse the following ayat & ahadith without any hesitation, evasion
or mental reservation whatsoever. No Muslim will abjure & curse
these verses because by so doing, he would sign his own death warrant.
I refer doubters & dissenters to Reliance of the Traveller, O8.1 & O8.7-7.3:151. We
shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve,
because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent
no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of
the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrongdoers).8:12.
(Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you,
so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the
hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and
smite over all their fingers and toes.”8:57.
So if you gain the mastery
over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who
are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.8:60.
And make ready against them all you can of power, including steeds of
war (tanks, planes, missiles, artillery, etc.) to threaten the enemy of Allâh
and your enemy, and others besides whom, you may not know but whom
Allâh does know. And whatever you shall spend in the Cause of Allâh
shall be repaid unto you, and you shall not be treated unjustly.9:120.
It was not becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins of the
neighbourhood to remain behind Allâh’s Messenger (Muhammad when
fighting in Allâh’s Cause) and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer
their own lives to his life. That is because they suffer neither thirst
nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any step to raise the
anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is
written to their credit as a deed of righteousness. Surely,
Allâh wastes not the reward of the Muhsinûn33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture
who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their
forts and cast terror
into their hearts, (so that) a
group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.33:27. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and
their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh
is Able to do all things.59:2.
He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the
Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their
homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get
out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from
Allâh! But Allâh’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they
expected it not, and He cast
terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own
dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers.
Then take admonition, O you
with eyes (to see).59:13. Verily, you
(believers in the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic
Monotheism) are more awful as
a fear in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh.
That is because they are a people who comprehend
not (the Majesty and Power of Allâh).Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:
Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:
The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given
to any one else before me.1. Allah made me victorious by
awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one
month’s journey.2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for
praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my
followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful
for anyone else before me.4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of
Resurrection).5. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation only but I have been
sent to all mankind.Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the
shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with
terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was
sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and
put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world
and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet
did not benefit by them).33:21.
Indeed in the Messenger of
Allâh (Muhammad ) you have a good example to follow for
him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day and
remembers Allâh much.Moe is the Muslim role model; what did he do? How was he made
victorious? There is the tap root of terrorism. - OIC Convention on
Combating Terrorism“Terrorism” means any act of violence
or threat thereof notwithstanding its motives or intentions
perpetrated
to carry out
an individual or collective criminal plan with the aim of terrorizing
people or threatening to harm them or imperiling their lives,
honor,
freedoms, security or rights or exposing the environment or any
facility or public or private property to hazards or occupying or
seizing them, or endangering a national resource, or international
facilities, or threatening the stability, territorial integrity,
political unity or sovereignty of independent StatesThis
paragraph from the convention’s preamble shows us exactly why the U.N.
is not able to define terrorism: The OIC refuses to admit the
fact that the PLO, HAMAS & Hezbollah are terrorists.Confirming the legitimacy of the right
of peoples to struggle against foreign occupation and colonialist and
racist regimes by
all means, including armed struggle to liberate their territories and
attain their rights to self-determination and independence in
compliance with the purposes and principles of the Charter and
resolutions of the United Nations -
The real cause
is Allah’s damnable jihad imperatives enshrined in Surah Al-Anfal &
Surah At-Taubah. - How is reconciliation possible
between Islam and Judaism? “Worst of living creatures”, “those
who earned Allah’s wrath”, “fight those who”, “He would certainly keep
on sending against them (i.e. the Jews), till the Day of Resurrection,
those who would afflict them with a humiliating torment.”[7:167],
“The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and
the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. “O Muslim! There
is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.”"[Sahih Bukhari 4.52.177]. - The clash is between
civilization and barbarism represented by Islam. - Start by eliminating
Islam, if you have any common sense. - UNGA
Resolution 62/272 does not mention Islam
or its association
with terrorism. Other resolutions do, on the insistence of
the OIC.- 6 Expresses deep
concern in this respect that Islam is
frequently and wrongly
associated with human
rights violations and terrorism and, in this
regard, regrets the laws oradministrative measures specifically designed to control and monitor
Muslim minorities, therebystigmatizing them and legitimizing the discrimination they experience;
- 7 Reaffirms the commitment of all States to the
implementation, in an integratedmanner, of the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy,
adopted without a vote by theGeneral Assembly in its resolution
60/288 of 8 September 2006 and
reaffirmed by the Assemblyin its resolution 62/272 of 5 September 2008, in which it clearly
reaffirms, inter alia, thatterrorism cannot and
should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization
or
group, as well
as
the need to reinforce the commitment of the international community topromote, among other things, a culture of peace and respect for all
religions, beliefs and culturesand to prevent the defamation of religions;
- A/C.3/62/L.35
- Further
expresses its deep concern
that Islam is frequently and wrongly
associated with human
rights violations and terrorism;
- 6 Expresses deep
- Islam demands that it be shielded
from exposure; that we be prevented from lifting the lid of the septic
tank so that the world can see and smell Islam as it really is. I
intend, whenever I see that demonic demand reiterated, to use it as an
occasion for lifting that lid. Terrorism is an intrinsic
sacrament of Islam. This fatal fact is established by the numerous ayat
and two hadith which sanctify & exemplify terrorism.
