Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Bullshit: Ghouse vs Geller–Jihad


Pamela Geller and Michael Ghouse argued about Islam & Jihad on Sean Hannity’s radio show. You can listen to the audio here. The title of this post reflects a phrase used by twice by  Ghouse in this debate.  This debate is in the context of revelation of the fact that John Brennan, nominated to head the CIA, is one of the enemy, a slave of Allah.

Thick accents and rapid speech make this argument hard to follow, but its context and content are extremely important.  Mike is a liar: he asserted that “there is no offensive warfare in Islam”, that Islam only fights defensively.    Pamela exhibits cognitive dissonance: at once demanding that violent imperatives be expunged from the Koran and acknowledging the impossibility of expunging them.

Muslim supremacists are super arrogant, condescendingly assuming us to be so stupid & gullible that their lies will never be fact checked.  With the exception of Risala, which is only available on the web, the books you should be reading are available at Amazon and other book stores.  The internet  makes some of these texts available to those of us who are not sufficiently affluent to accrue large libraries.

The Muslim appointed to head the CIA claims that Jihad is a “legitimate concept”  of self-purification & control in Islam.  Each of the six canonical hadith collections, considered the most authentic by Islamic scholars, has a book of Jihad or expedition.  I invite you to search each of those books and extract from them the ahadith relating to Jihad an-Nafs.  What proportion of those books relate to offensive warfare against infidels and what proportion relate to wrestling with one’s ego?  [Riyad us-salihin, Tirmidhi, al Nisa'i & Ibn Majah are large pdf files that may take some time to load. If you read Riyad & Tirmidhi, you will have most of the bases covered; there is much redundancy..]

Ghouse asserts that Jihad asghar is strictly defensive: he is a liar; I submit proof!   Reliance of the Traveller, cited by Geller in the debate, defines Jihad as war against non-Muslims.  Here is the full quote, with links added for reference.

Chapter O9.0: Jihad

(O: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad.

“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad.”

The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:

-1- “Fighting is prescribed for you” (Koran 2:216);

-2- “Slay them wherever you find them” (Koran 4:89);

-3- “Fight the idolators utterly” (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

“I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah”;

and the hadith reported by Muslim,

“To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it.”Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.)

Islamic law describes the obligation to wage war against passive infidels as communal: fard al kifaya, which lapses with respect to individuals once a sufficient number have responded.  Other obligations, such as Saum & Zakat, are fard Ayn: individually binding.  Jihad only becomes fard Ayn when Dar ul-Islam is invaded or threatened.  I refer doubters, dissenters & deniers to Reliance O9.1.  The obligation to attack passive infidels is described as binding upon Muslims in every year.

Subsequent sections of Chapter 9 inform us that “The caliph makes war on Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians” and “fights all other peoples until they become Muslims. ” I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers: damned fools one and all, to O9.8 & 9.9 for a critical lesson in objective factual reality.

The handbook of Hanifi Fiqh makes it plain with slightly archaic language: war must be carried out continuously, and it is undertaken on Islamic initiative, not in reaction to provocation.  I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers, damned fools one and all, to Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1, pg. 140 & 141 to obtain a clue.

http://www.archive.org/stream/hedaysorguide00hamigoog#page/n154/mode/1up

  • Text
    •     The destruction of the sword  is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are generally received this effect.
  • Marginal Note
    • Infidels may be attacked without provocation.

The Sealed Nectar is described As the official biography of the Profit.  I now present to you a portion of its Table of Contents.  Note the frequent occurrence of terms such as battle and invasion.  Islam is so peaceful!  The violence started while the Profit was alive, in his last decade though Ghouse would have you believe that it is bida, inserted long after his death.  Note the extortion letters dictated and dispatched to neighboring Kingdoms prior to several invasions.

[Emphasis added.] [Source: http://www.sunnipath.com/library/Books/B0033P0000.aspx ]

The violence flows from Allah’s Jihad imperatives enshrined in the Koran.  Obtain a clue from Tafsir Ibn Kathir, which explains them.

Have you seen those signs which declare triumphantly that Islam will dominate the world?  Where do Muslims get that idea?  Once again, Ibn Kathir has the answer for us.

We have foolishly allowed an enemy fifth column to invade our territory and infiltrate our government.  It is essentially necessary to expel and exclude Muslims from America and Western Civilization.  We must first strip off the false mantle of religion, exposing Islam as a mercenary & martial predator preying on the human race.  Once exposed and defrocked, Islam can be removed from the penumbra of protection offered by the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause, its institutions closed and Allah’s slaves expelled & excluded.

Please do your part by sharing this blog post with as many people as you can hope to influence. Take the second step by signing the International Qur’an Petition, emailing it to your Representative & Senators.

February 10, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Reform, Political Correctness | , , , , , , | Leave a Comment

Innocence of Islam Full Production ? Yes, it is true!


Bare Naked Islam
embedded this video in a post. It runs 74 minutes, is
claimed to be the full production of Innocence of Muslims.  Lets
get it rolling! Cross post, & share, download and save a copy if
you can.  The truth must prevail!!!

Documentation of the truth of the trailer:

http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the

September 17, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Radicalism?, Islamic Terrorism, Political Correctness | , | Leave a Comment

Innocence of Muslims Update: Obamination


http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/09/12/remarks-president-deaths-us-embassy-staff-libya

Since our founding, the United States
has been a nation that respects all faiths.  We reject all efforts
to denigrate the religious beliefs of others.  But there is
absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence.
None.  The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these
brutal acts.

 

respects all faiths

Respect is given where respect is due.  Do we
respect the Mafia?  Then why should we respect Islam, which began
as an Arab crime syndicate?  I direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers to another blog post which details with full documentation
Moe’s mission & motivation: Islam’s Mercenary Mission.

Is a belief system whose deity demands “great slaughter” as its Profit’s price of
admission to Paradise worthy of respect?  Does any sane
person respect a predatory way of life whose “original religion” is Jihad?

Does any believing Christian respect a faith that
denies the deity, crucifixion, death & resurrection of Jesus
Christ, depicts him as inferior to its Profit and reveres him as a genocidal warlord who will complete their genocide of the Jews?

denigrate beliefs

How is it possible to blacken that which is already
black?  What pious person who believes in the Almighty Creator
would follow a “Prophet” who, after the commencement of his ministry, married
the six year old daughter of his bosom buddy, raped a prisoner of war and commissioned the murders of his critics?

In Shari’ah,
slander is anything the listener does not like.  In our legal
system, truth is an absolute defense against slander and
defamation.  “Innocence of Muslims” depicts Moe as a megalomaniac.
Was he a megalomaniac, or does the video defame him? To discover the
answer, turn to this appendix of quotes in The Prophet of Doom and read
relevant quotes from Ishaq, Tabari, the Qur’an & Sahih Bukhari: http://prophetofdoom.net/Islamic_Quotes_Megalomania.Islam

The video depicts Moe as a lustful lecher; is it
true or does it defame him? http://prophetofdoom.net/Islamic_Quotes_Lust.Islam
The video depicts Moe as a warmonger; is it true or does it defame
him?  http://prophetofdoom.net/Islamic_Quotes_Jihad.Islam

The video depicts Moe as insane or demon possessed;
is it true or does it defame him?  http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.45.5

The video depicts Moe as suicidal; was he suicidal or does it defame
him?  http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.46.3

The video depicts Moe as faking the Qur’an; did he
fake it or does it defame him?  Why don’t you consult his child
bride for the real answer? Her answer is in Sahih Bukhari 3.30.311. ” I feel that your Lord
hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires.”

Watch the trailer; the casting, acting and
production values leave something to be desired, but the content is
accurate.  I have provided links to the Noble Qur’an, Sahih
Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, Sunan Abu Dawud, Tafsir Ibn Kathir and The
Prophet of Doom  so that you can determine the truth for
yourself.

In a just and rational world, documenting the
absolute evil of Islam’s founder and the continuing war crime he
founded would not be left up to amateurs, it would be done by our
government, to the highest professional standards and distributed world
wide as our best weapon in the “war on terrorism”.  Defeating Islam requires breaking their faith.
Exposing their profit and demon is the first step in that process. Our
government should be doing it, not bitterly bitching about it!

September 13, 2012 Posted by | free speech, Islam, Islam Distorted?, Political Correctness | , , , | Leave a Comment

Pastor terry Jones in the Liar’s Den: an Exposure of Islam through Refutation of Lies


This video was posted on Facebook, it dates from last year, but the
issues raised in it are current because Pastor Jones is protesting the
death sentence of Iranian Pastor Youcef Nadarkhani and will
burn Qur’ans and images of Moe if he is not set free by April 28.
Pastor Jones has also declared International Judge Muhammad Day to be
celebrated September 11th.

Pastor Terry Jones walked into the liar’s den about a year ago and
submitted to a spew of lies, distortions & insults.  The
adversaries spew great volumes of malignant malarkey,  Pastor
Jones gets little  chance to refute the multitudinous lies.
Notice
that Jones  listens patiently to their screeds but they interrupt
him when he tries to answer their malignant accusations.

Unfortunately, Pastor Jones is insufficiently
informed and articulate; unable to smoothly & quickly  refute
the rapid fire spew of deception coming from his adversaries: Sayed
Hassan Al-Qazwini & Reverend Edwin Rowe .

It is difficult to absorb and think critically about
the important
issues raised when the spew of malignant malarkey flows by so rapidly.
Because of
the target rich environment provide by the spew of lies, I have
attempted to transcribe the critical remarks of the principle
participants in the row, minus the comments of the token lawyer.
Due to my poor auditory acuity and miserable typing skills, this will
not be perfect word for word, but will be close enough to communicate
the main points.   Please read their words carefully and
examine the evidence I will submit in my commentary to follow.

I have highlighted some crucial words & phrases
and linked them to my comments. Click the highlighted expressions to go
directly to my comment and use your back button to return to your place
in the text.

 You have ignited a firestorm,
you
have insulted
millions of people around the world and here in detroit.
What are you trying to do and why here?

 

We are going to continue to try to
raise awareness here in America and around the world.

As you might be aware of, I spent thirty years as a
missionary in Europe, during that time I saw the growth of radical
Islam.  What we are trying to do is raise an awareness of jihad,
of Shari’ah; we are trying to raise that awareness here in
America.

As we have said many times we have come here to
Dearborn in the spirit of peace, we are not demonstrating against the
rights of Moslems, we are not demonstrating against the mosque there,
we are not demonstrating against the Koran.  The Moslems in this
country, if they have come here legally, if they have been born here,
if they have converted to Islam, then they are of course
welcome here,

The only thing  we ask is that they honor
and obey and submit to the Constitution of the United
States.  If
they are willing to do that then our message to them is one of
welcome.  If they have come here with a secret hidden agenda which
is definitely possible–we have seen that in Europe.

Moslem leaders here in America have spoken
out; said that they would like to have Shari’ah be a governing force in
certain domestic issues, then our message is to them that they are not
welcome.

If they have come here as I say, to honor and obey;
submit to the Constitution of the United States, then that is fine. We
are just concerned about that radical element:
we are concerned about
jihad and we are concerned about Shari’ah.

 

Imam  Al-Qazwini, you lead the
largest mosque in North America;  what do you want Terry Jones to
know about Islam?

 

Well, first of all I would like to ask
Pastor ‘Terry Jones to define for us what it is
that he means when he
speaks about Shari’ah.

 

Well, what I actually mean–I’m talking
about any form of government; whether it be Shari’ah, my knowledge of
that is of course somewhat limited, but I realize that it  is a
very brutal form of punishment. It involves stoning, it involves other
very cruel forms of punishment

But it not only has to do with Shari’ah, whether it
be any other  religion that has any form of governmental force
adapted to it–connected to it, then, of course, we are against
that.

We believe that the United States can only be
governed by the Constitution.  As I said, I spent thirty years in
Europe, I traveled around the world–I have seen and believe that the
United States of America is the greatest country in the world.
But it is only great because we have the Constitution. One of the
great aspects of that Constitution is the freedom of speech.
[Crosstalk.]

 

But I don’t think that the Imam would
disagree with you.

 

No., definitely.

 

Then of course we have no
problem.

 

Why then this problem, Pastor Terry
Jones, why this commotion you are causing in the world and in
Florida?  You burned the Koran three weeks ago and of course you
live in a free country and you are entitled to your opinion and every
action you do.  But for someone who calls himself a Pastor,
someone who speaks in the name of Jesus–Jesus was a great messenger
who asked his followers to  embrace others–to love his enemies–
and I think someone who calls himself Pastor
–I don’t think you have moral grounds to burn the Koran, a divine
book that respects and glorifies
Jesus whom you speak in
his name..  If you read the Koran that you burned three weeks
ago–one month ago, you will find out that almost on every page in the
Koran there is a verse in the Koran glorifying Jesus, so I feel
what you did three weeks ago was an insult against Jesus;
against your own faith because if you
really believe in Jesus then the Koran glorifies Jesus.  so when
you burn the Koran you are insulting Jesus.   That’s insulting
Christianity.

 

Lets look at Shari’ah law as we
understand it, here is a definition  “Law based on the Koran that
lays down certain duties and penalties for Muslims.  “But its much
more than that, Imam.

 

I think what Pastor Jones needs to
know–he needs to get educated. of the meaning of the words he is
talking about.

It seems that he is well misinformed  bout
things he has been talking about without having an accurate
understanding of them.

 

Have you read the Koran?

 

I have read parts of the Koran but
there is no doubt I have never claimed to be an expert on the
Koran.  But there are experts all around the world who definitely
have the same opinion…[Crosstalk.]

 

Well, here’s an expert right now right
next to you.

 

That the Koran can, at times, lead to
violent terrorist activities, but that’s not the point.  The point
is I am making a statement- I am warning against Shaari’ah and against
jihad– that is a very valid point and that is what we are willing to
do if there is no such thing.  [Crosstalk.]
But in so doing are you not labeling
everyone who…

 

Absolutely not! I made that very very
clear; we have talked before, I have made it very clear thet there are
probably millions
of Moslems who are peaceful, who do not desire
that.   But there is a radical element of Islam that can not
s be denied.  We are not saying he is radical, we are not saying
that the Islamic Center here is radical, we are not saying the Moslems
in Dearborn are radical but there is no doubt about it, ah, there is
radical– we burned a book on March the  twentieth, we burned a
book –seven thousand miles away–it is a book–I do not care how holy
you think it is; it is still a book; it is not flesh and blood, it does
not live, it does not breathe, we burned a book and seven thousand
miles away people were killed, so something is definitely wrong.
[Crosstalk.] What we are saying is we are demonstrating against that.

 

Do you feel you have blood on your
hands; because of what you did here in the U.S.A. twelve innocent
people were killed ?

 

Oh, absolutely not.  What we do
believe, we believe those people and those governments should be held
accountable.

We believe that our President, who has done a very poor job so far, we
believe that our President should not only speak out against the
radical element of Islam, we have got to call these countries to
accountability in the U.N. Pakistan, Afghanistan, Indonesia; they have
to change their laws–to adapt their laws to human rights or they
should be removed from the U.N.

 

Reverend Rowe, let me bring you in here
because there are zealots in every faith; he calls himself a Christian,
so do you, you read the same Bible ; why the a difference in attitudes?

 

Well, I am here because I am not trying
to defend violence anywhere on the part of the Christian Taliban
or
anybody else; I am here to say that what happened burning the Koran did
not just burn the Koran, it burned the Sermon on
the Mount, it burned
every statement that Jesus made about loving
enemies,
about … if you
think people are your
enemies, whether its Shari’ah law or whatever it
is, the statement is very clear, “you have heard it said you shall love
your neighbor and hate your enemy but I say to you: love your enemies
and pray for those who persecute you.”

I don’t happen to think that I have the same enemies
you do, but if those are your enemies, the worst thing that happens
here is that somebody might think that Christianity actually supports
what you did.

I am here to say that there is nothing in the Gospel
that I read that  that supports the burning of the Koran
and, if
you knew what was happening; given what happened on September 11th,
you
had to know there  would be violence as a result of the burning; I
think the blood is on your hands, for every ounce that was spilled,
because if you knew that your act was gonna create violence,
then the
violence is your violence .

You can not just duck it and say that someone else
did the killing when you knew that your act was going to create the
killing.

and I think that, in fact, you burned a whole lot more than the Koran,
you burned
So I think first of all we have to say I don’t own your version of
Christianity at all every
statement of Jesus Christ about
non-violence.

We just came out of Holy Week in which Jesus walked
into a very violent city on a donkey in peace and the peaceful Jesus
that I know would never have done what you did. And you knew, because
of  all the outpouring of September 11th, that it was going
to create death and I that death is on [Crosstalk.]

 

That’s an important question and you
call yourself a Christian; would Jesus Christ have done what you
did?

 

converted to Christianity.  They
brought books that they thought were dangerous, they brought magic
books, Well
I think for one thing we’re definitely getting sidetracked and another
thing; I think definitely that he would.  In Acts 19:19 we see
very clearly that people [brought book] sworth great sums of money and
they burned
them.

We see Jesus went into the Temple; threw out the
money changers.  We see every t8ime in the Old Testament that a
new King, a Godly King, came into place, he went down and tore down the
high places.

But I think we are missing the point: we are here
not to burn the Koran, we are not here to discuss the burning of the
Koran, we are here to send a very clear message to the radical element
of Islam: that is our message. Just a few months ago we talked about
burning the Koran and then there is violence. Radical Islam does not
need an excuse.  Coptic Christians came out of their churches
after a service, and they were just simply killed. We have to
remember the radical element of Islam has been killing people for
hundreds and hundreds of years.  Every single thing [Crosstalk.]

 

We are talking about that radical
element.

 

But why choose a place of peace to
stage that protest?  We are going to talk more about that; about
the legal issues involved when we come back…

 

A wonderful demonstration today: Jews
Muslims, Christians joined hands together at the Mosque today. And yet
there are many Americans who fear Islam and what it represents.
I believe they fear Islam because of
people like Pastor Terry Jones who are working on their paranoia, who
are making monster  out of Islam.  I would respectfully ask
Pastor Terry Jones to go and read the Koran instead of burning the
Koran and he would be amazed and surprised from the commonalities that
exist between Islam and Christianity.

The Problem is Pastor Jones has not read the Koran,
he has no knowledge of the Koran therefore he is trying to make a
monster out of the Koran and by that he is terrifying
Americans
from
Islam and by telling them that Islam is the danger.

Now no one is denying that there are radicals in
Islam as there are radicals in Christianity; I consider him one of the
radicals in
Christianity.


We have people like Timothy McVeigh who
killed
hundreds of innocent people in Oklahoma ten-fifteen years ago in the
name of Jesus.  We have people who committed all kinds
of
heinous
crimes in the name of the church and in the name of Jesus, peace be
upon him.  Would I hold Christianity responsible for that? No! I
am not going to do that because I understand in every faith there is a
fringe group who use
religion for their own interest and Islam is no
exception.  Why
I would hold 1.5 billion Muslims responsible for
the acts of a small fringe group that has been distorting Islam? 

But that does not mean Islam should be held responsible for
them.       We all agree that there are people
who have hijacked
Islam and gave it a bad name.  So I would invite
Pastor Jones to learn about the Koran, learn about Islam and be able to
distinguish between those fringe groups who in no way would represent
the mainstream of Islam; a divine faith
that
has so much to offer to
this world and to humanity.  The divine faith that speaks highly
of Christianity and of Judaism.

We in our religion believe that someone who does not
believe in Jesus, who does not believe in Moses he can not claim to be
Muslim, so in order to be a true Muslim you have to embrace Jesus and
his message; you have to embrace Moses and his message and it seems
that Pastor Jones  does not get that.

Now I want to go back to the Shari’ah law that he
has been talking about.  We ask him how does he define the
Shari’ah law; he says that he thinks the Shari’ah law is the brutal
punishment.  Now what brutal punishment
is he talking about?
Is he speaking about the stoning?  Now let me, for his reference,
the stoning was
referred to in the Bible, not in the Koran.

Now, if he is talking about what the Taliban did in
Afghanistan fifteen years ago,  when they were stoning people:
well, Taliban does not represent Islam, everyone

knows that the Taliban rule does not represent the spirit of
Islam.  I am someone who numerous times condemned what Taliban did
against people in Afghanistan and I said that these people are
self-declared religious leaders who are not recognized by the
mainstream of Islam, so he can not also hold Islam responsible for the
act of Taliban in Afghanistan when they were stoning people.

Here in America we have six million Muslims; I
challenge pastor Jones if he can bring me one Muslim in the United
States  who would say that we have not abided by the U.S.
laws.  All these Muslims are abided by the U.S. laws, so let me
ask him this, of course: there is a reference to the stoning in the
Bible, does that mean the Christian in the United States now are
calling for implementing stoning in the United States?  This is, I
think, the wrong analogy.  So I believe that his understanding of
the Shari’ah law is definitely distorted, he does not have accurate
understanding of what he is telling people; what he is talking about.

He can demonstrate against radical Islam,
that’s his right he can do that and he is entitled to do that but I
also would like to ask him, as I always do when I talk about extremism
and radicalism in other faiths,  that I would condemn radicalism
and extremism in my faith first so he has to do the same thing when he
talks about radicals and he means to rally people against radical
Islam, would he also do the same thing by rallying people against
radical Christians?  Would he tolerate those who go and blow up
abortion clinics here, what he would call them?  are
these
radicals; why would he not not speak out against them, why he chose to
be silent about those
radicals who call themselves Christians but he only chose to attack
those who call themselves radicals in Islam.  So I think this is a
double standard and someone who calls himself Pastor and religious leader; he has
to take the higher ground.

 

Let me ask both of you: what do you
call someone who straps a bomb to himself to kill innocent people; do
you call them martyrs or do you call them terrorists?

 

I call them murderer; the Koran that
Pastor Jones burned three weeks ago calls these people murderer and the
Koran is very clear that if you kill one innocent person you will be
viewed by God as if you have killed the entire mankind.   So
of course, someone who kills innocent people
is considered a murderer
in the eyes of God.

And by the way, I would like to take this
opportunity to condemn the killings that took place in Afghanistan
three weeks ago  when Pastor Terry Jones burned the Koran.
But I want to say one thing: When Pastor Terry Jones those who
committed that crime and I unequivocally condemn that attack, it was
carried out by lunatic Muslims, these people are not normal people,
these people are lunatics, but who pushed them to do that; someone who
calls himself Pastor, someone
who calls himself religious leader, he pushed them to do that, so yes,
I agree that his …there is blood on his hands for pushing these
lunatics to kill those innocent people at the United nations
Headquarters in Afghanistan and I hold him also partially responsible
for these killings.  .

Ok, Reverend jones, your
response?

 

yeah, sure,  since 9/11 theres
been over seventeen thousand successful terrorist attacks.  I mean
to hold us responsible for what someone does seven thousand miles

away is totally ridiculous.  You can see that in our own American
History, in our recent history we had the movement by Reverend Martin
Luther King Jr.  During that movement, many people were killed but
nobody would say it was Reverend martin Luther King Jr.’s fault.

I think that the Imam–I think that the problem
there
is they talk the talk but they don’t walk the walk,  they talk all
this peace but there’s really no proof of that.

As he said, here in America you have seven million;
you have nine million, so as long as they are in the minority of course
what are they gonna say? “We wanna rise up; we wanna take over”?
“Islam means submission, world domination”, is that what they are going
to say?

He’s not saying that.

 

I didn’t say he, I said they.  Is
that what they are going to say? No! You look at Moslem dominated
countries, its not important what a minority says in another country as
long as that minority is a minority, it is important [Cross talk. ]
it is important what a minority does when it becomes a majority; how
does it then treat the minority under them?  And in Islam
dominated countries; in Koran dominated countries, we do not see this
peace, peace peace, [Cross talk.]

 

Is what you are doing the way to treat
minorities in this country?  I’m not so sure it is.

 

Reverend Rowe, you heard Reverend Jones
compare himself to Martin Luther King.

 

Yeah, I think its blasphemy; I think it
is an absolute lie and its a lie on Jesus and not just Martin Luther
King and what he died for, he was non violent.  The act of burning
the Koran was a violent
act; he can’t duck that, the people who died
died and he knew that that violence was going to happen.  I think
that blood is on his hands and for him to even say the word Martin
Luther King and the non violent movement that had to do with martin
Luther King–its simply blasphemy and its Islamophobia; its right up
there with racism.  I tell you this man is lying about
Christianity, he’s lying about Martin Luther King and he’s lieing
about Islam.  he didn’t just burn the Koran, he burned the Sermon
on the Mount. 
He burned everything I believe in
when he did that
and everything the Imam believes in  and everything that Judaism
believes in and he sits here trying to protect us from a force that
does not exist.   Can you name one neighborhood in this
city or in this country that is [under] Shari’ah law? Can you name one
person who us under
Shari’ah law? I can’t and you can’t either. He has
created a fear that has nothing to be afraid of and so  that he
can get attention and we’re here because the media is gonna [Cross
talk.]

 

You can settle this right now.  On
Let it Rip, you can agree, to tomorrow, go into the Mosque, join hands
with the Imam and the people there and rally for peace. Will you try to
do that instead of denouncing Islam tomorrow?

 

No, we will not, but we can invite him
to come and join us against terrorism, against the radical element,
against whatever he wants to call it, he can come and join us because
he is [Cross talk.]

ignited a firestorm

Pastor Jones did nothing of the sort; he held a four
hour trial of the Qur’an, found it guilty of incitement to genocidal
violence and sentenced it to burning. His associate, Pastor Sapp
burned  the Qur’an.

The subsequent riots were not caused by the trial
& burning, they resulted from incendiary sermons at Jumah Salat.
The rabble were roused to riot by their Imams, not by Pastor Jones.

insulted millions

Pastor Jones accurately described the Qur’an, the
doctrines enshrined in it and the violence it incites. Muslims perceive
insult because they are heavily invested in Islam.  Islam is given
to them as the ultimate in good: guidance to faith in Allah, peace,
prosperity & justice.  In reality, it is enslavement to Satan,
a life of barren poverty and predation upon the human race.

welcome here

No sane person who knows what Islam is and what
Muslims are & do will welcome them here, regardless of their
birthplace, citizenship or immigration status.  Islam is a way of
life, not a religion. The deen of Islam is couched in terms of religion
in order to conceal its true nature.  The “original religion” of Islam is jihad.  Jihad is “war against non-Muslims“.

Believers are only
those who “strive with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh“.  Muslims are under Allah’s threat of eternal damnation if they do not engage
in jihad.  Engaging in jihad is their get out of Hell free card
which will save them from a “painful torment“.

Muslims who “take
any step“
to injure or enrage disbelievers are promised extra credit towards an
upgrade to their seat in Allah’s Celestial Bordello. Islam’s founding
Profiteer declared that he was “made victorious with terror“.  Muslims are commanded
to emulate a terrorist.

Moe got his income with his spear. Moe was made
wealthy “through conquests“.  Do you welcome the
presence of people who esteem him as the best and greatest of men and consider him to be
their role model?


obey the Constitution

Islam rejects man made laws including the
Constitution. Only Allah’s Shari’ah
is acceptable to Islam.  The Qur’an is their constitution; the
hadith are their laws.  Compare the table of contents of Sahih Bukhari to the that of Reliance of the Traveller.
Cruel & unusual punishments are unconstitutional, but lapidation,
amputation & lashing are required by Shari’ah.  The two are
not compatible; they are polar opposites.

radical element

That phrase offends me because it is supremely
dishonest.  Postulating the existence of a “radical element”
assumes the existence of a “moderate” mainstream Islam opposed to
“radicalism” or “extremism”.  Jihad is not radical, it is
mainstream: “ordained
for” Muslims though they “dislike it”.

Terrorism is not “radical”, it is mainstream.
Allah said that he would “cast
terror” and that he “cast terror” so that “a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them)
you made captives“  Allah commanded Muslims to treat victims
harshly so as to “strike
terror” into future victims.  he commanded Muslims to maximize
the strength of their army to “terrify
thereby” the enemies of Allah.   How was moe “made
victorious”?

The Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides were
not “radical”, they were mainstream. Allah set “great
slaughter” as Moe’s price of admission to his Celestial
Bordello.  Moe slaughtered 800 Jews who had surrendered after a two week siege.

define Shari’ah

Literally: “path to life giving waters”. It is
Islamic law, founded on Allah’s permissions, prohibitions &
imperatives in the Qur’an, exemplified by Moe’s sunnah and extended by
the consensus of the Ulema.  The most widely accepted codification
of Shari’ah is Reliance of the Traveller, a 1251 page volume
which you
can obtain from Amazon.  In many aspects, it is the most detailed
though Hedaya excells it in a few, such as rules related to sexual
intercourse with slaves.  Hedaya has been summarized in two
volumes which can be obtained from Amazon or read on the web, but it is
arcane, archaic and dense.  I recommend reading the first two
chapters of Volume II, Book IX. beginning with page 140 where you will see the rules of war
confirmed and amplified.

If you prefer shorter, easier to read books, turn to Risala, the Maliki school’s fiqh.

divine book

Moe claimed that he received the Qur’an from Allah,
through Jibril.  Of course, nobody else saw or heard Jibril.
There are a few things Muslims do not want you to know about how Moe
received his inspiration & revelations.  Moe had epileptic
seizures: snorting like a young camel, sweating, quivering lips & tongue.

Sometimes revelations came in dreams, sometimes he heard a voice and sometimes he heard a bell ringing in his
head. He received revelations while in bed with Aisha, but not with his other wives.  Aisha was wise
to him: “It seems to me that your Lord hastens to satisfy your
desire.”.

glorifies Jesus

The Qur’an denies the patrimony,
deity ["not more than a slave"], crucifixion, death & resurrection of
Jesus.  In one hadith, Moe depicts Jesus as inferior to himself, unworthy to intercede for sinners.  In
another hadith, Jesus is depicted as a genocidal warlord who will
“fight the people” for the cause of Allah and
destroy Christianity. Ibn Kathir, in his tafsir of Surah Al-A’raf 7:167,
informs us that just before the end of the world, “In the future, the
Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary,
will kill the Jews.
“:

The Qur’an contains 113 surahs; Jesus is mentioned
in 19 of them.  Surah Al-Baqarah, the longest of surah, contains
286 ayat, of which #s 87, 156 & 253 mention Jesus.


insult against Jesus

.      Sayed Hassan Al-Qazwini insulted the
intelligence of the  Fox 2 audience  by asserting that
burning a blasphemous text which deprecates Jesus is an insult against
Jesus and Christianity.  Allah denies paternity; insulting God by
claiming to be him, insulting Jesus by denial of his deity and
insulting Christians by denial of the tenets of our faith.
Burning a book which insults Jesus is not an insult to Jesus..

peaceful Muslims

Muslims who abjure offensive  conquest
insult  Allah and Islam by denying that Allah knows best.  War against non-Muslims is ordained for Muslims.  Islam is inseverable,
an all or nothing package deal: “Then
do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest?
Then what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except
disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they
shall be consigned to the most
grievous torment.”

The Muslim who does not go to war when called is
going to Hell.  “If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will
replace you by another people”.  “He who does not join the warlike expedition (jihad),
or equip, or looks well after a warrior’s family when he is away, will be smitten by Allah with a sudden calamity.”

Why does any peace loving person worship a demon who
plans to damn him for shirking offensive conquest?  You love
peace, Allah loves war; what do you have in common? Why do you
remain enslaved to him?

Christian Taliban

Taliban means “students of the Qur’an”.  The
Qur’an is an anti-Christian text; Christians read it to know their
enemy. Taliban whip and stone adulterous women, amputate the hands of
thieves and poison school girls.  What Christians do those
things?

Sermon on the Mount

If Pastor Jones burned the Sermon on the Mount, then he
burned the Bible.  No, he burned the Qur’an!  Show me the
Surah & ayeh containing the Sermon on the Mount; I want to see it!
My search for it was unsuccessful.

loving enemies

In which Surah & Ayeh does the Qur’an contain
Christ’s command to love your enemies?  Where does Allah emulate
it?  Show me; I want to verify it!

How do you square “love your enemies with” “to terrify thereby the enemy of God and your enemy”  Which book did Pastor Jones
burn?

your enemies

Reverend Rowe, are people who curse
Christians your enemies?  Is a  god who intends to take
Muslims out of Hell and replace them with Christians your enemy? Is a god
who curses
Christians your enemy?

Gospel supports burning

Did you search the Book of Acts?  19:19 Many of them also which used curious arts
brought their books together,
and burned them before all
men: and they counted the price of them, and found it fifty thousand
pieces of silver.

September 11

Exactly what did we do to provoke the accursed
abomination?  Exactly what did the founders do, between 1776 and
1815, to provoke the Barbary Pirates?  Did you know that the
Barbary Pirates said it was because it is written
in their laws?  Do you know where it is written in their laws?


create violence

Violence is created by those who engage in it, not
by Pastor Jones.  He did not tell anyone to riot. He did not urge
anyone to murder.  He tried, condemned and executed a book which
exhorts men to murder, wage war, rape and pillage.

On what day of the week did the riots occur?
At what time of the day did they occur?  On what day of the week
and what time of day do the Imams  deliver their
kutbah?   The same pattern was followed when Hell was raised
over the Motoons.

create the
killing

You are creating  killing, Reverend Rowe, by
giving Muslims carte blanche to raise Hell and project the blame onto
their critics; ‘Pastor Jones made us do it.’.

Christ: non-violence

Reverend Rowe, exactly where in the Qur’an do you
find Christ’s statements about non-violence?  Please cite the
Surah & ayeh numbers so we can look up the references.

What contravenes Christ’s teaching more than “Jihad
is ordained for you…”, “fight them until”, fight those who until”,
“kill them wherever you find them” and “fight those of the disbelievers
nearest you” ?

make a monster of the
Qur’an

The Qur’an is what it is: a hate & war manual;
we can make nothing of it, we can not change what it is.  Read it;
discover what it is and what it inculcates & incites.  I will
make it easy for you.

“It doesn’t say that; doesn’t mean that;
mistranslated &
misinterpreted.”  Prove it!!! Take your case up with the experts;
Islamic scholars:

Who knew the meaning of the Qur’an better than the
man who first recited it?  Is jihad inner struggle against your
ego or is it offensive conquest?  Read Sahih Bukhari’s Book of Jihad
and see for yourself.   What did the Profiteer say and do
about jihad?  Can you obtain a clue from the codified oral
traditions of Moe’s companions?

radicals in Christianity

In which New Testament book,  chapter &
verse did Jesus Christ command his disciples to wage offensive war,
engage in terrorism and commit genocide?  In which New Testament
book, chapter & verse did he exemplify such acts for his disciples
to emulate?

Moe did those things, Jesus did not; Muslims thus
engaged obey Allah and emulate Moe, Christians thus engaged contravene
the teaching of Jesus.

Timothy McVeigh

What did Tim say or do to involve Jesus in his
massacre?  Did he utter and publish a statement dedicating the
bombing to Christ?  Did he shout “Jesus is Lord!”?  What
evidence of religious motivation for the attack do you have?  Show
it!!!

use religion

Who would use religion for personao emolument? Who
would contrive a ‘religion’ for his personal emolument &
empowerment?  Who would contrive a ‘religion’ for the purpose of
accruing income, wealth and sex slaves?  Who did that???  To
whom do the spoils belong?  How could an impotent stone idol eat
looted food, ride looted camels or sport with captured women?
What was Moe’s prime motivating factor?  What did Allah promise
Moe?  What did Allah deliver?  How was Moe made
wealthy?  Who were spoils made lawful for?  Who received the
keys to the treasures of the world from Allah?

distorting Islam

What did Allah say about jihad?  What did Moe
say and do about jihad?  What did Allah say about terror?
What did Allah do about terror? What did Moe say and do about
terror? What does Shari’ah say about jihad?

Exactly what is Islam that terrorists have distorted
it?  If Islam is not what Allah & Moe said & did, then
what is it??

hijacked Islam

Who hijacked Islam? When and where did they hijack
Islam?  Read the questions asked and answers listed under the
heading distorting Islam and get a
clue.

divine faith

What is divine about Islam? How can the product of
hallucinatory seizures & situational scripture be divine?
Refer to the evidence linked under the heading of divine book above.

speaks highly of
Christianity

When spewing a rapid fire stream of malignant
malarkey in a half hour t.v. show with three other guests, it is easy
to get away with telling big lies.  Pastor Jones did not have
sufficient air time to refute that lie, but I can refute it in this
blog post.  Allah leaves no doubt about his attitude toward
Judaism & Christianity.  When Muslims attend the five
obligatory salat, they recite Surah Al-Fatiha 17 times each day,
reminding Allah why he wants to burn us.

  • 1:6.
    Guide us to the Straight Way

    1:7.
    The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of
    those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went
    astray (such as the Christians).

We “earned anger” & “went astray”. See how highly Islam speaks of
us?

Islam curses us, beyond the compulsory salat.

  • 2:161.
    Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it
    is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind,
    combined.
  • 9:30.
    And the Jews say: ‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians
    say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths.
    They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on
    them, how they are deluded away from the truth!

Islam curses us, that must be  high praise indeed.  It also
calls us the “worst of living creatures”.

  • 8:55. Verily, The worst of moving (living)
    creatures before Allâh are those who disbelieve , – so they shall not
    believe.
  • 98:6.
    Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and
    Prophet Muhammad ()) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and
    Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are
    the worst of creatures.


brutal punishment

Shari’ah prescribes the death penalty for apostasy
in Reliance of the Traveller Book O8.1. O14.1 prescribes amputation of the right hand for
theft.  O12.2 prescribes stoning for adultery.

stoning

Yes, lapidation is mentioned in the Bible, but not
in the Qur’an because a sheep ate the verse of rajab..

  • John 8:7
    So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto
    them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at
    her.
  • Sahih Muslim 17.4194
    has Caliph Umar verifying the recital of the verse of stoning and the
    fact that it was carried out in the time of the Profit.
  • Sunan Ibn Majah, Volume 3, page 113
    • 1944. It was narrated that

      ‘Ashah said: “The Verse of

      stoning and of breast feedmg an

      adult ten times was revealed, and

      the paper was with me under my

      pillow. When the Messenger of Allah died, we were

      preoccupied with his death, and a

      tame sheep came in and ate it.” (Hasan)

  • Sahih Muslim17.4196 and the immediate context
    indicated that Moe practiced lapidation.
  • See Sunan Abu Dawud 38.4339 for further confirmation.

Moe ordered lapidation, Jesus  stopped one;
which is morally superior?

blow up
abortion clinics

How many Christians shoot abortionists or blow up
their clinics?  How does the number of such incidents compare to
the number of terrorist attacks by Muslims?  In which New
Testament book, chapter & verse did Jesus command his disciples to
kill abortion doctors or bomb their clinics?

The accusation is a form of the argumentum tu-quoque
fallacy; a diversion, not a defense.  Nothing that any Christian
has done in contravention of the teaching of Jesus subtracts anything
from the intrinsic evil of Islam.

kills innocent people

Imam Al-Qazwini provided a prime example of kitman:
Islamic deception by obfuscation.  He slyly refers to Surah
Al-Ma’idah 5:32,
obscuring 5:33
which prescribes punishments for ‘waging war against Allah’.
What is the meaning of “wage war against Allah”?  For
the answer, we must turn to Tafsir Ibn kathir: “`Wage war’ mentioned here
means, oppose and contradict,
and it includes disbelief,
blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways.”

If you do not believe in Allah, you are waging war
against him: subject to decapitation, crucifixion, amputation or
expulsion; you are not innocent. Only
Muslims can be innocent. 

violent act

Detonating a bomb in a crowd is a violent act.
Shooting people is a violent act. Rioting is violent. Burning a book
which is your own personal property, under controlled conditions is not
a violent act. Pastor Jones did no harm in judging and destroying a
Qur’an. There is no logical connection between that act and the riots
incited by Imams in Afghanistan.

The outrageous hyperbole of Reverent Rowe serves to
give Muslims a free pass for anything they do; a ready excuse. They can
simply project their own evil intentions onto innocent, non-violent
people.

everything I believe in

What do you believe in, Reverend Rowe?
Christianity is defined in the Gospels, Acts & letters of the
Apostles, not in the Qur’an.  Islam portrays Jesus as a genocidal
warlord. If Pastor Jones burned what you believe in, then you are a
Muslim, not a Christian; an apostate and impostor.

under Shari’ah

In the last three decades, 50
trial and appellate cases involving Shari’ah have been heard in
American courts.

April 19, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Radicalism?, Islamic Terrorism, Jesus, Jihad, Liars, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment

The hypocrisy of Congressional Bigotry


The hypocrisy of Congressional Bigotry

Fatwa on Islam brought this video to my attention. I had read a little
about the controversy but had not delved deeply into it. I can’t let
this slide by without a blast of the torch. We find Christopher S.
Murphy on the floor of the House, wasting precious time.

December 19, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Radicalism?, Islamic Terrorism, Jihad, Political Correctness, Politics, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Istanbul Process: Censorship Through Subterfuge


Istanbul Process: Censorship Through Subterfuge

The
fall session of the Istanbul Process has concluded; while we await
publication of their report we can reflect on the manifold deceptions
which passed the lips of two participants.  I have selected the
most important phrases out of context for criticism.

It is not possible to advance respect for religious
freedom & tolerance where Allah’s writ runs. There is neither
tolerance nor respect for religions other than Islam in Egypt, Saudi
Arabia and other nations dominated by Islam.  The positive
attitudes desired by Amb. Cook do not  and can not exist there
because of the doctrines of Islam.

  • Non-Muslims are cursed.
    • 2:161.
      Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it
      is they on whom is the Curse
      of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind, combined      .
    • 3:12.
      Say (O Muhammad ) to those who disbelieve: “You will be defeated and gathered
      together to Hell      , and worst indeed is that place to rest.”
    • 9:30.
      And the Jews say:
      ‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians say: Messiah
      is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate
      the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on them, how
      they are deluded away from the truth!
  • Only Islam is accepted.
    • 3:19.
      Truly, the religion with Allâh
      is Islâm      .
      Those who were given the Scripture (Jews and Christians) did not differ
      except, out of mutual jealousy, after knowledge had come to them. And
      whoever disbelieves in the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, signs,
      revelations, etc.) of Allâh, then surely, Allâh is Swift in calling to
      account.
    • 3:85.
      And whoever seeks a religion
      other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him      , and in the
      Hereafter he will be one of the losers.
  • Unbelief is a great evil under Shari’ah..
    • Unbelief is the vilest
      form of corruption      , as goes without saying. [Reliance of the
      Traveller O24.2
    • Leaving Islam is the
      ugliest form of unbelief       (kufr) and the worst. [08.0]
    • …a non-Muslim has no
      right to authority       and hence no right to raise a Muslim. [M13.2]
      • false
        divide that pits religious sensitivities against freedom of expression
        [Quoting H.C.]

For the full quote, turn to page 35 of the April ’11 Islamophobia Report.
Hillary’s assertion is malignant. Islam demands that all criticism of
Islam be squelched, which is clear in the text of previous HRC & GA
resolutions “Combating Defamation of Religions“.

Reliance of the Traveller defines apostasy with a
list of twenty acts which entail leaving Islam [O8.7]
Those acts include reviling Allah, Muhammad or Islam and denial of any
Islamic law or doctrine.  The penalty for apostasy is execution,
specified in the second section of chapter 8. [O8.1]
The same rule and punishment are imposed upon conquered Jews &
Christians living in Dar ul-Islam as Dhimmis: -5- or mentions something impermissible
about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or
Islam. [O11.10]
The penalty imposed upon a Dhimmi who blasphemes is the same as he
would suffer when captured in battle, one of four choices by the Imam,
death being the first listed. [O9.14]

The OIC demanded prosecution of the publisher of the
Motoons and demanded that the Dutch government block the publication of
Fitna. After the publication, they demanded prosecution. Egypt is
demanding that publication of Wilders’ upcoming book be blocked.

      • Resolution
        16/18 secured an international consensus around an action-oriented
        approach to combat religious intolerance in line with respect for
        universal human rights—including religious freedom and freedom of
        expression.

“Respect for freedom of expression” yeah, right. The
following paragraph occurs on page two of the resolution:

Expresses deep concern at the continued
serious instances of derogatory

stereotyping, negative
profiling and stigmatization of persons based on their religion or

belief, as well as programmes
and agendas pursued by extremist organizations and groups

aimed at creating and
perpetuating negative stereotypes about religious groups, in
particular

when condoned by Governments;

“Derogatory stereotyping ” & “negative stereotypes”  are
encrypted references to  associating Islam with
terrorism.  Last year’s GA resolution expresses it this
way:

Also emphasizes that no religion should be equated with
terrorism, as this

may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom
of religion

or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned;

Oh, but that meme has been abandoned, hasn’t it?  Yeah, right. Two
resolutions came out of the Third Committee in November, one based on
19/18 and

A/C.3/66/L.48/Rev.1 : “Elimination of all forms of
intolerance and of discrimination based on religion or belief”.

Also emphasizes that no religion should
be equated with terrorism, as this

may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom
of religion

or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned;

Islam = terrorism because Allah said that he would
cast terror, did cast terror & Moe said that it made him
victorious.  I present to you relevant, verifiable proof from the
Qur’an, Tafsir Ibn Kathir & Sahih Bukhari, the most authentic of
the six canonical hadith collections.

  • 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those
    who disbelieve
  • 7:4.  How many a township have We
    destroyed! As a raid
    by night    , or while they slept at noon, Our terror came unto them.
    • Our torment came upon them by
      night or while they were taking their midday nap. ) means, Allah’s
      command, torment and vengeance came over them at night or while taking
      a nap in the middle of the day. Both of these times are periods of rest
      and leisure or heedlessness and amusement.  Nations that were destroyed
  • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the
    angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I
    will cast terror into the hearts of those
    who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all
    their fingers and toes.”
    • …(I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have
      disbelieved.)
      means, `you — angels — support the believers, strengthen their
      (battle) front against their enemies, thus, implementing My command to
      you. I will cast
      fear, disgrace and humiliation over those who defied My command and
      denied My Messenger      ,
      (so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers
      and
      toes.) strike them on their foreheads to tear them apart and over the
      necks to cut them off, and cut off their limbs, hands and feet….Allah commands the Angels to fight and support the
      Believers
  • 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to
    the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into
    (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others
    besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye
    shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall
    not be treated unjustly.
  • 33:26. And those of the people of the
    Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allah brought them down
    from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so
    that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made
    captives.
    • (and cast terror into their
      hearts       ;) means fear, because they had
      supported the idolators in their war against the Messenger of Allah and
      the one who knows is not like the one who does not know. They had
      terrified the Muslims and intended to kill them so as to gain earthly
      power, but their plans backfired; the idolators ran away and the
      believers were victorious while the disbelievers were losers; where
      they had aimed for glory, they were humiliated. The Campaign against Banu Qurayzah
  • 59:2.
    He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the
    Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Bani An-Nadir) from their
    homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get
    out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from
    Allah! But Allah’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they
    expected it not, and He cast terror into
    their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own
    hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with
    eyes (to see).
    • …Therefore, Allah
      sent His torment down on them      ;
      it can never be averted, and His appointed destiny touched them; it can
      never be resisted. The Prophet forced them to evacuate and abandon
      their fortified forts that Muslims did not think they would ever
      control. …Then take admonition, O you with eyes.) meaning,
      “Contemplate the end of those who defied Allah’s command, contradicted
      His Messenger and denied His Book. See how Allah’s humiliating torment
      struck them in this life, as well as, the painful torment that Allah
      has reserved for them in the Hereafter.”… The End that Bani An-Nadir suffered

  • 59:13. Of a truth ye are stronger (than they)
    because of the terror in their hearts, (sent) by
    God. This is because they are men devoid of understanding.
  • 8:57. So if you gain the mastery over them in
    war, punish them
    severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they
    may learn a lesson    .
    • …(then disperse those who are behind them,) by severely
      punishing
      ﴿the captured people﴾ according to Ibn `Abbas, Al-Hasan Al-Basri,
      Ad-Dahhak, As-Suddi, `Ata’ Al-Khurasani and Ibn `Uyaynah. This
      Ayah commands punishing them harshly and inflicting casualties on them.
      This way, other enemies, Arabs and non-Arabs, will be afraid and take a
      lesson from their end      ,… Striking Hard against Those Who disbelieve and break
      the Covenants
  •  Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:

    Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:

    The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given
    to any one else before me.

    1. Allah made me
    victorious by     awe, (by His
    frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey. .

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:

    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the
    shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror(cast
    in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the
    treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.    “
    Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you,
    people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not
    benefit by them).

“Programs and agendas pursued by extremist
organizations” is an encrypted reference to the Dutch and Austrian
Freedom Parties and the American Tea Party.  They want to make the
Tea Party and negative expressions about Islam in campaign
advertisements illegal. If you doubt this, read the April ’11 Islamophobia Report, pages 3, 6 & 49

      • calls
        on states to take specific measures to combat religious intolerance

The call comes on page 2 of the resolution.

Expresses its concern that incidents of religious intolerance, discrimination

and related violence, as well as of negative stereotyping of
individuals on the basis of

religion or belief, continue to rise around the world, and condemns, in
this context, any

advocacy of religious hatred
against individuals that constitutes incitement to

discrimination, hostility or
violence, and urges
States to take effective measures, as set forth

in the present resolution, consistent
with their obligations under international human rights

law, to address and
combat such incidents;

  • incidents of
    • intolerance: Islamophobia
    • negative stereotyping: Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of
      Islam :. Muslims are terrorists.
    • avocacy of religious hatred
      • constitutes incitement
        • discrimination
        • hostility
        • violence: any & every criticism of Islam, exemplified
          by Fitna, the Motoons & Qur’an burning
  • effective measures:  legislation and its enforcement

Article 19

1. Everyone shall have the right to hold
opinions without interference

2.
Everyone shall have the right
to freedom of expression: this right
shall include freedom to seek, receive, and impart information and
ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing
or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of this
choice

3.
The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and
responsibilities. It may therefore
be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such
as
provided by law and are necessary.

   (a) For respect of the rights
or reputations of others;

   (b) For the protection of
national security or of public
order (ordre public), or of public
health or morals.

Article 20

1. Any propaganda for war shall be
prohibited by law

2.
Any advocacy of national,
racial or religious hatred that constitutes
incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited
by law.

Reservations:

       ”(1)
That article 20 does
not authorize or require legislation or other action by the United
States that would restrict the
right of free speech and association protected by the
Constitution and laws of the United States.

Several of the resolutions make allusion to  19.3, attempting to
stretch 19.3.a to cover Islam.  Note that the U.S.A. reserved our
First Amendment right of free expression.  Several resolutions
bitterly kvetch about that reservation, demanding its repeal. The HRC
has an Ad Hoc
Committee on Elaboration of Complementary Standards
whose mission is to write a binding protocol which will insert the
provisions of previous defamation of Islam resolutions into one of the
human rights covenants.

Define advocacy of hatred that constitutes
incitement. Exactly what does that expression in 20.2 mean in the real
world.  For the answer, we must turn to the Secretary General.

.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban
said in a statement. “The right
of free expression is not at stake here.”

According to Ban, the short documentary by Geert Wilders meets the test
of 20.2. There is one little problem: Fitna is an exposure of
incitement, it is not incitement.  I direct doubters &
dissenters to this blog post which documents Fitna’s scriptural
citations: The intention of HRC 16/18 is to criminalize Fitna, the
Motoons, this
blog post and every criticism of Islam.

      • Those
        rights include the right to believe and the right practice a religion
        not sanctioned by the state — or no religion at all.

Who can argue with the right to belief &
practice of religion?  Islam does, and I can, too!  The
existence of a right to practice Islam is an impossibility because the
practice of Islam entails genocide, terror,plunder, extortion, &
rape. This fatal fact is fully documented here: 
No
Right to Practice Islam!

Allah said  that only he has the right to be
worshiped. Get a clue.

  • 3:2.
    Allâh! Lâ ilahâ illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He),
    the Ever Living, the One Who sustains and protects all that
    exists.
  • O11.5 -6- are forbidden to openly display
    wine or pork, (A: to ring
    church bells or display crosses    ,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud,
    or make public display of their
    funerals and feastdays;      -7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

Islam does not accept the UDHR,
it substituted the Cairo Declaration,
which makes Shari’ah the bottom line. I just quoted the relevant
Shari’ah for you. Get a clue: scroll to the end of the declaration and
read Articles 24 & 25.  Its Shari’ah, stupid, refer to
Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 11.5, quoted above.
Freedom of religion is a one way street: for Muslims only.

      • This
        purpose is to advance religious freedom, promote religious tolerance,
        and combat discrimination on the basis of religion or belief—consistent
        with universal human rights principles.

The purpose is permanently frustrated because Islam does not and will
not allow religious freedom or  tolerate religions  and
discriminates against indigenous religious minorities.
Those flaws are intrinsic to the core of Islam and can not be altered
or removed because Islam can not be reformed.

  • protect
    religious minorities and protect freedom of expression

Indigenous Christians in Egypt & Pakistan will
be charged with blasphemy and persecuted, up to and including execution
for saying “Jesus is Lord.”. HRC 16/18 does nothing to change Shari’ah
nor its implementation in Islamic nations and that is not its
intention.  Its stated mission is to prevent and punish “negative
stereotyping”, which is substituted for “defamation of religions”,
which was substituted for “defamation of Islam”. A skunk by any other
name will smell as pungent.  The resolution reeks, likewise the
clever words with which it is being disguised & promoted, which are
redolent of feces.

      •  some
        people distort various religious doctrines to justify intolerance,
        foment violence, or create strife that serves their narrow political
        purposes

Islam’s mission is to enrich its founder & his
successors through the professional practice of war and
extortion.  I direct doubters & dissenters to a previous blog
post for the disgusting details: Islam’s Mercenary Mission.
Genocidal jihad which terrorizes its victims is an intrinsic sacrament
of Islam, not a radical innovation.  I direct doubters &
dissenters to a previous blog post which exposes the disgusting
details: What’s
Wrong With Islam/Muslims? .

      • faith
        must never be a crime and religion must never be used as an excuse to
        stifle freedom of expression.

“Faith without works is dead.” and faith without
content is empty.  Faith ain’t the problem: doctrines are!
It is what they believe, not the fact that they believe. Faith produces
works; the works of Islam are genocidal conquest, rape, pillage &
extortion; this is why there can be No
Right to Practice Islam.

The objective of HRC 16/18 and its successor
before the GA is to criminalize and punish the publication of the facts
contained in this blog post. The OIC tried to block the publication of
Fitna. They are trying to block the publication of a new book by Geert
Wilders. They demanded that he be persecuted for Fitna.

  • Remarks at the Istanbul Process for Combating Intolerance and
    Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief

Hillary just told us that there is a right kill,
enslave, rape, plunder and extort disbelievers. Does she also
believe that there is a right to free expression? What did she say
about International Burn the Qur’an Day?  Did she uphold Rev.
Jones’ right to express his disdain for the damnable doctrines of Islam
by burning a Qur’an?  No, she condemned the planned event,
labeling it as hate speech and inciting violence, the same terms she
used to condemn the trial & burning of the Qur’an last March.

      • this
        resolution marks a step forward in creating a safe global environment
        for practicing and expressing one’s beliefs
      • In
        it, we pledge to protect the freedom of religion for all while also
        protecting freedom of expression.

There is no step toward religious freedom short of
eradicating Islam. Does Hillary plan to send the Marines to protect
Copts in Egypt?  No resolution will protect them!  Only
overwhelming force will prevent Muslims from killing members of
Christian minorities in Africa, Arabia & Asia.  Nobody
proposes to assemble and apply that force.

Islam can only be eradicated by inducing mass
apostasy.  Mass apostasy can only be induced by exposing the Ummah
to the glaring reality of the identity and attributes of Allah, the
character and works of Moe and the horrific crimes against humanity
perpetrated in Allah’s name over the last 14 centuries.

Previous resolutions demanded criminalizing
association of Islam with terrorism, an intrinsic sacrament of which
Moe bragged. Another resolution pending in the General Assembly demands
criminalizing equating Islam with terrorism.

      • born
        free to practice any religion, to change our religion, or to have none
        at all.

Open Reliance of the Traveller to Book O, Chapter 8
and start reading through 8.7; there is a link above. Who will go to
Pakistan and enforce the right to convert to Christianity?  Will
Hillary or Ban go?  Whom will they send; will they return alive
and whole from that mission?  You can not change the Qur’an &
sunnah on which O8.1 is based, so, exactly what will you do about it?

      • they
        are not rights bestowed by any government. They are rights endowed by
        our Creator within each of us. And therefore, we have a special
        obligation to protect these God-given rights.

Only the U.S. government has an obligation to
protect our rights.  Res. 16/18 is part of a campaign to
eviscerate our right to free speech. Hillary’s State department is
acting in contravention of the First Amendment.

      • restricting
        the practice of anyone’s faith is a threat to the human rights of all
        individuals.

Muslims believe that they have a divine right and religious
obligation to conquer
the entire world, by intimidation & force, including “casting
terror”. That right and obligation is inseverable; Islam
is all or nothing. Muslims who believe “fight in Allah’s cause, killing
others and being killed. Only
those who participate in jihad are believers. Muslims are commanded
to obey Allah and Moe.  Allah commanded them to “fight
the disbelievers nearest you“.  Open Sahih Bukhari 52 to see what Moe did, which is to
be emulated.  Terrorism is an act of worship, intrinsic to the
practice of Islam; Muslims earn Brownie
Points for any step taken to injure or enrage disbelievers.

Hillary just informed us that preventing Muslims
from engaging in terrorism is an infringement of their human right to
the free practice of religion. Muslims can not fully practice Islam
without it.

      • my
        ability to practice my religious faith freely does not, and indeed
        cannot, diminish yours

Your Methodism, Hillary, does not impair the
practice of Islam. A Muslim, practicing his religion can rape and kill
you as an act of worship.  Of course, that does not diminish your
rights at all, does it?

      • Religion
        can be such a powerful bond, but we also recognize that it can be
        misused to create conflict.

Creating conflict and perpetuating war are not
misuses of Islam, they are its mission.  Its jihad, stupid! The “original religion” of Islam is jihad and jihad is war against non-Muslims. Allah will curse
Muslims with disgrace if they abandon jihad for trade and
agriculture.

      • There
        are those who, for reasons actually having little to do with religion,
        seek to instill fear or contempt for those of another creed.

That is an obvious sideswipe at “Islamophobes”;
those of us who expose and warn others about the damnable doctrines
& practices of Islam.  Hillary implies that critics of Islam
are rousing the rabble to lynch Muslims.  If that was true, we
could and should be prosecuted.  In fact we are not, but far from
it.

      • So
        we believe that it is the duty of every government to ensure that
        individuals are not subject to violence, discrimination, or
        intimidation because of their faith or their lack of faith. 

The governments of Egypt, Pakistan and other Islam
dominated nations are active, willing participants in intimidation,
discrimination & persecution of indigenous Christian minorities and
turn a blind eye to Islamic violence.

      • At
        the same time, as we strive to protect individuals from violence and
        discrimination because of their religion or their beliefs, we must also
        express the freedom of expression.

Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of
Islam.  Muslims earn Brownie Points with each act of
terrorism.  9/11 was an act of worship.  The OIC seeks to
criminalize and punish the uttering and publishing of those fatal
facts.  The resolution they ran through the GA last year is clear
on that matter.  Res 16/18 focuses on incitement to hatred and
violence.  According to Ban Ki-Moon,  exposing the direct
connection between Islamic scripture, preaching and terrorism is hate
speech and incitement not protected by freedom of expression.  If
he had the power, Ban would prohibit the publication of this blog post.
The purpose of Res 16/18 is to con our government into doing it for
him.

      • Well,
        how would one know that you were being discriminated against if you
        didn’t have the right to freedom of expression?

The right of free expression is essential to
discussion of affairs of state; to political campaigns in
particular.  When we perceive a real, proximate and continuing
threat to our personal and national security, we must be free to warn
our fellow citizens.  When we are offended by the arrogant
exactions of enemy forces, we must be free to express our outrage and
contempt.  The resolution you seek to implement is designed to
eliminate our right to free speech.

      • So
        the freedom of religion and the freedom of expression are absolutely
        bound up together.

My right to warn of the damnable mission, doctrines
and practices of Islam does not, in any way impair anyone’s freedom of
religion.  If Muslims have a right to practice Islam, then all of
my rights are impaired.  The right to live and the right to
practice Islam can not coexist because Islam is a license to kill; a
declaration of open season in denial of the right to life and
property.  I direct doubters & dissenters to Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387.

      • Now,
        there are those who have always seen a tension between these two
        freedoms, especially when one person’s speech seems to question someone
        else’s religious beliefs, 

Open Reliance of the Traveller, the Shafi’ite
handbook of fiqh which serves as the main codification of Shari’ah, to
BookO11.10 and learn that Dhimmis can be killed for
mentioning
anything “impermissible” about Allah, Moe or Islam.

      • or
        maybe even offends that person’s beliefs.

      • But
        the truth we have learned, through a lot of trial and error over more
        than 235 years in our country, is that we defend our beliefs best by
        defending free expression for everyone, and it lowers the temperature.
        It creates an environment in which you are free to exercise and to
        speak about your religion, whether your neighbor or someone across the
        town agrees with you or not.
      •  In
        fact, the appropriate answer to speech that offends is more speech.

Speech that offends: “fight them until”, “fight
those who …until”, “I am commanded to fight”, “I will cast terror”,
“Allah cast terror” so that “some you killed” and others you “made
captive”. I am offended by the Qur’an, hadith, Exegesis & Shari’ah!
I am offended by shouts of  “Allahu akbar!”.  I am offended
by the accursed abomination 9/11 and every Islamic act of
terrorism.

This blog post, the hundreds of similar posts which
preceded
it and those that will follow it are my response to intolerable
evil.  My disrespectful demand that Islam be outlawed, Muslims
expelled and excluded from the U.S.A. is my response to intolerable
evil.  My curse that I will not vote for any candidate for high
office who does not explicitly condemn Islam is my response to
intolerable evil.

      • It
        is hurtful when bigotry pollutes the public sphere, 

Informed and reasoned opposition to &
denunciation of Islam, based on the facts contained in its canon of
scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence is not bigotry. The
hallmarks of bigotry are ignorance and a closed mind.

      • but
        the state does not silence ideas, no matter how disagreeable they might
        be, 

You just confessed, in context of Res.16/18, that
exposure & condemnation of Islam are disagreeable to you and that
you consider them to be bigotry.  You also lied, because the
state, in seeking to implement 16/18, seeks to criminalize & punish
all criticism of Islam.  You have, in fact, adopted
the  agenda of the enemy: to silence our messages of warning and
dissent.

      • because
        we believe that in the end, the best way to treat offensive speech is
        by people either ignoring it or combating it with good arguments and
        good speech that overwhelms it.

My side has the facts, Hillary. It is not possible
to refute our condemnation of Islam because what we say is supported by
ample evidence found in Islam’s canon.  You can not refute the
facts outlined in this blog post. You can lie about them, spew
ad-hominem & Tu-quoque, but you can not prevail with fact and logic
because Islam is intrinsically evil, by design and incapable of
reformation.

      • So
        we do speak out and condemn hateful speech.

You condemned Pastor Jones when he sponsored
International Burn the Koran Day.  You condemned him when he tried
and executed the Qur’an last March. You and General Petraeus betrayed
us, blaming Jones for Muslim riots stirred up among rabid rabble by
rabid Imams at Jumah Salat.  Jones did not incite violence. Jones
did not engage in hate speech. Jones did not violate anyone’s
rights.  When you accused Jones of inciting violence, you did, in
fact, incite violence by encouraging Muslims to riot.  I call
treason when I see it.  You and Obama should be impeached,
convicted of treason and removed from office.

      •  In
        fact, we think it is our duty to do so,
      •  but
        we don’t ban it or criminalize it.

Res. 16/18 is a continuation of the string of
resolutions spawned by the OIC’s Ten year Plan.  Scroll down to Art. VI,
item 3 and read about it.  Read Ekmeleddin
Ihsanoglu’s speech to the HRC Session 15 and Amb. Akram’s statement
to Session 16, which is transcribed in this blog post.  When we read those two
screeds and the Islamophobia Reports,  the intent of the
resolution is unmistakably clear.

Fasten your seat belts, this is where the going gets
rough. Put away all fire, choke and spill hazards before you continue
reading.

      • Now,
        with Resolution 1618, we have clarified these dual objectives. 

Malignant malarkey!  You clarified nothing, you
obfuscated your intention to criminalize criticism of Islam. That is
kitman as well as al-Taqiyya.

      • We
        embrace the role that free expression plays in bolstering religious
        tolerance. 

No sentient person, informed of the damnable
doctrines & practices of Islam, will ever tolerate its existence!
Free expression does not bolster tolerance, it bolsters exposure and
awareness! You spoke of a one sided free expression, limited to false
praise of Islam, not extending to honest criticism.

      • We
        have agreed to build a culture of understanding and acceptance
        through 

Anyone who understands Islam will never accept it!

      • concrete
        measures to combat discrimination and violence,  

Only Islam and Muslims advocate violence; we
advocate laws to expel and exclude Islam’s fifth column for the purpose
of preventing violence. Do you allow rattlesnakes to reside in your
house? Excluding rattlesnakes is discriminatory.

      • such
        as education and outreach, and we are working together to achieve those
        objectives.

When a Muslim says “education” he means
indoctrination.  Nothing exposed in the links provided in this
blog post is included in instructional materials used in our
educational system, with the exception of some doctoral programs at
large universities.     Outreach translates to
appeasement.

      • it’s
        one thing if people are just disagreeing. That is fair game. That’s
        free speech. 

They say that “only Allah has the right to be
worshiped” and that I must convert or be killed. I say that I have a
right to worship or not as I blessed well see fit, without being
intimidated or coerced.  They assert a duty to attack us, I assert
a right to effective national defense. They say I must be silent, I say
that I have an absolute right to expose their evil doctrines &
practices.

      • But
        if it results in sectarian clashes,

Sunni & Shi’ia are rivals for power. Power
corrupts. Nothing can stop them form internecine conflict.

      •  if
        it results in the destruction or the defacement or the vandalization of
        religious sites, 

In Africa, Arabia, & Asia, Muslims burn down
churches, with Christians in them.  That results from what is
preached in their local mosques, not what we write in our blogs.
We do not incite vandalism, a few  idiots driven over the edge by
frustration act on their own free will, without anyone telling them to.

      • if
        it even results in imprisonment or death, 

The trial and execution of a Qur’an in Florida did
not result in death. Those deaths and property damage resulted from the
rabid preaching at Jumah Salat, not anything anyone said or did over
here.

      • then
        government must held those – hold those who are responsible accountable.

I’d like to see how you are going to hold Allah
& Moe responsible for riots & murders inspired by the Qur’an
& Sunnah. Allah is an impotent idol and Moe has been dead
since   Do you think you can go to Egypt & Pakistan to
arrest, try and incarcerate the rabid Imams who rouse the rabble to
riot?  I’d like to see you try it.

There is a difference between shouting fire in a
crowded theater where there is no fire or rousing a lynch mob and
burning a Qur’an.  Exposing the damnable doctrines of Islam in a
blog post does not kill anyone or destroy any property.  Property
is destroyed and people are killed by Muslims engaged in an act of
worship: terrorism.  They don’t get their incitement from us, they
get it from Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis &
jurisprudence and from their Imams.

      • But
        I have to say we have one difficulty in understanding all of the
        problems that we see around the world, and that is
      • that
        because religion is so personal and because it is something that we
        highly value in ourselves,

No, it ain’t and anybody smarter than a Moron can
see it after a little investigation. Ignorant & indolent Morons
like you project the western concept of religion onto Islam, which it
does not fit.  We view religion as a beneficent & anodyne
agency of theology & interpersonal relationships.  Religions
are our source of much of our morality & ethics.

Islam is presented and accepted by Muslims as the
absolute rule of Allah, which must be obeyed in all times, at all
places. It governs every facet of human life from conception through
burial.  It dictates how they eat, how they defecate and how they
wipe their butts. It also imposes upon them a demonic mandate to
conquer and subjugate the entire world.  Go to Amazon.com and get
a copy of Reliance of the Traveller or Volume II of hedaya and start
reading. You can learn much from the table of contents.

Islam is not a benign, anodyne & benevolent
theology, it is a continuing criminal enterprise; a war crime against
humanity motivated by filthy lucre: “The Spoils of War“.
After reading the first verse, skip ahead to 41, then 60 & 67.  Turn next to 33:26-27 and  48:15-20.   Turn next to Sahih Muslim 19.4327,  Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220,  & 4.52.267.  If, after checking those
references, you can not correctly answer the following review
questions, its time to consider suicide to protect the gene pool.

  1. To whom do the spoils belong?
  2. Who gets the top 20%?
  3. What was Moe’s motivation?
  4. What is Allah’s motivation?
    [Hint: it ain't getting Moe into his celestial bordello.]
  5. What was the net effect of casting terror?
  6. What did Allah promise Muslims?
  7. What is the legal status of taking spoils?
  8. What did Allah give Moe?
  9. How did Muslims invest the treasures of the Persian &
    Byzantine Empires?

 

      •  it
        strikes us as troubling that people are not confident in their
        religious beliefs

      • to
        the point where they do not fear speech that raises questions about
        religion.         

Muslims are hypersensitive because their faith is
false.  The ruling class is in the know, it is likely that many of
the clerical class are true believers. They do not want the Ummah to
find out.

Christians have a long chain of fulfilled Jewish
prophecies to base their faith on.  Muslims have only Moe’s word.
Islam begins and ends with Moe, who co-opted Jewish Prophets in hopes
of deceiving the local Jews.  The trick did not work; the Jews
laughed him to scorn, recognizing the fraud.

Go to a hadith search engine such as Islamic
Network and search Sahih Bukhari  for these terms, without the
quotes: “was revealed”, “inspiration” and “your wishes and desires”.

      • every
        one of us who is a religious person knows that there are some who may
        not support or approve of our religion.

      • But is our religion so weak that
        statements of disapproval will cause us to lose our faiths?         

Moe was extremely sensitive to criticism, so much so
that he ordered his companions to kill several critics.  One clear
example is in the hadith  where we can easily find it, others
are buried in  The Life of
Muhammad and  Tabari’s
Tahrik.  Answering Islam
has several of the relevant accounts.

      • That
        would be most unfortunate. In fact, what we have found, in study after
        study, is that the United States is one of the most religious countries
        in the world. And yet anybody can believe anything and go anywhere.

      • And
        so there is no contradiction between having strong religious beliefs
        and having the freedom to exercise them and to speak about them and to
        even have good debates with others.

Res. 16/18 puts some emphasis on inter-religious
dialog, assuming that it will deaden our awareness of the existential
conflict between Islam and Christianity. When Pope Benedict XVI
lectured at Regensburg, Muslims raised hell and a large number of the
Ulema wrote a missive entitled A Common Word Between Us and You. in which they
called for dialog to find “common ground”.  The central concept of
the missive is drawn from Surah Al Imran 3:64.
That ayeh ends with this sentence: “Bear witness that we are Muslims”;
those are fighting words.  Read the context through #112.
Those threatening words were used in Moe’s extortion letter to Heraclius.

To see how Moe conducted dialog with Christians
(demanding that they curse themselves) turn to this topic in Tafsir Ibn
Kathir: The Challenge to the Mubahalah.

      • Now,
        the fact is that no matter how
        strongly each of us believes, none of us has the benefit of knowing all
        the truth that God holds in his hands        . 

Nobody knows for certain, but Islam asserts a claim
of certainty that it alone has a monopoly on truth and that our
religion is in error.

      • And
        therefore, we are doing the
        best we can here on
        earth to reflect and to give honor to our creator in a way that is
        manifest in our religious values        . Because truly, at the root of every major religion,
        is a connection with the divinity, 

The root of Islam is war, not a connection with
divinity.  Search the hadith for “inspiration”, you will discover
how Moe got his “revelations”: in epileptic seizures. In the first
instance, he thought that he had wrestled with the devil but his wife
convinced him that he had encountered an angel.  Take another good
long look at 8:67;’
that is some connection with “divinity”.

      • Now
        I know that some in my country
        and elsewhere have criticized this meeting         and our work with
        all of you.
      •  But
        I want to make clear that I am
        proud of this work,         and I am proud to be working with every one
        of you. And I believe that this
        work is an affirmation of America’s values        , but equally
        important an affirmation of
        universal values        . 

Since when is anal osculation either an American or
universal value?  Lifting Satan’s tail & inserting
tongue  solves nothing. Abandoning our precious, hard won right to
speak and write the truth is not an American value.  American
values include life, liberty, property, pursuit of happiness and
defeating our enemies. Yielding liberty to our enemies is the polar
opposite of American values.

      • Because
        we nor – no country
        individually has a monopoly on the truth        , and we will do better
        when we live in peace with each other, 

In 1789 we were willing to live in peace with the
entire world but the Barbary pirates were not willing to live in peace
with us. They attacked our shipping and demanded tribute, which nearly
bankrupted the young nation. When asked by what right they attacked us,
the Algerian Ambassador replied
in terms which parallel the reply of Umar’s field commander to the
Persians in Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386.     Peace
will only be possible after Islam is eliminated because Islam is permanent
war.

      • when
        we live with respect and
        humility, and listen to each other. And it is important that we
        recognize what we accomplished
        when this resolution ended 10 years of divisive debate where people
        were not listening to each other anymore.

It is abundantly clear from the recent statements of
Akram & ishanoglu, as well as the Islamophobia Reports, that
the change is purely rhetorical, a semantic game at which our side
lost.

      • Now
        we are. We’re talking. We have
        to get past the idea that we can suppress religious minorities        , 

This is a terrible place to use the royal we .  It is
Islam, not America that suppresses indigenous religious
minorities.  There is an external ‘religious’ minority which has
infiltrated a fifth column into America with moles in high places in
defense, intelligence and security agencies.  We need to expel and
exclude them. You condemn the only recourse we have a priori.

      • that
        we can restrict
        speech,

When you create a legal construct which ties what we
utter and publish with the completely unrelated actions of unrelated
people on other continents, completely beyond our control, assigning
blame to us for what they do on their own accord, then you are
attempting to restrict free speech by forcing self-censorship.
You are, in effect, erecting a heckler’s veto and abandoning the First
Amendment.

      • that
        we are smart enough
        that we can substitute our judgment for God’s and determine who is or
        is not blaspheming.         

Open Reliance of the Traveller to O8.0 and start reading, continuing through O8.7;
get a clue!

      • And
        by bringing countries from around the world here,
      • we
        are affirming our common
        humanity

      • and our common commitment to defend
        and promote fundamental rights.

I doubt that any falser words were ever uttered in
the history of mankind. We are committed to defend and promote
fundamental rights, Muslims are not; Muslims are committed to the
abrogation of our rights.  Islam denies the sanctity of our blood
and property, declaring that we have no rights until we become Muslims.
Those denials are contained in Moe’s declaration  quoted in Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387. Projecting our own values
onto the enemy is a suicidal blunder.

      • We
        can think others are wrong, but we don’t feel so insecure and so
        fearful of their wrong views that we try to suppress them, imprison
        them, or even kill them.

Ten years ago, 19 Muslims hijacked four passenger
aircraft and flew three of them into occupied office structures.
They shouted “Allahu akbar!” while slitting the throats of the flight
crews. Subsequently, other Muslims, acting in the name of Allah, bombed
subways in Madrid and London and seized a school in Beslan.  Get a
clue!  In the last 1400 years, 270*106  innocent people lost their
lives to Islam.  If we do not eradicate Islam, either ideologically or militarily, they will out breed
&  out last us and civilization will be destroyed.

December 16, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islamic Terrorism, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Obamination: Treason in Mumbai


Thanks and a tip of the hat to Logan’s Warning for alerting me to Barack Hussein Obama’s al-Taqiyya. Indian Express carries the story of Obamination at Xavier’s College, where a Muslim student asked for his views on jihad.

“I think all of us recognise that this great religion (Islam) in the hands of a few extremists has been distorted to justify violence towards innocent people that is never justified,”

Lets break it down point by point.

great religion

extremists

  • Muhammad bin Abdullah, founder of Islam
    • 8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
    • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
    • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
      Narrated Anas bin Malik:
      Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”
    • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
      Narrated Abu Huraira:

      Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

Moe defined Islam with his recitation and set the standard with his Sunnah. Normative Islam is extreme; there is no extremism over and above it.

distorted

The standard of Islam is open on the face of the Qur’an & hadith. What is distorted about it?  “Ordered to fight” & “made victorious with terror” are the standard, not distortions.

justify violence

What did Allah say about “fighting” ?  What did Moe say about it?  “Fight them until”, “ordered to fight”.  How do you justify offensive wars of conquest?  In Mecca, outnumbered, in a position of weakness, Moe preached tolerance & forbearance. In Medina, as he accrued an army, he preached defensive & retaliatory warfare.

  • 22:39. Permission to fight is given to those (i.e. believers against disbelievers), who are fighting them, (and) because they (believers) have been wronged, and surely, Allâh is Able to give them (believers) victory
  • 2:190. And fight in the Way of Allâh those who fight you, but transgress not the limits. Truly, Allâh likes not the transgressors. [This Verse is the first one that was revealed in connection with Jihâd, but it was supplemented by another (V.9:36)].

Click the link to 2:190, read the translator’s footnote and the surrounding context. While the verse relates directly to defensive warfare, the definition of jihad in the footnote is anything but defensive.

Al-Anfal 39 & At-Taubah 29, quoted above, command offensive, not defensive warfare. When they were revealed, Moe’s army had grown in numbers and skill, he was ready for the conquest of Mecca and neighboring kingdoms & empires.  Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir describes these as orders “to fight”.

  • The Order to fight to eradicate Shirk and Kufr
  • The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah
    • This honorable Ayah was revealed with the order to fight the People of the Book, after the pagans were defeated, the people entered Allah’s religion in large numbers, and the Arabian Peninsula was secured under the Muslims’ control. Allah commanded His Messenger to fight the People of the Scriptures, Jews and Christians, on the ninth year of Hijrah, and he prepared his army to fight the Romans and called the people to Jihad announcing his intent and destination. The Messenger sent his intent to various Arab areas around Al-Madinah to gather forces, and he collected an army of thirty thousand.

Those abominable imperatives are codified in Shari’ah: Reliance of the Traveller, Book o, Chapter 9, Sections 8 & 9.

  • o9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

    The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

    “Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29),

    the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be peace).  After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad. As for the Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

    “I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,”

    this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).

    o9.9

    The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n: though according to the Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers, are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sole exceptions to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs, neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh Bidaya al-mubtadi’ (y21), 6.48-49) ).

Reliance of the Traveller o9.1 defines the religious obligation of offensive conquest.  The closing paragraphs of the section convey vital information.

  • In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.

    The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year.

    The second state is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim country or near to one, in which case jihad is personally obligatory (def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants of that country, who must repel the non-Muslims with whatever they can).

What does this mean: “meaning upon the Muslims each year”?   Muslims are required to mount at least one military expedition against kuffar in every year. The question is answered with extreme clarity by this quote from Al-Shafi’i.

“The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims’ interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse.”

innocent people

In Islam’s view, only Muslims are innocent. All others are rebels against Allah who must be warred against.  Scroll up to the quote of Bukhari 1.8.387 and read it again. Our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims until we become Muslims. We only obtain rights by becoming Muslims.  That should be a clue for you.

Muslims love to quote Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:32, which says that killing one innocent person is equivalent to killing the entire population of the world, but never quote the succeeding verse. That is because 5:33 prescribes hudud for those who “wage war” against Allah. It says that they can be crucified, killed, mutilated or expelled.  But it does not define “wage war”. Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir fills in that gap for us. If you do not believe in Allah; if you are not a Muslim, then you are waging war against him, subject to the punishments listed in 5:33.

The Punishment of those Who Cause Mischief in the Land
`Wage war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways.

President Barack Hussein Obama is an accursed liar, a traitor to the human race as well as the nation over which he has been elected to preside.  He lies about the nature and identity of our sworn existential enemy and demands that we tolerate its existence & perpetual aggression.

It is not possible for a sane and sentient person, a lover of life & liberty, apprised of the damnable doctrines & practices of Islam, to tolerate the perpetuation & propagation of a belief in divine mandate to conquer, subjugate, enslave, dispossess and kill everyone who does not immediately submit to Islam.

Islam must be confronted and resisted, both ideologically & militarily. President Barack Hussein Obama won’t do it. He must be removed from office  and replaced by someone who will. 

November 7, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Terrorism, Political Correctness | , , , , , | Leave a Comment

Qur’an: Read it before Burning it


General Petraeus is quoted by the Associated Press (on Yahoo! news) as saying that Qur’an burning would inflame passions.

“Images of the burning of a Quran would undoubtedly be used by extremists in Afghanistan — and around the world — to inflame public opinion and incite violence,”
The Secretary General of Nato is quoted in a similar vein.

“would be in a strong contradiction with the all the values we stand for and fight for.”
Did Christians riot, destroy property and kill people when a photograph was published as “art” showing a crucifix immersed in urine?  Did they riot when elephant dung was used in ersatz  iconography?  But Muslims, whipped to a frenzy by rabid clerics in Juma Salat  riot on the basis of unfounded rumors as well as such egregious offenses as the Motoons & Fitna.

If rabid Muslims are going to harm our troops because a few Qur’ans are burned,  they will also use  blog posts, books, videos and articles exposing the intrinsic evil of Islam as a pretexts for outrageous acts of violence.  If we follow the General’s illogic, we must forbid all criticism of Islam, effectively annulling the First Amendment.

CNN quotes General Petraeus as saying that the Qur’an burning could “endanger” our troops and the mission.  CNN quotes a statement from our Embassy in Kabul in which the Embassy condemns the Qur’an burning. in terms such as “acts of disrespect against the religion of Islam”, “deliberate attempts to offend members of religious or ethnic groups”  and “offensive messages, which are contrary to U.S. government policy “.

Msnbc reports on the remarks of Attorney General Eric Holder and other critics.  They quote Holder as calling the burning “idiotic and dangerous” . They quote a group of religious leaders as referring to “anti-Muslim frenzy”  and  ”disrespect for a sacred text”.

“To attack any religion in the United States is to do violence to the religious freedom of all Americans,”
State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley is quoted  in a fulminating denunciation

“We think that these are provocative acts, they are disrespectful, they are intolerant, they are divisive,”
Crowley called the burning “inconsistent with our American values” and “un-American”.

Our servicemen are in harm’s way in Afghanistan, viewed by the locals as “occupiers” to be tormented, killed and driven away. When  Dar ul-Islam is invaded, jihad to repel the invaders is fard ayn, an individually binding religious obligation upon all able bodied male Muslims. I direct the attention of doubters and dissenters to Reliance of the Traveller, Book o9.1. They do not need any additional provocation.

Dove World calls Islam Satanic.  It intends to protest Islam’s attacks on us by burning Qur’ans. Is that  an attack on a religion?  Is Islam a religion?  Muslims do use that word, but the principal term used to describe Islam is Deen: way of life.  What is that way of life?  What is its economic base, is it agriculture? Is it construction? Is it manufacturing? Is it trade and commerce?  One saying  attributed to Muhammad answers these questions for us. Read it carefully; I added emphasis to  make critical points clear to you.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

Muhammad told the Muslims that if they engage in trade & agriculture to the exclusion of jihad Allah will curse them until they return to “your original religion”. What did they give up? What must they return to? Jihad.  What is jihad?  Is jihad an-nafs, the struggle against ego and temptation an alternative to agriculture? How  would it produce food or income with which to purchase food?   What is jihad, and how does it rival  agriculture as an economic activity?

Fortunately for us, Islamic law includes a clear and unambiguous definition of jihad. For clarity and ease of exploration, I have added emphasis and links to external references.

o9.0: Jihad

(O: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad.

“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad.”

The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:

-1- “Fighting is prescribed for you” (Koran 2:216);

-2- “Slay them wherever you find them” (Koran 4:89);

-3- “Fight the idolators utterly” (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

“I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah”;

and the hadith reported by Muslim,

“To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it.”Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.)
Jihad means “to war on non-Muslims”.  How does it produce income?  The Qur’an has the answer to this question, distributed over several surahs. [Emphasis added for clarity.]

8:1. They ask you (O Muhammad) about the spoils of war. Say: “The spoils are for Allâh and the Messenger.” So fear Allâh and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad), if you are believers.

8:41. And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allâh, and to the Messenger, and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad)], (and also) the orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have believed in Allâh and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the two forces met (the battle of Badr) – And Allâh is Able to do all things.
Al-Anfal is variously translated as “The Spoils”, “War Booty” or “The Windfalls”. If Islam is a “religion of peace”, why does its scripture tell us that Moe gets the loot, specifically the top 20%. That top 20% is called Khums.  In Bukhari’s collection of authentic hadith, the Book of Khumus describes the division of the spoils.    Of course, that must be a rare and occasional  necessity, because Islam is a “religion of peace”.  So why does that book contain 88 ahadith?

In Surah Al Fath, we learn that Allah has promised the Muslims “rich spoils” that they will capture.

48:19. And abundant spoils that they will capture. And Allâh is Ever All-Mighty, All-Wise.

48:20. Allâh has promised you abundant spoils that you will capture, and He has hastened for you this, and He has restrained the hands of men from you, that it may be a sign for the believers, and that He may guide you to a Straight Path.

48:21. And other (victories and much booty there are, He promises you) which are not yet within your power, indeed Allâh compasses them, And Allâh is Ever Able to do all things.
Did Allah deliver on his promise of “abundant spoils”?

33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.

33:27. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.
In another ayeh, Allah reveals Moe’s motivation: “the good of this world”.  What does that mean?

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
The translators included a parenthetical expression taken from tafsir. That expression tells us what Moe wanted: ransom money.  The mission of Islam is mercenary, neither beneficent, spiritual nor anodyne.  ”Religion of peace”?  Waging war, making a great slaughter is one of the duties of a Prophet.  Got a clue yet?

The hadit have more clues for the clueless.

Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4327:
The spoils of war were not made lawful for any people before us, This is because Allah saw our weakness and humility and made them lawful for us.
Taking spoils was taboo among the Arabs. Allah gave Moe special dispensation because he saw Moe’s weakness and humility.  Lets take a good, close look at that humility. Khan bowdlerized this hadith when he translated Bukhari. Aisha Bewley did not.

Bukhari  Ch 61 # 2756: …It is mentioned from Ibn ‘Umar from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, “My provision has been placed under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and humility have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.
How did Moe get his provision? What happened to anyone who disobeyed his command?  So Allah saw his weakness and humility….. Humility?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
Narrated Abu Huraira:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).
How was Moe made victorious?  Who brought him the keys to the treasures of the world?  What of those treasures?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 267:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Prophet said, “Khosrau will be ruined, and there will be no Khosrau after him, and Caesar will surely be ruined and there will be no Caesar after him, and you will spend their treasures in Allah’s Cause.” He called, “War is deceit’.
How about those treasures, did they inure to Moe’s benefit?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 37, Number 495:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

Whenever a dead man in debt was brought to Allah’s Apostle he would ask, “Has he left anything to repay his debt?” If he was informed that he had left something to repay his debts, he would offer his funeral prayer, otherwise he would tell the Muslims to offer their friend’s funeral prayer. When Allah made the Prophet wealthy through conquests, he said, “I am more rightful than other believers to be the guardian of the believers, so if a Muslim dies while in debt, I am responsible for the repayment of his debt, and whoever leaves wealth (after his death) it will belong to his heirs. “

How did Allah make Moe wealthy?

I have presented proof of the centrality of Jihad in Islam, that it is a predatory way of life, predation upon the non-Islamic human race, Dar ul-Harb, the land of war.  Why is it the land of war?  Because it is not yet under Islam’s domination.

The entire world must be brought under Islamic domination because Allah’s word must be made superior.

9:33. It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh) hate (it).

48:28. He it is Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), that He may make it (Islâm) superior over all religions. And All-Sufficient is Allâh as a Witness.

61:9. He it is Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâmic Monotheism) to make it victorious over all (other) religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, and disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh and in His Messenger Muhammed ) hate (it).
Two ayat declare that Islam must be made superior, one declares that it must be made victorious.  How would that happen?  The  context has a clue for you.

61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn ­ Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.
“Strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh”; whatever could that mean?  How would that make Islam victorious & dominant?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 65:

Narrated Abu Musa: A man came to the Prophet and asked, “A man fights for war booty; another fights for fame and a third fights for showing off; which of them fights in Allah’s Cause?” The Prophet said, “He who fights that Allah’s Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights in Allah’s Cause.”

13:41. See they not that We gradually reduce the land (of disbelievers, by giving it to the believers, in war victories) from its outlying borders. And Allâh judges, there is none to put back His Judgement and He is Swift at reckoning.

Muslims fight in Allah’s cause, to make Islam dominant. Allah gives them the  disbeliever’s land in war victories.  Got a clue yet?

Two ayat in Surah Al-Anfal tell us most of what we need to know about Islam.

8:38. Say to those who have disbelieved, if they cease (from disbelief) their past will be forgiven. But if they return (thereto), then the examples of those (punished) before them have already preceded (as a warning).

8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
Who: disbelievers.  What? Fight them until resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped in the whole world.  Got a clue yet?  Surah At-Taubah has another clue for  the clueless.

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

But Islam is a “great religion of peace”.   Surely those conquest imperatives must be  metaphorical, allegorical or anachronistic. Yeah, right. I already showed you one of the confirming ahadith, in that quote from Reliance. “commanded to fight the people until”… . That same section told you that jihad is warfare against disbelievers.  But you did not get a clue.  Shari’ah has another clue for you.  Those conquest imperatives are codified into Islamic law and one of them specifies its scriptural basis.

o9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

“Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29),

the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be peace).  After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad. As for the Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

“I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,”

this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).
The caliph makes war on  ”people of the scripture”  until they are subjugated and  make annual extortion payments.  The scriptural basis is At-Taubah 29.
Allah said “fight them” ; Moe said ” I am commanded to fight” .  What did Moe do?  What did his rightly guided caliphs do?  How did Islam build an empire that stretched from the border of China to the border of France?

When America won its war of revolution, it no longer had the protection of the British fleet. Her shipping was sacked by the Barbary Pirates. The young nation was nearly bankrupted by paying tribute.  Adams & Jefferson asked by what right they attacked us.  The answer has another clue for you.

The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven. [Wikepedia]
Examine the crucial elements.

  • Laws of the Prophet
  • written in their Koran
  • who should not have answered their authority were sinners,
  • right and duty to make war upon them
  • make slaves of all they could take as prisoners
  • every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven

Can you connect the dots?  If not, you are a certified LibTard, like Holder, Clinton & Obama.  The ambassador’s obnoxious statement is strikingly similar to a statement made  to a Persian general on a battlefield. This quote comes from Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”
Examine the crucial elements.

  • ordered us to fight you
    • until you worship Allah alone
      • or give jizya
  • martyrs go to Paradise
  • survivors enslave you

Are you intelligent enough to connect the dots or are you a LibTard, impervious to all evidence?  Why do Muslims attack us; are they grievance driven or doctrine driven?  Is Islam a “religion of peace” ? Has it been “perverted”,  ”twisted” or “hijacked”?

Is the Qur’an a holy book, the sacred word of Allah or was it contrived by a venal con man, woven of plagiarized pseudepigrapha  and situational scripture?   You won’t find the answer from the Qur’an alone, you need  hadith to complete the puzzle. Moe, like modern cult leaders, had groupies. Moe wanted to accept their sexual advances. Allah accommodated his wishes.

33:50. O Prophet (Muhammad )! Verily, We have made lawful to you your wives, to whom you have paid their Mahr (bridal money given by the husband to his wife at the time of marriage), and those (captives or slaves) whom your right hand possesses – whom Allâh has given to you, and the daughters of your ‘Amm (paternal uncles) and the daughters of your ‘Ammah (paternal aunts) and the daughters of your Khâl (maternal uncles) and the daughters of your Khâlah (maternal aunts) who migrated (from Makkah) with you, and a believing woman if she offers herself to the Prophet, and the Prophet wishes to marry her; a privilege for you only, not for the (rest of) the believers. Indeed We know what We have enjoined upon them about their wives and those (captives or slaves) whom their right hands possess, – in order that there should be no difficulty on you. And Allâh is Ever Oft­Forgiving, Most Merciful.
Moe lusted after Zainab, whose father rejected him.  Moe fixed up his adopted son with her, later taking advantage of a convenient divorce to snatch her.

33:37. And (remember) when you said to him (Zaid bin Hârithah; the freed­slave of the Prophet ) on whom Allâh has bestowed Grace (by guiding him to Islâm) and you (O Muhammad  too) have done favour (by manumitting him) “Keep your wife to yourself, and fear Allâh.” But you did hide in yourself (i.e. what Allâh has already made known to you that He will give her to you in marriage) that which Allâh will make manifest, you did fear the people (i.e., Muhammad  married the divorced wife of his manumitted slave) whereas Allâh had a better right that you should fear Him. So when Zaid had accomplished his desire from her (i.e. divorced her), We gave her to you in marriage, so that (in future) there may be no difficulty to the believers in respect of (the marriage of) the wives of their adopted sons when the latter have no desire to keep them (i.e. they have divorced them). And Allâh’s Command must be fulfilled.

33:38. There is no blame on the Prophet () in that which Allâh has made legal for him.That has been Allâh’s Way with those who have passed away of (the Prophets of) old. And the Command of Allâh is a decree determined.

Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3330:

Anas (Allah be pleased with him) reported: When the ‘Iddah of Zainab was over, Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said to Zaid to make a mention to her about him. Zaid went on until he came to her and she was fermenting her flour. He (Zaid) said: As I saw her I felt in my heart an idea of her greatness so much so that I could not see towards her (simply for the fact) that Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) had made a mention of her. So I turned my back towards her. and I turned upon my heels, and said: Zainab, Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) has sent (me) with a message to you. She said: I do not do anything until I solicit the will of my Lord. So she stood at her place of worship and the (verse of) the Qur’an (pertaining to her marriage) were revealed, and Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) came to her without permission. He (the narrator) said: I saw that Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) served us bread and meat until it was broad day light and the people went away, but some persons who were busy in con- versation stayed on in the house after the meal. Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) also went out and I also followed him, and he began to visit the apartments of his wives greeting them (with the words): As-Salamu ‘alaikum, and they would say: Allah’s Messenger, how did you find your family (hadrat Zainab)? He (the narrator) stated: I do not know whether I had informed him that the people had gone out or he (the Holy Prophet) informed me (about that). He moved on until he entered the apartment, and I also went and wanted to enter (the apartment) along with him, but he threw a curtain between me and him, as (the verfes pertaining to seclusion) had been revealed, and people were instructed in what they had been instructed. Ibn Rafii had made this addition in his narration:” O you who believe, enter not the houses of the Prophet unless permission is given to you for a meal, not waiting for its cooking being finished…” to the words”… Allah forbears not from the truth.”

Moe’s favorite, his child bride was onto him. This hadith lets the cat out of the bag

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 311:

Narrated Aisha:

I used to look down upon those ladies who had given themselves to Allah’s Apostle and I used to say, “Can a lady give herself (to a man)?” But when Allah revealed: “You (O Muhammad) can postpone (the turn of) whom you will of them (your wives), and you may receive any of them whom you will; and there is no blame on you if you invite one whose turn you have set aside (temporarily).’ (33.51) I said (to the Prophet), “I feel that your Lord hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires.”

Now we know: the Qur’an ain’t sacred, it is situational scripture, a fraud.  Allah is no god, it is Moe’s dummy.

If burning the Qur’an is an attack on Islam, it is a counter attack, subsequent to Islamic attacks upon us.  Did you know that Islam denies the divinity, crucifixion, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ?  Did you know that Islam curses Jews & Christians, that it calls us the worst of living creatures?  Did you know that Allah turned some Jews into apes and swine?  Why not?  Because you have not read  the Qur’an.

I admit that the International Burn a Quran Day may irritate Muslims. But it serves a larger purpose: it gives me and others a good excuse to  expose the fatal facts of Islam to a curious public.  The constant drumbeat of news coverage is raising interest and curiosity.  A few more people will read this blog post. A few more will click the links and explore Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition and jurisprudence than otherwise would.  And I view that as a good thing.

So read the Qur’an  already. Then piss on it, let it dry and  burn it.

September 8, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Radicalism?, Political Correctness | , , , , , | Leave a Comment

Esposito’s Question & My Answer


On August 27, John Esposito uttered and the On Faith Panel of  News Week & The Washington Post published  Is Islam a primary driver or cause of terrorism? which attracted my attention while I read an article by Jordan Sekulow:  Imam Rauf should apologize. While I generally agree with Sekulow, I admit that an apology from the Imam would not alter my attitude, even if I thought it to be sincere.  Nor would I be satisfied by relocation of the Park 51 project.

I skimmed Esposito’s article and discovered a spew of al-Taqiyya which deserves refutation. As is my habit, I will quote the most egregious passages and let those who want to read the  entire article use the link above.

“Islam, like all world religions, neither supports nor requires illegitimate violence.” [Emphasis added.]

illegitimate violence

Allah, through his conquest imperatives, legitimatizes  aggression.  Is it legitimate  to wage war because your intended victim does not share your beliefs & ritual practices?  Surah Al-Anfal 38 identifies “those who have disbelieved”  as the target of violence commanded in the next verse :  8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone… . The explicit casus belli is disbelief.  Allah & his slaves think that is legitimate, do you?

In Surah At-Taubah, Allah commands Muslims to fight  Jews & Christians until they are subjugated and make annual extortion payments called jizya.

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.  Is disbelief a legitimate casus belli?  You be the judge.  In my opinion, John Esposito practiced kitman to convey a false impression. 

“The Quran does not advocate or condone terrorism.”

Quran does not advocate  terrorism

That is not what Allah said. In Surah  Al-Imran 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).  What did Allah say he would do? That could be a reference to the afterlife, is it? Here is the answer from Tafsir Al-Jalalayn. “We will cast terror (read ru‘b or ru‘ub) into the hearts of the disbelievers: after departing from Uhud they resolved to return in order to exterminate the Muslims, but they were terrified and did not return;…”

 Islam does not get off so easily, the reference is temporal, not eterna. In Surah Al Anfal, Allah again says that he will cast terror.  8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.”

Yeah, right, Allah issued the command to the angels; so why was he reminding  his companions of  the command?  Obviously it was something he wanted them to do.  Examine verse 57 carefully. 8:57. So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.  The meaning reaches full clarity in the light of  Surah Al-Hashr 2.

59:2. He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allâh! But Allâh’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).

Allah terrorized the Bani An-Nadir so that they destroyed their own settlement, so you should take admonition.  Learn a lesson : take admonition. Get it?  By what agency did Allah cast terror?  Verse 13 has a clue for you.  59:13. Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh. That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of Allâh).

The Jews were  more afraid of Moe’s army than of Allah.  Ain’t that the general idea?  Examine Abdullah Yusuf Ali’s translation of 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly. [Emphasis added.]

Maximize your army to strike terror.  Got that clue yet?

“As with other faiths, a radical fringe distorts and misinterprets mainstream and normative Islamic doctrines and laws.”

distorts and misinterprets

What did Allah command Muslims to do?  What did Moe and his “rightly guided caliphs” do?  Just how did Islam expand to rule  all of Arabia, northern Africa,  southern Europe and nearly half of Asia?  Sahih Bukhari’s books of  Jihad, Khumus & Expedition have some clues for you.  Sure, there is an injunction against suicide.  There is a difference between wasting your death and killing Jews or pagans.  Get a clue.  The phrase “fought until he was killed”  occurs in several ahadith. Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2567, Sahih Muslim 19.4413, 20.4678,4679,4681,4683.

“They pay no attention to Islamic law which draws on the Quran to set out clear guidelines for the conduct of war and provides no support for hijacking and hostage taking.”

no support for  hostage taking

A search of Hilali & Khan’s Noble Qur’an turned up ten matching Surahs for “ransom”.  Most of them are not relevant, but one is particularly relevant.
8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter.

The parenthetical expressions come from tafsirs used in the translation.  Allah reprimanded Moe for not killing enough of the enemy because he wanted ransom money.   Tafsir Al-Jalalayn makes matters abundantly clear.  ”The following was revealed when they ransomed those taken captive at Badr: It is not for any Prophet to have (read as an takūna lahu or an yakūna lahu) prisoners until he has made slaughter in the land, going all the way in fighting disbelievers. You, O believers, desire the transient things of this world, its ephemeral gains, by ransoming, while God desires, for you, the Hereafter, that is, its reward, through your killing them; and God is Mighty, Wise: this was abrogated by His words [and set them free] afterward either with grace or by ransom [Q. 47:4].”

Surah Muhammad 4, as mentioned in the tafsir, reinforces the concept beyond all doubt.  47:4. So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom), or ransom (according to what benefits Islâm), until the war lays down its burden. Thus [you are ordered by Allâh to continue in carrying out Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm (i.e. are saved from the punishment in the Hell-fire) or at least come under your protection], but if it had been Allâh’s Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allâh, He will never let their deeds be lost,

Moe was given permission to release captives for ransom after he had killed a sufficient number.

“Islam’s relationship to violence and terrorism, as well as the primary causes of global terrorism, are often concealed and confused by the religious language and symbolism that extremists use.”

Islam’s relationship to violence and terrorism

What is that relationship, if not that which is revealed in the Qur’an & hadith?  What texts do the “extremists” quote?

causes of global terrorism

Islamic doctrine. Not poverty, not repression, not occupation, not ignorance, not illiteracy; Islamic doctrine. What did Allah command them to do?  What did Moe do?  The objective is accumulating   ”good deeds”  to weigh against their sins on judgment day. If one does not die in battle, his sins are weighed against his “good deeds”.   Allah has a clue for you in Surah At-Taubah 120, I will emphasize the crucial clause for clarity.  9:120. It was not becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins of the neighbourhood to remain behind Allâh’s Messenger (Muhammad  when fighting in Allâh’s Cause) and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer their own lives to his life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness. Surely, Allâh wastes not the reward of the Muhsinûn

Muslims earn Brownie points by angering or injuring disbelievers.  That is the cause of terrorism.

“Religiously legitimated violence adds divine, authority that increases a terrorist leader’s authority as well as moral justification, obligation, certitude, and heavenly reward, all of which enhance recruitment and a willingness to fight and die in a “sacred struggle.” “

Religiously legitimated violence

The most effective lies have a little sliver of truth mixed in to disguise them. That last quote is exemplary.  I already detailed the religious legitimation.  The obligation is fard al-kifaya, outlined in Reliance of the Traveller, o9.1.  The minimum requirement is one attack per year. The word reward occurs in 60 surahs.  Surah As-Saff 12 mentions the reward for participation in jihad. 61.12 (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn ­ Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success. To see their reward, begin reading at 56:10.

August 29, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Political Correctness | , , , , | Leave a Comment

Good Muslims Know


An email from a Gold Star Mother. I have added a hyperlink to Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir so that you can verify the quoted text.

Ben, real quick here: the reason why I state what good Muslims know, and that is, the Sira is an indispensable part of Islam, because it is a major part of what comprises the sunnah, is also seen throughout ibn Kathir’s tafsir.

Consider the value and respect rendered to ibn Kathir. Then, take note, how often he works off of the report of none other than “Muhammad, son of Ishaq son of Yasar.”

Ibn Ishaq was “born in Medina, about A.H 85. . . . His grandfather Yasar fell into the hands of Khalid b al-Walid.” He was amongst the prisoners Kalid sent to Abu Bakr in Medinah. There, his son, Ishaq, ibn Ishaq’s dad, was born about the year 50.

Hence, the respect for ibn Ishaq as a reliable transmitter. And Tabari works off of ibn Ishaq’s work.

The difference between knowing the prophet and his companions and knowing of them is in knowing of what is in the pages of the sira and digesting that or not knowing of them. Once you get into them, you will only state the same.

dl

Threatening the Jews With Defeat and Encouraging Them to Learn a Lesson From the Battle of Badr

Muhammad bin Ishaq bin Yasar recorded that `Asim bin `Umar bin Qatadah said that when the Messenger of Allah gained victory in the battle of Badr and went back to Al-Madinah, he gathered the Jews in the marketplace of Bani Qaynuqa`.

Therefore, Allah said,

﴿قَدْ كَانَ لَكُمْ ءَايَةٌ﴾

(There has already been a sign for you) meaning, O Jews, who said what you said! You have an Ayah, meaning proof, that Allah will make His religion prevail, award victory to His Messenger, make His Word apparent and His religion the highest.

﴿فِي فِئَتَيْنِ﴾

Allah will make his religion prevail, award victory & make Islam superior. That ayeh is 3:13 . It lays bare Islam’s supremacism & triumphalism. Go now, and read that Tafsir. See what Allah said to the Jews; see what Muhammad did to them!

September 6, 2007 Posted by | ayat, GWOT, Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Radicalism?, Islamic Terrorism, Jihad, Qur'an, Religion of Peace | Leave a Comment

« Previous Entries    

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 33 other followers

%d bloggers like this: