Innocence of Muslims Update: OIC Demands Blasphemy Law
addressed the General Assembly on behalf of the OIC. They demand
international imposition of Islamic blasphemy law. It is
necessary to highlight their AssWholliness
& hypocrisy; that is the mission of this blog post. They are
bitching about Innocence of Musalims, Charlie Hebdo’s outrageous
cartoons and Qur’an burning. Carefully examine the video and
answer these questions:
- What does the video say about Muhammad and the cult he founded?
- Is it true or false?
- Where is the hate they are bitching about?
- Where is the incitement they are bitching about?
OIC IN THE GENERAL
DEBATE UNDER AGENDA ITEM 9
I have the honour to make this statement on behalf of the OIC,
The OIC Group unequivocally condemns the recent production of a film in
United States called “The Innocence of Muslims” which tries to defame Islam and the
personality of the Holy Prophet Muhammad
(peace be upon Him). This film is a blatant
attempt to provoke religious
and intolerance that has led to unfortunate
loss of life and damage to property. In this context, we also strongly
condemn the violence
that resulted in the deaths of a number of people including a US
We note that the Secretary
General of the United Nations, The High
Commissioner for Human Rights
and the President of the United States have also expressed
their opposition to the film.
Incidents like this clearly demonstrate the urgent
need on the part of States to
introduce adequate protection against acts of hate crimes, hate speech,
intimidation and coercion
resulting from defamation and negative stereotyping of religions,
and incitement to religious
hatred, as well denigration of venerated personalities.
Over the past months, there have been a number of
examples of acts of
incitement to hatred.
These include despicable incidents involving the burning of the Holy
Quran, and the publication of
defamatory cartoons. OIC countries have repeatedly called on
the Governments concerned to take action to avert these offensive actions but nothing
been done on the excuse that such action would be a violation of the freedom of expression.
The OIC underlines that the situation created by the malicious act affirms once
urgency for all States to fully uphold their obligations under
international law”, in particular
articles 19 and 20 olf ICCPR and article 4 of the International
Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination
We disagree. These are not exercises in freedom of expression but deliberate attempts
to discriminate, defame,
denigrate and vilify Muslims and their beliefs. Such acts
constitute flagrant incitement
to violence and are therefore in contravention of ICCPR
Articles 19 and 20. It
is therefore abundantly clear that there exists an urgent need to
an internationally acceptable
threshold between freedom of expression and incitement to
violence and hatred.
The OIC has
never advocated any prohibitions on freedom of expression.
emphasis has been on the need to examine the consequences of unchecked,
irresponsible statements and
actions made by certain groups and individuals that deliberately
instigate and incite violence
on the basis of religion or belief. This can include situations
involving religious minorities
or situations in which minorities react violently either in their
home societies or in societies where their co-religionists are in a
None of.this is completely uncharted territory. For
instance, we are all aware of
the fact that laws exist in Europe and other countries which impose curbs on anti-Semetic
speech, holocaust denial or
racial slurs. We need to acknowledge, once and for all, that
particular and discrimination on the basis of religion and belief are
contemporary forms of racism
and must be dealt with as such. Not to do so would be a
example of double standards. Islamophobia has to be
treated in law and practice equal to the
treatment given to
anti-Semitism, especially in the legislations. -
We recall the general comment 11 of the Human Rights
general comment of the Committee on Elimination of Racial
Discrimination which confirm.
that restricting the freedom of expression on issues relating to racial
. also for incitement to religious hatred.
The OIC’s resolution on “Combating Intolerance,
Negative Stereotyping And
Stigmatization of; and Discrimination, Incitement to Violence, and
Violence against Persons
based on Religion or Belief” adopted by consensus at the 16th
session of the Human Rights
Council on 24 March 2011, was a concrete attempt: to address this very.
concern by bringing
all the key players on board. The consensus resolution was the -result
of a long and often,
difficult negotiation process.
The OIC welcomes the joint statement by the OIC
Secretary general, Arab
League Secretary general, African Union Commissioner for Peace and
Security and European
Union High Representative for foreign and Security policy in which they
shared the profound
respect for all religion and refuse to, allow religion to be used to
confrontation and extremism. They reiterated their strong commitment to
measures and to work for an international consensus on tolerance and full respect of
including on the basis of UN Human rights Council resolution 16/18.
At the heart of the resolution are a series of
practical steps to be taken by states
to combat the ever increasing instances of intolerance, negative stereo-typing,
and discrimination and violence
all over the world. This core issue has been approached in a
manner that is acceptable to
all so that all stake-holders are bound by the commitments
contained in the text. The OIC believes that there is an urgent need to
take concrete steps
towards the implementation of the plan action contained in the
resolution to avoid the
occurrence of such condemnable
incidents in the future. If this is not done, there is a very real
chance of a
breakdown of the delicate consensus on this issue as reflected in the
which would be
unfortunate for all of us.
The OIC remains ready to work with its international
partners at the Human
Rights Council in Geneva, the UN General Assembly in New York to
address and resolve
these critical issues in order to better protect and promote
human rights as well as peace and .
security within our
We also call upon the High Commissioner and her
Office to assist this . important effort.
I thank you.
tries to defame
If you were trying to defame someone with a video,
would you derive its dialogue from his original hagiographic biography
and the most authentic oral traditions from his companions? In
Western legal tradition, defamation involves malicious falsehood.
Exactly what is false about the video’s depiction of Moe?
What does the video have to do with religious
hatred, discrimination and intolerance? It illustrated the hatred
of Muslims who, when they can do it with impunity, murder Christians
and destroy their property. What is provocative about that? Must
the news media be prevented from reporting on religiously motivated
violence in Africa. Arabia and Asia because it might be
provocative? What was Moe’s attitude toward infidels? Was it
accurately depicted in the video? What is provocative about that?
unfortunate loss of life
How did the video lead to loss of life? How many of
the rioters saw the video? The riots were deliberately stirred up by
mass media and rabid rants in the mosques. Fortune had nothing to do
with murder and destruction, they are intended effects of the damnable
doctrines of Islam.
What did Christians destroy and whom did they kill
over “Piss Christ” and “The Holy Virgin Mary”? What is the
difference between Christians and Muslims or their respective doctrines
that explains the widely divergent reactions to disturbing
images? What did Jesus do? What did Moe do? Whom do
Muslims emulate? Do the murders of Kab Ashraf, Asma Bint Marwan
and Um Qirfa ring a bell?
appeal to authority
The listed authority figures are full of fecal
matter so that it comes out their mouths, which I pointed out in
several blog posts. It ain’t who you know, it is what you know. I know
that the conceptual content of the video is true according to Islam’s
canon. I know that there is no rational basis for condemning the
video. I know that the listed authority figures are scared
witless of Islam and seek to appease Muslims. I do not accept
them as an argument for censorship.
hate crimes, hate speech…
Hate crimes and hate speech do not flow from
defamation or negative stereotyping, they flow from hate. The riots in
Egypt and murders in Bengazi are the fruit of wala wal bara:
“love and hate for the sake of Allah”. Those are hate crimes, for which
the criminals constantly seek pretexts. That is low intensity warfare,
a doctrine borrowed from the Soviets and their ‘non aligned’ clients.
Moe hated Jews and Christians because they perceived
the fraudulent nature of the cult he contrived to ensnare them with
perverted and distorted stories from their scriptures and apocryphal
books. The first surah of the Qur’an reminds Allah why he should want
to burn us. Muslims recite it 17 times each day. The second surah
says that we are cursed by Allah, angels and men. The third tells
Muslims that they are the best of peoples raised up for mankind as they
drag us to Islam in chains. It also tells Muslims that if they
attack us, we will do them no harm.
It ain’t defamatory unless it is false and
malicious. Did the video defame Moe when it reported that he
thought he was demon possessed and tried to kill himself? Before
answering, perhaps you should refer to the first book in Sahih Bukhari
and Ibn Sa’d's hadith collection. Did the video defame Moe
when it depicted him as a pedophile? Perhaps you should go to
your favorite hadith search engine and look up “six years old” before
answering that. Muttawir ahadith testify to Aisha’s age at marriage and
consummation, with one hadith giving her age as seven.
Did the video defame Moe when it depicted him as a
lecher? Did he really divert Hafsa from the bedroom on her night
in order to tryst with her slave girl? Dig into Volume 9 of the
Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, page 88 if memory
serves. And the murder of Kinana & rape of his widow,
Safiya? True or false? Look it up in Guillaume’s The Life of
Muhammad and Tabari’, if memory serves, its in Vol. 8. And the
talking donkey? Ishaq reveals that it was paid in tribute by an
Egyptian ruler, along with the slave girl and her sister. The
part about the interview with the donkey is in the Encyclopedia of
And the command to wage war, killing the men and
enslaving their widows and orphans, is that true? If you read the
Qur’an, surahs 8, 9 & 33, you know the answer.
The video does not say anything about Muslims other
than Moe and his companions who are long since dead. How does it
stereotype Muslims? Moe defined and exemplified Islam. 33:21 tells Muslims if they want to meet Allah in
a positive way, they had better emulate Moe. 3:32
tells them to Obey Allah & Moe. What Moe was, pious believers
are to the extent that they know his sunnah and are able to emulate
If Moe channeled Satan instead of God, which he did,
then in stead of worshiping God, Muslims worship his adversary.
If Moe revealed situational scripture, which he did, then Muslims
follow a fraud: a false prophet. When we expose the
truth about Allah & Moe, we expose Muslims as demon’s slaves and
members of a crime syndicate.
incitement to religious hatred
How does the video incite religious hatred?
And what is the foul if it did? Should not an impious fraud which
has murdered millions and enslaves billions be hated? Exposing
evil is not incitement. Doing evil is incitement. The terrorism,
riots & murders,. not cartoons, books & videos cause us to hate
acts of incitement
Uttering & publishing Innocence of Muslims
is not an act of incitement, it is an act of education:: showing
viewers a fair sample what Moe was and what he did. The Qur’an is
an insulting incitement; Allah told Moe to recite it in a low voice to
avoid stirring up the pagans.
said: “When he prayed with his Companions, he would recite Qur’an
loudly, and when the idolators heard that, they insulted the Qur’an,
and the One Who had revealed it and the one who had brought it. So
Allah said to His Prophet
1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way
1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned
Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as
seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never
be accepted of
him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.
3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism,
and real followers of Prophet Muhammad and his Sunnah (legal
ways, etc.)] are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind; you enjoin
Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and
forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has
forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the
Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for
them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are
Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Verse:–”You (true Muslims) are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.” means, the best of
peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks
till they embrace Islam.
3:111. They will do you no
harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if they fight against
you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped.
3:112. Indignity is put over
them wherever they may be, except when under a covenant (of
protection) from Allâh, and from men; they have drawn on themselves the
Wrath of Allâh, and destruction
is put over them. This is because they disbelieved in
the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.)
of Allâh and killed the Prophets without right. This is because they
disobeyed (Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh’s
disobedience, crimes and sins).
8:39. And fight them until
there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping
others besides Allâh) and the religion
(worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world
]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then
certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
8:67. It is not for a Prophet
that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom)
until he had
made a great slaughter (among his
enemies) in the land. You
desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the
captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is
against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among the people of the Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until
they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves
9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that
when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd)
you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of
this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of
the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.
you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment
and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all,
and Allâh is Able to do all things.
9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the
believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs
shall be the Paradise. They fight in
Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a
promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the
Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than
Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is
the supreme success .
9:120. It was not
becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins of the
neighbourhood to remain behind
Allâh’s Messenger (Muhammad when fighting in Allâh’s Cause)
and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer their own lives to his
life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor
hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any
step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an
enemy but is written to their
credit as a deed of righteousness. Surely, Allâh wastes not the
reward of the Muhsinûn
9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who
are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know
that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see
61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that
will save you from a painful torment.
61:11. That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ),
you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and
your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!
61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive
you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers
flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn Eternity ['Adn (Edn)
Paradise], that is indeed the great success.
Publishing videos, cartoons and books along with
burning the Qur’an are symbolic actions which do no objective
harm. Burning churches, murdering Christians, bombing mass
transit and flying hijacked aircraft into office buildings are
offensive actions which incite us to utter and publish the truth about
freedom of expression.
shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging
the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of
the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a
redress of grievances.
then dumb and silent we may be
led, like sheep to the slaughter.
Since Islam declared and is prosecuting war upon us
it is necessary that we be able to discuss it with honesty, accuracy
and clarity. The War College and West Point need to be free to
give full and honest instruction in the doctrines and laws of Islam in
the training of our officer corps. Censorship and political
correctness must be rolled back and stamped out!
Imposition of Islamic blasphemy law would make
Thomas Jefferson a criminal for uttering & publishing his report to
ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the
Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all
nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that
it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could
be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and
that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure
to go to heaven.
Publishing Innocence of Muslims
is not a malicious act, it simply makes available, for those who wish
to view it, an accurate depiction of a segment of the Life of
Moe. Rousing the rabble to attack our Embassy & Consulate and
murder our Ambassador and staff were malicious acts.
Enforcement of human rights covenants
is indeed an urgent matter. The International
Criminal Court must open a case condemning Islam for incitement to war,
racial supremacism and incitement to genocide. Because Islam
perpetrated the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides and seeks to
commit genocide against Jews, it must be condemned and proscribed by
OIC never advocated
prohibition of free expression; never? You demanded that Holland
block release of Fitna and
Wilders’ book. You demanded that Denmark prosecute the publisher of the
You promoted the passage of UN resolutions condemning and demanding the
criminalization of criticism of Islam and you demand persecution of the
creator of Innocence
of Muslims. But you never advocated abridgment of the right of
free speech: Camelshit!
Cartoons, videos, books and statements do not have
consequences. The barbarian behavior of Muslim mobs is a consequence of
the rabid ranting of Imams at Jumah Salat, not anything we do.
Muslims exploit anything we say or do as a pretext for barbarism but
pretext is not causation, it is rationalization. Ladies and
gentlemen: Get a God blessed clue for Chrissake!!! I present for
your edification a sentence of Shari’ah from Hedaya, the code of the
Hanifi school of fiqh.
incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as
appears from various passages in the sacred writings which are
generally received this effect. [
minorities react violently
Did Copts burn mosques when Piss Christ and The Holy Virgin Mary
were put on display as ‘art’? When Muslims ‘react
violently’, they exemplify the damnable doctrines of Islam and their
own AssWholliness, which alone are the
causes of their violence.
on antisemitism & holocaust denial exemplify European stateism, the
USA does not emulate them because of our First Amendment. We allow free
and open debate, secure in the belief that truth will triumph in a
level venue. Those restrictions on European free speech do
not serve as a positive model for imposition of Islam’s blaspemy
law. Islam seeks to prohibit all criticism of Allah, Moe and
their damned war cult because they are indefensible; our factual
evidence and logic can not be refuted. Islam can not prevail in free
debate, so it must silence all critics by force just as Moe
commissioned the assassinations of his critics.
What race is Islam? Its founder and first
adherents were Arabs but it has conquered and forcibly converted
Africans, Asians and Caucasians. The existence of both Black and
White Muslims and the ability to become Muslim without changing
one’s skin pigment or physiognomy serve to devastate the accusation of
racism in thinking minds. Hurling that epithet is the last
refuge of scurrilous politicians and AssWholes.
Phobia is an irrational fear. After the Accursed
Abomination 11 years ago, we are fully aware of the fact that Islam is
a worthy object of fear, loathing and execration, death & damnation
be upon it! Islam inculcates hatred and incites genocidal
violence. Hatred of Islam is well founded and rational, not
contains links to the documents you should read to get a good grip on
the issue of the legislation demanded by the OIC.
tackles the issue of Res 16/18 in detail.
This pair of blog posts will acquaint you with a parallel process
running below the radar of mass media. The Ad Hoc Committee on
Elaboration of Complementary Standards meets for ten days each spring
and fall for the purpose of coding Islam’s blasphemy laws into a
binding protocol to ICERD. If they succeed and the President
signs the damn thing, kiss the First Amendment goodbye
forever. The Iranian proposal and the non paper paper are
essential to understanding what they propose to do.
tolerance & respect
Tolerance is a two way street. Islam is intolerant.
Go back and re-read 3:85 and the context of 3:110. That is
intolerance, not tolerance. How in Hell can anyone who declares
perpetual war against Jews & Christians lecture us about
tolerance? Only by supreme AssWholliness!
Respect must be earned; Islam has not earned it and
is no more respectable than it is tolerable. I can not tolerate
propagation of the idea that my blood and property are not sacred; that I have
no human rights and its open season. I can not tolerate that
which declares and war against me.
I can not respect a G’d'd demon who demands genocide
as the price of admission to his Celestial Bordello. I can not respect a pederast
who claimed divine sanction for his marriage to his
best friend’s six year old daughter. I can not respect a
false prophet who attributed to his idol what his idol did not say, asserting divine sanction for his sexual proclivities.
promote peace and security
The highlighted clause in this sentence fragment is
a thinly veiled threat: threatening violence if we do not submit
to censorship. By God, I will never submit!!!
address and resolve these critical issues in order to better protect and promote
human rights as well as peace and .
security within our
September 28, 2012 - Posted by dajjal | Ahadith, GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | acts of incitement, Ad Hoc Cmte, appeal to authority, consequences, curbs, Defamation, deliberate provocation, denigration, enforcement of human rights covenants, freedom of expression, hate crimes, hate speech, incitement to religious hatred, Islamophobia, legislation, malicious act, minorities react violently, never advocated, offensive actions, OIC, Pakistan, promote peace and security, Racism, respect, stereotyping, tolerance, tries to defame, unfortunate loss of life
2 Comments »
Former HUMINT. ‘Nuf said. Are you serving in the WOT??? Send us the stories and we will post them on the blog, should you so desire. I have received several emails out of the blue inquiring as to my HUMINT experience. I cannot and will not go into the details of such former activities, for the obvious reasons. In a nutshell, I have been fighting terrorists and the ideals of said bodies of murderers since 1974. I “retired” (once in never out) in 2004. 28 of those years were in the service of my country, The United States of America. Now that I am a “civilian”, I continue the battles here in the blogosphere and letters, dispatches, emails and faxes. I have determined that the battle(s) begin here, Stateside. We, the members of the Silent Majority, can be silent no more. The Leftinistra have secured and entrenched themselves within the alleged Main Stream Media now renamed as The Lame Stream Media or as I like to call them, The LSD Press. As a friend of mine from Indiana states, “The Silent Majority must stand up and ‘Do The Right Thing’ and overcome the ‘Vocal Minority’.” It can be done. We just need to get up off our complacent rear ends and fight for that which we know in our hearts is right. If we do not, we automatically fall for and support that which we know in our hearts to be wrong. If the Silent Majority continues to be afraid, they deserve everything that comes their way. PERIOD!
Impeach Obama for Treason: Benghazi
- November 2013 (18)
- October 2013 (1)
- September 2013 (3)
- July 2013 (2)
- June 2013 (7)
- May 2013 (3)
- April 2013 (3)
- March 2013 (1)
- February 2013 (1)
- January 2013 (2)
- December 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (8)
- October 2012 (14)
- September 2012 (29)
- August 2012 (8)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (2)
- May 2012 (4)
- April 2012 (2)
- March 2012 (9)
- February 2012 (3)
- January 2012 (12)
- December 2011 (13)
- November 2011 (12)
- October 2011 (11)
- September 2011 (17)
- August 2011 (15)
- July 2011 (11)
- June 2011 (2)
- May 2011 (8)
- April 2011 (14)
- March 2011 (24)
- February 2011 (15)
- January 2011 (17)
- December 2010 (12)
- November 2010 (19)
- October 2010 (22)
- September 2010 (18)
- August 2010 (27)
- July 2010 (32)
- June 2010 (33)
- May 2010 (22)
- April 2010 (14)
- March 2010 (11)
- February 2010 (9)
- January 2010 (22)
- December 2009 (15)
- November 2009 (24)
- October 2009 (17)
- September 2009 (26)
- August 2009 (16)
- July 2009 (13)
- June 2009 (33)
- May 2009 (27)
- April 2009 (21)
- March 2009 (36)
- February 2009 (33)
- January 2009 (64)
- December 2008 (39)
- November 2008 (40)
- October 2008 (59)
- September 2008 (36)
- August 2008 (27)
- July 2008 (41)
- June 2008 (40)
- May 2008 (40)
- April 2008 (45)
- March 2008 (55)
- February 2008 (40)
- January 2008 (50)
- December 2007 (41)
- November 2007 (34)
- October 2007 (41)
- September 2007 (53)
- August 2007 (33)
- July 2007 (114)
- June 2007 (736)
- May 2007 (516)
- September 2006 (4)
- July 2006 (2)
- March 2006 (3)
New International Qur’an Petition
- 125,423 hits
- A/C.3/68/L.49 Freedom of religion or belief denies the Islam:terrorism connection.
- Adopting Measures to Criminalize Criticism of Islam
- Speaking Out Against Intolerance
- Open Public Debate of Ideas Protects Against Religious Intolerance
- Condemning Advocacy Of Religious Hatred That Incites Violence
- Incidents of Intolerance
- Underlining the Need to Indoctrinate Our Children to Accept Islam
- Underlining a Lie
- Common Values Shared By All Mankind
- Incidents Of Intolerance
- Acts That Advocate Religious Hatred
- Freedom of Expression~Democracy
- everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought,conscience and religion
- Reaffirming further that all human rights are universal,indivisible,nterdependent and interrelated
- Obligation to Prohibit Violence Based On Religion
Preserve First Amendment Petition
- ACLU Morons
- anti-Islam demonstration
- Arrowhead Ripper
- Bio War
- Bush Lies
- Civil War
- Conspiracy Morons
- Contract With America
- domestic oil production
- Double Standards
- Eagles Up
- Elections 2008
- Employee Free Choice Act
- Enemies Within
- Fairness Doctrine
- Founder's Quotes
- Fred Thompson
- free speech
- Freedom Of Speech
- Global Warming
- Global Warming Myth
- Ground Zero
- Home Land Security
- Illegal Immigration
- Independence Day
- Islam Distorted?
- Islam Hijacked?
- Islam Perverted?
- Islam Twisted?
- Islamic Radicalism?
- Islamic Reform
- Islamic Terrorism
- Jihadist Bloggers
- Lame Stream Media
- Learning Curves
- Memorial Day
- MJ Joins Sid
- Muslims Against Sharia
- My CONgress Critters
- News Reviews
- Personal Responsibility
- Persons of Influence
- petition for redress of grievance
- Political Correctness
- Quotable Quotes
- Radical Islam
- Reforming Islam
- Religion of Peace
- Ronald Wilson Reagan
- Screamin' Dean
- Separation of Church and State
- Silent Majority
- Stem Cell
- Studies In Islam
- Studies In Islam Collection
- Terror Threat
- Terrorist Awareness Project
- Third Party
- United Nations
- Usama bin Laden
- Veteran Affairs
- Victory Blogroll
- War News
What Day Is This, Anyway?
Site infoFreedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back
The Andreas04 Theme.