Yes, the OIC remembers the accursed abomination,
with swelling pride & satisfaction at the havoc wrought by the
magnificent 19, who earned Brownie Points towards better seats in
Allah’s Celestial Bordello by steps taken to injure & enrage
disbelievers ten years ago. No, they do not condemn terrorism
because to do so would make them apostates, subject to execution.
Islam is a package deal: all or
nothing. It is not possible to renounce terrorism without
renouncing Islam, which is why they won’t do it. From this day
forward, you can ask any Muslim: “how did Allah make Muhammad
victorious?”. When he lies to you, you can cite Sahih Bukhari, 1.7.331:
“Allah made me victorious by
awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one
month’s journey. ” and 4.52.220: “I have been made victorious with
terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy),”
From this day forward, when any Muslim asserts
falsely that terrorism is harram, you can cite the numerous ayat which
sanctify it, the best of which, although indirect, is 9:120, which
promises rewards for any step taken to injure or enrage
disbelievers. 8:27 & 59: 2 fit together hand in glove,
forming a congruent pattern which can not be denied.
- punish them severely in
order to disperse those who
are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson - Then take admonition, O
you
with eyes (to see).
Obamination: Accursed Abomination 9-11 Dissembled
The name of the occasion connects it with Obamination’s “hope and change” election campaign theme: Remarks by the President at “A Concert for Hope”. It seems that he never opens his mouth to speak without re-election being the foremost consideration. Because of the extreme importance of this subject I will reproduce and respond only to the most infuriating clauses.
ultimate rebuke to the hateful killers
If our elected leaders had the courage they blather about, we would have issued the ultimate rebuke: the total eradication of the damnable institution whose execrable doctrines mandated and motivated the Abomination. We needed to say “You will meet God, who will send you to Hell; we will arrange the meeting.”
resolve to defend
If our elected leaders had the resolve to defend America, Afghanistan & Pakistan would be smoking craters and the surviving Islamic dominated nations would be on probation. When stung by a wasp, you destroy the nest so that you will not be stung again. Islam is the nest.
cannot hide from justice
It took a decade to get bin ladin, if we really got him. We could have finished him off at Tora Bora. We should have. But killing the General does not win the war. We must destroy the enemy’s will and capacity to wage war. Because our enemy is threatened with eternal damnation if they do not wage war and promised admission to Paradise if they do, they can not be defeated without destroying either their faith or their bodies.
There were two Barbary wars because we did not use enough force in the first. Take a clue from history. There will be no more attacks when there are no more Muslims. Until that happy day, there will be more attacks.
never come home
Most of them will come home in boxes or on stretchers because of the suicidal rules of engagement imposed by Obamination. All will return dead or disabled because Shrub sent men where he should have sent nukes.
commitment to leave those lands to free people
Muslims are not free people, they are Allah’s slaves. Allah’s slaves fight in his cause, global domination, killing others and being killed. They can only be free if you remove Allah’s yoke from their necks. While the populations of Afghanistan & Iraq remain Muslim, our blood and treasure are wasted. So long as their constitutions are founded on the Qur’an, we have not won, we have lost because they will return to status quo ante as sopn as we pull out.
future of peace
There can be no future of peace while Islam exists with sufficient numbers and wealth to wage war. When you are told that you go to war and Paradise or sit at home and go to Hell, you go to war, if you are a believer.
Examine the jihad imperatives in 8:39 & 9:29. Those are outcome oriented fight… until loops. Until resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped on a global scale; until Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians are subjugated, humiliated & extorted. Exactly what part of “jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist)” do you not comprehend?
Imam A;-Shafi’i has a clue for you: “The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims’ interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse.”
hold fast to our freedoms
`When Rev. Terry Jones proposed to burn a Qur’an, how did you respond? How did your top General and Secretaries of Defense and State respond? If you hold fast to our freedoms, why is your Department of State cooperating with the UN and the OIC to implement HRC Resolution 16/18, the purpose of which is to criminalize the publication of this blog post?
vigilant against those who threaten us
While Muslims will use any disguise, any ruse to evade detection in their attacks, little old ladies who really are Christian citizens in wheel chairs are not threats, we do not need to be vigilant against them. Likewise little six year old girls, Christians and citizens like their parents, are not threats. Muslims are threats. Why do we let them fly? Why do we allow them to enter and remain in this country?
souls are enriched in mosques
You falsely imply that Islam is a spiritual religion, the functional equivalent of Christianity. It is not. Islam is universal malevolence. Islam was contrived for the personal emolument of its founder through plunder, extortion & taxation. Islamic benevolence & charity are strictly for Muslims. The Qur’an has a clue for you.
not succumbed to suspicion, mistrust
Shrub consulted in the White House with Muslims who have since been convicted and sentenced for terrorism related offenses. One of them established the Muslim Chaplaincy program in our armed forces.
The Times Square Bomber, when asked by a Judge about his oath of citizenship, replied “I lied.”. The concept of al-Taqiyya makes trusting Muslims impossible. “Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda’ said, “We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.” Al-Bukhari said that Al-Hasan said, “The Tuqyah is allowed until the Day of Resurrection.” “[Tafsir Ibn Kathir]
war against Islam or any other religion
Islam is not a religion, it is a Deen: way of life. In object oriented programming terminology, it is an object with properties and methods. Its religious property serves as a troop motivator by means of a carrot and stick. The carrot is admission to Paradise, flowing with rivers of wine and populated with houris who grow new hymens after they are used by the Muslims. The stick is eternal damnation.
Islam’s economic method is jihad, which brings in revenue through plunder and extortion. Jihad is defined as “war against non-Muslims.” Jihad is undertaken on Islamic initiative, it is offensive, not defensive. I have another clue for you, lest any doubt remain. Jihad is the original religion of Islam.
Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:
I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.
Jihad, agriculture & trade are alternative economic models. If Muslims abandon jihad, Allah will curse them. When the Barbary Pirates sacked our shipping, Thomas Jefferson and John Q. Adams inquired by what right they attacked us. The answer holds a clue for you.
Islam declared and is prosecuting war against us. Our leaders are too stupid to reciprocate.
nothing can break the will
What will? Ho Chi Minh wore us down in a decade, serving as an example for Islam. We are leaving Iraq with a Muslim population and Islamic law. Every life, limb and dollar spent there has been wasted.
overcome terrorism
Yeah, right. Rumor has it that three terrorists are planning to attack us with truck bombs this weekend. We have not overcome.
our democracy is durable
Democracies are prone to mob rule, to converting government to an agent of plunder. Our wise founders gave us a republic, with a strict constitution to prevent those evils to which democracies succumb.
perfect our union
If ever there was an occasion for refraining from campaigning for re-election, this was it. But Obama could not restrain himself, he is obsessive in his promotion of the Socialist agenda.
the ideals that define our nation
The ideals defining our nation are the rights of man, dignity, equality & self-government constrained by the constitution. Socialism, Fascism, Crony Capitalism, multiculturalism and tolerance of evil are not our national ideals.
Extremism: Declining Support?
Pew Global Attitudes Project
Declining Support for bin Laden and Suicide Bombing
by Juliana Menasce Horowitz, Research Associate, Pew Global Attitudes Project
September 10, 2009
Eight years after the September 11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the Pew Global Attitudes Project finds that support for Osama bin Laden has declined considerably among Muslim publics in recent years.
The first graphic in the article depicts rejection of suicide bombing and violence against civilians. The % declaring it never justified ranges from 87 in Pakistan to 17 in Falestine. The mid range is 56/55 in Jordan/Israel.
Confidence in Usama bin Laden is reported to have declined from 34% in 2008 to 18% in 2009. The question was: ” How much confidence do you have in Osama bin Laden to do the right thing regarding world affairs- a lot of confidence, some confidence, not too much confidence or no confidence at all” The question was asked about a group of leaders. Unfortunately, only the bin Laden results are reported.
Support for suicide bombing is graphed on another page. The bar chart is two dimensional, you must click years other than ’09 to see their statistics.
Concerns about domestic extremism are charted on another page. In ’09, concern peaked at 79% in Lebanon & Pakistan. Note that “not too concerned” is combined with “not concerned”. Concerns about global extremism peak in Pakistan, Indonesia & Lebanon.
If support for bin Laden & al-Qaeda has declined, has support for Hamas, Hezbollah and other branches of Islamic terrorism declined? Is the decline a result of publicity surrounding merciless random killings in Pakistan? Is it permanent or temporary? How will it be affected if al-Qaeda brings off a mass casualty attack in Dar al-Harb before September 20?
Is there any reduction in approval of and dedication to Allah’s imperative to conquer the world by genocidal Jihad & terrorism? Why don’t they ask about attitudes toward the relevant Surahs of the Qur’an?
Read This and Curse
Damnation be upon the corrupt cretins who set this SandMaggot free! No terrorist should ever be incarcerated and released; all should be ushered into Hell.
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Headlines/Default.aspx?id=397146
The article details the evil activities of a terrorist who planted three bombs in N.Y.C.; how long and difficult was the effort to capture him, and the other bombs he planted. Now he is about to be released after serving half his sentence. There is no doubt that he will resume making and planting bombs.
I am disgusted. I am about to express my disgust to President Obama, my Representative & Senators. I urge you to go to the web site of Congress.org and follow suit. Once is enough!!!












