Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

UN Reaffirms that: terrorism cannot and should not be associated with Islam


A/68/L.50

The United Nations Global Counter Terrorism  Strategy Review, submitted by the President of the General Assembly, continues the obnoxious spew of camel excrement.

Reaffirming that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any
religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group,

Distilled to its essence, the assertion is:

‘terrorism cannot  be associated with Islam’

Only an ignorant Moron or a traitor to the human race will make that obviously false assertion.   Khalid Sheikh Mohammad [May the government execute him and God burn him!] wrote in his confession that the Accursed Abomination was an act of worship and that it was their duty to terrorize us on account of our disbelief.

Terrorism

Terrorism is intended to soften up Islam’s victims, to render them incapable of mounting an effective resistance.  Can you get a God blessed clue?

3:111. They will do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if they fight against you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped.

3:112. Indignity is put over them wherever they may be, except when under a covenant (of protection) from Allâh, and from men; they have drawn on themselves the Wrath of Allâh, and destruction is put over them. This is because they disbelieved in the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh and killed the Prophets without right. This is because they disobeyed (Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh’s disobedience, crimes and sins).

Why will the Jews and Christians do the Muslims no harm defensively or in retaliation?  Because Allah will terrorize them.

3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers

 

Details

This is not a new topic, the UN passes resolutions bearing similar statements every year and other liars echo the same lie. Rather than re-invent the wheel, I am embedding a previous blog post containing the most vital evidence to disprove the falsity of the UN’s assertion.

View this document on Scribd

June 13, 2014 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Terror Threat, United Nations | , , | Leave a comment

Innocence of Muslims Update: OIC Demands Blasphemy Law


Pakistan
addressed the General Assembly on behalf of the OIC.  They demand
international  imposition of Islamic blasphemy law. It is
necessary to highlight their AssWholliness
& hypocrisy; that is the mission of this blog post.  They are
bitching about Innocence of Musalims, Charlie Hebdo’s outrageous
cartoons and Qur’an burning.  Carefully examine the video and
answer these questions:

  1. What does the video say about Muhammad and the cult he founded?
  2. Is it true or false?
  3. Where is the hate they are bitching about?
  4. Where is the incitement they are bitching about?

http://www.eyeontheun.org/assets/attachments/documents/10570item_9_Pakistan_on_behalf_of_OIC.pdf

STATEMENT BY PAKISTAN ON BEHALF OF THE
OIC IN THE GENERAL

DEBATE UNDER AGENDA ITEM 9

Madam President,

I have the honour to make this statement on behalf of the OIC,

The OIC Group unequivocally condemns the recent production of a film in
the

United States called “The Innocence of Muslims” which tries to defame Islam and the

personality of the Holy Prophet Muhammad
(peace be upon Him). This film is a blatant

attempt to provoke religious
hatred
, discrimination
and intolerance
that has led to unfortunate

loss of life and damage to property. In this context, we also strongly
condemn the violence

that resulted in the deaths of a number of people including a US
diplomat.

We note that the Secretary
General of the United Nations, The High


Commissioner for Human Rights
and the President of the United States
have also expressed

their opposition to the film.

Incidents like this clearly demonstrate the urgent
need on the part of States to

introduce adequate protection against acts of hate crimes, hate speech,
discrimination,


intimidation and coercion
resulting from defamation and negative stereotyping of religions,


and incitement to religious
hatred, as well denigration of venerated personalities.

Over the past months, there have been a number of
examples of acts of

incitement to hatred.
These include despicable incidents involving the burning of the Holy

Quran, and the publication of
defamatory cartoons
. OIC countries have repeatedly called on

the Governments concerned to take action to avert these offensive actions but nothing
has

been done on the excuse that such action would be a violation of the freedom of expression.

The OIC underlines that the situation created by the malicious act affirms once
more the

urgency for all States to fully uphold their obligations under
international law”, in particular

articles 19 and 20 olf ICCPR and article 4 of the International

Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination

We disagree. These are not exercises in freedom of expression but deliberate  attempts


to discriminate, defame,
denigrate and vilify Muslims and their beliefs.
Such acts

constitute flagrant incitement
to violence and are therefore in contravention of ICCPR


Articles 19 and 20. It
is therefore abundantly clear that there exists an urgent need to
establish

an internationally acceptable
threshold between freedom of expression and incitement to


violence and hatred.

The OIC has
never advocated any prohibitions on freedom of expression
.
Our

emphasis has been on the need to examine the consequences of unchecked,
unbridled and

irresponsible statements and
actions
made by certain groups and individuals that deliberately

instigate and incite violence
on the basis of religion or belief.
This can include situations

involving religious minorities
or situations in which minorities react violently
either in their

home societies or in societies where their co-religionists are in a
majority.

None of.this is completely uncharted territory. For
instance, we are all aware of

the fact that laws exist in Europe and other countries which impose curbs on anti-Semetic

speech, holocaust denial or
racial slurs
. We need to acknowledge, once and for all, that

Islamophobia in
particular and discrimination on the basis of religion and belief are

contemporary forms of racism
and must be dealt with as such. Not to do so would be a
clear

example of double standards. Islamophobia has to be
treated in law and practice equal to the


treatment given to
anti-Semitism, especially in the legislations. -

We recall the general comment 11 of the Human Rights
Committee and

general comment of the Committee on Elimination of Racial
Discrimination which confirm.

that restricting the freedom of expression on issues relating to racial
discrimination applies

. also for incitement to religious hatred.

The OIC’s resolution on “Combating Intolerance,
Negative Stereotyping And

Stigmatization of; and Discrimination, Incitement to Violence, and
Violence against Persons

based on Religion or Belief” adopted by consensus at the 16th
session of the Human Rights

Council on 24 March 2011, was a concrete attempt: to address this very.
concern by bringing

all the key players on board. The consensus resolution was the -result
of a long and often,

difficult negotiation process.

The OIC welcomes the joint statement by the OIC
Secretary general, Arab

League Secretary general, African Union Commissioner for Peace and
Security and European

Union High Representative for foreign and Security policy in which they
shared the profound

respect for all religion and refuse to, allow religion to be used to
fuel provocation,

confrontation and extremism. They reiterated their strong commitment to
take further

measures and to work for an international consensus on tolerance and full respect of
religion
,       <<<

including on the basis of UN Human rights Council resolution 16/18.

At the heart of the resolution are a series of
practical steps to be taken by states

to combat the ever increasing instances of intolerance, negative stereo-typing,
stigmatization


and discrimination and violence
all over the world. This core issue has been approached in a

manner that is acceptable to
all
so that all stake-holders are bound by the commitments

contained in the text. The OIC believes that there is an urgent need to
take concrete steps

towards the implementation of the plan action contained in the
resolution to avoid the

occurrence of such condemnable
incidents in the future
. If this is not done, there is a very real

chance of a
breakdown of the delicate consensus on this issue as reflected in the
resolution


which would be
unfortunate for all of us.

The OIC remains ready to work with its international
partners at the Human

Rights Council in Geneva, the UN General Assembly in New York to
address and resolve

these critical issues in order to better protect and promote
human rights as well as peace and .


security within our
respective societies.

We also call upon the High Commissioner and her
Office to assist this . important effort.

I thank you.

 

tries to defame

If you were trying to defame someone with a video,
would you derive its dialogue from his original hagiographic biography
and the most authentic oral traditions from his companions?  In
Western legal tradition, defamation involves malicious falsehood.
Exactly what is false about the video’s depiction of Moe?

deliberate provocation

What does the video have to do with religious
hatred, discrimination and intolerance?  It illustrated the hatred
of Muslims who, when they can do it with impunity, murder Christians
and destroy their property.  What is provocative about that? Must
the news media be prevented from reporting on religiously motivated
violence in Africa. Arabia and Asia because it might be
provocative?  What was Moe’s attitude toward infidels? Was it
accurately depicted in the video? What is provocative about that?

unfortunate loss of life

How did the video lead to loss of life? How many of
the rioters saw the video? The riots were deliberately stirred up by
mass media and rabid rants in the mosques. Fortune had nothing to do
with murder and destruction, they are intended effects of the damnable
doctrines of Islam.

What did Christians destroy and whom did they kill
over “Piss Christ” and “The Holy Virgin Mary”?  What is the
difference between Christians and Muslims or their respective doctrines
that explains the widely divergent reactions to disturbing
images?  What did Jesus do?  What did Moe do?  Whom do
Muslims emulate?  Do the murders of Kab Ashraf, Asma Bint Marwan
and Um Qirfa ring a bell?

appeal to authority

The listed authority figures are full of fecal
matter so that it comes out their mouths, which I pointed out in
several blog posts. It ain’t who you know, it is what you know. I know
that the conceptual content of the video is true according to Islam’s
canon.  I know that there is no rational basis for condemning the
video.  I know that the listed authority figures are scared
witless of Islam and seek to appease Muslims.  I do not accept
them as an argument for censorship.

hate crimes, hate speech…

Hate crimes and hate speech do not flow from
defamation or negative stereotyping, they flow from hate. The riots in
Egypt and murders in Bengazi are the fruit of wala wal bara:
“love and hate for the sake of Allah”. Those are hate crimes, for which
the criminals constantly seek pretexts. That is low intensity warfare,
a doctrine borrowed from the Soviets and their ‘non aligned’ clients.

Moe hated Jews and Christians because they perceived
the fraudulent nature of the cult he contrived to ensnare them with
perverted and distorted stories from their scriptures and apocryphal
books. The first surah of the Qur’an reminds Allah why he should want
to burn us. Muslims recite it 17 times each day.  The second surah
says that we are cursed by Allah, angels and men.  The third tells
Muslims that they are the best of peoples raised up for mankind as they
drag us to Islam in chains.  It also tells Muslims that if they
attack us, we will do them no harm.

defamation

It ain’t defamatory unless it is false and
malicious.  Did the video defame Moe when it reported that he
thought he was demon possessed and tried to kill himself?  Before
answering, perhaps you should refer to the first book in Sahih Bukhari
and Ibn Sa’d’s  hadith collection.  Did the video defame Moe
when it depicted him as a pedophile?  Perhaps you should go to
your favorite hadith search engine and look up “six years old” before
answering that. Muttawir ahadith testify to Aisha’s age at marriage and
consummation, with one hadith giving her age as seven.

Did the video defame Moe when it depicted him as a
lecher?  Did he really divert Hafsa from the bedroom on her night
in order to tryst with her slave girl?  Dig into Volume 9 of the
Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, page 88 if memory
serves.   And the murder of Kinana & rape of his widow,
Safiya? True or false?  Look it up in Guillaume’s The Life of
Muhammad and Tabari’, if memory serves, its in Vol. 8.  And the
talking donkey?  Ishaq reveals that it was paid in tribute by an
Egyptian ruler, along with the slave girl and her sister.  The
part about the interview with the donkey is in the Encyclopedia of
Canonical Hadith.

And the command to wage war, killing the men and
enslaving their widows and orphans, is that true? If you read the
Qur’an, surahs 8, 9 & 33, you know the answer.

stereotyping

The video does not say anything about Muslims other
than Moe and his companions who are long since dead.  How does it
stereotype Muslims?  Moe defined and exemplified Islam.  33:21 tells Muslims if they want to meet Allah in
a positive way, they had better emulate Moe.  3:32
tells them to Obey Allah & Moe.  What Moe was, pious believers
are to the extent that they know his sunnah and are able to emulate
it.

If Moe channeled Satan instead of God, which he did,
then in stead of worshiping God, Muslims worship his adversary.
If Moe revealed situational scripture, which he did, then Muslims
follow a fraud: a false prophet.    When we expose the
truth about Allah & Moe, we expose Muslims as demon’s slaves and
members of a crime syndicate.

incitement to religious hatred

How does the video incite religious hatred?
And what is the foul if it did?  Should not an impious fraud which
has murdered millions and enslaves billions be hated?  Exposing
evil is not incitement.  Doing evil is incitement. The terrorism,
riots & murders,. not cartoons, books & videos cause us to hate
Islam.

denigration

Moe was venal, not venerable, Guillaume’s The
Life of Muhammad
and The Sealed Nectar
display the true character and works of Moe; should they be banned for
denigration of a venerable personality?

acts of incitement

Uttering & publishing Innocence of Muslims
is not an act of incitement, it is an act of education:: showing
viewers a fair sample what Moe was and what he did.  The Qur’an is
an insulting incitement; Allah told Moe to recite it in a low voice to
avoid stirring up the pagans.

(And offer your Salah neither aloud nor in a low voice,) Ibn `Abbas
said: “When he prayed with his Companions, he would recite Qur’an
loudly, and when the idolators heard that, they insulted the Qur’an,
and the One Who had revealed it and the one who had brought it. So
Allah said to His Prophet

What was Moe doing when he recited these ayat? How
does recitation of these verses and the rest of the 164
violent verses
comport with ICCPR
19 & 20 CPPCG
3 and ICERD
4?

1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way

1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned
Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as
the Christians). 

3:85. And whoever
seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never
be accepted
of
him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.

3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism,
and real followers of Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal
ways, etc.)] are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind;
you enjoin
Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and
forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has
forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the
Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for
them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are
Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s
Command).

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.” means, the best of
peoples for the people, as you bring them
with chains on their necks
till they embrace Islam
.

3:111. They will do you no
harm, barring a trifling annoyance
; and if they fight against
you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped.

3:112. Indignity is put over
them wherever they may be
, except when under a covenant (of
protection) from Allâh, and from men; they have drawn on themselves the
Wrath of Allâh, and destruction
is put over them
. This is because they disbelieved in
the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.)
of Allâh and killed the Prophets without right. This is because they
disobeyed (Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh’s
disobedience, crimes and sins).

8:39. And fight them until
there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping
others besides Allâh) and the religion
(worship) will all be for Allâh Alone
[in the whole of the world
]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then
certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet
that he should have prisoners of war
(and free them with ransom)
until he had
made a great slaughter
(among his
enemies) in the land. You
desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the
captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is
All-Mighty, All-Wise.

9:29. Fight
against
those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among the people of the Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until
they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves
subdued.

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that
when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd)
you cling heavily to the earth?
Are you pleased with the life of
this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of
the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.

9:39. If
you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment

and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all,
and Allâh is Able to do all things.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the
believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs
shall be the Paradise. They fight in
Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed
. It is a
promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the
Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than
Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is
the supreme success .

9:120. It was not
becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins
of the
neighbourhood to remain behind
Allâh’s Messenger
(Muhammad  when fighting in Allâh’s Cause)
and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer their own lives to his
life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor
hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any
step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an
enemy
but is written to their
credit as a deed of righteousness
. Surely, Allâh wastes not the
reward of the Muhsinûn

9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who
are close to you,
and let them find harshness in you, and know
that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see
V.2:2).

61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that
will save you from a painful torment.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ),
and that
you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and
your lives
, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive
you your sins, and admit you into Gardens
under which rivers
flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn ­ Eternity [‘Adn (Edn)
Paradise], that is indeed the great success.

offensive actions

Publishing videos, cartoons and books along with
burning the Qur’an are symbolic actions which do no objective
harm.  Burning churches, murdering Christians, bombing mass
transit and flying hijacked aircraft into office buildings are
offensive actions which incite us to utter and publish the truth about
Islam.

freedom of expression.

Amendment I

Congress
shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging
the freedom of speech, or of the press
; or the right of
the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a
redress of grievances.

 

George Washington:

If the freedom of speech is taken away
then dumb and silent we may be
led, like sheep to the slaughter.

Since Islam declared and is prosecuting war upon us
it is necessary that we be able to discuss it with honesty, accuracy
and clarity.  The War College and West Point need to be free to
give full and honest instruction in the doctrines and laws of Islam in
the training of our officer corps.  Censorship and political
correctness must be rolled back and stamped out!

Imposition of Islamic blasphemy law would make
Thomas Jefferson a criminal for uttering & publishing his report to
Congress.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

The
ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the
Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all
nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that
it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could
be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and
that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure
to go to heaven.

malicious act

Publishing Innocence of Muslims
is not a malicious act, it simply makes available, for those who wish
to view it, an accurate depiction of a segment of the Life of
Moe.  Rousing the rabble to attack our Embassy & Consulate and
murder our Ambassador and staff were malicious acts.

Enforcement of human rights covenants

is indeed an urgent matter.  The International
Criminal Court must open a case condemning Islam for incitement to war,
racial supremacism and incitement to genocide.  Because Islam
perpetrated the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides and seeks to
commit genocide against Jews, it must be condemned and proscribed by
law.

OIC never advocated

prohibition of free expression; never?  You demanded that Holland
block release of Fitna and
Wilders’ book. You demanded that Denmark prosecute the publisher of the
Motoons.
You promoted the passage of UN resolutions condemning and demanding the
criminalization of criticism of Islam and you demand persecution of the
creator of Innocence
of Muslims
. But you never advocated abridgment of the right of
free speech: Camelshit!

consequences

Cartoons, videos, books and statements do not have
consequences. The barbarian behavior of Muslim mobs is a consequence of
the rabid ranting of Imams at Jumah Salat, not anything we do.
Muslims exploit anything we say or do as a pretext for barbarism but
pretext is not causation, it is rationalization. Ladies and
gentlemen:  Get a God blessed clue for Chrissake!!! I present for
your edification a sentence of Shari’ah from Hedaya, the code of the
Hanifi school of fiqh.

The destruction of the sword  is
incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as
appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
generally received this effect. [
http://www.archive.org/stream/hedaysorguide00hamigoog#page/n154/mode/1up]

minorities react violently

Did Copts burn mosques when Piss Christ and The Holy Virgin Mary
were put on display as ‘art’?  When  Muslims ‘react
violently’, they exemplify the damnable doctrines of Islam and their
own AssWholliness, which alone are the
causes of their violence.

Curbs

on antisemitism & holocaust denial exemplify European stateism, the
USA does not emulate them because of our First Amendment. We allow free
and open debate, secure in the belief that truth will triumph in a
level venue.  Those restrictions on European free speech  do
not serve as a positive model for imposition of Islam’s blaspemy
law.  Islam seeks to prohibit all criticism of Allah, Moe and
their damned war cult because they are indefensible; our factual
evidence and logic can not be refuted. Islam can not prevail in free
debate, so it must silence all critics by force just as Moe
commissioned the assassinations of his critics.

racism

What race is Islam?  Its founder and first
adherents were Arabs but it has conquered and forcibly converted
Africans, Asians and Caucasians.  The existence of both Black and
White Muslims  and the ability to become Muslim without changing
one’s skin pigment or physiognomy serve to devastate the accusation of
racism in thinking minds.  Hurling that epithet is the  last
refuge of  scurrilous politicians and AssWholes.

Islamophobia

Phobia is an irrational fear. After the Accursed
Abomination 11 years ago, we are fully aware of the fact that Islam is
a worthy object of fear, loathing and execration, death & damnation
be upon it! Islam inculcates hatred and incites genocidal
violence.  Hatred of Islam is well founded and rational, not
irrational.

legislation

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/defamation-of-religions-background-info/
contains links to the documents you should read to get a good grip on
the issue of the legislation demanded by the OIC.

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2011/12/21/big-lie-un-drops-call-to-outlaw-defamation-of-religions/
tackles the issue of Res 16/18 in detail.

http://snooper.wordpress.com/2012/09/20/ad-hoc-cmte-war-on-free-speech/

http://snooper.wordpress.com/2010/03/20/ad-hoc-committee-new-resolutions/
This pair of blog posts will acquaint you with a parallel process
running below the radar of mass media.  The Ad Hoc Committee on
Elaboration of Complementary Standards meets for ten days each spring
and fall for the purpose of coding Islam’s blasphemy laws into a
binding protocol to ICERD.  If they succeed and the President
signs the damn thing, kiss the First Amendment  goodbye
forever.  The Iranian proposal and the non paper paper are
essential to understanding what they propose to do.

tolerance & respect

Tolerance is a two way street. Islam is intolerant.
Go back and re-read 3:85 and the context of 3:110. That is
intolerance, not tolerance.  How in Hell can anyone who declares
perpetual war against Jews & Christians
lecture us about
tolerance?  Only by supreme AssWholliness!

Respect must be earned; Islam has not earned it and
is no more respectable than it is tolerable.  I can not tolerate
propagation of the idea that my blood and property are not sacred; that I have
no human rights and its open season.  I can not tolerate that
which declares and war against me.

I can not respect a G’d’d demon who demands genocide
as the price of admission to his Celestial Bordello. I can not respect a pederast
who claimed divine sanction for his marriage to his
best friend’s six year old daughter.  I can not respect a
false prophet who attributed to his idol what his idol did not say, asserting divine sanction for his sexual proclivities.

promote peace and security

The highlighted clause in this sentence fragment is
a thinly veiled threat:  threatening violence if we do not submit
to censorship. By God, I will never submit!!!

…to
address and resolve these critical issues in order to better protect and promote
human rights as well as peace and .


security within our
respective societies.

Peace and
security can only be promoted by making Islam extinct.

September 28, 2012 Posted by | Ahadith, GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Netanyahu @UN: PC Poison


http://gadebate.un.org/67/israel

http://www.policymic.com/articles/15409/netanyahu-speech-at-un-general-assembly-full-transcript-and-video

We won’t solve our conflict with libelous speeches at the UN. That’s not
the way to solve it. We won’t solve our conflict with unilateral
declarations of statehood.

We
have to sit together, negotiate together, and reach a mutual
compromise, in which a demilitarized Palestinian state recognizes the
one and only Jewish State.

Israel
wants to see a Middle East of progress and peace. We want to see the
three great religions that sprang forth from our region – Judaism,
Christianity and Islam – coexist in peace and in mutual respect.

Yet
the medieval forces of radical Islam, whom you just saw storming the
American embassies throughout the Middle East, they oppose this.

They
seek supremacy over all Muslims. They are bent on world conquest. They
want to destroy Israel, Europe, America. They want to extinguish
freedom. They want to end the modern world.

Militant
Islam has many branches – from the rulers of Iran with their
Revolutionary Guards to Al Qaeda terrorists to the radical cells
lurking in every part of the globe.

But
despite their differences, they are all rooted in the same bitter soil
of intolerance. That intolerance is directed first at their fellow
Muslims, and then to Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, secular
people, anyone who doesn’t submit to their unforgiving creed.

They
want to drag humanity back to an age of unquestioning dogma and
unrelenting conflict.

our conflict

It is not your conflict, it is Islam’s. Moe hated
Jews because, after he fabricated his new cult to appeal to them, they
recognized his fraud and rejected it.  Moe went to them and asserted ownership of the world and that he would
expel them from the Hijaz if they did not convert to Islam.  Moe
expressed a preference for conquering the Levant before Yemen,
saying that Allah had, on his account, taken special charge of the
people of Syria.  Umar’s conquest of the Levant was completed in
638.

won’t be solved

The conflict is existential: it can only be ended by
extinction.  Sahih Bukhari 4.52.177 & Sahih Muslim 41.6985 inform us that Islam intends
to solve it by genocide.  Ibn Kathir’s exegesis of 7:167
informs us that Jesus Christ will lead the Muslims in the final
genocide of Jews.  Who might Allah send to continually humiliate
and torment the Jews until the last day?

Muslims can never tolerate the existence of Israel
because it is the ultimate blasphemy: it proves Allah to be an impotent
idol whose promise is void.  Allah promised Muslims, in 13:41, that Allah would irreversibly give the land
to them; that none could recover it.  Allah promised the Muslims first a ten to one, then a two to one kill ratio,
yet they lost four wars in which they intended to exterminate
you.

Peace

Peace is the absence of Muslims:  cause them to
cease believing in Allah, his imperativethreat & promise, or usher them into Hell.  There are
no other options.

Palestine

Israel is Palestine, Jews are Palestinians.
Palestine is Israel, Palestinians are Jews. Gaza, Judea & Samaria
are occupied by Muslim interlopers who must be expelled. Jerusalem has
not been the capital of any nation other than the Jews.  No nation
of Palestine ever existed.  There are enough Muslim nations, we
don’t need any more anywhere.

July
11, ’02, Joseph Farah published  in World Net Daily,
a revelation of truth difficult for many to accept. He lifted
the
wool, exposing the fraud perpetrated by the propagandists.
One
quote in that article stands out above the rest for  the
clarity
of its revelation.

The
Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state
is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel
for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between
Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and
tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian
people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the
existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism.
…[
Zahir Muhsein, P.L.O. Executive Cmte.]

‘Three great religions’

Two, AssWhole.
No decent person calls Islam a religion, much less great! Such terms
are the exclusive domain of damned fools and liars. What religion executes apostates? What religion ordains offensive conquest?  If Islam were a
religion, how would conquering half of the known world make confer
greatness on a religion?

coexist

How in the G’d’d Hell does any fool hope to coexist
with an ideology dedicated to his extermination?

respect

Who respects those who “earned Allah’s wrath“, sons of monkeys & swines; the worst of living creatures? Who can respect those
who describe Jews that way?

radical
Islam

Malignant malarkey!!!! “Its Islam, stupid!”
Pull your head out of your anus long enough to read the Qur’an , Hadith: Sahih Bukhari: Jihad, Kumus & Expedition and  Shari’ah: Reliance of the Traveller O9 & Hedaya Vol. II, Book IX, Chapter 1. Normative
Islam is what Moe preached and practiced, nothing else. <META
NAME=”DESCRIPTION” CONTENT=”Your keyword rich marketing sales-pitch
meta description goes here”>

<META NAME=”KEYWORDS” CONTENT=”your keywords,go here,separated by a
comma,but not a space”> <META NAME=”DESCRIPTION” CONTENT=”Your
keyword rich marketing sales-pitch meta description goes here”>

<META NAME=”KEYWORDS” CONTENT=”your keywords,go here,separated by a
comma,but not a space”>

September 27, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Islamic Radicalism?, Israel, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ahmadinejad @ UN Spew of Feces


The screed is long, 11 pages and I am unable to maintain its format, so I
will reproduce only the most important turds which I will attack with
facts and logic.  A link to the pdf file containing the spew of
feces is immediately below.  I expected that Ahmadinejad would
spew some turd about
Innocence of Muslims

and demand imposition of blasphemy laws. If he did, I am blind to it.
He did repeat the usual boiler plate about the evils of Capitalism and
secular governments, selling Islam as the cure for the world’s
ills.  He also repeated the boiler plate of mythical UN
reform.  If you want to waste your time reading that feces, follow
the link.

Address by

H.E. Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

President of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Before the

67th Session of the United Nations General Assembly

New York

26 September 2012

 

In the Name
of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful

 

In the name of Allah

The arrogant AssWhole thinks he is the caliph;
Allah’s spokesman. If he speaks for anyone, it is Satan.

Hasten the Emergence

Oh, God, Hasten the Emergence of Your Chosen Beloved, Grant Him Good

Health and Victory, Make us His Best Companions, and all those who
attest to His

Rightfulness.

The arrogant AssWhole
opened his spew of feces with a prayer to the chief demon, supplicating
for the return of the Mahdi who fell down a well centuries ago and
ain’t coming back.  Islamic eschatology depicts the Mahdi as
returning just prior to the end of the world. He will perform the role
of barbarian warlord in the final conquest of the world.  I
disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to Sunan Abu Dawud 36.4266 & Sahih Muslim 41.6681  read  each book to
its end and obtain a clue.

Had
extremism or terrorism not been used to secure political goals,

terrorism

Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam; used
by Moe to gain victory. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters
& deniers to Islam’s canon to obtain a clue:  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
33:26,27,
47:4,49:15,
59:2,13,
61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  The Arrogant AssWhole
is blaming Shrub for it, accusing him of political exploitation.

-I do not believe that Muslims,
Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists
, and

others have any problems, or
are hostile against each other
. They get along together

comfortably and live together in an atmosphere of peace and amity. They
are all

devoted to the cause of justice, purity and love.

can’t we all get along ?

The fact is that Islam is in a permanent state of
war against the rest of the human race, wheresoever dispersed over the
face of the earth.  The war is waged on Islam’s initiative,
without provocation, as as a source of income and wealth.  I
disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to Islam’s
canon to obtain a  clue.

The
order
that is rooted in the anti-human thoughts of slavery
and the old and

new colonialism are responsible for poverty, corruption, ignorance,
oppression and

discrimination in every corner of the world.

Which order?

Reliance of the Traveller: O9.13  When a child or a woman is taken
captive, they become slaves by
the fact of capture
, and the woman’s previous marriage is
immediately annulled.

God Almighty has promised us a man of kindness,
a man who loves people

and loves absolute justice, a man who is a perfect human being and is
named


Imam A1-Mahdi
, a man who will come in the company of Jesus Christ

(PBUH) and the righteous. By using the inherent potential of all the
worthy

men and women of all nations and I repeat, the inherent potential of
“all the

worthy men and women of all nations” he will lead humanity into
achieving

its glorious and eternal ideals.

 

Ultimate Savior

Notice that the Mahdi is superior to Jesus. Notice
the good works they are going to perform together.

What will Jesus do?

He will break the cross, kill the pigs, abolish
Jizya because there will be nobody left to pay it and perish all other
religions.  Oh, he will lead the Muslims in the final genocide,
too, fighting the people for Islam and killing the Jews.  I
disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to Islam’s
canon to obtain a clue.

Sunan Abu Dawud 37.4310  & Eternal Humiliation placed on the Jews

September 27, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Obamination @ UN Spew of Feces


As always, Obamination is a hypocrite, liar & Gd’d Traitor, to this
nation and to the human race. I spent more than an hour screening the
coarsest turds from his spew of feces and am using them as long tail
key word tags.  My critical commentary follows H1 headings
representing each of the coarsest turds.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/09/25/remarks-president-un-general-assembly

Remarks
by the President to the UN General Assembly

United
Nations Headquarters

New York, New York

10:22
A.M. EDT 09/25/’12

 Mr. President, Mr. Secretary
General, fellow delegates, ladies and gentleman:  I would like to
begin today by telling you about an American named Chris Stevens.




Chris was born in a town
called Grass Valley, California, the son of a
lawyer and a musician.  As a young man, Chris joined the Peace
Corps, and taught English in Morocco.  And he came to love and
respect the people of North Africa and the Middle East. He would carry
that commitment throughout his life.  As a diplomat, he worked
from Egypt to Syria, from Saudi Arabia to Libya.  He was known for
walking the streets of the cities where he worked — tasting the local
food, meeting as many people as he could, speaking Arabic, listening
with a broad smile.




Chris went to Benghazi in the
early days of the Libyan revolution,
arriving on a cargo ship.  As America’s representative, he helped
the Libyan people as they coped with violent conflict, cared for the
wounded, and crafted a vision for the future in which the rights of all
Libyans would be respected. And after the revolution, he supported the
birth
of a new democracy
,
as Libyans held elections, and built new institutions, and began to
move forward after decades of dictatorship.




Chris Stevens loved his
work.  He took pride in the country he
served, and he saw dignity in the people that he met.  And two
weeks ago, he traveled to Benghazi to review plans to establish a new
cultural center and modernize a hospital.  That’s when America’s
compound came under attack.  Along with three of his colleagues,
Chris was killed in the city that he helped to save. He was 52 years
old.




I tell you this story because
Chris Stevens embodied the best of
America.  Like his fellow Foreign Service officers, he built
bridges across oceans and cultures, and was deeply invested in the
international cooperation that the United Nations represents.  He
acted with humility, but he also stood up for a set of principles — a
belief that individuals should be free to determine their own destiny,
and live with
liberty,
dignity, justice
, and
opportunity.




The attacks on the civilians
in Benghazi were attacks on America.
We are grateful for the assistance we received from the Libyan
government and from the Libyan people.  There should be no doubt
that we will be relentless in tracking down the killers and
bringing
them to justice
.
And I also appreciate that in recent days, the leaders of other
countries in the region — including Egypt, Tunisia and Yemen — have
taken steps to secure our diplomatic facilities, and called for
calm.  And so have religious authorities around the globe.




But understand, the attacks
of the last two weeks are not simply an
assault on America.  They are also an assault on the very ideals
upon which the United Nations was founded — the notion that people can
resolve
their
differences peacefully
;
that diplomacy can take the place of war; that in an interdependent
world, all of us have a stake in working towards greater opportunity
and security for our citizens.




If we are serious about
upholding these ideals, it will not be enough
to put more guards in front of an embassy, or to put out statements of
regret and wait for the outrage to pass.  If we are serious about
these ideals, we must
speak
honestly about the
deeper causes of the crisis
— because we face a choice
between
the forces that would drive us apart and the
hopes
that we hold in
common.




Today, we must reaffirm that
our future will be determined by people
like Chris Stevens — and not by his killers.  Today, we must
declare that this
violence
and intolerance has no place
among our United Nations.



It has been less than two
years since a vendor in Tunisia set himself
on fire to protest the oppressive corruption in his country, and
sparked what became known as the Arab Spring.  And since then, the
world has been captivated by the
transformation
that’s taken place, and the United States has supported the forces of
change.




We were inspired by the
Tunisian protests that toppled a dictator,
because we recognized our own beliefs in the
aspiration of men
and women who took to the streets.




We insisted
on change in
Egypt, because our support for democracy ultimately put us on the side
of the people
.



We supported a transition of
leadership in Yemen, because the interests
of the people were no longer being served by a corrupt status quo.




We intervened in Libya
alongside a broad coalition, and with the
mandate of the United Nations Security Council, because we had the
ability to stop the slaughter of innocents, and because we believed
that the aspirations of the people were more powerful than a tyrant.




And as we meet here, we again
declare that the regime of Bashar
al-Assad must come to an end so that the
suffering
of the Syrian people can
stop and a new dawn can begin.




We have taken these positions
because we believe that
freedom
and self-determination are
not unique to one culture
.  These are not simply
American
values or Western values — they are
universal
values
.  And
even as there will be huge challenges to come with a transition to
democracy, I am convinced that ultimately freedom and
self-determination are not unique to one culture is more
likely to bring about the
stability,
prosperity, and individual opportunity that serve as a basis for peace

in our world.




So let us remember that this
is a season of progress.  For the
first time in decades, Tunisians, Egyptians and Libyans voted for new
leaders in elections that were credible, competitive, and fair.
This democratic spirit has not been restricted to the Arab world.
Over the past year, we’ve seen peaceful transitions of power in Malawi
and Senegal, and a new President in Somalia.  In Burma, a
President has freed political prisoners and opened a closed society, a
courageous dissident has been elected to parliament, and people look
forward to further reform.  Around the globe, people are making
their voices heard, insisting on their innate dignity, and the right to
determine their future.




And yet the turmoil of recent
weeks reminds us that the path to
democracy does not end with the casting of a ballot.  Nelson
Mandela once said:  “To be free is not merely to cast off one’s
chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of
others.”  (Applause.)




True democracy demands that
citizens cannot be thrown in jail because
of what they believe, and that businesses can be opened without paying
a bribe.  It depends on the freedom of citizens to speak their
minds and assemble without fear, and on the rule of law and due process
that guarantees the rights of all people.




In other words, true
democracy

— real freedom — is hard work.  Those in power have to resist
the temptation to crack down on dissidents.  In hard economic
times, countries must be tempted — may be tempted to rally the people
around perceived enemies, at home and abroad, rather than focusing on
the painstaking work of reform.




Moreover, there will always
be those that reject human progress –
dictators who cling to power, corrupt interests that depend on the
status quo, and
extremists
who
fan the flames of hate and division
.
From Northern Ireland to South Asia, from Africa to the Americas, from
the Balkans to the Pacific Rim, we’ve witnessed convulsions that can
accompany transitions to a new political order.




At time, the conflicts arise
along the fault lines of race or
tribe.  And often they arise from the difficulties of
reconciling
tradition and faith with
the diversity and interdependence of the modern world
.
In every country, there are those who find different religious beliefs
threatening; in every culture, those who love freedom for themselves
must ask themselves how much they’re willing to tolerate freedom for
others.




That is what we saw play out
in the last two weeks, as a
crude
and disgusting video

sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world.  Now, I have made it
clear that the United States
government
had nothing to d
o with
this video, and I believe its
message
must be rejected by all who
respect our common humanity
.

It is an insult
not only to
Muslims, but to America as well
– for as the city outside
these walls makes clear, we are
a
country that has welcomed people of every race and every faith
.
We are home to Muslims who worship across our country.  We not
only
respect
the freedom of
religion
, we have laws
that protect individuals from being
harmed
because
of how they
look or
what
they believe
.
We understand
why
people take
offense to this video

because millions of our citizens are among
them.




I know there are some who ask
why we don’t just
ban such a video.
And the answer is enshrined in our laws:  Our Constitution
protects the
right to
practice
free speech
.



Here in the United States,
countless publications provoke
offense.  Like me, the majority of Americans are Christian, and
yet we do not ban blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs.  As
President of our country and Commander-in-Chief of our military, I
accept that people are going to call me awful things every day –
(laughter) — and I will always defend their right to do so.
(Applause.)




Americans have fought and
died around the globe to protect the right of
all people to express their views, even views that we profoundly
disagree with.  We do not do so because we support hateful speech,
but because our founders understood that without such protections, the
capacity
of each individual to
express their own views and practice their own faith may be threatened
.
We do so because in a diverse society,
efforts
to restrict speech can
quickly become a tool to silence critics and oppress minorities.




We do so because given the
power of faith in our lives, and the passion
that religious differences can inflame, the strongest weapon against
hateful speech is not repression; it is
more
speech — the voices of tolerance that rally against bigotry and
blasphemy, and lift up the values of understanding and mutual respect
.



Now, I know that not all
countries in this body share this particular
understanding of the protection of free speech.  We recognize
that.  But in 2012, at a time when anyone with a cell phone can
spread offensive views around the world with the click of a button, the
notion that we can
control
the
flow of information
is
obsolete.  The question, then, is
how do we respond?




And on this we must
agree: 
There is
no speech that justifies
mindless violence
.
(Applause.)  There are no words
that excuse the killing of innocents.  There’s no
video
that justifies an attack on an
embassy
.  There’s
no
slander
that provides an excuse

for people to burn a restaurant in Lebanon, or destroy a school in
Tunis, or cause death and destruction in Pakistan.




In this modern world with
modern technologies,
for
us to respond in that way to hateful speech empowers any individual who
engages in such speech to create chaos around the world.

We empower the worst of us if that’s how we respond.




More broadly, the events of
the last two weeks also speak to the need
for all of us to honestly address the tensions between the West and the
Arab world that is moving towards democracy.




Now, let me be clear:
Just as we cannot solve every problem in
the world, t
he
United States
has not and will not seek to dictate the outcome of democratic
transitions abroad
.
We do not expect other nations to agree with us on every issue, nor do
we assume that the violence of the past weeks or the hateful speech by
some individuals represent the views of the overwhelming majority of
Muslims, any more than the views of the people who produced this video
represents those of Americans.  However, I do believe that it is
the obligation of all leaders in all countries to speak out forcefully
against violence and extremism.  (Applause.)




It is time to marginalize
those who — even when not directly resorting
to violence — use hatred of America, or the West, or Israel, as the
central
organizing principle of
politics
. For that
only gives cover, and sometimes makes an
excuse, for those who do resort to violence.




That brand of politics — one
that pits East against West, and South
against North, Muslims against Christians and Hindu and Jews — can’t
deliver on the promise of freedom.  To the youth, it offers only
false hope.  Burning an American flag does nothing to provide a
child an education.  Smashing apart a restaurant does not fill an
empty stomach.  Attacking an embassy won’t create a single
job.  That brand of politics only makes it harder to achieve
what we
must do together
:
educating our children, and creating the opportunities that they
deserve; protecting human rights, and extending democracy’s promise.




Understand America will never
retreat from the world.  We will
bring justice to those who harm our citizens and our friends, and we
will stand with our allies.  We are willing to partner with
countries around the world to deepen ties of trade and investment, and
science and technology, energy and development — all efforts that can
spark economic growth for all our people and stabilize democratic
change.




But such efforts depend on a
spirit of mutual interest and mutual
respect.  No government or company, no school or NGO will be
confident working in a country where its people are endangered.
For partnerships to be effective our citizens must be secure and our
efforts must be welcomed.




A politics based only on
anger — one based on dividing the world
between “us” and “them” — not only sets back international
cooperation, it ultimately undermines those who tolerate it.  All
of us have an interest in standing up to these forces.




Let us remember that Muslims
have suffered the most at the hands of
extremism.  On the same day our civilians were killed in Benghazi,
a Turkish police officer was murdered in Istanbul only days before his
wedding; more than 10 Yemenis were killed in a car bomb in Sana’a;
several Afghan children were mourned by their parents just days after
they were killed by a suicide bomber in Kabul.




The impulse towards
intolerance and violence may initially be focused
on the West, but over time it cannot be contained.  The same
impulses
toward extremism

are used to justify war between Sunni and Shia, between tribes and
clans.  It leads not to strength and prosperity but to
chaos.  In less than two years, we have seen largely peaceful
protests bring more change to Muslim-majority countries than a decade
of violence.  And extremists understand this.  Because they
have nothing to offer to improve the lives of people, violence is their
only way to stay relevant.  They don’t build; they only destroy.




It
is time to leave the call of
violence and the politics of division behind.

On so many issues, we face a choice between the promise of the future,
or the prisons of the past.  And we cannot afford to get it
wrong.  We must seize this moment.  And America stands ready
to work with all who are willing to embrace a better future.




The future must not belong to
those who target Coptic Christians in
Egypt — it must be claimed by those in Tahrir Square who chanted,
“Muslims, Christians, we are one.”  The future must not belong to
those who bully women — it must be shaped by girls who go to school,
and those who stand for a world where our daughters can live their
dreams just like our sons.  (Applause.)




The future must not belong to
those corrupt few who steal a country’s
resources — it must be won by the students and entrepreneurs, the
workers and business owners who seek a broader prosperity for all
people.  Those are the women and men that America stands with;
theirs is the vision we will support.


 

The
future must not belong to
those who slander the prophet of Islam
.  But to be
credible, those who condemn that slander
must
also condemn the hate

we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches
that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.  (Applause.)



Let us condemn incitement
against Sufi Muslims and Shiite
pilgrims.  It’s time to heed the words of Gandhi:  “
Intolerance
is itself a form of
violence

and an obstacle to the growth of a true democratic spirit.”
(Applause.)  Together, we must work towards a world where we are
strengthened by our differences, and not defined by them.  That is
what America embodies, that’s the vision we will support.




Among Israelis and
Palestinians, the future must not belong to those
who turn their backs on a
prospect
of peace
.
Let us leave behind those who thrive on conflict, those who reject the
right of Israel to exist.  The road is hard, but the destination
is clear — a secure, Jewish state of Israel and an independent,
prosperous Palestine.  (Applause.)  Understanding that such a
peace must come through a just agreement between the parties, America
will walk alongside all who are prepared to make that journey.




In Syria, the future must not
belong to a dictator who massacres his
people.  If there is a cause that cries out for protest in the
world today, peaceful protest, it is a regime that tortures children
and shoots rockets at apartment buildings.  And we must remain
engaged to assure that what began with
citizens
demanding their rights

does not end in a cycle of sectarian violence.




Together, we must stand with
those Syrians who believe in a different
vision — a Syria that is united and inclusive, where children don’t
need to fear their own government, and all Syrians have a say in how
they are governed — Sunnis and Alawites, Kurds and Christians.
That’s what America stands for.  That is the outcome that we will
work for — with sanctions and consequences for those who persecute,
and assistance and support for those who work for this common
good.  Because we believe that the Syrians who embrace this vision
will have the strength and the legitimacy to lead.




In Iran, we see where the
path of a violent and unaccountable ideology
leads.  The Iranian people have a remarkable and ancient history,
and many Iranians wish to enjoy peace and prosperity alongside their
neighbors.  But just as it restricts the rights of its own people,
the Iranian government continues to prop up a dictator in Damascus and
supports terrorist groups abroad.  Time and again, it has failed
to take the opportunity to demonstrate that its nuclear program is
peaceful, and to meet its obligations to the United Nations.




So let me be clear.
America wants to resolve this issue through
diplomacy, and we believe that there is still time and space to do
so.  But that time is not unlimited.  We respect the right of
nations to access peaceful nuclear power, but one of the purposes of
the United Nations is to see that we harness that power for
peace.  And make no mistake, a
nuclear-armed
Iran is not a
challenge that can be contained
.
It would threaten the elimination of Israel, the security of Gulf
nations, and the stability of the global economy.  It risks
triggering a nuclear-arms race in the region, and the unraveling of the
non-proliferation treaty.  That’s why a coalition of countries is
holding the Iranian government accountable.  And that’s why the
United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a
nuclear weapon.




We know from painful
experience that the
path to
security

and prosperity does not lie outside the boundaries of international law
and respect for human rights.  That’s why this institution was
established from the rubble of conflict.  That is why liberty
triumphed over tyranny in the Cold War.  And that is the lesson of
the last two decades as well.




History shows that peace and
progress come to those who make the right
choices.  Nations in every part of the world have traveled this
difficult path.  Europe, the bloodiest battlefield of the 20th
century, is united, free and at peace.  From Brazil to South
Africa, from Turkey to South Korea, from India to Indonesia, people of
different races, religions, and traditions have lifted millions out of
poverty, while respecting the rights of their citizens and meeting
their responsibilities as nations.




And it is because of the
progress that I’ve witnessed in my own
lifetime, the progress that I’ve witnessed after nearly four years as
President, that I remain ever hopeful about the world that we live
in.  The war in Iraq is over.  American troops have come
home.  We’ve begun a transition in Afghanistan, and America and
our allies will end our war on schedule in 2014.  Al Qaeda has
been weakened, and Osama bin Laden is no more.  Nations have come
together to lock down nuclear materials, and America and Russia are
reducing our arsenals.  We have seen hard choices made — from
Naypyidaw to Cairo to Abidjan — to put more power in the hands of
citizens.




At a time of economic
challenge, the world has come together to broaden
prosperity.  Through the G20, we have partnered with emerging
countries to keep the world on the path of recovery.  America has
pursued a development agenda that fuels growth and breaks dependency,
and worked with African leaders to help them feed their nations.
New partnerships have been forged to combat corruption and promote
government that is open and transparent, and new commitments have been
made through the Equal Futures Partnership to ensure that women and
girls can fully participate in politics and pursue opportunity.
And later today, I will discuss our efforts to combat the scourge of
human trafficking.




All these things give me
hope.  But what gives me the most hope is
not the actions of us, not the actions of leaders — it is the people
that I’ve seen.  The American troops who have risked their lives
and sacrificed their limbs for strangers half a world away; the
students in Jakarta or Seoul who are eager to use their knowledge to
benefit mankind; the faces in a square in Prague or a parliament in
Ghana who see democracy giving voice to their aspirations; the young
people in the favelas of Rio and the schools of Mumbai whose eyes shine
with promise.  These men, women, and children of every race and
every faith remind me that for every angry mob that gets shown on
television, there are billions around the world who share similar hopes
and dreams.  They tell us that there is a common heartbeat to
humanity.




So much attention in our
world turns to what divides us.  That’s
what we see on the news.  That’s what consumes our political
debates.  But when you strip it all away, people everywhere long
for the freedom to determine their destiny; the dignity that comes with
work; the comfort that comes with faith; and the justice that exists
when governments serve their people  — and not the other way
around.




The United States of America
will always stand up for these
aspirations, for our own people and for people all across the
world.  That was our founding purpose.  That is what our
history shows.  That is what Chris Stevens worked for throughout
his life.




And I promise you this:
Long after the killers are brought to
justice, Chris Stevens’s legacy will live on in the lives that he
touched — in the tens of thousands who marched against violence
through the streets of Benghazi; in the Libyans who changed their
Facebook photo to one of Chris; in the signs that read, simply, “Chris
Stevens was a friend to all Libyans.”




They should give us
hope.  They should remind us that so long as
we work for it, justice will be done, that history is on our side, and
that a rising tide of liberty will never be reversed.




Thank you very much.


birth of a new democracy

Democracy is a form only, a framework definition
upon which institutions are constructed; it has no substance and no
intrinsic value.  Without an informed, sentient, educated and
moral citizenry, democracies are doomed to early failure: they will
fall or devolve into tyrannies. True democracy is government by the
people with legislation determined by a majority vote of the citizens.
Democracy lacks provision for protection of minority rights and is
equivalent to mob rule.

Islamic democracy is an oxymoron because democracy
and Islam are polar opposites; 180° out of phase.  Democracy is
legislation through popular will. Islam is theocracy, only Allah having
the right to legislate, which he has delegated to Moe and his caliphs. [33:36]

liberty, dignity & justice

Those supremely important values can not be secured
by democracy, which is mob rule, and are 180° out of phase with Islam.
Activation and preservation  of those values requires limited,
representative government, which was the design of our Constitution.

liberty

In Islam, liberty is freedom to submit to Allah,
nothing more. Muslims are Allah’s slaves.
By definition, slaves have neither autonomy nor dignity.  True
liberty requires limited government whose limitations are strictly
enforced to prevent government from enslaving and plundering its
citizens.  Our Constitution was designed for that purpose.

dignity

In Islam, dignity is the exclusive property of
Muslims, as compared to infidels, who have neither dignity nor human
rights.  I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers to Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387
which informs literate & sentient persons that until they become
Muslims, their blood & property have no sanctity to Muslims and
they have no human rights.

justice

Just
us Muslims
‘!
Religious minorities under Islamic domination are not permitted to
testify in court against Muslims. I disrespectfully direct doubters,
dissenters & deniers to Reliance of the Traveller, O24.2,
which informs literate & sentient persons that testimony is only
accepted from Muslims; testimony is only accepted from one who “is religious (O:
meaning upright (o24.4) (A: and Muslim
), for Allah Most High
says, “Let those of rectitude among you testify” (Koran 65:2), and
unbelief is the vilest form of corruption, as goes without saying);”.

bringing them to justice

Acts of war are not justicable. They require
effective retaliation: the immediate death of the perpetrators and the
sponsors. The attack on our consulate was a deliberate act of war, not
the result of transient passion.  There is no court of immediate
jurisdiction and no enforcement agency. Our recourse is to our armed
forces, which ought rightly to eradicate Libya from the face of the
earth.

War on: Moron!

The
United States is not at war with Islam and never will be
.”
Islam is at war against us and has been so engaged since we won the War
of Independence, has been ever since and always will be so long as one
Muslim lives on the face of the earth.  When Thomas Jefferson
asked Tripoli’s Ambassador to England by what right they attacked us,
he was informed
that the right was
“founded on the Laws of the
Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all
nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that
it was their
right and duty to make war upon them
wherever they could
be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners”
I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers, including
the Traitor in Chief,
analencephalopaths, one and all to Islam’s canon
of scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence to view the fatal
facts directly:

resolve  differences peacefully

The Declaration of Independence declares that I have
rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  Islam’s
canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis and jurisprudence declares that
as an infidel, I must be “destroyed” or subjugated and make annual
extortion payments.  One who thinks that difference can be
resolved thinks with his anal sphincter, not his brain.  The
conflict between Islam and the American way is existential: one side
must be exterminated.

speak honestly

If Obamination has ever spoken honestly about
anything substantial, I missed it. That inveterate liar
dissembles constantly.  The conflict with Islam is caused by the
damnable doctrines of Islam, not by anything
our government or any citizen did or did not do excluding
only submission to Islam. The conflict continues until we are Muslims
or they are not.  Jimmy Farter, Bush, Slick Willy & Shrub
never spoke honestly about Islam, Obamination will not and if Romney
does, I will be blessed surprised.

Had the Embassy guards mounted an effective defense,
the world would be viewing a constant stream of images of dead and
wounded Muslims, grieving widows & orphans and new and larger
protests. We get blamed no matter what. Damned if you do and damned if
you dont; so lets terminate relations and get our diplomats out of
there.

common hopes

Camel Crap!!! we have nothing in common with
Muslims.  They want to kill us and dominate the entire world. They
value death more than we value life. To them, the life of this world is
but play and pastime: 6:32, 29:64, 47:36 & 57:20 the real deal is Allah’s Celestial Bordello 78:31.

 causes of the crisis

The crisis is caused by the damnable doctrines of
Islam outlined
above
Innocence
of Muslims
did not cause the crisis. Charlie Hebdo’s cartoons
did not cause the crises: those are pretexts, not causes.  The
violence arises out of kutbah at Jumah Salat: the rabid ranting of
Imams in the mosques as reported in the mass media for those who do not
attend regularly.

violence and intolerance have no place

Obviously, rioting has no place in the modern world.
There is no such clarity concerning intolerance. The official line is
that “Innocence of Muslims” is a token of intolerance; that it
constitutes incitement to violence. In reality, it exposes the
intolerance & violence intrinsic to the core of Islam; it is no
more intolerant nor violent than Fitna, the
documentary by Geert Wilders.

transformation

Exchanging one tyrant for another with “one man, one
vote, one time” ‘democracy’ is not a positive change.  The only
good that came of the ‘Arab Spring’ is great numbers of dead Muslims
and wasted money & resources expended in the revolutions.
Most revolutions follow the French model, not the American model.
To the extent that the money and resources come from our tax payers and
national debt, they are great losses which can not be recouped.

aspiration

A few of the protesters shared our values, but those
with the war material and money who waged the revolution do not and
never will.  Their highest aspiration is to be killed in battle so
as to get their ticket to al-Firdhaus: the highest level of Allah’s
Celestial Bordello.

insisted on change in Egypt

You overthrew Mubarak, a semi-secular Muslim, and
replaced him with Morsi, of the  Ikhwan,  who is more likely
to breach the peace treaty with Israel. You gained nothing and lost
much including regional stability.

support for democracy

Democracy is not worthy of support, only limited,
representative government  can promote human rights, justice and
equality all of which are impossible in an Islamic environment.

on the side of the people

The majority of the people of Egypt are Muslims who
hate Jews & Christians and need to wage war against us.  How
can we be on the side of our enemies?  The tiny minority who seek
liberty never had a chance in Hell and never will while Muslims are in
the majority.

suffering of the Syrian people

The suffering of the Syrian people can not stop and
no new dawn of liberty can rise while they are Muslims.  Until
they abandon Islam, they can only suffer from continued striving to
obtain and consolidate power.  Replacing one tyrant with another
is like replacing one loaded diaper with another.  The only
benefit is the reduction in the number of living Muslims.

freedom  ain’t limited to one culture

Islam is derived from a tribal culture, and areas
dominated by it were primarily tribal when Islam took over.  Islam
is not compatible with freedom & self-determination, it is their
polar opposite: slavery.

universal values

Camel Crap!!! Muslims do not share our values! They
value genocidal conquest, terrorism, world domination and being killed
in the process for their ticket to al-Firdhaus.

stability, prosperity, & opportunity–basis for peace

Rational morality is the only basis for peace.
Until the entire world is rational
and moral
: not
Muslim
,
overwhelming military strength coupled with the will to use it without
reservation are the only basis for peace.  To establish peace,
exterminate the warmongers.

true democracy

Democracy does not demand that citizens can not be
imprisoned for unpopular beliefs; neither does it proscribe
bribery.  Only a just and moral populace electing just and moral
representatives and governors in a limited representative republic can
enforce those demands, and even in America, there is no
perfection.

extremists

Camel crap!!! There are no extremists; only
believers.  Believers are only those who fight in Allah’s cause,
killing others and being killed.  I disrespectfully direct
doubters, dissenters & deniers to 8:1-6,
9:111 & 49:15 which define Believers.

reconciling  faith with  the modern world

The Qur’an is Allah’s operating manual for human
life in all places at all times. It can not be edited.  It is
perfected. It is final. The gates of ijtihad closed forever more than
900 years ago.  Islam can not be reconciled, it must be
exterminated.  If vampirism were not mythical,  it would be
the equivalent of Islam.

 crude and disgusting video

Innocence
of Muslims

may be crude, with poor casting, acting & production values, but it
is not disgusting. The Islamic biography history and doctrines it
exposes to public view are disgusting.  For full documentation of
the fatal facts, turn to this blog post:  http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the
.

government had nothing to do with it

Destroying the Muslim’s faith: causing them to
quit believing in Allah, his threat & promise, is the essential
key to victory

in the war against Islam.  Since Most Muslims can’t read, movies
are the best way to reach the Ummah with the facts that can induce
doubt & introspection which lead to apostasy.  Dr. Ali Sina
and at least one other writer have created scripts which are ready to
produce.  The government should be producing and distributing a
full length feature documentary film  based on the  Qur’an,
hadith, sira & tahrik.  The government won’t do it, so
the project is left up to the private sector.

message must be rejected

The message of Innocence of Muslims
is that Moe was an impious fraud; a lunatic who issued situational
scripture to sanction his sexual proclivities and motivate his
companions to engage in barbarian rapine for his personal emolument.
The message is true and must be embraced, not rejected by open minded
lovers of life and liberty.

insult  to Muslims, and America

The truthful message of Innocence of Muslims
is no insult to America or anyone else: it is truth; the fatal facts of
Islam.

 welcomed people of every faith

Welcoming Islam’s fifth column to invade our shores
is the worst mistake we ever made. Europe is slowly discovering the
same, much to their sorrow. As their numbers increase here, the
violence will increase, and we will come to regret our fatal
error.  Expelling and excluding Muslims is essentially necessary
to preserving our lives and liberties.

respect the freedom of religion

Freedom of religions is for religions, not crime
syndicates. Islam is a continuing criminal enterprise; a war crime:
terrorist, genocidal conquest undertaken for the personal emolument of
Islam’s founder and his caliphs.  Islam does not respect freedom
of religion! I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers to Reliance of the Traveller O11.5.

harmed because

We have laws that proscribe assault and murder,
which are malum in se as well as malum prohibita, without reference to
ethnicity or faith.  Islam declares and prosecutes war upon all
non-Muslims.  If that ain’t harmful, what the Hell is?

why people take offense to this video

As Charlie Brown said “Nobody likes having his
cherished beliefs questioned.” The fact that Islam’s fifth column
invaders are present is immaterial to the offense issue.  Because
Islam is an impious fraud which stands on or falls from the foundation
of one man,  revelation of his true character and actions offends
Muslims. Moe had a habit of having his critics assassinated for that
very reason.  What genuine Prophet of God asks his disciples “Who
will kill…”. Moe did, more than once.

ban such a video

For a decade, the UN has been passing annual
resolutions demanding the passage and enforcement of national
legislation criminalizing criticism of Islam.  Those resolutions
are non-binding, giving immoral authority to blasphemy laws in
Indonesia, Pakistan and other Islamic countries.  Those laws are
used to persecute indigenous minorities.  Now the OIC members are
renewing their contumacious demands.  To Hell with them!

right to practice free speech

Only the rights to free speech and to bear arms
allow us to preserve our other rights. Without those foundational
rights, all other rights will be forfeit.  America is under attack
by Islam.  Our self defense requires that we be able to accurately
and honestly discuss Islamic doctrines and practices, not only in blogs
and movies but also in courses in West Point and the War College.
The blasphemy laws demanded by the OIC would have criminalized Thomas
Jefferson’s 1786 report to Congress on his meeting with the Ambassador
from Tripoli.

efforts to restrict speech

Are specifically intended to oppress minorities;
that is how blasphemy laws are used in Indonesia and Pakistan. That is
also the foundation of the Fairness Doctrine which gave the left wing a
monopoly on public discourse for decades.  That is why LibTurds are trying to reinstate the
Fairness Doctrine, so that they can take Rush Limbaugh and his
colleagues off the air.

more speech

That is a reference to the contradiction concept
enshrined in the Istanbul Process of Res. 16/18. Smearing Islam’s
critics by stamping labels of “bigot”, “hater” & “racist” does not
cut the mustard. You need to provide relevant, verifiable factual
evidence which disproves the evidence we present from Islam’s canon.
Unfortunately for you, it ain’t possible to disprove the fatal facts of
Islam.

understanding

Understanding comes from extensive study of Islam:
the damnable doctrines enshrined in the Qur’an, whose implementation is
exemplified in the hadith & sira. That is why I provide links to
Islam’s canon.

mutual respect

Respect is given where respect is due. Barbarian
warlords are not respectable. Lechers who molest little girls are not
respectable. Lechers who  arrange the marriage and divorce of
their sons so that they can pickup the rebound are not respectable.
Lechers who invade passive villages, kill the men, rape their widows
and enslave their orphans are not respectable.  Profiteers who
‘reveal’ situational scripture, falsely attributing words to God to
sanction their depredations and sexual proclivities are not
respectable.  Cult members who revere the above described Profit,
considering him to be the best and greatest of men and seeking to
emulate him as their role model are not respectable.  The cult
they belong to which inculcates hatred and incites genocidal conquest
and terrorism is not respectable, neither is it tolerable.
Sentient  informed  and moral persons will neither respect
nor tolerate Islam.

control the flow of information

India has recently been trying to bloc access to web
sites including Facebook and Twitter. They have also turned off cell
phone access.  Capacity to control the flow of information is not
the question: the will to squelch it is.  Muslims are using the
new technology to organize their riots and genocidal attacks as well as
spreading panic.  Squelching their new tactics without impairing
free access to the web is practically impossible.

 no speech that justifies

Islam requires no provocation, as noted above.
Cartoons, books and videos are convenient  pretexts, not
provocations. Islamic violence is never justified, only rationalized;
always commanded by Allah and exemplified by Moe.

hateful speech

Fitna,
Innocence of
Muslims
, the Motoons and The Prophet of Doom
are not hate speech, they are truthful speech.  Islam and
Muslims are indeed proper objects of hatred, just as Nazis and
Communists are, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with verbal
expression of that hatred, but the above listed publications are not
hate speech.

empowers

In
this modern world with modern
technologies, for
us to respond in that way to hateful speech empowers any individual who
engages in such speech to create chaos around the world.

We empower the worst of us if that’s how we respond.
  

The sentence quoted above is a prime example
of  Malpropism: while pretending to mount a defense of free
speech, Obamination actually reinforces the Barbarian’s attack against
it.

Innocence
of Muslims
is obviously intended to educate and stimulate deeper
study of Islam’s canon, not to provoke violence.   “creation
of chaos” and “disruption of world peace” are veiled threats used by
the OIC to rationalize their demands for imposition of their blasphemy
laws.

hateful

That word is a label used to divert attention from
the proper subject of debate and to deligitimize critics of Islam
without submission of proof.

bigoted

That word is another empty label, loaded with
emotion without substance used for distraction & deligimization.

racist

That word fills out the triumvirate of favorite
imprecations used by would be tyrants and dictators to squelch dissent
without providing facts, evidence or logic to prove evil intentions or
demonstrate the existence of actual harm or wrongdoing.

worst of us

The worst are those who claim to be the best:
Muslims and the arrogant, self-righteous, holier than though AssWholes
who do their bidding.  Obamination attaches the “worst of us”
label to the creator of Innocence of Muslims
without any justification.

 dictate the outcome

Now,
let me be clear:  Just
as we cannot solve every problem in the world, the United States has not and will
not seek to dictate the outcome of democratic transitions abroad
.

We lost the wars in Iraq & Afghanistan precisely
because we did not seek to “dictate the outcome”. We won in Germany
& Japan precisely because we did.

Constitutions enshrining the Qur’an as the basis of law in both cases
exemplify our defeat: the strategic objective of removing Afghanistan
& Iraq from the  membership in the set of terror sponsoring
states has not been obtained and never will be.

hatred as

The central organizing principle of politics
: Islam!  “Wala wal Bara”: love and hate for the sake of
Allah.

can’t deliver on the promise of freedom

Freedom is not the object of Islam: slavery
is.  Only limited government can deliver on the promise of
freedom.

what we must do together

That brand of politics only makes
it harder to achieve
what we
must do together
:
educating our children, and creating the opportunities that they
deserve; protecting human rights, and extending democracy’s promise.

Education and opportunity are national, not
international activities.  Obamination is promoting International
Socialism again.

impulses toward extremism

The correct term is Islam.  Islam and Islam
alone, as preached and practiced by Moe is falsely stamped with the
label of extremism.  Islam is extreme, by design.  There is
no moderate, benign and anodyne Islam.  It is pure, unmitigated
evil, was so from its inception and always will be.  Jihad is the
central operating principle of Islam, requiring  some enemy to
conquer. Without conquest, Islam stagnates and declines.

call of violence

Islam is the call of violence; Islam as preached and
practiced by Moe, which is incapable of reform. It must become extinct.

politics  of division

The passage of that phrase, through the lips of the
supreme practitioner of the politics of division, is a token of extreme
arrogance & narcissism, like the arrogant, super confident con man
who tips his hand, secure in the belief that his mark is too stupid to
perceive it.  No words can adequately express my disgust.

slander the prophet

The
future must not belong to those
who slander the prophet of Islam
.  But to be credible,
those who condemn that slander
must
also condemn the hate

we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches
that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.

In Shari’ah, slander is anything the hearer would
not like.  Moe commissioned hits on his critics. The future must
not belong to those who emulate him.  The future must be without
Islam.

Balanced condemnation  does not confer
credibility. Condemning “Piss Christ” and other blasphemies does not
alter the fact that the conceptual content of FitnaInnocence of Islam  & The Prophet of Doom is factually
true.  There is absolutely no justification for attempts to
criminalize criticism of Islam!

prospect of peace

Among Israelis and Palestinians,
the future must not belong to those
who turn their backs on a prospect
of peace
.
Let us leave behind those who thrive on conflict, those who reject the
right of Israel to exist.

There is no prospect of peace and can be none while
there are living Muslims on the face of the earth.  Islam thrives
on conflict and rejects the right of Jews to live and Israel to
exist.   I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers to Islam’s canon for edification, which, in the case of
analencephalopaths, will be of no benefit because they are incapable of
learning.

independent, prosperous Palestine

Translation: independent, prosperous Israel.
Israel and Palestine are two names for the same location.
“Palestinians” are interlopers and illegal occupiers, not indigenous to
Israel.  Send them home and let
Israel live in peace and security.

citizens demanding their rights

In  Syria, as elsewhere in the “Arab Spring”,
the rebels are seekers of power, not citizens demanding their rights;
those have neither guns nor bombs. Only Muslim terrorists who seek
national and international domination have automatic weapons, bombs and
rpgs in those conflicts.

holding the Iranian government accountable

Who will bell the cat? Nobody, unless Israel decides
to act alone.  The Security Council can not act because Iran’s
patrons have veto power.  Iran’s tactical objective is to create
chaos by nuking Israel, which they believe will spark the return of the
mythical 12th Imam.  Twelvers are irrational, they are not subject
to the persuasion of mutually assured destruction. They welcome
“martyrdom”. Giving them “martyrdom” is the only possibility.
Letting them have nuclear rectors which generate radioactive waste
which can be used in bombs or dirty bombs is the worst of fool’s
errands.  Peace and security will only be assured if Iran is
un-Islamic or extinct.

September 26, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, Politics, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Caliphate: The Global Islamic Civilization


Caliphate: The Global Islamic Civilization

“The Global Islamic Civilization: The Power of a
Nation Revived”
is
a malignant manifesto of arrogant supremacism,  nothing new.
It is a restatement of long established Islamic doctrines

The American Muslim speculates that it
is spurious
, created by “Islamophobes”, functionally
equivalent to The Protocols of the
Elders of Zion.
while I will give TAM credit for posting links
to the manifesto, the author’s blog & Facebook
page
, I am not convinced that the manifesto is spurious. I did not
find any evidence to discredit it.

I do not know whether the quotes about wiping Christianity off the earth, etc.
are accurate or not and I am not concerned about them.  It ain’t
what they say or write that bothers me: I am concerned about their
aspirations & intentions.

Islamic Revival

Islamic revival is not a novel concept.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 37, Number 4278:

Narrated AbuHurayrah:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Allah will raise for
this community at the end of every hundred years the one who will
renovate its religion for it.

Faith & piety are required for Islam’s success.
Muslims   can not be successful if they do not obey Allah and
emulate Moe.  Therein lies a major problem.

Jihad: The forgotten Obligation

What are the consequences of abandoning jihad?  Hilali & Khan, in their footnote
to Surah Al-Baqarag 2:190, list several of them.

  • Islam is destroyed
  • Muslims
    • fall into an inferior position
    • lose their
      •  honor
      •  lands
      • rule and authoity.

One hadith teaches us a great deal about jihad:

  • Jihad is
    • a preferable economic alternative to
      • trade
      • agriculture
    • the “original religion” of Islam.
  • Allah will curse Muslims by making disgrace prevail over them if
    they abandon jihad for agriculture.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction,
hold the tails
of oxen, are
pleased with agriculture, and
give up conducting jihad
(struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over
you,
and will not withdraw it until you return to your original
religion.

Ummah = empire

This gem comes from the third page of the manifesto.

“People who follow Islam are divinely
selected and guided by the Almighty Allah Himself, these people then
form part of a great Islamic Civilization, that are united as one Nation, a Universal
Empire, known as the Muslim Ummah

How are empires built? How did the ancestors of most
Muslims alive today become Muslims?  Jihad!  By universal,
the author means global.  The caliphate must be all inclusive,
ruling the entire world.

best nation

On the fourth page of the manifesto, Surah Al-Imran
3:110 is quoted.

3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real
followers of Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples
ever raised up for mankind
; you
enjoin Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has
ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar
(polytheism, disbelief and all that
Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the
Scripture

(Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them;
among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fâsiqûn
(disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s Command).

3:111. They will do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if they fight against
you, they will show you their backs,
and they will not be
helped.

3:112. Indignity
is put over them wherever they may be
,
except when under a covenant (of protection) from Allâh, and from men;
they have drawn on themselves the Wrath of Allâh, and destruction is
put over them. This is because they disbelieved in the Ayât (proofs,
evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh and
killed the Prophets without right. This is because they disobeyed
(Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh’s disobedience,
crimes and sins).

Allah was telling the Muslims that they are the best ummah
because they enjoin the right and forbid the wrong.   He also told
them that we would not mount an effective resistance to their
conquest.  There is something more that you need to know, which
can only be found in a hadith which explains 3:111.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.” means, the best of
peoples for the people, as you bring them
with chains on
their necks till they embrace Islam
.

The highlighted clause contains a clue for you; read it again.
Shall we be brought to Islam in chains?  My response is too
profane to print.

Islam’s right to rule

After proclaiming the supposed moral superiority of
Islam, the manifesto gets down to brass tacks on page 6.

It would be the most Moral Society on
the face of the earth, it is such people that deserve full respect and
honor, it is such people that not only deserve to Rule the World,
it is their Right
to Rule the World
.

Reformers

Page 14 of the manifesto is loaded with meaning.
Reformation would involve removing the genocidal conquest imperatives.
Of course, that is impossible because Islam is perfected & immutable.

“The enemies of Islam have been working
hard on weakening the Imaan (faith) and belief of the entire Muslim
Ummah and their attack is on every individual Muslim and they are using
the Munafiqeen (Hypocrites) among us, the Munafiq [our hidden enemy]
are clearly identified just as the Almighty Allah mentions in the Holy
Quran.  These people [our hidden enemies] have been working on a
project to try and destroy Islam from within, this project is known as Reformation of Islam,
I repeat so look at the words [Reformation of Islam] not reformation of
people to Islam, my beloved brothers, sisters, elders and respected
Ulama they know very well of our grievances and they use this to their
advantage, instead of following what Allah and His Messenger subscribes
for us [the Shariah of al Islam]
they subscribe the vile Kufr system called Democracy, they call
themselves Reformists, Modernist and Moderate Muslims yet nothing about
them resembles a Muslim with the lowest amount of faith.
They claim to
be the voice of the Muslim Ummah but they are the mouthpieces of the
Kufaar.”

 

Jihad

This subject leads off page 16 of the manifesto with
a grand deception.

“All Praise is due to Allah, who has
based the heavens and the earth on justice and given permission to the
oppressed to take revenge from his oppressor in due measure. [Satement
by one of the Mujahideen who met the Barakah of Martyrdom] Oh fellow
Believers, We find the Almighty Allah commands us to Fight those “The
Kufaar” who fight against us, and to fight them is Fard (Compulsory)
upon all Muslims, and Allah lays down the criteria of justice for Jihad
“great struggle” against them in the Holy Quran [Surah Al Baqara
2:190-193],

And such True Believers can never be defeated, for Allah is always
their Defender and Helper: And be not weak hearted, nor grieve, for you
will have the upper hand, if you are True Believers. [Surah 3:139]”

Surah Al Baqara 2:190-193 is supposed to apply to defensive jihad,
when Muslim lands are invaded. Keep a sharp eye open for deceit.

2:190. And fight in the Way of Allâh those who fight you,
but transgress not
the limits
.
Truly, Allâh likes not the transgressors. [This Verse is the first one
that was revealed in connection with Jihâd, but it was supplemented by
another (V.9:36)].

2:191. And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from
where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah is worse than killing.
And fight not with them at Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (the sanctuary at
Makkah), unless they (first) fight you there. But if they attack you,
then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.

2:192. But if they cease, then Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

2:193. And fight
them until there is no more Fitnah
(disbelief and
worshipping of others along with Allâh) and (all and every kind of)
worship is for Allâh (Alone
). But if they cease, let there be no
transgression except against Az-Zâlimûn (the polytheists, and
wrong-doers, etc.)

2:190 does not say those who attack
you
, it says those who fight
you
;
in other words: those who resist your conquest. “The limits” means
primarily  ghulul & flight in the face of the enemy.
Embezzlement of spoils is the second worst offense, exceeded only by
abandoning jihad. Killing women, children and monks is prohibited not
on moral grounds, but because they are  “property for Muslims
i.e. slaves.

Examine the terminal conditions, highlighted in
2:193. Worship is for Allah alone.  Compare that verse to Surah
Al-Anfal 8:39 which is obviously offensive, not defensive.

8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah
(disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion
(worship) will all be for Allâh Alone
[in
the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides
Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

Furthermore, the citation to Surah Al-Imran 3:139 is deceptive because of lack of context;
read through 145 and compare it to  Surah Muhammad  47:35.

Page 17 ends with an exhortation to fight.

“Fellow Muslims, our struggle
continues, to protect our state of affairs, to protect our faith, to
defend Islam will always be a struggle, we struggle to spiritually
uplift ourselves to that desired status, we want to be counted by
Allah, we want to serve Him in the best way we can, but fellow Muslims,
our religion is under attack. Learn how to respond and respond with
power and might, you are a great nation after all. Allah says fear not
man but Fear Me, fellow Believers our enemy is weak and we
need to crush this weak enemy
, we cannot be silent, action is required.
If you are a True
Believer you will defend the cause of Islam, everything you owe to
Allah or have you forgotten your duty?

The Enemies of Islam does not want us to have an Islamic State, they do
not want us to govern our affairs by the Shariah of Allah, they fear
the leadership of the Khalifah which is part of the foundation upon
which the pillars of Islam rests, we cannot stress enough on the
importance of Global
Imamat
(A
Worldwide Leadership), with an Imam to make sure that the affairs of
the Muslim Ummah are attended to in conformity to the Justice and Rule
of Islamic Law, the minute you subscribe to learning the Quran so that
you can try to understand it, the Kufaar (non-Muslims) they will call
you a fundamentalist, an extremist, a terrorist, they
don‟t want you to become a real Muslim,
they want you to keep quiet, they want to silence and blind the Light
of PURE ISLAM. The Enemies of Islam will lie to you about the matter of
Amir ul Mumineen, they will say it was abolished, it ended!
Authubillah! May Allah protect us from believing this falsehood.”

Well, wise guy, if  Attatu8rk did not dissolve
the caliphate, who is the current caliph?

Bottom line

“We live in a brave new world of what
was previously unimagined and unimaginable possibilities; fellow
Believers our New
World Order
is such that it is based on Sublime Character and
Distinctive Morality
that will set the course of human history
on a path of peace,
tranquility, honor and dignity
.
Mankind will finally be free from a world of enslavement, it is our
duty to protect the world from corruption and all forms of evilty,
everyone, both Muslim and Non-Muslim deserve to live in a
world that is safe and secure
, Fellow Muslims the Holy Quran is
the Declaration of Human Rights, if a Non-Muslim asks you regarding his or her rights under
the Shariah of Allah
,
refer them to the Holy Quran as it clearly states their rights,
freedoms and protection under the rule of the Khalifah. Fellow
Believers we know very well that the enemies of Islam will always try
to distort the Image of our beautiful religion, we know that they
deceive their own people and they will do anything in their power to
oppress and stop those who try and attempt a Revolution for real
change, The Islamophobic Racists would kill and imprison their own
people who dares to challenge their evil system of manipulation and
greed, you can protest, go on a hunger strike, set yourself on fire in
a demonstration, demand a revolution and you will fail because they
will stop you because you are powerless, you will lose your dignity,
your respect, your honor and soon they will call you the enemy. Turn to
Allah and you will be successful… The Almighty Allah says in the Holy
Quran that He will not change the condition of a people unless they
change that which is within themselves so REVIVE ISLAM WITHIN YOU!”

Islam inverts everything.  Having four wives,
divorcing them by triple talaq and raping captive women is a strange sort of
morality. ‘Marying’ a six year old girl who has not reached
puberty is hardly an exemplar of morality.  Waging genocidal conquest until “only Allah is worshiped”
and Jews & Christians are humbled, subjugated & extorted is a great way to make
peace, ain’t it?

Rights

One hadith has powerful clues for you.  Pay
particular attention to the emphasized clauses.  Your blood and
property are not sacred to Muslims, you have no human rights and are
subject of an open season.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered
to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped
but Allah.’ And if
they say
so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter
as we slaughter, then
their blood and property will be sacred to us
and we will not
interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with
Allah.
” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik,
“O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He
replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but
Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our
slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same
rights and obligations as other Muslims
have.”

Restrictions

As a Christian dhimmi under the caliph, you are
subject to the rules & regulations of the Pact of Umar. You can not
pray aloud in public, hold processions, display crosses, ring bells or
build and maintain churches. If you say anything negative about Islam
you will be executed. Got a clue yet?

O11.5

Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply
with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life,
reputation, and property. In addition, they:

-1- are penalized for committing adultery or
theft, thought not for drunkenness;

-2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress,
wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);

-3- are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykum”;

-4- must keep to the side of
the street
;

-5- may not build higher than or as high as the
Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not
razed;

-6- are forbidden to openly display wine or
pork, (A: to ring
church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or
make public display of their funerals and feastdays;

-7- and are forbidden to build new
churches
.

O11.10

The agreement is also violated (A: with respect
to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the
following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway,
though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement,
then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:

-1- commits adultery with a Muslim woman or
marries her;

-2- conceals spies of hostile forces;

-3- leads a Muslim away from Islam;

-4- kills a Muslim;

-5- or mentions something
impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him
peace), or Islam.

Name Game

This is not a function of al-Qaeda,. Muslim
Brotherhood or any other subset of Islam: it is Islam!!! How do you hope to
understand this fatal fact without reading the Qur’an, hadith and
Shari’ah?  I have provided links to Islam’s canon of scripture,
tradition & jurisprudence in this blog post. I can lead you to
information but I can’t make you read it.

Allah commands conquest in 8:39 & 9:29 and he demands “great slaughter” in 8:67. In 9:120 he promises an upgrade in his celestial
bordello for acts of terrorism.

Allah promises Muslims who join the jihad admission to
his celestial bordello.  He threatens those who refuse with eternal damnation.

Can you get a clue?  If you do get a clue, what will you do with
it?

We have two possible options: preemptive nuclear
attack or preemptive ideological attack.  Either we make them quit
breathing, we make them quit believing, or they will conquer and
enslave us. Which will it be?

July 9, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

UN Counter Terrorism: Malignant Malarkey!


A/66/L.53
Draft resolution submitted by the President of the General Assembly
The United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy Review

How does anyone expect to solve a serious problem without first identifying it and researching its cause?  The UN can not define terrorism because the OIC member states insist that Islamic attacks against Israel are “legitimate resistance”, not terrorism.

The draft resolution includes boiler plate common to many resolutions:

Reaffirming also that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any
religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group, [Emphasis added.]

That statement is an inversion of truth and morality; part of the problem, not part of the solution.  Terrorism is not an enemy, it is a tactic. Whose tactic is it?
Terrorism is associated with Islam because of egregious statements made in Islam’s canon of scripture & tradition.  Examine the evidence: Allah said that he would cast terror into the hearts of disbelievers.

  • 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers)
  • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.”

Allah commanded Muslims to treat their victims harshly so as to terrify other prospective victims.

  • 8:57. So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.

Other translators use more explicit terms.

Another ayeh confirms this one, fitting hand in glove with it, warning other intended victims.

  • 59:2. He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Bani An-Nadir) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allah! But Allah’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).

Allah commanded Muslims to maximize military strength to terrify potential enemies.

  • 8:60. And make ready against them all you can of power, including steeds of war (tanks, planes, missiles, artillery, etc.) to threaten the enemy of Allah and your enemy, and others besides whom, you may not know but whom Allah does know. And whatever you shall spend in the Cause of Allah shall be repaid unto you, and you shall not be treated unjustly.

Other translators are more explicit.

Allah cast terror, you have seen one example, another is more graphic concerning the consequences.

  • 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
  • 33:27. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.

Allah promised a great reward to terrorists: extra credit towards an upgrade to their seats in his Celestial Bordello.

  • 9:120. It was not becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins of the neighbourhood to remain behind Allah’s Messenger (Muhammad SAW when fighting in Allah’s Cause) and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer their own lives to his life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allah, nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness. Surely, Allah wastes not the reward of the Muhsinun

Any step taken to injure or enrage a disbeliever is a “deed of righteousness”.  On Judgment Day, Allah will weigh their sins against their good deeds. [7:8] [The Meaning of weighing the Deeds] The balance will determine their eternal destination: Celestial Bordello or fire.

Muhammad was not silent concerning terrorism: he bragged about it.

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:
    Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:
    The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given to any one else before me.
    1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.
    2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.
    3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.
    4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of Resurrection).
    5. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

It is clear on the face of the Qur’an & hadith that terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam.  Allah said he would cast terror, cast terror and his messenger was made victorious with terror. During the reign of Zia ul-Haq, Brig. S.K. Malik wrote a strategy manual for the army of Pakistan.  Two quotes stand out like sore thumbs.

This paragraph comes from the bottom of page 59. [Emphasis added.]

Terror struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only
a means, it is the end in itself. Once a condition of terror into
the opponent’s heart is obtained, hardly anything is left to be
achieved. It is the point where the means and the end meet
and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon
the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.

There is one necessary prerequisite for instilling terror: the destruction of our faith. Islam’s strong faith shields Muslims from being terrorized. This paragraph comes from page 60. [Emphasis added.]

Terror cannot be struck into the hearts of an army by merely
cutting its lines of communication or depriving it of its routes
of withdrawal. It is basically related to the strength or weakness
of the human soul. It can be instilled only if the opponent’s
Faith is destroyed. Psychological dislocation is temporary;
spiritual dislocation is permanent. Psychological dislocation can be
produced by a physical act but this does not hold good of the
spiritual dislocation. To instill terror into the hearts of the enemy,
it is essential. in the ultimate analysis, to dislocate his Faith. An
invincible Faith is immune to terror. A weak Faith offers inroads
to terror. The Faith conferred upon us by the Holy Qur’an has
the inherent strength to ward off terror from us and to enable
us to strike terror into the enemy. Whatever the form or type of
strategy directed against the enemy, it must, in order to be effective,
be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy. A strategy
that fails to attain this condition suffers from inherent drawbacks
and weaknesses; and should be reviewed and modified. This rule
is fully applicable to nuclear as well as conventional wars. It is
equally true of the strategy of nuclear deterrence in fashion
today. To be credible and effective, the strategy of deterrence
must be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy.

Who created the association of Islam and terrorism?  The texts leave no doubt: Muhammad deliberately cultivated a reputation for barbarian rapine in the hope  of so terrifying his victims that they would surrender without a fight.  The Qur’anic Concept of War   shows us that  the association continues in modern times.

In his last instructions to the Magnificent Nineteen, Mohamed Atta wrote: “When the confrontation begins, strike like champions who do not want to go back to this world. Shout, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers.” [http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/sep/30/terrorism.september113]  Can anyone forget the words from the cockpit voice recorder?

The United Nations denies the identity of the enemy and its use of terrorism as a battle tactic. Instead, it seeks to conceal the fatal facts.   It is not sincerely interested in solving the problem of escalating terrorism; the UN is part of the problem, not part of the solution.

June 29, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Islamophobia: Red Meat for Wired Truth Haters


In Wired Magazine’s Danger Room,
Noah Shachtman and Spencer Ackerman  pander to left wingers who
passionately hate  those who tell the truth about Islam.  The
pandering takes the form of  a provocative headline followed by a
slide show  containing images from  Lt. Col. Matthew A.
Dooley’s classroom presentation.

The first slide  consists of a headline and
five bullet points, one of which I could easily go negative on but I
am  aware that the  slide is an outline, which refers to
other course materials not presently in view, so I will reserve
judgment.

The first point declares that parts of the
strategy will be  considered politically incorrect,  an
obvious understatement.  In  war, the emphasis must be
on  militarily correct strategy & tactics, not on
maintaining a PC image.

The second point informs us that the fourth Geneva
Convention rules are not applicable to terrorism and hints at a “Phase
III” which includes the destruction of Islam’s “holy” cities. The
historical precedents listed will be interpreted as suggesting the use
of nuclear weapons to destroy Mecca & Medina.

The third point rules out deterrence.  Islamic
jihad can not be deterred, it can only be delayed.  Our
strategists need to wrap their minds around the Qur’an’s Surah Al-Anfal
and consider it as a whole with emphasis on 8:38, 60 & 65.  Deterrence does not apply to Islam
because Muslims believe in Allah, his threat & promise.  Brig. S.K. Malik explained this in page 60 of The Qur’anic Concept of War : Islam makes Muslims immune to
terror, hence to deterrence.

The fourth point reiterates the inapplicability of
the Geneva Conventions to terrorists.  The fifth point asks
whether the conventions should be reconsidered to disqualify non state
actors.

That image is one of 28 pages in a pdf document
which I would be inclined to describe as a course outline
.
The
authors  claim to have obtained “hundreds
of pages of course material and reference documents “.  So, how do they classify the
course?

The
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff recently ordered the entire U.S.
military to scour its training material to make sure it doesn’t contain
similarly hateful
material
, a process that is still ongoing.” [Emphasis added.]

It appears that Noah Shachtman and
Spencer Ackerman confuse truth and hate.  Strip out the political
correctness, confusion & cognitive dissonance from the course, and
what remains is a mixture of objective factual reality and strategic
analysis.   The authors do not see the course in the cold
light of reality, they view it in the darkness of propaganda.
Examine this exemplary paragraph. [Emphasis & links origtinal.]

For
the better part of the last decade, 
a
small cabal of self-anointed counterterrorism experts
 has
been working its way through the U.S. military, intelligence and law
enforcement communities, trying to convince whoever it could that 
America’s
real terrorist enemy wasn’t al-Qaida
 —
but the Islamic faith itself. In his course, Dooley brought in these
anti-Muslim demagogues as guest lecturers. And he took their argument
to its final, ugly conclusion.

“Cabal”, “self-anointed”,  “demagogues”:  when
you can not refute the message: attack the messenger.  Where
were OBL
& Al-Qaeda in  the Barbary
Wars
?
Who attacked our shipping and why?  Look it up at Wikipedia if you
don’t know.  Ambassadors Jefferson & Adams asked Tripoli’s
Ambassador to London and were told that the ‘right’ to sack our
shipping
was established in Islamic law. His reply runs parallel to that of
Al-Mughira to a Persian general.  [Emphasis & links added.]

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord,
has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone
or give Jizya
(i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed
us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed
(i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as
he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become
your master.”
[Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386]

The concluding paragraphs of the first article in
the series bring out some quotes which bring up important concepts and
expose shallow research, shallow thinking or cognitive
dissonance.

“This barbaric ideology will no longer
be tolerated. Islam must change or we will facilitate its
self-destruction.”

Islam is a barbaric way of life: intra-species predation, not an
ideology.  It is intolerable and should never be tolerated and
there is no possibility of reforming it.  Perfection can not be
improved, it can only be defiled: “This day, I have perfected your
religion for you, completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you
Islâm as your religion.”[5:3] What Allah has perfected,. Muslims can not
improve, neither can kuffar.

The Qur’anic enjunctions to wage perpetual war [8:39, 9:29 & 9:123] can not be excised nor amended because
Allah’s word is immutable: “No change can there be in the Words of
Allâh, this is indeed the supreme success. “[10:64] , “No change let there be in Khalq­illâh
(i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic Monotheism), ” [30:30], ” None can change His Words.” [6:115], “None can change His Words” [18:27]

What part of “no change” & “none can change”
does Dooley not comprehend?  Those instructing our officers should
become familiar with the subject before they start lecturing.

“Islam
reduced to a cult status” and “Saudi Arabia threatened with starvation.”

Islam is cultic, its founder arranged marriages,
married a juvenile, lusted after an infant  and  made himself
the final arbiter in all matters spiritual & temporal.   We
need to quit describing and recognizing Islam as a religion.  It
is a way of life with a   contrived religious component which
motivates its fighting forces and camouflages  its predatory
nature.    Cutting off Saudi Arabia’s cash flow is not
practical.  There is no real support for a boycott of Saudi
oil.

 “the historical precedents
of Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki” to Islam’s holiest cities, and
bringing about “Mecca and Medina[‘s] destruction.”

Nuking Mecca & Medina would be a waste of
bombs.  Instead of breaking Islamic morale, it would unite the
Ummah in passionate hatred.   Military victory requires
extinction.  If one Muslim remains, he will recruit others, build
a fighting force, and resume attacks.  A Muslim’s eternal
destination is dependent on his participation in jihad: either the fire
or the celestial bordello.  To see this for yourself, read 9:38-39 & 61:10-13. While there is Islam, there will be
war.  Islam must be completely eradicated, there is no other
solution.

Defeating Islam militarily will require nuking major
Muslim population concentrations; killing Mullahs, Imams & Mufties,
bombing & strafing their funeral processions in mixed population
areas.  Who is willing to wage total and exterminating war? Islam
is, Western Civilization is not. Our cause is lost.

In the second page of their screed, Shachtman &
ackerman lead off by showing their true colors.

Dooley’s
ideological allies have repeatedly stated that “
mainstream
Muslims are dangerous, because they’re “violent” by nature. Yet only a
few of al-Qaida’s most twisted fanatics were ever caught musing about
wiping out entire cities.

That treacherous calumny  depicts the defender
as worse than the attacker and is obviously false.
The President of Iran openly dreams of a “world without America”.
The attacks on the World Trade Center were intended to destroy our
economy.  Both Al-Qaeda and Iran seek nuclear weapons, exactly
what would they be used for if not to destroy cities?

Muslims are dangerous, posing a real,
proximate & persistent existential threat  to civilization
because  of the intrinsic doctrines enshrined in the Qur’an and
exemplified by the hadith..  “Jihad is ordained for you” [2:216] “Fight them until” [8:39]  “Fight those who… until” [9:29] .  “It is not for a Prophet that he
should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had
made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. ” [8:67] .  “I will cast terror” [3:151, 8:12], “Allah cast terror” [33:2659:2].  Muslims are commanded to “strike
terror” and “terrify” real and potential enemies [8:57, 8:60].

Morons  & Traitors want us to believe that
those  egregious ayat of  mandatory conquest, genocide &
terror are metaphorical, anachronistic or deprecated.  But Moe
said something that proves their maundery to be malignant: “I have been
ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be
worshipped but Allah.’ ” [Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387].  “I am commanded to
fight with men till they testify that there is no god but Allah, and
that Muhammad is His servant and His Apostle, face our qiblah
(direction of prayer), eat what we slaughter, and pray like us. ” [Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2635]. “Jihad will be performed
continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the
last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal” [Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2526] .

The Qur’an & hadith  are not the last
word; they are codified in  Shari’ah:  Islamic law.
Open Reliance of the Traveller to  Book O, Chapter 9
and read through O9.9. Islamic law requires a minimum of one military
expedition against disbelievers in every year.  “The caliph makes
war on Jews…”, “The caliph fights all other peoples until they become
Muslim”.

Hedaya, the Hanifi school’s code, tells us that “War
must be carried on against the infidels, at all times, by some party of
the Muslims.”.  “The destruction of the sword is incurred by
infidels although they be not the first aggressors”. [Vol. II, Bk. IX, Ch1].

“Some
of these actions offered for consideration here will not be seen as
‘political correct’ in the eyes of many,”

It is obvious that General Dempsey and the authors
view the content of the course as politically incorrect.

“Ultimately,
we can do very little in the West to decide this matter, short of
waging total war.”

There is something Western Civilization can do, but
it is unconventional and would require a great deal of investment and
time.  Islam can be significantly weakened by inducing mass
apostasy among the Ummah.  Plant the seeds of doubt &
introspection, set the Ummah questioning; induce them to read Islam’s
canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence.  Make
them think rationally about what they believe and the practical
realities of its implementation.

Show the Ummah how Moe plagiarized the Bible &
Apocrypha.  Show them how he ‘revealed’ situational scripture to
give ‘divine’ sanction to his lusts.  Prove to them that Allah is
an impotent idol whose threat & promise are vain.

Begin with production & mass distribution of a
full length feature documentary on the life of Moe, based on the Sira
& authentic hadith.  At least two scripts are ready for
production.  Get it done, translated into Arabic, Urdu & Farsi
and distribute it world wide by satellite broadcast & dvd.
Since much of the Ummah is illiterate, it is necessary to distribute
the Qur’an & hadith in audio format and multiple languages.

Instead of presenting facts and logical arguments,
the authors engage in argumentum ad hominem.

Over
the next few weeks, he invited in a trio of guest lecturers famous for
their incendiary views of Islam.
[Emphasis added.]

What views, and what is false or malicious in them?

Shireen
Burki declared during the 2008 election that “
Obama
is bin Laden’s dream candidate
.”
In her Joint Forces Staff College lecture, she told students that “
Islam
is an Imperialist/Conquering Religion
.”
(.pdf)

Islam is not a religion, it is a Deen: way of life,
with a religious component that motivates Muslims to engage in
genocidal conquest and prevents victims from recognizing the
danger.  If it is not imperialistic, then why is Islamic biography
& history full of raids, ghazwat, expeditions &
conquests?  A sample of the table of contents from The Life of
Muhammad
is appended for your perusal. 1

Creeping Shari’ah  embedded this disgusting
video of Gen. Dempsey calling the course objectionable, educationally
unsound & irresponsible.

  • religious freedom & cultural awareness
  • totally objectionable
  • against our values
  • wasn’t academically sound
  • academically irresponsible

Religious freedom applies to legitimate religions:
theological entities dedicated to right relationships between men, God
and each other; benign, anodyne, beneficent & eleemosynary.
Islam is a predatory way of life contrived for its founder’s personal
emolument through the propagation perpetuation of war. Islam preys upon
everyone who has not already submitted to it.  To review the
documentation of the fatal fact, go to: Islam’s Mercenary Mission and What’s Wrong With Islam & Muslims?

If there is a right to practice Islam, then we have
no rights; all our human rights enshrined in the Declaration of
Independence and protected by the Constitution are abrogated.  To
Islam, our blood and property are not sacred and we have no rights
until we become Muslims.  The practice of Islam entails jihad:
warfare against non-Muslims.  Allah commanded it, Moe exemplified
it, and it is part of an all or nothing package deal, as 2:85 makes clear.

Cultural awareness:  Is the General aware of
the content of the culture of Islam?  What symbol is on the flag
of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia?  What does that symbol
represent?  Perhaps the General should read the translator’s
footnote to 2:190.

Exactly what is objectionable about accurately
naming and describing the enemy when we have been attacked and war is
waged against us?   I have no doubt that the objector is a
Muslim.  How many Nazis were in our officer corps in
WWII?   So why do we enlist and commission the enemy in this
war?   Why should we care if the enemy objects to being named
and described?

What values?  Do we now value obfuscation,
ignorance, irrationality, surrender & submission over victory to
make peace, security and justice prevail?

It was not academically sound: it insanely assumed
that Islam is reformable.  It insanely assumed that nuking Mecca
& Medina would win the war.  But its identification and
general characterization of enemy doctrine is sound; based on objective
factual reality.

The attitude displayed by Gen. Dempsey indicates to
me that he might be better suited to writing for Wired than leading the
Chiefs of Staff.


The first raid: on
Waddan
281

Hamza’s raid to the
coast
283

Raid on
Buwat
285

Raid on
al-‘Ushayra
285

Raid on
al-Kharrar
286

Raid on
Safawan
286

Fighting in the sacred
month
286

The change of the
Qibla
289

Battle of
Badr
289

Zaynab sets out for
Medina
314

Abu’l-‘As accepts
Islam
316

‘Umayr b. Wahb accepts
Islam
318

The chapter of The
Spoils
321

ix.

Names of the Emigrants who fought at
Badr
327

Names of the Helpers who fought at
Badr
330

Names of the Quraysh
prisoners
338

Verses on the
battle
340

Raid on B.
Sulaym
360

Raid called
al-Sawiq
361

Raid on Dhu
Amarr
362

Raid on
al-Furu’
362

Attack on B.
Qaynuqa’
363

Raid on
al-Qarada
364

Killing of Ka’b b.
al-Ashraf
364

Muhayyisa and
Huwayyisa
369

Battle of
Uhud
370

The Quran on
UQud
391

Names of the Muslims slain at
Uhud
401

Names of the polytheists slain at
Uhud
403

Verses on
Uhud
404

The day of
al-Raji’
426

Poems
thereon
429

Treachery at Bi’r
Ma’una
433

B. al-Nadir
exiled
437

Poetry
thereon
439

Raid of
Dhatu’l-Riqa’
445

Last expedition to
Badr
447

Raid on
Dumatu’l-Jandal
449

Battle of the
Ditch
456

Attack on B.
Qurayza
461

Poetry
thereon
470

Killing of
Sallam
482

‘Amr b. al-‘As and Khalid b. al-Walid accept
Islam          484

Attack on B.
Lihyan
485

Attack on Dhu
Qarad
486

Attack on B.
al-Mustaliq
490

Scandal about
‘A.’isha
493

The affair of
al-Hudaybiya
499

The willing
homage
503

The
armistice
504

Those left
helpless
507

Women who migrated after the
armistice
509

Expedition to
Khaybar
510

al-Aswad the
shepherd
519

Division of the spoils of
Khaybar
521

Affair of
Fadak
523

Names of the
Dariyun
523

Return of the second batch of
emigrants
526

x.

The fulfilled
pilgrimage
530

Raid on
Mu’ta
531

The occupation of
Mecca
540

Khalid followed by ‘Ali go forth as
missionaries
561

Khalid destroys
al-‘Uzza
565

Battle of
Hunayn
566

Verses
thereon
572

Capture of
al-Ta’if
587

Division of the spoils of
Hawazin
592

Ka’b b.
Zuhayr
597

His
ode
598

Raid on
TabUk
602

The opposition
mosque
609

Those who hung back from the raid on
TabUk
610

Destruction of
al-Lat
615

Abu Bakr leads the
pilgrimage
617

Hassan’s odes on the
campaigns
624

The Year of the
Deputations
627

The B.
Tamim
628

‘Amir b. al- Tufayl and Arbad b.
Qays
631

Deputation from B.
Sa’d
634

Deputation from’
Abdu’l-Qays
635

Deputation from B.
Hanifa
636

Deputation from
Tayyi’
637

Adiy b.
Hatim
637

Deputation of
Farwa
639

Deputation from B.
‘Zubayd
640

Deputation from
Kinda
641

Deputation from
al-Azd
642

Deputation from
Himyar
642

Farwa b. ‘Amr accepts
Islam
644

B. Harith accept
Islam
645

The false prophets Musaylima and
al-Aswad
648

The farewell
pilgrimage
649

Usama’s expedition to
Palestine
652

Muhammad’s missions to foreign
rulers
652

A summary of Muhammad’s raids and
expeditions
659

Ghalib’s raid on B.
al-Mulawwah
660

Zayd’s raid on
Judham
662

Zayd’s raid on B.
Fazara
664

‘Abdullah b. Rawaha’s raid to kill al-
Yusayr
665

‘Abdullah b. Unays’s raid to kill Khalid b.
Sufyan          666

‘Uyayna’s raid on B. al-‘
Anbar
667

Ghalib’s raid on B.
Murra
667

‘Amr b. al-‘ As’s raid on
Dhatu’l-Salasil
668

xi.

Ibn Abu Hadrad’s raid on
Idam
669

His raid on
al-Ghaba
671

‘Abdu’l-Rabznan’s raid on
Dumatu’l-Jandal
672

Abu ‘Ubayda’s raid to the
coast
673

Salim b. ‘Umayr’s raid to kill Abu’
Afak
675

‘Umayr b. ‘Adiy’s raid to kill’
Asma’
675

Capture of Thumama b.
Athal
676

‘Alqama’s
raid
677

Kurz’s raid on the
Bajilis
677

‘Ali’s raid on the
Yaman

May 17, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Herpetological Excrement: Ending the War in Afghanistan


May Day! May Day!  America is misgoverned by a demagogic traitor who traveled to Afghanistan at our expense, wasting precious tax payer dollars for a pair of  campaign speeches.  The video and partial transcript are here; the full transcript, reproduced below, is here. The English language lacks terms of opprobrium sufficient to express the depth, breadth & intensity of my contempt and detestation of Obama and the snake excrement he spews in an attempt to fool us into the suicidal act of re-electing hem to the high office he is unworthy & unqualified to hold. Obanination’s spew of snake excrement presents a target rich environment, chock full of lies which must be exposed and refuted.  I will highlight the worst of them, linking them to headings over my commentary.  To read my comments, click the links; use your back button to return to your place in the spew.

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Remarks by President Obama in Address to the Nation from Afghanistan

Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan

4:01 A.M. AFT THE PRESIDENT: Good evening from Bagram Air Base. This outpost is more than 7,000 miles from home, but for over a decade it’s been close to our hearts. Because here, in Afghanistan, more than half a million of our sons and daughters have sacrificed to protect our country. Today, I signed a historic agreement between the United States and Afghanistan that defines a new kind of relationship between our countries — a future in which Afghans are responsible for the security of their nation, and we build an equal partnership between two sovereign states; a future in which war ends, and a new chapter begins. Tonight, I’d like to speak to you about this transition. But first, let us remember why we came here. It was here, in Afghanistan, where Osama bin Laden established a safe haven for his terrorist organization. It was here, in Afghanistan, where al Qaeda brought new recruits, trained them, and plotted acts of terror. It was here, from within these borders, that al Qaeda launched the attacks that killed nearly 3,000 innocent men, women and children. And so, 10 years ago, the United States and our allies went to war to make sure that al Qaeda could never again use this country to launch attacks against us. Despite initial success, for a number of reasons, this war has taken longer than most anticipated. In 2002, bin Laden and his lieutenants escaped across the border and established safe haven in Pakistan. America spent nearly eight years fighting a different war in Iraq. And al Qaeda’s extremist allies within the Taliban have waged a brutal insurgency. But over the last three years, the tide has turned. We broke the Taliban’s momentum. We’ve built strong Afghan security forces. We devastated al Qaeda’s leadership, taking out over 20 of their top 30 leaders. And one year ago, from a base here in Afghanistan, our troops launched the operation that killed Osama bin Laden. The goal that I set — to defeat al Qaeda and deny it a chance to rebuild — is now within our reach. Still, there will be difficult days ahead. The enormous sacrifices of our men and women are not over. But tonight, I’d like to tell you how we will complete our mission and end the war in Afghanistan. First, we’ve begun a transition to Afghan responsibility for security. Already, nearly half of the Afghan people live in places where Afghan security forces are moving into the lead. This month, at a NATO Summit in Chicago, our coalition will set a goal for Afghan forces to be in the lead for combat operations across the country next year. International troops will continue to train, advise and assist the Afghans, and fight alongside them when needed. But we will shift into a support role as Afghans step forward. As we do, our troops will be coming home. Last year, we removed 10,000 U.S. troops from Afghanistan. Another 23,000 will leave by the end of the summer. After that, reductions will continue at a steady pace, with more and more of our troops coming home. And as our coalition agreed, by the end of 2014 the Afghans will be fully responsible for the security of their country. Second, we are training Afghan security forces to get the job done. Those forces have surged, and will peak at 352,000 this year. The Afghans will sustain that level for three years, and then reduce the size of their military. And in Chicago, we will endorse a proposal to support a strong and sustainable long-term Afghan force. Third, we’re building an enduring partnership. The agreement we signed today sends a clear message to the Afghan people: As you stand up, you will not stand alone. It establishes the basis for our cooperation over the next decade, including shared commitments to combat terrorism and strengthen democratic institutions. It supports Afghan efforts to advance development and dignity for their people. And it includes Afghan commitments to transparency and accountability, and to protect the human rights of all Afghans — men and women, boys and girls. Within this framework, we’ll work with the Afghans to determine what support they need to accomplish two narrow security missions beyond 2014 — counter-terrorism and continued training. But we will not build permanent bases in this country, nor will we be patrolling its cities and mountains. That will be the job of the Afghan people. Fourth, we’re pursuing a negotiated peace. In coordination with the Afghan government, my administration has been in direct discussions with the Taliban. We’ve made it clear that they can be a part of this future if they break with al Qaeda, renounce violence and abide by Afghan laws. Many members of the Taliban — from foot soldiers to leaders — have indicated an interest in reconciliation. The path to peace is now set before them. Those who refuse to walk it will face strong Afghan security forces, backed by the United States and our allies. Fifth, we are building a global consensus to support peace and stability in South Asia. In Chicago, the international community will express support for this plan and for Afghanistan’s future. And I have made it clear to its neighbor — Pakistan — that it can and should be an equal partner in this process in a way that respects Pakistan’s sovereignty, interests and democratic institutions. In pursuit of a durable peace, America has no designs beyond an end to al Qaeda safe havens and respect for Afghan sovereignty. As we move forward, some people will ask why we need a firm timeline. The answer is clear: Our goal is not to build a country in America’s image, or to eradicate every vestige of the Taliban. These objectives would require many more years, many more dollars, and most importantly, many more American lives. Our goal is to destroy al Qaeda, and we are on a path to do exactly that. Afghans want to assert their sovereignty and build a lasting peace. That requires a clear timeline to wind down the war. Others will ask, why don’t we leave immediately? That answer is also clear: We must give Afghanistan the opportunity to stabilize. Otherwise, our gains could be lost and al Qaeda could establish itself once more. And as Commander-in-Chief, I refuse to let that happen. I recognize that many Americans are tired of war. As President, nothing is more wrenching than signing a letter to a family of the fallen, or looking into the eyes of a child who will grow up without a mother or father. I will not keep Americans in harm’s way a single day longer than is absolutely required for our national security. But we must finish the job we started in Afghanistan and end this war responsibly. My fellow Americans, we’ve travelled through more than a decade under the dark cloud of war. Yet here, in the pre-dawn darkness of Afghanistan, we can see the light of a new day on the horizon. The Iraq war is over. The number of our troops in harm’s way has been cut in half, and more will soon be coming home. We have a clear path to fulfill our mission in Afghanistan, while delivering justice to al Qaeda. This future is only within reach because of our men and women in uniform. Time and again, they have answered the call to serve in distant and dangerous places. In an age when so many institutions have come up short, these Americans stood tall. They met their responsibilities to one another, and to the flag they serve under. I just met with some of them and told them that as Commander-in-Chief, I could not be prouder. And in their faces, we see what is best in ourselves and our country. Our soldiers, our sailors, our airmen, Marines, Coast Guardsmen and civilians in Afghanistan have done their duty. Now we must summon that same sense of common purpose. We must give our veterans and military families the support they deserve, and the opportunities they have earned. And we must redouble our efforts to build a nation worthy of their sacrifice. As we emerge from a decade of conflict abroad and economic crisis at home, it’s time to renew America — an America where our children live free from fear and have the skills to claim their dreams. A united America of grit and resilience, where sunlight glistens off soaring new towers in downtown Manhattan, and we build our future as one people, as one nation. Here in Afghanistan, Americans answered the call to defend their fellow citizens and uphold human dignity. Today, we recall the fallen and those who suffered wounds, both seen and unseen. But through dark days, we have drawn strength from their example and the ideals that have guided our nation and led the world — a belief that all people are treated equal and deserve the freedom to determine their destiny. That is the light that guides us still. This time of war beganin Afghanistan and this is where it will end. With faith in each other and our eyes fixed on the future, let us finish the work at hand and forge a just and lasting peace. May God bless our troops, and may God bless the United States of America. END        4:12 A.M. AFT

sacrificed to protect our country

No enlisted man, woman & officer who suffered, bled or died in Afghanistan, sacrificed themselves. They were sacrificed on the altar of political correctness by Shrub & Obanination who sent them to fight and die in an open ended war without measurable and attainable tactical & strategic objectives, under suicidal rules of engagement.

relationship

The only possible relationship between Afghanistan and the U.S.A. is everlasting enmity.  No other relationship is possible with Muslims and nations governed by Muslims.  Muslims are not our partners, not our allies; they are our enemies. Full comprehension of this fatal fact requires delving into the Qur’an which explicitly forbids subordinate & equal relationships with kuffar and declare intense enmity:  3:118, 4:144, 5:51, 5:57, 60:1 & 5:14, Exactly what part of  “take not as friends” do you not understand?

security of Afghanistan

Blathering about Afghanistan’s  national sovereignty & security is a diversion tactic to draw attention away from the only reasonable strategic objective, substituting a chimera.  So long as the population & regime of Afghanistan are Islamic, they are our enemies, part of the problem; not part of the solution. Afghanistan can never be secure while it borders on an Islamic state.  To secure Afghanistan, Pakistan must be neutralized. It must cease to be Islamic or cease to exist.

al Qaeda

Its Islam, stupid!”. Quit playing the name game!  Perpetual war is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam; it is not an innovation introduced by Abd al-Wahhab, Qutb, al-Banna or anyone else.  Full comprehension of this fatal fact requires delving into the Qur’an, where Allah speaks of casting terror, commands Muslims to engage in it and describes its results.  It also requires delving into the hadith where Moe is caught bragging about winning with terrorism: 3:151, 8:12, 8:39, 8:57, 8:609:29, 9:120, 33:26, 33:27, 59:2, 59:13, Sahih Bukhari 1.8.367, 1.7.331 & 4.52.220. Muslims who take any step to injure or enrage disbelievers earn extra credit for “deeds of righteousness” toward an upgrade in Allah’s Celestial Bordello.  What part of that do you not understand?

staging area

If formulated by a patriot instead of a traitor, the strategic objective would be to permanently remove Afghanistan from the set of terror sponsoring states.  Afghanistan can not be prevented from being a staging area for future attacks unless its population, regime and bordering nations become un-Islamic. So long as it is Islamic, it will be terrorist; no other outcome is possible.

initial success

Invasion is not success. Overthrowing the Islamic regime & replacing it with another Islamic regime is not success.  Eliminating the presence of al-Qaeda camps & operatives is not success.  Removing any state from the set of terror sponsoring states is not possible without eliminating Islam or life from within its borders and those of adjacent states. We allowed Saudi Arabia & Pakistan to fly their operatives home safely; we needed to usher them into Hell.  We failed to secure the ammo dumps, giving the enemy materials for constructing IEDs.  We failed to secure the borders, allowing infiltration of mujahideen and weapons from Iran. Success could only be achieved by nuking Afghanistan & Pakistan off the face of the earth.  Bin Ladin would not have escaped if we Nuked Afghanistan immediately.

different war

Iraq’s population and regime were Islamic.  The Magnificent Nineteen received training at Salman Pak under Saddam’s regime.  Islam is Islam, regardless of sect and national identity.  There is one war with many fronts; a war than can only be won by totally eliminating Islam from the face of the earth.

Afghan security  forces

They are Muslims; terrorists, not security forces; shooting our men in the back.  The enemy is Islam. The war can not be won without eliminating the enemy.  Men who are promisedeternity in Allah’s Celestial Bordello if they wage war and threatened with eternal damnation if they do not will wage war so long as they believe in the threat & promise.  The only alternative to breaking their faithis breaking their necks.

defeat al Qaeda

Its Islam, stupid!“. Every damned slave of Allah is a member of the enemy force, al-Qaeda is a small subset of the enemy, not the enemy.  In WW2, the enemy was Germany & Japan, not Panzers & Kamikazi.  You can have peace or you can have Islam; you can not have both. Choose peace.

complete our mission

The mission will only be complete when there are no living Muslims in Afghanistan & Pakistan.  While those two nations remain Islamic, the mission is a total failure.

commitments to combat terrorism

Only a damned fool expects terrorists to “combat terrorism”.  Muslims are commanded to “strike terror”. They emulatea terrorist.  They earn extra credit for any step taken to injure or enrage us.  One thing is crystal clear from this: Obama is a traitor.

democratic institutions

There is nothing democratic about Islam. Islamic law is the Qur’an & hadith, not the product of a representative legislature.  Allah & Moemake all the decisions.

negotiated peace

While there is Islam, there is no peace. Peace or Islam; choose one!  Islam is permanent war,. it does not make peace. Islam only makes hudnas, with a ten year maximum term. But hudnas are contracts at will, Muslims can break them as soon as they regain sufficient strength to resume attacks.

renounce violence

Taliban are “students of the Qur’an”. The book they study establishes genocidal conquest as an intrinsic sacrament of Islam.  Read  8:39, 67 & 9:29. Islamic law provides the death penalty for renouncing any part of the Qur’an.  Only a damned fool expects Muslims to renounce violence. Only a traitor makes it a campaign promise.

path to peace

The path to peace terminates in the Islamic cemetery.  There is no peace outside the cemetery.

Pakistan’s interests

Global conquest. “Its Islam, stupid!” Obtain a clue: read The Qur’anic Concept of War, a Pakistani strategy manual.

eradicate every vestige of the Taliban

It ain’t Obamination’s goal. Our defeat & destruction is his goal; he is a traitor.  If Islam is not eliminated, we have lost the war.

Our goal

Total & permanent elimination of Islamic aggression must be our goal. Anything less is suicidal. Anything less is a total waste of blood, treasure and time, all in short supply.  Islamic aggression can only be eliminated by eliminating Islam.  I direct doubters & dissenters, damned fools one and all, to Islamic law, which codifies the content of the Qur’an & hadith.  Reliance of the Traveller: O9.1 defines the communal obligation to invade kuffar at least once in every year.  O9.8 states that the caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians.  Hedaya Vol. II, Bk. IX, Ch. 1states that ‘destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels though they be not the first aggressors”.

timeline

When you tell the enemy when you are giving up, you declare your intention to surrender. The enemy need do no more than wait you out before resuming his attacks.

in harm’s way

No American should ever be sent into combat again.  WW2’s pacific theater  was closed with two Atomic bombs. We have the means to wipe hostile nations from the face of the earth, and we should use it.  They want to be martyrs for Allah; grant their wish.  The enemy thinks it can wage a low intensity war, below the nuclear threshold and bleed us to death by attrition.  We must show them their tactical error.

job we started

Shrub did not start the job, he  fooled around, wasting blood and treasure for nothing.  The task is eliminating Islam from Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Iran, and everywhere else because Islam is permanent war.

delivering justice

Terrorism is not a domestic criminal matter for the justice system to handle. It is transnational warfare. Its objective is global dominance for Islam.  The Magnificent Nineteen hijacked those aircraft and flew them into buildings in service to Allah; an act of worship and a military tactic.  I direct doubters & dissenters, damned fools one and all, to the most revealing statement of Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and his four co-conspirators. Intelligent, open minded persons will read it and curse Islam, bigots will not. Killing or imprisoning every member of al-Qaida will not end terrorism or the war; it is a drop in the ocean.  The enemy is Islam, Muslims are its canon fodder.

our men and women in uniform

This appeal to national pride is two pronged: first, it proclaims military success where none exists; our blood and treasure have been wasted on the altar of political correctness.  Second, it attempts to make political capital of our best and brightest, the least of whom is morally as well as intellectually and physically superior to his ‘Commander in Chief”.  With his tongue Obamination praises our military; with his political forces, he guts it through the budget process.

support they deserve

The treacherous hypocrite spewed that lie in supreme arrogance, having attempted to screw the veterans out of their promised medical care.  He demanded that they tap private insurance policies to provide treatment for war injuries. Opportunities?  His economic policies are destroying opportunities, not making them!  The returning troops will be mustered out to the unemployment and welfare lines.

build a nation worthy of their sacrifice

That clause belies the mission to Afghanistan: it is a political campaign trip on our dime. Obamination is making us pay for a campaign stop where he delivered a very expensive stump speech 7000 miles from home.  This nation was built 230 + years ago  It is the values enshrined in the Declaration of Independence and established by the Constitution that make this nation worthy of sacrifice, not Obamination’s Socialist agenda!!!

renew America

That paragraph is another clear example of partisan electioneering at the taxpayer’s expense.  America can only be renewed by reversing every damn thing Obamimation has done.  We desperately need to remove the Socialists & CINOs from the Congress and Obama from the White House.

build our future as one people, as one nation

That fart from the anus of America stands out as a token of condescending arrogance seldom equaled if ever excelled in the history of America.  For the great divider, the practitioner of economic, racial & identity politics to pass that gas speaks volumes of his assessment of our intelligence & awareness.  As much as I hate Romney; my conscience won’t let me vote for him, I hope he defeats Obamination in November.

time of war began

It began with the battle of Badr in the 7th century.  It continued with the conquests of Arabia, North Africa, the Levant, India and South East Europe.  Islam’s war against America began with the attacks of the Barbary Pirates soon after we declared Independence from England.

May 2, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, Politics | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Attempted Suppression of Free Speech: Pentagon vs Jones


I learned today from a Stand Up America! press release that the Pentagon is setting the stage to blame Pastor Terry Jones for the potential  Islamic reaction to his plan to burn the Koran and images of Muhammad on July 28 if the freedom of Youcef Nadarkhani  is not restored by the Iranian regime which has sentenced Youcef Nadarkhani to death for apostasy.

The Guardian quotes Commander Bill Speaks:

“We are aware of Pastor Terry Jones’ threat to burn a Qur’an, and are monitoring the situation. The last time Pastor Jones burned a Qur’an, back in March of 2011, more than 16 people died and more than 90 people were injured from the resulting protests. We hope Pastor Jones will take into account the safety and welfare of deployed US military personnel before engaging in such an activity again.”

The safety and welfare of our troops in Afghanistan and elsewhere are the responsibility of the Pentagon, not Pastor Jones.  Threats to our troops come from Islam and Muslims, not from Pastor Terry Jones.  The biggest threat to the welfare of the troops is their presence on foreign soil. The second biggest threat is the suicidal rules of engagement imposed by Obamination.

Our servicemen are in harms way and thousands have lost lives and limbs only because they were sent by a traitor who should have sent the descendants of “Little Boy” & “Fat Man” .  There is no excuse for having troops on the ground in Afghanistan.  There is no excuse for the continued existence of  Afghanistan, Iran & Pakistan.

When Dar Ul-Islam invades Dar Ul-harb, the obligation of jihad is fard al kifaya: binding upon all eligible male Muslims until a sufficient number have reported to the front.  When Dar Ul-harb retaliates by invading Dar Ul-Islam, the obligation is fard ayn: binding on all Muslims, including Sheikhs, women, children and slaves.  I refer doubters & dissenters to the following odifications of Shari’ah:  Reliance of the Traveller, Risala & Hedaya.

Cropped screenshot of O9.3
Risala Ch. 30
Hedaya page 140

What part of the relevant Islamic law escapes the comprehension of our top brass?  When we answer an attack by invading, the result is genral mobilization, no holds barred.

There is more text on that page of Hedaya; others will not show it to you, I will.
Hedaya, Vol. II pg 141
Muslims do not need a pretext for attack, they desire it for propaganda value, but it is not required to justify attack, invasion, conquest and genocide. How did the Barbary Pirates rationalize their depredations on our merchantmen?

The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

How did those who dispatched the Magnificent Nineteen rationalize the accursed abomination?   Khalid Sheikh Mohammed & his co-conspirators respond with argumentum Tu-quoque:

“With regards to these nine accusations that you are putting us on trial for; to us, they are not
accusations. To us they are badges of honor, which we carry with pride. Many thanks to God, for his
kind gesture, and choosing us to perform the act of Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims.
Therefore, killing you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you, responding back to your
attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion. These actions are our offerings to
God. In addition, it is the imposed reality on Muslims in Palestine, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Iraq, in the
land of the two holy sites [Mecca and Medina, Saudi Arabia], and in the rest ofthe world, where
Muslims are suffering from your brutality, terrorism, killing of the innocent, and occupying their lands
and their holy sites. Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest religious duty to fight you over your
infidelity. However, today, we fight you over defending Muslims, their land, their holy sites,and their
religion as a whole.”

I highlighted two sentences in that quote, go back and read them again.  The accursed abomination was an act of worship.  Get a God blessed clue, for Chrissake!   Fighting us because of our infidelity to Allah is their greatest religious duty.

What part of that do the peons in the Pentagon not comprehend?  Do those stars they wear symbolize ignorance of enemy doctrine?   Not being Muslim is a status offense which justifies genocidal attack.

Scroll up to the quote from Tripoli’s Ambassador to Adams & Jefferson; read it again before reading this quote from Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386.

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”

It is written in their law: they were ordered to fight us. Can you obtain a clue?

Allah purchased believers with the promise of Paradise: after they are killed in battle they go to his Celestial Bordello with rivers of wine and trees always full of low hanging fruit. Plus eternal virgins and little boys who never bleed.  Can you get a clue?

Muslims are commanded to wage war against pagans until only Allah is worshiped on a global scale.  They are commanded to wage war on “people of the book” until we are subjugated and extorted.  Can you obtain a clue?

Muslims are promised an upgrade in their seats in the Celestial Bordello if they take any step to injure or enrage us.  Can you obtain a clue?   Are the President and Pentagon brass  too stupid to obtain clues or are they traitors?

When Muslims raise Hell, it is not because of anything done by Danish cartoonists, a Dutch parliamentarian or a Florida Pastor. It is because of what the Imam tells them to do at Jumah Salat Friday afternoon.

Terrorism is not a function of “extremists”, “radicals” or groups; it is a function of Islam.  Allah said that he would cast terror. Allah said that he cast terror. Allah said that the killing of one group and enslaving of another resulted from his casting terror.  Allah said thet the Jews were more afraid of Moe and his army than of him.  Can you obtain a clue?

When wasps build a nest on your porch and one of them stings you, smash him and the others will attack because theirs is a communal society. Islam is the same way.  Islam can not be defeated militarily short of total eradication.  It can not be contained.   Nobody else will show you why that is. What I am about to display to you contains the key to victory: we must destroy their faith. We must prove to them that Allah is an impotent idol whose promises of victory are vain.  These quotes are from a Pakistani strategy manual.  It does not get more authentic than this.  Get a clue for Chrissake and share it with your Congressman & Senators.

Brig. S.K. Malik wrote The Qur’anic Concept of War as a training manual for the army of Pakistan.  His analysis will help you to comprehend their strategy. Terror is both a means and an end.  This paragraph comes from the bottom of page 59. [Emphasis added.]

Terror struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only
a means, it is the end in itself. Once a condition of terror into
the opponent’s heart is obtained, hardly anything is left to be
achieved. It is the point where the means and the end meet
and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon
the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.

There is one necessary prerequisite for instilling terror: the destruction of our faith. Islam’s strong faith shields Muslims from being terrorized. This paragraph comes from page 60. [Emphasis added.]

Terror cannot be struck into the hearts of an army by merely
cutting its lines of communication or depriving it of its routes
of withdrawal. It is basically related to the strength or weakness
of the human soul. It can be instilled only if the opponent’s
Faith is destroyed. Psychological dislocation is temporary;
spiritual dislocation is permanent. Psychological dislocation can be
produced by a physical act but this does not hold good of the
spiritual dislocation. To instill terror into the hearts of the enemy,
it is essential. in the ultimate analysis, to dislocate his Faith. An
invincible Faith is immune to terror. A weak Faith offers inroads
to terror. The Faith conferred upon us by the Holy Qur’an has
the inherent strength to ward off terror from us and to enable
us to strike terror into the enemy. Whatever the form or type of
strategy directed against the enemy, it must, in order to be effective,
be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy. A strategy
that fails to attain this condition suffers from inherent drawbacks
and weaknesses; and should be reviewed and modified. This rule
is fully applicable to nuclear as well as conventional wars. It is
equally true of the strategy of nuclear deterrence in fashion
today. To be credible and effective, the strategy of deterrence
must be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy.

 

Believers are Allah’s slaves, who kill others and are killed. Believers are only those who fight in Allah’s  cause, which is to make Islam dominant.  Go to Jihad or go to Hell. Go to jihad and go to Paradise.  Get a God blessed clue for Chrissake!  So long as Muslims believe that Allah will give them victory, that he will damn them if they do not wage war and bless them if they do, Islam will continue to present a real, proximate & continuing threat to our lives, liberty & prosperity.

We are not waging the war of ideas and we need to retaliate with a passion.  That is the only alternative if we are not willing to nuke  Islam off the face of the earth.

The Islamic regime in Iran plans to execute a Pastor for abandoning Islam.  Pastor Jones plans a protest in which he will burn the Koran and images of Moe. Now the brass accuse Jones of inciting attacks against our troops.  The blame must be placed on its origin: Islam, not on those who protest against it.

April 22, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 38 other followers

%d bloggers like this: