terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion
year the General Assembly of the United Nations resolves to shield
Islam from criticism under the guise of “Combating intolerance,
negative stereotyping, stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to
violence and violence against persons, based on religion or belief”3
The ’13 edition is labeled: A/C.3/68/L.48.
Six paragraphs into the draft resolution, near the top of its second
page, we discover the corrupt core of the resolution, contained in one
sentence. that sentence is quoted below with the crucial clause
highlighted for clarity.
and should not be associated with any religion, nationality,
civilization or ethnic group,
Is terrorism associated with any religion?
The operative expression is “Islamic terrorism“;
why is that so? What did the perpetrators of the
- Maillot massacre
- Madrid rail bombing
- London Subway bombing
- Mumbai massacre
- Beslan massacre
- Fort Hood massacre
- Boston Marathon bombing
all have in common? They pronounced the Takbir when they
attacked; the same words pronounced when Muslims sacrifice hadi for Eid
festivals: “Allahu Akbar”. They are Muslims.
Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and four co-conspirators
signed a bragadocious confession in which they cited
relevant Qur’an verses and classified their abomination as an act
that you are putting us on trial for; to us, they are not
us they are badges of honor, which we carry with pride. Many thanks to
God, for his
gesture, and choosing us to perform the act of Jihad for his cause
and to defend Islam and Muslims.
Therefore, killing you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you,
responding back to your
attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate
duty in our religion. These
actions are our offerings to
In addition, it is the imposed reality on Muslims in Palestine,
Lebanon, Afghanistan, Iraq, in the
land of the two holy sites [Mecca and Medina, Saudi Arabia], and in the
rest of the world, where
Muslims are suffering from your brutality, terrorism, killing ofthe
innocent, and occupying their lands
and their holy sites. Nevertheless, it
would have been the greatest religious duty to fight you over your
Read that again, concentrating on the highlighted
clauses. Mohammed Atta confirmed the obvious in his final
message to the terrorists who hijacked the aircraft.
[traditional war chapters from the Qur'an] and reflect on their
meanings and remember
all of the things God has promised for the martyrs.[...]
[...]5) Pray during the night and be persistent in
asking God to give you victory, control and conquest, and that
He may make your task easier and not expose us.[...]
[...]When the confrontation begins, strike like champions who do not
want to go back to this world. Shout,
‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in the hearts of the
God said: ‘Strike above the neck, and strike at all of their
extremities.’ Know that the gardens of paradise are waiting for you in
all their beauty, and the women of paradise are waiting, calling out,
‘Come hither, friend of God.’ They have dressed in their most beautiful
Did Khalid Sheikh Mohammid, Mohammed Atta &
associates misunderstand, twist, distort or pervert Allah’s word,
Muhammad’s Sunnah and Shari’ah or were they acting in obedience to
Allah; emulating Muhammad?
I will cast terror
Who said that? Allah said that, in Surah
Al-Imran 3.151, Allah said: “We shall cast
terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve”. In Surah
Al-Anfal 8.12, Allah said: “I will cast terror into the hearts of
those who have disbelieved”. What did Allah do?
Allah cast terror
Al-Ahzab 33.26, Allah said: “Allâh brought them down from
their forts and
cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you
killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.” In Surah
Al-Hashr 59.2, Allah said: “and He cast terror
into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings
with their own hands and the hands of the believers. “.
But they really fear
The real terror is Moe and his army, as revealed by
Allah in Surah
Al-Hashr 59.13: “Verily, you
(believers in the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful
as a fear in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh.”.
Made Victorious with Terror
Two ahadith in Sahih Bukhari are explicit concerning
how Moe was made victorious. 1.7.331: “Allah made me victorious by awe, (by
my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey. “ 4.52.220: “I have
victorious with terror “.
- Mutilate bodies to terrify future victims: 8.12
- Fight them until only Allah
is worshiped and resistance ends. 8.39
- Treat defeated victims harshly to strike terror
into those to be attacked next. 8.57
- Maximize military power to terrify
intended victims 8.60
- Make a great
- Kill them wherever you find them 9.5
- Fight people of the book until they are
subjugated and pay extortion 9.29
- Go to war or go to Hell 9.38,
- Believers are only those who fight in Allah’s
cause, killing and being killed in return to the celestial
- Believers are rewarded with an upgrade in the celestial bordello
step taken to injure or enrage infidels 9.120
- Fight the disbelievers nearest you and be harsh against them 9.123
How did Allah cast terror?
- By genocide: 33.26-27, Sunan Abu Dawud 38.4390.
- By murder:
- By devastation of date palm groves.
Connect the dots
- I will cast terror
- I cast terror
- to strike terror
- to terrify
- I was made victorious with terror
- Every Jew in Medina was in fear for his life.
- An entire Arab tribe converted out of fear when Bint Marwan was
- Muslims terrorized Jews by destroying their livlihood.
Terrorism: intrinsic sacrament of Islam
Any rational and intelligent person will come to the
obvious conclusion upon examining the evidence and observing the
pattern. There is no alternative. But the United Nations
Ambassadors of Australia, Azerbaijan and Egypt (and the OIC member
states) would have the United Nations declare that:
cannot and should not be associated with any religion“
. Those making the declaration and those who will vote to pass
the resolution in the General Assembly are traitors to the human race.
The resolution and its supporters are part of the problem, not part of
If we can not associate terrorism with its source:
Islamic doctrine & practice, then we can do nothing to eliminate
it. Terrorism can only be eliminated by eliminating its source: Islam.
The three international human rights covenants which require legal
proscription of Islam for promoting war, genocide and suppression of
human rights must be enforced. The present resolution was
crafted to shield Islam from exposure, justice and eradication.
Citizens of the United States can transmit to their
Representative & Senators a link to the
evidence of human rights violations.
by signing the International Qur’an Petition. Europeans should copy the
petition and email it to their Member of Parliament and MEP.
Tony Blair: Full Of Hot Air
OIC’s Islamophobia Report for June ’13 includes, on page 15, an article
quoting Tony Blair. Lets pick it apart; I will highlight the worst
brain farts in the text and extract them for
PROVES ‘there is a problem
within Islam’ – Tony Blair on 1st of June
made his most powerful political intervention since leaving Downing
Street by launching an outspoken attack on ‘the problem within Islam’.
The former Prime Minister addressed the shocking killing of Drummer Lee
Rigby in Woolwich by going further than he – or any front-rank British
politician – had gone before over the issue of Muslim radicalism.
Writing in Mail on Sunday (1st June), he departed from the usual
argument of Islam as a peaceful religion that should not be tainted by
the actions of a few extremists.
Instead, Mr Blair urged governments to ‘be honest’ and admit that the
problem was more widespread. he wrote: “There is a problem within Islam
– from the adherents of an ideology
which is a strain within Islam…We
have to put it on the table and be honest about it. Of course there are
Christian extremists and Jewish, Buddhist and Hindu ones. But I
afraid this strain is not the province of a few extremists. It has at
its heart a view about
religion and about the interaction between
religion and politics that is not compatible with pluralistic, liberal,
open-minded societies…At the extreme end of the spectrum are
terrorists, but the world view
goes deeper and wider than it is
comfortable for us to admit. So by and large we don’t admit it.”
The former PM’s remarks came as David Cameron prepared to make a
Commons statement about the Woolwich murder on 2nd of June afternoon.
The statement would come just hours after the first meeting of the
Prime Minister’s Tackling Extremism and Radicalisation Task Force
(TERFOR) – made up of senior Ministers, MI5, police and moderate
religious leaders. Whitehall sources said that it would be a
‘preliminary meeting’ to draw up the agenda for a full meeting within
days. The group, which the Muslim Foreign Office Minister Baroness
Warsi, would examine new powers to muzzle hate preachers.
In his article, Mr Blair, suggested that ‘the problem within Islam’
could start to be tackled by ‘educating
children about faith here and
abroad’. Sir Malcolm Rifkind, a former Foreign Secretary and chairman
of the Parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee, said: “Much
of what Tony Blair says is sensible The Islamic terrorists who
kill people have the silent
support of many more in their community who
share their ideology, if not their methods. But even combined,
represent only a small minority of British Muslims, and we must never
forget that. However, he appears to be still trying to justify the Iraq
War rather than acknowledging that that war provided an unprecedented
opportunity for the Sunni and Shia extremists to slaughter so many of
retrieved on 02.06.2013
there is a problem within Islam
There is no malfunction, distortion, perversion or
error in interpretation. The problem is intrinsic Believing Muslims
threaten, attack, klill & maim kuffar because Allah commands them
to, promises to reward them for it and threatens to damn them if they
issue of Muslim radicalism
The issue is belief, not radicalism. Islam is
one damnable set of doctrines, not two. Neither moderate nor
radical Islam exists, there is only Islam.
ideology which is a strain within Islam
Islam is the ideology; the ideology is Islam.
Salafism & Wahhabism are not the problem; Salafism is builtr
in, intrinsic to Islam. Wahhabism is a call to renewed purity.
the world view goes deeper
The world view is Islam, which divides the world
into Dar-al Islam where Allah’s writ runs and Dar al-Harb, where it
does not and Islam wages war. .
In which New Testament Book, Chapter & verse did
Jesus Christ sanctify, command & exemplify terrorist, genocidal
conquest? Skip the Islamic tactic of passing off parables,
allegories and metaphors as imperatives! Show us the functional equivalents
of these gems of Islamic scripture & tradition:
Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.
Christians who shoot abortionists or bomb their
clinics act in contravention of Christ’s teaching & example.
Christ told his disciples to shake the dust from their shoes and depart
when rejected. Moe told his followers to wage war when rejected.
A few Morons can not discern the difference; most politicians conceal
it because they do not want to face demands for the extinction of
view about religion
Islam is a way of life, not a religion; it dictates
all facets of human life from conception to burial. The religious
component serves as a social control mechanism, troop motivator and
camouflage to prevent its victims from recognizing it as a
predator. Sunan Abu Dawud, Book 23, #3455 informs us that
Jihad is their “original
religion“, preferable to agriculture and commerce as a source of
income. Abandoning Jihad leaves Muslims in a state of disgrace
which Allah will not lift from them until they return to it.
view goes deeper and wider than it is
comfortable for us to admit
Politicians can not admit the fact that Islam is the
enemy, an implacable predator engaged in existential conflict which can
only be resolved by extinction. When warriors believe that their
eternal destiny is entirely dependent on their participation in
genocidal conquest, they are going to participate, because they want to
go to the celestial bordello, not to Hell.
Islamic law requires a minimum of one military
expedition against infidels in every year. If Jihad is possible but not
performed, all who know of the obligation are “in sin”. That obligation
is laid down in The Reliance of The Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.1;
reasonable people will read it and curse Islam.
Islamic law defines Jihad as war against
non-Muslims in The Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.0.
What politician will admit that, according to Islamic law, Jihad
is undertaken on Islamic initiative :”The caliph makes war on Jews, Christians and
Zoroastrians” without provocation?
educating children about faith
Those lying politicians need to be ‘educated’ with a
ball bat, bucket of tar and bag of feathers. When they say “educate”
they mean “indoctrinate”. There is a difference. Only a damned
fool thinks that, by filling the heads of children with malignant
malarkey, Islam will be redefined and reformed. Instead, they will
eventually be introduced to the authentic texts of Islam and become
informed and the politicians who filled their heads with lies will be
silent support of many more in their community who
share their ideology
The Qur’an defines believers as those who sold their
souls to and fight for Allah; those who fight in his cause. Islam
is not cafeteria Catholicism; it is an all or nothing package deal. I
disrespectfully direct the attention of doubters, dissenters &
deniers to 2:85
which tells Muslims that they will go to hell for rejecting parts of
the Qur’an they disagree with.
won’t identify the ideas in the enemy ideology. They
describe those ideas as dark, totalitarian and bankrupt, but they fail
to identify them. I am about to do something they won’t do:
identify the most significant ideas in the enemy ideology.
Allah has the right to be worshiped.
expression occurs frequently in the Hilali & Khan translation of
the Noble Qur’an. I found it in 35 of the 114 surahs. Here is one
And your Ilâh (God) is One Ilâh (God – Allâh), Lâ ilâha illa Huwa
(there is none who has the right to be worshipped but He), the Most
Beneficent, the Most Merciful.
only Allah has the right to be worshiped, then religions other than
Islam are prohibited.
Allah has the right to rule.
It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allâh and His Messenger
have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their
decision. And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger, he has indeed
strayed in a plain error.
not operating on the principle of Shari’ah must be overthrown and
replaced by Islamic regimes.
are obligated to enforce Allah’s rights.
is the relationship between Allah and the Muslims? It is a master:
slave relationship, one to many. Why does Allah need Muslims; what does
he want them for? To do his wet work. Surah At-Taubah 111 makes this
clear, read it and curse Islam. [Emphasis added for clarity.]
Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their
lives and their
properties; for the price that theirs shall be the
Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill
(others) and are killed.
It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah)
and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his
covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have
concluded. That is the supreme success .
is Allah’s cause? His cause is to make Islam dominate the world. How do
I know this? By Allah’s word and hadith.
It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the
religion of truth (Islâm), to make it
all religions even
though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in
the Oneness of Allâh) hate (it).
Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 65:
Narrated Abu Musa:
man came to the Prophet and asked, “A man fights for war booty; another
fights for fame and a third fights for showing off; which of them
fights in Allah’s Cause?” The Prophet said, “He who fights that Allah’s Word (i.e. Islam) should be
superior, fights in Allah’s Cause.”
9:111, a bargain is mentioned, what is it? The bargain is the sale of
their souls to Allah. We learn more about it in Surah As-Saff. It is
the commerce which saves a Muslim from the fire and assures his
admission to the celestial
O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you
from a painful torment.
That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you
strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your
lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!
you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens
under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn
Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.
And also (He will give you) another (blessing) which you love, help
from Allâh (against your enemies) and a near victory. And give glad
tidings (O Muhammad ) to the believers.
O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked
to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to
the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the
Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as
compared with the Hereafter.
9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you
by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to
do all things.
are contained in Surah Al-Anfal & Surah At-Taubah. They are fight
until loops, with neither geographic nor chronological limits.
And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism:
i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will
all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease
(worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer
of what they do.
Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until
they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves
orders to fight are confirmed by Moe in this hadith.
Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I
have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the
right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our
prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood
and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them
except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated
Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes
the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says,
‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during
the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is
a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims
this, we turn to Maududi’s Jihad
Open it to page 15.
merely a religious creed or a set of rituals but it is a comprehensive system
that tends to annihilate alltyrannical and evil systems in the world and to enforce its own
reformation programme which it deems best in the
interest of mankind.
one more page.
eliminate the hegemony of un-Islamic systems replacing them with a
balanced social and cultural order called the Word of Allah by the holy
will not be satisfied with reconquering Israel, Spain, Greece, etc.
Their objective is total global conquest.
religious obligation to participate in the annual
disbelievers is fard al-kifaya, binding on all eligible Muslim men
until a sufficient number have reported to the battlefront.
religious obligation to defend Dar al-Islam is fard ayn: binding on all
eligible male Muslims, plus slaves and adolescents. If the Muslims are
overrun, the fard extends to women, children, sheikhs and slaves.
The Innocence of Islamic Jihad: True or false?
The video was uploaded at midnight July 4. As of 12:16 it had 24
While the greater part of the video is true and
easily verifiable, it ends with two egregious errors. Imran
Firasat allowed his optimism to overcome rational thought.
Jihad can not be removed from the Islamic doctrine
set. While Muslims are Muslims, we can not live in peace with
them. We can live in peace with apostates or dead Muslims, but
not with living Muslims who believe in and attempt to implement Allah’s
imperatives, threat & promise.
Pakistan’s Brig. S.K. Malik gave us the key to
victory in page 60 of The
Quranic Concept of War: we must destroy their faith; cause
them to abandon belief in Allah, his imperative, threat &
The Qur’an citations in the video are listed below, each linked to a
table of parallel translations.
The most authentic traditions concerning Jihad are
found in Sahih Bukhari’s Books of Jihad, Khumus & Expedition. The placards boasting of world
domination have their origin in three of Ibn Kathir’s Tafsirs:
- http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//3.9075.html .
For more detail about Jihad, see:
- Hasan Al-Banna: Jihad
- Jihad: The Forgotten Obligation
- Maududi: Jihad In Islam
- Ibn Taymiyyah The Religious and Mora Doctrine of Jihad
- Suhas Majumdar Jihad:
The Islamic Doctrine of Permanent War
While I was writing this review, the number of
viewings grew to 274, a good start considering the date and time of
release. This video lives up to its trailer, I am satisfied with
the production quality and factual content. I understand that
Muslims will not agree with my verdict. I have given you the
resources you need to verify the facts and explore the context of the
We Are Prey; Its Open Season: Get rid of the Predators!
Bare Naked Islam posted a most revealing video,
one that must be heard to be appreciated. In this video, Yasir Qadhi
lays bare the evil core of Islam, which, fully exposed, can be
recognized as pure evil. Listen carefully to what he said,
contemplate it carefully, and contumaciously demand the
eradication of Islam from the face of the earth.
This exposure of normative Islamic doctrine flows
from the lips of the Imam of a mosque in Memphis, Tn. His accent and
the poor audio quality make listening difficult. I pulled a
transcript, which appears to be the product of speech to text software
so I will attempt to correct it as much as I can.
Full comprehension of what the Imam is preaching
will not come without reference to the canonical Islamic texts he is
teaching from. I will display the quotes he uses with links to
source texts. Note the highlighted clauses running parallel to
those in the transcript below.
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah ‘s Apostle said, ” I have been ordered to fight with the people
till they say, ‘None has the right to be
worshipped but Allah,’ and whoever says,
‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,’ his life and property
will be saved by me except for Islamic law, and his accounts
will be with Allah, (either to punish him or to forgive him.)”
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till
they say: ‘None
has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so,
pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood
and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with
them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated
Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes
the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says,
‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during
the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is
a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims
Imam Bukhari’s hadith collection is considered by Islamic scholars to
be the most authentic and accurate of all the collections. The
order to wage war, whose terminal condition is conversion to Islam,
comes from the Qur’an.
(disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and
the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the
world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then
certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do. The Order to fight to eradicate Shirk and Kufr
Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been
forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not
the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing
submission, and feel themselves subdued. The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They
give the Jizyah
Since Allah and Moe are to be obeyed and Moe is to be emulated, in all
places & at all times, the orders to wage war are binding on
Muslims at the present time.
Messenger (Muhammad ).” But if they turn away, then Allâh does not like
33:21. Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad
) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting
with) Allâh and the Last Day and remembers Allâh much.
definition of shirk:
0:03 to make a partner along with Allah of hannibal with them
0:07 and realized and that obviously shirk
0:10 hich is the opposite of [unintelligible] the must bind
effectively and by definition be the
0:13 most evil of all evils
0:16 Jews and Christians are mushrik our perspective of compete
as we have
0:19 studied with understand how and all of the most of their point of
0:24 and it is also this game
0:27 reason for the same principle of tawhid which is the first
0:31 of every single human being
0:34 that he bears witness any testified that
there is no no deity worthy of
accept Allah the lesson panel with them
0:40 and it is because of the statements of delegate that the prophet
0:45 think he was better than had been commanded to do if you had
0:48 jihad using means an article in the midst of
0:52 it is a means to establish the lead on the line
0:55 only total popular not checked out your schedule and i think that
in the law i
been commanded to fight the people until they testified that
you have in
1:03 the law
1:04 so the whole reason why i must have had without them
1:07 has created a
1:08 i think the profits and review of the books
1:11 and differentiated i think the pundits principal and allowed could
1:16 is debated ended the principle of
and property of ia mushrik
1:27 in the state of jihad
1:29 noticed i think indicated in jihad, not at all times and places
life and property of a mushroom becomes halal
in a state of jihad
1:41 out the profits a little effect on the quickly before i have been
the people until they state that there is no deity worthy of worship
except Allah and when they say
their life and property become protected from me
1:50 when they think that you had a lot their life and property become
1:55 which means if they do not
say it into law their life and property become halal
1:59 for the muslims
2:01 so the christians do commit shirk they are kuffar and they are
mushrikun and beyond which he
2:06 the mushy quote unnoticed flutie
2:11 you know i think the spiritual purity which can only be clarified
2:15 purity of
2:16 Allah called the mushy quit notice which is a very evil thing with
a look and
2:20 fell soda machine called barnett ist a lot of calling them notice
2:25 if you’ll be include resistance
The Imam has not only demonized us, calling us najis
(ritually unclean, equivalent to excrement), accusing us of shirk
(ascribing partners to God), but he has declared war upon us, saying
that our lives and property are fair game; implying open season without
Normative Islamic doctrine, which the Imams preach
in every mosque, contravenes the basis of our civilization: the
outlawing of offensive assault. It contravenes our God given
rights, enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, to life &
Islam is predation, sanctified by situational
scripture from a false prophet; a profiteer. Muslims are
predators. They are due no respect. They are due no tolerance. There
can be no right to engage in predation on Jews & Christians.
Muslims and their institutions must be expelled and excluded from our
I urge & exhort all American citizens to sign the International
Qur’an Petition.. European lovers of life & liberty should
email this url to their Member of
Parliament & MEP.
Pamela Geller and Michael Ghouse argued about Islam & Jihad on Sean Hannity’s radio show. You can listen to the audio here. The title of this post reflects a phrase used by twice by Ghouse in this debate. This debate is in the context of revelation of the fact that John Brennan, nominated to head the CIA, is one of the enemy, a slave of Allah.
Thick accents and rapid speech make this argument hard to follow, but its context and content are extremely important. Mike is a liar: he asserted that “there is no offensive warfare in Islam”, that Islam only fights defensively. Pamela exhibits cognitive dissonance: at once demanding that violent imperatives be expunged from the Koran and acknowledging the impossibility of expunging them.
Muslim supremacists are super arrogant, condescendingly assuming us to be so stupid & gullible that their lies will never be fact checked. With the exception of Risala, which is only available on the web, the books you should be reading are available at Amazon and other book stores. The internet makes some of these texts available to those of us who are not sufficiently affluent to accrue large libraries.
The Muslim appointed to head the CIA claims that Jihad is a “legitimate concept” of self-purification & control in Islam. Each of the six canonical hadith collections, considered the most authentic by Islamic scholars, has a book of Jihad or expedition. I invite you to search each of those books and extract from them the ahadith relating to Jihad an-Nafs. What proportion of those books relate to offensive warfare against infidels and what proportion relate to wrestling with one’s ego? [Riyad us-salihin, Tirmidhi, al Nisa'i & Ibn Majah are large pdf files that may take some time to load. If you read Riyad & Tirmidhi, you will have most of the bases covered; there is much redundancy..]
- Sahih Bukhari
- Khan’s translation
- Bewley’s Translation (more complete, numbered differently and not anchored)
- Riyad as-Salihin
- Sahih Muslim
- Sunan Abu Dawud
- Malik’s Muwatta
- Sunan al-Nasa’i
- Sunan Ibn Majah
Ghouse asserts that Jihad asghar is strictly defensive: he is a liar; I submit proof! Reliance of the Traveller, cited by Geller in the debate, defines Jihad as war against non-Muslims. Here is the full quote, with links added for reference.
Chapter O9.0: Jihad
(O: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad.
“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad.”
The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:
-1- “Fighting is prescribed for you” (Koran 2:216);
-2- “Slay them wherever you find them” (Koran 4:89);
-3- “Fight the idolators utterly” (Koran 9:36);
and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:
“I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah”;
and the hadith reported by Muslim,
“To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it.”Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.)
Islamic law describes the obligation to wage war against passive infidels as communal: fard al kifaya, which lapses with respect to individuals once a sufficient number have responded. Other obligations, such as Saum & Zakat, are fard Ayn: individually binding. Jihad only becomes fard Ayn when Dar ul-Islam is invaded or threatened. I refer doubters, dissenters & deniers to Reliance O9.1. The obligation to attack passive infidels is described as binding upon Muslims in every year.
Subsequent sections of Chapter 9 inform us that “The caliph makes war on Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians” and “fights all other peoples until they become Muslims. ” I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers: damned fools one and all, to O9.8 & 9.9 for a critical lesson in objective factual reality.
The handbook of Hanifi Fiqh makes it plain with slightly archaic language: war must be carried out continuously, and it is undertaken on Islamic initiative, not in reaction to provocation. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers, damned fools one and all, to Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1, pg. 140 & 141 to obtain a clue.
- The destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the sacred writings which are generally received this effect.
- Marginal Note
- Infidels may be attacked without provocation.
The Sealed Nectar is described As the official biography of the Profit. I now present to you a portion of its Table of Contents. Note the frequent occurrence of terms such as battle and invasion. Islam is so peaceful! The violence started while the Profit was alive, in his last decade though Ghouse would have you believe that it is bida, inserted long after his death. Note the extortion letters dictated and dispatched to neighboring Kingdoms prior to several invasions.
[Emphasis added.] [Source: http://www.sunnipath.com/library/Books/B0033P0000.aspx ]
- The Third Phase: Calling unto Islam beyond Makkah
- Al-Isra’ and Al-Mir‘raj
- The First ‘Aqabah Pledge
- The Second ‘Aqabah Pledge
- The Vanguard of Migration (in the Cause of Allah)
- In An-Nadwah (Council) House The Parliament of Quraish
- Migration of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace)
- Life in Madinah
- The First Phase: The Status Quo in Madinah at the Time of Emigration
- A New Society being built
- A Cooperation and Non-Aggression Pact with the Jews
- The Prophet on the Battlefield
- The Battle of Badr – The First Decisive Battle in the History of Islam
- The Military Activities between Badr and Uhud
- Al-Kudr Invasion
- An Attempt on the Life of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace)
- Invasion of Bani Qainuqa‘
- The Qainuqa‘ Jews breach the Covenant
- As-Sawiq Invasion
- Dhi Amr Invasion
- Ka‘b bin Al-Ashraf, killed
- The Invasion of Buhran
- Zaid bin Harithah leads a Compaign on the Trade Routes of Quraish
- The Battle of Uhud
- A Consultation Assembly for a Defence Plan
- Dividing the Islamic Army into phalanxes and Departure to the Battlefield
- Parading the Army
- Passing the Night between Uhud and Madinah
- The Rebellion of ‘Abdullah bin Ubai and his Followers
- The Remainder of the Islamic Army are on the Move to Uhud
- The Defence Plan
- The Messenger of Allah SWT implants the Spirit of Bravery among his Armed Forces
- Recruitment of the Makkan Army
- Political Manoeuvres of Quraish
- The effort of Quraishite women at waging the Zeal of Men
- The Combat
- Assassination of Asadullah (the Lion of Allah) Hamzah bin ‘Abdul Muttalib
- Bringing the Situation under Control
- From his wife’s lap to Sword-fights and Sorrows
- The Contribution of the Archers squad to the Battle
- The Archers’s Fatal Mistake
- The Most Awkward Hour in the Messenger’s Life
- Mutilation of the Martyrs
- Burial of the Martyrs
- Hamrâ’ Al-Asad Invasion
- The Observations of the Noble Qur’ân on the Battle of Uhud
- Lessons and Moralities
- Military Platoons and Missions between the Battle of Uhud and the Battle of the Confederates
- Al-Ahzab (the Confederates) Invasion
- Invading Banu Quraiza
- Military Activities continued
- Bani Al-Mustaliq (Muraisi‘) Ghazwah Sha‘ban 6 Hijri
- Delegations and Expeditions following Al-Muraisi‘ Ghazwah
- Al-Hudaibiyah Treaty (Dhul Qu‘dah 6 A.H.)
- The Second Stage: A New Phase of Islamic Action
- The Prophet’s Plans to spread the Message of Islam to beyond Arabia
- A Deputation to Abyssinia (Ethiopia)
- Letter to the Vicegerent of Egypt, called Muqawqas
- A Letter to chosroes, Emperor of Persia
- The Envoy to Caesar, King of Rome
- A Letter to Mundhir bin Sawa, Governor of Bahrain
- A Letter to Haudha bin ‘Ali, Governor of Yamama.
- A Letter to Harith bin Abi Shamir Al-Ghassani, King of Damascus
- A Letter to the King of ‘Oman, Jaifer, and his Bother ‘Abd Al-Jalandi
- Post-Hudaibiyah Hostilities
- Dhu Qarad Invasion
- The Conquest of Khaibar (in Moharram, 7 A.H.)
- Sporadic Invasions
- The Compensatory ‘Umrah (Lesser Pilgrimage)
- The Battle of Mu’tah
- The Conquest of Makkah
- The Third Stage
- Hunain Ghazwah
- The Enemy’s march and their Encampment at Awtas
- The war-experienced Man wrongs the Leader’s Judgement
- Reconnoitering the Weapons of the Messenger of Allah SWT
- Reconnoitering the Enemy’s Weapons
- The Messenger of Allah SWT leaves Makkah for Hunain
- The Islamic Army stunned the Archers and the Attackers
- Muslims’ return to the Battlefield, and the fierceness of the Fight
- Reverse of Fortunes and the Enemy’s utter Defeat
- Hot pursuit of the Enemy
- Ta’if Compaign
- The Distribution of the Booty at al-Ji‘ranah
- The Helpers (Al-Ansar) are furious at the Messenger of Allah SWT
- Arrival of the Hawazin Delegation
- Lesser Pilgrimage (Al-‘Umrah) to Makkah and leaving for Madinah
- Missions and Platoons After the Conquest
- The Invasion of Tabuk in Rajab, in the year 9 A.H.
- The underlying Reasons
- General News about the Byzantines and Ghassanide Preparations for War
- Particular News about the Byzantine and Ghassanide preparations for War
- The Muslim Army is leaving for Tabuk
- The Army of Islam at Tabuk
- Returning to Madinah
- The People Who lagged Behind
- The Invasion of Tabuk and its Far-Reaching Ramifications
- The Qur’ânic Verses Relating to this Invasion
- Some Important Events that featured that Year
- Abu Bakr [R] performs the Pilgrimage
- A Meditation on the Ghazawat
The violence flows from Allah’s Jihad imperatives enshrined in the Koran. Obtain a clue from Tafsir Ibn Kathir, which explains them.
- The Order to fight to eradicate Shirk and Kufr
- The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah
Have you seen those signs which declare triumphantly that Islam will dominate the world? Where do Muslims get that idea? Once again, Ibn Kathir has the answer for us.
- The Good News that Islam shall prevail
- The Good News that Muslims will conquer the Known World, and ultimately the Entire World
- The Good News that Muslims will Dominate the People of the Book
We have foolishly allowed an enemy fifth column to invade our territory and infiltrate our government. It is essentially necessary to expel and exclude Muslims from America and Western Civilization. We must first strip off the false mantle of religion, exposing Islam as a mercenary & martial predator preying on the human race. Once exposed and defrocked, Islam can be removed from the penumbra of protection offered by the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause, its institutions closed and Allah’s slaves expelled & excluded.
Please do your part by sharing this blog post with as many people as you can hope to influence. Take the second step by signing the International Qur’an Petition, emailing it to your Representative & Senators.
Bare Naked Islam
embedded this video in a post. It runs 74 minutes, is
claimed to be the full production of Innocence of Muslims. Lets
get it rolling! Cross post, & share, download and save a copy if
you can. The truth must prevail!!!
Documentation of the truth of the trailer:
has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts
to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is
absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence.
None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these
respects all faiths
Respect is given where respect is due. Do we
respect the Mafia? Then why should we respect Islam, which began
as an Arab crime syndicate? I direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers to another blog post which details with full documentation
Moe’s mission & motivation: Islam’s Mercenary Mission.
Is a belief system whose deity demands “great slaughter” as its Profit’s price of
admission to Paradise worthy of respect? Does any sane
person respect a predatory way of life whose “original religion” is Jihad?
Does any believing Christian respect a faith that
denies the deity, crucifixion, death & resurrection of Jesus
Christ, depicts him as inferior to its Profit and reveres him as a genocidal warlord who will complete their genocide of the Jews?
How is it possible to blacken that which is already
black? What pious person who believes in the Almighty Creator
would follow a “Prophet” who, after the commencement of his ministry, married
the six year old daughter of his bosom buddy, raped a prisoner of war and commissioned the murders of his critics?
slander is anything the listener does not like. In our legal
system, truth is an absolute defense against slander and
defamation. “Innocence of Muslims” depicts Moe as a megalomaniac.
Was he a megalomaniac, or does the video defame him? To discover the
answer, turn to this appendix of quotes in The Prophet of Doom and read
relevant quotes from Ishaq, Tabari, the Qur’an & Sahih Bukhari: http://prophetofdoom.net/Islamic_Quotes_Megalomania.Islam
The video depicts Moe as a lustful lecher; is it
true or does it defame him? http://prophetofdoom.net/Islamic_Quotes_Lust.Islam
The video depicts Moe as a warmonger; is it true or does it defame
The video depicts Moe as insane or demon possessed;
is it true or does it defame him? http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.45.5
The video depicts Moe as suicidal; was he suicidal or does it defame
The video depicts Moe as faking the Qur’an; did he
fake it or does it defame him? Why don’t you consult his child
bride for the real answer? Her answer is in Sahih Bukhari 3.30.311. ” I feel that your Lord
hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires.”
Watch the trailer; the casting, acting and
production values leave something to be desired, but the content is
accurate. I have provided links to the Noble Qur’an, Sahih
Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, Sunan Abu Dawud, Tafsir Ibn Kathir and The
Prophet of Doom so that you can determine the truth for
In a just and rational world, documenting the
absolute evil of Islam’s founder and the continuing war crime he
founded would not be left up to amateurs, it would be done by our
government, to the highest professional standards and distributed world
wide as our best weapon in the “war on terrorism”. Defeating Islam requires breaking their faith.
Exposing their profit and demon is the first step in that process. Our
government should be doing it, not bitterly bitching about it!
This video was posted on Facebook, it dates from last year, but the
issues raised in it are current because Pastor Jones is protesting the
death sentence of Iranian Pastor Youcef Nadarkhani and will
burn Qur’ans and images of Moe if he is not set free by April 28.
Pastor Jones has also declared International Judge Muhammad Day to be
celebrated September 11th.
Pastor Terry Jones walked into the liar’s den about a year ago and
submitted to a spew of lies, distortions & insults. The
adversaries spew great volumes of malignant malarkey, Pastor
Jones gets little chance to refute the multitudinous lies.
that Jones listens patiently to their screeds but they interrupt
him when he tries to answer their malignant accusations.
Unfortunately, Pastor Jones is insufficiently
informed and articulate; unable to smoothly & quickly refute
the rapid fire spew of deception coming from his adversaries: Sayed
Hassan Al-Qazwini & Reverend Edwin Rowe .
It is difficult to absorb and think critically about
issues raised when the spew of malignant malarkey flows by so rapidly.
the target rich environment provide by the spew of lies, I have
attempted to transcribe the critical remarks of the principle
participants in the row, minus the comments of the token lawyer.
Due to my poor auditory acuity and miserable typing skills, this will
not be perfect word for word, but will be close enough to communicate
the main points. Please read their words carefully and
examine the evidence I will submit in my commentary to follow.
I have highlighted some crucial words & phrases
and linked them to my comments. Click the highlighted expressions to go
directly to my comment and use your back button to return to your place
in the text.
millions of people around the world and here in detroit.
What are you trying to do and why here?
raise awareness here in America and around the world.
As you might be aware of, I spent thirty years as a
missionary in Europe, during that time I saw the growth of radical
Islam. What we are trying to do is raise an awareness of jihad,
of Shari’ah; we are trying to raise that awareness here in
As we have said many times we have come here to
Dearborn in the spirit of peace, we are not demonstrating against the
rights of Moslems, we are not demonstrating against the mosque there,
we are not demonstrating against the Koran. The Moslems in this
country, if they have come here legally, if they have been born here,
if they have converted to Islam, then they are of course
The only thing we ask is that they honor
and obey and submit to the Constitution of the United
they are willing to do that then our message to them is one of
welcome. If they have come here with a secret hidden agenda which
is definitely possible–we have seen that in Europe.
Moslem leaders here in America have spoken
out; said that they would like to have Shari’ah be a governing force in
certain domestic issues, then our message is to them that they are not
If they have come here as I say, to honor and obey;
submit to the Constitution of the United States, then that is fine. We
are just concerned about that radical element:
we are concerned about
jihad and we are concerned about Shari’ah.
largest mosque in North America; what do you want Terry Jones to
know about Islam?
Pastor ‘Terry Jones to define for us what it is
that he means when he
speaks about Shari’ah.
about any form of government; whether it be Shari’ah, my knowledge of
that is of course somewhat limited, but I realize that it is a
very brutal form of punishment. It involves stoning, it involves other
very cruel forms of punishment
But it not only has to do with Shari’ah, whether it
be any other religion that has any form of governmental force
adapted to it–connected to it, then, of course, we are against
We believe that the United States can only be
governed by the Constitution. As I said, I spent thirty years in
Europe, I traveled around the world–I have seen and believe that the
United States of America is the greatest country in the world.
But it is only great because we have the Constitution. One of the
great aspects of that Constitution is the freedom of speech.
disagree with you.
Jones, why this commotion you are causing in the world and in
Florida? You burned the Koran three weeks ago and of course you
live in a free country and you are entitled to your opinion and every
action you do. But for someone who calls himself a Pastor,
someone who speaks in the name of Jesus–Jesus was a great messenger
who asked his followers to embrace others–to love his enemies–
and I think someone who calls himself Pastor
–I don’t think you have moral grounds to burn the Koran, a divine
book that respects and glorifies
Jesus whom you speak in
his name.. If you read the Koran that you burned three weeks
ago–one month ago, you will find out that almost on every page in the
Koran there is a verse in the Koran glorifying Jesus, so I feel
what you did three weeks ago was an insult against Jesus;
against your own faith because if you
really believe in Jesus then the Koran glorifies Jesus. so when
you burn the Koran you are insulting Jesus. That’s insulting
understand it, here is a definition “Law based on the Koran that
lays down certain duties and penalties for Muslims. “But its much
more than that, Imam.
know–he needs to get educated. of the meaning of the words he is
It seems that he is well misinformed bout
things he has been talking about without having an accurate
understanding of them.
there is no doubt I have never claimed to be an expert on the
Koran. But there are experts all around the world who definitely
have the same opinion…[Crosstalk.]
next to you.
violent terrorist activities, but that’s not the point. The point
is I am making a statement- I am warning against Shaari’ah and against
jihad– that is a very valid point and that is what we are willing to
do if there is no such thing. [Crosstalk.]
clear; we have talked before, I have made it very clear thet there are
of Moslems who are peaceful, who do not desire
that. But there is a radical element of Islam that can not
s be denied. We are not saying he is radical, we are not saying
that the Islamic Center here is radical, we are not saying the Moslems
in Dearborn are radical but there is no doubt about it, ah, there is
radical– we burned a book on March the twentieth, we burned a
book –seven thousand miles away–it is a book–I do not care how holy
you think it is; it is still a book; it is not flesh and blood, it does
not live, it does not breathe, we burned a book and seven thousand
miles away people were killed, so something is definitely wrong.
[Crosstalk.] What we are saying is we are demonstrating against that.
hands; because of what you did here in the U.S.A. twelve innocent
people were killed ?
believe, we believe those people and those governments should be held
We believe that our President, who has done a very poor job so far, we
believe that our President should not only speak out against the
radical element of Islam, we have got to call these countries to
accountability in the U.N. Pakistan, Afghanistan, Indonesia; they have
to change their laws–to adapt their laws to human rights or they
should be removed from the U.N.
because there are zealots in every faith; he calls himself a Christian,
so do you, you read the same Bible ; why the a difference in attitudes?
to defend violence anywhere on the part of the Christian Taliban
anybody else; I am here to say that what happened burning the Koran did
not just burn the Koran, it burned the Sermon on
the Mount, it burned
every statement that Jesus made about loving
about … if you
think people are your
enemies, whether its Shari’ah law or whatever it
is, the statement is very clear, “you have heard it said you shall love
your neighbor and hate your enemy but I say to you: love your enemies
and pray for those who persecute you.”
I don’t happen to think that I have the same enemies
you do, but if those are your enemies, the worst thing that happens
here is that somebody might think that Christianity actually supports
what you did.
I am here to say that there is nothing in the Gospel
that I read that that supports the burning of the Koran
you knew what was happening; given what happened on September 11th,
had to know there would be violence as a result of the burning; I
think the blood is on your hands, for every ounce that was spilled,
because if you knew that your act was gonna create violence,
violence is your violence .
You can not just duck it and say that someone else
did the killing when you knew that your act was going to create the
and I think that, in fact, you burned a whole lot more than the Koran,
So I think first of all we have to say I don’t own your version of
Christianity at all every
statement of Jesus Christ about
We just came out of Holy Week in which Jesus walked
into a very violent city on a donkey in peace and the peaceful Jesus
that I know would never have done what you did. And you knew, because
of all the outpouring of September 11th, that it was going
to create death and I that death is on [Crosstalk.]
call yourself a Christian; would Jesus Christ have done what you
brought books that they thought were dangerous, they brought magic
I think for one thing we’re definitely getting sidetracked and another
thing; I think definitely that he would. In Acts 19:19 we see
very clearly that people [brought book] sworth great sums of money and
We see Jesus went into the Temple; threw out the
money changers. We see every t8ime in the Old Testament that a
new King, a Godly King, came into place, he went down and tore down the
But I think we are missing the point: we are here
not to burn the Koran, we are not here to discuss the burning of the
Koran, we are here to send a very clear message to the radical element
of Islam: that is our message. Just a few months ago we talked about
burning the Koran and then there is violence. Radical Islam does not
need an excuse. Coptic Christians came out of their churches
after a service, and they were just simply killed. We have to
remember the radical element of Islam has been killing people for
hundreds and hundreds of years. Every single thing [Crosstalk.]
stage that protest? We are going to talk more about that; about
the legal issues involved when we come back…
Muslims, Christians joined hands together at the Mosque today. And yet
there are many Americans who fear Islam and what it represents.
people like Pastor Terry Jones who are working on their paranoia, who
are making monster out of Islam. I would respectfully ask
Pastor Terry Jones to go and read the Koran instead of burning the
Koran and he would be amazed and surprised from the commonalities that
exist between Islam and Christianity.
The Problem is Pastor Jones has not read the Koran,
he has no knowledge of the Koran therefore he is trying to make a
monster out of the Koran and by that he is terrifying
Islam and by telling them that Islam is the danger.
Now no one is denying that there are radicals in
Islam as there are radicals in Christianity; I consider him one of the
We have people like Timothy McVeigh who
hundreds of innocent people in Oklahoma ten-fifteen years ago in the
name of Jesus. We have people who committed all kinds
crimes in the name of the church and in the name of Jesus, peace be
upon him. Would I hold Christianity responsible for that? No! I
am not going to do that because I understand in every faith there is a
fringe group who use
religion for their own interest and Islam is no
I would hold 1.5 billion Muslims responsible for
the acts of a small fringe group that has been distorting Islam?
But that does not mean Islam should be held responsible for
them. We all agree that there are people
who have hijacked
Islam and gave it a bad name. So I would invite
Pastor Jones to learn about the Koran, learn about Islam and be able to
distinguish between those fringe groups who in no way would represent
the mainstream of Islam; a divine faith
has so much to offer to
this world and to humanity. The divine faith that speaks highly
of Christianity and of Judaism.
We in our religion believe that someone who does not
believe in Jesus, who does not believe in Moses he can not claim to be
Muslim, so in order to be a true Muslim you have to embrace Jesus and
his message; you have to embrace Moses and his message and it seems
that Pastor Jones does not get that.
Now I want to go back to the Shari’ah law that he
has been talking about. We ask him how does he define the
Shari’ah law; he says that he thinks the Shari’ah law is the brutal
punishment. Now what brutal punishment
is he talking about?
Is he speaking about the stoning? Now let me, for his reference,
the stoning was
referred to in the Bible, not in the Koran.
Now, if he is talking about what the Taliban did in
Afghanistan fifteen years ago, when they were stoning people:
well, Taliban does not represent Islam, everyone
knows that the Taliban rule does not represent the spirit of
Islam. I am someone who numerous times condemned what Taliban did
against people in Afghanistan and I said that these people are
self-declared religious leaders who are not recognized by the
mainstream of Islam, so he can not also hold Islam responsible for the
act of Taliban in Afghanistan when they were stoning people.
Here in America we have six million Muslims; I
challenge pastor Jones if he can bring me one Muslim in the United
States who would say that we have not abided by the U.S.
laws. All these Muslims are abided by the U.S. laws, so let me
ask him this, of course: there is a reference to the stoning in the
Bible, does that mean the Christian in the United States now are
calling for implementing stoning in the United States? This is, I
think, the wrong analogy. So I believe that his understanding of
the Shari’ah law is definitely distorted, he does not have accurate
understanding of what he is telling people; what he is talking about.
He can demonstrate against radical Islam,
that’s his right he can do that and he is entitled to do that but I
also would like to ask him, as I always do when I talk about extremism
and radicalism in other faiths, that I would condemn radicalism
and extremism in my faith first so he has to do the same thing when he
talks about radicals and he means to rally people against radical
Islam, would he also do the same thing by rallying people against
radical Christians? Would he tolerate those who go and blow up
abortion clinics here, what he would call them? are
radicals; why would he not not speak out against them, why he chose to
be silent about those
radicals who call themselves Christians but he only chose to attack
those who call themselves radicals in Islam. So I think this is a
double standard and someone who calls himself Pastor and religious leader; he has
to take the higher ground.
call someone who straps a bomb to himself to kill innocent people; do
you call them martyrs or do you call them terrorists?
Pastor Jones burned three weeks ago calls these people murderer and the
Koran is very clear that if you kill one innocent person you will be
viewed by God as if you have killed the entire mankind. So
of course, someone who kills innocent people
is considered a murderer
in the eyes of God.
And by the way, I would like to take this
opportunity to condemn the killings that took place in Afghanistan
three weeks ago when Pastor Terry Jones burned the Koran.
But I want to say one thing: When Pastor Terry Jones those who
committed that crime and I unequivocally condemn that attack, it was
carried out by lunatic Muslims, these people are not normal people,
these people are lunatics, but who pushed them to do that; someone who
calls himself Pastor, someone
who calls himself religious leader, he pushed them to do that, so yes,
I agree that his …there is blood on his hands for pushing these
lunatics to kill those innocent people at the United nations
Headquarters in Afghanistan and I hold him also partially responsible
for these killings. .
been over seventeen thousand successful terrorist attacks. I mean
to hold us responsible for what someone does seven thousand miles
away is totally ridiculous. You can see that in our own American
History, in our recent history we had the movement by Reverend Martin
Luther King Jr. During that movement, many people were killed but
nobody would say it was Reverend martin Luther King Jr.’s fault.
I think that the Imam–I think that the problem
is they talk the talk but they don’t walk the walk, they talk all
this peace but there’s really no proof of that.
As he said, here in America you have seven million;
you have nine million, so as long as they are in the minority of course
what are they gonna say? “We wanna rise up; we wanna take over”?
“Islam means submission, world domination”, is that what they are going
that what they are going to say? No! You look at Moslem dominated
countries, its not important what a minority says in another country as
long as that minority is a minority, it is important [Cross talk. ]
it is important what a minority does when it becomes a majority; how
does it then treat the minority under them? And in Islam
dominated countries; in Koran dominated countries, we do not see this
peace, peace peace, [Cross talk.]
minorities in this country? I’m not so sure it is.
compare himself to Martin Luther King.
is an absolute lie and its a lie on Jesus and not just Martin Luther
King and what he died for, he was non violent. The act of burning
the Koran was a violent
act; he can’t duck that, the people who died
died and he knew that that violence was going to happen. I think
that blood is on his hands and for him to even say the word Martin
Luther King and the non violent movement that had to do with martin
Luther King–its simply blasphemy and its Islamophobia; its right up
there with racism. I tell you this man is lying about
Christianity, he’s lying about Martin Luther King and he’s lieing
about Islam. he didn’t just burn the Koran, he burned the Sermon
on the Mount.
He burned everything I believe in
when he did that
and everything the Imam believes in and everything that Judaism
believes in and he sits here trying to protect us from a force that
does not exist. Can you name one neighborhood in this
city or in this country that is [under] Shari’ah law? Can you name one
person who us under
Shari’ah law? I can’t and you can’t either. He has
created a fear that has nothing to be afraid of and so that he
can get attention and we’re here because the media is gonna [Cross
Let it Rip, you can agree, to tomorrow, go into the Mosque, join hands
with the Imam and the people there and rally for peace. Will you try to
do that instead of denouncing Islam tomorrow?
to come and join us against terrorism, against the radical element,
against whatever he wants to call it, he can come and join us because
he is [Cross talk.]
Pastor Jones did nothing of the sort; he held a four
hour trial of the Qur’an, found it guilty of incitement to genocidal
violence and sentenced it to burning. His associate, Pastor Sapp
burned the Qur’an.
The subsequent riots were not caused by the trial
& burning, they resulted from incendiary sermons at Jumah Salat.
The rabble were roused to riot by their Imams, not by Pastor Jones.
Pastor Jones accurately described the Qur’an, the
doctrines enshrined in it and the violence it incites. Muslims perceive
insult because they are heavily invested in Islam. Islam is given
to them as the ultimate in good: guidance to faith in Allah, peace,
prosperity & justice. In reality, it is enslavement to Satan,
a life of barren poverty and predation upon the human race.
No sane person who knows what Islam is and what
Muslims are & do will welcome them here, regardless of their
birthplace, citizenship or immigration status. Islam is a way of
life, not a religion. The deen of Islam is couched in terms of religion
in order to conceal its true nature. The “original religion” of Islam is jihad. Jihad is “war against non-Muslims“.
Believers are only
those who “strive with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh“. Muslims are under Allah’s threat of eternal damnation if they do not engage
in jihad. Engaging in jihad is their get out of Hell free card
which will save them from a “painful torment“.
Muslims who “take
to injure or enrage disbelievers are promised extra credit towards an
upgrade to their seat in Allah’s Celestial Bordello. Islam’s founding
Profiteer declared that he was “made victorious with terror“. Muslims are commanded
to emulate a terrorist.
Moe got his income with his spear. Moe was made
wealthy “through conquests“. Do you welcome the
presence of people who esteem him as the best and greatest of men and consider him to be
their role model?
Islam rejects man made laws including the
Constitution. Only Allah’s Shari’ah
is acceptable to Islam. The Qur’an is their constitution; the
hadith are their laws. Compare the table of contents of Sahih Bukhari to the that of Reliance of the Traveller.
Cruel & unusual punishments are unconstitutional, but lapidation,
amputation & lashing are required by Shari’ah. The two are
not compatible; they are polar opposites.
That phrase offends me because it is supremely
dishonest. Postulating the existence of a “radical element”
assumes the existence of a “moderate” mainstream Islam opposed to
“radicalism” or “extremism”. Jihad is not radical, it is
for” Muslims though they “dislike it”.
Terrorism is not “radical”, it is mainstream.
Allah said that he would “cast
terror” and that he “cast terror” so that “a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them)
you made captives“ Allah commanded Muslims to treat victims
harshly so as to “strike
terror” into future victims. he commanded Muslims to maximize
the strength of their army to “terrify
thereby” the enemies of Allah. How was moe “made
The Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides were
not “radical”, they were mainstream. Allah set “great
slaughter” as Moe’s price of admission to his Celestial
Bordello. Moe slaughtered 800 Jews who had surrendered after a two week siege.
Literally: “path to life giving waters”. It is
Islamic law, founded on Allah’s permissions, prohibitions &
imperatives in the Qur’an, exemplified by Moe’s sunnah and extended by
the consensus of the Ulema. The most widely accepted codification
of Shari’ah is Reliance of the Traveller, a 1251 page volume
can obtain from Amazon. In many aspects, it is the most detailed
though Hedaya excells it in a few, such as rules related to sexual
intercourse with slaves. Hedaya has been summarized in two
volumes which can be obtained from Amazon or read on the web, but it is
arcane, archaic and dense. I recommend reading the first two
chapters of Volume II, Book IX. beginning with page 140 where you will see the rules of war
confirmed and amplified.
If you prefer shorter, easier to read books, turn to Risala, the Maliki school’s fiqh.
Moe claimed that he received the Qur’an from Allah,
through Jibril. Of course, nobody else saw or heard Jibril.
There are a few things Muslims do not want you to know about how Moe
received his inspiration & revelations. Moe had epileptic
seizures: snorting like a young camel, sweating, quivering lips & tongue.
Sometimes revelations came in dreams, sometimes he heard a voice and sometimes he heard a bell ringing in his
head. He received revelations while in bed with Aisha, but not with his other wives. Aisha was wise
to him: “It seems to me that your Lord hastens to satisfy your
The Qur’an denies the patrimony,
deity ["not more than a slave"], crucifixion, death & resurrection of
Jesus. In one hadith, Moe depicts Jesus as inferior to himself, unworthy to intercede for sinners. In
another hadith, Jesus is depicted as a genocidal warlord who will
“fight the people” for the cause of Allah and
destroy Christianity. Ibn Kathir, in his tafsir of Surah Al-A’raf 7:167,
informs us that just before the end of the world, “In the future, the
Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary,
will kill the Jews.
The Qur’an contains 113 surahs; Jesus is mentioned
in 19 of them. Surah Al-Baqarah, the longest of surah, contains
286 ayat, of which #s 87, 156 & 253 mention Jesus.
. Sayed Hassan Al-Qazwini insulted the
intelligence of the Fox 2 audience by asserting that
burning a blasphemous text which deprecates Jesus is an insult against
Jesus and Christianity. Allah denies paternity; insulting God by
claiming to be him, insulting Jesus by denial of his deity and
insulting Christians by denial of the tenets of our faith.
Burning a book which insults Jesus is not an insult to Jesus..
Muslims who abjure offensive conquest
insult Allah and Islam by denying that Allah knows best. War against non-Muslims is ordained for Muslims. Islam is inseverable,
an all or nothing package deal: “Then
do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest?
Then what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except
disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they
shall be consigned to the most
The Muslim who does not go to war when called is
going to Hell. “If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will
replace you by another people”. “He who does not join the warlike expedition (jihad),
or equip, or looks well after a warrior’s family when he is away, will be smitten by Allah with a sudden calamity.”
Why does any peace loving person worship a demon who
plans to damn him for shirking offensive conquest? You love
peace, Allah loves war; what do you have in common? Why do you
remain enslaved to him?
Taliban means “students of the Qur’an”. The
Qur’an is an anti-Christian text; Christians read it to know their
enemy. Taliban whip and stone adulterous women, amputate the hands of
thieves and poison school girls. What Christians do those
If Pastor Jones burned the Sermon on the Mount, then he
burned the Bible. No, he burned the Qur’an! Show me the
Surah & ayeh containing the Sermon on the Mount; I want to see it!
My search for it was unsuccessful.
In which Surah & Ayeh does the Qur’an contain
Christ’s command to love your enemies? Where does Allah emulate
it? Show me; I want to verify it!
How do you square “love your enemies with” “to terrify thereby the enemy of God and your enemy” Which book did Pastor Jones
Did you search the Book of Acts? 19:19 Many of them also which used curious arts
brought their books together,
and burned them before all
men: and they counted the price of them, and found it fifty thousand
pieces of silver.
Exactly what did we do to provoke the accursed
abomination? Exactly what did the founders do, between 1776 and
1815, to provoke the Barbary Pirates? Did you know that the
Barbary Pirates said it was because it is written
in their laws? Do you know where it is written in their laws?
- Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387
- Sahih Bukhari 4..53.386
- Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2635
of the Traveller O9.8
Violence is created by those who engage in it, not
by Pastor Jones. He did not tell anyone to riot. He did not urge
anyone to murder. He tried, condemned and executed a book which
exhorts men to murder, wage war, rape and pillage.
On what day of the week did the riots occur?
At what time of the day did they occur? On what day of the week
and what time of day do the Imams deliver their
kutbah? The same pattern was followed when Hell was raised
over the Motoons.
You are creating killing, Reverend Rowe, by
giving Muslims carte blanche to raise Hell and project the blame onto
their critics; ‘Pastor Jones made us do it.’.
Reverend Rowe, exactly where in the Qur’an do you
find Christ’s statements about non-violence? Please cite the
Surah & ayeh numbers so we can look up the references.
What contravenes Christ’s teaching more than “Jihad
is ordained for you…”, “fight them until”, fight those who until”,
“kill them wherever you find them” and “fight those of the disbelievers
nearest you” ?
The Qur’an is what it is: a hate & war manual;
we can make nothing of it, we can not change what it is. Read it;
discover what it is and what it inculcates & incites. I will
make it easy for you.
- Parallel translations
by Pickthal, Shakir & Yusuf Ali.. provided by
parallel translations provided
by Islam Awakened.
- Noble Qur’an translated by Hilali & Khan with
translator’s footnotes provided by the King Fahd Complex.
- The Arabic text translated to English word by word
provided by Corpus Qur’an.
“It doesn’t say that; doesn’t mean that;
misinterpreted.” Prove it!!! Take your case up with the experts;
Who knew the meaning of the Qur’an better than the
man who first recited it? Is jihad inner struggle against your
ego or is it offensive conquest? Read Sahih Bukhari’s Book of Jihad
and see for yourself. What did the Profiteer say and do
about jihad? Can you obtain a clue from the codified oral
traditions of Moe’s companions?
In which New Testament book, chapter &
verse did Jesus Christ command his disciples to wage offensive war,
engage in terrorism and commit genocide? In which New Testament
book, chapter & verse did he exemplify such acts for his disciples
Moe did those things, Jesus did not; Muslims thus
engaged obey Allah and emulate Moe, Christians thus engaged contravene
the teaching of Jesus.
What did Tim say or do to involve Jesus in his
massacre? Did he utter and publish a statement dedicating the
bombing to Christ? Did he shout “Jesus is Lord!”? What
evidence of religious motivation for the attack do you have? Show
Who would use religion for personao emolument? Who
would contrive a ‘religion’ for his personal emolument &
empowerment? Who would contrive a ‘religion’ for the purpose of
accruing income, wealth and sex slaves? Who did that??? To
whom do the spoils belong? How could an impotent stone idol eat
looted food, ride looted camels or sport with captured women?
What was Moe’s prime motivating factor? What did Allah promise
Moe? What did Allah deliver? How was Moe made
wealthy? Who were spoils made lawful for? Who received the
keys to the treasures of the world from Allah?
What did Allah say about jihad? What did Moe
say and do about jihad? What did Allah say about terror?
What did Allah do about terror? What did Moe say and do about
terror? What does Shari’ah say about jihad?
Exactly what is Islam that terrorists have distorted
it? If Islam is not what Allah & Moe said & did, then
what is it??
- I have been ordered to fight the people till they say:
‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’
Prophet sent a Sariya towards Najd and I was in it, and our share from
the booty amounted to twelve camels each, and we were given an
additional camel each.
- Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is
derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the
- The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and
- The caliph fights all other peoples until they become
shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve,
- I will
- to strike terror
- Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening
my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.
- I have been made victorious with terror
Who hijacked Islam? When and where did they hijack
Islam? Read the questions asked and answers listed under the
heading distorting Islam and get a
What is divine about Islam? How can the product of
hallucinatory seizures & situational scripture be divine?
Refer to the evidence linked under the heading of divine book above.
When spewing a rapid fire stream of malignant
malarkey in a half hour t.v. show with three other guests, it is easy
to get away with telling big lies. Pastor Jones did not have
sufficient air time to refute that lie, but I can refute it in this
blog post. Allah leaves no doubt about his attitude toward
Judaism & Christianity. When Muslims attend the five
obligatory salat, they recite Surah Al-Fatiha 17 times each day,
reminding Allah why he wants to burn us.
Guide us to the Straight Way
The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of
those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went
astray (such as the Christians).
We “earned anger” & “went astray”. See how highly Islam speaks of
Islam curses us, beyond the compulsory salat.
Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it
is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind,
And the Jews say: ‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians
say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths.
They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on
them, how they are deluded away from the truth!
Islam curses us, that must be high praise indeed. It also
calls us the “worst of living creatures”.
- 8:55. Verily, The worst of moving (living)
creatures before Allâh are those who disbelieve , – so they shall not
Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and
Prophet Muhammad ()) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and
Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are
the worst of creatures.
Yes, lapidation is mentioned in the Bible, but not
in the Qur’an because a sheep ate the verse of rajab..
- John 8:7
So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto
them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at
- Sahih Muslim 17.4194
has Caliph Umar verifying the recital of the verse of stoning and the
fact that it was carried out in the time of the Profit.
- Sunan Ibn Majah, Volume 3, page 113
- 1944. It was narrated that
‘Ashah said: “The Verse of
stoning and of breast feedmg an
adult ten times was revealed, and
the paper was with me under my
pillow. When the Messenger of Allah died, we were
preoccupied with his death, and a
tame sheep came in and ate it.” (Hasan)
- 1944. It was narrated that
- Sahih Muslim17.4196 and the immediate context
indicated that Moe practiced lapidation.
- See Sunan Abu Dawud 38.4339 for further confirmation.
Moe ordered lapidation, Jesus stopped one;
which is morally superior?
How many Christians shoot abortionists or blow up
their clinics? How does the number of such incidents compare to
the number of terrorist attacks by Muslims? In which New
Testament book, chapter & verse did Jesus command his disciples to
kill abortion doctors or bomb their clinics?
The accusation is a form of the argumentum tu-quoque
fallacy; a diversion, not a defense. Nothing that any Christian
has done in contravention of the teaching of Jesus subtracts anything
from the intrinsic evil of Islam.
Imam Al-Qazwini provided a prime example of kitman:
Islamic deception by obfuscation. He slyly refers to Surah
which prescribes punishments for ‘waging war against Allah’.
What is the meaning of “wage war against Allah”? For
the answer, we must turn to Tafsir Ibn kathir: “`Wage war’ mentioned here
means, oppose and contradict,
and it includes disbelief,
blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways.”
If you do not believe in Allah, you are waging war
against him: subject to decapitation, crucifixion, amputation or
expulsion; you are not innocent. Only
Muslims can be innocent.
Detonating a bomb in a crowd is a violent act.
Shooting people is a violent act. Rioting is violent. Burning a book
which is your own personal property, under controlled conditions is not
a violent act. Pastor Jones did no harm in judging and destroying a
Qur’an. There is no logical connection between that act and the riots
incited by Imams in Afghanistan.
The outrageous hyperbole of Reverent Rowe serves to
give Muslims a free pass for anything they do; a ready excuse. They can
simply project their own evil intentions onto innocent, non-violent
What do you believe in, Reverend Rowe?
Christianity is defined in the Gospels, Acts & letters of the
Apostles, not in the Qur’an. Islam portrays Jesus as a genocidal
warlord. If Pastor Jones burned what you believe in, then you are a
Muslim, not a Christian; an apostate and impostor.
In the last three decades, 50
trial and appellate cases involving Shari’ah have been heard in
The hypocrisy of Congressional Bigotry
Fatwa on Islam brought this video to my attention. I had read a little
about the controversy but had not delved deeply into it. I can’t let
this slide by without a blast of the torch. We find Christopher S.
Murphy on the floor of the House, wasting precious time.
Istanbul Process: Censorship Through Subterfuge
fall session of the Istanbul Process has concluded; while we await
publication of their report we can reflect on the manifold deceptions
which passed the lips of two participants. I have selected the
most important phrases out of context for criticism.
- Amb. Suzan Johnson Cook’s welcoming address with video:
that will advance respect for religious freedom and religious tolerance
around the world.
It is not possible to advance respect for religious
freedom & tolerance where Allah’s writ runs. There is neither
tolerance nor respect for religions other than Islam in Egypt, Saudi
Arabia and other nations dominated by Islam. The positive
attitudes desired by Amb. Cook do not and can not exist there
because of the doctrines of Islam.
- Non-Muslims are cursed.
Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it
is they on whom is the Curse
of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind, combined.
Say (O Muhammad ) to those who disbelieve: “You will be defeated and gathered
together to Hell, and worst indeed is that place to rest.”
And the Jews say:
‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians say: Messiah
is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate
the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on them, how
they are deluded away from the truth!
- Only Islam is accepted.
Truly, the religion with Allâh
Those who were given the Scripture (Jews and Christians) did not differ
except, out of mutual jealousy, after knowledge had come to them. And
whoever disbelieves in the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, signs,
revelations, etc.) of Allâh, then surely, Allâh is Swift in calling to
And whoever seeks a religion
other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the
Hereafter he will be one of the losers.
- Unbelief is a great evil under Shari’ah..
- Unbelief is the vilest
form of corruption, as goes without saying. [Reliance of the
- Leaving Islam is the
ugliest form of unbelief (kufr) and the worst. [08.0]
- …a non-Muslim has no
right to authority and hence no right to raise a Muslim. [M13.2]
divide that pits religious sensitivities against freedom of expression
For the full quote, turn to page 35 of the April ’11 Islamophobia Report.
Hillary’s assertion is malignant. Islam demands that all criticism of
Islam be squelched, which is clear in the text of previous HRC & GA
resolutions “Combating Defamation of Religions“.
Reliance of the Traveller defines apostasy with a
list of twenty acts which entail leaving Islam [O8.7]
Those acts include reviling Allah, Muhammad or Islam and denial of any
Islamic law or doctrine. The penalty for apostasy is execution,
specified in the second section of chapter 8. [O8.1]
The same rule and punishment are imposed upon conquered Jews &
Christians living in Dar ul-Islam as Dhimmis: -5- or mentions something impermissible
about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or
The penalty imposed upon a Dhimmi who blasphemes is the same as he
would suffer when captured in battle, one of four choices by the Imam,
death being the first listed. [O9.14]
The OIC demanded prosecution of the publisher of the
Motoons and demanded that the Dutch government block the publication of
Fitna. After the publication, they demanded prosecution. Egypt is
demanding that publication of Wilders’ upcoming book be blocked.
16/18 secured an international consensus around an action-oriented
approach to combat religious intolerance in line with respect for
universal human rights—including religious freedom and freedom of
“Respect for freedom of expression” yeah, right. The
following paragraph occurs on page two of the resolution:
serious instances of derogatory
profiling and stigmatization of persons based on their religion or
belief, as well as programmes
and agendas pursued by extremist organizations and groups
aimed at creating and
perpetuating negative stereotypes about religious groups, in
when condoned by Governments;
“Derogatory stereotyping ” & “negative stereotypes” are
encrypted references to associating Islam with
terrorism. Last year’s GA resolution expresses it this
terrorism, as this
may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom
or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned;
Oh, but that meme has been abandoned, hasn’t it? Yeah, right. Two
resolutions came out of the Third Committee in November, one based on
A/C.3/66/L.48/Rev.1 : “Elimination of all forms of
intolerance and of discrimination based on religion or belief”.
be equated with terrorism, as this
may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom
or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned;
Islam = terrorism because Allah said that he would
cast terror, did cast terror & Moe said that it made him
victorious. I present to you relevant, verifiable proof from the
Qur’an, Tafsir Ibn Kathir & Sahih Bukhari, the most authentic of
the six canonical hadith collections.
- 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those
- …Allah next conveys the good news that He will put fear of
Muslims, and feelings of subordination to the Muslims in the hearts of
their disbelieving enemies, because of their Kufr and Shirk. … The Prohibition of Obeying the Disbelievers; the Cause
of Defeat at Uhud
- 7:4. How many a township have We
destroyed! As a raid
by night, or while they slept at noon, Our terror came unto them.
- Our torment came upon them by
night or while they were taking their midday nap. ) means, Allah’s
command, torment and vengeance came over them at night or while taking
a nap in the middle of the day. Both of these times are periods of rest
and leisure or heedlessness and amusement. Nations that were destroyed
- 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the
angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I
will cast terror into the hearts of those
who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all
their fingers and toes.”
- …(I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have
means, `you — angels — support the believers, strengthen their
(battle) front against their enemies, thus, implementing My command to
you. I will cast
fear, disgrace and humiliation over those who defied My command and
denied My Messenger,
(so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers
toes.) strike them on their foreheads to tear them apart and over the
necks to cut them off, and cut off their limbs, hands and feet….Allah commands the Angels to fight and support the
- 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to
the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into
(the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others
besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye
shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall
not be treated unjustly.
- (to threaten), or to strike
fear, the enemy of Allah and your enemy), the disbelievers, Making Preparations for War to strike Fear in the
Hearts of the Enemies of Allah
- 33:26. And those of the people of the
Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allah brought them down
from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so
that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made
- (and cast terror into their
hearts means fear, because they had
supported the idolators in their war against the Messenger of Allah and
the one who knows is not like the one who does not know. They had
terrified the Muslims and intended to kill them so as to gain earthly
power, but their plans backfired; the idolators ran away and the
believers were victorious while the disbelievers were losers; where
they had aimed for glory, they were humiliated. The Campaign against Banu Qurayzah
He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the
Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Bani An-Nadir) from their
homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get
out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from
Allah! But Allah’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they
expected it not, and He cast terror into
their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own
hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with
eyes (to see).
- …Therefore, Allah
sent His torment down on them;
it can never be averted, and His appointed destiny touched them; it can
never be resisted. The Prophet forced them to evacuate and abandon
their fortified forts that Muslims did not think they would ever
control. …Then take admonition, O you with eyes.) meaning,
“Contemplate the end of those who defied Allah’s command, contradicted
His Messenger and denied His Book. See how Allah’s humiliating torment
struck them in this life, as well as, the painful torment that Allah
has reserved for them in the Hereafter.”… The End that Bani An-Nadir suffered
- 59:13. Of a truth ye are stronger (than they)
because of the terror in their hearts, (sent) by
God. This is because they are men devoid of understanding.
- …(Verily, you
are more fearful in their breasts than Allah.)
meaning, the hypocrites fear you more than they fear Allah, as He
says; (Behold! a section of them fear men as they fear Allah or
more.)… The False Promise of Support the Hypocrites gave to the Jews
- 8:57. So if you gain the mastery over them in
war, punish them
severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they
may learn a lesson.
- …(then disperse those who are behind them,) by severely
﴿the captured people﴾ according to Ibn `Abbas, Al-Hasan Al-Basri,
Ad-Dahhak, As-Suddi, `Ata’ Al-Khurasani and Ibn `Uyaynah. This
Ayah commands punishing them harshly and inflicting casualties on them.
This way, other enemies, Arabs and non-Arabs, will be afraid and take a
lesson from their end,… Striking Hard against Those Who disbelieve and break
- Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:
Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:
The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given
to any one else before me.
1. Allah made me
victorious by awe, (by His
frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey. .
- Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the
shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror(cast
in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the
treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.“
Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you,
people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not
benefit by them).
“Programs and agendas pursued by extremist
organizations” is an encrypted reference to the Dutch and Austrian
Freedom Parties and the American Tea Party. They want to make the
Tea Party and negative expressions about Islam in campaign
advertisements illegal. If you doubt this, read the April ’11 Islamophobia Report, pages 3, 6 & 49
on states to take specific measures to combat religious intolerance
The call comes on page 2 of the resolution.
and related violence, as well as of negative stereotyping of
individuals on the basis of
religion or belief, continue to rise around the world, and condemns, in
this context, any
advocacy of religious hatred
against individuals that constitutes incitement to
discrimination, hostility or
violence, and urges
States to take effective measures, as set forth
in the present resolution, consistent
with their obligations under international human rights
law, to address and
combat such incidents;
- incidents of
- intolerance: Islamophobia
- negative stereotyping: Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of
Islam :. Muslims are terrorists.
- avocacy of religious hatred
- constitutes incitement
- violence: any & every criticism of Islam, exemplified
by Fitna, the Motoons & Qur’an burning
- effective measures: legislation and its enforcement
- consistent with their obligations under international human
rights law: International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights(ICCPR)
1. Everyone shall have the right to hold
opinions without interference
Everyone shall have the right
to freedom of expression: this right
shall include freedom to seek, receive, and impart information and
ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing
or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of this
The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and
responsibilities. It may therefore
be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such
provided by law and are necessary.
(a) For respect of the rights
or reputations of others;
(b) For the protection of
national security or of public
order (ordre public), or of public
health or morals.
1. Any propaganda for war shall be
prohibited by law
Any advocacy of national,
racial or religious hatred that constitutes
incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited
That article 20 does
not authorize or require legislation or other action by the United
States that would restrict the
right of free speech and association protected by the
Constitution and laws of the United States.
Several of the resolutions make allusion to 19.3, attempting to
stretch 19.3.a to cover Islam. Note that the U.S.A. reserved our
First Amendment right of free expression. Several resolutions
bitterly kvetch about that reservation, demanding its repeal. The HRC
has an Ad Hoc
Committee on Elaboration of Complementary Standards
whose mission is to write a binding protocol which will insert the
provisions of previous defamation of Islam resolutions into one of the
human rights covenants.
Define advocacy of hatred that constitutes
incitement. Exactly what does that expression in 20.2 mean in the real
world. For the answer, we must turn to the Secretary General.
Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban
said in a statement. “The right
of free expression is not at stake here.”
According to Ban, the short documentary by Geert Wilders meets the test
of 20.2. There is one little problem: Fitna is an exposure of
incitement, it is not incitement. I direct doubters &
dissenters to this blog post which documents Fitna’s scriptural
citations: The intention of HRC 16/18 is to criminalize Fitna, the
blog post and every criticism of Islam.
rights include the right to believe and the right practice a religion
not sanctioned by the state — or no religion at all.
Who can argue with the right to belief &
practice of religion? Islam does, and I can, too! The
existence of a right to practice Islam is an impossibility because the
practice of Islam entails genocide, terror,plunder, extortion, &
rape. This fatal fact is fully documented here:
Right to Practice Islam!
Allah said that only he has the right to be
worshiped. Get a clue.
Allâh! Lâ ilahâ illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He),
the Ever Living, the One Who sustains and protects all that
- O11.5 -6- are forbidden to openly display
wine or pork, (A: to ring
church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud,
or make public display of their
funerals and feastdays; -7- and are forbidden to build new churches.
Islam does not accept the UDHR,
it substituted the Cairo Declaration,
which makes Shari’ah the bottom line. I just quoted the relevant
Shari’ah for you. Get a clue: scroll to the end of the declaration and
read Articles 24 & 25. Its Shari’ah, stupid, refer to
Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 11.5, quoted above.
Freedom of religion is a one way street: for Muslims only.
purpose is to advance religious freedom, promote religious tolerance,
and combat discrimination on the basis of religion or belief—consistent
with universal human rights principles.
The purpose is permanently frustrated because Islam does not and will
not allow religious freedom or tolerate religions and
discriminates against indigenous religious minorities.
Those flaws are intrinsic to the core of Islam and can not be altered
or removed because Islam can not be reformed.
religious minorities and protect freedom of expression
Indigenous Christians in Egypt & Pakistan will
be charged with blasphemy and persecuted, up to and including execution
for saying “Jesus is Lord.”. HRC 16/18 does nothing to change Shari’ah
nor its implementation in Islamic nations and that is not its
intention. Its stated mission is to prevent and punish “negative
stereotyping”, which is substituted for “defamation of religions”,
which was substituted for “defamation of Islam”. A skunk by any other
name will smell as pungent. The resolution reeks, likewise the
clever words with which it is being disguised & promoted, which are
redolent of feces.
people distort various religious doctrines to justify intolerance,
foment violence, or create strife that serves their narrow political
Islam’s mission is to enrich its founder & his
successors through the professional practice of war and
extortion. I direct doubters & dissenters to a previous blog
post for the disgusting details: Islam’s Mercenary Mission.
Genocidal jihad which terrorizes its victims is an intrinsic sacrament
of Islam, not a radical innovation. I direct doubters &
dissenters to a previous blog post which exposes the disgusting
Wrong With Islam/Muslims? .
must never be a crime and religion must never be used as an excuse to
stifle freedom of expression.
“Faith without works is dead.” and faith without
content is empty. Faith ain’t the problem: doctrines are!
It is what they believe, not the fact that they believe. Faith produces
works; the works of Islam are genocidal conquest, rape, pillage &
extortion; this is why there can be No
Right to Practice Islam.
The objective of HRC 16/18 and its successor
before the GA is to criminalize and punish the publication of the facts
contained in this blog post. The OIC tried to block the publication of
Fitna. They are trying to block the publication of a new book by Geert
Wilders. They demanded that he be persecuted for Fitna.
- Remarks at the Istanbul Process for Combating Intolerance and
Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief
together to protect two fundamental freedoms – the right to practice
one’s religion freely and the right to express one’s opinion without
Hillary just told us that there is a right kill,
enslave, rape, plunder and extort disbelievers. Does she also
believe that there is a right to free expression? What did she say
about International Burn the Qur’an Day? Did she uphold Rev.
Jones’ right to express his disdain for the damnable doctrines of Islam
by burning a Qur’an? No, she condemned the planned event,
labeling it as hate speech and inciting violence, the same terms she
used to condemn the trial & burning of the Qur’an last March.
resolution marks a step forward in creating a safe global environment
for practicing and expressing one’s beliefs
it, we pledge to protect the freedom of religion for all while also
protecting freedom of expression.
There is no step toward religious freedom short of
eradicating Islam. Does Hillary plan to send the Marines to protect
Copts in Egypt? No resolution will protect them! Only
overwhelming force will prevent Muslims from killing members of
Christian minorities in Africa, Arabia & Asia. Nobody
proposes to assemble and apply that force.
Islam can only be eradicated by inducing mass
apostasy. Mass apostasy can only be induced by exposing the Ummah
to the glaring reality of the identity and attributes of Allah, the
character and works of Moe and the horrific crimes against humanity
perpetrated in Allah’s name over the last 14 centuries.
Previous resolutions demanded criminalizing
association of Islam with terrorism, an intrinsic sacrament of which
Moe bragged. Another resolution pending in the General Assembly demands
criminalizing equating Islam with terrorism.
free to practice any religion, to change our religion, or to have none
Open Reliance of the Traveller to Book O, Chapter 8
and start reading through 8.7; there is a link above. Who will go to
Pakistan and enforce the right to convert to Christianity? Will
Hillary or Ban go? Whom will they send; will they return alive
and whole from that mission? You can not change the Qur’an &
sunnah on which O8.1 is based, so, exactly what will you do about it?
are not rights bestowed by any government. They are rights endowed by
our Creator within each of us. And therefore, we have a special
obligation to protect these God-given rights.
Only the U.S. government has an obligation to
protect our rights. Res. 16/18 is part of a campaign to
eviscerate our right to free speech. Hillary’s State department is
acting in contravention of the First Amendment.
the practice of anyone’s faith is a threat to the human rights of all
Muslims believe that they have a divine right and religious
obligation to conquer
the entire world, by intimidation & force, including “casting
terror”. That right and obligation is inseverable; Islam
is all or nothing. Muslims who believe “fight in Allah’s cause, killing
others and being killed. Only
those who participate in jihad are believers. Muslims are commanded
to obey Allah and Moe. Allah commanded them to “fight
the disbelievers nearest you“. Open Sahih Bukhari 52 to see what Moe did, which is to
be emulated. Terrorism is an act of worship, intrinsic to the
practice of Islam; Muslims earn Brownie
Points for any step taken to injure or enrage disbelievers.
Hillary just informed us that preventing Muslims
from engaging in terrorism is an infringement of their human right to
the free practice of religion. Muslims can not fully practice Islam
ability to practice my religious faith freely does not, and indeed
cannot, diminish yours
Your Methodism, Hillary, does not impair the
practice of Islam. A Muslim, practicing his religion can rape and kill
you as an act of worship. Of course, that does not diminish your
rights at all, does it?
can be such a powerful bond, but we also recognize that it can be
misused to create conflict.
Creating conflict and perpetuating war are not
misuses of Islam, they are its mission. Its jihad, stupid! The “original religion” of Islam is jihad and jihad is war against non-Muslims. Allah will curse
Muslims with disgrace if they abandon jihad for trade and
are those who, for reasons actually having little to do with religion,
seek to instill fear or contempt for those of another creed.
That is an obvious sideswipe at “Islamophobes”;
those of us who expose and warn others about the damnable doctrines
& practices of Islam. Hillary implies that critics of Islam
are rousing the rabble to lynch Muslims. If that was true, we
could and should be prosecuted. In fact we are not, but far from
we believe that it is the duty of every government to ensure that
individuals are not subject to violence, discrimination, or
intimidation because of their faith or their lack of faith.
The governments of Egypt, Pakistan and other Islam
dominated nations are active, willing participants in intimidation,
discrimination & persecution of indigenous Christian minorities and
turn a blind eye to Islamic violence.
the same time, as we strive to protect individuals from violence and
discrimination because of their religion or their beliefs, we must also
express the freedom of expression.
Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of
Islam. Muslims earn Brownie Points with each act of
terrorism. 9/11 was an act of worship. The OIC seeks to
criminalize and punish the uttering and publishing of those fatal
facts. The resolution they ran through the GA last year is clear
on that matter. Res 16/18 focuses on incitement to hatred and
violence. According to Ban Ki-Moon, exposing the direct
connection between Islamic scripture, preaching and terrorism is hate
speech and incitement not protected by freedom of expression. If
he had the power, Ban would prohibit the publication of this blog post.
The purpose of Res 16/18 is to con our government into doing it for
how would one know that you were being discriminated against if you
didn’t have the right to freedom of expression?
The right of free expression is essential to
discussion of affairs of state; to political campaigns in
particular. When we perceive a real, proximate and continuing
threat to our personal and national security, we must be free to warn
our fellow citizens. When we are offended by the arrogant
exactions of enemy forces, we must be free to express our outrage and
contempt. The resolution you seek to implement is designed to
eliminate our right to free speech.
the freedom of religion and the freedom of expression are absolutely
bound up together.
My right to warn of the damnable mission, doctrines
and practices of Islam does not, in any way impair anyone’s freedom of
religion. If Muslims have a right to practice Islam, then all of
my rights are impaired. The right to live and the right to
practice Islam can not coexist because Islam is a license to kill; a
declaration of open season in denial of the right to life and
property. I direct doubters & dissenters to Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387.
there are those who have always seen a tension between these two
freedoms, especially when one person’s speech seems to question someone
else’s religious beliefs,
Open Reliance of the Traveller, the Shafi’ite
handbook of fiqh which serves as the main codification of Shari’ah, to
BookO11.10 and learn that Dhimmis can be killed for
anything “impermissible” about Allah, Moe or Islam.
maybe even offends that person’s beliefs.
the truth we have learned, through a lot of trial and error over more
than 235 years in our country, is that we defend our beliefs best by
defending free expression for everyone, and it lowers the temperature.
It creates an environment in which you are free to exercise and to
speak about your religion, whether your neighbor or someone across the
town agrees with you or not.
fact, the appropriate answer to speech that offends is more speech.
Speech that offends: “fight them until”, “fight
those who …until”, “I am commanded to fight”, “I will cast terror”,
“Allah cast terror” so that “some you killed” and others you “made
captive”. I am offended by the Qur’an, hadith, Exegesis & Shari’ah!
I am offended by shouts of “Allahu akbar!”. I am offended
by the accursed abomination 9/11 and every Islamic act of
This blog post, the hundreds of similar posts which
it and those that will follow it are my response to intolerable
evil. My disrespectful demand that Islam be outlawed, Muslims
expelled and excluded from the U.S.A. is my response to intolerable
evil. My curse that I will not vote for any candidate for high
office who does not explicitly condemn Islam is my response to
is hurtful when bigotry pollutes the public sphere,
Informed and reasoned opposition to &
denunciation of Islam, based on the facts contained in its canon of
scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence is not bigotry. The
hallmarks of bigotry are ignorance and a closed mind.
the state does not silence ideas, no matter how disagreeable they might
You just confessed, in context of Res.16/18, that
exposure & condemnation of Islam are disagreeable to you and that
you consider them to be bigotry. You also lied, because the
state, in seeking to implement 16/18, seeks to criminalize & punish
all criticism of Islam. You have, in fact, adopted
the agenda of the enemy: to silence our messages of warning and
we believe that in the end, the best way to treat offensive speech is
by people either ignoring it or combating it with good arguments and
good speech that overwhelms it.
My side has the facts, Hillary. It is not possible
to refute our condemnation of Islam because what we say is supported by
ample evidence found in Islam’s canon. You can not refute the
facts outlined in this blog post. You can lie about them, spew
ad-hominem & Tu-quoque, but you can not prevail with fact and logic
because Islam is intrinsically evil, by design and incapable of
we do speak out and condemn hateful speech.
You condemned Pastor Jones when he sponsored
International Burn the Koran Day. You condemned him when he tried
and executed the Qur’an last March. You and General Petraeus betrayed
us, blaming Jones for Muslim riots stirred up among rabid rabble by
rabid Imams at Jumah Salat. Jones did not incite violence. Jones
did not engage in hate speech. Jones did not violate anyone’s
rights. When you accused Jones of inciting violence, you did, in
fact, incite violence by encouraging Muslims to riot. I call
treason when I see it. You and Obama should be impeached,
convicted of treason and removed from office.
fact, we think it is our duty to do so,
we don’t ban it or criminalize it.
Res. 16/18 is a continuation of the string of
resolutions spawned by the OIC’s Ten year Plan. Scroll down to Art. VI,
item 3 and read about it. Read Ekmeleddin
Ihsanoglu’s speech to the HRC Session 15 and Amb. Akram’s statement
to Session 16, which is transcribed in this blog post. When we read those two
screeds and the Islamophobia Reports, the intent of the
resolution is unmistakably clear.
Fasten your seat belts, this is where the going gets
rough. Put away all fire, choke and spill hazards before you continue
with Resolution 1618, we have clarified these dual objectives.
Malignant malarkey! You clarified nothing, you
obfuscated your intention to criminalize criticism of Islam. That is
kitman as well as al-Taqiyya.
embrace the role that free expression plays in bolstering religious
No sentient person, informed of the damnable
doctrines & practices of Islam, will ever tolerate its existence!
Free expression does not bolster tolerance, it bolsters exposure and
awareness! You spoke of a one sided free expression, limited to false
praise of Islam, not extending to honest criticism.
have agreed to build a culture of understanding and acceptance
Anyone who understands Islam will never accept it!
measures to combat discrimination and violence,
Only Islam and Muslims advocate violence; we
advocate laws to expel and exclude Islam’s fifth column for the purpose
of preventing violence. Do you allow rattlesnakes to reside in your
house? Excluding rattlesnakes is discriminatory.
as education and outreach, and we are working together to achieve those
When a Muslim says “education” he means
indoctrination. Nothing exposed in the links provided in this
blog post is included in instructional materials used in our
educational system, with the exception of some doctoral programs at
large universities. Outreach translates to
one thing if people are just disagreeing. That is fair game. That’s
They say that “only Allah has the right to be
worshiped” and that I must convert or be killed. I say that I have a
right to worship or not as I blessed well see fit, without being
intimidated or coerced. They assert a duty to attack us, I assert
a right to effective national defense. They say I must be silent, I say
that I have an absolute right to expose their evil doctrines &
if it results in sectarian clashes,
Sunni & Shi’ia are rivals for power. Power
corrupts. Nothing can stop them form internecine conflict.
it results in the destruction or the defacement or the vandalization of
In Africa, Arabia, & Asia, Muslims burn down
churches, with Christians in them. That results from what is
preached in their local mosques, not what we write in our blogs.
We do not incite vandalism, a few idiots driven over the edge by
frustration act on their own free will, without anyone telling them to.
it even results in imprisonment or death,
The trial and execution of a Qur’an in Florida did
not result in death. Those deaths and property damage resulted from the
rabid preaching at Jumah Salat, not anything anyone said or did over
government must held those – hold those who are responsible accountable.
I’d like to see how you are going to hold Allah
& Moe responsible for riots & murders inspired by the Qur’an
& Sunnah. Allah is an impotent idol and Moe has been dead
since Do you think you can go to Egypt & Pakistan to
arrest, try and incarcerate the rabid Imams who rouse the rabble to
riot? I’d like to see you try it.
There is a difference between shouting fire in a
crowded theater where there is no fire or rousing a lynch mob and
burning a Qur’an. Exposing the damnable doctrines of Islam in a
blog post does not kill anyone or destroy any property. Property
is destroyed and people are killed by Muslims engaged in an act of
worship: terrorism. They don’t get their incitement from us, they
get it from Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis &
jurisprudence and from their Imams.
I have to say we have one difficulty in understanding all of the
problems that we see around the world, and that is
because religion is so personal and because it is something that we
highly value in ourselves,
No, it ain’t and anybody smarter than a Moron can
see it after a little investigation. Ignorant & indolent Morons
like you project the western concept of religion onto Islam, which it
does not fit. We view religion as a beneficent & anodyne
agency of theology & interpersonal relationships. Religions
are our source of much of our morality & ethics.
Islam is presented and accepted by Muslims as the
absolute rule of Allah, which must be obeyed in all times, at all
places. It governs every facet of human life from conception through
burial. It dictates how they eat, how they defecate and how they
wipe their butts. It also imposes upon them a demonic mandate to
conquer and subjugate the entire world. Go to Amazon.com and get
a copy of Reliance of the Traveller or Volume II of hedaya and start
reading. You can learn much from the table of contents.
Islam is not a benign, anodyne & benevolent
theology, it is a continuing criminal enterprise; a war crime against
humanity motivated by filthy lucre: “The Spoils of War“.
After reading the first verse, skip ahead to 41, then 60 & 67. Turn next to 33:26-27 and 48:15-20. Turn next to Sahih Muslim 19.4327, Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220, & 4.52.267. If, after checking those
references, you can not correctly answer the following review
questions, its time to consider suicide to protect the gene pool.
- To whom do the spoils belong?
- Who gets the top 20%?
- What was Moe’s motivation?
- What is Allah’s motivation?
[Hint: it ain't getting Moe into his celestial bordello.]
- What was the net effect of casting terror?
- What did Allah promise Muslims?
- What is the legal status of taking spoils?
- What did Allah give Moe?
- How did Muslims invest the treasures of the Persian &
strikes us as troubling that people are not confident in their
the point where they do not fear speech that raises questions about
Muslims are hypersensitive because their faith is
false. The ruling class is in the know, it is likely that many of
the clerical class are true believers. They do not want the Ummah to
Christians have a long chain of fulfilled Jewish
prophecies to base their faith on. Muslims have only Moe’s word.
Islam begins and ends with Moe, who co-opted Jewish Prophets in hopes
of deceiving the local Jews. The trick did not work; the Jews
laughed him to scorn, recognizing the fraud.
Go to a hadith search engine such as Islamic
Network and search Sahih Bukhari for these terms, without the
quotes: “was revealed”, “inspiration” and “your wishes and desires”.
one of us who is a religious person knows that there are some who may
not support or approve of our religion.
- But is our religion so weak that
statements of disapproval will cause us to lose our faiths?
Moe was extremely sensitive to criticism, so much so
that he ordered his companions to kill several critics. One clear
example is in the hadith where we can easily find it, others
are buried in The Life of
Muhammad and Tabari’s
Tahrik. Answering Islam
has several of the relevant accounts.
would be most unfortunate. In fact, what we have found, in study after
study, is that the United States is one of the most religious countries
in the world. And yet anybody can believe anything and go anywhere.
so there is no contradiction between having strong religious beliefs
and having the freedom to exercise them and to speak about them and to
even have good debates with others.
Res. 16/18 puts some emphasis on inter-religious
dialog, assuming that it will deaden our awareness of the existential
conflict between Islam and Christianity. When Pope Benedict XVI
lectured at Regensburg, Muslims raised hell and a large number of the
Ulema wrote a missive entitled A Common Word Between Us and You. in which they
called for dialog to find “common ground”. The central concept of
the missive is drawn from Surah Al Imran 3:64.
That ayeh ends with this sentence: “Bear witness that we are Muslims”;
those are fighting words. Read the context through #112.
Those threatening words were used in Moe’s extortion letter to Heraclius.
To see how Moe conducted dialog with Christians
(demanding that they curse themselves) turn to this topic in Tafsir Ibn
Kathir: The Challenge to the Mubahalah.
the fact is that no matter how
strongly each of us believes, none of us has the benefit of knowing all
the truth that God holds in his hands.
Nobody knows for certain, but Islam asserts a claim
of certainty that it alone has a monopoly on truth and that our
religion is in error.
therefore, we are doing the
best we can here on
earth to reflect and to give honor to our creator in a way that is
manifest in our religious values. Because truly, at the root of every major religion,
is a connection with the divinity,
The root of Islam is war, not a connection with
divinity. Search the hadith for “inspiration”, you will discover
how Moe got his “revelations”: in epileptic seizures. In the first
instance, he thought that he had wrestled with the devil but his wife
convinced him that he had encountered an angel. Take another good
long look at 8:67;’
that is some connection with “divinity”.
I know that some in my country
and elsewhere have criticized this meeting and our work with
all of you.
I want to make clear that I am
proud of this work, and I am proud to be working with every one
of you. And I believe that this
work is an affirmation of America’s values, but equally
important an affirmation of
Since when is anal osculation either an American or
universal value? Lifting Satan’s tail & inserting
tongue solves nothing. Abandoning our precious, hard won right to
speak and write the truth is not an American value. American
values include life, liberty, property, pursuit of happiness and
defeating our enemies. Yielding liberty to our enemies is the polar
opposite of American values.
we nor – no country
individually has a monopoly on the truth, and we will do better
when we live in peace with each other,
In 1789 we were willing to live in peace with the
entire world but the Barbary pirates were not willing to live in peace
with us. They attacked our shipping and demanded tribute, which nearly
bankrupted the young nation. When asked by what right they attacked us,
the Algerian Ambassador replied
in terms which parallel the reply of Umar’s field commander to the
Persians in Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386. Peace
will only be possible after Islam is eliminated because Islam is permanent
we live with respect and
humility, and listen to each other. And it is important that we
recognize what we accomplished
when this resolution ended 10 years of divisive debate where people
were not listening to each other anymore.
It is abundantly clear from the recent statements of
Akram & ishanoglu, as well as the Islamophobia Reports, that
the change is purely rhetorical, a semantic game at which our side
we are. We’re talking. We have
to get past the idea that we can suppress religious minorities,
This is a terrible place to use the royal we . It is
Islam, not America that suppresses indigenous religious
minorities. There is an external ‘religious’ minority which has
infiltrated a fifth column into America with moles in high places in
defense, intelligence and security agencies. We need to expel and
exclude them. You condemn the only recourse we have a priori.
we can restrict
When you create a legal construct which ties what we
utter and publish with the completely unrelated actions of unrelated
people on other continents, completely beyond our control, assigning
blame to us for what they do on their own accord, then you are
attempting to restrict free speech by forcing self-censorship.
You are, in effect, erecting a heckler’s veto and abandoning the First
we are smart enough
that we can substitute our judgment for God’s and determine who is or
is not blaspheming.
Open Reliance of the Traveller to O8.0 and start reading, continuing through O8.7;
get a clue!
by bringing countries from around the world here,
are affirming our common
- and our common commitment to defend
and promote fundamental rights.
I doubt that any falser words were ever uttered in
the history of mankind. We are committed to defend and promote
fundamental rights, Muslims are not; Muslims are committed to the
abrogation of our rights. Islam denies the sanctity of our blood
and property, declaring that we have no rights until we become Muslims.
Those denials are contained in Moe’s declaration quoted in Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387. Projecting our own values
onto the enemy is a suicidal blunder.
can think others are wrong, but we don’t feel so insecure and so
fearful of their wrong views that we try to suppress them, imprison
them, or even kill them.
Ten years ago, 19 Muslims hijacked four passenger
aircraft and flew three of them into occupied office structures.
They shouted “Allahu akbar!” while slitting the throats of the flight
crews. Subsequently, other Muslims, acting in the name of Allah, bombed
subways in Madrid and London and seized a school in Beslan. Get a
clue! In the last 1400 years, 270*106 innocent people lost their
lives to Islam. If we do not eradicate Islam, either ideologically or militarily, they will out breed
& out last us and civilization will be destroyed.